Stephen Hawking: Humans at risk of lethal ''own goal ''

[Gaia]

According to the famous astrophysicist Stephen Hawking 74 years, humanity could live his last moments on Earth by a thousand years. He calls men to be very careful before considering an extraterrestrial colonization.

Humanity is facing one of the most dangerous centuries of its existence, given the progress of science and technology, has warned the famous physicist Stephen Hawking, on BBC Radio 4. According to him, global catastrophe will happen in the next thousand years. To avoid this, not a simple solution: the conquest of space. But again, the British 74-year member of the Royal Society of Arts (London) warns it will take more than a century to establish colonies in space where humans could live among the stars. He calls men to be "very cautious during this period": "We will not stop making progress, so we need to recognize the dangers and learn to control them. I am an optimist and I believe we can, "he said.


More :

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-35344664

http://www.parismatch.com/Actu/Sciences/Une-catastrophe-planetaire-est-certaine-d-ici-mille-ans-stephen-hawking-898849

[Carmody]

I feel that withheld longevity technologies are very much part of the problem of humanity wiping itself out.

We spend too much of our time on this rock fearing and fighting, and a good dose of a longer lifespan stands a good chance of helping us settle ourselves down.

Space, aliens, dimensionality (anti-gravity, FTL/dimensional travel), space colonization, or near immortality.

Some of the above items are conflated with one another. Some are separate..but not really. Advances in technology have a tendency to overlap.

All these things are under tight wraps, in black ops government and corporate black ops. We have persons or groups unknown and largely unrecognized (by the public) that are withholding them.

Concurrently, we have large swaths of brutality and viciousness that are using the human global group as both food and pack animal, with a seeming brutality and viciousness that is considered by most to be unconscionable and is the act and motion of animals and parasites.

Basically, trying to break free at the same time we're being beaten to death.

"Good morning!", you say as you come into global situational wakefulness, with the many-armed hydra fist of parasitical brutality simultaneously flying toward your face.

So what to do?

Is it a simple problem? Is it a complex problem?

The suggestion is that it is a complex problem, due to the hiding of contributing factors. Finding factors is also no way of getting to a truth or a navigable path, unless one holds off from proclaiming an answer. Which is a thing that esoteric and basic common sense will teach you.

To never stop at the formation of the first answer as life is evolution and motion, it is not a dead static thing with one finished face. Which religion tries to tell you, that the first answer is the only. Religion, dogma, and factualized science --- the electric animal fence. And so on. There is no answer in anything ...there is only a quiet moment of balancing... in the continuance of stepping on a path.

Back to the question of the moment. The trick is to break it down into the most simple parameters.... and then, don't get distracted.

Functional answers can only exist in the reflection of a properly formed question.

We note that little to no progress has been made in the freeing of humanity from the multi-faceted fist of brutality. In ten thousand years, little to nothing has seemed to change.

Which means that the correct question, with respect to mass mentality and it's individual musings, is way off target in the formation of the question.

Is it the public being informed and what they are informed with, or their capacity for perception and associated consciousness?

Ie, base question and it's formation. We can talk about great seers, great prophets, great movements and so on, but that means nothing if it always ends up being the same. Which it does.

Thus the mistake in the formulation of the question..... is fundamental. Deeper than the answers we've driven toward and into. The roots of the tree exceed the tree on the surface, is one way of looking at it.

To defeat the surface question and answer scenario, we need a more complete look at the roots, in order to formulate the more correct question. too many people at the surface do not currently have a shovel handle that is long enough to reach the bottom of the pit and scrape away more material to expose the newer aspects of the question components.

Understand, though, that if one wishes to be alive.. and life is emergent from differential (it can exist no other way), that all coming or current questions you face, by definition, must be more difficult and complex than the prior.

Circling back to the start, the decimation of the human environment via ignorance or willfulness, is part of the reduction of population and the containment of longevity... as a process that produces intelligence and reach in humans.

I could go on here, but people have, in the form of thousands of written and visual media.

[Flash]

One thing I have learned with psychopaths is that their greed and thirst for power is so infinitely great, endless, that they end up destroying even the ones supplying them wealth and power and nothing is left, like locust, And they are not smart enough in the larger meaning of the word smart, to understand what they are doing.

The average man, who did not have those longevity pills, nor the brain enhancement means the richest have (i wish they had heart enhancement, but instead they play with black magic to put daggers in each heart petal chakra), is trying is best to survive while sensing something is wrong, but had no more energy to change the situation. BUT, he has no more energy to give to these bastards either, being physically and mentally decimated. They are killing their own source of power, like all locust do. I hope we will be more than a small bunch of real human remaining, when all that created hell is over.

From there or here, then, how do we formulate the question? What is the right question?

[Gaia]

I feel that withheld longevity technologies are very much part of the problem of humanity wiping itself out.

We spend too much of our time on this rock fearing and fighting, and a good dose of a longer lifespan stands a good chance of helping us settle ourselves down.

Space, aliens, dimensionality (anti-gravity, FTL/dimensional travel), space colonization, or near immortality.

Some of the above items are conflated with one another. Some are separate..but not really. Advances in technology have a tendency to overlap.

All there things are under tight wraps, in black ops government and corporate black ops. We have persons or groups unknown and largely unrecognized (by the public) that are withholding them.

Concurrently, we have large swaths of brutality and viciousness that are using the human global group as both food and pack animal, with a seeming brutality and viciousness that is considered by most to be unconscionable and is the act and motion of animals and parasites.

Basically, trying to break free at the same time we're being beaten to death.

"Good morning!", you say as you come into global situational wakefulness, with the many-armed hydra fist of parasitical brutality simultaneously flying toward your face.

So what to do?

Is it a simple problem? Is it a complex problem?

The suggestion is that it is a complex problem, due to the hiding of contributing factors. Finding factors is also no way of getting to a truth or a navigable path, unless one holds off from proclaiming an answer Which is a thing that esoteric and basic common sense will teach you.

To never stop at the formation of the first answer as life is evolution and motion, it is not a dead static thing with one finished face. Which religion tries to tell, you that the first answer is the only. Religion, dogma, and factualized science --- the electric animal fence. And so on. There is no answer in anything ...there is only a quiet moment of balancing... in the continuance of stepping on a path.

Back to the question of the moment. The trick is to break it down into the most simple parameters.... and then, don't get distracted.

Functional answers can only exist in the reflection of a properly formed question.

We note that little to no progress has been made in the freeing of humanity from the multi-faceted fist of brutality. In ten thousand years, little to nothing has seemed to change.

Which means that the correct question, with respect to mass mentality and it's individual musings, is way off target in the formation of the question.

Is it the public being informed and what they are informed with, or their capacity for perception and associated consciousness?

Ie, base question and it's formation. We can talk about great seers, great prophets, great movements and so on, but that means nothing if it always ends up being the same. Which it does.

Thus the mistake in the formulation of the question..... is fundamental. Deeper than the answers we've driven toward and into. The roots of the tree exceed the tree on the surface, is one way of looking at it.

To defeat the surface question and answer scenario, we need a more complete look at the roots, in order to formulate the more correct question. too many people at the surface do not currently have a shovel handle that is long enough to reach the bottom of the pit and scrape away more material to expose the newer aspects of the question components.

Understand, though, that if one wishes to be alive.. and life is emergent from differential (it can exist no other way), that all coming or current questions you face, by definition, must be more difficult and complex than the prior.

Circling back to the start, the decimation of the human environment via ignorance or willfulness, is part of the reduction of population and the containment of longevity... as a process that produces intelligence and reach in humans.

I could go on here, but people have, in the form of thousands of written and visual media.

Please do not confuse artificial intelligence with a form of consciousness or free will. Artificial intelligence already exists and is much more efficient than us in certain areas. Such machines are much more gifted than us in the calculations, which today enables algorithmic trading somewhat scary.

Artificial intelligence enables creation of automated robots that take the form of viruses, spies, decoys ... Do not forget that the NSA has used these robots to get detailed information on our privacy via the listening keywords.

We want to scare us the ability to create true artificial consciousness which could hinder our freedom. But to me that's hiding in plain sight, that night the artificial intelligence already at our freedom and it is much more effective without conscience as docile as ever. Ultimately, if artificial intelligence can start to really think more evolved than ours, would it be peaceful ?

As Asimov says in one of his articles, the three laws of robotics will not be written as such, but we will develop naturally. It is an allegory. As with every tool we build we are introducing safety devices. But these safeties can be disabled but this is the man that is in question, not the machine.

When the A.I. ​​will have caught up human intelligence, one can actually ask what is the usefulness of the human?

Work will be useless and even against productive because for many tasks a robot will be more effective!

Raymond Kurzweil and his transhumanism describe an optimistic view of the thing when Bill Joy sees the end of mankind (so much that he has ceased to design software and processors).

Each of the 2 write on the subject, the article founder of the concern that led to the first conferences on biotechnology ethics was published in 2000 in Wired: "why the Future Does not need us"

It seems that Bill Gates, Elon Musk and Stephen Hawking are stored in the Joy Camp.

Google, Apple and many others (France President Laurent Alexandre DNAVision, technocrat and surgeon) are already committed to the cause of Kurzweil. Alexandre Laurent on BFMBusiness: kKwZmwmz_Zc

[Flash]

I am talking here of longevity pill because a friend of mine has been diagnosed with oesaphagus cancer. This is one of the most difficult cancers to cure - of course with traditional medecine. She is now having all the very strong and heavy chemical treatments to decrease the tumor. She is opened for alternatives afterwards, when the urgency is passed (I told her of clinics in Germany, thanks to info from Avalon forum).

My point here is that she has been prescribed a 2,500$ shot of vitamins, biweekly, to make sure she does not die because of the treatments (this is a lot to pay for here, we have medicaire for other stuff). Then I remember Madonna, the singer, whom's lover was telling about her vitamins shots she was self administering. I realised that it was most probably the same shots.

My friend told me that when she took this 2,500$ vitamine shot, her brain became extremely clear, her thinking faster than ever, her body was ready for anything physical, she was in a shape she did not know she could have (despite the chemical infused in her for cancer). This is how those old psychopaths ruining our world are living through old age, probably to jump into their clone once their lifetime is over. They have all kinds of treatments we do not even imagine.

If we all had longevity pass 250 years old, we would all want to take care of our planet and we would probably refuse the psychopaths treatments. We would also have enough lenght of time to foresee for the future and base ourselves on analysis of a sufficient past.

[Carmody]

Vitamin Injections (https://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/a-closer-look-at-vitamin-injections/) (negative view, nothing to see here, go home, no clear mind for you)