View Full Version : Two USA Navy boats detained by Iran in Persian Gulf
Tangri
12th January 2016, 22:14
The crews of two small Navy craft were detained Tuesday by Iran, but American officials received assurances from Tehran the vessels and crew would be quickly returned.
The boats were moving between Kuwait and Bahrain when the U.S. lost contact with them, Pentagon spokesman Peter Cook said.
“We have been in contact with Iran and have received assurances that the crew and the vessels will be returned promptly,” Cook said.
18TH-CENTURY SHIP JUST ONE OF A FEW RECENT UNEARTHED CRAFTS
U.S. officials said that the incident happened near Farsi Island, situated in the middle of the Persian Gulf.
One of the boats had mechanical trouble causing both ships to run aground, officials said.
The 10 troops were then picked up by Iran.
Secretary of State Kerry himself called Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Javad Zarif regarding the incident.
Kerry “personally engaged with Zarif on this issue to try to get to this outcome,” the official said.
Kerry forged a close relationship with the diplomat through years of negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program.
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/navy-boats-detained-iran-persian-gulf-article-1.2494678
lucidity
12th January 2016, 22:37
so... either the American sailors were spying, or they got lost.
Or, it's a cover story for a secret meeting between the two sets of military.
Tangri
12th January 2016, 22:56
so... either the American sailors were spying, or they got lost.
Or, it's a cover story for a secret meeting between the two sets of military.
What I understood is , Americans salvaged an old ship(!) from bottom of the sea and when they try to tow it , they had an unknown mechanical problem and drifted away to the Iranian cost.
Tangri
12th January 2016, 23:08
so... either the American sailors were spying, or they got lost.
Or, it's a cover story for a secret meeting between the two sets of military.
What I understood is , Americans salvaged an old ship(!) from bottom of the sea and when they try to tow it , they had an unknown mechanical problem and drifted away to the Iranian cost.
I have some pictures but dated December 26th 2015, it does not matches with pentagon's date. I ignored it, to not fall a hoax trap.
Matthew
12th January 2016, 23:24
so... either the American sailors were spying, or they got lost.
Or, it's a cover story for a secret meeting between the two sets of military.
Or both. I'm reluctant to believe in coincidence so I'm drawn to this line of thinking. However it could also be coincidence (the Navy helped tow the antique and sent their worst 'not fit for battle' ship which broke down). I did find this 8 month old report of the U.S. Navy being involved in this sort of thing here (http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/24/us-navy-divers-recover-confederate-warship-georgia-river). (http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/24/us-navy-divers-recover-confederate-warship-georgia-river) However I also don't like to believe in coincidence so I'm going to keep some suspicion and my options open
sigma6
13th January 2016, 02:25
I have to say, I enjoyed reading all the well balanced (and thoughtful comments...) I do like to keep an edge of skepticism myself... for my bit, I think that Iran keeps a sharp eye on it's borders and there were more then a few "messages" passed back and forth on both sides... a tiny embarrassment for "Hollywood USA" and an opportunity for Iran to show graciousness and diplomacy after a post Nuclear 5+1 agreement... it is curious what the US was doing in those parts... (treasure hunting?) and of course the US trying to spin it, that Kerry just saved the world... LoL...
Tangri
14th January 2016, 01:10
I have to say, I enjoyed reading all the well balanced (and thoughtful comments...) I do like to keep an edge of skepticism myself... for my bit, I think that Iran keeps a sharp eye on it's borders and there were more then a few "messages" passed back and forth on both sides... a tiny embarrassment for "Hollywood USA" and an opportunity for Iran to show graciousness and diplomacy after a post Nuclear 5+1 agreement... it is curious what the US was doing in those parts... (treasure hunting?) and of course the US trying to spin it, that Kerry just saved the world... LoL...
I want to pinpoint something. Iran didn't confirm nor deny the 3.ship (salvaged) existence.
ghostrider
14th January 2016, 03:00
Americans taken hostage , held for a peroid of time , then released ... an excuse for war , the monsters have been itching for conflict with Iran ... watch, secret technology found in Iraq and the rest of the puzzle pieces needed to make it work are located in - wait for it - Iran ... send in the seals and create a cover story , we'll give you 150 billion, and green light nuclear whatever, just let us near the coast ... this is fishy , ancient sumer and surrounding areas are treasure troves of technology if you know what you're looking for ...can you say- Stargate
cursichella1
14th January 2016, 07:27
Americans taken hostage , held for a peroid of time , then released ... an excuse for war , the monsters have been itching for conflict with Iran ... watch, secret technology found in Iraq and the rest of the puzzle pieces needed to make it work are located in - wait for it - Iran ... send in the seals and create a cover story , we'll give you 150 billion, and green light nuclear whatever, just let us near the coast ... this is fishy , ancient sumer and surrounding areas are treasure troves of technology if you know what you're looking for ...can you say- Stargate
Right, definitely suspect.
I had been thinking that it was a provocative action to make Obama look bad on the evening of his final SOTU address, I mean, the timing...then there were those rumors of a rift between the WH and Pentagon and Military...
Anyway, conservatives were going bananas at the opportunity to make Obama and the U.S. look weak by spinning the story Right. Iranians "seized our sailors", that kind of thing.
Initial Pentagon reports said the soldiers on the two boats were doing training exercises when one of the boats had mechanical trouble and accidently drifted into waters "claimed" by Iran. So, 1.6 trillion spent on defense yet the GPS, anchor and radios fail after some military moron decided it'd be a good idea to hold training exercises at the edge of Iranian waters at a time when there's so much tension in the air? I don't think so.
According to The Atlantic (http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/01/sailors-iran-persian-gulf/423846/), NBC News reported, "The sailors were on a training mission around noon ET when one of the boats experienced mechanical failure and drifted into Iranian-claimed waters, officials added. Iran's coast guard took them into custody, although the crew has been described as being safe."
Sounds like they wanted our take to be "despite being seized by those Barbarians..." when perhaps "despite the fact that after our incredibly irresponsible Navy held "exercises" ridiculously close to Iranian waters, then losing an engine and forgetting altogether how to drinkable to prevent drifting...they were rescued by the Iranian Coast Guard" was closer to the truth. Or maybe neither...just another anomalous event to keep our eyes on everything but the ball.
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/01/sailors-iran-persian-gulf/423846/
Tangri
14th January 2016, 21:33
Americans taken hostage , held for a peroid of time , then released ... an excuse for war , the monsters have been itching for conflict with Iran ... watch, secret technology found in Iraq and the rest of the puzzle pieces needed to make it work are located in - wait for it - Iran ... send in the seals and create a cover story , we'll give you 150 billion, and green light nuclear whatever, just let us near the coast ... this is fishy , ancient sumer and surrounding areas are treasure troves of technology if you know what you're looking for ...can you say- Stargate
I wouldn't go that far but I smelled same family features.
Bumped again, they erased "the salvaged ship" from the story.
ghostrider
15th January 2016, 16:14
There are no accidents, the military in the middle east has a hidden purpose, the war is a diversion ...
Rocky_Shorz
18th January 2016, 00:21
Sorcha Explains why the quick drop in on Russia to keep WW III from beginning...
none of us heard any of this shared in his report.
Obama “Destroyed” After US Navy Boats Transporting Top ISIS Terror Leader Captured By Iran
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
The Ministry of Defense (MoD) is reporting today that the Obama regimes “master plan” for dealing with the Islamic Republic of Iran has been “completely destroyed” after special naval forces belonging to the Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution (Sepāh) during the past fortnight captured two “highly armed and sophisticated” United States Navy Riverine Command Boats (RCB) under the command of the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) operating from the US Fifth Fleet in Bahrain who were transporting to Kuwait for transfer to Syria of a “top level” Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL/Daesh) terror commander.
[Critical Note: All of the events described in this report occurred on 29 December, NOT 12 January. The Pentagons information release of the capture of these vessels was done without President Obama’s permission and was done so by US military leaders intending to embarrass President Obama on the day of his addressing his nation because he had refused permission for US Navy forces to strike the Iranian forces while they were capturing these boats, but who were, likewise, unaware of Obama’s secret ongoing negotiations with Iran.]
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/odi1.jpg
According to this report, Iranian special forces naval troops utilizing intelligence gathered by the Joint Information Center (JIC) in Baghdad “discovered/unveiled” the Obama regimes “plot/plan” to secret into Syria from Saudi Arabia a “top level” Islamic State commander to replace the once feared Syrian terror leader Zahran Alloush who was killed on 25 December by an Aerospace Forces airstrike.
Once this Islamic State terror leader was in route to Kuwait aboard one of the US Navy’s RCB’s, this report continues, an “overwhelming” force of Iranian Sepāh naval troops captured both this terrorist, the US Navy boats (including the American sailors aboard them) transporting him and nearly ignited an all out war when Iranian forces were forced to fire “warning missiles” against the US Navy’s aircraft carrier USS Harry Truman attempting to intervene.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8JQ-XFcdBY
Rear Admiral Ali Fadavi, the commander of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy overseeing this operation, this report notes, stated about this operation to capture this terror leader that the aircraft carrier USS Truman displayed “unprofessional moves” thus causing him to put Iranian naval forces on high alert and warning: “We prepared our coast-to-sea missiles, missile-launching speedboats and our numerous capabilities, to strike if they made a hostile move”.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/odi2.jpg
Upon the US Navy “backing down”, this report says, the captured Islamic State terror leader and the American sailors accompanying him were brought to Farsi Island whereupon Admiral Fadavi immediately contacted Deputy Foreign Minister for European and American Affairs Majid Takht Ravanchi.
The importance of Admiral Fadavi contacting Minister Ravanchi, this report explains, was due to his, Ravanchi’s, months long ongoing secret negotiations with Obama regime representative Wendy Sherman—who, shockingly, the Obama regime put in charge of these negotiations as her prior experience in international diplomacy was her being a social worker and the former director of State of Maryland's office of child welfare.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/odi5.jpg
President Obama’s secret Iran negotiator Wendy Sherman (social worker)
Once Wendy Sherman was advised by Minister Ravanchi of Sepāh’s capture of this Islamic State terror leader and American sailors, this report continues, the Obama regime immediately “caved/relented” to all of Iran’s demands relating to “prisoner/detainee” swaps thus securing for the Iranians everything they had asked for, including the immediate release of seven Iranian nationals languishing in US jails and an agreement that the US would no longer pursue extradition of 14 Iranians for their alleged involvement in purchasing arms from the US to Iran.
Iran on its side, this report says, agreed to release the four dual nationality Iranian-American prisoners it held—the two most important being Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) spies Nosratollah Khosravi Matt Trevithick—the most important of them being Khosravi whom the Obama regime requested of Iran, and was granted, that his release be treated separately from the other three.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/odi3.jpg
As an added “bonus/incentive” for Iran keeping “confidential/secret” the US Navy’s transporting of this Islamic State terror leader, this report further notes, President Barack Obama, also, lifted the American’s decades-old ban on selling aircraft and repair parts to Iran's aviation on Friday (15 January) a full day ahead of the United Nations lifting of sanctions under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA)—and which Iran put into immediate effect by ordering billions-of-dollars worth of European Union made Airbus aircraft instead of US made ones.
To how the American mainstream propaganda media has covered up this entire sordid affair including changing its date from 29 December to 12 January proving, once again, the Obama regimes direct complicity in directing the Islamic State terrorists in Syrian and Iraq, this report concludes, borders on the “absolute comical” as the many versions of what exactly they keep saying happened has kept changing by the hour/day/week (US Navy boats broke down/US Navy boats had navigational errors) and they have “deliberately decoupled” the capture of these US Navy boats with the firing upon the USS Harry Truman aircraft carrier by Iranian naval forces—but which Admiral Fadavi bluntly stated about: “The incident [Iran firing missiles against the USS Harry Truman] occurred during Iran’s seizure Tuesday[29 December] of two US naval boats" link (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1984.htm)
Sorcha's mobile site is still down...
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/odi4.jpg
Rocky_Shorz
18th January 2016, 00:29
I wonder if it was this religious leader...
Many of you wonder why I write like someone out there is actually reading or care about what I write, then a confirmation comes through like this one...
I do not know one Muslim, that would rather be under Sharia law than of mine... Living by Sharia Law, is far different than living under it. All Muslims know in themselves to follow the laws, they don't need an oppressive government to prey on them. Grande Ayasolla of Iran, this message isn't just to Putin, it was a message to you. If your State is going to join the Nation, you must accept Christian Laws by Mohammad's promise, you will accept the laws accepted by Christians. I eat a huge Baked ham for Christmas and love my Dog, closest thing to God we will ever meet on this world. there has never been a suicide bomber that owns a dog in the history of man... If a Muslim meets a dog that follows, care for it, and it will care for you, believe me, you will be forgiven. I think it is the cruelest thing ever written into Law.
I believe in the promise Mohammad made to Christians...
The Promise of Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him) to The Christians of St. Catherine
In 628 AD, a delegation from St. Catherine’s Monastery came to the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and requested his protection. He responded by granting them the following charter of rights. St. Catherine’s Monastery is located at the foot of Mt. Sinai in modern-day Egypt and is the world’s oldest monastery. It possesses a huge collection of Christian manuscripts, second only to the Vatican, and is a world heritage site. It also boasts the oldest collection of Christian icons. It is a treasure house of Christian history that has remained safe for 1,400 years under Muslim protection.
The Eternal Promise:
“This is a message from Muhammad ibn Abdullah, as a covenant to those who adopt Christianity, near and far, we are with them. Verily I, the servants, the helpers, and my followers defend them, because Christians are my citizens; and by God! I hold out against anything that displeases them. No compulsion is to be on them. Neither are their judges to be removed from their jobs nor their monks from their monasteries. No one is to destroy a house of their religion, to damage it, or to carry anything from it to the Muslims’ houses. Should anyone take any of these, he would spoil God’s covenant and disobey His Prophet. Verily, they are my allies and have my secure charter against all that they hate. No one is to force them to travel or to oblige them to fight. The Muslims are to fight for them. If a female Christian is married to a Muslim, it is not to take place without her approval. She is not to be prevented from visiting her church to pray. Their churches are to be respected. They are neither to be prevented from repairing them nor the sacredness of their covenants. No one of the nation (Muslims) is to disobey the covenant till the Last Day (end of the world).”
The promise is eternal and universal. Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) ordering Muslims to obey it until the Day of Judgment. The charter imposes no conditions on Christians for enjoying its privileges. It is enough that they are Christians. They are not required to alter their beliefs, they do not have to make any payments and they do not have any obligations. This is a charter of rights without any duties.
The document is not a modern human rights treaty but, even though it was penned in 628 AD, it clearly protects the right to property, freedom of religion, freedom of work, and security of the person. Quote from Islamic Supreme Council Website (http://www.islamicsupremecouncil.com/the-promise-of-prophet-muhammad-peace-be-upon-him-to-the-christians-of-st-catherine/)
everything really is much Simpler than it seems...
news might have you thinking the sky is going to burn soon, but they're still blue on my side of the world...
Think about it, the top intelligence in the world with access to any records can figure out a guy shooting the breeze and watching world events in a forum, could be exactly what he has been joshing about. The 32 Illuminati have bowed, they have no control of events surrounding us, they are no longer fighting our move towards change.
our ship is in dangerous waters, but I've held a helm before when seas are worse...
fasten up, we're almost to the rapids...
the only requirement of a Muslin joining my nation is they read and agree to follow this promise...
isis, you have killed many innocent Muslims?
who are you fighting for and why?
before you pull that chord to blow your ass to heaven... they lied, do not Kill means just that...
you might be so desperate, Hell might be an improvement, but don't believe the brochures.
It's WAAaayyy worse...
you'll see, pull the chord...
isis replied...
December 12, 2015
ISIS Issues Fatwa Calling For Mass Killing Of American Dogs And Puppies
A chilling report issued by the Main Intelligence Directorate General Staff of the Armed Forces (GRU) is warning today that the pet dogs and puppies of American owners have now become “targets for death” after the Islamic State’s (ISIS/ISIL/Daesh) top religious scholar, Turki al-Bin‘ali, issued a fatwa authorizing the immediate mass slaughter of these beloved animals by their terrorist supporters currently residing in the United States.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/ikd1.jpg
According to this report, this Islamic legal pronouncement (fatwa) issued by the Islamic State Caliphates main ideological-religious leader, who currently resides under the protection of the US at their Bahrain naval base (NSAB), was in response to queries from many of their younger American “sympathizers/supporters” wanting to wage jihad but fearful of being captured or killed—or not being of sufficient age to “obtain/purchase” weapons.
Turki al-Bin‘ali’s response to these American followers, as outlined in his fatwa published earlier today in the Islamic State’s online magazine Dabiq, this report continues, was that while although the main duty of jihad was to “kill/destroy/main” as many infidels (non-believers/Christians/Jews, etc.) as possible, no matter what the cost, it is entirely acceptable, also, to strike fear into these Westerners by the mass murdering of their dogs and puppies.
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/ikd2.jpg
With the estimated pet dog and puppy population in the United States being between 70-80 million, this report notes, this shocking Islamic State fatwa now provides for these terrorists with a new “target rich” environment in which to strike fear and terror into these peoples as American police forces will be virtually unable to rapidly respond to it as their current focus remains on the protecting of human lives and property—not pet animals.
Islamic State Caliphate scholar Turki al-Bin‘ali in his fatwa further describes the permissible dogs and puppies to slaughtered by his American “sympathizers/supporters”, this report says, by “allowing/advising” them to only kill those dogs and puppies residing in homes, not on farms—and cites as his Islamic religion authority to issue this fatwa the following “scriptures/sayings”:
Whoever keeps a dog, one Qirat of the reward of his good deeds is deducted daily, unless the dog is used for guarding a farm or cattle.
— Bukhari Vol. 3, #515
Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying people).
— Bukhari Vol. 1, #490
Angels (of Mercy) do not enter a house wherein there is a dog or a picture of a living creature (a human being or an animal).
— Bukhari Vol. 4, #448
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/ikd3.jpg
And to how inhumanly brutal these Islamic State terrorists can actually be in regards to the keeping of pet animals by people, this report warns, one need only look at their captured city of Ramadi, Iraq, where they have begun forcing families to not only kill their pets, but to cook and eat them too.
As the Obama regime and its mainstream propaganda media supporters continue to support these Islamic monsters, this report concludes, new reports that are showing that only 17% the American people support this “death cult” religion may soon change—and with the mass slaughter of their dogs and puppies soon to be unleashed upon them, one could rightly guess this number will fall much lower. link (http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1960.htm)
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/ikd4.png
Turki al-Bin‘ali didn't die in Lybia?
he isn't in Raqqa Syria keeping isis strong?
"currently resides under the protection of the US at their Bahrain naval base (NSAB)"
no wonder so many American troops are coming back mentally ill, protecting monsters so they can be used as boogie men to keep the war machine rolling...
sends an angel out to grab Turki al-Bin‘ali hourglass... time to swing attention to Bahrain...
http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/vicepresident/photoessays/middleast02/essay2/images/02-v2905-19-doha-qatar-398h.jpg
Vice President Dick Cheney talks with King Hamad Bin Isa Al-Khalifa of Bahrain at the Qudaybiyah Palace in Manama, Bahrain, March 17, 2002
Ramada was taken away since that threat from Isis, and now they lose the next "Baghdadi"?
Never mess with our dogs
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CWn23FYUEAApFIl.png:large
that's the Pup Putin sent to France, the ultimate sign of friendship...
this is the trained dog, US sent to teach the pup...
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CWZNFM0UYAEtTmN.jpg:large
Rocky_Shorz
18th January 2016, 00:35
so if the new Caliph was captured with the US Navy ships on the 29th, does that explain why Saudi Arabia did this a few days later?
" (CNN)Saudi Arabia said Saturday it had executed 47 people in a single day, including a dissident Shiite cleric, Nimr al-Nimr, who had repeatedly spoken out against the government and the Saudi royal family.
Nimr had been convicted of inciting sectarian strife, sedition and other charges following his 2012 arrest.
Iran, Saudi Arabia's regional rival, summoned the Saudi ambassador in Tehran to condemn the execution, the state-run IRNA news agency reported. The Shiite-majority nation issued a statement deploring the execution and warning that Saudi Arabia would pay a heavy price for its policies.
U.S. issues cautious response to executions
"The execution of a personality such as Sheikh Nimr who had no means other than speech to pursue his political and religious objectives only shows the depth of imprudence and irresponsibility," Press TV cited Foreign Ministry spokesman Hossein Jaberi as saying... link (http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/02/middleeast/saudi-arabia-executes-dozens-terror/)
Rocky_Shorz
18th January 2016, 05:04
BREAKING NEWS: Al-Obeidi 2nd deputy of isis leader Al Baghdadi, was targeted & killed Jan 8th in an Iraqi airstrike https://t.co/4ldqGKiqCC
I wonder if the leader caught by Iran had a map to find the 2nd in Command tucked in his pocket...
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.