Programmer testifies under oath to being hired to rig elections

[justntime2learn]

I understand these thing are no surprise to us.

I was wondering what everyone thought of the authenticity of this story and website?

"The presidential election this year is a high-stakes operation, with a five-way break among ideologies. On the Democrats side, Bernie Sanders is a socialist populist, against big business and for destroying the economy of the United States. He may not say that, but his policies ensure it. Hillary Clinton is the Democrat establishment candidate that plans on milking big business and Wall Street for all they’re worth in exchange for tons of special favors and cash.

Marco Rubio is the Republican establishment candidate who promises the fat cat Republican politicians steady employment and business as usual. Ted Cruz is the stern conservative evangelical who will bring this country to heel. And Donald Trump is the unpredictable populist who is promising things that are not his to give, but which sound quite enticing to a weary and demoralized middle America.

Each of these candidates desperately want to win, and each is willing to steal the election in whatever way is possible. That includes rigging the primaries, caucuses, and the ultimate election. Unfortunately, that is where we are, and although it is a shocking reality, the people are not shocked to find out that the fix is in. In fact, there is a video on page two of a computer technician telling Congress how it is done.

See video proving fraud, page 2:"

http://www.truthandaction.org/programmer-testifies-oath-hired-rig-elections/

[Nan]

This is an authentic story. I saw this several years ago. I believe the Diebold machines were rigged in favor of Bush.

[Calz]

Elections have been rigged long before the voting machines.

Anyone remember "hanging chads"???

You know ... what brought the world cowboy bush???



In fact, there is a video on page two of a computer technician telling Congress how it is done.


Congress critters know exactly how it is done. They may be treasonous scum ... but they are not stupid.

[Cidersomerset]

I have done serious posts about this and its as old as ' democracy' , but here's a
more basic explanation...

Blackadder rotten borough

ZIyhwDM-neM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The movie Lincoln also shows corrupt politicians in the US at the time and it was
quite common to 'buy' votes as it still is with the 'Corporate vote' and lobby
systems. Let alone vote rigging, lost votes , abuse of 'dead peoples' votes and all
manor of 'scullduggery' I read something the other day that President
Johnson was allegedly infamous for using votes from the 'grave yard' to win his
senator seat for Texas in 1948. Now cyber fraud is just bringing it up to date.....
There were claims of discrepancies in the recent Scottish referendum vote
and the upcoming EU vote will be interesting.

[gord]

Hanging chad. Yup. Anyone remember Janet Reno helping cover up vote fraud in Florida in the 70s?

[Cidersomerset]

Hanging chad. Yup. Anyone remember Janet Reno helping cover up vote fraud in Florida in the 70s?

It did not work as Jeb Bush showed ......

http://republicansexposed.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/jeb-bush-petition.jpg

Now how is it these same old powerfull families always seem to end up in
power. There names may or may not change but they seem on the whole
to be related, and the 'bloodline' seems to go back a long way...

That's when researchers like David Icke and others started pointing this
out to a wide public audience they were portrayed as 'nutters' but the more
we are finding the more plausible it is.....

[NeedleThreader]

Benjamin Fulford predicted a scandal with Microsoft voting software a few months back and its implications...

Not really a fan of Fulford.

http://benjaminfulford.net/2016/02/01/the-empire-strikes-out-as-khazarian-mafia-fake-zika-virus-negative-interest-rate-offensives-fail/

[Calz]

When there is a dramatic advantage then there is only so far they can go.

If Trump has a vast majority of the polls going into an election then he (or anyone) cannot be stopped.

It takes a *vast* majority to do so however.

[AriG]

Charlie Rose let one slip this morning. He said of Trump "they're not going to let him win".. and Charlie Rose should know. He's a Bilderberger.

[Peace of Mind]

They are all in it together, before the election they have to put on a n act to keep the people distracted and in check.
The best candidate obviously should be one that can actually relate to the people. Probably someone who has recent experience and success with living check to check, being creative with juggling mortgage payments, school tuition, children affairs, and social discord due to inequality and lack of opportunity’s.
Most of today’s wealthy people are heartless, greed driven, overly competitive, insensitive and deceitful. Politicians are built like this. But, these are not true leadership qualities. Thou, somehow these seem to be the most respected attributes for modern day presidency. Why?

We don’t need to be lead. We don’t need leaders with the mindset of upholding the organized slave system. If a leader is in need…he/she needs to be sensible, considerate, courageous enough to say the current system is heavily flawed, unfair, outdated and in dire immediate need of reform. They need to engage the public on every level, in every neighborhood by providing actual solutions…not probabilities. We all know the problems and the remedies.

We need someone that is going to be real, convince the masses that we are all in need of change if a fair and improved system is to be put in place. Someone to uplift the people to be more caring and responsible, instead of creating more and more social groups, dividing them with religion, sports, false standards, and poli-tiricks.

The president should be someone that will be admired and respected around the world… not someone causing wars, making threats, giving empty promises, regurgitating ill fallacies, smear campaigning, pretending to know exactly what will make things right… yet always always always fail to tell you exactly just what that is. As you continue to give them undeserved attention, they will continue to to use it to manipulate, control, fashion your future.

Peace

[conk]

One of the most egregious aspects of electronic voting is there is no easy audit trail.

[AriG]

They are all in it together, before the election they have to put on a n act to keep the people distracted and in check.
The best candidate obviously should be one that can actually relate to the people. Probably someone who has recent experience and success with living check to check, being creative with juggling mortgage payments, school tuition, children affairs, and social discord due to inequality and lack of opportunity’s.
Most of today’s wealthy people are heartless, greed driven, overly competitive, insensitive and deceitful. Politicians are built like this. But, these are not true leadership qualities. Thou, somehow these seem to be the most respected attributes for modern day presidency. Why?

We don’t need to be lead. We don’t need leaders with the mindset of upholding the organized slave system. If a leader is in need…he/she needs to be sensible, considerate, courageous enough to say the current system is heavily flawed, unfair, outdated and in dire immediate need of reform. They need to engage the public on every level, in every neighborhood by providing actual solutions…not probabilities. We all know the problems and the remedies.

We need someone that is going to be real, convince the masses that we are all in need of change if a fair and improved system is to be put in place. Someone to uplift the people to be more caring and responsible, instead of creating more and more social groups, dividing them with religion, sports, false standards, and poli-tiricks.

The president should be someone that will be admired and respected around the world… not someone causing wars, making threats, giving empty promises, regurgitating ill fallacies, smear campaigning, pretending to know exactly what will make things right… yet always always always fail to tell you exactly just what that is. As you continue to give them undeserved attention, they will continue to to use it to manipulate, control, fashion your future.

Peace

Out of all of them, Bernie Sanders fits the requirement. But he is too intelligent and too caring to be palatable to the brainwashed masses who are now casting their votes on line as to whether Kim Kardashian's nude selfie was appropriate :facepalm:

¤=[Post Update]=¤


When there is a dramatic advantage then there is only so far they can go.

If Trump has a vast majority of the polls going into an election then he (or anyone) cannot be stopped.

It takes a *vast* majority to do so however.

Let's hope that he doesn't. Watching his dog and pony is reminiscent of Hitler's rise in the 30's.

[Valley]

A very powerful/revealing video there, indeed. Why not just post it up here?...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEzY2tnwExs
:bowing: :clap2:

[Carmody]

It looks like the USA Vote in November is to be a 'close vote', in many places.

Those who steal electrons through rigged electronic voting hardware very much love the idea of a close vote, as in such situations, a stealing of the vote via rigging the electronics of the voting hardware, is in it's most desirable condition.

Which is one of being too close to call.

If the vote is too far off, meaning exit polls and pre-vote polls have it at over 10-15-20%, then rigging the electronics to change the vote is more difficult. The rigging can be seen in such cases. And it has been seen, in the pre-vote polls and in the exit polls. Those poles are historically never off by more than a few points.

Yet, in areas where the vote was electronically rigged, the exit polls and pre-vote polls disagreed with one another by 10-15-20%. Which has never happened in all known polling history, ie in over 100 years of polling history in USA elections, it has never happened.

It appeared ONLY with the advent of electronic voting hardware. In the exact voting districts in question.

The evidence does not just suggest, but indicates, in a way that would be considered factual in a court of law... for obtaining a conviction of a crime -in a case brought about over electronic vote rigging.


If the vote difference is found to be a few percent pre-vote polling and in exit polling, then it is monumentally easy to hide any electronic vote rigging.

My suggestion is to bring up the subject of electronic voting as a thing to be removed, before the election. To make it legal to vote only via paper and hand counting with all records and vote paper kept and held in secure locations.

electronic voting is trivially easy to rig.... and there is still enough time, before the November election in the given states under scrutiny to legally challenge the electronic voting hardware. to gain an injunction against electronic voting.

failing that, plan b, planned and enacted in parallel and up and running at the same time...is to bring a kubotan key chain to the voting stations and be of the first few in line to vote.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d0/Ku2.JPG

Get rid of the given electronic voting hardware that is the problem. Force a return to the backup paper system that will be at the given location, in case the electronics fail.

Misdemeanor crime--- save a country and possibly half a planet or more.

It's an easy trade off.

[Franny]

As a computer programmer I can say that it's easy to rig the software to give a vote to candidate A when a voter votes for candidate B and give them a receipt telling them their vote went to A. It can be set to give a certain percentage of votes in each district based on the voting population so the vote comes out only a few points ahead for the chosen one making it look like local polls were not quite accurate. An accuracy rating of + or - 4% on the pre election poll can help voters get the picture.

Exit polls have been loudly dismissed as inaccurate when they disagree with the official count so exit polls are not reported as much as they used to be - and people forget that.

And yes, I also would like to see a return to paper votes counted by a selection of voters double and triple checking the vote.

We've often heard that a political system is a necessary evil which tends to suggest that political systems are...intrinsically evil. Maybe it's time to think in terms other than evil for ways in which to organize society. It isn't really necessary.


33816

[xbusymom]

that video was done in 2006; and if they could do that then... think what they can do now- now that there is NO paper ballots to dispute the computerized vote tally.

[Carmody]

Lawsuit Filed: Court To Count Real Bernie Sanders Vote Tally (http://yournewswire.com/lawsuit-filed-court-to-count-real-bernie-sanders-vote-tally/)


Bernie Sanders earned more pledged delegates than Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primaries and now a long awaited lawsuit has finally been filed in Ohio alleging that systematic and coordinated election fraud stole the presidential nomination from Sanders.

Filed by the Institute for American Democracy and Election Integrity, the lawsuit presents evidence of statistically impossible differences between exit polls and electronic vote totals.

The first stage of the legal action will involve obtaining raw exit poll data from a media consortium. The second stage will seek access to actual ballots for recounts and verification of machine totals.

Cliff Arnebeck, a prominent election integrity attorney leading the case, states:

“Bob Fitrakis the lawyer and board member and writer of the Columbus Institute of Contemporary Journalism, has filed the first Ohio Election Integrity Lawsuit against Edison Media Research to release the raw data which shows such dramatic differences on exit polls and electronic vote totals in eleven states in the presidential primaries throughout the US.

Our examining the ballots will show us who really won the Democratic presidential primary. Although Bernie may have already conceded by that time or before then, at least he will know what the truth was about how many votes he really garnered. He can do with that what he wants.”