PDA

View Full Version : FDA pulls common pain med off the market



daledo
30th November 2010, 23:05
http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/11/19/fda.removes.drug/index.html?iref=obnetwork

By the CNN Wire StaffNovember 19, 2010 2:40 p.m. EST
STORY HIGHLIGHTS

Darvon, Darvocet brands pulled along with generics
FDA concerned about heart rhythms
Generic versions a concern, too
Washington (CNN) -- The pharmaceutical company that makes the prescription pain medications Darvon and Darvocet has agreed to withdraw the drugs from the U.S. market at the request of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the FDA said Friday.

The FDA says the drug, propoxyphene, puts patients at risk of potentially serious or fatal heart rhythm abnormalities. Since 2009, 10 million people have been prescribed some form of the drug."We recommend to physicians stop prescribing the drugs. As for patients, do not stop taking it, but we urge you to contact your health care professional. Do not delay," said Gerald Dal Pan, director of the FDA's Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology.

Xanodyne Pharmaceuticals Inc. manufactures Darvon and Darvocet, two brand name versions of propoxyphene. The FDA also asked generic makers of the pain medicine to voluntarily remove their products.

The decision to remove the drug came after the FDA reviewed a new trial study that looked at the drug's impact on heart rhythms.

"The drug's effectiveness in reducing pain is no longer enough to outweigh the drug's serious potential heart risks," the FDA said in a statement released Friday.
Propoxyphene, first approved by the FDA in 1957, is an opioid used to treat mild to moderate pain. It is sold under various names both alone, such as Darvon, or in combination with acetaminophen, such as Darvocet.

Since 1978, the FDA has received two requests to remove propoxyphene from the market, but concluded that the benefits of propoxyphene for pain relief at recommended doses outweighed the safety risks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WOW... you can learn so much if you undestand and can process what you read.
1. They are admitting that they knew of the dangers but the benefits seemed to outweigh the dangers. They can skew ANY report or findings by playing with the numbers to make the outcome in their favor. Folks... this is just a numbers game. They couldn't fidge the numbers anymore.

2. They now cannot hide this from the public and finally ask for a voluntary recall which the manufactures agreed to. However the prescriptions that have been prescribed should not be stopped by the patients. WTF We know it causes problems but we want to protect the pharm companies so you need to call your doc to get another dangerous drug replacement for Darvocet. In the meantime lets just hope that you dont have any problems with the script.

I am soooo fed up with the lies in this trillion dollar scheme of the elite. When are people going to demand accountability of the manufactures for producing this toxic poison? Detoxing and eliminating toxins from further entering the body will help the body more than any prescription that you could ever take. Live naturally and say no to the corporations.

Ross
30th November 2010, 23:10
"We recommend to physicians stop prescribing the drugs. As for patients, do not stop taking it, but we urge you to contact your health care professional. Do not delay,


Say what?:crazy:

DawgBone
30th November 2010, 23:15
The FDA, the agency that approved aspartame after it caused brain tumors in rats.

Do these people have our best interests at heart?

daledo
30th November 2010, 23:16
"We recommend to physicians stop prescribing the drugs. As for patients, do not stop taking it, but we urge you to contact your health care professional. Do not delay,


Say what?:crazy:

I know Ross... confusing. Reminds me of the Hep B vaccine. They said they needed to take the mercury out of it because of the dangers but it was OK for them to administer the shots that they already produced. Same old bulls#it to me.

Ross
30th November 2010, 23:42
The FDA, the agency that approved aspartame after it caused brain tumors in rats.

Do these people have our best interests at heart?

no! we are revenue collectors for them and victims of poisoning. The word 'healer' is fast becoming extinct.

daledo
30th November 2010, 23:48
The word 'healer' is fast becoming extinct.

Very true... legally it is imposible to ever make a claim to heal or cure anyone. It is a crime to cure in America.

Carmody
1st December 2010, 00:10
I know Ross... confusing. Reminds me of the Hep B vaccine. They said they needed to take the mercury out of it because of the dangers but it was OK for them to administer the shots that they already produced. Same old bulls#it to me.

Not really.

You are a cow, a commodity, a liability, and an asset when they want something. But still, at the heart of it, treated and thought of as a beast. If not, then each life would be individually weighted and worth something. But no....Treated like a rabbling mob.

You are welcome for the uplifting message! :p

Ross
1st December 2010, 00:15
Very true... legally it is imposible to ever make a claim to heal or cure anyone. It is a crime to cure in America.

This sadley is the truth...

Ahkenaten
1st December 2010, 00:50
The true eyeopener for me was when some years ago I started reading labels on drugs and other stuff and noticed that the same companies make the drugs that are used for "birth control" that is spermicides, etc. also manufacture materiels used for killing weeds, insects, microbes, and rats and other PESTS. The same 'medicines' - just one example is Warfarin, are used to kill rats (without a RX) but also are used as a 'blood thinner' in human beings with cardiovascular disease. These same companies manufacture biological warfare agents and one, I.G. Farben, manufactured ZYCLON B used in the concentration camps in Germany. With the consolidation of the pharmaceutical industry there are left standing only a few of these giant conglomerates.............who also have their hands in the business of controlling the food supply by genetically manipulating plants so that they only reach maturity and produce fruits in the presence of their chemical 'fertilizers' and 'pesticides.' The truth is that there have been NO DRAMATIC MAJOR pharmacological break-throughs that positively effect human health outcomes since the invention of penicillin. NONE. These companies are in the business of disease and death and then boosting profits by making up patented concoctions with questionable value that are MARKETED as curing or stabilizing various conditions with little or no oversight by any regulatory agency.

conk
1st December 2010, 15:58
It must not be making much money for them, so they throw us a bone in the form of banning this poisonous substance. If the FDA really worked as planned 90% of drugs would be off the market. The logic is absurd. Drugs block or inhibit natural bodily processes. Why would anyone do this to themselves?

Fredkc
1st December 2010, 16:41
The truth is that there have been NO DRAMATIC MAJOR pharmacological break-throughs that positively effect human health outcomes since the invention of penicillin. NONE. These companies are in the business of disease and death and then boosting profits by making up patented concoctions with questionable value that are MARKETED as curing or stabilizing various conditions with little or no oversight by any regulatory agency.
Same question I asked in a previous thread:
When was the last time someone offered a cure, instead of a 'treatment'?
"It's not personal, it's just business." - Michael Corleone

Alternate view to this news:
It's a win/win for the FDA/Pharma.
1. They get to look like good guys by taking something off the market.
2. what the hell... The patent expired years ago, so any company can make the stuff for peanuts. Take it off the market via government and it forces people to switch to something more..... "attractive" from a marketing standpoint. Meaning, more expensive. "Better", "safer", etc are just relative terms.
Fred

Ba-ba-Ra
1st December 2010, 17:32
When they say "practicing" medicine. They mean it. They are practicing on the public.

Health is like everything else - look inward first for cures - and then outward, (on your own) do some research. It's important not to hand your life over to someone else, especially someone you know as little about as your doctor - and certainly not a pharmaceutical company.

Eliminate stress, eat healthy, think healthy, get fresh air and exercise. That will be $60, please. I take checks;)

kinsuemei2
1st December 2010, 18:48
FDA one goal in mind! Increase share holder profits, and who cares if Celebrex kills people, or Gardisil sterilizes young girls, and let’s not even talk about Viox, now look at the pattern a good majority of these meds have side effects and it's usually depression, anxiety and mood swings, so they send you to the docs for the depression and then more drugs yay!!! But then the side effects from those drugs kick in insomnia, so then you working with a sleep aid, and with all this crap flowing through your system, you might just get to sleep and not wake up. :(

Ross
1st December 2010, 20:38
Eliminate stress, eat healthy, think healthy, get fresh air and exercise. That will be $60, please. I take checks

A little less of the:couch2:

I'l add " get some sunshine on your body" if at all possible...sorry northerners...I know its limited this time of year.

Ross