PDA

View Full Version : Ted Cruz ate a tic tac (or something!!) in the 3 March GOP Debate



jagman
4th March 2016, 06:37
over and out

Jantje
4th March 2016, 10:04
I guess that's yankee politics in a nutshell. It's all about the BS and not about the content. The only thing the rest of the world can be sure of is when this gameshow is over and done it will suffer from the insane american foreign policies. arrggh

Matt P
4th March 2016, 11:54
I guess that's yankee politics in a nutshell. It's all about the BS and not about the content. The only thing the rest of the world can be sure of is when this gameshow is over and done it will suffer from the insane american foreign policies. arrggh

Boy, you're right and I am sometimes really ashamed to be an American because of my criminal government. I lived briefly in Amsterdam, as well as Spain, Italy, Germany and Japan. I'm almost a little scared at the thought of leaving the US anymore. I keep wondering when the rest of the world is going to gang up and put us in our deserved place for allowing this insanity under our watch.
Sorry mate.

Matt

Jantje
4th March 2016, 12:34
I guess that's yankee politics in a nutshell. It's all about the BS and not about the content. The only thing the rest of the world can be sure of is when this gameshow is over and done it will suffer from the insane american foreign policies. arrggh

Boy, you're right and I am sometimes really ashamed to be an American because of my criminal government. I lived briefly in Amsterdam, as well as Spain, Italy, Germany and Japan. I'm almost a little scared at the thought of leaving the US anymore. I keep wondering when the rest of the world is going to gang up and put us in our deserved place for allowing this insanity under our watch.
Sorry mate.

Matt

Well it certainly is not your fault Matt. I think you are an example of a truely great american. I'm saying this as quite a fresh member, but longtime lurker who surely took notice of your previous posts. Thank you

A Voice from the Mountains
5th March 2016, 00:17
They're not going to put real issues on TV. You can forget about that. If you want to read the back story on all of these people you have to research it yourself online. It's a matter of the lesser of the several evils but there is also a huge struggle going on in power structures behind the scenes.

I don't see how any European countries are in any better of a position than the US. I think because of centuries of eurocentrist brainwashing, Europe puts out this image of being the most civilized and sophisticated continent on Earth, and many Americans buy into it, when the EU is in more debt than the US, has a much more fragile economic situation, and often has much more ridiculous laws and bigger "nanny state" governments. In the UK you can't even buy a butter knife unless you're 18 years old. In Europe maybe this makes you feel safe but to most Americans it just sounds weak and ridiculous, like the British government is babysitting people who are too incompetent or immoral to use a blunt knife until they turn 18 years old.

Not to mention the British still have a monarchy, which is an institution that should have been left in the Middle Ages. The Netherlands also has a monarchy and its monarchs have dirt on them just as the British and Spanish and all the other surviving European monarchies do, meaning they are run by the same criminal cartels as the US is. If you look at the Bilderberg list, these are obviously international groups running all western nations and then some. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands looks as though he was a real piece of work, maybe someone that would make Bush Sr. look like not such a bad guy.

JgnAWY0RoeE


You could sum up the candidates like this:

Rubio -- A Neo-con, wants to initiate hostilities in the Middle East and end the peace deal with Iran. A puppet backed by the Bush faction, Jeb Bush referred to as his "mentor," probably used to be a "servant boy" for them.

Cruz -- Rabid supporter of the Rothschild-owned nation of Israel, says he will end the peace deal with Iran as soon as he gets into office. Likes to pretend that he's an evangelist preacher on a moral crusade.

Trump -- Is not a political insider and is probably being backed by the Pentagon in order to keep the usual political mafia-types out of the White House. Will say whatever he thinks he has to, but will be a puppet just like any of the others -- except NOT for the traditional political power groups, and people realize this in their own way. Has the support of ex-DIA chief who publicly criticized Obama for knowlingly contributing to the creation of ISIS. Trump being elected would be a major event in the counter-coup being staged against the Bush clan which has had political dominance since Kennedy was assassinated. This is the single biggest reason why the election cycle has devolved into insults and name-calling. Meanwhile his rivals have actually picked up on some of positions, like the wall, without crediting him, and after having criticized him for them before,.

Clinton -- Plenty of info online about this woman. She has been in politics long enough already to have a long record of corruption and abuse of power and deserves to be in prison, culpability with what happened in Benghazi and hiding her State Department email server away in her own home (and then deleting some 30,000 emails from it when she was found out, before turning it over) only being the two most recent examples. She is the classic mafia-type politician working for the CFR and other interests, and probably a legitimate sociopath to boot.

Sanders -- Like Trump does not appear to be a political insider, despite being a congressman for years (the only independent congressmen for years). Is a socialist.


Bottom line is that most of these, on either side, are going to continue to try to push the same policies that we saw under Bush and the first part of Obama's regime: hostilities in the Middle East and table pounding for world war and a surveillance state at home. The only two exceptions would be Trump or Sanders, which is not to say that they would even be "good" presidents but at least they would not be Bush fascists. Even though the Pentagon is probably the faction backing Trump, he talks about working with Russia and China through diplomatic and economic channels, which is critical in stabilizing the world situation. The Pentagon has already been working with Russia and Iran, which is why we have the peace deal with Iran now and why Russia is being allowed to destroy ISIS in Syria despite ISIS being a CIA (Bush clan) creation.

If you just look at the surface of these things like they are presented on TV, you will never get the big picture. What is really going on is not going to be broadcast on TV. Even online you have to dig for it and read a lot. There is a counter-coup going on right now in the US which will have major implications, and the circus show on television is meant to be a distraction and mischaracterization of everything.

jagman
7th March 2016, 05:16
They're not going to put real issues on TV. You can forget about that. If you want to read the back story on all of these people you have to research it yourself online. It's a matter of the lesser of the several evils but there is also a huge struggle going on in power structures behind the scenes.

I don't see how any European countries are in any better of a position than the US. I think because of centuries of eurocentrist brainwashing, Europe puts out this image of being the most civilized and sophisticated continent on Earth, and many Americans buy into it, when the EU is in more debt than the US, has a much more fragile economic situation, and often has much more ridiculous laws and bigger "nanny state" governments. In the UK you can't even buy a butter knife unless you're 18 years old. In Europe maybe this makes you feel safe but to most Americans it just sounds weak and ridiculous, like the British government is babysitting people who are too incompetent or immoral to use a blunt knife until they turn 18 years old.

Not to mention the British still have a monarchy, which is an institution that should have been left in the Middle Ages. The Netherlands also has a monarchy and its monarchs have dirt on them just as the British and Spanish and all the other surviving European monarchies do, meaning they are run by the same criminal cartels as the US is. If you look at the Bilderberg list, these are obviously international groups running all western nations and then some. Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands looks as though he was a real piece of work, maybe someone that would make Bush Sr. look like not such a bad guy.

JgnAWY0RoeE


You could sum up the candidates like this:

Rubio -- A Neo-con, wants to initiate hostilities in the Middle East and end the peace deal with Iran. A puppet backed by the Bush faction, Jeb Bush referred to as his "mentor," probably used to be a "servant boy" for them.

Cruz -- Rabid supporter of the Rothschild-owned nation of Israel, says he will end the peace deal with Iran as soon as he gets into office. Likes to pretend that he's an evangelist preacher on a moral crusade.

Trump -- Is not a political insider and is probably being backed by the Pentagon in order to keep the usual political mafia-types out of the White House. Will say whatever he thinks he has to, but will be a puppet just like any of the others -- except NOT for the traditional political power groups, and people realize this in their own way. Has the support of ex-DIA chief who publicly criticized Obama for knowlingly contributing to the creation of ISIS. Trump being elected would be a major event in the counter-coup being staged against the Bush clan which has had political dominance since Kennedy was assassinated. This is the single biggest reason why the election cycle has devolved into insults and name-calling. Meanwhile his rivals have actually picked up on some of positions, like the wall, without crediting him, and after having criticized him for them before,.

Clinton -- Plenty of info online about this woman. She has been in politics long enough already to have a long record of corruption and abuse of power and deserves to be in prison, culpability with what happened in Benghazi and hiding her State Department email server away in her own home (and then deleting some 30,000 emails from it when she was found out, before turning it over) only being the two most recent examples. She is the classic mafia-type politician working for the CFR and other interests, and probably a legitimate sociopath to boot.

Sanders -- Like Trump does not appear to be a political insider, despite being a congressman for years (the only independent congressmen for years). Is a socialist.


Bottom line is that most of these, on either side, are going to continue to try to push the same policies that we saw under Bush and the first part of Obama's regime: hostilities in the Middle East and table pounding for world war and a surveillance state at home. The only two exceptions would be Trump or Sanders, which is not to say that they would even be "good" presidents but at least they would not be Bush fascists. Even though the Pentagon is probably the faction backing Trump, he talks about working with Russia and China through diplomatic and economic channels, which is critical in stabilizing the world situation. The Pentagon has already been working with Russia and Iran, which is why we have the peace deal with Iran now and why Russia is being allowed to destroy ISIS in Syria despite ISIS being a CIA (Bush clan) creation.

If you just look at the surface of these things like they are presented on TV, you will never get the big picture. What is really going on is not going to be broadcast on TV. Even online you have to dig for it and read a lot. There is a counter-coup going on right now in the US which will have major implications, and the circus show on television is meant to be a distraction and mischaracterization of everything.


Thank you for the post.I was going to write a thread about this but
I'ts a scary subject! I watched the Newt Gingrich Interview live that
night and when he said To Bill "The reason why the GOP won't
accept Donald Trump was because "He's not a member of their group,
He's Not a member of Their Secret Society"! My jaw practically hit
the floor! I see An Unholy alliance being formed.

Donald will Take Ted Cruz for his Vice President. The Same way JFK
took Lyndon B Johnson and for pretty much the same reason.
He will bring home Texas The way Lyndon Did for JFK.
They will negotiate a deal where Ted will get to pick the next Supreme
Court Justice and will adopt some of Teds Policies Like abolishing the
IRS.
This is what I have foreseen In a vision 3 days ago.