PDA

View Full Version : COURTNEY BROWN : REMOTE VIEWING THE PHOENIX LIGHTS (live stream on 29 July 2015)



shadowstalker
30th July 2015, 02:11
Kerry Cassidy interviewing Courtney


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5BnPhd1O_Q

shadowstalker
30th July 2015, 03:03
its ended now things went glitchie on them first courtney lost audio then things went bye bye

Cidersomerset
30th July 2015, 12:44
Thanks Shadow stalker good interview, I can understand Kerry's frustration and
Courtneys hesitation. Kerry was trying to say look you are talking/watching ET's
live. Shout out to the press , we have actual contact. Courtney is saying we have
presented plenty , that's how far we are prepared to go at this present time.

Courtney got a bit upset with Kerrys persistence then they got cut off......

interesting stuff................

Cognitive Dissident
30th July 2015, 14:03
Right. This has gone beyond "remote viewing" as such - it is actual real time telepathic contact with ETs. Perhaps Courtney does not want to go there live on air but of course Kerry does.

This is the substantive point regardless of anything else. Looks like the cat is out of the bag to be honest. Courtney won't be able to avoid this subject in future, but he'll have some time to think about how to deal with it.

As for the larger picture, perhaps this how actual contact will happen - telepathically, not physically. I guess I should say that this is how actual contact has been happening for a while. Just now it's happening in a different context. Harder to deny, because remote viewing is so well proven.

Twain
30th July 2015, 14:25
Yea, like George Van Tassel channeled his aliens, and every contactee channel since; and before that, spiritualist seances ...and lately, channeling government and ET A.I. ...doubtful. Delusions and frauds is still the norm, IMO. believers will believe, whether it's "The Holy Spirit spoke to me today!" ... Or "My Andromeda Contact tells me the sky is falling!"

Okay aside from fraud and delusion, IF people are speaking with aliens or spirits, it should be evident by now that they are either ignorant or inveterate liars -- tricksters, albeit with some noble cause. WISH THEY'D GET THEIR STORY STRAIGHT!

(Snip)

Jake
30th July 2015, 14:37
Kind of wish Kerry would retire, but she'll need more donations. Maybe her and Collier can move in together and get on disability

You're skepticism is turning into empty insults.. Why cant skeptics offer healthy criticism, , only insults. That is telling, Twain...

Kerry has done more to advance the concept of truth over deceit than any other person that i know,, other than Bill.. kind of a ****ty thing to say right after she just had a stroke!

These are real people, and friends!

Exactly what have you done to move the discussion forward?

I think you should apologize, right away! Kerry is a dear friend, and member of Avalon!

What you just demonstrated is NOT skepticism. Nor scientific!

Jake

Twain
30th July 2015, 14:47
I'm sorry ...


"Kerry has done more to advance the concept of truth over deceit than any other person that i know,, other than Bill.."

... but that's debatable.

I didn't know we had sacred cows here. Kerry, Bill of course, Simon Parkes (had a post deleted when I said he couldn't fool sheeple with his nonsense) ... Anyone else?

Seriously though, I'm not going to apologize for an opinion. I'll take a final warning or something else. And I'm serious about disability. She's sick and needs help, but 'doctors are evil'.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

If you like, I'll edit out the last paragraph, or you can.

Twain
30th July 2015, 15:00
Done......

Jake
30th July 2015, 15:09
Twain, I'm not in to sencoring posts. It would be appreciated if you edit it yourself.

Kerry is a member here. Forum guidelines are quite clear about insulting members.

Twain, demanding your opinion to be honored whilst being insulting towards others Opinions does not help others to take you seriously.

If skepticism means insulting, being rude, and ridiculing others then your skepticism is NOT valid, nor welcome!


As for sacred cows? I consider ALL Avalonians sacred cows!

Jake

Twain
30th July 2015, 15:11
In light of the guidelines, I'm sorry to Kerry and anyone else who took offence (Jake). I'll show myself the door.

Jake
30th July 2015, 15:11
Back to topic! Twain you are welcome here, of course! Its mee job to protect members and this forum!

Jake.

Jake
30th July 2015, 15:17
In light of the guidelines, I'm sorry to Kerry and anyone else who took offence (Jake). I'll show myself the door.


Twain, when your ready,, please come back..

jake

cursichella1
30th July 2015, 15:29
Interesting, until Kerry's confrontational questioning became the interview. It's as if she didn't even watch the full Phoenix Lights video or understand anything about how Farsight Institute conducts their experiments. She was rude and unprofessional and the entire interview was awkward to listen to. Courtney Brown deserves a huge apology. The audio problem must have been the Cat Man hanging up on her.

I'm usually a defender of Kerry's, but this was over the top. Listening to Kerry was like listening to Sean Hannity AND nails on a chalkboard. :(

Cidersomerset
30th July 2015, 15:42
In light of the guidelines, I'm sorry to Kerry and anyone else who took offence (Jake). I'll show myself the door.

That was a little impetuous mate , should of taken '5' on the bench and come back
into play later. It can be frustrating at times , part of being on a forum like this is
respecting other peoples views whether you believe them or not . Jake acted
correctly and you have apologised , I hope when you calm down later and reflect ,
you keep looking in because you are obviously looking for truths like all of us and
are interested in this vast field of research..........

Cidersomerset
30th July 2015, 15:48
I'm usually a defender of Kerry's, but this was over the top. Listening to
Kerry was like listening to Sean Hannity AND nails on a chalkboard.

Not quite Hannity , but I know what you mean , it reminded me of her
confrontation with Steven Greer....LOL I understand her frustration , this
is disclosure . But as Courtney said his remote viewers do not want to be
labelled ' woo, woo ' , which means they are not ready to go further concerning
the mainsteam disclosure than they have so far....

The good thing Kerry is up and running after her illness/attack.......

Mike
30th July 2015, 15:57
In light of the guidelines, I'm sorry to Kerry and anyone else who took offence (Jake). I'll show myself the door.


Twain, when your ready,, please come back..

jake


Darn darn darn....

I was just about to echo this sentiment but I just read Twain has been unsubscribed..

Too bad!

I get it, I really do. I'm not gonna read anyone the riot act. I was just hoping Twain could hang around and just take it down a notch or 2 on the caustic scale. He had some damn good takes...

Sigh.

Jake
30th July 2015, 16:10
Healthy skepticism is welcome from scientific mindsets as well as more esoteric.. I relayed to him several times that his skepticism is quite welcome!

Where did healthy skepticism go? I don't understand how we move a discussion forward with insults and ridicule. The New age needs a bit of a kick in the butt! But we can do better!

Jake

Carmody
30th July 2015, 16:33
Reality is quantum in nature, and thus, is on a timeless scale.

When we get to mass atomic structure, we arrive at the timeline unidirectional time universe we call 3D time-space.

We arrive here, we emerge from out of the 2d quantum field aspects. Our existence is a literal -- flowing emergence.

We project INTO the timeline-unidirectional time universe we call 3D. We live by looking out the rear view mirror, and see only into the 3D time universe, when we use our ego and our bodies.

When we realize the inner self, where the flow into this space comes from... the quantum, timeless, multi-dimensional aspects - come forth.

So, Mike, Twain, etc.. think of it this way:

You are standing in a river:

each atom is like a windmill that is spinning from the flow and it is created by the flow. The windmill or atom as a spinning vortex pattern. Seen only in and via their context to one another.

When we think, when we emote, when we walk and talk, when our heart beats, we are looking DOWNSTREAM ONLY, at the past ONLY. VIA the past. all of the universe of 3d time-space and unidirectional time is a history. It is historical. It contains only the past.

Science will tell you that the exact NOW moment is impossible to reach, except by 'quantum spookiness' Which means, in the context of atoms and elements, alloys and chemicals, etc... they all exist in the past, no matter how we measure them, it is always the past. Even though the NOW moment is what makes them go, what they run on, what their interactions stem from.

So, you can look inside and then be in the now moment, out of time, multi-dimensional, anywhere, any time any place, any interaction, any connection....... or continue to look at the past ---of your ass. Literally.

The animal, the body, the avatar that we project into this past via, filters everything. EVERYTHING, and it makes sure that you continue to look at this past timeline 3d time-space universe thing.

Now, importantly, when we project, we can project into and on those historical elements of atoms and the time-space that exists as a relation between them. But remember that within each of them, is a NOW moment, they flow from the eternal all connected NOW moment. And we are connected to all things, we are of that now moment.

So, when someone brings their affected and nasty past into the now moment and projects it upon the atoms and dark matter, in it's emergence into this 'past' thing called 3d reality... ..it can and does affect EVERYTHING.

All the weird science, the alien encounters, the psychic encounters, the whole damn thing, all of it....all you can think of ...is directly explained via this simple explanation. This simple point of vital understanding.

So, to not be negative -as integration, as projection... to not shift and color the emergence of the now moment.... as it flows into being as the past and as representation of the 3D universe that every one reading this tends to call 'reality'.'


For example, crossing dimensions? Beings feeding off us, from other dimensions? Yes, no problemo, definitely possible, as the NOW moment of emergence is the fulcrum point. Other dimensions are simply relational aspects of this flow, at a different angle of integration (connected at the same fulcrum) and interaction. So when you are manipulated into modifying your own reality, this can and does cause energy shifts in other dimensions. it is all frequency dependent energetic vibration, thus ley lines and dimensional crossing zones, dimensional craft that travel through the fulcrum point, and then emerge elsewhere, etc. The list of things that can be explained via this simple point is endless as the questions, as it all fits. and Occam's razors says that..the simplest answer..tends to be the right one.

There is no question in all of science and all weird questions, physics or otherwise....that cannot be answered, when it the analysis is rooted in this simple point.

cursichella1
30th July 2015, 16:43
I'm usually a defender of Kerry's, but this was over the top. Listening to
Kerry was like listening to Sean Hannity AND nails on a chalkboard.

Not quite Hannity , but I know what you mean , it reminded me of her
confrontation with Steven Greer....LOL I understand her frustration , this
is disclosure . But as Courtney said his remote viewers do not want to be
labelled ' woo, woo ' , which means they are not ready to go further concerning
the mainsteam disclosure than they have so far....

The good thing Kerry is up and running after her illness/attack.......


Thanks, Cidersomerset. I appreciate your comments.

I think Courtney Brown has good reason to stick with his protocols. He knows that by doing his experiments and collecting data in a clinical and methodical manner, his experiments and their results are above criticism from a scientific perspective. He's attempting to prove RV's legitimacy and doing a good job of it. He's not opposed to expanding on RV's potential, but he has very legitimate reasons for doing it carefully if his experiments are to continue to remain respectable to all, a large part of 'all' being the scientific community. Hence, the woo-woo comment.

If I was able to deduct this from the few Farsight RV experiments I've seen, then certainly Kerry should know this from doing minimal homework prior to interviewing Courtney Brown. Even without having done her homework, she should have been sensitive to what he was saying. She wasn't listening.

I'm absolutely glad that Kerry's better, too. Her enthusiasm is a great asset, but she's hurting what she is trying to promote by handling interviews in this manner. (My Sean Hannity comment comes from my feeling the identical discomfort in this interview that I felt when Hannity interviewed Kevin Barrett.)

z9TrY5URAYA

btw, I don't see Kerry's interviewing style to be manipulative like Hannity's at all.
Kerry is sincere. Hannity is not. For anyone interested in seeing that, off topic to Kerry's interview, see this breakdown of Neuro-linguistic programming of the same Hannity Barrett interview. Fascinating.

N9BeXEvdcpo

Cidersomerset
30th July 2015, 17:08
If I was able to deduct this from the few Farsight RV experiments I've
seen, then certainly Kerry should know this from doing minimal homework prior to
interviewing Courtney Brown. Even without having done her homework, she should
have been sensitive to what he was saying. She wasn't listening.


Kerry has interviewed Courtney before , she just knows he is holding back , and
though she seemed insensitive, and not listening properly. If the interview went on
longer I think they would of been fine. They were only scheduled for around 45
mins , so Courtney may not of been able to call back..............


====================================================
====================================================


Whistle Blower Radio - Kerry Cassidy and Guest Courtney Brown //Teil 1

Rkc-aJGxOUw

Published on 22 Jun 2012

Whistle Blower Radio - Kerry Cassidy and Guest Courtney Brown //Teil 2

NSdsCclaDYc

Published on 22 Jun 2012


====================================================
====================================================




COURTNEY BROWN: ATLANTIS & EARTH CHANGES

56vocswrAXs

Published on 9 Aug 2013


Dr. Courtney Brown will discuss two important and recently completed projects done at The Farsight Institute.
The first is the successful conclusion of the 2008-2013 Climate Project, where remote viewers working at The
Farsight Institute correctly described five years in advance extraordinary climate change that is still ongoing
today as well as once-in-a-lifetime potentially devastating meteor events that were completely unknown to
mainstream science in 2008. Dr. Brown will also give new insights and evidence suggesting how the Climate
Project data may have been used by human authorities to alter our timeline. The second project is the riveting
new Atlantis Project that describes in unprecedented detail the final days of a past technologically advanced
human civilization on Earth that destroyed itself entirely. This is the first detailed look this ancient civilization
that uses military-grade remote viewing combined with explicit Google Earth imagery to show the daily lives
of the people in that society, how they witnessed their own destruction, exactly what they did exactly to
destroy their world, and why we are unambiguously their descendents. Secrecy cloaked science destroyed
our world in the past, and we are repeating those same mistakes today. Now is the time to learn from our past.



====================================================
====================================================

I cannot believe this was 2009.......Hannity is a A-- LOL.....

What I don't like about Fox is that they tag team , trying to hussle
their guests, luckily it did not work on Jesse as he was a pro ' Tagger'...

Jesse Ventura Vs. Sean Hannity

0q_2ESw2k2c

====================================



Jesse Ventura ****s Fox Hannity

tNek-kiDO48

Uploaded on 23 May 2009

Jesse Ventura Interview With Hannity On FOX May.18, 2009

Mike
30th July 2015, 17:47
Reality is quantum in nature, and thus, is on a timeless scale.

When we get to mass atomic structure, we arrive at the timeline unidirectional time universe we call 3D time-space.

We arrive here, we emerge from out of the 2d quantum field aspects. Our existence is a literal -- flowing emergence.

We project INTO the timeline-unidirectional time universe we call 3D. We live by looking out the rear view mirror, and see only into the 3D time universe, when we use our ego and our bodies.

When we realize the inner self, where the flow into this space comes from... the quantum, timeless, multi-dimensional aspects - come forth.

So, Mike, Twain, etc.. think of it this way:

You are standing in a river:

each atom is like a windmill that is spinning from the flow and it is created by the flow. The windmill or atom as a spinning vortex pattern. Seen only in and via their context to one another.

When we think, when we emote, when we walk and talk, when our heart beats, we are looking DOWNSTREAM ONLY, at the past ONLY. VIA the past. all of the universe of 3d time-space and unidirectional time is a history. It is historical. It contains only the past.

Science will tell you that the exact NOW moment is impossible to reach, except by 'quantum spookiness' Which means, in the context of atoms and elements, alloys and chemicals, etc... they all exist in the past, no matter how we measure them, it is always the past. Even though the NOW moment is what makes them go, what they run on, what their interactions stem from.

So, you can look inside and then be in the now moment, out of time, multi-dimensional, anywhere, any time any place, any interaction, any connection....... or continue to look at the past ---of your ass. Literally.

The animal, the body, the avatar that we project into this past via, filters everything. EVERYTHING, and it makes sure that you continue to look at this past timeline 3d time-space universe thing.

Now, importantly, when we project, we can project into and on those historical elements of atoms and the time-space that exists as a relation between them. But remember that within each of them, is a NOW moment, they flow from the eternal all connected NOW moment. And we are connected to all things, we are of that now moment.

So, when someone brings their affected and nasty past into the now moment and projects it upon the atoms and dark matter, in it's emergence into this 'past' thing called 3d reality... ..it can and does affect EVERYTHING.

All the weird science, the alien encounters, the psychic encounters, the whole damn thing, all of it....all you can think of ...is directly explained via this simple explanation. This simple point of vital understanding.

So, to not be negative -as integration, as projection... to not shift and color the emergence of the now moment.... as it flows into being as the past and as representation of the 3D universe that every one reading this tends to call 'reality'.'


For example, crossing dimensions? Beings feeding off us, from other dimensions? Yes, no problemo, definitely possible, as the NOW moment of emergence is the fulcrum point. Other dimensions are simply relational aspects of this flow, at a different angle of integration (connected at the same fulcrum) and interaction. So when you are manipulated into modifying your own reality, this can and does cause energy shifts in other dimensions. it is all frequency dependent energetic vibration, thus ley lines and dimensional crossing zones, dimensional craft that travel through the fulcrum point, and then emerge elsewhere, etc. The list of things that can be explained via this simple point is endless as the questions, as it all fits. and Occam's razors says that..the simplest answer..tends to be the right one.

There is no question in all of science and all weird questions, physics or otherwise....that cannot be answered, when it the analysis is rooted in this simple point.




i understood all this perfectly for a second or 2 ....and then it vanished:). the metaphor was helpful.

i was just reading something the other day about never being in the present...but it was all couched in this idea that it takes light x amount of nano seconds to reach our eyes...so basically we're always seeing the past...as humans, we will always be a step behind the universe.

i understand your concept is an entirely different one, but it reminded me of this

shadowstalker
30th July 2015, 19:00
Kerry has interviewed Courtney before , she just knows he is holding back , and
though she seemed insensitive, and not listening properly. If the interview went on
longer I think they would of been fine. They were only scheduled for around 45
mins , so Courtney may not of been able to call back..............

It was scheduled for much longer then that and it was already 30 minutes late. it was suppose to start at 9:30 pm Ny time.
They got cut of for some reason and she tried to get him back to Finnish the interview but to no avail.

It is scheduled again for tonight at 10:00 pm NY time. hope to see you guys there.

Cidersomerset
30th July 2015, 20:20
It was scheduled for much longer then that and it was already 30 minutes late. it was suppose to start at 9:30 pm Ny time.
They got cut of for some reason and she tried to get him back to Finnish the interview but to no avail.


Unless I imagined it , I thought Kerry said to Courtney we only have limited time
left for the interview tonight , and he replied something like 45 mins. That's why
although it finished abruptly , and Kerry may have tried to ring him back . I
did not think there was an issue even though it got a little 'testy' towards the end,
and if they are doing it again tonight that obviously confirms they are fine .....

mojo
30th July 2015, 21:05
Usually the remote viewer doesnt know what the target is. Did Courtney mention the viewers knew the target or not because it seems so in the video, as the opening interview mentions targets. The problem with knowing the target creates too much intellectual noise for the remote viewer to wade through. Its seems better to be clear and open and not know to avoid that. Did I miss that somwhere?

Cidersomerset
30th July 2015, 21:45
Did Courtney mention the viewers knew the target or not because it seems so in the video

Courtney said they did not know the target and never do. It did get a but blurred as
the US viewer broke protocol in the 'surprise ' of the moment when he saw the tall
blonde ET with the smaller drone/grey helpers. He spoke to the Blond guy who
looked a bit like Julian Assange as Kerry piped in , as the US viewer focused in
the blonde humanoids face came into sharp focus and his eyes seemed to change
into feline diamond pupils .That's the main part I can remember , hopefully they
will get straight into it tonight.


h5BnPhd1O_Q


I'm transcribing this............

Aprox 15 mins in Kerrys asks Courtney " You did not show them , your remote
viewers , you didn't preload them at all correct " ?

Courtney answers " No we never do that , the only thing we do is I send them none
leading e mails saying we have a target , remote view it . Period that's all they get,
and then they do a paper and pen session to warm up and then they go to video,
and they do it and send it to me on drop off box , and then we show the entire
things basically unedited within the DVD's , videos on demand and the final videos
release . So people know we are not spinning it because they can watch the whole
thing , but the quality of the remote viewers that we work with is so great its like
you are on the edge of your seats watching it while you actually see them explain it.

They got everything , this is a city in the American South West , people on the
ground are looking up , there are lights in the sky , there's this huge craft in flight,
they got everything . I mean the descriptions were so clear it would not have been
better if they had been there with them physically looking at it with their own eyes.
Infact it was better the way they could do it because they could go up into the craft,
and actually see what was going on in the craft. So in that sense it was better than
if they were eye witness's. "

Kerry replays and it in the next exchange , Kerry says we are limited for time
and Courtney says yes aprox 40 mins he has to finish the interview .....

t2016
31st July 2015, 05:31
I read the comments from youtube and I feel sorry for Courtney

BoilerBloodline
Jesus...Kerry Cassidy...you cannot invite someone to be interviewed and then ridicule their protocols just to satisfy your need to feel important. Your need to sound credible has always and will always bleed through every interview. Please note: Ask a short and concise question...then SHUT ......

seehas
31st July 2015, 06:57
Courtney Brown allways talks for Hours when the keyfacts could be told in 2minutes, in every interview he explains how remoteviewing works and how his partners work ... thats the main reason i avoid his material, its just to overloaded.

Cidersomerset
31st July 2015, 18:16
This is not a Camelot interview , but is about one of the Alien project targets
Courtney mentioned with Kerry...Which was a package of three The face on Mars
and Cydonia , The Crater on Iapetus , and the Phoenix lights......


Courtney Brown - Aliens On Iapetus

ivW2p-k52MY

Published on 11 Jun 2015


Courtney Brown discusses The Farsight Institute’s latest project Aliens On Iapetus.
This remote viewing documentary focuses on what appears to be a huge set of
structures on the surface of Iapetus, a moon of Saturn. The apparent structures
are clearly visible in a photograph that was taken by the Cassini space probe that
still orbits Saturn. We now know what these things are, who built them, and why.
We also know what happened to those who stayed there, and how they died. This
was not a military outpost, not a spy base, nor an industrial or mining location. It
is actually more amazing than anything anyone could have imagined.

The project’s findings also pose some fascinating questions: How similar were the
beings on Iapetus to ourselves, and can their story teach us anything about our
own past and possible future? Could it be that life in the solar system did not begin
on Earth but on other planets long cold and dead or even completely destroyed?
And does our selective blindness to the cosmic catastrophes of high antiquity
obscure terrible truths now all but lost in the mists of time? Cutting edge physics
and emerging research into psychic phenomena might just offer some answers.

Cidersomerset
6th August 2015, 18:52
I was contemplating posting this as a thread , but will post here for now....


Remote Viewing Revelations From the US Military to the British MoD

By ickonic on 6th August 2015 Mysteries, What is Reality?

http://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/RemoteViewing-1200x675.jpg

====================================================

http://www.wakingtimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/WT-Logo-Color-Orange-Red-Fade-1.png


Remote Viewing Revelations From the US Military to the British MoD
By WakingTimes August 5, 2015

http://www.wakingtimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Remote-Viewing.jpg

‘Surprising new evidence reveals that the British Government showed an active interest
in using psychics for espionage purposes. In a document obtained under the Freedom of
Information Act by UFO author and investigator Timothy Good, it was discovered that the
British Ministry of Defence (MoD) undertook a study between 2001 and 2002 to investigate
the efficiency of remote viewing.

For those who don’t know, remote viewing – also called ‘travelling clairvoyance’ – is the
ability to perceive places, persons and actions using psychic means. As is now well known,
the US Army and various other tax payer supported government agencies, including the CIA,
investigated and utilised remote viewing during the 1970s and 1980s.

Now that it’s been declassified, all of the documentation pertaining to the British MoD’s remote
viewing study can be obtained from their website – or so they claim. In one section it states
that the results they obtained were largely unsuccessful and “undoubtedly disappointing with
no one achieving any useful performance as an RV subject.” However, given the fact that
untrained novices were used in the study, as well as the fact that the remote viewing methods
they employed left much to be desired, this is not surprising.’

Read more: Remote Viewing Revelations From the US Military to the British MoD

http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/08/05/remote-viewing-revelations-from-the-us-military-to-the-british-mod/