View Full Version : Inexplicable Moon Anomalies Reveal Deception About Outer Space
chanda
20th October 2015, 15:32
I found this news really interesting!
:thumbsup:
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/10/19/inexplicable-moon-anomalies-reveal-deception-about-outer-space/
Cidersomerset
20th October 2015, 15:43
I just saw this article on the headline page and was wondering where to post it..LOL
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inexplicable Moon Anomalies Reveal Deception About Outer Space
By David Icke on 20th October 2015 Mysteries, What is Reality?
http://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/get-attachment-38.jpg
=================================================
=================================================
http://www.wakingtimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/WT-Logo-Color-Orange-Red-Fade-1.png
Inexplicable Moon Anomalies Reveal Deception About Outer Space
By WakingTimes October 19,2015
http://www.wakingtimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Moon-1.jpg
Moon-1Makia Freeman, Contributor
Waking Times
‘Moon anomalies are nothing new, there are many people, including mainstream
Western scientists, who have pointed out numerous highly strange and irregular
things about the moon. A few years ago David Icke brought the book Who Built
The Moon? by Chris Knight and Alan Butler to attention, and concluded that the
moon is an unnatural object that has been placed there for some reason – possibly
as a broadcasting station. Icke further linked the moon to Saturn, and theorized
that the “Matrix” in which we live is actually a program originally broadcast by
Saturn and amplified by the moon. He called it the Saturn-Moon-Matrix.
Now, with consumer technology rapidly advancing all the time, there are many
people pointing their video cameras up at the night sky … with incredible results.
More confirmation that all is not as it seems in outer space is the most visually
fascinating of the latest moon anomalies: the lunar wave.’
The Lunar Wave, as Caught on Film by Crrow777
A man going by the name of Crrow777 has filmed some astonishing footage of the
moon. He caught something which he dubbed the “lunar wave” going across the
surface of the moon, from bottom to top as it appeared on his camera. This lunar
wave has the appearance of a line that moves across a computer screen during a
reset. It looks digital, electronic or holographic. Yet, how could that possibly be true
if the moon were just a natural satellite of Earth, made from rock?
iMQTEEbtTYc
Read more: Inexplicable Moon Anomalies Reveal Deception About Outer Space
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/10/19/inexplicable-moon-anomalies-reveal-deception-about-outer-space/
———————————————————————————————————————
David Icke – Saturn & The Moon Matrix
WpSqADAur-w
Sunny-side-up
20th October 2015, 18:21
Thx chanda thats a powerfull linked page of info, well worth reading!
http://www.wakingtimes.com/2015/10/1...t-outer-space/
Lunar Wave Follows Many Other Observed and Proven Moon Anomalies
The exciting discovery of the lunar wave comes on the heels of many other bizarre moon anomalies. Here is a brief list of some of the more prominent moon anomalies which have been discovered:
– Astronomer Carl Sagan wrote in his 1966 book Intelligent Life in the Universe that “a natural satellite cannot be hollow”, yet evidence indicates the moon is hollow. There are reports that it rung like a bell when hit with objects. In the Zulu tradition, shaman Credo Mutwa said that his people thought of the Moon as an egg without its yolk (i.e. hollow). The website BibliotecaPleyades states:
“The moon’s mean density is 3.34 gm/cm3 (3.34 times an equal volume of water) whereas the Earth’s is 5.5. What does this mean?
In 1962, NASA scientist Dr. Gordon MacDonald stated, “If the astronomical data are reduced, it is found that the data require that the interior of the moon is more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere.” Nobel chemist Dr. Harold Urey suggested the moon’s reduced density is because of large areas inside the moon where is “simply a cavity.” MIT’s Dr. Sean C. Solomon wrote, “the Lunar Orbiter experiments vastly improved our knowledge of the moon’s gravitational field… indicating the frightening possibility that the moon might be hollow.””
– Considering the Earth’s size and magnetic field, it is quite unlikely to have a satellite at all, but if it were to have one, we could expect it to be something in the vicinity of 30 miles round. For instance, Mars’ 2 moons, Phobos and Deimos, have diameters of 13 and 4 miles respectively. Yet, the Moon’s diameter is around 2160 miles – bigger than Pluto – and more than 1/4 of the Earth’s diameter!;
– The Moon’s diameter is 400 times smaller than that of the Sun, and is 400 times closer to the Earth than the Sun meaning the Moon neatly and exactly blocks out the Sun during a solar eclipse! What are the chances of this? The Moon blocks the Sun’s disk so precisely during a solar eclipse that the Sun’s corona can be studied, without which much of Einstein’s work would not have been confirmed. Isaac Asimov described this as being “the most unlikely of coincidences”;
– A one second arc of the Moon’s rotation is exactly equal to 100 megalithic yards. Coincidence?;
– In his book Alien Agenda, Jim Marrs quotes this interesting idea from science writer William Roy Sheldon:
“It is important to remember that something had to put the moon at or near its present circular pattern around the earth. Just as an Apollo spacecraft circling the Earth every ninety minutes, while one hundred and sixty kilometers high, has to have a velocity of roughly twenty-nine thousand kilometers per hour to stay in orbit, so something has to give the moon the precisely required velocity for its weight and altitude.
The point – and it is one seldom noted in considering the origin of the moon – is that it is extremely unlikely that any object would just stumble into the right combination of factors required to stay in orbit. ‘Something’ had to put the moon at its altitude, on its course and at its speed. The question is: what was that something?”
In short, the moon violates so many known laws of physics and so many expectations of what is normal, that it is easier to explain the non-existence of the moon than its existence. In this light, Irwin Shapiro of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics stated, “The best explanation for the moon is observational error – the Moon doesn’t exist.” The moon is perfectly positioned to give us the type of world we live in. Is this just a cosmic coincidence?
The Sun is Not What It Seems, Either
The Sun is not what it seems, either. Have you seen this video with Nassim Haramein where some kind of gargantuan UFOs or unknown space crafts fly straight into the Sun? Listen to what Eric Dollard says about how the Sun is a very different entity to what we imagine. It is transmitting energy and information, rather than heat and light – we just decode that information as heat and light:
“(The Sun has) no inside structure. Only a surface. There is no inside structure … there is no fusion in the Sun … you only get fusion in the X-rays … They don’t know how the sun works. The Sun is a transformer; it transforms from some other dimension. It’s not burning anything. It’s a converter.”
:)
terragunn
21st October 2015, 03:47
What I saw today, in the mid-afternoon, supports a lot of my observational facts, as well as theories. The moon, visible in the mid-afternoon sky, was in half phase, mid section to what we we have been conditioned to term south. The sun, in its position at the time, was not southerly of the moon, but slightly north of the moon. And yet, only the mid to 'southern' half of the moon was illuminated. Should the light of the sun illuminate the moon (as many are conditioned to believe), then the illumination of the moon would result in a near fully illuminated moon, north to south, with only a slightly dark-ish hue on the furthest 'southern' portion.
Ultima Thule
21st October 2015, 04:02
The lunar wave is interesting, has anyone else replicated that footage?
Looked at one debunking video which makes a claim that the wave is atmospheric disturbance caused by aeroplane. I prefer that explanation - the wave is "real", but it is not in the moon per se. Instead it effects the image of the moon in our atmosphere.
UT
Ps. Re Terragunns post: I often find that it is hard to evaluate the very thing you refer to - when I look at the moon and the sun, I tend to forget the enormous distances that are involved. When thinking about the distances, it begins to make more sense. By only looking at them, is like asking an ant to estimate the size of a 20 story building from 1 cm distance to the wall of the first floor.
terragunn
21st October 2015, 04:34
The sun is a converter of the energy of the Creator Beings trapped in the computation Matrix. The sun gives life? Yes – our life! Reflecting back at us. The sun is not so much a collective consciousness as it is a technological device of collected energy – our energy. The sun is a construct of the A.I. (demiurge). Such houses our energy. The material plane houses our soul/memory complex. Both are integral parts of the computation Matrix.
The dark celestial body we perceive during eclipses is the celestial body of Anu/Yahweh/Jehovah/Yaldabaoth – whatever name one prefers to allocate to this social memory complex/sub-logos.
Yes, I know: more crazy ideas from terragunn.
terragunn
21st October 2015, 04:38
The lunar wave is interesting, has anyone else replicated that footage?
Looked at one debunking video which makes a claim that the wave is atmospheric disturbance caused by aeroplane. I prefer that explanation - the wave is "real", but it is not in the moon per se. Instead it effects the image of the moon in our atmosphere.
UT
Ps. Re Terragunns post: I often find that it is hard to evaluate the very thing you refer to - when I look at the moon and the sun, I tend to forget the enormous distances that are involved. When thinking about the distances, it begins to make more sense. By only looking at them, is like asking an ant to estimate the size of a 20 story building from 1 cm distance to the wall of the first floor.
Regardless of distance, greater or smaller, what I observed cannot be explained away or supported by the B.S. we have all been fed.
ghostrider
21st October 2015, 13:24
It's said the moon is a fragment of a planet struck by the destroyer comet , and was pulled through the dimension door following the comet , from our twin universe the Dal ... Over 4.5 billion years ago, and would have plenty of anomalies that science can't explain...
abmqa
21st October 2015, 13:38
The lunar wave is interesting, has anyone else replicated that footage?
Looked at one debunking video which makes a claim that the wave is atmospheric disturbance caused by aeroplane. I prefer that explanation - the wave is "real", but it is not in the moon per se. Instead it effects the image of the moon in our atmosphere
UT
Ps. Re Terragunns post: I often find that it is hard to evaluate the very thing you refer to - when I look at the moon and the sun, I tend to forget the enormous distances that are involved. When thinking about the distances, it begins to make more sense. By only looking at them, is like asking an ant to estimate the size of a 20 story building from 1 cm distance to the wall of the first floor.
Please visit the link below: you will find some interesting footage by multiple sources that makes one wonder wtf is going on with moon. It certainly has my interest...
https://www.youtube.com/user/Crrow777/videos
ghostrider
21st October 2015, 23:16
Interesting our little orbiting body so close and doesn't rotate yet it's attempt to pull away from Earth is what drives our ocean currents giving oxygen to sea life ... Pretty awesome design ... Mysteriously hanging around our neck of the woods...
terragunn
23rd October 2015, 08:17
AsNTmjlf1vI
Likewise: I saw the forest, where you saw only the trees...
ndroock1
28th June 2019, 08:56
"the Creator Beings" ? What are they? - What is a 'celestial body'? - Who is "Anu/Yahweh/Jehovah/Yaldabaoth"?
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.