cursichella1
30th September 2015, 16:42
I don't watch TV if I can help it and if I watch anything, it's by accident and never fails to disappoint. This commercial came on as I walked through the the den last night. Apparently this "humanitarian" partnership is in its 3rd year.
"Walgreens and United Nations Foundation Launch 2015 Get a Shot. Give a Shot® Campaign"
Manipulating Americans into getting flu shots so they can feel like they're doing something to help African babies is just too much:
8h6J5Wj8E8o
The commercial doesn't say exactly which vaccines they will be exacting on these Third World kids...if history is an indicator it can't be good but then I imagine placards reading "Beware of Western Man who offers free shot to your kid" are hard to spot in the Bush and the U.N. isn't likely to volunteer anything because they know how desperately Walgreens and Vaccine manufacturers need to make $ (and then there's that depopulation agenda...)
For the cost of a few million in ad dollars, another (maximum) $2M in donations and another $99 per dose for the Third Worlders (for MMR, they don't post the price for Polio vaccine), all legit writeoffs...Wallgreens and vaccine manufacturers must be making an absolute fortune.
"Third year of program enables Walgreens customers to help protect millions of children in developing countries from polio and measles"
From July 1, 2015 to Aug. 31, 2016 for every immunization administered, Walgreens will donate $0.18 to the United Nations Foundation, up to a maximum donation of $2,000,000. (To be used for...? Vaccines? Vaccines that cost 18¢ or is that for a bowl of rice??) Why does Walgreens charge consumers $99 for MMR (http://www.walgreens.com/topic/healthcare-clinic/price-menu.jsp) (combo measles, mumps and rubella shots that may be the cause of autism, ADHD, etc.?) for something they're so willing to give away to unsuspecting Africans (or for 18¢?), yet again? The details are foggy at best.
According to Walgreens' website (http://www.walgreens.com/topic/healthcare-clinic/price-menu.jsp), a flu shot costs $31.99. This is paid for by one's medical insurance which is paid for by the consumer, their employer or your tax dollars and is bound to have a negative effect on everyone's insurance rates going forward.
You, by the way, can only write off whatever your insurance doesn't cover if you have a co-pay. Only the Big Players get the Big write-offs.
Jon Rappoport on "flu shots":
Boggling flu hoax: not for prime-time news
by Jon Rappoport
September 29, 2015
"Repeat a lie often enough and people believe it. We all know that. But there are millions of people out there who think a public-health agency like the CDC, a scientific body, would never engage in such tactics. Those millions of people would be wrong. There is a rule: the most holy, sacred, revered, uncontestable organization hides the biggest secrets. It's a good rule to keep in mind. Major media don't apply it. But you can." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
There are many propaganda operations surrounding the flu. Here I just want to boil down a few boggling facts.
Dr. Peter Doshi, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals one monstrosity.
As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.
This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.
So they don't have the flu.
Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn't possibly prevent all those "flu cases" that aren't flu cases.
The vaccine couldn't possibly work.
The vaccine isn't designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.
Here's the exact quote from Peter Doshi's BMJ review,"Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease"(BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
"...even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the 'flu' problem because most 'flu' appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.
"...It's no wonder so many people feel that 'flu shots' don't work: for most flus, they can't."
Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren't the flu.
So even if you're a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you're on the short end of the stick here. They're conning your socks off.
See Rappoport's entire article here (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/09/29/boggling-flu-hoax-not-for-prime-time-news/)
See Walgreens' Press Release here (http://news.walgreens.com/press-releases/general-news/walgreens-and-united-nations-foundation-launch-2015-get-a-shot-give-a-shot-campaign.htm)
Some articles on MMR here (http://www.naturalnews.com/MMR_vaccine.html)
"Walgreens and United Nations Foundation Launch 2015 Get a Shot. Give a Shot® Campaign"
Manipulating Americans into getting flu shots so they can feel like they're doing something to help African babies is just too much:
8h6J5Wj8E8o
The commercial doesn't say exactly which vaccines they will be exacting on these Third World kids...if history is an indicator it can't be good but then I imagine placards reading "Beware of Western Man who offers free shot to your kid" are hard to spot in the Bush and the U.N. isn't likely to volunteer anything because they know how desperately Walgreens and Vaccine manufacturers need to make $ (and then there's that depopulation agenda...)
For the cost of a few million in ad dollars, another (maximum) $2M in donations and another $99 per dose for the Third Worlders (for MMR, they don't post the price for Polio vaccine), all legit writeoffs...Wallgreens and vaccine manufacturers must be making an absolute fortune.
"Third year of program enables Walgreens customers to help protect millions of children in developing countries from polio and measles"
From July 1, 2015 to Aug. 31, 2016 for every immunization administered, Walgreens will donate $0.18 to the United Nations Foundation, up to a maximum donation of $2,000,000. (To be used for...? Vaccines? Vaccines that cost 18¢ or is that for a bowl of rice??) Why does Walgreens charge consumers $99 for MMR (http://www.walgreens.com/topic/healthcare-clinic/price-menu.jsp) (combo measles, mumps and rubella shots that may be the cause of autism, ADHD, etc.?) for something they're so willing to give away to unsuspecting Africans (or for 18¢?), yet again? The details are foggy at best.
According to Walgreens' website (http://www.walgreens.com/topic/healthcare-clinic/price-menu.jsp), a flu shot costs $31.99. This is paid for by one's medical insurance which is paid for by the consumer, their employer or your tax dollars and is bound to have a negative effect on everyone's insurance rates going forward.
You, by the way, can only write off whatever your insurance doesn't cover if you have a co-pay. Only the Big Players get the Big write-offs.
Jon Rappoport on "flu shots":
Boggling flu hoax: not for prime-time news
by Jon Rappoport
September 29, 2015
"Repeat a lie often enough and people believe it. We all know that. But there are millions of people out there who think a public-health agency like the CDC, a scientific body, would never engage in such tactics. Those millions of people would be wrong. There is a rule: the most holy, sacred, revered, uncontestable organization hides the biggest secrets. It's a good rule to keep in mind. Major media don't apply it. But you can." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)
There are many propaganda operations surrounding the flu. Here I just want to boil down a few boggling facts.
Dr. Peter Doshi, writing in the online BMJ (British Medical Journal), reveals one monstrosity.
As Doshi states, every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory samples are taken from flu patients in the US and tested in labs. Here is the kicker: only a small percentage of these samples show the presence of a flu virus.
This means: most of the people in America who are diagnosed by doctors with the flu have no flu virus in their bodies.
So they don't have the flu.
Therefore, even if you assume the flu vaccine is useful and safe, it couldn't possibly prevent all those "flu cases" that aren't flu cases.
The vaccine couldn't possibly work.
The vaccine isn't designed to prevent fake flu, unless pigs can fly.
Here's the exact quote from Peter Doshi's BMJ review,"Influenza: marketing vaccines by marketing disease"(BMJ 2013; 346:f3037):
"...even the ideal influenza vaccine, matched perfectly to circulating strains of wild influenza and capable of stopping all influenza viruses, can only deal with a small part of the 'flu' problem because most 'flu' appears to have nothing to do with influenza. Every year, hundreds of thousands of respiratory specimens are tested across the US. Of those tested, on average 16% are found to be influenza positive.
"...It's no wonder so many people feel that 'flu shots' don't work: for most flus, they can't."
Because most diagnosed cases of the flu aren't the flu.
So even if you're a true believer in mainstream vaccine theory, you're on the short end of the stick here. They're conning your socks off.
See Rappoport's entire article here (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/09/29/boggling-flu-hoax-not-for-prime-time-news/)
See Walgreens' Press Release here (http://news.walgreens.com/press-releases/general-news/walgreens-and-united-nations-foundation-launch-2015-get-a-shot-give-a-shot-campaign.htm)
Some articles on MMR here (http://www.naturalnews.com/MMR_vaccine.html)