View Full Version : Wi-Fi & Smart Meters : ‘Wireless Wake-Up Call’ health dangers of Electromagnetic Fields
Cidersomerset
22nd February 2016, 18:07
This is not a new debate but is still not fully recognised yet , in this talk Jeromy
Johnson explains his experience and ideas about the problem.
F0NEaPTu9oI
A Silicon-valley engineer turned technology health advocate, Jeromy Johnson
discusses our attachment to technology and the health hazards such an addiction
may hold.
Jeromy Johnson is an expert in mitigating the negative impacts of Electromagnetic
Field (EMF) exposure. He has a leading website on the topic and consults with
individuals, families and organizations around the world to implement solutions that
reduce and eliminate EMF pollution. Jeromy has an advanced degree in Civil
Engineering and has worked in Silicon Valley for 15 years. After becoming what
medical doctors call “Electro-hypersensitive” (EHS) in 2011 after extensive
exposure to EMF radiation, he embarked on a journey of regaining his own health
and educating others to critically evaluate theirs.
===================================================
EMF Health Alert Issued By Former Silicon Valley Tech Expert: ‘Wireless Wake-Up Call’
By David on 22nd February 2016 Corporate Crime, Medical/Health
http://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Untitled-4-10.jpg
Awareness continues to increase surrounding the health dangers of Electromagnetic
Fields (EMFs) emanating from our daily gadgets, as well as from the rise of the Smart
Grid. Over the last few years we have witnessed a range of experts declare their
concern about the current path we are on.
A prominent neuroscientist has gone on record in a lecture to the medical community
itself where he exposed the many health risks as well as an industry-wide attempt by
telecom to cover up the negative consequences. A world-renown biochemist has sought
to abolish WiFi in schools. And a British ER physician has made it her mission to educate
people about what steps they can take to minimize exposure and damage to WiFi. A
slew of peer-review scientific studies have supported the warnings of these experts.’
http://www.activistpost.com/2016/02/emf-health-alert-issued-by-tech-expert.html
Cidersomerset
22nd February 2016, 18:20
SMART METERS & EMF RADIATION ➜ The Health Crisis Of Our Time!
8RP7vmFeo0k
Published on 30 Dec 2012
★ If You Care About Your Health You Must Watch this insightful interview with
Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt MD from the spectacular and pivotal documentary film
"Take Back Your Power" about Smart Meters + EMF Radiation.
http://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/smart_meter_radiation.png
Bob
22nd February 2016, 18:41
Good to see this coming back up again. The books put out by Robert. O. Becker, "The Body Electric" is the most accurate that I have seen as to how cells can be altered by potential placed across them.. I don't think Becker had enough lab analysis to show DNA, or chromosome alteration.
Many organizations (read lobbies) have poo poo'd EM assault on the body. Saying it is ONLY the thermal absorption that can be dangerous based on the frequency of the assault, and which body organ is heated up (and they point out from celltowers, powerlines, tv towers, radio towers one simply does NOT get heating unless one is connected TO the antenna with sitting on it, or a hand grabbing it)...
However, what was hidden in the lobbies, is the "SCALAR" component can do the deed of creating harm. That was hidden, that was blocked, that was steered far far away from. The scalar component happens with MULTI-PATH absorption, where reflections of the incoming wave plus the direct wave interact in tissue, or a resistive absorbative substance...
ref: http://www.wirelessimpacts.org/science/becker.html - "the Body Electric" Linda M. Howe interview with Becker on bio-effects of British cellphones
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Body_Electric_(book) - wiki - "the Body Electric"
http://www.theseekerbooks.com/articles/electric.htm - Dr. Becker's 1990 book, Cross Currents, The Perils of Electropollution - here Becker shows how the immune system is compromised by EM assault.
and https://www.kirkusreviews.com/book-reviews/breyten-breytenbach-3/the-body-electric-electromagnetism-and-the-foun/
Cidersomerset
22nd February 2016, 19:05
These vids are from 2011 and are bit academic and a little heavy going.I started
watching them to get a mainstream view of the problem , though it is five years old
2011 Dr Bann: Wireless Radiation is a Class 2 B Carcinogen Classification
AtnH1zwfRK8
Published on 22 Nov 2015
Listen to World Health expert Dr. Bann describe the classification of wireless as a
Class 2 B carcinogen. This Seminar can be accessed in full at http://www.swinburne.edu.au/lss/bpsyc...
==================================================
Q and A Interview with World Health Organization Dr. Bann on Wireless a Class 2 B Carcinogen
YbBTFZ5Kezc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbBTFZ5Kezc
==================================================
Panel Discussion on Wireless RF EMF as a Carcinogen
jqiL405AbYA
Published on 22 Nov 2015
World Health Experts and Australian experts discuss wireless. Watch this
Symposium on Radiofrequency (including Mobile Phones) and Public Health
at Swinburne University on 2014
Cidersomerset
22nd February 2016, 20:10
How to avoid EMF radiation risks from computers, microwaves, cell phones, and other household items
6sIeKRhclQI
Published on 22 Jul 2013
An EMF detector shows the dangerous health risks present in your everyday life.
That includes Microwave ovens, Laptop computers, Cell Phones, Refrigerators
and solutions on how to avoid them.
onawah
22nd February 2016, 21:06
There's a guy named Lloyd Burrell who has a website here:
http://www.electricsense.com/emf-protection-store/ who does frequent interviews with experts on the problems with EMF sensitivity.
You can email him at lloyd@electricsense.com to get added to his free newsletter list.
Kano
22nd February 2016, 21:29
This is a very timely post. This is not a new topic to me but it has been out of sight and out of mind and my most recent project at work is bidding on a complete WiFi and beacon infrastructure overhaul at the San Francisco Airport. We have already done 2 terminals as Proof of Concept but I would be willing to bet that no one at my company, as smart as most of them are, has any idea about WiFi as a carcinogen and a health hazard.
Thanks Cider for the very relevant post.
ponda
23rd February 2016, 00:15
Here's another possible EMF protection option.I don't know if it works but it sounds promising.You can get personal protection where ever you go and a stronger protection at home.There is plenty of info at the website.
cheers
http://www.blushield.com.au/
Kano
23rd February 2016, 01:35
Here's another possible EMF protection option.I don't know if it works but it sounds promising.You can get personal protection where ever you go and a stronger protection at home.There is plenty of info at the website.
cheers
http://www.blushield.com.au/
Wow, wonder why so expensive?
ponda
23rd February 2016, 01:58
Kano said:
Wow, wonder why so expensive?
Well it might not be perceived as being expensive if you get constant 90 meter protection around your house from cell phone towers,3g/4g/5g etc,wi-fi,neighbours routers,smart meters,power lines etc for $349 or 3 meter personal protection where ever you go for $179.
It probably depends on how dangerous these EMF fields are and how much protection the devices give you.If you get 100% protection and EMF's are dangerous to humans health then the devices could be perceived as being good value.
cheers
Kano
23rd February 2016, 16:09
Kano said:
Wow, wonder why so expensive?
Well it might not be perceived as being expensive if you get constant 90 meter protection around your house from cell phone towers,3g/4g/5g etc,wi-fi,neighbours routers,smart meters,power lines etc for $349 or 3 meter personal protection where ever you go for $179.
It probably depends on how dangerous these EMF fields are and how much protection the devices give you.If you get 100% protection and EMF's are dangerous to humans health then the devices could be perceived as being good value.
cheers
True, "expensive" is a relative term. The spirit of my question was surrounding the fact that since most people live paycheck to paycheck, such protection is unattainable for the average person and clearly from these videos, we are ALL exposed to this radiation to varying degrees. It just seems that there has to be a more efficient way to combat these frequencies.
TargeT
23rd February 2016, 17:17
How to avoid EMF radiation risks from computers, microwaves, cell phones, and other household items
6sIeKRhclQI
Published on 22 Jul 2013
An EMF detector shows the dangerous health risks present in your everyday life.
That includes Microwave ovens, Laptop computers, Cell Phones, Refrigerators
and solutions on how to avoid them.
hold up a piece of paper and watch the EMF meter drop to zero (assuming very few reflective surfaces)... EMF can't penetrate much when it's in the high hz ranges... the only thing I'd be concerned about is possible resonance points at octaves that could effect us (as of now I know of no such phenomenon, though I think it's a possible one).
Nick Matkin
23rd February 2016, 17:24
The TEDx organization certainly lends credibility to the talk in the original post (#1). Sensible, measured, and from someone who is qualified to talk on the subject. A good, un-sensational summary of the matter.
But to anyone who is unfamiliar with the physics of EM radiation, I would caution against buying any 'EM Meters' that are not accurately calibrated, not clear what they are measuring (AC, DC, electrostatic, magnetic fields), don't differentiate what the frequency being measured is and don't show any units.
Good EMF meters are laboratory items and don't come cheap from Amazon or Ebay. Domestic quality ones give an indication that 'something' is being detected, but unless you understand what and how it's being detected you may be made unnecessarily anxious - or worse - wrongly assured that all is well. It might be said that the sale of these products to the general public is taking advantage of people's fear and lack of understanding.
Nick Matkin
23rd February 2016, 17:37
... the only thing I'd be concerned about is possible resonance points at octaves that could effect us (as of now I know of no such phenomenon, though I think it's a possible one).
You've hit the nail on the head there sir!
A colleague told me that working on high-power radio transmitters with resonant wavelengths related to the dimensions of the human body are particularly dangerous. That would be for example say frequencies that have quarter wavelengths that are multiples of a person's height; say 2 metres = 150 MHz. So that would be approximately 37.5, 75, 150 MHz etc. And above that there is the RF heating effect.
RF engineers have only been bothered about resonance and heating effects in high RF fields, and to my knowledge we are not dropping like files or suffering from the vague symptoms of electro-sensitivity, reported to be caused by RF fields many orders of magnitude weaker. (Tragically there has been at least one case where a transmitter engineer was accidentally cooked to death while working on very high power TV transmitter antenna.)
Nevertheless, I'm not suggesting electro-sensitivity does not exist (the video in the OP clearly suggests that it does), but it needs thorough investigation.
Cidersomerset
23rd February 2016, 19:28
Nevertheless, I'm not suggesting electro-sensitivity does not exist (the
video in the OP clearly suggests that it does), but it needs thorough investigation
The conclusion from the 2011 reviews of studies in post 4 above seemed to be
that there was not enough evidence either way.
This is probably the easiest to understand out of the three I posted....
YbBTFZ5Kezc
==================================================
An article from todays headline page.....
Great balls of fire! Mobile phones are ‘cooking’ men’s sperm
By David on 23rd February 2016 Medical/Health
http://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/56cafcf9c461889c648b4601.jpg
‘Using a mobile phone for even one hour a day can be so damaging to sperm
that men may develop difficulties conceiving, fertility experts have warned.
A study by British scientists has found that exposure to mobile phones close
to the testicles, or within a foot or two of the body, can ‘cook’ sperm,
dramatically reducing its levels.
Results from the study showed that men who keep their phones in their pocket
during the day had reduced sperm levels in 47 percent of cases, as opposed to
just 11 percent of the general population.’
Read more: Great balls of fire! Mobile phones are ‘cooking’ men’s sperm
https://www.rt.com/uk/333265-mobile-phones-sperm-count/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome
Cidersomerset
23rd February 2016, 19:49
I was trying to remember where I had heard about this subject and it was the
interviews with Barrie Trower . Some interesting concepts including that the high
amount of Police violence is due to Tetra, he explains this and more.....
This may explain why police violence has gone up ......
http://www.tetramodem.com/fileadmin/images/DVI_Transformer_DSL_s.jpg
Royal Navy microwave weapons Researcher Barrie Trower Says That WiFi Is Killing Us And Quickly
kajCFDbyttQ
Published on 4 Jan 2016
=================================================
POLICE VIOLENCE, CANCER AND STERILITY – THANKS TO NWO TECHNOLOGY
19th September 2015Current African News, Health, New World Order
Dr. Barrie Trower is a physicist, he has been a microwave weapons researcher for
the Royal Navy and British Intelligence and is a pre-eminent expert on microwave
technology and the health effects of Wifi and other forms of microwave radiation.
Fortunately for us he is also a decent and caring person who now spends his time
sharing his wealth of knowledge to warn the general public about this; unlike many
governments like those of the USA, Britain, South Africa, Rwanda and Nigeria
among others, who are dishing out this technology without issuing any health
warnings. In fact these governments are in denial of any of the adverse effects on
our physical and mental health.
http://africanagenda.net/police-violence-cancer-and-sterility-thanks-to-nwo-technology/
Cidersomerset
23rd February 2016, 20:50
This is a more indepth interview..... He explains how ? why ? where ? when ?
this has developed from the cold war experiments from the 1950's thru to today.
Barrie Trower Talks with Victims of Non Consensual Microwave and EMF Experimentation and Testing
2v4hahbvJ6I
Published on 16 Jan 2015
Barrie Trower Talks with Victims of Non Consensual Microwave and EMF Experimentation and Testing Trower
EMF EMR Experimentation Phone Tower Cell Mast Danger Microwave Victim
Antenna Arpansa Dr.smart meters Scientist MICROWAVE WEAPONRY'S USE ON PEOPLE Weapon physicist UK Australian
emrrfsa Health DNA Damage RF radiation Electromagnetic Radiation Mast Victims Deborah Tavares SmartMetersMurder
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CELLDAR....
http://www.itsinternational.com/EasysiteWeb/getresource.axd?AssetID=29550&type=custom&servicetype=Inline&customSizeId=18
http://www.itsinternational.com/categories/detection-monitoring-machine-vision/features/wireless-traffic-data-in-real-time/
http://www.declarepeace.org.uk/captain/murder_inc/site/pics/celldar.jpg
http://www.declarepeace.org.uk/captain/murder_inc/site/grid.html
Cidersomerset
25th February 2016, 21:32
Smart Meter Hijinks At State Level
By David on 25th February 2016 Big Brother, Corporate Crime, Medical/Health
http://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Untitled-413.jpg
‘Here in Southeast Pennsylvania, where I live, there’s been a tremendous push to install
AMI Smart Meters, which many consumers really are afraid of for various reasons, but
have forced on to them and their properties by “hard ball” tactics utilities like PECO, an
Exelon Company, and the PA Public Utility Commission engage in.
Recently, Pennsylvania Smart Meter Awareness (PASMA) sent out a press release which,
I think, indicates what’s really going on, i.e., the utilities and PUC are the ones breaking
Act 129, which they claim they have to enforce all while harassing people, since it’s the
law! Plus, there are no opt-outs for any reason, while numerous opt-out bills languish in
the PA House Consumer Affairs Committee because the committee chair, Robert Godshall,
whose son works for PECO, vows he will never call any opt-out bills for a vote, thereby
denying Pennsylvanians of their right to redress government on a critical health I
ssue—electromagnetic pollution from microwaves that operate smart meters.’
Read more: Smart Meter Hijinks At State Level
http://www.naturalblaze.com/2016/02/smart-meter-hijinks-at-state-level.html
ponda
7th June 2016, 13:39
Just found some more EMF protection options after listening to the interview below.
Elizabeth Plourde "EMF Pollution Is Invading Our Cells, Killing Children & Causing Infertility!"
The Richie Allen Show
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7UjrABiu84
Here's the link for the Safety Products http://newvoice.net/shop/emf-products.html
I'm one of these emf sensitive people....headache, brain fog..even heart stress. But it's mostly when i'm using a wifi device. Just plain ol wifi will occasionally give me symptoms..but mainly its when im on.the smart phone or.computer.
But my newest symptom is stinging eyes. I don't mean tired, blurry vision from having been on the computer too long...I mean stinging, watery eyes within minutes of using my smart phone that will sometimes last for 10-15 mins after i'm done using it.
I'm getting it right now.
It's a very real phenomenon(these symptoms)...and yet, ridicule remains. " It's all in your head", right?:ROFL: I just love that one. I mean..is there anything more arrogant than another person assuming they know more about your personal experience with wifi than you do? Ive had this experience several times..
So i'm glad respected professionals are standing up. Science really needs to take a closer look
Cidersomerset
7th June 2016, 21:06
The Richie Allen Show on Davidicke.com: Elizabeth Plourde - 'EMF Pollution Is Invading Our Cells, Killing Children & Causing Infertility'
By David on 7 June 2016 GMT
https://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/get-attachment-488.jpg
Elizabeth Plourde "EMF Pollution Is Invading Our Cells, Killing Children & Causing Infertility!"
h7UjrABiu84
onawah
15th July 2016, 17:20
WI-FRIED?
z5ZOJZQbkmI
AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING COMPANY: CATALYST
Forbidden Knowledge TV | Jul 14, 2016 | Alexandra Bruce
[QUOTE]This documentary by Australia's ABC TV may change the way you look at your cell phone.
A scientific paper bravely published by a leading radiation biologist, Prof. Dariusz Leszczynski now allows top neurologists, like Keith Black, MD of Los Angeles' Cedars-Sinai Hospital to issue warnings to their patients about the dangers of cell phone use, which he describes as "Cooking the brain".
The cell phone industry retaliated against Leszczynski by lobbying to have his funding stopped and in the meantime, insurance companies in the US stopped coverage for health damages related to cell phone use.
Brain tumors associated with cell phone use has replaced leukemia as the number one child-killer. Men who store cell phones in their pockets are assured lower sperm counts and there is a rash of young women contracting breast cancer, in the very spot where they tuck their cellphones in their bras.
You can expect to receive the following measurable doses of radiation, using a standard radiation measuring device: 1) Microwave oven: 800 microvolts, 2) WiFi Router: 800 microvolts, 3) Tablet PC: 2,000 microvolts (watching a movie), 4) Smartphone: 40,000 microvolts (Samsung S3). This last device emits over a thousand times the normal background radiation level of 30 microvolts.
The use of cell phones and other wireless technologies is being called the next 'casualty catastrophe,' after tobacco and asbestos. iPhones now all contain a legal disclaimer page with fine print, which cannot be enlarged and which is relatively difficult to locate within the phone's navigation. It discloses the dangers of radiation exposure from cell phones and advises users to keep the device at least 10mm from the body - but it's next to impossible to find on the device.
After conducting studies, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) in Lyon, France has officially classified the radio wave radiation emitted by cellphones and other household devices (to say nothing of SmartMeters - which is a whole other video!) as a Class 2B Carcinogen (a possible cause of cancer). At the same time, a US wireless lobbying group called the CTIA assures us that "Radio waves from cell phones are safe" and studies paid for by the cell phone industry claim that, "Cell phone use causes no biological damage."
However, independent studies consistently report serious health effects, ranging from DNA damage, a 300% reduction in sperm counts, 290% more brain tumors, autism and birth defects.
Former senior White House adviser, Epidemiologist, Dr. Devra Davis, who appears in this film testified to the US Senate and has given a hair-raising reports about the back-stories behind these contradictory scientific reports: The independent scientists who reported on the ill effects of cell phones found themselves under attack by the cellphone industry, who would attempt to get them fired and to get their funding taken away or else accuse them of fraud. When that didn't work, they hired inexperienced scientists who didn't know anything about the subject to *look* like they were replicating the incriminating experiments - and when all of the above didn't work, they wrote an internal memo, in which they stated, "We war-gamed the science." To prove a point, one scientist wrote a paper on the subject, laden with obvious errors, which was published in numerous science journals and translated in over 15 countries.
Journalist, Anthony Gucciardi had previously proven how easy it is for industry to plant fake science in such publications in the very similar case involving the drug Prozac, which was long ago proven to increase the incidence of suicide among users and to cause violent behavior in the 1980s - but hidden from the public until 2005 until there was a BBC exposé.
In response, the manufacturers hired their own scientists to prove how "great" Prozac was. However, producers of anti-depressants today are forced to disclose these side effects, which one reads in their accompanying manuals or overhear, in the blindingly-fast and unintelligible disclosure statements that run during television advertisements for these products.
People who know the details believe that once the public becomes aware of these dangerous side effects, the public outcry will be worse than it was for cigarettes.
Dr. Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News since 1981 says, "The system is broken, nobody has been told the truth. It's crazy."
He says that it's one thing for the tobacco industry to finally admit to the dangers of smoking tar and nicotine, after centuries of being on the market because the science, which would eventually prove that cigarettes and secondhand smoke damaged human health did not yet exist when tobacco was initially marketed - but cell phones were launched after preliminary science was already available as to its inherent dangers and these products were released into the public without any safety studies, whatsoever!
The point is to take action. Action is already being taken in Europe: In Italy, a landmark supreme court ruling found a "causal link" between cell phone use and brain tumors. In France, WiFi is being taken down and replaced with cabled Internet in schools and countries from Germany to Israel and Finland are moving to stop cell phone sales to kids. In the UK, children under the age of 18, have been barred from cell phone use for several years, already.
But of course, in the Good Ol' USA, the former chief lobbyist for the wireless industry, Thomas Wheeler was appointed by President Barack Obama to head up the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which regulates the safety of wireless devices, in yet another astonishing conflict-of-interest in the choice of appointed US Federal Regulators, who better resemble wolves guarding the sheep than advocates for the health of the public at-large.
Cidersomerset
3rd September 2016, 09:53
Electromagnetic Fields And Their Effects
By David on 2 September 2016 GMT David Dees Art, Medical/Health
http://www.naturalblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/NBlogo1.jpg
Electromagnetic Fields and Their Effects
Posted on September 1, 2016
https://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/deesIllustration-picture-2.jpg
‘Can you see and feel its effects in the air? Of course you can, but you don’t know how
to identify it correctly! It’s all around us like an ocean of electromagnetic frequencies that
we are swimming in, which are pulsed out from many more sources than we can begin to
imagine and, more confoundedly, not accept that they are causing damage to all living
elements, especially young children who are most vulnerable.
I’m talking about electromagnetic fields (EMFs) or radiofrequencies (RFs), which have become
so ubiquitous that we haven’t stopped to realize what’s been happening to us—especially
children exposed to Wi-Fi in schools—and how trees [4] and other plant life are being damaged.
Where do these EMFs come from?
Microwaves that are emitted by cell phone and mast towers, cell phones, AMI smart meters for
electric, natural gas and water utilities, microwave ovens, and all ‘smart’ appliances that contain
ZigBee chips, which are two-way radio transmitters operating using microwave technologies.’
Read more: Electromagnetic Fields And Their Effects
http://www.naturalblaze.com/2016/09/electromagnetic-fields-effects.html
posted on another thread...
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?92559-The-Invisible-War-21st-Century-Targeting&p=1095135&viewfull=1#post1095135
Cidersomerset
3rd September 2016, 10:29
Utility Smart Meter Fires Continue To Burn
By David on 3 September 2016 GMT
https://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Untitled-129.jpg
‘Utility companies are installing AMI Smart Meters for electric, natural gas and water for
a few years now and totally disregarding customers’ rights and concerns about safety.
The rollout of these meters has caused numerous problems for consumers, the least of
which is FIRE! See this recently-produced video about an exploding AMI Smart Meter
in Kansas City, Missouri.’
yV_cHlxKoIE
Read more: Utility Smart Meter Fires Continue To Burn
http://www.naturalblaze.com/2016/09/smart-meter-fires.html
Cidersomerset
5th September 2016, 14:19
Action alert: 5G cellular technology will blanket planetary life with ultra-high microwave frequencies
By David on 5 September 2016 GMT
https://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Untitled-138-2.jpg
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/logo-nh365.png
Action alert: 5G cellular technology will blanket planetary life with ultra-high microwave frequencies
Posted by: Jonathan Landsman
The 5G revolution is rushing toward us and it will bring a whole new era of harm from ultra-high
microwave frequency radiation. And those who raise their voices against the danger to our health
and our human rights to safety have been the subject of harassment, intimidation and attempts
to silence them.
On July 14, the FCC voted to unleash 5G in the United States, approving sweeping Spectrum
Frontiers rules to make spectrum bands above 24 GHz available for 5G. Even though serious
health risks are associated with the proliferation of cell phone technology, the attitude of the
FCC seems to be ‘full speed ahead and damn the torpedoes.’’
Read more: Action alert: 5G cellular technology will blanket planetary life with ultra-high microwave frequencies
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/5G-wireless-technology-1958.html
ponda
6th September 2016, 13:00
Here's an interesting video about 5g and possible associated dangers.
Published on Jul 26, 2016
Is there a clandestine force working behind the scenes in the United States, censoring truth about the "5G" rollout? Watch this — then decide.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMxfffqyDtc
Michelle Marie
22nd July 2018, 06:50
MUST SEE!!!
Take Back Your Power
2uMfx-FsJiE
Video demonstrating the dangers of smart meters.
Public Utility rep has a hard time convincing council that they considered the safety of the public.
Breaking into homes, abuses of power, arresting people who refused installation of smart meters-- people speaking out.
Scientists suppressed and controlled by the likes of Motorola.
The fascist corporations trampling over people's right to health, safety, and privacy.
Experts from law and science defend the truth about lawful rights and documented testing of cell destruction--for everyone, whether they report symptoms or not.
Huge activism around the globe!
Woman who stood up to the power company had her electricity turned off for 7 weeks. Went to court; power restored.
Woman whose son died of brain cancer learns a large number of students, including a professor, all died from the radiation from the cell tower so close to their classroom at a University in San Diego.
Powerful! :muscle:
Seriously inspiring!!!
**************
Recent activism in Maine...
5,000 People filing class action lawsuit -- escalation of power bills after Smart Meter installation.
Smart Meter Class Action Lawsuit in Maine for Overbilling
July 20, 2018
https://www.activistpost.com/2018/07/5000-utility-customers-maine-class-action-lawsuit-claiming-overbilled.html
MM
bluestflame
1st November 2018, 07:28
"Sometimes what you don't know CAN HURT YOU. Ignorance around this subject matter is almost guaranteed to do so. I'm still shocked with all I research, and I had NO IDEA this was going on and I'm thankful I've since learned how to stop it. Pleased to be sharing this life preserving information here... "
F9bdU_uw2Dc
this is well compiled research into the negative health effects of wifi and cell phone radiation and THEY KNEW
onawah
2nd May 2019, 15:10
The common disease-causing link between GMOs and WiFi technology, science reveals
by: Jonathan Landsman | May 2, 2019
https://www.naturalhealth365.com/gmo-foods-wifi-2962.html
(NaturalHealth365) "A shocking six out of ten American adults (more than half of the population) currently suffer from some form of chronic disease – including such potentially life-threatening illnesses as heart disease, diabetes and cancer. Many experts note that the prevalence of chronic disease has increased steadily – over the last 30 years – due to the widespread consumption of GMO foods and use of wireless technology.
Make no mistake about it: we are experiencing a national epidemic of chronic disease – throughout the Western world. Of course, agrochemical producers and the wireless industry refuse to accept any responsibility. But, it’s hard to ignore the scientific evidence.
For example, an award-winning researcher recently published a review confirming the damaging effects of WiFi. And, as you’ll soon see in this article, the dangerous link between WiFi and GMOs is undeniable.
Award-winning researcher reveals: Radiation from WiFi and cell phones is an “important threat to human health”
In a review published in July 2018 in Environmental Research, Dr. Martin L. Pall – a 2013 winner of a Global Medical Research award – showcased the connection between radiofrequency radiation and chronic disease.
According to Dr. Pall, a calcium channel in the cells opens erroneously when the body’s internal electrical environment is disrupted by wireless signals from WiFi and cell phones. This inappropriate opening can cause too much calcium to enter the cell – resulting in the production of a compound called peroxynitrite.
Peroxynitrite can also be formed when nitric oxide interacts with other free radicals. And, while nitric oxide is a beneficial natural vasodilator – that can relax arteries and lower blood pressure – under certain circumstances it can actually react with other free radicals to cause serious health problems.
Cell studies have shown that cell phone and wireless radiation can cause an increase in nitric oxide – which also leads to the overproduction of peroxynitrite.
And the fact is: peroxynitrite puts the body at risk for chronic disease.
Bottom line: constant exposure to microwave radiation – through the use of cell phones and wireless networks – sets the stage for many of the chronic diseases plaguing the nation.
Don’t ignore this little-known fact: Peroxynitrite is the “smoking gun”
Dr. Pall is not the only scientist warning of the threat from increased peroxynitrite caused by wireless and cell phone radiation.
In a scientific review published in Physiological Reviews, the authors warned that peroxynitrite could cause cell death and apoptosis (or programmed cell suicide), thereby triggering both acute and chronic disease.
The scientists maintain that the compound causes harm in a variety of ways, including altering the function of proteins, degrading membrane structure, disrupting mitochondrial function and stimulating the production of inflammatory chemicals such as interleukin.
Specifically, scientists have linked peroxynitrite with cardiac dysfunction, neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, atherosclerosis, ischemic heart disease and heart failure. If that weren’t frightening enough, peroxynitrite is also associated with stroke, inflammatory bowel disease, multiple sclerosis, asthma, periodontal disease and cancer.
New scientific review finds devastating harm linked to WiFi technology
To conduct the review, Dr. Pall and his team examined 23 controlled scientific studies (not anecdotal reports) along with 16 other reviews. And they identified a string of ”very serious” harmful effects from exposure to WiFi and other EMFs (electromagnetic fields).
These effects include oxidative stress, impact on cell DNA, calcium overload, neuropsychiatric effects and reproductive problems in males stemming from decreased testosterone. What’s really troubling was the discovery of lower sperm counts in men – within technologically-advanced countries around the world.
Researchers called the effects on male fertility, “very worrying.” The review also shed light on specific properties of harms from radiation.
The team noted that electromagnetic frequencies or fields (EMFs) affect young people disproportionately – and that pulsed EMFs are more active than non-pulsed (all wireless systems are pulsed). NaturalHealth365 has been warning the public for years about these technologies – especially the so-called ‘smart meters’ – that measure energy usage in the home.
Most devastating of all, the scientists reported that the effects may be not only “cumulative,” but “irreversible. ”
Glyphosate-soaked GMO foods only add to the harmful health effects
The use of glyphosate, the active ingredient in the weed killer Roundup, has increased almost 15-fold since Roundup Ready crops were introduced.
These GMO plants, including Roundup Ready corn and soybeans, have been engineered to withstand being doused with the toxic chemical –which has been labeled a “probable carcinogen” by the World Health Organization’ s International Agency for Research on Cancer.
Glyphosate is linked with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, with over 600 lawsuits currently alleging that Roundup causes the disease and that its manufacturer, Monsanto, failed to warn consumers of the risk.
And, finally, here’s the connection between consuming GMO foods and WiFi … according to Diane Testa, Ph.D., a senior lecturer at Western New England University, eating GMO foods causes increased exposure to glyphosate – which triggers the body to make peroxynitrite. (not good!)
Again, there are many scientists, including Dr. Pall (mentioned earlier in this article) that warn of the threat coming from the increased production of peroxynitrite – caused by exposure to wireless technology and eating GMO foods.
Dr. Testa notes that Dr. Pall has implicated glyphosate in a litany of chronic diseases, including stroke, heart attack, diabetes, cancer, asthma, arthritis, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases.
With the application in the United States of 1.8 million pounds of glyphosate since 1974 – and the increasing usage of WiFi in homes, schools, stores and hospitals – researchers warn that we should expect “massive cumulative WiFi effects in many people.”
It’s a frightening concept, but we must remember – there are steps we can take to limit our exposures and lower the risk of harm.
Be sure to avoid GMOs by buying certified organic foods and, whenever possible, choose “wired” electronic devices over wireless.
Dr. Testa points out that over half the countries in the E.U. ban GMO crops. And, in 2011 the Council of Europe passed Resolution 1815, which requires taking measures to reduce exposure to wireless devices.
No doubt, the United States should follow suit, says Dr. Testa. Hopefully, it won’t be too late.
Sources for this article include:
EMFSafetyNetwork.org http://emfsafetynetwork.org/what-do-gmos-and-wi-fi-have-in-common/
NIH.gov https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2248324/
USRightToKnow.org https://usrtk.org/pesticides/glyphosate-health-concerns/
Cara
10th November 2019, 07:06
A video from Truthstream Media on electromagnetic sensitivity:
A8-0JKFWJKE
It cites an article from the 1970s on the possible risks and dangers of electromagnetic radiation.
Nick Matkin
10th November 2019, 18:16
I think we have to get some of these fears into perspective.
How many people die directly or indirectly from road transport, alcohol or poor diet compared to EMF 'radiation'?
To confirm the harm caused by radio frequencies, surely the first place to look is at those people working for years in RF fields orders of magnitude higher than the public are ever exposed to. People like me for example! This data will not be suppressed because colleagues talk to each other. Unions make sure no one works with undue exposure, and illnesses caused by work-related issues (especially if it was to affect tens of thousands) is not something that can be overlooked.
I've worked with RF for most of my working life. I am not aware of any of my colleagues suffering any illnesses more than the general public. This is only anecdotal evidence, but it's a good place to start.
I heard a story (which I hope isn't apocryphal) about a new communications link tower being built on the edge of a housing estate. All sorts of vague maladies started being reported from the locals once someone put word around that these masts were 'dangerous'. (Usual stuff: nose bleeds, lethargy, headaches, etc.) The engineer in charge of the relatively minor project said: "F***ing hell! If it's having this effect now, just imagine the carnage when we actually turn it on!!"
No one worries about high power UHF TV transmitter radiation, or the very high power microwave radar around military and civilian airports. Why not?
Engineers and technicians working in this field have little time for those who propagate dubious data to the genuinely worried. Radio frequencies from ELF to microwaves have been around long enough for any dangers to the public to have been well documented by now.
Delight
10th November 2019, 19:19
According to Claire Edwards..."The way to stop commercial companies is to eliminate the profit base. Our need for wireless technologies supports the industry that is endangering humanity, and that means we need to eliminate wireless technology".
Very difficult at this point? How do we return to "human" supportive tech? These two in the video gave up their mobile phones.
Claire Edwards with Sir Julian Rose: 5G, politicians, paedophilia and duress
egc11420GD8
onawah
22nd January 2020, 03:33
Robert Kennedy, Jr. Assembles Legal Team to Sue FCC over Wireless Health Guidelines
JANUARY 21, 2020
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/robert-kennedy-jr-assembles-legal-team-to-sue-fcc-over-wireless-health-guidelines/
"Robert Kennedy Jr. Assembles Legal Team to Sue FCC – The team includes RFK, Jr., IRREGULATORs’ Attorney Scott W. McCollough & Dafna Tachover
Robert Kennedy, Jr., Chairman of Children’s Health Defense (CHD) has committed to be proactive on the concerns regarding excessive exposure of our children to 5G and wireless radiation. To fulfill this promise, CHD will be submitting a lawsuit on February 3rd against the FCC for its December 4, 2019 decision to decline to review its 1996 guidelines, and for its determination that the guidelines are protective of human health.
The Dec. 4 determination provides a rare opportunity to sue the FCC and expose its disregard for public health that has been causing so many injuries and deaths, including among children. We will be representing the many children who have been injured. This is the opportunity we have been waiting for; a successful lawsuit on this will be a game changer.
We need your help to raise $100,000 to fund this effort.
To have the best chances of succeeding, we have assembled an ideal team of Attorneys to lead this case! Each one brings different strengths to the case:
Robert F. Kennedy Jr., CHD’s Chairman, is a leading Environmental Attorney who has been involved with many groundbreaking lawsuits including the recent successful cases against Monsanto. He was a senior attorney for the NRDC and now leading cases for the protection of children’s health rights.
Scott W. McCollough is the Attorney who is representing the IRREGULATORS in their lawsuit against the FCC, a case that will help expose a multi-billion-dollar fraud by Telecom companies. Scott has decades of experience as a Telecommunications and Administrative Law Attorney, leading the type of lawsuits we are submitting against the FCC.
Dafna Tachover is an expert on wireless and 5G health effects and has recently been brought on board at CHD to spearhead the Stop 5G effort. Dafna brings specialized knowledge and experience for this case. She is an Attorney, and holds a MBA, and has a Telecommunications background. She has been involved in cases focusing on wireless harms including a Supreme Court case in Israel against Wi-Fi in schools, a case that led to the first limitations on Wi-Fi worldwide!
We need to raise $100,000 and we hope that you will support this rare chance to take action against the FCC. Any donation would be helpful."
onawah
22nd January 2020, 03:42
Six Italian Courts Have Ruled that Cell Phones Cause Brain Tumors
JANUARY 21, 2020
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/six-italian-courts-have-ruled-that-cell-phones-cause-brain-tumors/
"By Martine Vriens and Dafna Tachover
[Note: This article has been adapted and updated, with permission, from an earlier article published on May 29, 2019 by We Are the Evidence.]
On January 13, 2020, Turin’s Court of Appeals confirmed a 2017 decision determining that a former Telecom Italia worker’s acoustic neuroma (a benign tumor in the ear) was caused by his mobile phone use. This is the sixth time that an Italian court has affirmed a causal link between cell phone use and brain tumors, including decisions by the High Court of Italy.
The Appellate court reached its decision after a review of the evidence and after receiving the opinion of two court-appointed experts. The experts referred the court to studies indicating that individuals who speak on their phones for an average of 30 minutes a day for at least 10 years increase their risk of developing head tumors. After considering this evidence, the Appellate court in Turin stated, “There are solid elements to affirm a causal role between the exposure of the person to radiofrequencies from mobile phones and the disease that arose.”
… studies provided by the defense—which denied a causal link—were mostly industry-funded and, therefore, should be given less weight because of conflicts of interest.
Crucially, the Turin court stated that the studies provided by the defense—which denied a causal link—were mostly industry-funded and, therefore, should be given less weight because of conflicts of interest. Studies by members of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and the European Commission’s Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCHENIHR) also suffer from conflicts of interest, according to the Turin court, because these organizations likewise receive funding from industry. The World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) International EMF Project and many countries around the world have adopted the industry-funded ICNIRP’s recommendations as their safety guidelines. Thus, these statements by the court—calling out the influence of industry funding and conflicts of interest—are extremely significant.
The Turin court’s ruling affirmed the decision of the court of Ivera from 2017. Roberto Romeo, age 57, used his cell phone for three to four hours of each working day for 15 years. He was diagnosed with acoustic neuroma in 2010, and his acoustic nerve had to be removed. As reported in The Guardian, “A medical expert estimated the damage to Romeo at 23% of his bodily function, prompting the judge to make a compensation award of €500 per month to be paid by INAIL, a national insurance program covering workplace accidents.”
Earlier court decisions
Acoustic neuromas are tumors that develop on the main nerve leading from the inner ear to the brain. This nerve influences balance and hearing. Pressure from an acoustic neuroma can cause hearing loss, ringing in the ear and unsteadiness, occasionally also interfering with brain functioning. Acoustic neuroma is also known as “vestibular schwannoma” because it develops on the Schwann cells covering the nerve. Of note, the U.S. government’s $25 million National Toxicology Program cell phone study found that exposure to cell phone radiation caused schwannoma-type tumors.
Newsweek mistakenly reported the Ivrea case as the first Italian ruling linking cell phones and acoustic neuromas, but it was in fact the second. The first ruling, made by a court in Brescia on December 10, 2009 and affirmed by the High Court of Italy in 2012, granted worker’s compensation to an industrial plant’s financial manager, Mr. Marcolini, who developed a tumor after using cell and cordless phones for five to six hours a day for 12 years. Marcolini was diagnosed as having a benign tumor on the trigeminal nerve, which controls facial muscles and sensations. As in Turin, the Brescia court ignored industry-funded studies—declaring them to be biased—and instead relied on the expert opinion of Swedish professor Lennart Hardell, an oncology specialist and cancer epidemiologist with “a focused interest in environmental risk factors for cancer.”
The next (third) ruling to link cell phone use and acute nerve disease was made by a Florence court in April 2017. The Florence court ordered INAIL to compensate a salesperson who developed an acoustic neuroma after using the phone for two to three hours a day on the job for 10 years.
An occupational hazard
On January 30, 2019, an Italian court in the city of Monza ruled that exposure to cell phone radiation caused an airport employee’s acoustic neuroma brain tumor. The employee had used a cell phone for well over 10 years for his work. After being diagnosed with an acoustic neuroma in 2010, the employee was declared (in 2011) 68% disabled and permanently unfit for work. In 2014, he applied to INAIL, claiming a causal link between his workplace exposure to radiation and the acoustic neuroma and asking that his tumor be recognized as an occupational disease. The Monza court concurred that the tumor had permanently incapacitated him and ruled it to be an occupational disease. When the defense appealed the decision, Italy’s Supreme Court upheld it.
Basing their determination on the duration of exposure, the types of devices used, the type of pathology and their review of the literature, they determined the evidence to be sufficient for a causal link, even in the absence of absolutely conclusive scientific evidence.
Over a period from 1994 to 2010, the airport employee’s job had exposed him to high levels of radiofrequency and microwave radiation from a variety of antennas and high-frequency equipment, including altitude signal repeaters, weather radars, satellite antennas and airplane equipment. In addition, the performance of his job required the use of numerous radiation-emitting devices, including mobile phones, two always-on PCs and signal repeaters (GSM and DECT). Holding the phone on the left side of his head, the employee used a Siemens DECT (cordless) phone, a Nokia and later a Samsung cell phone for more than four hours a day, with phone sessions lasting up to 45 consecutive minutes. Several times, the employee and his colleagues reported the high levels of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and radiation to their employer, asking for the EMFs and radiation to be measured, but higher-ups ignored these requests.
In the Italian legal system, judges can appoint technical experts called court technical experts (CTUs). In the Monza case, the experts and technical advisers assigned to evaluate the case conducted research into acoustic neuroma and its risk factors. Basing their determination on the duration of exposure (exposure to high-frequency EMR for a considerable number of hours per day for over 10 years), the types of devices used, the type of pathology and their review of the literature, they determined the evidence to be sufficient for a causal link, even in the absence of absolutely conclusive scientific evidence. They also referenced the Brescia court’s decision and the studies cited in that decision. Their conclusion was that the development of the left auditory nerve neuroma was related to the employee’s workplace exposures and that the tumor had caused a reduction in the employee’s mental and physical health.
Thus, in case after case, Italian courts have determined that the radiofrequency and microwave radiation emitted by cell phones can cause acoustic-neuroma-type brain tumors. The importance of these decisions should not be underestimated, particularly given the courts’ recognition that when exposure to electromagnetic radiation becomes a necessary part of the job, acoustic neuromas are an occupational risk."
Nick Matkin
22nd January 2020, 20:27
This might be relevant regarding the above mentioned Swedish professor Lennart Hardell.
From the journal Science Based Medicine (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/critique-of-risk-of-brain-tumors-from-wireless-phone-use/?fbclid=IwAR0HL613NYfRx0pZFK15rZfliWRvPlC7-PvOkH9SNnCNjJGUXgpoNA1fM8Y) about Dr Hardell:
Those of you who are regular readers of SBM [Science Based Medicine] may have seen a post by David Gorski commenting on another cell phone cancer review article in which the work of Hardell was given prominence. Gorski had this to say about Hardell: “Whenever one group of researchers keeps finding a result that no other group seems able to replicate or that otherwise disagrees with what everyone else is finding, that’s a huge red flag for me. Remove those studies, and even the wisp of a hint of a shadow of the association between cell phone use and cancer found in this study disappears. I’d have a lot more confidence in this seeming association in “high quality” studies if the association didn’t depend upon a single researcher and if this researcher was not also known for being an expert witness in lawsuits against mobile phone companies.” It would appear the Hardell himself has a conflict of interest.
Things are seldom as straight-forward as they seem.
onawah
23rd January 2020, 19:08
Can you be more specific about where Hardell is mentioned? Where and in which post?
This might be relevant regarding the above mentioned Swedish professor Lennart Hardell.
From the journal Science Based Medicine (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/critique-of-risk-of-brain-tumors-from-wireless-phone-use/?fbclid=IwAR0HL613NYfRx0pZFK15rZfliWRvPlC7-PvOkH9SNnCNjJGUXgpoNA1fM8Y) about Dr Hardell:
Those of you who are regular readers of SBM [Science Based Medicine] may have seen a post by David Gorski commenting on another cell phone cancer review article in which the work of Hardell was given prominence. Gorski had this to say about Hardell: “Whenever one group of researchers keeps finding a result that no other group seems able to replicate or that otherwise disagrees with what everyone else is finding, that’s a huge red flag for me. Remove those studies, and even the wisp of a hint of a shadow of the association between cell phone use and cancer found in this study disappears. I’d have a lot more confidence in this seeming association in “high quality” studies if the association didn’t depend upon a single researcher and if this researcher was not also known for being an expert witness in lawsuits against mobile phone companies.” It would appear the Hardell himself has a conflict of interest.
Things are seldom as straight-forward as they seem.
Nick Matkin
23rd January 2020, 22:21
Can you be more specific about where Hardell is mentioned? Where and in which post?
This might be relevant regarding the above mentioned Swedish professor Lennart Hardell.
From the journal Science Based Medicine (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/critique-of-risk-of-brain-tumors-from-wireless-phone-use/?fbclid=IwAR0HL613NYfRx0pZFK15rZfliWRvPlC7-PvOkH9SNnCNjJGUXgpoNA1fM8Y) about Dr Hardell:
Those of you who are regular readers of SBM [Science Based Medicine] may have seen a post by David Gorski commenting on another cell phone cancer review article in which the work of Hardell was given prominence. Gorski had this to say about Hardell: “Whenever one group of researchers keeps finding a result that no other group seems able to replicate or that otherwise disagrees with what everyone else is finding, that’s a huge red flag for me. Remove those studies, and even the wisp of a hint of a shadow of the association between cell phone use and cancer found in this study disappears. I’d have a lot more confidence in this seeming association in “high quality” studies if the association didn’t depend upon a single researcher and if this researcher was not also known for being an expert witness in lawsuits against mobile phone companies.” It would appear the Hardell himself has a conflict of interest.
Things are seldom as straight-forward as they seem.
Click on link Science Based Medicine. (A hot link is blue on most browsers.)
Then in third para after section headed Hardell vs. Interphone.
(On some browsers just type the word you're looking for on the page. On others [ctrl] f and paste in the word you're looking for.)
onawah
23rd January 2020, 22:34
Thanks, but I was asking for the link to the post in which Hardell is mentioned.
Can you be more specific about where Hardell is mentioned? Where and in which post?
This might be relevant regarding the above mentioned Swedish professor Lennart Hardell.
From the journal Science Based Medicine (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/critique-of-risk-of-brain-tumors-from-wireless-phone-use/?fbclid=IwAR0HL613NYfRx0pZFK15rZfliWRvPlC7-PvOkH9SNnCNjJGUXgpoNA1fM8Y) about Dr Hardell:
Those of you who are regular readers of SBM [Science Based Medicine] may have seen a post by David Gorski commenting on another cell phone cancer review article in which the work of Hardell was given prominence. Gorski had this to say about Hardell: “Whenever one group of researchers keeps finding a result that no other group seems able to replicate or that otherwise disagrees with what everyone else is finding, that’s a huge red flag for me. Remove those studies, and even the wisp of a hint of a shadow of the association between cell phone use and cancer found in this study disappears. I’d have a lot more confidence in this seeming association in “high quality” studies if the association didn’t depend upon a single researcher and if this researcher was not also known for being an expert witness in lawsuits against mobile phone companies.” It would appear the Hardell himself has a conflict of interest.
Things are seldom as straight-forward as they seem.
Click on link Science Based Medicine. (A hot link is blue on most browsers.)
Then in third para after section headed Hardell vs. Interphone.
(On some browsers just type the word you're looking for on the page. On others [ctrl] f and paste in the word you're looking for.)
Nick Matkin
24th January 2020, 19:40
Thanks, but I was asking for the link to the post in which Hardell is mentioned.
Can you be more specific about where Hardell is mentioned? Where and in which post?
This might be relevant regarding the above mentioned Swedish professor Lennart Hardell.
From the journal Science Based Medicine (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/critique-of-risk-of-brain-tumors-from-wireless-phone-use/?fbclid=IwAR0HL613NYfRx0pZFK15rZfliWRvPlC7-PvOkH9SNnCNjJGUXgpoNA1fM8Y) about Dr Hardell:
Those of you who are regular readers of SBM [Science Based Medicine] may have seen a post by David Gorski commenting on another cell phone cancer review article in which the work of Hardell was given prominence. Gorski had this to say about Hardell: “Whenever one group of researchers keeps finding a result that no other group seems able to replicate or that otherwise disagrees with what everyone else is finding, that’s a huge red flag for me. Remove those studies, and even the wisp of a hint of a shadow of the association between cell phone use and cancer found in this study disappears. I’d have a lot more confidence in this seeming association in “high quality” studies if the association didn’t depend upon a single researcher and if this researcher was not also known for being an expert witness in lawsuits against mobile phone companies.” It would appear the Hardell himself has a conflict of interest.
Things are seldom as straight-forward as they seem.
Click on link Science Based Medicine. (A hot link is blue on most browsers.)
Then in third para after section headed Hardell vs. Interphone.
(On some browsers just type the word you're looking for on the page. On others [ctrl] f and paste in the word you're looking for.)
Ahh, sorry. It's in post 34 in this thread.
onawah
24th January 2020, 20:31
Given the preponderance of evidence (and not just in this case) indicating that continued exposure to high levels of emfs from reliable sources that are not industry-funded, the attacks on Hardell can most likely be traced back to the industry itself, as per usual.
Do you have a horse in this race, Nick?
Thanks, but I was asking for the link to the post in which Hardell is mentioned.
Can you be more specific about where Hardell is mentioned? Where and in which post?
This might be relevant regarding the above mentioned Swedish professor Lennart Hardell.
From the journal Science Based Medicine (https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/critique-of-risk-of-brain-tumors-from-wireless-phone-use/?fbclid=IwAR0HL613NYfRx0pZFK15rZfliWRvPlC7-PvOkH9SNnCNjJGUXgpoNA1fM8Y) about Dr Hardell:
Those of you who are regular readers of SBM [Science Based Medicine] may have seen a post by David Gorski commenting on another cell phone cancer review article in which the work of Hardell was given prominence. Gorski had this to say about Hardell: “Whenever one group of researchers keeps finding a result that no other group seems able to replicate or that otherwise disagrees with what everyone else is finding, that’s a huge red flag for me. Remove those studies, and even the wisp of a hint of a shadow of the association between cell phone use and cancer found in this study disappears. I’d have a lot more confidence in this seeming association in “high quality” studies if the association didn’t depend upon a single researcher and if this researcher was not also known for being an expert witness in lawsuits against mobile phone companies.” It would appear the Hardell himself has a conflict of interest.
Things are seldom as straight-forward as they seem.
Click on link Science Based Medicine. (A hot link is blue on most browsers.)
Then in third para after section headed Hardell vs. Interphone.
(On some browsers just type the word you're looking for on the page. On others [ctrl] f and paste in the word you're looking for.)
Ahh, sorry. It's in post 34 in this thread.
AutumnW
25th January 2020, 03:51
Here's another possible EMF protection option.I don't know if it works but it sounds promising.You can get personal protection where ever you go and a stronger protection at home.There is plenty of info at the website.
cheers
http://www.blushield.com.au/
Wow, wonder why so expensive?
Because they are preying on people? Just a guess.
Nick Matkin
29th January 2020, 21:30
Here's another possible EMF protection option.I don't know if it works but it sounds promising.You can get personal protection where ever you go and a stronger protection at home.There is plenty of info at the website.
cheers
http://www.blushield.com.au/
Wow, wonder why so expensive?
Because they are preying on people? Just a guess.
Indeed. Just snake oil exploiting people's anxiety and lack of understanding. Blueshield don't provide a technical description of how it works, there's no specification of its reduction of the EMF fields, no technical report either independent or from their own test labs. If it worked I'd expect to see a testimonial from an RF engineer or industry worker describing its effectiveness.
A fine example of the most effective placebos being the most expensive.
onawah
16th February 2020, 18:58
5G Dangers & How to Avoid Them
Your EMF Questions Answered, Part 1
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
2/16/20
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/02/16/emf-home-remediation.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20200216Z1&et_cid=DM460359&et_rid=811773040
0VRK50X00tw
"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Brian Hoyer and I answer your questions about electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation. Hoyer is a leading EMF expert and a primary consultant for my new book, “EMF*D,” which is being released today
Your bedroom is the most important part of your home in terms of needing EMF shielding. Sleeping in an EMF-free environment is crucial, as this is when your body needs to be in a parasympathetic state, detoxing, repairing and rejuvenating itself
The area in which you eat is the second priority, as your body needs to be in a parasympathetic (relaxed) state in order for your digestion to function properly
The third priority would be if you’re using a sauna for detoxification. Making sure your sauna has low or no EMF, both magnetic fields and electric fields, is an important consideration, as it will impact your ability to detox
The 600-megahertz band that’s been opened up for T-Mobile’s 5G network penetrates deeper and goes farther than any of the 5G networks
In this video, which is Part 1 of a two-part series, Brian Hoyer and I answer your questions about electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation. Brian is a leading EMF expert1 and a primary consultant for my new book, "EMF*D," which is being released today.
In the video, Brian shares his personal journey and training, which includes nutritional therapy and continued education at the Klinghardt Academy.2 As a nutritional therapist, Brian would see patients that just didn't seem to fully recuperate.
Once he began implementing EMF shielding techniques taught by Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt, they'd suddenly experience significant improvements. In some cases, they didn't even need supplements or certain medications anymore. For example, many patients struggling with leaky gut significantly improved simply by sleeping in a shielded room every single night. Brian says:
"We talk so much … [about] the ancestral way of movement and all those sorts of things. But … what's the ancestral energetic environment? Now we have all of these modern exposures to these pulsating currents and voltages of electricity in a vastly different frequency range than we've ever been exposed to in the history of mankind.
Approaching that whole gamut of energy from this more ancestral perspective, I realized it's not only what we put into our body. It's also what we put our body into — this environment — that needs to change. If we can mimic the ancestral environment, then all these dormant healing responses wake up and the body starts to heal itself …
We've come up with a priority system on where you need to shield the most to get the most bang for your buck. And then also, what to worry about and what not to worry about when it comes to your EMF exposures, and what you can do when you are exposed."
Your EMF Questions Answered
We cover a wide variety of really good questions in this interview. Due to the length of the interview, we broke the video into two parts. Part 1 (above) focuses on the first of dozens of questions.
It ended up being a rather extended discussion, as it covers several basics, such as the areas of your home that should be given the greatest priority, the six types of radiation that need to be addressed, and some of the basic remediation strategies for wireless frequencies, electric fields and artificial lighting.
Below, I've summarized some of the key points. If you prefer, you can download the free 80-page transcript to get all the details. This and much more is also detailed in my new book, "EMF*D." https://www.amazon.com/EMF-Phones-Hidden-Protect-Yourself/dp/1401958753
Three Areas of Priority When Shielding
Regardless of where your bedrooms are located, they're clearly the most important part of your home in terms of needing EMF shielding. If you can create a shielded environment there, then you're essentially replicating the ancestral environment where there's no electricity for eight hours or so every night.
This is a crucial time, as this is when your body needs to be in a parasympathetic state, detoxing, repairing and rejuvenating itself.
"In a typical scenario, in a person's bedroom, their [body] voltage could be anywhere from 500 millivolts at the lowest … up to 10,000, 15,000 millivolts on their body all night long, [so] you've got this contraction of your muscles happening," Brian says.
"Think about the way that electricity impacts the body. How do we restart a heart? We pump voltage into it. It makes your heart muscle contract … I think one of the reasons we're so magnesium deficient in our modern culture is because we've got this constant exposure to this alternating current [causing] micro-contractions all night long and all day long in our muscles.
That depletes us of magnesium, which is trying to relax our muscles. So, we've got this constant tension going on all the time. If you have that at night while you're sleeping, your body can never really get into that full parasympathetic state so that you can actually do the healing and restoration that you need ...
Your cortisol is going up, your melatonin is going down, you're not getting that restorative detoxification of the brain and your lymphatics are not detoxing optimally."
The area in which you eat is the second priority, as your body needs to be in a parasympathetic (relaxed) state in order for your digestion to function properly. An alternative strategy is to eat at your dinner table, and about an hour afterward, which is when your main digestion is taking place, go into your shielded space and relax for a while. "People who have digestive issues who do that have seen amazing results," Brian says.
The third priority would be if you're using a sauna for detoxification. Making sure your sauna has low or no EMF is an important consideration, as it will impact your ability to detox. Working with Sauna Space, Brian has helped develop a shielded near-infrared sauna.
"It's a drastic reduction in the wireless frequencies that you're exposed to. It's basically like having a portable shielded room," Brian says. "That allows your body to get into a deeper parasympathetic response, deeper detox, and we've seen some amazing results in people who are electro-sensitive using these saunas …
For my standards, I want the body to be in a parasympathetic state when you're in your sauna, so we're looking at [an EMF reading of] 0.3 milligauss or less in the sauna. That's the goal."Remedial Strategies for 6 Types of EMF Stress
Brian tests homes for six primary stressors:
Wireless frequencies — "Anything from the FM radio station up through about 900 megahertz resonates with the human body and the skin, and the conductivity that's on the skin," Brian says, pointing out that while many are worried about the millimeter wave part of 5G, he's far more concerned about the 600-megahertz band that's been opened up for T-Mobile's 5G network.
It penetrates deeper and goes farther than any of the 5G networks. Most cellphone companies have been using 900 to 2000 megahertz, so T-Mobile's network is a much lower frequency, which allows it to cover a greater area.
"A lot of the assessment is hunting down Wi-Fi sources and telling people how to minimize them. Like don't leave your printer plugged in and turned on, because it's always emitting Wi-Fi and you only use your printer, what, once a week? And then Apple TVs, smart TVs — even remotes for the Roku. Sometimes they'll have Wi-Fi built into them that are constantly emitting," Brian says.
Electric fields from voltage, wiring in the walls, and appliances and devices plugged into your light sockets.
Most commercial buildings, condos and hotels are not an issue, as building codes require the electrical wiring to be in a metal conduit, which essentially eliminates the electric fields behind the walls. Few residential homes have that, however, as it's not part of code in most areas.
If you're building your home, you can install shielded wiring from the start, although it does cost more. If your wiring is not shielded, the solution would be to turn off the electricity, although that still might not solve the problem. In my own home, there was an electric current running through the floor as well, which remained when I turned off the electricity to my bedroom.
"Ultimately, in my experience, everybody needs the RF shielding and wireless protection," Brian says, "Our solution for that is to have a canopy over the bed that's a conductive fabric that you can ground, so that the electric fields can't get in, and something on the floor as well.
The ultimate solution is to paint the bedroom with shielding paint [that's] grounded as well, so even if the power is on — provided you have nothing plugged into the wall — you are not getting electric fields coming in. And then we have to do the floor as well."
Magnetic fields occurring from wiring errors, motors, power lines and transformers outside the home, as well as metal pipes with current, usually when you are on a municipal water supply
Dirty electricity
Geopathic stress that comes up from the earth
Artificial lighting (color spectrum and flicker rates). The best types of light bulbs are incandescent bulbs with higher wattage, as they have the most natural color spectrum and lowest flicker rates.
Brian recommends using 100 watt or 150 watt incandescent bulbs whenever possible. But one needs to be careful as they create loads of heat, and many fixtures will not accommodate them. Brian also recommends the 250-watt near-infrared light bulb from Sauna Space, called Photon.3 It's $350 and can be used in your sauna, as a heat lamp and to improve the quality of your indoor lighting.
The testing and assessment Brian's company, Shielded Healing, offers takes about four hours, and starts at around $1,000 for a studio apartment. For larger homes, tack on $100 per bedroom and per 1,000 square feet. The fee includes a free retest, to make sure all of your remediation strategies are in fact working.
The cost for remediation can vary widely, depending on what you need and whom you hire to do the job. For a typical 12 by 12-foot room, you can expect to pay about $1,000 to $1,500 for shielding materials, depending on how many windows you have, as shielding windows tends to be costly.
While it's certainly a worthwhile investment that will pay dividends in terms of health, the cost may be too high for many. They still need a solution though. With Brian's help, my team has created an EMF-shielded sleeping tent, which will be among the most effective yet least expensive approaches available. We hope to have it available before the summer. After three years of development, the final prototype was recently finished.
There's No Getting Around the Need to Measure Your Exposures
When looking to buy or rent a home, key areas to avoid would be near a cellphone tower or powerline. Higher elevations like hilltops are also typically higher EMF areas, while rural areas tend to have lower saturation (provided you're not near a cellphone tower).
That said, you cannot identify low-EMF areas simply by looking at the location anymore. Regardless of where you live, you're likely to have one or more of the EMF stressors reviewed above, and will need to remediate them. In the end, the only way to tell if EMF is a problem in any given location is to measure it.
"We don't know until we turn on the meters and can measure it," Brian says. "What I tell people is, yeah, generally speaking, the higher [elevation] you get, the more exposed you will be, but usually you're going to have to shield anyway.
If you can take an FM radio and get a radio station, you're being exposed to radio frequency radiation. And even people out in the middle of nowhere, like a national forest, a lot of times they'll still have radio-frequency exposure.
It's not natural. It's not something our ancestors were exposed to and it's something that you need out of your life at least while you're sleeping. Go through that priority system we've talked about ... Mitigate where you can and do some biological inputs using the solutions that we talk about …
You also have to test the ground current that's going into the ground and the dirty electricity, and if there are wiring errors. You need a really good screening tool in order to pick the right property. Also, rule out a massive exposure that's going to be more difficult to shield. We have come across that in some of the inner-city areas where it's really high …"
In an article on his blog, he adds:4
"It's important to understand that the PULSATION isn't natural. We don't receive modulated digital radio frequencies in nature. We get analog signals and they are MUCH weaker. The strongest radio signals we receive from natural sources from the cosmos are about a ONE HUNDRED BILLIONTH OF A WATT.
That means 1 microwatt of RF energy is about 1 million times stronger than the strongest RF pulse we would have received ancestrally."
Everyone Needs EMF Shielding
A key take-home message here is that virtually everyone needs to consider doing EMF remediation these days. Everyone needs an EMF-free space, at least during sleep, in order to prevent accelerated aging and everything that goes with it.
Remember, your body rejuvenates and detoxes during sleep, but if your body is bombarded with EMFs all night long, it won't be able to effectively perform those crucial cleanout and regenerative functions. To learn more, be sure to download the transcript of this discussion. We cover questions like:
What meter do you need to measure the six EMF stressors and what are the ideal, healthy levels?
How can you protect yourself from your neighbor's Wi-Fi?
What's the greatest, most harmful source of EMF exposure?
Why is it that partial shielding can make the situation worse rather than better?
What produces most of the dirty electricity in your home and what's the most effective way to filter it?
Are AirPods, wireless battery-operated headsets and hearing aids safe to wear all day?
How can you protect yourself from the EMF in your car?
Do EMF-shielding clothing actually work?
Which supplements can help ward off the negative effects of EMF, and how do they work?
Can you watch TV without Wi-Fi?
Will a satellite Wi-Fi dish expose you to harmful EMF?
Could 5G worsen autoimmune diseases or chronic infections such as Lyme disease?
What are the two most common EMF exposures in most homes, and how do you remediate them?
For the answers to these and many other questions, be sure to watch Part 1 and Part 2 of this interview, or download the 55-page transcript."
onawah
6th March 2020, 23:26
EMFs and Bacteria
Study results at:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6943849/
"The increasing use of telecommunication devices such as Wi-Fi modems and mobile phones in the recent years can change the cellular structure of microorganisms so the generation of electromagnetic waves has led to concern in the community whenever be exposed to these fields and may have harmful effects on human health.
Material and Methods:
In this experimental study, standard strains of bacteria were prepared on Mueller-Hinton agar for bacterial growth to obtain 0.5 McFarland turbidity (1.5 × 108 CFU) of bacteria. Antibiotic susceptibility test using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was done. For Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, antibiotics susceptibility test was conducted. The test group was exposed to electromagnetic waves emitted by mobile phone." More at the link.
Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa became more resistant to antibiotics upon being exposed to 900 MHz (cell phone radiation).
Every microbe responds to specific frequencies that can either enhance virulence, cause dormancy or destroy it.
Hospitals are a breeding ground for disease and it's one reason why practitioners routinely prescribe multiple rounds of antibiotics.
But they are fighting a war they cannot win because they are not utilizing nature's most effective antimicrobials, including that bright yellow orb in the sky.
Mari
7th March 2020, 19:02
EMFs and Bacteria
Study results at:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6943849/
"The increasing use of telecommunication devices such as Wi-Fi modems and mobile phones in the recent years can change the cellular structure of microorganisms so the generation of electromagnetic waves has led to concern in the community whenever be exposed to these fields and may have harmful effects on human health.
Material and Methods:
In this experimental study, standard strains of bacteria were prepared on Mueller-Hinton agar for bacterial growth to obtain 0.5 McFarland turbidity (1.5 × 108 CFU) of bacteria. Antibiotic susceptibility test using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method was done. For Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, antibiotics susceptibility test was conducted. The test group was exposed to electromagnetic waves emitted by mobile phone." More at the link.
Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa became more resistant to antibiotics upon being exposed to 900 MHz (cell phone radiation).
Every microbe responds to specific frequencies that can either enhance virulence, cause dormancy or destroy it.
Hospitals are a breeding ground for disease and it's one reason why practitioners routinely prescribe multiple rounds of antibiotics.
But they are fighting a war they cannot win because they are not utilizing nature's most effective antimicrobials, including that bright yellow orb in the sky.
Yes, I've self-medicated more times than I can remember using that 'bright yellow orb in the sky. Even in the clutches of flu, I've hauled myself out in the garden and sunbathed (when the orb deigns to appear, that is!) Great for depression too. I haven't used sunscreen for years, as it acts as a barrier between the beneficial rays & your skin. Its no coincidence (to me, anyway) that there's been a huge rise of skin cancer since sunscreen began to be so widely used. I have never believed the Great Orb was responsible for this & I have a feeling that the chemicals in the sunscreen may just be contributing to these cases. Just my take.
Marti
8th March 2020, 15:03
Hi, new member here. Enjoyed all the posts. I felt the shielding methods were VERY expensive.
I ignorantly let my power company install a smart meter last year. The good news is that the meter is on the downstairs part of our home and the room on the other side is an unheated storeroom. I have read that high EMF is blocked from coming out the back by the meter box itself and that the danger is the exposed glass part that sticks out the front. Anyone here know whether this is correct?
I found this device https://smile.amazon.com/Smart-Meter-Guard-Radiation-Shield/dp/B00OVJCPS6/
Opinions?
I currently have a large piece of black tourmaline sitting on the meter. I certainly prefer natural (and less expensive) solutions like this.
Mari
8th March 2020, 21:42
Hi, new member here. Enjoyed all the posts. I felt the shielding methods were VERY expensive.
I ignorantly let my power company install a smart meter last year. The good news is that the meter is on the downstairs part of our home and the room on the other side is an unheated storeroom. I have read that high EMF is blocked from coming out the back by the meter box itself and that the danger is the exposed glass part that sticks out the front. Anyone here know whether this is correct?
I found this device https://smile.amazon.com/Smart-Meter-Guard-Radiation-Shield/dp/B00OVJCPS6/
Opinions?
I currently have a large piece of black tourmaline sitting on the meter. I certainly prefer natural (and less expensive) solutions like this.
Lepidolite is a good shield too. I have a large amethyst cluster sitting comfortably next to our modem in our living room. There's no way a Smart meter is getting across my threshold.
onawah
15th March 2020, 05:23
Dr. Mercola: How to avoid being EMF*D
Mar 14, 2020
Josh del Sol
"Dr. Joseph Mercola has compiled a standard-setting new book on EMF, and I believe it will help save lives.
lllkB_wvC4o
"Dr. Joseph Mercola’s is one of the world’s pioneering authorities on alternative health. Mercola’s new book, EMF*D, is perhaps the best compilation of research on the subject of the biological health effects from artificial electromagnetic fields (EMF) and wireless radiation."
https://www.takebackyourpower.net/dr-mercola-how-to-avoid-being-emfd/
"EMF*D is quite simply a powerful resource for you to reach others with the truth about EMF health effects, and we recommend it as a suitable resource for seasoned researchers and skeptics alike.
In this first-of-its kind guide, Mercola reveals:
What EMFs actually are, where you find them in your daily life, and how they affect you
How the rise of childhood cancers and leukemia have a direct relationship to EMFs (too much exposure to iPads, Wi-Fi, and TV is damaging development and increasing diseases)
Why you’ve been largely kept in the dark about this threat to your health
How you can actually repair the damage done by EMFs at a cellular level
Practical strategies to protect yourself and your loved ones from EMFs at home, at work and out in the world
The impressive list of contributors to EMF*D include the following experts:
Brian Hoyer (ShieldedHealing.com)
Martha Herbert, PhD (Harvard Medical School)
Stephanie Seneff, PhD (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Sharon Goldberg, MD (University of New Mexico School of Medicine)
Magda Havas, PhD (Trent University)
James Clement (Supercentenarian Research Study)
Peter Sullivan (Clear Light Ventures)
Nicolas Pineault (Author, The Non-Tinfoil Guide to EMFs)
Oram Miller, BBEC, EMRS
Alasdair Phillips (Powerwatch UK)
Lloyd Burrell (ElectricSense.com)
Arthur Firstenberg, MD (author, The Invisible Rainbow)
Alex Tarnava, researcher "
Patient
15th March 2020, 06:53
Hi, new member here. Enjoyed all the posts. I felt the shielding methods were VERY expensive.
I ignorantly let my power company install a smart meter last year. The good news is that the meter is on the downstairs part of our home and the room on the other side is an unheated storeroom. I have read that high EMF is blocked from coming out the back by the meter box itself and that the danger is the exposed glass part that sticks out the front. Anyone here know whether this is correct?
I found this device https://smile.amazon.com/Smart-Meter-Guard-Radiation-Shield/dp/B00OVJCPS6/
Opinions?
I currently have a large piece of black tourmaline sitting on the meter. I certainly prefer natural (and less expensive) solutions like this.
I am asking you this question because you have "cats" as your avatar...
Do you have cats?
Have they acted strangely out of character lately? IF so, can you describe it for me?
Marti
15th March 2020, 12:39
Yes, we have two cats - sisters. We haven't noticed any particularly strange behavior. I presume you have?
Nick Matkin
16th March 2020, 20:35
It's understandable why people unfamiliar with the science want to protect themselves and their families from unwanted radio signals. So if you're worried about RF from smart meters or any other device, an earthed metal screen is the only protection. Crystals, Organite, precious or semi-presious stones do nothing. You need a BARRIER! Ignore all the websites promoting pseudo science exploiting people's anxiety.
If these woo gimmicks worked, they'd be used in industry where workers' protection is required. I spent most of my working life close up to RF signals in the range 100 kHz to 20 GHz in field strengths at least one order of magnitude more intense than the public get exposed to. But guess what? In the real world shielding is used. Woven wires into fabric, wire mesh, thin sheet aluminium, conductive paint, etc. No blobs of zob****e hanging all over the place!
onawah
5th June 2020, 16:19
InPower Episode #1: A Mass Action of Liability (2017)
4,822 views•May 19, 2020
InPower
741 subscribers
(This movement is designed to educate and give people a voice and the ability to refuse smart meters, vaccinations and 5G.)
"InPower is a worldwide movement that aims to secure life, liberty, and property through accountability.
Episode #1 focuses on solving the "smart" meter (trespassing technology) problem. Our commercial administrative process, called the Notice of Liability, can be used by anyone to reclaim one's authority.
For more information about this and other causes, please visit www.inpowermovement.com.
The subtitles for this video are available in a growing number of languages. To access the subtitles, click the “CC” (closed caption) button at the bottom right side of the video, and then select the desired language."
Y7-p63o3zfQ
**********
There is an InPower website: https://www.inpowermovement.com/
and a Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/inpowermovement/?__tn__=kC-R1.g&eid=ARBVvQf7bIIqqh22oG0lVHesV9aZWgWtnITQNjNndBvMiUVvIfMOwBRx2Ddi28gqX5L9faGQJo3j9Y0P&hc_ref=ARTz8Nkt9-nns2I7hczAYvpfCmsEo0PR7I_gkcLGyi24t25Z8IRi58ruoI3I4mOTdFo&fref=nf&__xts__[0]=68.ARBCT2o1Z4OhkEhR4gYaVBN6Qk16wLtHIGpLBIWhpEfyeReBcbRh3was7x5ycpUOcxOZGXLnpT_3SFGp2WsNoWMbwllZqoRn f-QOB1dWUshcBsFHBfNOMErj7CRM86_dUI4RvfEOwhJnuZpZ4B5Efbn1w-xSj25F7gqyJSiNj9se0HJW96t8I5jDhnszBH-sACgHCG11VhsD8oGammEo2ZFMn4CuUSjFyRw-t2fmlHKV5Ht2YTwPi5fxWWaOBwEAvLr99jKPxGbfsZ33mXRbCrDKMsoI_-vJT7BZ2OJ5z_FBWCPfkqIFGcFSaaGMek-9ycJt6Z8
onawah
20th June 2020, 18:51
EMF Health Summit Free to watch 6/27-7/3
Online Free from June 27 to 3rd July
Register here: emfhealthsummit.com
(From Lloyd Burrell's email update https://www.electricsense.com/ )
Over 4 million people can't be wrong
Lloyd Burrell | EMF Health Summit via aweber.com
6/20/20
"In 2009 for the princely sum of $50 ElectricSense was born.
My first utterings were a YouTube video—filmed in my living room.
I was thinking, if just one person sees this and gets the message, it will have been worth it.
Fortunately, quite a few people saw it.
Since then over 4 million people have visited ElectricSense.
Probably quite a few more than that, my stats only go back to 2013.
In that first video, I was just blowing off steam.
I was a bit cheesed off (I’m being polite) not just because I’d been harmed by these supposedly safe technologies but because nobody seemed to know a darned thing about any of these dangers.
The medical community was, and still is by and large, clueless.
But more to the point everyone was walking around ignorant, business as usual, complaining about the poor reception on their cell phone, buying cell phones for their kids, etc.
Since then my mission has gone from, not only raising awareness about the dangers, but sharing solutions.
And it’s just grown and grown over time, thanks to you.
But despite all my efforts (and the valiant efforts of many others), a lot of people are still buying cell phones as if they're going out of fashion, buying them for their kids AND complaining like spoilt children when they can't get enough bars to stream the latest blockbuster on Netflix.
Which got me thinking, what can I do to take this to the next level?
What can I do to really get the message out to a broader audience?
EMFs need to go mainstream—that’s where the idea of holding an EMF Health Summit bubbled up.
I’d like to say that I sat and meditated for a solution and that’s how it came to me.
But it didn’t quite work like that.
I’d been kind thinking it over for about 2 years!
But I guess I felt that, to quote one of my favorite Elvis Presley songs, ‘It’s Now or Never’.
To pull it off I knew that I needed the support of 30 or so world-leading experts on EMFs.
I also knew that I needed the support of some major websites in the natural health space to help me get the message out.
How to convince them to help me?
I decided to dive in at the deep end.
I emailed Dr. Mercola, told him my bold plan, and asked if he would participate.
I figured if I can get the man behind the number one most visited natural health website on the planet on my side, who by the way is passionate about EMFs, then I would be off to a good start.
He said yes!
https://ci3.googleusercontent.com/proxy/PaoHRINREYscn-l7ge4KfLZfK9iyL_Eqp1K50jywShIKKIemp7KGzskgTMnEeT5iiaUXpATCLEYMunOfzfaA7YHqLB9B-DfAejmfTfKNuTFrjAZKKw=s0-d-e1-ft#https://www.electricsense.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/0nhjv.png
And the EMF Health Summit just snowballed from there.
I've been able to connect with 34 world-class experts on everything EMF... cell phone radiation, 5G, WiFi, smart meters, dirty electricity, Bluetooth, you name it.
Each of them shares their best strategies to protect yourself from these digital toxins, which are causing chronic inflammation and so many other conditions and diseases. Including cancer.
And do you know the best part?
It’s FREE.
All 35 interviews (34 guests but 35 interviews) are free to watch between 27th June and 3rd July.
Register here: emfhealthsummit.com
Note: If you registered for last year's broadcast - this is the same event. I know how tough it can be to find the time to access all these amazing interviews that's why I'm sending you this email so you get another opportunity to take part in one of the biggest FREE EMF Health Summits ever...
Lloyd Burrell
ElectricSense
Live a naturally healthy life in our electromagnetic world!
P.S. Having trouble accessing our page? Copy/paste this link into your browser https://emfhealthsummit.com/go-2-h2-a/
Free to watch between 27th June and 3rd July.
Register here: emfhealthsummit.com
Support my work: visit my EMF protection store http://www.electricsense.com/ "
onawah
24th July 2020, 21:52
Russia Considers Ban on Smart Phones and Wi-Fi in Schools to Protect Children’s Brains
JULY 23, 2020
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/other/russia-considers-ban-on-smart-phones-and-wi-fi-in-schools-to-protect-childrens-brains/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=b0614aa6-8672-46c7-861a-a9d0b8b08316
By Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Chairman, Children’s Health Defense
"On July 17th, Russia’s Health Ministry announced it may soon ban all use of Wi-Fi and cell phones in elementary schools. Russia already limits emissions of nonionizing radiation to 1000x less than we allow in the USA. Numerous studies show profound injuries from Wi-fi including oxidative stress, sperm/testicular damage, neuropsychiatric effects including EEG changes, apoptosis (cell death), cellular DNA damage, endocrine changes, and calcium overload. Leading scientists and medical associations have called to ban the use of Wi-Fi in schools by switching to wired networks.
In 2013, Israel banned Wi-Fi in kindergartens and limited its use in elementary schools. Israeli schools allow Wi-Fi for three hours per week in the first and second grades and six hours per week for third graders. In 2017, Cypress banned Wi-Fi in Kindergartens and elementary schools.
Russia has published safety recommendations encouraging children to use wired connection rather than Wi-Fi during the COVID lockdown. Children’s Health Defense has published a “step by step” guide on how to hardwire wireless devices for safe remote learning. The Chairman for the Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection, Professor Oleg Grigoriev, has criticized corruption in the international regulatory agencies. FCC’s health guidelines rely on the obsolete, laughable assumption that the non-ionizing radiation wireless technologies are harmful only if they cause thermal change in tissue. That assumption is proven false in thousands of studies, even before cell phones were commercialized in the 1980s. Contrary to the FCC’s position, in the 1970s, the Russians had already acknowledged that the radiation emitted from radio and microwave frequencies based technologies can be harmful at levels that are at least 1,000 times lower than the levels that create thermal effects.
Despite massive evidence of harm, in December 2019, crooked FCC officials declared that there is no evidence of harm from wireless technology and declined to review its health guidelines. In February 2020, Children’s Health Defense sued the FCC to reverse this decision. We will file the main brief in our case on July 29, 2020.
Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. CHD is implementing many strategies, including legal, in an effort to defend the health of our children and obtain justice for those already injured. Your support is essential to CHD’s successful mission."
onawah
6th November 2020, 22:45
New paper on CFS symptoms and the role of power frequency and radio frequency exposures
30 OCT 20
https://www.emfacts.com/2020/10/new-paper-on-cfs-symptoms-and-the-role-of-power-frequency-and-radio-frequency-exposures/
"CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME (CFS) AND SLEEP DISORDERS: EVIDENCE THAT EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELDS AND RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS ARE FACTORS TO INVESTIGATE IN TREATMENT
ACNEM Journal Vol 39 No1 – April 2020
By Don Maisch PhD
Excerpt:
Overview
A 2019 report to the Australian NHMRC found that 66% of research on Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), also referred to as Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) was on managing the condition, 17% was on finding the cause for the condition, 10% on prevention and 7% on multiple areas. Besides a number of recommendations, the committee recommended “building research quantity and capacity, improving health services research and developing health advice.” (1)
It is estimated that 50 -70 million Americans chronically suffer from a sleep and wakefulness disorder which hinders their daily functioning and adversely affects health and longevity (2). In Australia, a 2016 sleep health survey found that inadequate sleep affects 33-45% of adults, across all age groups.(3)
As one of the symptoms of CFS is insomnia and other sleep disorders, any common factor in these conditions should be of research interest. Australia is in an excellent position for such research. For example, the National Centre for Neuroimmunology and Emerging Diseases, based at Griffith University, Qld. and part of the Menzies Health Institute Queensland, has a research focus on the causes and mechanisms of ME/CFS, identifying biomarkers of the condition and improving patient outcomes in the area of preventative medicine, social and clinical care and public health. (4)
According to a literature review by Henry Lai, bioengineering Professor Emeritus at the University of Washington and Editor-in-chief of Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, the biological effects of extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields (which range from 0 – 300 Hz) (5) and radiofrequency electromagnetic fields ( RF-EMF) (from 30 kHz to 300 GHz) (6) are very similar, with both including sleep problems (7). Lai concludes that there is a basic mechanism of interaction between biological tissues and artificial electromagnetic fields that is independent of frequency (8). This finding brings into question the assurances of safety claimed by various national and international exposure standards….SNIP "
Read the full paper here https://www.emfacts.com/2020/10/new-paper-on-cfs-symptoms-and-the-role-of-power-frequency-and-radio-frequency-exposures/
TargeT
7th November 2020, 01:12
New paper on CFS symptoms and the role of power frequency and radio frequency exposures
30 OCT 20
https://www.emfacts.com/2020/10/new-paper-on-cfs-symptoms-and-the-role-of-power-frequency-and-radio-frequency-exposures/
"CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME (CFS) AND SLEEP DISORDERS: EVIDENCE THAT EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELDS AND RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS ARE FACTORS TO INVESTIGATE IN TREATMENT
Just an FYI.. ELF (extremely low frequency) is like the complete opposite of 5g, which is extremely high frequency (10's or 100's of hz for ELF vrs 4000 - 10000's hz for 5g).
onawah
7th November 2020, 01:29
This might be a better fit: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?89026-Wi-Fi-Smart-Meters---Wireless-Wake-Up-Call---health-dangers-of-Electromagnetic-Fields&highlight=electromagnetic+frequencies%26quot%3B%26quot%3B
I will request a move by the Mods.
EMFs and 5G dangers are related, but the focus on how frequencies affect us has narrowed down a lot to 5G; still, it is better to keep the issues separate for accuracy's sake, even though this new report will likely get less attention on the thread about EMFs in general.
New paper on CFS symptoms and the role of power frequency and radio frequency exposures
30 OCT 20
https://www.emfacts.com/2020/10/new-paper-on-cfs-symptoms-and-the-role-of-power-frequency-and-radio-frequency-exposures/
"CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME (CFS) AND SLEEP DISORDERS: EVIDENCE THAT EXTREMELY LOW FREQUENCY MAGNETIC FIELDS AND RADIOFREQUENCY ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS ARE FACTORS TO INVESTIGATE IN TREATMENT
Just an FYI.. ELF (extremely low frequency) is like the complete opposite of 5g, which is extremely high frequency (10's or 100's of hz for ELF vrs 4000 - 10000's hz for 5g).
Sue (Ayt)
30th November 2020, 20:01
So, I just got the notice that our area is installing smart meters on all homes, and to expect the installer in the next month or so.
I had thought we had lucked out, living in a rural area.
:(
Reading the notice carefully, it goes over all the concerns, attempting to alleviate them, but in my opinion they did not do a very good job at all!
I was astounded to read that they do indeed offer an "opt out" option, but it is quite costly. We are offered a one-time fee of 63.50 to opt out, plus a monthly fee of 21.50 added to our electric bill. The majority of folks around here just cannot afford this, living mostly on social security.
It feels almost like our area, with many elderly, is being targeted.
EFO
30th November 2020, 22:33
So, I just got the notice that our area is installing smart meters on all homes, and to expect the installer in the next month or so.
I had thought we had lucked out, living in a rural area.
:(
Reading the notice carefully, it goes over all the concerns, attempting to alleviate them, but in my opinion they did not do a very good job at all!
I was astounded to read that they do indeed offer an "opt out" option, but it is quite costly. We are offered a one-time fee of 63.50 to opt out, plus a monthly fee of 21.50 added to our electric bill. The majority of folks around here just cannot afford this, living mostly on social security.
It feels almost like our area, with many elderly, is being targeted.
Don't be sad,there are very effective solutions against smart meters negative effect. :)
Trisher
1st December 2020, 12:05
Smart meters affect the entire electricity supply in the house. They radiate out a few feet into each room. They come through all appliances like lights and computers. There are now expensive gadgets that can be installed on the electricity incoming box that take these specific frequencies down. One I know of is called "The Sine Tamer".
Here is a link
https://poweremt.com/
EFO
1st December 2020, 12:51
Smart meters affect the entire electricity supply in the house. They radiate out a few feet into each room. They come through all appliances like lights and computers. There are now expensive gadgets that can be installed on the electricity incoming box that take these specific frequencies down. One I know of is called "The Sine Tamer".
Here is a link
https://poweremt.com/
With 1189 USD I can equip an entire small community with copper tensor rings,not only one home and the non positive energy will be transmuted into positive/beneficial energy. :) The story is much longer how this process is made but it worth it.
But since less people listen,it's no more my problem,but it's very sad from me of how people are affected by electricity and electronics.I am here for those who need assistance.
Tensor Rings reduce harmful EMF's from Refrigerator
(1:54 min.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9v-2J0N7e-E
The "Whole House" Effect of Placing a Tensor Ring on the Electric Meter (https://tensorring.com/)
(4:56 min.)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_LwCLQBhj0[/video
EMF Protection Comparison Q-Link and Safespace Vs Sizes of Tensor Rings https://tensorring.com
(7:02 min.)
[video=youtube;BHWpwENbmdc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHWpwENbmdc
Energy Landscaping with Judy Gabriel
(6:48 min.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeqvP8mvssc
These demonstrations are only a small part of how versatile these tensor rings are.It's your choice...
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.