25 Points - the most important errors in NIST's analyses of 9/11

[winstonsmith]

Here is a more technical summary of the most important errors in NIST's analyses.

It is broken down by building, so you have an easy time keeping details separated. The table of contents are clickable links for fast navigation.

http://www.ae911truth.org/images/articles/2014/11/twenty-five-points-10-19-14-3.pdf

I was part of the team that put this together and have intimate knowledge of the first two points.

Please ask me anything. Your knowledge is our power.

[Bill Ryan]

.
Thank you indeed! :)

(And a very warm welcome to the extremely aware community here.)

[Kano]

You and your technical summary are great additions to this community! I'm looking forward to digging in and starting the dialogue!

[mojo]

The courts won't listen to any other narrative than what TPTB want. The supreme court declined to hear Dr Woods even under whistleblower status. What can citizens to do when the legal system abandons us?

[sirdipswitch]

When is folks gonna accept the fact that all those in control gotta do, is that which they have.. and are doing... is just "ignore", everyone and play the game They wish. The "ONLY" story they will ever accept... is the story they produced!!!

Y'all can investigate this stuff till yer old and grey... ain't nothin gonna change.

[A Voice from the Mountains]

This really is an excellent collection of facts. I used to harp on FEMA appendix C and NIST's "calibration" for the computer models as two Achilles' heels in "official story" reports. Those two alone both totally refute NIST's final hypothesis and also provide direct evidence of things going on besides what the reports focus on.

The pdf you just linked to is obviously a distillation of years of study and debate about this literature. This is a gem, a diamond born out of lots of heat and pressure. Thanks for posting it.

[Satori]

And this http://www.journalof911studies.com/resources/2015LooneyVol40Mar.pdf which I wrote.

[Hod8]

One of the biggest most occupied,heavily computerized office buildings in the world and not a chair,desk,file cabinet,phone,table,furniture NOTHING that was even distinguishable as to what it was,was ever really found...Fire and a natural collapse does not could not produce enough energy to produce results that we saw..Then you factor in the numerous explosions going on,video & eyewitness testimonies,government/corporation motives for going to war,etc..If it walks like a duck,talks like a duck,it's probably......you guessed it..an INSIDE JOB using explosives ..Conspiracy to commit mass murder,terrorism,fraud,you name it...