Remote Viewing - JFK assassination

[Aurelius]

FarSight Institute's Remote Viewing Project of the JFK assassination (http://farsight.org/FarsightPress/JFK_Part1_main_page.html) (part 1 - "the shooters"), now released:

l2VT2zNLbmA

... interesting findings include:

- command & control centre location, where the assassination activities were coordinated from.

- thorough planning & preparations.

- use of encrypted radio communications (secret at the time).

- extra shooters lined-up, that never pulled the trigger, but were ready to do so.

- multiple teams working together, including details regarding individuals within the teams

- what JFK himself experienced

- how the shooters & overseers dispersed after the shooting






... part 2 "the organizers" now released:

tIzUiOj5XO4

[giovonni]

He want's $12.00 US to see it on vimeo ...

I'll pass.

[mgray]

Here's what I don't get with remote viewing.

What is the prompt for the viewers that sends them to Dallas in Nov. 1963? They both state they did not know they were viewing the Kennedy assassination.

How could that be and how do their own biases and knowledge of the event not create a bias.

I don't get it.

[Wide-Eyed]

mgray,Gio& PA: I have four years of IRVA- The International Remote Viewing Association's annual remote viewing conferences 2010-2013. Courtney Brown is a speaker every year along with the top remote viewers in the world today. I would be happy to share them with the forum. I am not sure how to upload them or if it would be kosher to do so, they were given to me by an IRVA board member, but I feel it would be a benefit to get them out there for as many to utilize as possible. They are very informative and describe the remote viewing process and their research. There are about 16-20 dvd's of speaker's presentations per year. If a member would advise via PM we could get this done?...

[Aurelius]

Here's what I don't get with remote viewing.

What is the prompt for the viewers that sends them to Dallas in Nov. 1963? They both state they did not know they were viewing the Kennedy assassination.

How could that be and how do their own biases and knowledge of the event not create a bias.

I don't get it.

this (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sgM6GLzw-6M) might help you ....

[cursichella1]

Here's what I don't get with remote viewing.

What is the prompt for the viewers that sends them to Dallas in Nov. 1963? They both state they did not know they were viewing the Kennedy assassination.

How could that be and how do their own biases and knowledge of the event not create a bias.

I don't get it.

The Remote Viewers are given blind targets (event/location) that correspond with a random alphanumeric, in this case I think it was E14. That's all they are given. They have no idea what the target is. These RVers work completely alone and independent of one another. They focus on the alphanumeric and perceive images, sights, sounds, scents, movement, etc., that are related to the target. The more time they spend on the target, the better the data they acquire and they put this down on paper (or drawing board). Sometimes during the RV the data they receive is so clear that they're able to clearly identify their specific target.

Most RVers operate with blind targets to keep the data clean, as with a scientific experiment or wine tasting (bags on the bottles). I have read about RVers who work on a target of which the event/location hasn't been chosen yet. For example, the RVer is given the target Z50. After the RV has completed his work, the target number Z50 is randomly given to a specific event/location, perhaps latitude/longitude, or coordinates on the Moon, running of the Bulls in Spain, whatever. Then the event/location is compared to the RVers data...pretty wild.

I've seen the JFK Part 1 video. Both Remote Viewers picked up on the event of JFK's assassination, with details on the shooters (including their appearance, location, thoughts about what they were doing), their teams, locations and organization. Also, details on how JFK was feeling in the seconds before, during and after.

These same two remote viewers RV'd 911 and what they came up with was unbelievably detailed. Both parts 1 and 2 of 911 were worth renting or buying, IMO. Part 2 of the JFK video should be very interesting. It focuses on the people that planned the assassination.

[Betty]

For free you can access AARC and the Mary Ferrell Foundation:
Read how Dr. Carrico inserted a endotracheal tube and then saw bubbles coming from a hole at the right base of the neck.
http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh6/html/WC_Vol6_0006a.htm
Read how Dr. Perry then performed a tracheotomy.
http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh6/html/WC_Vol6_0009a.htm
Read that Dr. Jones inserted a chest on the left and performed a cutdown in left antecubital space.
http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh6/html/WC_Vol6_0031a.htm
Read that Dr. Baxter inserted a chest tube on the right.
http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh6/html/WC_Vol6_0025a.htm
Read that Dr. Curtis performed a cutdown on one of JFK's legs but that this IV infiltrated but the other IV's were running so well that another cutdown was not performed.
http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh6/html/WC_Vol6_0034a.htm
Read that Dr. Humes stated the chest tube sites were only superficial and did not enter the chest cavity and that he explored these wounds carefully.
http://www.aarclibrary.org/publib/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh2/html/WC_Vol2_0178a.htm
The Parkland doctors states they connected the chest tubes to underwater drainage. They would have only connected the chest tubes to underwater drainage, if they had inserted the chest tubes into the chest.
At this website you can hear Carrico, Perry, and Humes. Dr. Humes attempts to talk about the medical wounds but is interupted by Dr. Petty and Dr. Boswell. The interaction goes by fast so you may have to read the transcript while you listen.
https://www.maryferrell.org/pages/HSCA_Medical_Interviews.html

[jake gittes]

Here's what I don't get with remote viewing.

What is the prompt for the viewers that sends them to Dallas in Nov. 1963? They both state they did not know they were viewing the Kennedy assassination.

How could that be and how do their own biases and knowledge of the event not create a bias.

I don't get it.

mgray-
I appreciate your skepticism and had the same questions. But as cursichella1 stated so well, the remote viewer is given just a series of numbers or letters. That's it. They don't have any idea what they're "viewing" so there's no way they would bring pre-conceived notions into the experience. I have also felt skepticism before for Courtney Brown, whom I was following for a while over a build-up to what was said to be an earth-shaking announcement -- which turned out to be that a DVD would be for sale. That was kind of like a "Be sure to drink your Ovaltine" moment for me.

However, the subject still intrigues me, so I followed a couple of links at rense about this very same subject, and listened to the audio of the program tonight because video is too slow at home. I was not disappointed. I also followed along with a couple of excellent photo collections that are discussed in the program. I recommend you give it a listen. Here are the links, two to the audio of the program, one to the remote viewer's sketches of his RV experience and Jim Marrs' photos:

http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_110415_hr2.mp3

http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_110415_hr3.mp3

http://www.rense.com/general96/jfkassassin.html

http://www.rense.com/general96/marrsphotos.html

In the program, Jim Marrs discusses JFK subject and remote viewing subjects, both of which he has investigated thoroughly. He said the movie "The Men Who Stare at Goats" was typical intel misdirection to laugh off a subject that had gotten some attention that they did not want attention given to.

[mgray]

Here's my question. So the RVs are given a prompt, which is a code of letters and/or numbers to avoid their bias during the sessions, and yet the two men deciphered the same event.

Does that not require a leap of faith that they RVed the same event?

[giovonni]

will share this here ...



From Courtney Brown's facebook page Sunday - 11/8/2015

Here is a REALLY great interview that Jim Marrs and Dick Allgire had on the Jeff Rense show about Farsight's new project on the JFK assassination! Jeff has allowed the entire show to be posted for free.

Listen here (http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_110415_hr2.mp3) / Related images (http://www.rense.com/general96/marrsphotos.html)


***


Also from Courtney Brown facebook page today 11/8/2015...

Thanks to Daz Smith who found this interesting article on the JFK assassination.

Mob hitman who says he was the man on the grassy knoll
and killed JFK to be released - and he still insists he did it
(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3308941/Mob-hitman-James-Files-stands-claims-man-responsible-President-John-F-Kennedy-s-assassination-prepares-release.html)

Related

Interview with James Files

From Wim Dankbaar



This video belongs exclusively to JFKMURDERDERSOLVED.COM and Wim Dankbaar. It is their exclusive copyrighted property and may not be duplicated, reproduced or copied in any manner, shape of form without their expressed written consent. Anyone violating this copyright shall be subject to criminal and civil action and may be subject to fines, damages and/or jail.

On the eve of the 40th Anniversary of the JFK Assassination, from Stateville Correctional Center, Joliet Illinois, confessed assassin James Earl Files tells of his role in The Crime of the Century.

In 1989, Houston private investigator Joe West launched an independent investigation to find the true assassins of President John F. Kennedy. After three years of disappointments and dead-ends, West received a tip from an unexpected source: an FBI agent who asked to remain nameless. The tip led Joe West to Stateville Correctional Center at Joliet Illinois, and a prisoner named James E. Files.

Files, who was serving time for attempted murder of an Illinois police officer, was at first, very reluctant to talk. Slowly and meticulously, West established a relationship with Files. Through months of personal visits and detailed correspondence, Files began to reveal his participation in the JFK assassination.

Files was nearing a full confession when West became ill and suddenly passed away in 1993. It took 13 months after Joe West's death, but on March 22, 1994, associates of West videotaped an interview with Files. It was during this interview that James Files first confessed to being the shooter on the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963, that it was he who delivered the final, fatal shot to JFK's right temple. He also implicated organized crime members Charles Nicoletti, Johnny Roselli and Sam Giancana, who all had been murdered in the 1970s.

For the next two frustrating years, attempts were made to bring the interview to the public. This finally led to an agreement for a nationwide TV program. As the program was being prepared, a consultant became involved. Based on his input, the program was suddenly cancelled for reasons that have since been proven to be untrue. Also, reputable JFK researchers have confirmed that the consultant was solidly connected to the Central Intelligence Agency.

Upon his retirement in 1998, the FBI agent who had given the original tip on James Files, decided to come forward. His name is Zack Shelton. Mr. Shelton, who worked organized crime for 28 years, has had an impeccable service record. With the financial support of Dutch businessman Wim Dankbaar, Shelton offered to proceed with a new investigation to either prove or disprove the confession of James E. Files. Shelton called upon and received the assistance of over ten of his veteran FBI colleagues. All of these men have had equally impressive careers with the Bureau.

While the FBI has officially declared James Files to be "not credible," the findings of Shelton and his colleagues have shown otherwise. After painstaking efforts to persuade Files, who had vowed to never again be interviewed, he ultimately agreed to another interview. The second and last interview was taped on November 19, 2003.

We now present that interview to you and leave the judgement of James E. Files and his confession in your hands.

Book: Files On JFK (http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/buy2.htm)

Published on Aug 7, 2015


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qr4vgHsmNEk

[Bill Ryan]

.
Hi, All:

Here are two very fascinating hours with Jim Marrs, Farsight Institute Remote Viewer Dick Allgire, and radio host Jeff Rense on 4 Nov, 2015 (just a few days ago).

http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_110415_hr2.mp3

http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_110415_hr3.mp3

Jim Marrs' important photos are an essential accompaniment to the show.
(copied from this page: http://rense.com/general96/marrsphotos.html)

JFK Assassination
From Jim Marrs
4 November 2015


http://www.rense.com/general96/newclipping.jpg

An article in the Dallas Morning News on August 21, 1978 citing several witnesses in Dealey, including police officers, who encountered men claiming to be Secret Service agents, although officially all agents were either in the motorcade or at the Trade Mart where Kennedy was scheduled to speak at a luncheon.

Interestingly enough, Lee Harvey Oswald said he encountered a man as he was leaving the book depository who said he was Secret Service and asked for the nearest telephone. Oswald said he stood and watched until the man went to a telephone in the depository.


http://www.rense.com/general96/JFKonMain0001.jpg

This is a seldom-seen photo of JFK on Main Street in Dallas emerging into Dealey Plaza. The motorcade will turn right onto Houston.

To the lower right is the north side of the Old Red Courthouse and the crowd of onlookers, Dick so adequately described.


http://www.rense.com/general96/GrassyKnollSmoke.jpg

For years supporters denied bystanders' statements claiming to have seen gun smoke drifting off the Grassy Knoll.

They claimed that modern rifles don't smoke. This is wrong, especially if a rifle has been recently oiled. The oil burns off at firing and becomes a puff of white smoke.

This smoke (circled at upper right) can be seen in this still frame from the Dave Wegman film drifting down from the Grassy Knoll.

The center circle shows Kennedy's limousine as it enters the Triple Underpass.


http://www.rense.com/general96/image(1b).jpeg

Press photographers, who had jumped out of the motorcade record the scene at the base of the Grassy Knoll, including the Bill Newman family.

Both Bill and Gayle Newman fell on their children to protect them from shots they said came from over and behind them on the knoll.

Despite their closeness to the President at the time of the fatal head shot, the Newmans were never questioned by the federal investigations or interviewed by major news media.


http://www.rense.com/general96/image(1).jpeg

After the shots, the crowd rushed to the Grassy Knoll...from where this photo was taken. In the upper right is a corner of the Old Red Courthouse.

Look carefully and you'll see two sections of the curb painted yellow…painted that very day. Exactly between the two stripes is the 'kill zone' where the fatal shot hit the President. In front of the far LEFT yellow curb section (how incredibly ironic) walking toward the camera is a man in a hat and a trench coat with his hands in his pockets.

That man is Watergate burglar and government operative E. Howard Hunt. This was verified by his son, St. John Hunt.


http://www.rense.com/general96/image(2).jpeg

This is the pergola atop the Grassy Knoll with people crouching after hearing the shots.

Similar monuments were on the east side of Dealey Plaza along with a statute of newspaper owner George Dealey.


http://www.rense.com/general96/plazasmall.jpg

Here's the plaza with the water ponds and Dealey Statue at center right. The light red brick building on the left is the Texas School Book Depository and the deep red building is the DalTex Building from where it is likely some shots were fired.


http://www.rense.com/general96/image(4).jpg

The first shots have been fired in this photo taken from the south side of the plaza but the head shot is still to come. The people moving in the foreground rushed deeper into the plaza from their position at the corner of Main and Houston Streets. They sought a second look at the President. In the background are the closest witnesses to the head shot.


http://www.rense.com/general96/image(5).jpg

The first shots have been fired in this photo but the head shot is still to come. From left, the Newman family holding their children on the north side of Elm.

On the south side are Mary Moorman in the black raincoat and Jean Hill in the red. To their right is Charles Brehm and his son and Beverly Oliver, who was merely called the Babushka Lady for years until her identity became known. Under the right end of the pergola stand a man lofting an umbrella, although it was a bright warm day, and man in a light-colored jacket raiding his fist in the air. These two suspicious men were never identified for many years.

Some researchers believe these men were visual coordinators on the scene to signal if more shots were needed to prevent Kennedy from leaving the plaza alive.

[Bill Ryan]

http://www.rense.com/general96/unnamed%2819%29.jpg

This is a photo of the press bus passing through Dealey Plaza moments after the shooting. In the foreground with his hands in the pockets of his jump suit is James Hicks who admitted to New Orleans Dist. Atty. Jim Garrison that he was one of the radio coordinators.

In a version of this photo with less contrast you can actually see the radio in his hip pocket.


http://www.rense.com/general96/Keellerman%27shair.gif

Most all men in 1963 wore hair grease (many chose Vitalis). I think I was wearing some sort of pink pommade for my crew cut.

This went for the Secret Service agents too. This is why SS agents Kellerman and the driver Greer had sun glints on their heads in Zapruder film Frame 314 as you can see in this frame from the Zapruder film. This is what many people thought was a pistol wielded by Greer. But his hands were always on the steering wheel, although he did look over his right shoulder at Kennedy until after the fatal head shot. This action is contrary to his official testimony in which he stated he never looked back.


http://www.rense.com/general96/bushbook.jpg

Here's is a photo taken in front of the Texas School Book Depository moments after the JFK assassination.

The figure circled at the extreme left is thought to be G.H.W. Bush. Here are two comparisons of this man and a photo of Bush circa 1963.

http://www.rense.com/general96/Bush.jpg

This is a graphic done by researcher Richard Hooke who thought that one young man in the Dealey Plaza crowd resembled George W. Bush.

Hooke suspected that the elder Bush brought along his son to witness the events of that day.

http://www.rense.com/general96/hwb.jpg


http://www.rense.com/general96/redcourt.jpg

Here is an original photo of the Old Red Courthouse complete with tall center tower as depicted by Dick Allgire.

~~~~~

Excerpt from Jim Marrs' definitive book CROSSFIRE (http://www.amazon.com/Crossfire-Plot-That-Killed-Kennedy/dp/0465031803)...

(Here is what one witness, Ed Hoffman, described seeing behind the picket fence on the Grassy Knoll. It corresponds well with your viewing. This from my book "Crossfire.")

Virgil Edward Hoffman, born deaf, was twenty-six years old on November 22, 1963, and at noontime was driving toward downtown Dallas on the Stemmons Freeway when he noticed numerous people lining the freeway. He suddenly realized that President Kennedy was to motorcade through the city that day, so he stopped his car just north of a railroad bridge across Stemmons and joined the spectators.

After waiting for a time, Hoffman decided to walk along the shoulder of the freeway to a point where it crossed over Elm Street in hopes of getting a view into Dealey Plaza. From this vantage point, Hoffman was approximately two hundred yards west of the parking lot behind the picket fence at an elevation of about the height of the first floor of the Texas School Book Depository.

Being unable to hear, he was not aware that Kennedy's motorcade was passing through the plaza. However, he was aware of movement on the north side of the picket fence. He became aware of a man running west along the back side of the fence wearing a dark suit and a tie. The man was carrying a rifle in his hands. As the man reached a metal-pipe railing at the west end of the fence, he tossed the rifle to a second man standing on the west side of the pipe near the railroad tracks that went south over the Triple Underpass. The second man was wearing light coveralls and a railroad worker's hat.

The second man caught the rifle, ducked behind a large railroad switch box—one of two at that site—and knelt down. The man disassembled the rifle, placed it in a soft brown bag (Hoffman's description matches that of the traditional railroad brakeman's tool bag), then walked nonchalantly north into the rail yards in the general direction of the railroad tower containing Lee Bowers.

The man in the suit, meanwhile, had turned and run back along the picket fence until midway, when he stopped and began walking calmly toward the corner of the fence. Hoffman could not see the corner due to cars and overhanging tree branches.

Unable to hear, Hoffman was at a loss to understand what was happening as he watched these men.

[Bill Ryan]

.
For those wanting to save these important photos, with Jim Marrs' annotated commentary, a complete PDF is here:

http://projectavalon.net/Jim_Marrs_Kennedy_assassination_photos_Jeff_Rense_4_Nov_2015.pdf

[giovonni]

That's great Bill, but i beat you to it last evening ... :)

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?86499-Remote-Viewing-JFK-assassination&p=1017800&viewfull=1#post1017800


will share this here ...



From Courtney Brown's facebook page Sunday - 11/8/2015

Here is a REALLY great interview that Jim Marrs and Dick Allgire had on the Jeff Rense show about Farsight's new project on the JFK assassination! Jeff has allowed the entire show to be posted for free.

Listen here (http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_110415_hr2.mp3) / Related images (http://www.rense.com/general96/marrsphotos.html)


***


Also from Courtney Brown facebook page today 11/8/2015...

Thanks to Daz Smith who found this interesting article on the JFK assassination.

Mob hitman who says he was the man on the grassy knoll
and killed JFK to be released - and he still insists he did it
(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3308941/Mob-hitman-James-Files-stands-claims-man-responsible-President-John-F-Kennedy-s-assassination-prepares-release.html)

Related

Interview with James Files

From Wim Dankbaar



This video belongs exclusively to JFKMURDERDERSOLVED.COM and Wim Dankbaar. It is their exclusive copyrighted property and may not be duplicated, reproduced or copied in any manner, shape of form without their expressed written consent. Anyone violating this copyright shall be subject to criminal and civil action and may be subject to fines, damages and/or jail.

On the eve of the 40th Anniversary of the JFK Assassination, from Stateville Correctional Center, Joliet Illinois, confessed assassin James Earl Files tells of his role in The Crime of the Century.

In 1989, Houston private investigator Joe West launched an independent investigation to find the true assassins of President John F. Kennedy. After three years of disappointments and dead-ends, West received a tip from an unexpected source: an FBI agent who asked to remain nameless. The tip led Joe West to Stateville Correctional Center at Joliet Illinois, and a prisoner named James E. Files.

Files, who was serving time for attempted murder of an Illinois police officer, was at first, very reluctant to talk. Slowly and meticulously, West established a relationship with Files. Through months of personal visits and detailed correspondence, Files began to reveal his participation in the JFK assassination.

Files was nearing a full confession when West became ill and suddenly passed away in 1993. It took 13 months after Joe West's death, but on March 22, 1994, associates of West videotaped an interview with Files. It was during this interview that James Files first confessed to being the shooter on the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963, that it was he who delivered the final, fatal shot to JFK's right temple. He also implicated organized crime members Charles Nicoletti, Johnny Roselli and Sam Giancana, who all had been murdered in the 1970s.

For the next two frustrating years, attempts were made to bring the interview to the public. This finally led to an agreement for a nationwide TV program. As the program was being prepared, a consultant became involved. Based on his input, the program was suddenly cancelled for reasons that have since been proven to be untrue. Also, reputable JFK researchers have confirmed that the consultant was solidly connected to the Central Intelligence Agency.

Upon his retirement in 1998, the FBI agent who had given the original tip on James Files, decided to come forward. His name is Zack Shelton. Mr. Shelton, who worked organized crime for 28 years, has had an impeccable service record. With the financial support of Dutch businessman Wim Dankbaar, Shelton offered to proceed with a new investigation to either prove or disprove the confession of James E. Files. Shelton called upon and received the assistance of over ten of his veteran FBI colleagues. All of these men have had equally impressive careers with the Bureau.

While the FBI has officially declared James Files to be "not credible," the findings of Shelton and his colleagues have shown otherwise. After painstaking efforts to persuade Files, who had vowed to never again be interviewed, he ultimately agreed to another interview. The second and last interview was taped on November 19, 2003.

We now present that interview to you and leave the judgement of James E. Files and his confession in your hands.

Book: Files On JFK (http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/buy2.htm)

Published on Aug 7, 2015


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qr4vgHsmNEk

[Atlas]

From The Ultimate Book of Unsolved Mysteries (http://www.fivemile.com.au/catalog/non-fiction/ultimate-book-unsolved-mysteries):
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44908464/avalon/predictions/276.gif
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44908464/avalon/predictions/277.gif
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44908464/avalon/predictions/278.gif
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44908464/avalon/predictions/279.jpg
Read more: The Shooting of Ronald Reagan Foretold (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?86679-The-Shooting-of-Ronald-Reagan-Foretold&p=1017940&viewfull=1#post1017940)

[Bill Ryan]

Here are two very fascinating hours with Jim Marrs, Farsight Institute Remote Viewer Dick Allgire, and radio host Jeff Rense on 4 Nov, 2015 (just a few days ago).

http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_110415_hr2.mp3

http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_110415_hr3.mp3

Jim Marrs' important photos are an essential accompaniment to the show.
(copied from this page: http://rense.com/general96/marrsphotos.html)

Of the two Rense radio hours linked, the second one is the one containing the key information. Listing to it now with great interest.

I have to say. Dick Allgire (the Farsight RVer) is clearly VERY good at what he does.

[ThePythonicCow]

Here's what I don't get with remote viewing.

What is the prompt for the viewers that sends them to Dallas in Nov. 1963? They both state they did not know they were viewing the Kennedy assassination.

How could that be and how do their own biases and knowledge of the event not create a bias.

I don't get it.

I have a long standing suspicion that remote viewing really works by mental telepathy ... between the viewer and one or more subject matter experts.

For example, in these cases of remote viewing the JFK assassination, there always seems to be someone, such as Jim Marrs himself, who is connected directly or indirectly with the viewer, and someone (perhaps the same person as the expert) involved in deciding what the special number or coordinates were actually targeting was connected to (or the same person as) the person who handed the special number or coordinates to the viewer.

Given sufficient telepathy, perhaps not realizing it, the viewer is connected to expert(s) who know most of what is viewed, and is also connected to people who know that's the target.

In the simplest case, such as an example Jim Marrs tells in the above Jeff Rense audio, there are only two people, the viewer who has well developed telepathic skills, and Jim Marrs, who writes a number on a piece of paper that means to him the JFK assassination to the viewer.

[Selene]

I have a long standing suspicion that remote viewing really works by mental telepathy ... between the viewer and one or more subject matter experts.

For example, in these cases of remote viewing the JFK assassination, there always seems to be someone, such as Jim Marrs himself, who is connected directly or indirectly with the viewer, and someone (perhaps the same person as the expert) involved in deciding what the special number or coordinates were actually targeting was connected to (or the same person as) the person who handed the special number or coordinates to the viewer.

Given sufficient telepathy, perhaps not realizing it, the viewer is connected to expert(s) who know most of what is viewed, and is also connected to people who know that's the target.



I think you are essentially correct, Paul, at least as far as formal, military-style remote viewing protocols are concerned. Telepathy can certainly be a factor. That’s because, in order for an RV session to proceed, someone has to have designated a target or objective.

And that means that somebody “knows” – or wants to know – something about that target. And if the connection between that task setter and the RV’er is a close one – they are in the same room, or good friends or some such – the potential for a telepathic link is fairly high. And this *could* present a contaminating factor.

But I don't think that telepathy as such really solves the RV'ing issue or method in toto. Where it gets complicated and fuzzy and the simple telepathy theory falls apart is when you start going into quantum viewings – that is, the target is selected after the RV session has been completed. This has been done successfully and some people are rather good at that.

Telepathy also fails to account for undirected or spontaneous remote viewing – the type that I do. I can unilaterally decide to ‘look’ somewhere, ‘travel’ somewhere, see something without anyone else to direct me. And then I verify the session by checking up in a normal way to the extent that I can. I like to seek feedback; even though I can sense when I’ve ‘locked onto’ a target and can have a fair degree of accuracy after that. I also enjoy looking into wrapped packages and sealed envelopes because then I can open them and get the feedback for accuracy right away. :sun:

(Hint to RV'ing students: If you still receive holiday mail, try to 'look' into the envelope before you open it. Describe the predominant colors, the images, the keywords, etc before you open the envelope. Does the inevitable newsletter contain any new information? Etc. Play, have fun, let yourself go. Trust your first impression.)

But unless I’m mistaken, one of Courtney’s Farsight viewers is a member here – perhaps they could comment further? Their views would be most valuable.

Cheers,

Selene

[ThePythonicCow]

But I don't think that telepathy as such really solves the RV'ing issue or method in toto.
Now ... if only I could remote view these other such remote viewings as you describe, and validate them, and their underlying mechanisms, to my own satisfaction :).

[giovonni]

the latest ...

Courtney Brown - Death in Dallas: Remote Viewing JFK

From LegaliseFreedom1



Farsight Institute director Courtney Brown discusses their latest remote viewing project The JFK Assassination. The assassination of US president John F. Kennedy on November 22nd, 1963 remains one of the most controversial events in world history. The official story – that Kennedy was killed by a lone gunman acting alone – has been hotly disputed almost from the start. Indeed, along with the Apollo moon missions and the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the JFK assassination has been the popular subject of numerous so-called ‘conspiracy theories’ as everyone from serious researchers to outright cranks formulate their own version of the fateful day’s events.

Having previously used their skills to probe deeper into mysteries such as the existence of extraterrestrial life, the legendary island of Atlantis, and the aforementioned 9/11 attacks, Farsight’s remote viewers now turn their attention to JFK’s violent demise. Part one of The JFK Assassination focusses on the assassins themselves, while part two exposes the shadowy figures who planned the killing. Even a cursory review of that deadly day in Dallas reveals an official narrative shot through with gaping holes. Reaching beyond the bounds of time and space, the remote viewing data reveals chilling new details of a murder that lives on in infamy.

Published on Nov 11, 2015


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quFiKItJp-M&feature=em-uploademail

[Omni]

Can these remote viewers actually remote view something that can be proven? I've seen tons of RVers say obscure stuff that can't be proven either way. This provides a safety net for delusions IMO. I am not saying they are incorrect, however I am saying I see evidence these people cannot actually remote view freely when not a single one can say, tell me 5 things on my computer desk... But they all have something to say about unverifiable stuffs. Please forgive my perhaps overly 'scientific' view of this for some people...


Also I'd like to note: Personally after knowing what technology can do, paired with the targeting realities on planet Earth, I would say any remote viewers findings are suspect and liable to be technological manipulation.

CIA scientist whistleblower Dr. Robert Duncan says the natural remote viewing stuff people talk about in military programs were actually a cover for technological remote viewing. I could see them fooling some people they were naturally RVing too to perpetuate the cover.

My own experiences with targeting at the very least show me people who would be gifted enough to actually view sensitive video of other people places and times(essentially able to view all their deepest secrets a huge flippin deal), would be targeted. So with all that considered, I'd say I do not trust a single remote viewer on the planet to give me accuracy more than I would trust traditional research. I realize this may be an unpopular view but it is my view nontheless and I think it's a valid view...

[Flash]

what about people to whom you give someone's name and location, and from a distance, they see their past present and futur?

Or better, what about people to whom you give someone's name and they see at distance whatever sickness the person has? And this one can be proven. My sister saw a clairvoyant lately and being a full blown skeptic, she was amazed at waht the woman told her about her spouse (liver problems, eyes problems etc all diagnosed the previous week). My sister never hinted at any of these. Is this remote viewing?

I do think all those are remote viewing with different applications though.

And believe me Omni, none of them, clairvoyant or my sister and spouse, are Worth being targetted.

[giovonni]

will bump this ...


the latest ...

Courtney Brown - Death in Dallas: Remote Viewing JFK

From LegaliseFreedom1



Farsight Institute director Courtney Brown discusses their latest remote viewing project The JFK Assassination. The assassination of US president John F. Kennedy on November 22nd, 1963 remains one of the most controversial events in world history. The official story – that Kennedy was killed by a lone gunman acting alone – has been hotly disputed almost from the start. Indeed, along with the Apollo moon missions and the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the JFK assassination has been the popular subject of numerous so-called ‘conspiracy theories’ as everyone from serious researchers to outright cranks formulate their own version of the fateful day’s events.

Having previously used their skills to probe deeper into mysteries such as the existence of extraterrestrial life, the legendary island of Atlantis, and the aforementioned 9/11 attacks, Farsight’s remote viewers now turn their attention to JFK’s violent demise. Part one of The JFK Assassination focusses on the assassins themselves, while part two exposes the shadowy figures who planned the killing. Even a cursory review of that deadly day in Dallas reveals an official narrative shot through with gaping holes. Reaching beyond the bounds of time and space, the remote viewing data reveals chilling new details of a murder that lives on in infamy.

Published on Nov 11, 2015


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=quFiKItJp-M&feature=em-uploademail

[Aurelius]

here is an EXCELLENT presentation, that gets into the innards of future science, which includes Remote Viewing:

rHH5PBS2H_I

[jake gittes]

That's great Bill, but i beat you to it last evening ... :)

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?86499-Remote-Viewing-JFK-assassination&p=1017800&viewfull=1#post1017800



Yeah, but I beat you to it two days (and two posts) prior! :) http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?86499-Remote-Viewing-JFK-assassination&p=1017244&viewfull=1#post1017244

[giovonni]

will share this here ...



From Courtney Brown's facebook page Sunday - 11/8/2015

Here is a REALLY great interview that Jim Marrs and Dick Allgire had on the Jeff Rense show about Farsight's new project on the JFK assassination! Jeff has allowed the entire show to be posted for free.

Listen here (http://rense.gsradio.net:8080/rense/special/rense_110415_hr2.mp3) / Related images (http://www.rense.com/general96/marrsphotos.html)


***


Also from Courtney Brown facebook page today 11/8/2015...

Thanks to Daz Smith who found this interesting article on the JFK assassination.

Mob hitman who says he was the man on the grassy knoll
and killed JFK to be released - and he still insists he did it
(http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3308941/Mob-hitman-James-Files-stands-claims-man-responsible-President-John-F-Kennedy-s-assassination-prepares-release.html)

Related

Interview with James Files

From Wim Dankbaar



This video belongs exclusively to JFKMURDERDERSOLVED.COM and Wim Dankbaar. It is their exclusive copyrighted property and may not be duplicated, reproduced or copied in any manner, shape of form without their expressed written consent. Anyone violating this copyright shall be subject to criminal and civil action and may be subject to fines, damages and/or jail.

On the eve of the 40th Anniversary of the JFK Assassination, from Stateville Correctional Center, Joliet Illinois, confessed assassin James Earl Files tells of his role in The Crime of the Century.

In 1989, Houston private investigator Joe West launched an independent investigation to find the true assassins of President John F. Kennedy. After three years of disappointments and dead-ends, West received a tip from an unexpected source: an FBI agent who asked to remain nameless. The tip led Joe West to Stateville Correctional Center at Joliet Illinois, and a prisoner named James E. Files.

Files, who was serving time for attempted murder of an Illinois police officer, was at first, very reluctant to talk. Slowly and meticulously, West established a relationship with Files. Through months of personal visits and detailed correspondence, Files began to reveal his participation in the JFK assassination.

Files was nearing a full confession when West became ill and suddenly passed away in 1993. It took 13 months after Joe West's death, but on March 22, 1994, associates of West videotaped an interview with Files. It was during this interview that James Files first confessed to being the shooter on the grassy knoll in Dealey Plaza on November 22, 1963, that it was he who delivered the final, fatal shot to JFK's right temple. He also implicated organized crime members Charles Nicoletti, Johnny Roselli and Sam Giancana, who all had been murdered in the 1970s.

For the next two frustrating years, attempts were made to bring the interview to the public. This finally led to an agreement for a nationwide TV program. As the program was being prepared, a consultant became involved. Based on his input, the program was suddenly cancelled for reasons that have since been proven to be untrue. Also, reputable JFK researchers have confirmed that the consultant was solidly connected to the Central Intelligence Agency.

Upon his retirement in 1998, the FBI agent who had given the original tip on James Files, decided to come forward. His name is Zack Shelton. Mr. Shelton, who worked organized crime for 28 years, has had an impeccable service record. With the financial support of Dutch businessman Wim Dankbaar, Shelton offered to proceed with a new investigation to either prove or disprove the confession of James E. Files. Shelton called upon and received the assistance of over ten of his veteran FBI colleagues. All of these men have had equally impressive careers with the Bureau.

While the FBI has officially declared James Files to be "not credible," the findings of Shelton and his colleagues have shown otherwise. After painstaking efforts to persuade Files, who had vowed to never again be interviewed, he ultimately agreed to another interview. The second and last interview was taped on November 19, 2003.

We now present that interview to you and leave the judgement of James E. Files and his confession in your hands.

Book: Files On JFK (http://www.jfkmurdersolved.com/buy2.htm)

Published on Aug 7, 2015


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qr4vgHsmNEk



That's great Bill, but i beat you to it last evening ... :)

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?86499-Remote-Viewing-JFK-assassination&p=1017800&viewfull=1#post1017800



Yeah, but I beat you to it two days (and two posts) prior! :) http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?86499-Remote-Viewing-JFK-assassination&p=1017244&viewfull=1#post1017244

But mine's from Courtney ...

And as far as beating me you got a lot of catching up to do ... ;)

[sunshaker]

Edit:Deleted, Sorry off topic.

[Aurelius]

part 2 "the organizers" now released:

tIzUiOj5XO4

[Aurelius]

attacks from within:

ff4ronLpUW0

.... anyone who see's the benefit of the work the FarSight Institute (http://farsight.org/) is doing, please donate (http://farsight.org/helping.html) to their legal fund, to allow them to continue their good work.

[Atlas]

http://blog.midtowncomics.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Superman2.jpg
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/44908464/avalon/people/kennedy/kennedy-superman.gif

https://thanley.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/action309jfkb.jpg

https://ogatoalfarrabista.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/supermans-mission-by-kennedy.jpg
https://ogatoalfarrabista.wordpress.com/tag/mort-weisinger/

[Betty]

Well I finally coughed up the $15 and bought the video. Glad I did, but I very much disagree with Courtney Brown's conclusions.
1. The shooter on top of the Dallas Record Building was Harry Weatherford. Harry belonged to Dallas county sheriff's office. I believe he was a deputy sheriff. He testified to the Warren Commission that he was simply on the sidewalk. Roger Craig wrote a small newspaper article stating that Harry was on top of the Records building. Sheriff Boyles also stated Harry was on top of the Records building. Harry's angle was way off to think that he shot at the president but his purpose was probably creating the sound of gunfire and thus distracting the crowd so they couldn't see what actually happened.
2. There was a shooter in the 6th floor of the Texas Schoolbook depository but that shooter never shot Kennedy. He shot Connolly. There is a TV program that states they reinforce the Oswald story but if you actually look at their recreation of the famous shot you'll see the bullet that allegedly goes into Kennedy's back actually comes out the chest. This bullet in the recreation that comes out the chest lacks energy to do the damage that the actual bullet did to Connolly on 11/22/63. The program's producers totally ignore this fact. If the bullet doesn't go through Kennedy's back it has enough energy to actually do the damage it did to Connolly.
To the relief of the conspirators, JFK's back was never examined at Parkland. The official autopsy that was done was not done on Kennedy because Kennedy had chest tubes and IV's inserted at Parkland and the body that was autopsied never had chest tubes or IVs inserted.
3. The Grassy Knoll was a diversion. Diversion is taught day one at Langley. The angle of a shot fired from the Grassy Knoll that would have hit Kennedy would have come out the left rear of his head. There is a YouTube video that demonstrates this but I'm too tired to hyperlink.
4. In Daz Smith's presentation at first he kept the arrow's to the left and right front of the car. At the end he changed those arrows to head on and directly to the side. Directly ahead of the limo was the lead car. If you blow up (to 400%) the photo of the secret agent who climbed on the trunk of the limo you'll see someone sitting backwards in the rear seat of the lead car. I mean they are not even twisting backwards they are totally facing backwards. Next to this person it looks like a white line cut out of a man with a hat. I approached Jim Fetzer with this finding in spring of 2011. It sounded like he had never heard of this before but in May 2015 he wrote in his blog that many researchers knew about this man facing backwards and Fetzer included a version of this picture with a distorted white line in the back window and he said the colors had bled. His picture is different then any other copy of that Altgen's photo I have ever seen.
My hypothesis is that a projectile was fired by someone through the back window of the lead car. There was a car in '63 called the Mercury Breezeway. The Mercury Breezeway had a rear window that rolled down by a push of button by the driver. The secret service car that followed LBJ was definitely a Mercury Breezeway. The lead car did not show the metal stabilizers that the typical Mercury Breezeway had but I believed those stabilizers could be taken out for concealment. The rolled down rear window was used before the advent of car air conditioning.
The projectile went through the front window of the limo hitting Kennedy in the throat. For the hole in the front windshield of the limo you'll have to reference Doug Weldon's work.
Paralyzing a victim before the kill is about as old as you can get.
4. The energy represented by Daz Smith's arrow from the side, I believe, is from umbrella man. There are many pictures of umbrella man and signal man. Umbrella man caused the shot, the energy came from him. He raised and lowered his umbrella to send a subliminal signal for Jackie to shoot the president in the left temple. Daz Smith kept saying there was a female component that was hidden from him.
Why do I say the left temple? Dr. McCelland wrote in his summarizing note after caring for JFK at Parkland stated the president had died from a gun shot entering the left temple and exiting the right parietal area. McCelland would later recant saying he just wrote what Dr. Jenkins told him. Jenkins stated in his Warren Commission testimony that he felt for a pulse but felt what he thought was a bullet hole in the left temple. Specter told Jenkins that the autopsy showed no bullet hole in the left temple. Of course we now know the autopsy was not of JFK.
Jackie's backround is very curious. Her cousin John Davis wrote in his book George Demohrenshildt (a white Russian) was a favorite of Jackie's growing up. The very same man that was Oswald's best friend. Also very curious is that Jackie was propelled to debutante of the year by a white Russian, Igor Cassini. Igor praised her in his newspaper column "Cholly Knickerbocker". Igor's brother Oleg Cassini would later become Jackie's dress designer.
Jackie at the age of about 22? won a trip to Europe from Vogue magazine for an essay she had written. She would turn down this trip because she was offered a job from the CIA. She would also say her mother didn't want her to go. It is never said that she actually took this job with the CIA but instead of going to Europe she took a job to be a Camera girl for a newspaper. She interviewed some celebrities including John Kennedy and Richard Nixon. This Camera girl job would be a perfect cover job for a CIA agent. As an agent she would have developed skills of getting men to talk to her and then being able to examine what they said to know if they were "yes" men, leaders, followers or whatever type of men they were. These are the exact skills that JFK relied on Jackie to tell him after she talked to men at various dinner parties or other affairs. So did she learn these skills on her own or did she learn them from the CIA?
I believe the CIA had mind control over Jackie. This mind control would have started in her childhood from her relationship with George Demohrenshildt, then when she applied for the job with the CIA. The CIA would also have had access to her if Oleg Cassini cooperated when Jackie would have had dress fittings. (Yes that 's quite a leap, but it just makes sense)
Two things to clarify about George Demohrenshildt. Davis's book makes it clear her relationship with Demohrenshildt was through her father not her mother initially. Even though after the assassination Jackie's mother Janet would have George Demohrenshildt and his wife over for dinner.
Demohrenshildt also had a brother Dimitri who was in the CIA.
Also, I didn't say where Jackie got the gun. Jackie received something white that she carried under the roses she was given at Love Field. Some say it was a bouquet of Chrysanthemums and some say it was a Lamb Chop puppet. I believe it was a puppet and that the gun was in that puppet.
Dick states there were walkie talkie's used. There is a picture of signal man with a walkie talkie. Also it has been said LBJ was communicating via walkie talkie that day.