Do you think the world would be a better place if Rome had conquered the world thousands of years ago?

[AMystic3434]

if Rome took over the world thousands of years ago wouldn't the world be a better place today instead of all divided. Sure they killed Jesus but they would have to be forgiven for that. The world might be in a better place today if Rome would have taken over the world thousands of years ago.

[Bill Ryan]

if Rome took over the world thousands of years ago wouldn't the world be a better place today instead of all divided. Sure they killed Jesus but they would have to be forgiven for that. The world might be in a better place today if Rome would have taken over the world thousands of years ago.

I guess one could call that The Old World Order. :)

[transiten]

if Rome took over the world thousands of years ago wouldn't the world be a better place today instead of all divided. Sure they killed Jesus but they would have to be forgiven for that. The world might be in a better place today if Rome would have taken over the world thousands of years ago.

There is actually a theory that not only individuals reincarnate but also countries as described in "The Synchronicity key" by David Wilcock. And guess which country is the reincarnation of the Roman Empire? The US :cash: And the ambition to gain worldpower seems to have survived :spy:

[AriG]

No. I think Rome's lasting foundations are what is wrong with the world. Prior, we in the West were tribal, without overreaching orchestration, as man's nature requires.

[seehas]

if rome conquered the world we had the world wide fascism dictatorship already running since a long time, and i even believe the hidden technologies would be open out there but controlled since we would face a major enemy from out of space, the cabal are the romans wearing more modern clothes, nothing else changed.

[Cidersomerset]

9foi342LXQE

===================================================
===================================================

On a more serious note the Roman empire did carry on in the East until 1453
until the fall of Constantinople , and the western Holy Roman empire , a sort
of descendent was only devolved by Napoleon in 1806.

The Celtic culture was developing before being incorporated into the empire.
Rome itself drew heavily on Greek and other earlier empires. There were tribal
nomadic groups constantly migrating from the east , Huns , Saxons, Vandals
Goths and many others. Its difficult to know what would have happened if
there was no Rome ? Carthage , Macedonia , Parthia all would have been
regional powers as well as the Celts. Who would of faced the waves of migrating
newcomers over the centuries. There may not have been Christianity the way
it evolved and we may still be pagan with druids instead of priests . Its difficult
to say for sure.

[Morbid]

there is a school of thought out there claiming that roman empire has never `collapsed` - in fact it merely changed form as the progression is a quite staged process. what we witness today in the world is direct result of few turns that were taken before and after the `collapse`. but then, who knows huh?

[Bubu]

What is the motive for conquering the world? The world will be a better place if no one will try to lord it over the others

[ghostrider]

The world would still be war , humans on Earth cannot co-exist with anyone... They almost conquered the world, at one time three quarters of the earth was under Roman rule ... The sad truth is even in the most basic neighborhood, people can't get along ...