Preventing the Next U.S. False Flag Event

[Arcturian108]

Hi Folks,
This was just posted today, and I think it is worth sharing, although the original article which can be seen here (http://memoryholeblog.com/2016/02/21/exposing-obamas-next-big-false-flag-before-it-happens/) is quite long.
We have all become aware of the many false flag events that have happened in America, but we haven't been able to think of a strategy to prevent them before they happen. So far we have noted how most people are fooled into believing that these drills that "go live" are real. The author of the article wants this information shared, and thus this will become the first thread that I am posting to the Avalon site since becoming a member.

The article begins as follows:


February 21, 2016
Exposing Obama’s Next BIG False-Flag… Before it Happens
by Kevin Scott King

"Since Obama has been in office numerous mass shooting events have occurred. Particular ones of note:
• Fort Hood – Fort Hood, TX Round 1 – Nov 2009
• Gabbie Giffords, Tuscon, AZ – Jan, 2011
• Batman Shooting, Aurora, CO – July 2012
• Sandy Hook Shooting, Newtown, CT – Dec 2012
• Navy Yard Shooting, Washington, D.C – Sept 2013
• Fort Hood – Fort Hood, TX Round 2 – Apr 2014
• Charleston Church, Charleston, SC – June 2015
• Umpqua College Shooting, Roseburg, OR – Oct 2015
• San Bernardino Shooting, San Bernardino, CA – Dec 2015

Most have substantial and significant evidence of false-flag events, with the primary goal of pushing the Gun-Control agenda. But so far this has not been working. If anything it is backfiring. Every time one of these events occurs there is a spike in gun sales. So instead of making people afraid of guns, it’s making people afraid not to own one. The gun-control propaganda is not working as intended. I attribute this to several factors.
First, Americans entertain themselves with a tremendous amount of gun violence. TV, movies, video games. And what does this exposure teach us? That those who have guns have power, and those who don’t are nothing but victims. Second, and in conjunction with the first, pro-gun propaganda. Really, it is more accurate to call it pro-war propaganda. Because it’s darn hard to be pro-war without being pro-gun. The classic image of the modern soldier is always with their rifle. Third, the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution; “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” Fourth, over saturation of false-flag events. I recently heard someone claim that false-flags are a modern phenomenon. I strongly disagree. People using deception (false-flags) for their own gain is not a modern phenomenon, it is ancient. However, what is a modern phenomenon is the systemic nature of current false-flags and the massive volume of false-flags that are occurring now. This over-saturation, plus just the shear amount of noise in our mass media, causes each successive event to have less impact."


Read more (http://memoryholeblog.com/2016/02/21/exposing-obamas-next-big-false-flag-before-it-happens/)
Towards the end of the article, the author speculates as to what would be the elements of the next major false flag event. Jump to that section to see what he thinks.

[mojo]

Welcome and thanks for sharing...

[Matt P]

Let me second Mojo's welcome and play devil's advocate for just a moment in honor of your first post. Nothing the controllers do is by accident. The fact that gun sales have gone up after each of these obvious false flags might show us that is what they want. If you wanted to eliminate guns, you wouldn't keep doing something that increases the number of gun sales, would you? I have heard some interesting theories about this, some people actually thinking the false flags are a way of protecting us by inspiring us to be armed. Not that this is my belief, I just find it interesting that gun sales are going through the roof because of what they're doing and they can't be that stupid surely. Or would they want increased gun sales hoping for more acted out aggression and justification for more gun laws?

Matt

[Arcturian108]

Matt,
You have a point. I have read something similar to this idea a few months back. I still think though, that they are trying to demonize gun owners to the point where the majority of Americans decide to require legislation to tighten gun laws, and eventually register every owner, etc. How this played out in Australia in 1996 is very instructive. They first found a patsy, plastered the news media with a digitally-corrected crazed look on Martin Bryant, a young man who had an I.Q. of 70, and then within weeks told everyone in the country to surrender their guns, and they did.

[Redstar Kachina]

..........

[Yetti]

Thanks Arcturian, you placed very well, many if not all those false flag events like the Saint Bernardino, I remember the day when happens, I was watching TV at the moment of the news report they where following the suspects , video shows police entering lawn of some houses in search for the 3rd suspect , then... where is it? Second, they where following the suv from behind, but later videos shown the suv like a colander from the front,...? None of the survivors was interviewed in the mainstream media to confirm any of this......!! And again, all the proves found very conveniently to fit the story ( if any of you have seen the movie Wag the dog, You will know what I'm talking about). Like the passport of Mohamed atta, at the WTC , givemeabrake! for god sake! you need to be retarded to believe such a BS . The are lying to us BIG TIME, our only weapon is INFORMATION of course outside of Fox, CNN, or any corporate media.

[ljwheat]

What if these false flags have been intentionally set to achieve more guns in the hands of the general public"? If the government shuts off the grid for lets say just " 60 days. "

No power, the entire country ,, All will turn on each other, for Gas - then food - then life itself. Then power if you survive may or may not come back. when you run out of ammo then what.

They turn on the power and clean up the mess, or whats left of it... World War III is less a scary idea than a young family with kids needing to eat, that own a gun or two..

So the more Guns are sold to the general public will be the catch 22 no one is looking at..... and the end as we know it at our own hand.

[Falien]

What if these false flags have been intentionally set to achieve more guns in the hands of the general public"? If the government shuts off the grid for lets say just " 60 days. "

No power, the entire country ,, All will turn on each other, for Gas - then food - then life itself. Then power if you survive may or may not come back. when you run out of ammo then what.

They turn on the power and clean up the mess, or whats left of it... World War III is less a scary idea than a young family with kids needing to eat, that own a gun or two..

So the more Guns are sold to the general public will be the catch 22 no one is looking at..... and the end as we know it at our own hand.

that does seem like the most logical rout.
Were in a age were neighbor hate neighbor.
They would shoot each other if they thought they could get away with it.
Beside a gun would do nothing against a tank so to speak.
Not to mention this leak that they want to make gun control didn't seem right.
Logical you release false information to get the people to do what you want.

People are taught to hate there family and hate there neighbor.
This age is taught to be selfless and look down onto other.
To hate those that a different.
And to be use to seeing such horror.
It be very easy for people to take each other out.
They would do it on believe and because there scared to trust.
(they just need some type of an excuses)

Think about those zombie movies what if there not actually fighting zombies.
That the norm of people would be shooting each other.
The one betray as zombie could be those that can't defend themselves.
Those that only have words as weapons.
(just a thought)

[GrnEggsNHam]

What if these false flags have been intentionally set to achieve more guns in the hands of the general public"? If the government shuts off the grid for lets say just " 60 days. "

No power, the entire country ,, All will turn on each other, for Gas - then food - then life itself. Then power if you survive may or may not come back. when you run out of ammo then what.

They turn on the power and clean up the mess, or whats left of it... World War III is less a scary idea than a young family with kids needing to eat, that own a gun or two..

So the more Guns are sold to the general public will be the catch 22 no one is looking at..... and the end as we know it at our own hand.

I've said something similar before (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88354-Something-is-afoot...&p=1039709&viewfull=1#post1039709)and I feel it goes right along with this theory.

One of the most popular shows in the United States is "The Walking Dead". In this show people are in constant conflict with each other to survive in a post apocalyptic world. The main characters start out as caring and trusting humans. However their trusting nature and kindness are constantly taken advantage of. I think this is exactly how the Elite are hoping everyone will act when the lights go out.

I've read the graphic novels and must admit that I do enjoy watching the show myself :blushing:. I'm just afraid of how many people will use the show as a survival script in the scenario you've suggested :fear:.