Fighting Back & Winning Against Monsanto (for defamation)

[sigma6]

Scientist Attacked for Proving GMO Dangers Wins Defamation Suit in French Court

http://www.realfarmacy.com/seralini-defamation-lawsuit/

http://www.realfarmacy.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Seralini-study-defamation.jpg


Remember Professor Giles-Eric Seralini and his research team at the University of Caan in France? They provided pictures of rats fed Monsanto GMO corn saturated with Roundup weed killer. That’s why the corn is genetically modified, to survive the most dangerous herbicide on the planet.

Their study discovered that rats fed GMOs developed tumors and died prematurely. But that wasn’t the purpose of their study. It was set up to examine the long term toxicity potential of eating Monsanto’s GMO corn along with the inherent exposure to Roundup.

After Seralini’s long term toxicity study results were publicized with displays of rats showing huge tumors, a tsunami of outrage from pro-GMO scientists and shill journalists got favorable mainstream media (MSM) press.



The hundreds of scientists who defended Seralini’s work were mostly ignored. Many fence sitters were left confused and willing to side with the barking dogs of the biotechnology industry.

Monsanto Influenced a Journal to Retract Seralini’s Report

This highly publicized media attack of Seralini and his team was the air and sea attack to soften the defense of the tiny GMO truther island. Then the actual landing attack against that island’s real science was embarked by surreptitiously setting up former Monsanto scientist Richard E. Goodman in a newly created biotech editorial position at the journal Food and Chemical Toxicology (FCT), an Elsevier publication...

[Mike]

I recently emailed a company called 'vitacoco' (coconut water) and asked if their product had any gmo ingredients in it.

A woman replied almost immediately:

"...vitococo products are natural, but not presently certified non gmo. we are actively working on obtaining non gmo certifications..."

I thought it was a very slick answer, actually...as it heavily implied one thing without actually answering the question directly.

So I wrote back, and politely reasked the question, pointing out that "natural" was such a vague and all encompassing word and therfore rather meaningless. this time I asked for a simple yes/no answer to the question "are there presently any gmo ingredients in your coconut water?" That was a week ago. I havent heard back.

(I hope this is ok to post here Sigma)

[sigma6]

I recently emailed a company called 'vitacoco' (coconut water) and asked if their product had any gmo ingredients in it.

A woman replied almost immediately:

"...vitococo products are natural, but not presently certified non gmo. we are actively working on obtaining non gmo certifications..."

I thought it was a very slick answer, actually...as it heavily implied one thing without actually answering the question directly.

So I wrote back, and politely reasked the question, pointing out that "natural" was such a vague and all encompassing word and therfore rather meaningless. this time I asked for a simple yes/no answer to the question "are there presently any gmo ingredients in your coconut water?" That was a week ago. I havent heard back.

(I hope this is ok to post here Sigma)

No I think it's great... but she did stress we are working on obtaining NON GMO certifications... I think that speaks volumes, that's huge...
that tells you that money is finally talking, that means THEY KNOW CONSUMERS ARE ONTO THIS...

[Mike]

I recently emailed a company called 'vitacoco' (coconut water) and asked if their product had any gmo ingredients in it.

A woman replied almost immediately:

"...vitococo products are natural, but not presently certified non gmo. we are actively working on obtaining non gmo certifications..."

I thought it was a very slick answer, actually...as it heavily implied one thing without actually answering the question directly.

So I wrote back, and politely reasked the question, pointing out that "natural" was such a vague and all encompassing word and therfore rather meaningless. this time I asked for a simple yes/no answer to the question "are there presently any gmo ingredients in your coconut water?" That was a week ago. I havent heard back.

(I hope this is ok to post here Sigma)

No I think it's great... but she did stress we are working on obtaining NON GMO certifications... I think that speaks volumes, that's huge...
that tells you that money is finally talking, that means THEY KNOW CONSUMERS ARE ONTO THIS...


true,true. it is huge, no doubt. and afterwards i even wondered if i wasnt being a little too suspicious....its just that i'm so used to being jerked around, ya know?

[Michelle Marie]

I recently emailed a company called 'vitacoco' (coconut water) and asked if their product had any gmo ingredients in it.

A woman replied almost immediately:

"...vitococo products are natural, but not presently certified non gmo. we are actively working on obtaining non gmo certifications..."

I thought it was a very slick answer, actually...as it heavily implied one thing without actually answering the question directly.

So I wrote back, and politely reasked the question, pointing out that "natural" was such a vague and all encompassing word and therfore rather meaningless. this time I asked for a simple yes/no answer to the question "are there presently any gmo ingredients in your coconut water?" That was a week ago. I havent heard back.

(I hope this is ok to post here Sigma)

No I think it's great... but she did stress we are working on obtaining NON GMO certifications... I think that speaks volumes, that's huge...
that tells you that money is finally talking, that means THEY KNOW CONSUMERS ARE ONTO THIS...


true,true. it is huge, no doubt. and afterwards i even wondered if i wasnt being a little too suspicious....its just that i'm so used to being jerked around, ya know?

No, it's a good question. Deceptions like this exist. We can learn to be more intuitive, and use our energy to raise the vibration of our foods. We have solutions. Don't question your true gut feelings, though.

We are learning...

Love into the foods,
MM :heart:

[Mike]

I recently emailed a company called 'vitacoco' (coconut water) and asked if their product had any gmo ingredients in it.

A woman replied almost immediately:

"...vitococo products are natural, but not presently certified non gmo. we are actively working on obtaining non gmo certifications..."

I thought it was a very slick answer, actually...as it heavily implied one thing without actually answering the question directly.

So I wrote back, and politely reasked the question, pointing out that "natural" was such a vague and all encompassing word and therfore rather meaningless. this time I asked for a simple yes/no answer to the question "are there presently any gmo ingredients in your coconut water?" That was a week ago. I havent heard back.

(I hope this is ok to post here Sigma)

No I think it's great... but she did stress we are working on obtaining NON GMO certifications... I think that speaks volumes, that's huge...
that tells you that money is finally talking, that means THEY KNOW CONSUMERS ARE ONTO THIS...


true,true. it is huge, no doubt. and afterwards i even wondered if i wasnt being a little too suspicious....its just that i'm so used to being jerked around, ya know?



in fairness, i need to point out that i was later assured by vitacoco execs that there are no gmo's in their coconut water.