sigma6
29th January 2016, 07:11
excerpts from an email correspondence... (this will be hard to fully conceptualize if you haven't kept up on my (by now dozens and dozens (and dozens!) of posts on "The Concept of Legal Person" and connecting threads...(see Post #9) http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?76397-The-Concept-of-Legal-Person&p=895792&viewfull=1#post895792
David Bowie hangs up his laurels... transitions to another life (in his private capacity)
The truth is stranger then fiction (when looked at especially while living in a world of fiction I would imagine...
Elvis’ death was full of controversy, as were the circumstances of his life just before he died, it's an incredible story in it's own right, but now in context, it makes a lot more sense... especially since it looks like he was under some kind of protection (fiduciary trustee relationship) with the government, etc... right up to his "Death" even surrounding how the NAME on his tombstone was incorrectly spelt?
(Why is that relevant? Besides the impossibility of it being a legitimate "mistake" and even if it was... that it was NEVER "properly" corrected, etc?... Consider that the NAMES of Ships, Corporations, and PERSONS (which are the source of the NAMES on Tombstones, which are actually LEGAL NOTICE of transference of Title back to the State) are spelt in upper case... Since they are all LEGALLY considered to be Legal Vessels, DEAD CORPORATE LEGAL ENTITIES... And Admiralty Law is the only place where you will find proof of the origin of this grammatical form... (now go look at the grammatical style of all your credit cards, driver's license, bank accounts, etc... all of which can ultimately be linked back to your BIRTH CERTIFICATE (Certificate of BERTH) the very first legal property that you REGISTERED (which means you split title and created a legal title and an equitable title, left the legal title with the registrar (and all that that implies) and you received a certificate (imperfect equitable title) that can be expressed via a proper trust interpretation into a perfected equitable title thus establishing a powerful and automatic trust... A trust interpretation so powerful that it supersedes ALL OTHER LAW FORMS... Because it is, was, and will always remain the first and most fundamental and foundational law form, going back literally to Biblical times and ancient Rome.
then Michael Jackson...
and now David Bowie...
(and David Bowie definitely knew about the NAME...) There was an article many years ago... according to a music enthusiast friend of mine, (who knows nothing about CR..)...and he mentioned to me that he read this article about David Bowie going through a process where he was removing his signature from all previous documents he was involved with... and that he then became incredibly wealthy after that...
He was also known to have created Bonds against his music... and essentially borrowed millions... so he has toyed and looked into the financial aspect of credit, how money is created, Bonds and Securities... financial concepts that have been used to describe the various mechanisms behind the Birth Certificate ever since 1933 and the removal of all money of substance (gold) from the public to be held by the government (in trust by definition) And he definitely did "something" along some kind of legal interpretation many years ago... having to do with his signature!...(at least according to this friend, and I do see this as an independent confirmation, because I know he knew nothing about my CR research... ) (it looks like if you make enough money and you are inquisitive enough... you can probably sit down and talk to someone ("in private" no doubt) and take CONTROL of your own REGISTERED NAME.... And you would certainly want to if you have any appreciation at all for what happens from a "legal title" point of view when you "REGISTER" anything into a "Public Registrar" (although it has a private side too by definition)
Check out this one on Michael Jackson... (It’s oh so obvious...) and he has chosen to rename himself with TWO FIRST NAMES!... and is quoted in the video as saying he wanted to "create HIS OWN PERSON..." Do you think he knew about the NAME... ??? There is no way any of this could be a coincidence if you understand the implications of what he is saying and doing...
DAVE DAVE !!! The VOICE...
I1bLuFcMKWA
Not a hoax but a transition from the public into a private trust interpretation in relation to the REGISTERED NAME...
Notice also how David Bowie has carefully selected two FIRST NAMES as well...
(how many people use "Steven" without the s as a last name?)
Listen to this David Bowie interview where he is now "Jack" "Steven"
100% Proof David Bowie Is Alive - His Death Was A "Hoax" - Appears On Sky News As "Jack" "Steven"
vp3Z_PrYvQk
And you can hear his cryptic responses... he is essentially revealing to us that he coming back into public as a different NAME!... (I would love to see the paperwork on how he has set this up!)
David Bowie Death "Hoax" - Alive And Well As "Jack Steven" (Two FIRST NAMES) On Sky News
0r2Dn_dSS40
The two people interviewing him... either know or at least should be suspicious, even if only on a subconscious level... and isn’t it odd, no one even mentions how much at the very least, that his looks would at least "remind" them of David Bowie... ?? Not one mention!?... you would think that would be the first thing that would come to ANYONE’s mind! But that was probably agreed to, BEFORE the interview ... not to discuss it... ???
The REGISTERED UPPER CASE NAME, in Admiralty Law is a LEGAL VESSEL, A Corporate Entity, is considered by the court system as a LEGALLY DEAD ENTITY (it needs to be operated, or MOVED by a living soul)
Think about it... he was totally hinting about it in his last album... almost playing on the Christ imagery (in reverse, mirror image fashion) The result being one last huge blast, of publicity and album sales for years to come... He’s set for life... and now all he wants is his "freedom" back... how to get that?... He needs a new "identity" which goes back to being a legal/private/trust issue...
With enough money he would be able to find someone who would talk to him...
And the teeth can’t be faked, there is no comparison between those teeth. The other guy whoever he is... Was just a faked, one off interview, to add a thread of plausibility... He probably signed a non-disclosure, or the interview piece was bought outright and copyrighted, etc... he could have been paid a "King’s ransom to do a 5 minute spot (on nothing in particular) just to put one tiny thread out there... That one video... that is all you will ever find in the past on YouTube of the previous "general public" "Jack Steven" on YouTube... LOL!!
Those are real teeth on real gums (on Bowie) He had very distinctive large, unmistakable teeth... and no way the other supposed "Jack Steven" fixed a gap on his, and his teeth and ended up looking like David Bowie's teeth????? (he doesn't even look like him facially really... the Sky News "Jack" "Steven" looks so much more like David Bowie!!! (because he IS... (or was) BOWIE, DAVID (the legal Estate)
There is nothing shadowy about it at all, it does make perfect sense from a private trust point of view... He’s made enough money... he may have either closed off his past Estate or set it up as a trust and now he wants to operate in the public... as "Jack" "Steven" (the giveaway is "Steven" without an s, is hardly ever used as a last name...?) so he must be getting the same legal advice that Michael Jackson got... for some reason they both chose... FIRST NAME, FIRST NAME (or perhaps Middle, but NO LAST NAME or Sir (Sur) NAME, which is often associated with Surety, some interpretations believing Sir is derived from Surety, just like Jordan Maxwell, Winston and many others show the play on words to hide these connections in public like Birth and Berth, etc...
As further confirmation, this is a direct reference to a story which supports this interpretation regarding the use of LAST NAME, FIRST NAME... i.e. Prince William’s tutor was told to never address him by his last NAME... ('sur' Name = Surety Name... something we should all want to be GETTIN AWAY from... hence why some pursue Trust Interpretation... i.e. where you become the beneficiary (and liability is transferred to the legal title holder or trustee)... or recipient of the certificate of evidence which becomes a form of incomplete or "imperfect" equitable title... (i.e. you still need additional process to make it complete or a "perfected" equitable title) or essentially a non trustee operator of the "beneficiary" which is really the corporate legal entity aka the REGISTERED NAME, a legally recognized PERSON (form of corporation) in the statutory legal realm..)
In private trust you are always addressed by first NAME only, and only after it has been granted... We all know how obsessed Michael Jackson was/is about Royalty, and being the "King" of pop and all that identification?... and he wanted badly to "escape" the system... and listen to his reasoning... It’s exactly what Michael Jackson would have said about his own dad!... LOL! Alas, you could never address him incorrectly... you would always be identifying him by his FIRST NAME... He even say's it's his "own NAME" (ours is "issued" to us after being "created" and "recorded" in a Register, a process that creates a legal title held by the Registrar) In MJ's case, he probably just registered Notice of the creation of it, and thus holds both titles... Legal and Equitable... with his money he can take on all the liability or set up his own trust... (who knows exactly...?)
It’s brilliant in a way... wouldn’t you seek the knowledge if you knew about this (which we do) and you had unlimited amounts of money... You just have to sit down with a Trust lawyer who works for the Federal government preferably, or someone with a Trust Background who works for the Registrar General (or whoever is the issuer of the BCs) and set up a private discussion... (not an easy thing to do for the "general public")
David Bowie hangs up his laurels... transitions to another life (in his private capacity)
The truth is stranger then fiction (when looked at especially while living in a world of fiction I would imagine...
Elvis’ death was full of controversy, as were the circumstances of his life just before he died, it's an incredible story in it's own right, but now in context, it makes a lot more sense... especially since it looks like he was under some kind of protection (fiduciary trustee relationship) with the government, etc... right up to his "Death" even surrounding how the NAME on his tombstone was incorrectly spelt?
(Why is that relevant? Besides the impossibility of it being a legitimate "mistake" and even if it was... that it was NEVER "properly" corrected, etc?... Consider that the NAMES of Ships, Corporations, and PERSONS (which are the source of the NAMES on Tombstones, which are actually LEGAL NOTICE of transference of Title back to the State) are spelt in upper case... Since they are all LEGALLY considered to be Legal Vessels, DEAD CORPORATE LEGAL ENTITIES... And Admiralty Law is the only place where you will find proof of the origin of this grammatical form... (now go look at the grammatical style of all your credit cards, driver's license, bank accounts, etc... all of which can ultimately be linked back to your BIRTH CERTIFICATE (Certificate of BERTH) the very first legal property that you REGISTERED (which means you split title and created a legal title and an equitable title, left the legal title with the registrar (and all that that implies) and you received a certificate (imperfect equitable title) that can be expressed via a proper trust interpretation into a perfected equitable title thus establishing a powerful and automatic trust... A trust interpretation so powerful that it supersedes ALL OTHER LAW FORMS... Because it is, was, and will always remain the first and most fundamental and foundational law form, going back literally to Biblical times and ancient Rome.
then Michael Jackson...
and now David Bowie...
(and David Bowie definitely knew about the NAME...) There was an article many years ago... according to a music enthusiast friend of mine, (who knows nothing about CR..)...and he mentioned to me that he read this article about David Bowie going through a process where he was removing his signature from all previous documents he was involved with... and that he then became incredibly wealthy after that...
He was also known to have created Bonds against his music... and essentially borrowed millions... so he has toyed and looked into the financial aspect of credit, how money is created, Bonds and Securities... financial concepts that have been used to describe the various mechanisms behind the Birth Certificate ever since 1933 and the removal of all money of substance (gold) from the public to be held by the government (in trust by definition) And he definitely did "something" along some kind of legal interpretation many years ago... having to do with his signature!...(at least according to this friend, and I do see this as an independent confirmation, because I know he knew nothing about my CR research... ) (it looks like if you make enough money and you are inquisitive enough... you can probably sit down and talk to someone ("in private" no doubt) and take CONTROL of your own REGISTERED NAME.... And you would certainly want to if you have any appreciation at all for what happens from a "legal title" point of view when you "REGISTER" anything into a "Public Registrar" (although it has a private side too by definition)
Check out this one on Michael Jackson... (It’s oh so obvious...) and he has chosen to rename himself with TWO FIRST NAMES!... and is quoted in the video as saying he wanted to "create HIS OWN PERSON..." Do you think he knew about the NAME... ??? There is no way any of this could be a coincidence if you understand the implications of what he is saying and doing...
DAVE DAVE !!! The VOICE...
I1bLuFcMKWA
Not a hoax but a transition from the public into a private trust interpretation in relation to the REGISTERED NAME...
Notice also how David Bowie has carefully selected two FIRST NAMES as well...
(how many people use "Steven" without the s as a last name?)
Listen to this David Bowie interview where he is now "Jack" "Steven"
100% Proof David Bowie Is Alive - His Death Was A "Hoax" - Appears On Sky News As "Jack" "Steven"
vp3Z_PrYvQk
And you can hear his cryptic responses... he is essentially revealing to us that he coming back into public as a different NAME!... (I would love to see the paperwork on how he has set this up!)
David Bowie Death "Hoax" - Alive And Well As "Jack Steven" (Two FIRST NAMES) On Sky News
0r2Dn_dSS40
The two people interviewing him... either know or at least should be suspicious, even if only on a subconscious level... and isn’t it odd, no one even mentions how much at the very least, that his looks would at least "remind" them of David Bowie... ?? Not one mention!?... you would think that would be the first thing that would come to ANYONE’s mind! But that was probably agreed to, BEFORE the interview ... not to discuss it... ???
The REGISTERED UPPER CASE NAME, in Admiralty Law is a LEGAL VESSEL, A Corporate Entity, is considered by the court system as a LEGALLY DEAD ENTITY (it needs to be operated, or MOVED by a living soul)
Think about it... he was totally hinting about it in his last album... almost playing on the Christ imagery (in reverse, mirror image fashion) The result being one last huge blast, of publicity and album sales for years to come... He’s set for life... and now all he wants is his "freedom" back... how to get that?... He needs a new "identity" which goes back to being a legal/private/trust issue...
With enough money he would be able to find someone who would talk to him...
And the teeth can’t be faked, there is no comparison between those teeth. The other guy whoever he is... Was just a faked, one off interview, to add a thread of plausibility... He probably signed a non-disclosure, or the interview piece was bought outright and copyrighted, etc... he could have been paid a "King’s ransom to do a 5 minute spot (on nothing in particular) just to put one tiny thread out there... That one video... that is all you will ever find in the past on YouTube of the previous "general public" "Jack Steven" on YouTube... LOL!!
Those are real teeth on real gums (on Bowie) He had very distinctive large, unmistakable teeth... and no way the other supposed "Jack Steven" fixed a gap on his, and his teeth and ended up looking like David Bowie's teeth????? (he doesn't even look like him facially really... the Sky News "Jack" "Steven" looks so much more like David Bowie!!! (because he IS... (or was) BOWIE, DAVID (the legal Estate)
There is nothing shadowy about it at all, it does make perfect sense from a private trust point of view... He’s made enough money... he may have either closed off his past Estate or set it up as a trust and now he wants to operate in the public... as "Jack" "Steven" (the giveaway is "Steven" without an s, is hardly ever used as a last name...?) so he must be getting the same legal advice that Michael Jackson got... for some reason they both chose... FIRST NAME, FIRST NAME (or perhaps Middle, but NO LAST NAME or Sir (Sur) NAME, which is often associated with Surety, some interpretations believing Sir is derived from Surety, just like Jordan Maxwell, Winston and many others show the play on words to hide these connections in public like Birth and Berth, etc...
As further confirmation, this is a direct reference to a story which supports this interpretation regarding the use of LAST NAME, FIRST NAME... i.e. Prince William’s tutor was told to never address him by his last NAME... ('sur' Name = Surety Name... something we should all want to be GETTIN AWAY from... hence why some pursue Trust Interpretation... i.e. where you become the beneficiary (and liability is transferred to the legal title holder or trustee)... or recipient of the certificate of evidence which becomes a form of incomplete or "imperfect" equitable title... (i.e. you still need additional process to make it complete or a "perfected" equitable title) or essentially a non trustee operator of the "beneficiary" which is really the corporate legal entity aka the REGISTERED NAME, a legally recognized PERSON (form of corporation) in the statutory legal realm..)
In private trust you are always addressed by first NAME only, and only after it has been granted... We all know how obsessed Michael Jackson was/is about Royalty, and being the "King" of pop and all that identification?... and he wanted badly to "escape" the system... and listen to his reasoning... It’s exactly what Michael Jackson would have said about his own dad!... LOL! Alas, you could never address him incorrectly... you would always be identifying him by his FIRST NAME... He even say's it's his "own NAME" (ours is "issued" to us after being "created" and "recorded" in a Register, a process that creates a legal title held by the Registrar) In MJ's case, he probably just registered Notice of the creation of it, and thus holds both titles... Legal and Equitable... with his money he can take on all the liability or set up his own trust... (who knows exactly...?)
It’s brilliant in a way... wouldn’t you seek the knowledge if you knew about this (which we do) and you had unlimited amounts of money... You just have to sit down with a Trust lawyer who works for the Federal government preferably, or someone with a Trust Background who works for the Registrar General (or whoever is the issuer of the BCs) and set up a private discussion... (not an easy thing to do for the "general public")