Invisible Entities Discovered

[kirolak]

Fascinating discovery viewable via the Santilli Telescope:

http://www.b-tv.com/thunder-energies-discovers-invisible-entities/

[WhiteLove]

Good post, thank you kirolak!

[Mercedes]

Disclosure in a very slowly way. :)

[mojo]

No surprise, but nice to get more confirmation. Both Martyn Stubbs and 1967sander channel have found these entities and posted on them.

[Shannon]

Wow that's some disclosure right there! Or at least a push from santilli for disclosure

Fascinating... thank you kirolak!

[Constance]

That was well worth a watch!

Thank you so much for posting this Kirolak. :bowing:

It will be interesting to see what comes from this.

[bennycog]

http://www.thunder-energies.com/

good find kirolak :) i thought i would post their website here to browse through. they have quite a bit of money by the looks of it. must be a few investors.

[naste.de.lumina]

Thunder Energies Corp (TNRG:OTC) has recently detected invisible entities in our terrestrial environment with the revolutionary Santilli telescope with concave lenses (Trade Mark and patent pending by Thunder Energies). Thunder Energies Corporation has previously presented confirmations of the apparent existence of antimatter galaxies, antimatter asteroids and antimatter cosmic rays detected in preceding tests. In this breaking news, Thunder Energies presents evidence for the existence of Invisible Terrestrial Entities (ITE) if the dark and bright type.
Source: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2016/01/prweb13168382.htm

How about glasses with concave lenses?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-SZ5rNmvPxz4/T44bZJ4QDpI/AAAAAAAAEMM/wHtutJRdepE/s1600/leadtheylive1.jpg

[Tangri]

Thunder Energies Corp (TNRG:OTC) has recently detected invisible entities in our terrestrial environment with the revolutionary Santilli telescope with concave lenses (Trade Mark and patent pending by Thunder Energies). Thunder Energies Corporation has previously presented confirmations of the apparent existence of antimatter galaxies, antimatter asteroids and antimatter cosmic rays detected in preceding tests. In this breaking news, Thunder Energies presents evidence for the existence of Invisible Terrestrial Entities (ITE) if the dark and bright type.
Source: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2016/01/prweb13168382.htm

How about glasses with concave lenses?

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-SZ5rNmvPxz4/T44bZJ4QDpI/AAAAAAAAEMM/wHtutJRdepE/s1600/leadtheylive1.jpg

You can tell whether a person wearing glasses is near sighted or far sighted by looking at the edge of his or her face through his or her glasses. If the edge of the face is shifted inward (toward his or her nose) through the glasses, the lenses are concave, and the person is near sighted. His or her head and eyes will look slightly or significantly smaller through the glasses. The opposite is true for far-sighted/long-sighted (hyperopic) people.
Concave lenses are also called diverging lenses.



Nearsightedness or myopia is the inability of the eye to focus on distant objects. The nearsighted eye has no difficulty viewing nearby objects. But the ability to view distant objects requires that the light be refracted less. Nearsightedness will result if the light from distant objects is refracted more than is necessary. The problem is most common as a youth, and is usually the result of a bulging cornea or an elongated eyeball. If the cornea bulges more than its customary curvature, then it tends to refract light more than usual. This tends to cause the images of distant objects to form at locations in front of the retina. If the eyeball is elongated in the horizontal direction, then the retina is placed at a further distance from the cornea-lens system. Subsequently the images of distant objects form in front of the retina. On the retinal surface, where the light-detecting nerve cells are located, the image is not focused. These nerve cells thus detect a blurry image of distant objects.

The cure for the nearsighted eye is to equip it with a diverging lens. Since the nature of the problem of nearsightedness is that the light is focused in front of the retina, a diverging lens will serve to diverge light before it reaches the eye. This light will then be converged by the cornea and lens to produce an image on the retina.




(Note: In the diagram above that the light approaching the eye from a distant object is traveling as a bundle of rays that are roughly parallel to each other. Suppose for a moment that the distant object is the lettering on the chalk board in the front of the room as you sight at it from the back of the room. Geometrically, whatever light rays from a particular letter or word that reach your eye will be traveling roughly parallel to each other.

[Lifebringer]

Disclosure of the archons our ancestors told us about?

[Flash]

Disclosure of the archons our ancestors told us about?

I would rather think disclosure of energies and beings that do exist but for which we were not aware of, and that may or may not influence us, in good or in bad.

To me it look like astral beings. Which some amongst us, human, have always seen.

[cuitlahuac]

Fascinating discovery viewable via the Santilli Telescope:

http://www.b-tv.com/thunder-energies-discovers-invisible-entities/

If the paper doesn't define "entity", it could be a psy-op or a "promotional" stunt.

Edit 25 January:

Entity is defined as objects made of anti matter.

[MorningFox]

Am I missing the images? Can't find them anywhere. It's basically pointless without seeing the images... No?

[Pam]

Wow!!! this is fascinating. It makes me wonder what the average Joe could to with a concave lens and a digital camera. Has anyone tried anything with this?

The other really interesting thing that was said was that these" entities" appear to be found near military installations and other high security areas.

[Shannon]

Am I missing the images? Can't find them anywhere. It's basically pointless without seeing the images... No?

The images are in the video in the op. They are after the 2:00 minute mark and there are only a few examples of the two types of entities.

Hope that helps. :)

[ExomatrixTV]

7XdN5eJcZ98

~a must see video on this link: http://www.b-tv.com/thunder-energies-discovers-invisible-entities/

http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/ITE-paper-12-15-15.pdf

_gRC2q_VLEM

[Tangri]

There is another thread.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88383-Invisible-Entities-Discovered&p=1039984&viewfull=1#post1039984






Edit from Bill: Yes, threads merged :thumbsup:

[amor]

I would like to know what my cat is looking at over my shoulder and head continually. It is positively scarey. I have often thought that scientists could see full images in the universe as well as here on earth if they used portions of the light spectrum (similar to octaves on the piano), converting each section into corresponding visible spectrum, layering them in 3D and voila there we have images we can understand instead of partial shapeless colors which tell us little.

[Shannon]

I would like to know what my cat is looking at over my shoulder and head continually. It is positively scarey. I have often thought that scientists could see full images in the universe as well as here on earth if they used portions of the light spectrum (similar to octaves on the piano), converting each section into corresponding visible spectrum, layering them in 3D and voila there we have images we can understand instead of partial shapeless colors which tell us little.

Yeah me too! Not just every cat I've ever known has done that, but my dogs do it too. And they do it to other people so I'm not special. (I'm speshul ;p)

Freaks me out sometimes. And once in a while my one dog cries looking up at the wall and goes and looks at the other side too! Like he's playing invisible peekaboo with nothing....creepy.

[Yetti]

My question here is: if the digital cameras can spot this is because the image is into the visible spectrum of light, shouldn't be visible for us too?
Unless the camera is capable of uv or infrared . Also there is another possibility , that the image flashes at a speed out our vision range but the camera can capture due to speed of the image process. !!! ???

[Meggings]

This picture taken from this link: http://yournewswire.com/new-type-of-lense-detects-entities-invisible-to-humans/

http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/lenses-see-entities-650x350.jpg

Ya gotta smile at this image. The skimpy article had these words in it: "“This is an exciting discovery. We do not know what these entities are; they’re completely invisible to our eyes, our binoculars, or traditional Galileo telescopes, but these objects are fully visible in cameras attached to our Santilli telescope,” stated Dr. Ruggero Santilli, CEO Thunder Energies Corp."

[Tangri]

My question here is: if the digital cameras can spot this is because the image is into the visible spectrum of light, shouldn't be visible for us too?
Unless the camera is capable of uv or infrared . Also there is another possibility , that the image flashes at a speed out our vision range but the camera can capture due to speed of the image process. !!! ???

To understand the concept of visibility, there are certain steps of comprehension.

The human eye is a remarkable biological invention, a shining triumph of the process of evolution. Although the human eye was the detector that started us on mankind's exploration of the Cosmos, it has some shortcomings that ultimately limit that exploration:

-The eye has limited size and therefore limited light-gathering power.

-The eye has limited frequency response, since it can only see electromagnetic radiation in the visible wavelengths.

-The eye distinguishes a new image multiple times a second, so it cannot be used to accumulate light over a long period in order to intensify a faint image.
-The eye cannot store an image for future reference like a photgraphic plate can.

(The human eye does not instantly forget what it saw. It takes at least 1/24th of a second to forget what it saw. Television and movies only show us a new picture every 24th of a second. Since our eyes didn't forget the previous image yet, the new image gets blended with the previous. This gives us the illusion of smooth, realistic motion. If an image is really bright, it may leave a trace on your eye for a much longer period of time. Seeing spots after someone takes a flash picture is a good example of this.)

Astronomers have developed a variety of instruments and techniques to supplement the human eye and to alleviate these shortcomings. As a result, in modern research astronomy, very few observations are made any more by an astronomer looking directly through an optical telescope.

In plain English;

We see everything but do not process all of it with our mind. (ignorance is the key element , which related un-,/familiarity , disturbance , coyness, necessity)
We need a VCR or equals (with variable recording and playing speed) and extra memory storage room to recall and digest to call "I saw it".

[Hervé]

BREAKING NEWS: New Telescope Observes Otherwise Invisible Terrestrial Entities with Intelligent Movement (http://www.ancient-origins.net/news-science-space/breaking-news-new-telescope-observes-otherwise-invisible-terrestrial-entities-020715?page=0%2C1)

By April Holloway (https://plus.google.com/111732353779175483777/posts) 26 January, 2016 - 16:50


http://www.ancient-origins.net/sites/default/files/field/image/Tampa-Bay-in-Florida.jpg (http://www.ancient-origins.net/sites/default/files/field/image/Tampa-Bay-in-Florida.jpg)
Tampa Bay in Florida (pictured). Source: Matthew Paulson / Flickr (https://www.flickr.com/photos/matthewpaulson/7601042042)


Invisible Terrestrial Entities of the Second Kind (ITE-2)

He defines the Second Kind (ITE-2) as entities that:


are not visible to the human eye or to conventional optical instruments with convex lenses, but are otherwise fully visible via Santilli telescopes with concave lenses;
exist in our terrestrial environment, rather than in deep astro-physical spaces; and
leave “bright images” in the background of digital cameras attached to Santilli telescopes.

Unlike the ITE-1s, which leave dark images caused by a type of light equivalent to antimatter-light, ITE-2s appear to be composed of matter that leave bright images caused by ordinary light, which possess invisibility due to the “conversation of their index of refraction from a positive to a negative value”.

Dr Santilli notes that the ITE-2s were pulsating and moving systematically backward and forward, suggesting they were “conducting unauthorized surveillance of the Tampa Area solely visible with the Santilli telescope, thus confirming the need for systematic views of sensitive civilian, industrial and military installations”.


http://www.ancient-origins.net/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/Photographs-of-ITE-2s.jpg?itok=VSv8TQqZ

Photographs of ITE-2s. Captured by Dr Santilli in the night sky over Tampa Bay, Florida on September 5, 2015. Credit: Dr Santilli.



http://www.ancient-origins.net/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/ITE-2.jpg?itok=zTLBtL7y

Photograph of an ITE-2. Credit: Dr Santilli. showing its movement. The entity consists of lights of different colors that are pulsating and move synchronously according to a complex trajectory during the 15 seconds of exposure, including a point in which motion stopped for a few seconds, to resume thereafter.


In his report published in the American Journal of Modern Physics, Dr Santilli explains the significance and potential applications of this revolutionary discovery:

“The writing of this paper has been motivated by the fact that ITE-1 and ITE-2 behave in a manner strongly suggesting the conduction of unauthorized surveillance of our sensitive, civilian, industrial and military installations, thus warranting their societal knowledge.

On scientific grounds, the documentation presented in this paper establishes beyond credible doubt the existence of two new types of light that are totally outside any possibility of treatment via 20th century physical knowledge…

On industrial grounds, the findings presented in this paper establish, also beyond credible doubt, the utility of Santilli telescopes, not only for basically novel astrophysical advances, but also for issues pertaining to personal, industrial and national security.” By April Holloway (https://plus.google.com/111732353779175483777/posts)


Reference:
Ruggero Maria Santilli. Apparent Detection via New Telescopes with Concave Lenses of Otherwise Invisible Terrestrial Entities (ITE) (http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/ITE-paper-12-15-15.pdf). American Journal of Modern Physics. Special Issue: Issue II: Foundations of Hadronic Mechanics.


About Dr. Ruggero Santilli
Dr. Ruggero Santilli (http://thunder-energies.com/index.php/ct-menu-item-3) was born and educated in Italy where he achieved his Ph.D., the highest possible education in mathematics and physics, as well as a chair in nuclear physics at the Avogadro Institute in Turin. In 1967, Dr. Santilli was invited by the University of Miami in Florida to conduct research for NASA. In 1968, he joined the faculty of Boston University, under partial support from the U.S. Air Force, where he taught physics and mathematics from prep courses to seminar post-Ph.D. courses. From 1974 to 1977 he was a visiting scientist at MIT and from 1978 to 1983 he was a member of the Department of Mathematics of Harvard University under support by the U. S. Department of Energy to study a generalization of quantum mechanics and chemistry needed for new clean energies and fuels. Since 1984. Dr. Santilli has been the author of some 250 technical articles and 18 post Ph.D. level monographs in mathematics, physics, cosmology, superconductivity, chemistry and biology published the world over. He is the founding editor of three journals in mathematics and physics and editor of several others. Dr. Santilli is the recipient of numerous prestigious prizes and since the 80s, has been recommended by scholars around the world to the nominations for the Nobel Prize in physics as well as in chemistry. From 2007 to 2013, Dr. Santilli has been the Head Scientist of Magnegas Corporation that has developed a new gaseous fuels with complete combustion internationally. Currently, Dr. Santilli is the Chairman of the Board and Head Scientist of the new publicly traded company, Thunder Energies Corporation, which is developing the cleanest possible and most efficient possible combustion of fossil or synthetic fuels.

[Clear Light]

For Information :


There's a 9mb ZIP file containing a number of JPG images as shown in their video (posted above) here : http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/ITE-pictuires.zip

Their docs drive (http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/) also contains a number of other PDFs some of which are dated January 2016 and seem to be related to the so-called "ITE" phenomenon.


¤=[Post Update]=¤

Also their November 2015 PDF TEC-Pres-11-15.pdf (http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/TEC-Pres-11-15.pdf) details so-called "Invisible Sky Entities" (ISE’s) on slides 22, 23 and 24.


32683
32682
32684

[cuitlahuac]

For Information :


There's a 9mb ZIP file containing a number of JPG images as shown in their video (posted above) here : http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/ITE-pictuires.zip

Their docs drive (http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/) also contains a number of other PDFs some of which are dated January 2016 and seem to be related to the so-called "ITE" phenomenon.


¤=[Post Update]=¤

Also their November 2015 PDF TEC-Pres-11-15.pdf (http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/TEC-Pres-11-15.pdf) details so-called "Invisible Sky Entities" (ISE’s) on slides 22, 23 and 24.


32683
32682
32684


This looks like a hoax to me. Those lights are clearly street lights on a hill with a digital camera on long exposure (several seconds) and the red "entity" is most probably a cell tower with 3 red lights at different levels. If you use long exposure and move the camera or telescope, you get that effects. I have done so.

Also, if this were of anti matter of if it was to be anti matter light, it will react with matter here and would annihilate yielding enormous amounts of energy, light. I need to check if there is anti light, or anti-photons. I know there is anti-matter, but don't know of anti-light (anti-photons).

[Clear Light]

Hmmm ... well I'm not commenting on the so-called ITE's or ISE's but it seems like they've been promoting the idea of "antimatter galaxies, antimatter asteroids and antimatter cosmic rays via the use of a new telescope" since November / December 2014, see here Confirmation of Santilli’s detection of antimatter galaxies via a telescope with concave lenses (http://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmp.s.2015040101.17.pdf) published on "SciencePublishingGroup (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/journal/paperinfo?journalid=122&doi=10.11648/j.ajmp.s.2015040101.17)"


Abstract: Following decades of mathematical, theoretical, and experimental research on antimatter, recent results have announced the apparent detection of antimatter galaxies, antimatter asteroids and antimatter cosmic rays via the use of a new telescope with concave lenses known as the Santilli telescope. This article presents results providing additional confirmations that Santilli has indeed achieved the first known detection of antimatter in the large scale structure of the universe, and identifies the main implications

[cuitlahuac]

As far as I know, there are not anti-photons.


Question: Since an anti photon is a photon travelling backwards in time, is the max speed of an anti photon 186,000miles/sec, or is it -186,000?

Answer: Actually, the photon is its own antiparticle. A photon and an antiphoton are exactly the same thing. Further, the concept of time really has no meaning for a photon, since it always travels the speed of light.

Also, a negative velocity has the same meaning as a positive velocity -- it just means the object is moving in the opposite direction.

- Warren

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/anti-photons.23122/


If the particle is not charged then Quantum field theory doesn't impose any other constraint and so you don't need antiparticles for photons (since they are not charged). But you can still consider the same operation of keeping mass and spin and swapping charges and since this does nothing to photon, you can decide to identify it with an antiphoton. Your call.

http://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/13654/do-anti-photons-exist

If the photon and anti-photon are the same thing, then photons and anti-photons behave the same on the telescope lenses.

If Santilly is identifying something, it must be investigated what it is.

[wyldflwr]

I've been photographing tehese entities for the last few years but I have sensed them my whole life. Something they may not have figured out yet is that these entites are better than any chameleon and may be made of up of both light and dark...that is to say that one is not just light and the other just dark, they use both light and shadow to hide in and are outside our visible light spectrum...digital cameras can make them more visible to our human eyes. These entities are not a new phenomenon but have been around for a very long, long time. They have quite a bit of influence over the human mind and imho, are archons, psychic vampires, and spiritual parasites. They can make themselves visible by grabbing matter from the world around us...they can appear as humans but something will appear a bit "off" about them, especially in photographs. They feed off of fear and any negative energy they can help their hosts to feel. I've talked to countless people who have awoken from a nightmare to see a quivering orb of light hovering over their heads at eye level which then disappear into the ceiling or wall. It is my conjecture that the "orb" brought the nightmare to them as the emotion that the person put off was tasty indeed to the invisible parasite.

American Journal of Modern Physics
2015; X(X): XX-XX
Published online MM DD, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajmp)
doi: 10.11648/j.XXXX.2015XXXX.XX
ISSN: 2326-8867 (Print); ISSN: 2326-8891 (Online)

http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/ITE-paper-12-15-15.pdf

[giovonni]

here's a related video commentary report ...

New Telescope Detects Intelligent Alien Entities Living on Earth


Are “invisible terrestrial entities” all around us? Thunder Energies corporation Physicist Dr. Ruggero Santilli says yes, and has photos to back it up.
(Invisible to the Naked Eye):You are about to see proof that ‘invisible Alien entities are here, on Earth.’

Researchers seeking evidence of anti-matter in the universe firmly believe they have come across a previously unknown ‘invisible life form’ on planet Earth.

The group of researchers that discovered the mysterious entities work at Thunder Energies corporation, an optics, nuclear physics and energy company. According to them, these mysterious entities inhabit the Earth’s atmosphere.

The company is run by controversial Harvard-educated nuclear physicist Dr. Ruggero Santilli. Dr. Santilli is regarded by many as an expert in mathematics and physics and has already been nominated for Nobel Prizes in Chemistry and Physics.Read Full Story:
http://www.cosmostv.org/2016/02/videonew-telescope-detects-intelligent.html
Source link:http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/ITE-paper-12-15-15.pdf

Published on Feb 1, 2016


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q-Vc6af1FDA

[yelik]

SOFT DISCLOSURE
We can normally only see a tiny proportion of the electro-magnetic light spectrum, white light range. If we could see all frequencies I'm not sure our mind could cope with all the information. I suspect this technology is very old, but they've only just been allowed to release it without being taken out.

It appears this 'new' type of lens is concaved either side allowing light to be fully focused and captured for analysis. Traditional lenses were not able to capture this light as it was dispersed within the telescope.

This new lens appears to capture intelligent entities living amongst us which we're normally unable to see. The film They Live was produced in 1988, nearly 30 years ago so they would have known about it well before that.

[wyldflwr]

They do appear like that at night...most would assume that the photographer moved and the film is blurry. They would be mistaken.

[take]

One word. Pseudoscience.

[DNA]

I'm a little unclear on a few points. Firstly, why are these classified as "entities" which would indicate they are a life form of some type? I mean couldn't there be natural phenomenon which could account for these lights?


I mean we don't call lightning a "entity" so I'm confused as to what criteria were used to determine this phenomenon is alive.

[cuitlahuac]

This is a joke. First the biggest outpoint or illogic here is that there is no anti matter light. Second, there are no scientific definitions in the paper. Third, the language in the paper is a clear joke, hard to spot for those not knowing real science.

This must be some kind of a social experiment ongoing or the scientific community is in apathy.

[Wide-Eyed]

For Information :


There's a 9mb ZIP file containing a number of JPG images as shown in their video (posted above) here : http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/ITE-pictuires.zip

Their docs drive (http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/) also contains a number of other PDFs some of which are dated January 2016 and seem to be related to the so-called "ITE" phenomenon.


¤=[Post Update]=¤

Also their November 2015 PDF TEC-Pres-11-15.pdf (http://www.thunder-energies.com/docs/TEC-Pres-11-15.pdf) details so-called "Invisible Sky Entities" (ISE’s) on slides 22, 23 and 24.


32683
32682
32684


This looks like a hoax to me. Those lights are clearly street lights on a hill with a digital camera on long exposure (several seconds) and the red "entity" is most probably a cell tower with 3 red lights at different levels. If you use long exposure and move the camera or telescope, you get that effects. I have done so.

Also, if this were of anti matter of if it was to be anti matter light, it will react with matter here and would annihilate yielding enormous amounts of energy, light. I need to check if there is anti light, or anti-photons. I know there is anti-matter, but don't know of anti-light (anti-photons).

I agree with your thoughts on this Cuitlahuac- it was after reading your comments and Dr.J Farrell's blog GizaDeathStar.com about the same supposed technology. Summary of skepticism from Farrell - YOU TELL ME: SCIENTIST CLAIMS TO HAVE FOUND SPECIAL LENSES THAT ALLOW ...
Posted on January 29, 2016 by Joseph P. Farrell • 22 Comments
4.17/5 (6)
Now, this one I'm so extremely skeptical of, that you may be wondering why I'm blogging about it at all. Patience, we'll get there in a few moments. But, like yesterday's blog, this requires a bit of context and background, since so many of you sent along this article, and a few of you even referenced the film that forms my "contextual background commentary." This film is the 1988 John Carpenter film, They Live, which has become something of an underground cult classic, and, like many of Carpenter's films, the bizarre plot is explored rather creatively. In the film, the hero discovered a pair of sunglasses that allowed him not only to see that several humans were in effect some sort of other life form altogether, resembling, well, to be blunt, resembling zombies, but that also allowed him to see subliminal messages planted in billboard advertisements, magazine articles, and so on, messages with curt aphorisms such as "marry, have children, consume" and "Obey" and so on.

With that unlikely Hollyweird context in mind, ponder this story that many of you shared, and which, again, I am extremely skeptical of:

New Type Of Lenses Detects ‘Entities’ Invisible To Humans

American Journal of Modern Physics 2015; X(X): XX - XX Published online MM DD, 2015 (http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajmp) doi: 10.11648/j.XXXX.2015XXXX.XX ISSN: 2326 - 8867 (Print); ISSN: 2326 - 8891 (Online) Apparent Detection via New Telescopes with Concave Lenses of Otherwise Invisible Terrestrial Entities (ITE)

Now, to be blunt, I'm not only extremely skeptical of this, but am inclined quite frankly to view it all as a kind of elaborate hoax, not the least of which is because of its strong resemblance to the Carpenter film, and its David Icke-like premise.

But with that in mind, why would anyone want to perpetrate such a thing? Indeed, as the linked pdf paper spells out in its abstract, it is by means of this new technology that one can now see - so it is claimed - invisible entities that leave dark blotches on photographs. So there we have it: dark matter, dark energy, and now, invisible or dark "entities." Moreover, the abstract claims that these entities are surveilling military installations, implying their intelligence and perhaps not entirely friendly nature.

In other words, the bottom line here is that a technology is being claimed that allows one to see "extraterrestrials." It's this that I have so much difficulty with, for it resembles the sort of claims that early contactees made in the 1950s. Whole movements sprung up, with various "technologies" being claimed that allowed one to precipitate "contact." It is the re-birthing of a meme that I find questionable. Don't get me wrong: I'm not philosophically opposed to the idea that there could be "alternative intelligent life forms", even of a kind very different than what we think of as embodied or corporeal life. After all, many human religious traditions from time immemorial speak of such things. Even plasma physicist David Bohm suspected that plasmas have many of the characteristics of life.

It's not the claim about life forms that bothers me, it's the claim about the technology, for let us go further in our high octane speculations, and assume that such a technology does indeed exist. What are the implications?

It's those implications that disturb me, for as one emailer of this story put it, what this reduces us to is that some in the technocratic elite claim to have a technology, by which they can see "entities." The stage is thus set for any variation on the story: "We have seen entities, and they only have our best interests at heart; we're in contact; trust us, they're friendly," or, conversely, "We have seen 'entities' with our wondrous technology, and they are not our friends and we have to prepare; trust us." Trust us. THis is not a hoax. This is not even a disinfo operation.

Well, color me extremely skeptical on all counts, from the claim of the technology, to the claim on what it supposedly sees, and most especially and importantly, to the strange timing of its release as we're increasingly seeing stories about space, space commercialization, and talk of space weaponization, and new treaties to deal with it. It's a convenient meme to have dropped into the mix at a - in my opinion - all-too-convenient time, without much if anything at all by way of corroboration.

My suspicion meters are in the red zone. Hoax? Very possibly and in my opinion highly probable. Disinformation? Psyop? Again, very possibly. Too convenient a resemblance to Carpenter's film? Definitely a yes. But even hoaxes, disinformation, psyops and so on, have to have a kernel of truth somewhere in the mix, otherwise, they have no effectiveness. The trouble here is, where is that kernel? Why bother? It's the potential psyop that disturbs here, more than anything else.

And, just http://gizadeathstar.com/2016/01/you-tell-me-scientist-claims-to-have-found-special-lenses-that-allow-you-to-see-invisible-entities/

[mojo]

I'm slightly optimistic, as it's an intriguing thought to image with concave lens. It seems that having an unbiased researcher test the Santilli scope might help. It might be some artifact to the entities that the scope is picking up. Martyn Stubbs analyzed NASA footage and it shows entities without the Santilli scope, so did analysis by 1967sander channel. November 28, 2014 I personally observed one of these biological
type entities which zoomed in close and hovered about 100 feet above and then zoomed off like a hummingbird, except it was a roiling mass of golden orange colors in an oblong shape. So it's neat that these entities can be filmed and observed without a special scope but still exciting that the Santilli scope might be picking something unusual up.

[DNA]

I'm a little unclear on a few points. Firstly, why are these classified as "entities" which would indicate they are a life form of some type? I mean couldn't there be natural phenomenon which could account for these lights?


I mean we don't call lightning a "entity" so I'm confused as to what criteria were used to determine this phenomenon is alive.



Okay, I'm still hoping to get someone's attention on the above question. So here is another route.


I've got no problem in entertaining the notion that entities may exist we are unaware of that fly through the air with unknown means of levitation and propulsion, but I'm just trying to extrapolate how that criteria came to be in this instance.




For example
The NASA skyfish


These things seem to live in upper orbit around the earth in free space, and apparently they come to the ground.
Their movement seems to indicate they are alive and are at least guided by some intelligence.


Most folks remember the NASA Tether Incident.

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ox6BtwDmm3c/hqdefault.jpg





Here is a photo of one of these Sky Critters next to a Wilhiem Riech organite machine.

http://www.tarrdaniel.com/documents/Ufology/images/skycritters/amoeba1.jpg




And while I'm mentioning Wilhiem Riech there is this.




Willheim Reich suspected invisible creatures lived in the sky. In 1953 Reich enlisted the help of a photographer named Norman Leisting. Reich had Leisting's assistant raise an orgone charged rod into the air in hopes of attracting one of the invisible beings he believed existed. Within 5 seconds, a huge jelly fish like being attached itself to the rod. Becoming visible long enough for Leisting to capture it in a photograph. The screams and panic from Leisting's now running assistant are said to have caused the jelly fish to dissapear. Supposedly 12 additional people witnessed the spectacle. Reich & Leisting were so unnerved by the experiment they were said to have refused to discuss it. Leisting referred to Reich as "The devil himself" later in life.



https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/f8/47/b0/f847b056e5a53ee7e6c9d0ea3b5937bd.jpg

[Shannon]

Whoa. Wait is that pic real?

Btw, I like the questions you're asking.

[amor]

This information really deserves its own heading: While listening to a radio program a story was told about a woman who had floaters in her eyes. Her doctor placed drops in one eye which produced burning for some time. To the woman's consternation, at home she discovered strange beings walking through her home. These had all sorts of mixed appearances. One noticed that she looked back at it and could see it. The next thing she reported was that a very good-looking male entity sat next to her and did something to cure her eye and she no longer could see what is around her all the time unknown to her.

The female doctor on the radio said that many people undergoing this procedure have the same experience, but this has led them into the arms of psychiatrists. Apparently, the eye doctors know all about it but do not speak of it, perhaps because the government would come down on them??? Can you imagine that we are existing among all sorts of human and alien-like people who walk through our homes like Grand Central and we are blind to them! My CAT SEES THEM and thoroughly creeps me out when she stares and follows things invisible to me around the room.

[Wide-Eyed]

This information really deserves its own heading: While listening to a radio program a story was told about a woman who had floaters in her eyes. Her doctor placed drops in one eye which produced burning for some time. To the woman's consternation, at home she discovered strange beings walking through her home. These had all sorts of mixed appearances. One noticed that she looked back at it and could see it. The next thing she reported was that a very good-looking male entity sat next to her and did something to cure her eye and she no longer could see what is around her all the time unknown to her.

The female doctor on the radio said that many people undergoing this procedure have the same experience, but this has led them into the arms of psychiatrists. Apparently, the eye doctors know all about it but do not speak of it, perhaps because the government would come down on them??? Can you imagine that we are existing among all sorts of human and alien-like people who walk through our homes like Grand Central and we are blind to them! My CAT SEES THEM and thoroughly creeps me out when she stares and follows things invisible to me around the room.

Hmmm that is curious any link to that radio show or something we can see ...? :ufo::ufo::ufo:

[DNA]

Hi Amore


That is some seriously interesting stuff. I would love to hear more and hear exactly what type of entities are being seen.


Part of me wonders what the density of the beings seen were.


I've meditated in pristine nature environments and while doing so I began to notice unseen life. I could feel the presence before seeing it, but as I mediated on what I was feeling I began to see things that wanted to be seen by me. And these would be diminutive elf like creatures about two-three feet tall. I've had this experience twice and each time it was just one being, but these beings were not our density. I couldn't have touched it, my hand would have passed right through it.


My point here is this. It may very well be that we are sharing this world on differing frequencies with all kinds of folks.

[cuitlahuac]

They do appear like that at night...most would assume that the photographer moved and the film is blurry. They would be mistaken.

I have produced similar images with my digital camera at night with lights from TV anthena on a mountain, when moving the camera.

I know invisible entities (beings in this case) exist, but Santilli is doing a psy-op here.

[amor]

On the subject of entities which are around us but which we are unable to see, a recent radio show revealed quite a shocker. This lady in her 90's had floaters in her field of vision. Her eye doctor placed a liquid in one eye which she was told would result in pain for some time but that the floaters would disappear in a few days. To this lady's horror, she found that she could see human and alien entities walking through her house, inspecting the contents, looking at her, etc. With the eye which did not receive the treatment, she could see nothing. One of these entities realized that she could see it by the way she looked back at it. Shortly after that, an attractive looking human sat by her side and did something to her and she was no longer able to see the former entities in her home.

The female doctor on the program was questioned about whether other patients had this experience. She said yes; however the doctors do not speak about it. I believe that if they did the Government would come down on them. So, folks, we are all on display to a world of Aliens.

[amor]

Hello DNA: I have posted the story about the lady with the drops in one eye who saw entities in her house twice. Both times, I have been unable to find the post I had just submitted. If I were not so afraid of becoming permanently blind, I would have these drops placed in one of my eyes. Heavens knows, I have seen enough floaters in my eyes to warrant the treatment. Obviously, these beings are on a shifted wavelength from our own, a possibility I have been aware of since I was fourteen. I believe I must have received a download of information around that time.

The information downloaded was about satellite interface with agriculture and all sorts of other systems to run earth smoothly. I spoke about driverless cars and programs which let the cars take you to any address. These are only a few of them. Some others I prefer not to mention lest they come to pass. The magneto-motor over unity motor for free energy was one, and the idea that many frequencies interlace and each world is on a separate set of frequencies.

[DNA]

On the subject of entities which are around us but which we are unable to see, a recent radio show revealed quite a shocker. This lady in her 90's had floaters in her field of vision. Her eye doctor placed a liquid in one eye which she was told would result in pain for some time but that the floaters would disappear in a few days. To this lady's horror, she found that she could see human and alien entities walking through her house, inspecting the contents, looking at her, etc. With the eye which did not receive the treatment, she could see nothing. One of these entities realized that she could see it by the way she looked back at it. Shortly after that, an attractive looking human sat by her side and did something to her and she was no longer able to see the former entities in her home.

The female doctor on the program was questioned about whether other patients had this experience. She said yes; however the doctors do not speak about it. I believe that if they did the Government would come down on them. So, folks, we are all on display to a world of Aliens.

I have a weird correlation here.

Not that it matters, but in my late twenties I had developed the ability to see ghosts. There is a thread here where it is discussed, "How to see a ghost for yourself". (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?21695-How-To-See-A-Ghost-For-Your-Self)
A correlation I've made in that time is this.
Ghosts are parasitic in nature, as such they enter into your energy field. This has the side effect of causing the eye floaties to move about. I've often noted this particular side effect and noted almost without fail, that when the eye floaties begin to rise, fall and swirl in my vision then there is a ghost somehow integrated into my energy field.

This has led me to speculate that perhaps the ghost changes the charge in our energy field and this carries over to the fluid in our ball called vitrius humor which contain flakes of skin that when moving in the fluid create what we know of as eye floaties. A ghost lacks solidity and can not there for interact with our solid dimension, but maybe they are not quite as insubstantial as we would think. Maybe the have just enough solidarity to move the vitrius humor in our eye and or the floaties in it.

Either way, the correlation from what you speak of and my own personal experiences,,,I find absolutely intriguing.

[Mike]

:bump::bump::bump:

[avid]

Thanks for bumping this Mike.

My mother had severe eyesight problems, and went through a number of procedures. She was always sitting looking out onto a grassed area to other houses on our small estate, to wave at passers-by. After a treatment to her particularly bad eye, she watched the green outside and could distinctly see a cloaked lady walking over the green (an old field). This happened a number of times, but the cloaked lady was in the process of carrying some farm produce from behind our house, which is a 16thc settlement. She mentioned these visual abberations to the eye surgeon, who smiled and said “these visual things happen sometimes” and she knew she was telling the truth. She was seeing things we normally can’t see, like animals who act oddly at times. My dear father couldn’t see what she saw, but her description of the lady, her green coloured cloak, was so particular, as she saw her regularly crossing the ‘green’. I know she was not imagining this. Her eye specialist changed her medication and she was sad to not be able to see as ‘before’.

[Mike]

great story Avid!

it reminds me of when i was a boy, opening up packs of baseball cards and getting the occasional hologram card. tilt it ever so slightly to the right or left, and the whole image changed dramatically.

people like your mother, it seems, achieve that metaphorical tilt thru some mechanism or other...and it puts them in tune with some other frequency i think. cool stuff!:flower: