View Full Version : Illegal to collect samples of pollution...
Curiosity
23rd January 2016, 01:44
"The state of Wyoming recently passed Senate Bill 12, the Data Trespass Bill, which will prevent people from collecting evidence of pollution, even on public lands. The bill prohibits the “collecting of information” on property that the person does not own, even public and federal land.
According to the text of the bill, it is now illegal to “take a sample of material, acquire, gather, photograph or otherwise preserve information in any form from open land which is submitted or intended to be submitted to any agency of the state or federal government.”
Read More: http://www.trueactivist.com/us-state-makes-it-illegal-to-collect-evidence-of-pollution-on-public-property
Bob
23rd January 2016, 02:09
mindblowing and probably contrary to the US Constitution..
from : http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/05/wyoming_law_against_data_collection_protecting_ranchers_by_ignoring_the.html
Imagine visiting Yellowstone this summer.
You wake up before dawn to take a picture of the sunrise over the mists emanating from Yellowstone hot springs.
A thunderhead towers above the rising sun, and the picture turns out beautifully.
You submit the photo to a contest sponsored by the National Weather Service.
Under a statute signed into law by the Wyoming governor this spring, you have just committed a crime and could face up to one year in prison.
The Wyoming law transforms a good Samaritan who volunteers her time to monitor our shared environment into a criminal. Idaho and Utah, as well as other states, have also enacted laws designed to conceal information that could damage their agricultural industries—laws currently being challenged in federal court. But Wyoming is the first state to enact a law so expansive that it criminalizes taking a picture on public land.
The new law is of breathtaking scope. It makes it a crime to “collect resource data” from any “open land,” meaning any land outside of a city or town, whether it’s federal, state, or privately owned. The statute defines the word collect as any method to “preserve information in any form,” including taking a “photograph” so long as the person gathering that information intends to submit it to a federal or state agency.
Orph
23rd January 2016, 02:15
Seems like a convenient law for politicians to pass. This way politicians can continue to lay down all that rubbish bullsh** that they're so good at spreading around and nobody has the right to gather any of the evidence so it can be used against them.
Calz
23rd January 2016, 02:20
Corporations call the shots now ... the new normal.
TPP ... Agenda 21 (2030 or whatever it is now) ... UN just here to enforce the police state.
Welcome to the jungle.
Curiosity
23rd January 2016, 02:23
Exactly. Corporations can pollute, dump poisons and now the common citizen can go to jail for trying to expose their criminal acts including Geoengineering. They've gone to far. This is outrageous.
Carmody
23rd January 2016, 03:38
corporations can't do any of these things if you bring the lighting down on them. it's a matter of will, action, and perspective.
Evil will and does back down ---- it simply requires backbone in groups, not individuals, in order to engender that sort of response in them.
They count on you not having a group.. and they infiltrate groups that attempt to come into being.
They've weaponized themselves in multiple ways.... you have to update yourself similarly.
Lifebringer
23rd January 2016, 14:29
Unless they are blatantly saying, OUR government no longer belongs to the people" then we as parents of the young who'll inherit this earth have a lot to say about our government/errant sg poisoning their future drinking water and land while offering
shoddy shady reports of insider investigational propaganda as proof it's for our own good.
NOT surprised, Cheney is running Wyoming.
Boy they're in for a very rude awakening.
Pam
23rd January 2016, 14:40
mindblowing and probably contrary to the US Constitution..
from : http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2015/05/wyoming_law_against_data_collection_protecting_ranchers_by_ignoring_the.html
Imagine visiting Yellowstone this summer.
You wake up before dawn to take a picture of the sunrise over the mists emanating from Yellowstone hot springs.
A thunderhead towers above the rising sun, and the picture turns out beautifully.
You submit the photo to a contest sponsored by the National Weather Service.
Under a statute signed into law by the Wyoming governor this spring, you have just committed a crime and could face up to one year in prison.
The Wyoming law transforms a good Samaritan who volunteers her time to monitor our shared environment into a criminal. Idaho and Utah, as well as other states, have also enacted laws designed to conceal information that could damage their agricultural industries—laws currently being challenged in federal court. But Wyoming is the first state to enact a law so expansive that it criminalizes taking a picture on public land.
The new law is of breathtaking scope. It makes it a crime to “collect resource data” from any “open land,” meaning any land outside of a city or town, whether it’s federal, state, or privately owned. The statute defines the word collect as any method to “preserve information in any form,” including taking a “photograph” so long as the person gathering that information intends to submit it to a federal or state agency.
This is one of those really creepy laws that most will not pay much attention to. And at the same time, it is such a large step towards the dystopian future we are marching towards. I wonder who sponsored this legislation, Monsanto?
Calz
23rd January 2016, 15:06
Using the word "corporation" is really silly and perhaps we should stop.
The elite control the corporations completely ... outright or through various mechanisms.
The elite call the shots at every level ... bought and paid for ... all around most the world (Iceland ... perhaps a few other places).
Corporations are a nebulous way of shifting the responsibility.
Right?
Sunny-side-up
23rd January 2016, 16:47
Using the word "corporation" is really silly and perhaps we should stop.
The elite control the corporations completely ... outright or through various mechanisms.
The elite call the shots at every level ... bought and paid for ... all around most the world (Iceland ... perhaps a few other places).
Corporations are a nebulous way of shifting the responsibility.
Right?
YUP!
Using the word "corporation" is really another word/usage of "Compartmentalization"
You never get to see or hear the real head, face to face.
just as we all know that "All roads led to Rome" (Elite's)
"All crap and abuse leads to the Elite now"!
Elite, what a miss use of a fine word! I don't like that name for them, they are not elite as far as our understanding and our levels of being, they are "Retrograde abusers of life" RAOL.
WhiteLove
23rd January 2016, 18:42
This is a perfect example of how the jurisdiction system is being used as a tool for corruption and crime. At some point the governments of the world that make these kinds of things happening, will have to fall... I think we are very close now to a point when the people will go: Enough.
Curiosity
23rd January 2016, 20:03
The elite don't just control the corporations, they own the corporations, they are the corporations. And the corporations are people. They control and own the government. And the government passes legislation and laws like this to protect the elite corporations.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.