PDA

View Full Version : Daniel Sheehan / NWO 2.0 --> TPA. TPP. TTIP. RCEP. FTAAP. AGOA. (free trade alliances)



Eram
10th January 2016, 17:02
Dear friends,

Some or many of you may know Daniel Sheehan by now.
He's a Constitutional and public interest lawyer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Sheehan_%28attorney%29) who worked on cases like the Pentagon papers and the Iran Contra scandal.
He knows the system from within and he made some interesting discoveries throughout his carrier which has enabled him to confirm first hand some of the facts that other researchers have tracked down about the cabal and their structure of power.

For some years now, he is also giving classes at several Universities to try and get students to become actively involved in taking back the power to the people.

In this lecture, he poses a thesis that the plans for the NWO as they were drawn up and made public (accidentally) has forced this cabal to change their plans so that in fact, they no longer pursue this NWO agenda, but shifted to a new plan with the same goal but with different means. The free trade alliances.

I have been watching the ongoing process with the becoming of the TTIP and can say for sure that the cabal is putting a lot of effort in bringing it into existence..

If this is true, then this is of great importance to be made public.
The alternative media is mostly still hunting the old NWO narrative and may be blind to the fact that this is no longer their direct objective.

Daniel Sheehan is also getting ready to publish a book: "Rulers of the Realm", which is due in the spring of 2016

It's a long sit to watch trough his lecture(s), but certainly worth it imo.
I would even go as far as to say: A must see!

I'd be very interested in your thoughts.

pRXPSkFCZiI

Gtn7NAhY6L4

Eram
10th January 2016, 18:52
It seems that Daniel Sheehan does not explain his initial claim that the plans for a NWO are altered into the free trade alliances anywhere in these 2 video's.
When he started of with this claim, I naturally assumed that this is what the lecture would lead up to, but apparently he just goes into pinpointing the key players of the cabal mostly and how they took control of the government during the last 100+ years. :blushing:

Maybe he will save this narrative for the launch of his book in the coming spring.

Has anyone else heard of a shift in the plans for the NWO toward the free trade alliances?
I have never heard such a claim before and it seems kind of important to me.

Eram
10th January 2016, 19:39
Any way: The current plans for the free trade alliances seem diabolic to me and somehow, it would make sense to me that the cabal shifted from their plans for the NWO (all nations brought together under one umbrella government and one world army) toward another aim to keep in control of the world finance en resources through these free trade alliances, which are not at all what their name suggest, but all about an investor rights regime that excludes large parts of the world population.

nETzKaIyFJk

One of the reason that this claim from Daniel Sheehan had me triggered is that indeed, these plans for the NWO seem to somehow not coming into existence as one would expect after watching it's first public announcement in 1991 by George bush.
IT has been 25 years now and we are not anywhere near a real NWO yet.

These free trade alliances (investor rights regime) could indeed be a sort of alternative route for the cabal to remain and consolidate their power.

All the while, most of the people who are interested in resisting these forces of darkness are still looking for signs that they are working on their initial plan for the NWO.

Ioneo
10th January 2016, 22:58
I thought the trade pacts were just a kind of lynch pin to help bring in and consolidate the NWO.

loc333
11th January 2016, 05:53
just watched the first 2 hours i agree a must see ..much watch.If you are a member here you know most of these points but maybe not in detail. Kind of funny these kids in the class must be overwhelmed with all the information.Thank you Eram im diggin this.Thank you Daneil Sheehan as well.

Eram
11th January 2016, 10:17
Yes loc333, he seems like an extraordinary human being who has a vast amount of direct experienced knowledge about the rigged system and the key players who take advantage of it.

It's a shame though that I made the false assumption that surely, he would go into length to explain his case about the altered course for world domination (NWO 2.0). So now this whole thread has become a misfit, since there is nothing much to talk about any more. lol

Still, I find it weird that 25 years after the NWO first being mentioned publicly (Bush 1991), this NWO idea is still far from becoming real. One world government to which all nation states are subject is nowhere near what the current world looks like and I can't imagine that it can come to fruit anywhere in the near future.
The idea of a drawing the world in war, a nuclear holocaust after which this NWO will be installed has always sounded unreal to me and not like what they could have envisioned from the start.

If you take into account that the cold war was coming to an end, it becomes a real possibility that the cabal in the US and Europe thought that they could march toward this NWO (under US/Europe rule) in the foreseeable future. Since this still hasn't happened yet, I find it plausible to start entertaining other theories like the one that Daniel posed in the beginning of the first part of his lecture.

What if they indeed shifted their plans to these trade alliances, which in reality are nothing more than an attempt to ensure a US (cabal) and in lesser degree European (cabal) economical Domination of the world?

I'm sure they haven't given up of their dreams for a one world government, but I think that it is a valid idea that the original script for it has been long gone and changed dramatically.

Flash
11th January 2016, 10:24
Yes loc333, he seems like an extraordinary human being who has a vast amount of direct experienced knowledge about the rigged system and the key players who take advantage of it.

It's a shame though that I made the false assumption that surely, he would go into length to explain his case about the altered course for world domination (NWO 2.0). So now this whole thread has become a misfit, since there is nothing much to talk about any more. lol

Still, I find it weird that 25 years after the NWO first being mentioned publicly (Bush 1991), this NWO idea is still far from becoming real. One world government to which all nation states are subject is nowhere near what the current world looks like and I can't imagine that it can come to fruit anywhere in the near future.
The idea of a drawing the world in war, a nuclear holocaust after which this NWO will be installed has always sounded unreal to me and not like what they could have envisioned from the start.

If you take into account that the cold war was coming to an end, it becomes a real possibility that the cabal in the US and Europe thought that they could march toward this NWO (under US/Europe rule) in the foreseeable future. Since this still hasn't happened yet, I find it plausible to start entertaining other theories like the one that Daniel posed in the beginning of the first part of his lecture.

What if they indeed shifted their plans to these trade alliances, which in reality are nothing more than an attempt to ensure a US (cabal) and in lesser degree European (cabal) economical Domination of the world?

I'm sure they haven't given up of their dreams for a one world government, but I think that it is a valid idea that the original script for it has been long gone and changed dramatically.

To me there is no shifting of plans, they are one and the same. A one world economy and army has to have transcontinental and transnational trade agreements to start with, otherwise, no one world. It is an integral part of the New World Order, as planned. The part of the concept of World Order, the Order part, will follow right after, unless something exceptional happens, like people waking up, before transhumanism takes a larger root. Because that part is part of the agenda too, I am pretty sure. One world, one control, one command, one thought, one soul if they could.

Eram
11th January 2016, 10:39
You make some good points Flash.
TTIP, TPP and TESA could very well be part of the original plans and a necessity to a NWO.

Yet, there's still this unsettled feeling that something has changed.
If you remember these 2 speeches that Bush gave back then,... He uttered the words: "We have a real chance att this new world order."
To me it seems like he is talking almost in the "here and now". like, "the Sovjet Union has collapsed and "now" is the time for us to take a shot at this idea."

txukr5zgHnw

Flash
11th January 2016, 11:20
You make some good points Flash.
TTIP, TPP and TESA could very well be part of the original plans and a necessity to a NWO.

Yet, there's still this unsettled feeling that something has changed.
If you remember these 2 speeches that Bush gave back then,... He uttered the words: "We have a real chance att this new world order."
To me it seems like he is talking almost in the "here and now". like, "the Sovjet Union has collapsed and "now" is the time for us to take a shot at this idea."

txukr5zgHnw

Bush speech is NLP here. Do as if the future is now, so that the future gets to come true. to materialize. On a timeline, you bring the objective in the present and see, hear and act as if it is happening in the now.

A powerful trick.

They know exactly what they are doing, don't make a mistake of thinking they are not knowing. Albeit, they may be late... and maybe not.

We will have to wake up, they won't let go by themselves.

Raven
13th January 2016, 07:29
I strongly agree - watching/listening to these 2 segments of Daniel Sheehan's lectures highly recommended and worth the time and effort -
just watched the first 2 hours i agree a must see ..much watch.If you are a member here you know most of these points but maybe not in detail. Kind of funny these kids in the class must be overwhelmed with all the information.Thank you Eram im diggin this.Thank you Daneil Sheehan as well.