Alex is doing the elite a big favor

[WhiteLove]

Lately Alex has decided to campaign for Trump, but this pro Trump talk is starting to get really extreme. I think that Alex might have good intensions, but that he is currently in the hands of the elite, maybe even without knowing so.

Of course both Alex and Trump have good qualities, but it's important to use your ears and hear what's coming out of their mouths right now to understand their current position. Not so long ago Trump talked like this on Alex Jones' show:

- I am the most militaristic guy, if I win I will build a military so strong bla, bla...
- When you go to war, you need to do so properly

FJqLAleEnKw

To this, Alex nodded and now he is drumming on the Trump drum like crazy:

Qt6UunbXnww

Trump, can in a more peaceful minded version, do great things I'm sure. The question is can he go from this war minded version, to the peaceful minded version until the election. I don't have the answer, but I hope some higher intelligence will make this guy more peaceful before the election, else prepare for a very bumpy ride if he gets elected.

[Matt P]

I don't have the answer either but I do know if Trump wins it won't be because he was elected. There is no such thing. Voting on easily hacked computer machines is an illusion. If Trump becomes the next CEO of the corporation of the united states it will be because the board of directors wanted him to.

Matt

[Andre]

I agree with Matt except that I think there is a strong possibility that Trump is a decoy to get Hillary elected. It is almost a given that Trump will become the Republican nominee and will be up against Hillary. So, would it not make sense for the U.S. branch of the "World Management Team" to engineer the elections so that the choice gets down to a crazed billionaire or Hillary? In that way, they are banking on Hillary winning the Presidential race. Thoughts anyone?

As for Alex Jones supporting Trump, it makes those who are already suspicious of him even more suspicious. It makes no sense for a truth seeker to support a megalomaniac billionaire.

[Tyy1907]

And Hillary using the Disclosure ploy to try and fool us all. Who does she think she's kidding! Laughable

[christian]

Cruz is a Bush-puppet, it seems. And Rubio is now backed by most of the Republican establishment, which in turn seems to hate Trump's guts. (Neocons declare war on Trump, prefer Hillary instead. (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/trump-clinton-neoconservatives-220151#ixzz41n333mG2))

On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders doesn't have a chance against Hillary, cause she's got all the dirty tricks on her side. Hillary will get the nomination.

If it's Hillary vs Rubio or Cruz, there would be only establishment candidates.

Trump is the only one (except for Sanders) who is radically antagonized by the establishment. When I look at Trump's statements and proposed policies, some are somewhat sensible, others are downright terrible. When it comes to the question of whether or not he would deliver on his promises, I wouldn't trust him one bit. With Hillary, I'd be very confident that she'd push the NWO agenda as hard as she possibly can. That's why I'd prefer Trump over Hillary. Strange times, huh?!

Purportedly, Trump wants to release the 28 classified pages on 911, and he wants to audit the Fed. Then again, he wants to change libel laws so he can sue the living daylights out of anybody who verbally abuses him, it seems.

Oh dear!

The important bottom line here is, in my opinion, we can't just rely on electing this or that person. I think that encouraging people to build up the greatest they have within themselves and supporting them in becoming that is where it's at. There is no savior but the greatness within us. If we, the people, don't focus on freedom and maturity, our politics will never be.

[Morbid]

i hope these elections would finally expose this whole fiasco for what it really is..

[Tyy1907]

Cruz is a Bush-puppet, it seems. And Rubio is now backed by most of the Republican establishment, which in turn seems to hate Trump's guts. (Neocons declare war on Trump, prefer Hillary instead. (http://www.politico.com/story/2016/03/trump-clinton-neoconservatives-220151#ixzz41n333mG2))

On the Democratic side, Bernie Sanders doesn't have a chance against Hillary, cause she's got all the dirty tricks on her side. Hillary will get the nomination.

If it's Hillary vs Rubio or Cruz, there would be only establishment candidates.

Trump is the only one (except for Sanders) who is radically antagonized by the establishment. When I look at Trump's statements and proposed policies, some are somewhat sensible, others are downright terrible. When it comes to the question of whether or not he would deliver on his promises, I wouldn't trust him one bit. With Hillary, I'd be very confident that she'd push the NWO agenda as hard as she possibly can. That's why I'd prefer Trump over Hillary. Strange times, huh?!

Purportedly, Trump wants to release the 28 classified pages on 911, and he wants to audit the Fed. Then again, he wants to change libel laws so he can sue the living daylights out of anybody who verbally abuses him, it seems.

Oh dear!

The important bottom line here is, in my opinion, we can't just rely on electing this or that person. I think that encouraging people to build up the greatest they have within themselves and supporting them in becoming that is where it's at. There is no savior but the greatness within us. If we, the people, don't focus on freedom and maturity, our politics will never be.

Well said man

[amor]

Whether it is Trump or Cruz, they would do well by the world to adopt Karen Hudes and her ideas and knowledge about Gold to the People to whom it belongs so that we could have some representation of our labor using a Gold Strip in our Paper Money. Each country should have its own currency nevertheless. If ONLY the banks hold your credits in their computers (the money then belongs to them) and you have no currency of exchange, you are a chicken in the coup awaiting execution.

[East Sun]

Why does Alex Jones call all the male candidates by their last name and H. Clinton by her first name?
and does he think that any kind of promotion is going to be positive no matter what it is?

He claims to be a Trump man, but is he really?
I think he's a Jones man all the way---as he should be.............

[Jayren]

I was skeptical about Alex Jones a lomg time ago i unsubscribe from his Youtube channel. Being me I am a very spiritual person, and he wasn't dishing out any spiritual information claining to be something but acting like something else... He seems like hes putting on an act and I picked that up quickly I identified it myself. The way he puts out information and discloses it is not right at all, it is very fishy. And as far as Trump. Billions of dollars and what does he decide to do? Run for President. . why I don't even know it's not like he wants to help us. You don't have to run for president to help people, being a billionaire he could make worldwide changes with his investments and influence around the world and he decides to be a puppet...


All canidates are likely to fail.

[NeedleThreader]

The powers that be want Hillary elected not Trump. If anything they set this up so that Hillary could easily squash Trump. She will just pull his tax records or something against him and take the election...I was not looking forward to a Hillary timeline but knew it was inevitable.

[ErtheVessel]

I agree with Andre and NeedleThreader that Trump is a way to get Hillary elected. She was becoming so unpopular, they had to do something drastic to get the focus off of her smarminess.

Something that is interesting to me is; I know I have heard Alex Jones say that all presidents of the US are pre-selected by the Bilderbergers. I can't remember where I heard him say that, though. Does anyone else remember that? So I am wondering why he is endorsing Trump when he has said in the past that we the people don't really elect our presidents anyway.

[Cardillac]

Trump (manipulated) is simply telling the sheeple what they want to hear as did Obama (manipulated) in his 1st presidential campaign (like "more transparency on Capitol Hill"- under his watch there's been an even more veiled Capitol Hill); history most definitely repeats itself and the same card continues to be played; why can't people see this finally?!-

the more emphatically a politician states something the more the opposite will come to pass if they are elected (hey, folks, the game is rigged)-

"politics may not be the oldest profession but the results are the same"- attributed to Ronald Reagan

be well all-

Larry

[Kryztian]

If Trump becomes the next CEO of the corporation of the united states it will be because the board of directors wanted him to.



The board of directors consider Trump a valuable asset, not for the minor role of being the President, but for his major role in their major mind control operation: the 2016 Presidential election, aka the mass brain washing of America.

It is clear that the media coverage Trump has received is way out of proportion with his popularity and that only happens because the board of directors has ordered them to do so. It is not only necessary to build up a group of Trump supporters, but also an even larger contingent of those who are outraged and frightened by him. We now have liberal and conservative and moderate talking about Trump, Trump, Trump and Trump and clearly it is a divisive issue that is fragment the people into different factions. We aren't talking about how to stop the wars or how to get GMOs labeled or how to stop the TPP treaty or NSA surveillance. We are talking about TRUMP. Clearly, the board of directors have gotten us just where they want.

2016 is going to be the first fear based election ever. You will have to choose among the lesser of evils demanding on which candidate frightens you the least. Sarah Palin did a great job of disturbing Americans in 2008 but clearly the TRUMP is an even better performer in Psyop.

[Andre]

If Trump becomes the next CEO of the corporation of the united states it will be because the board of directors wanted him to.



The board of directors consider Trump a valuable asset, not for the minor role of being the President, but for his major role in their major mind control operation: the 2016 Presidential election, aka the mass brain washing of America.

It is clear that the media coverage Trump has received is way out of proportion with his popularity and that only happens because the board of directors has ordered them to do so. It is not only necessary to build up a group of Trump supporters, but also an even larger contingent of those who are outraged and frightened by him. We now have liberal and conservative and moderate talking about Trump, Trump, Trump and Trump and clearly it is a divisive issue that is fragment the people into different factions. We aren't talking about how to stop the wars or how to get GMOs labeled or how to stop the TPP treaty or NSA surveillance. We are talking about TRUMP. Clearly, the board of directors have gotten us just where they want.

2016 is going to be the first fear based election ever. You will have to choose among the lesser of evils demanding on which candidate frightens you the least. Sarah Palin did a great job of disturbing Americans in 2008 but clearly the TRUMP is an even better performer in Psyop.

Kryztian, I couldn't agree more. The fact that the MSM has promoted Trump so heavily clearly indicates that the board of directors want it that way. And as you suggest, promoting a wild card like Trump ensures them that no real issues are covered during the Presidential race which is always the way they like it. And, again, as you indicate, they can use Trump to further divide the public. So in this sense, Trump is being used. Who knows, he may not even be aware of the total and complete control exerted over the White House by this board of directors. As a megalomaniac, it could be that his huge ego is operating under the mistaken believe that he will call the shots once he's in the White House. Huh!

I also agree that the board of directors don't need to worry too much who gets in as President because they know they control the White House and not the President. (As an aside, this could be one of the reasons why Presidential candidates are so convincing during election campaigns. The board of directors give these candidates free reign to make all kinds of promises, knowing that once they are in the White House, the new President will be told that whatever promises they made on the campaign trail mean nothing now unless it suits the board of directors. And if it's someone like a Trump who finds himself seated in the Oval Office, all they have to do is make it clear that what happened to JFK can happen to him and his family if he doesn't behave like a good little puppet. Of course, they would never have to do that with Hillary since she is a completely compliant puppet already).

Again, Kryztian, I agree that unless by some miracle Bernie gets up, which is unfortunately doubtful, this will be a fear based election when it comes down to Trump or Clinton.

As for Alex Jones, yes, he is doing the board of directors a big favor helping to offer-up Trump to the huge swell of anti-establishment voters, many of whom are Jones followers.

[T Smith]

I agree with Matt except that I think there is a strong possibility that Trump is a decoy to get Hillary elected. It is almost a given that Trump will become the Republican nominee and will be up against Hillary. So, would it not make sense for the U.S. branch of the "World Management Team" to engineer the elections so that the choice gets down to a crazed billionaire or Hillary? In that way, they are banking on Hillary winning the Presidential race. Thoughts anyone?



Yes, but why would they need Trump for that? Let's just assume that Trump is a ringer for Hillary to get her elected. If so, Hillary would easily decimate the other candidates as well. Why Trump? Let's see, besides Trump we've got a whining boy-scout-Jeb-Bush-mini-me and a guy so conservative he only wears a gray suit. There just isn't a broad enough appeal there to seriously challenge Hillary. And then there's the creme puff Mitt Romney. Seemingly nice-guy facade, but... not what the people want, and certainly no match for Hilary. In any case, Hillary wins.

In my opinion, and now assuming Trump is not a decoy, he is the only candidate who can potentially take Hillary down. She is just such a flawed candidate. But she also is a coddled candidate highly protected by the Media and by her cream-puff opponents (e.g, Mitt Romney et al). The result is a good chunk of the American public have no idea whatsoever just what kind of criminal and deviant this woman is.

In a downright brawl with Trump (again, the other cream-puff candidates will go through the motions of sparring with her, but with kid gloves), he'll destroy her. I predict, in a Trump/Clinton matchup, a great number of people are going to wake up to what kind of person Hillary Clinton really is.