Robert De Niro Reveals He Pushed For Screening of Anti-Vaccine Movie at Tribeca Film Festival

[Curious77]

Robert De Niro Reveals He Pushed For Screening of Anti-Vaccine Movie at Tribeca Film Festival

The announcement that the film would be included at the Tribeca Film Festival was made on Tuesday and met with opposition, the Los Angeles Times reports. However, that hasn't stopped De Niro – who is a co-founder of the festival – from stepping forward and revealing that he pushed for the documentary's inclusion.

The man behind the movie is anti-vaccine leader Andrew Wakefield, who is also expected to be present at the viewing of his documentary. Wakefield has been known as a much disputed adversary of the scientific community, as some believe he distributes false information about vaccinations.

"Grace and I have a child with autism and we believe it is critical that all of the issues surrounding the causes of autism be openly discussed and examined," De Niro, 72, said, referring to his wife and their 18-year-old son Elliot. "In the 15 years since the Tribeca Film Festival was founded, I have never asked for a film to be screened or gotten involved in the programming."

"However, this is very personal to me and my family and I want there to be a discussion, which is why we will be screening Vaxxed. I am not personally endorsing the film, nor am I anti-vaccination; I am only providing the opportunity for a conversation around the issue."

http://www.people.com/article/robet-de-niro-reveals-he-backed-screening-of-vaccine-documentary


We only harm ourselves when we create taboo subjects --
DeNiro is right, this subject needs discussion.

[Hervé]

The vaccine film Robert De Niro won’t let his audience see (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/03/27/the-vaccine-film-robert-deniro-wont-let-his-audience-see/)

by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Mar27 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/03/27/the-vaccine-film-robert-deniro-wont-let-his-audience-see/), 2016

Robert De Niro, who has a child with autism, was going to personally introduce the film, Vaxxed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdCU2DfMBpU), to the audience at his Tribeca Film Festival in New York.

He thought the film was important (http://www.thewrap.com/robert-de-niro-defends-showing-anti-vaccination-documentary-at-tribeca/). It makes a case for a connection between vaccines and autism.

Then, an uproar ensued, pressure was brought to bear, and De Niro decided to cancel the screening at his festival (http://www.thewrap.com/robert-de-niro-pulls-anti-vaccination-documentary-from-tribeca-film-festival/).

Hello, goodbye.

One of the angles used to pressure him? People might agree with the film’s content and decide not vaccinate their children, or they might decide to space the vaccines out over a longer period of time. This horrible act might endanger lives. It might kill children.

Therefore, don’t let people see the film. Don’t let them be contaminated. Don’t let them make up their own minds. Don’t let them have access to information. You see, the parents themselves are children wandering in the wilderness, with no ability to analyze information. They must defer to the experts. They mustn’t listen to other voices. They mustn’t be permitted to think.

Free speech? Never, ever heard of it.

You see, this is Science. Only certain people know what science says or means. They are the chosen few in the palace. They decide for the rest of us. They are the little gods and the censors.

I don’t know about you, but I’m sick and tired of this bull****.

On big screens all over the country, you can put up movies depicting people being torn limb from limb, drowning in their own blood, you can put up movies with panting soft-porn money shots, you can put up movies that blow up half the world; but you can’t show a movie that questions the effects of vaccines.

That’s show biz, where the stars are co-opted on a daily basis, and if they move off the dime, they’re attacked in the press.

But so what?

Listen, Robert, you could have shown the film, and you could have laid on a live presentation afterwards, with speakers delivering both sides of the issue right there in the theater. You could have stood up and said you weren’t going to be bulldozed. You could have said Film itself is based on the sanctity of free speech and there was no way you were going to sacrifice that principle. You could have drawn a line in the sand. You could have parlayed your reputation and awards in the industry to make a point. You could have explained who pressured you and why. You could have refused to let the moment pass. You could have broken the back of censorship, and you could have enlisted the aid of a few of your famous friends, right up on stage, to back you up. You could have turned the whole thing around, because after all, you were just preparing to show a film. That’s what you were doing. With enough force behind your words (you know how to do that, don’t you?), you could have exposed the whole insane sham of Don’t Show a Film. You could have said, “This is not the Censored Tribeca Film Festival. That’s not the name of this event and it never will be.” You could have blown the doors apart. You could have gone live and done in public, for once, what you do on the screen. You could have hit the censors in their snake eyes and put them away. You could have gone on The View and Fallon and Kimmel and Oprah and made your case against the people who want to shut down free speech. And you know you could have scored a victory.

But you didn’t do that. You backed down.

It’s not too late. You can still fire up your courage and your outrage and show the film. It’s your festival. You’re the boss.

Do you realize the size of the rock you’re standing on? Do you know what the First Amendment really means?

So what if you’re shy in public. So what if you need a script?

I’ll give you a script. I’ll give you one. It’ll melt the spines of those arrogant cowards who want the public to obey and keep their mouths shut and submit to wall-to-wall surveillance and march all the way to their graves without a whimper in the land of the free and the home of the brave.

Jon Rappoport

¤=[Post Update]=¤


[...]
.... Wakefield has been known as a much disputed adversary of the scientific community, as some believe he distributes false information about vaccinations.
[...]

One can find more about Wakefield and Thompson here: Breaking: CDC whistleblower William Thompson's Bombshells (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?74107-Breaking-CDC-whistleblower-William-Thompson-s-Bombshells)

[Hervé]

As for discussion, one can check this thread: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate? (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?71330-Do-vaccines-contribute-to-autism-Should-we-vaccinate)

[T Smith]

I am somewhat confused... post 1 and post 2 seem to contradict themselves... Can the OP please clarify?

***EDIT... Never mind. Got it. Missed the first paragraph***

[lilac]

Natural News has reported today that de Niro cancelled the screening. Personally, I think it's ok. He brought it to our attention - enough said. Now we know he's onside and aware and that there's a good movie to watch. He doesn't have to walk on hot coals. Celebrities need to choose their battles and there are plenty of them.

[onawah]

Vaxxed: How did they threaten Robert De Niro?
March 27, 2016
by Jon Rappoport
Vaxxed: How did they threaten Robert De Niro?

De Niro talked to Congressman about censored Vaxxed film


“On July 26, 2000, the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association published a review by Dr. Barbara Starfield, a revered public-health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Dr. Starfield’s review, ‘Is US health really the best in the world?’, concluded that, every year in the US, the medical system kills 225,000 people. That’s 2.25 million killings per decade.” (Jon Rappoport, The Starfield Revelation)

This is explosive.

This is about a film no one can see, because it exposes lunatics and destroyers in the vaccine industry.

Here is a quote from the Vaxxed producer and director, after their film was just axed from Robert De Niro’s Tribeca Festival (as reported by Jeremy Gerard, see: “‘Vaxxed’ Filmmakers Accuse De Niro, Tribeca Film Fest Of ‘Censorship’ In Wake Of Cancelation,” 3/26/2016):

“’To our dismay, we learned today about the Tribeca Film Festival’s decision to reverse the official selection of Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe,’ said Andrew Wakefield and Del Bigtree (the director and producer, respectively). Robert De Niro’s original defense of the film happened Friday after a one-hour conversation between De Niro and Bill Posey, the congressman who has interacted directly and at length with the CDC Whistleblower (William Thompson) and whose team has scrutinized the documents that prove fraud at the CDC. …” (emphasis added)

Okay. So here is the sequence…

One, De Niro, who has an autistic child, decides to screen Vaxxed at his Tribeca Festival. It’s a film that reveals lies and crimes, and shows there is a causative connection between vaccines and autism.

Two, pressure is applied to De Niro, so he meets with Florida Congressman Bill Posey, who lets him know the film is right on target. Posey knows, because he and his team have many pages of documents from CDC researcher, William Thompson, who blew the whistle on vaccine-autism fraud in 2014.

Three, De Niro decides he’ll not only screen the film, he’ll introduce it himself, live, onstage.

Four, out of the shadows emerge people who put the screws to De Niro. What do they tell him? His career in film will end? His annual Tribeca Film Festival will go down the toilet? The medical treatment his autistic child is receiving will be cut off? He and family are now “not safe?”

Five, De Niro backs away and cancels the showing of Vaxxed.

He’s been taught a lesson. Don’t go up against the medical cartel. Keep your mouth shut. Suffer in silence.

Think about this. You can see a film about US drone strikes killing innocent civilians. You can see a film about criminal surveillance of the entire population. You can see a film about the CIA overthrowing foreign governments. You can see a film about mega-corporations spewing chemicals into towns, where children are born with defects and adults are dying of cancer.

But you can’t see a film that suggests a vaccine could be causing autism.

That’s too hot.

That strikes at a secret too big to tell.

That torpedoes a monopoly that must be protected, no matter what.

Censored. Blacked out.

To boil down the background: In 2014, long-time respected CDC researcher, William Thompson, made a statement asserting that he and several esteemed colleagues had lied about a key study they authored 10 years earlier.

The study actually revealed a connection between the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine and the onset of autism in young black boys—but that part of the study was censored.

In fact, Thompson said, he and his colleagues sat in a room at the CDC, brought in a garbage can, and threw out those pages of research. That’s right.

But Thompson kept copies of the pages. Congressman Bill Posey and a few other people have those pages.

Thompson says, through his lawyer, that he will not speak to reporters. He’ll work with Congress, if an investigation is mounted. But there is no indication Congressional hearings will ever be laid on.

Because this story is too big.

This is the subject of the film, Vaxxed. The betrayal of the people by the Centers for Disease Control.

You can bet your bottom dollar that the prospect of Vaxxed being shown at Robert De Niro’s own festival—with him on stage introducing it—raised alarms at the CDC. Loud ones.

There is a very good chance that the CDC reached out to someone, who in turn reached out to De Niro and whispered in his ear and caused the actor to pause for thought.

He paused, and decided to turn around. He decided the risk was too great. He laid down his sword, such as it was, and went dark.


First Amendment? Never heard of it.

We now live in a country where the government decides, when it needs to, how to “protect the population” from “dangerous information.”

In this case, the Hippocratic Oath is turned inside out. It becomes: “First, do harm.”

Vaccines can cause autism? Well, sure, but don’t tell people that. Lie and keep lying, and keep calling it science.

Who cares how many children are destroyed?

Protect the medical monopoly.

Protect the vaccinators.

Don’t let a film see the light of day.

But it will. One way or another, it will be shown and people will see it and then they will know.

[Andre]

Here's a list of last year's Tribeca Film Festival sponsors: https://tribecafilm.com/sponsor-block. As you can see, there are a large number of heavy corporate types and there's no doubt Big Pharma got on the phone to a few of them and denigrated the Vaxxed producer, director and writer. Those sponsors then called Tribeca and expressed their "disappointment" that the film festival would support such a "questionable" documentary. That would have been just one angle the Big Pharma Public Affairs people would have exploited.

[onawah]

The Canary Party posted this on Facebook today:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=293&v=tvcdh7KlgPI


Here is the uncut interview of VAXXED producer Del Bigtree. Only 5 seconds of this interview aired on ABC World News.

[Andre]

Here's what the producer of Vaxxed, Del Bigtree had to say today about his film and the blatant censorship that has now taken over in the USA:

"To watch every major newspaper tell people not to see a movie, a movie they had never seen, is an unprecedented moment in this country. When has that ever happened?

"Every major newspaper is saying don't go see a movie they haven't watched themselves. What's next, are they going to tell us to start burning books in the streets? We've never seen anything like this.

"This is supposed to be a country based on freedom of expression, and our entire media that [claims to] represent speech and expression, is telling everybody to shut down free speech. Journalism is officially DEAD in America.

"We have a whistleblower at the CDC who is still sitting at the CDC, an awarded scientist, who is being protected by whistleblower status, and the media is saying we are making things up. They say they've debunked the whistleblower, but you can't debunk someone who hasn't had his day in court, just like you can't review a movie you haven't seen."

[Cidersomerset]

VAXXED producer Del Bigtree UNCUT full interview with ABC World News

By David on 29 March 2016 GMT

tvcdh7KlgPI

Published on 27 Mar 2016

This is the full UNCUT interview that ABC World News conducted with Del
Bigtree of the "VAXXED" documentary now censored by Robert De Niro
and the Tribeca Film Festival.

ABC News used only five seconds from this interview...

Find out what else they didn't want you to see...

Follow this full story at NaturalNews.com

[Cidersomerset]

Vaxxed From Cover Up to Catastrophe TRAILER

EdCU2DfMBpU

Published on 23 Mar 2016
Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe. Premieres at Tribeca Film Festival,
Sunday, April 24, 2016 @ 2:00pm



-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pressure to censor VAXXED documentary at Tribeca Film Festival came from
the Nazi-linked Sloan Foundation, headed by CFR member Paul Joskow

By David on 29 March 2016 GMT


============================================

NATURAL NEWS......

BREAKING: Pressure to censor VAXXED documentary at Tribeca Film Festival
came from the Nazi-linked Sloan Foundation, headed by CFR member Paul Joskow

Monday, March 28, 2016
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
http://www.naturalnews.com/images/authors/MikeAdams.jpg

http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/articles/Alred-P-Sloan-Foundation-eugenics-depopulation-640.jpg

‘As the story on the censorship of the VAXXED documentary continues to unfold,
we are learning that Robert De Niro was pressured by none other than the Sloan
Foundation in New York to blacklist the independent documentary.

The Sloan Foundation is so named from Alfred P. Sloan, a Nazi collaborator and
eugenics depopulation promoter. It’s no coincidence that his own beliefs on using
medical interventions to reduce race-targeted populations coincides perfectly with
the stated depopulation goals of Bill Gates (whose financial web of influence is
woven across the entire vaccine propaganda landscape).

What led me to connect the dots on this is a short piece from Celia Farber of
The Turth Barrier, who originally noticed the Sloan Foundation link.’

Read more: Pressure to censor VAXXED documentary at Tribeca Film Festival
came from the Nazi-linked Sloan Foundation, headed by CFR member Paul Joskow

http://www.naturalnews.com/053449_Tribeca_Film_Festival_Sloan_Foundation_eugenics_and_depopulation.html

[Cidersomerset]

Vaxxed, Wakefield and Deniro

OHZFF6NzL3I

Published on 26 Mar 2016

Vaxxed, Wakefield and Deniro - It's Not Complicated

Why did Robert de Niro's Tribeca festival dump "Vaxxed" by Andy Wakefield?

Because it's not that ****ing complicated to understand that vaccines cause autism.
http://www.vaxxedthemovie.com/
http://thinkingmomsrevolution.com/una...
http://adventuresinautism.blogspot.co...
http://www.houseofnumbers.com/site2/a...
http://www.omsj.org/blogs/what-is-a-p...
Please support actual independent science journalism by buying a book:

Chapter 5: Vaccines. Chapter 6: HIV

[Hervé]

Medical truth canceled due to Hollywood
(https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/03/28/medical-truth-canceled-due-to-hollywood/)
by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Mar28 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/03/28/medical-truth-canceled-due-to-hollywood/), 2016

Medical truth canceled due to Hollywood

Medical mind-control in the film industry

Movie stars don’t need to be threatened with physical harm to make them knuckle under

—This article is based on my 35 years living in Los Angeles. I knew many people in and around the movie industry. At ground level, I learned a few important facts about the medical cartel-Hollywood connection. When was the last time you saw a major film that attacked the medical system head-on? Never? Do you think that’s an accident?

The film, Vaxxed (trailer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdCU2DfMBpU)), suddenly canceled at the Tribeca Film Festival (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/03/27/the-vaccine-film-robert-deniro-wont-let-his-audience-see/), prompted this article, but I’m not writing here about Tribeca or Robert De Niro (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/03/27/vaxxed-how-did-they-threaten-robert-de-niro/) or that film (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/03/28/vaxxed-the-abc-news-interview-that-big-pharma-didnt-want-you-to-see/). This is background, and people need to understand it.

Long ago, when I was working on medical fraud stories, I discovered that Hollywood stars aren’t permitted to go up against the medical establishment, if they want to keep their careers.

In fact, these stars are recruited by Big Pharma, not just to do commercials, but to front for foundations that are themselves fronts for drug companies.

And to take it even further, stars are enticed into seeking elite medical treatment for their physical problems, as a way of making them “part of the team.” They meet famous doctors and researchers. They’re given red-carpet treatment. They’re bamboozled into believing they’re getting the best care on the cutting edge of medical science. They’re cut and pasted to keep their faces young.

There is history here as well. Legendary studio heads and producers shelled out money to build wings on hospitals bearing their names. They endowed chairs at medical schools. They funded research. They took great pride in being associated with (and praised for) their connection to something more than fantasies put up on movie screens. Their wealth was being directed and channeled into a singular “humanitarian” cause, out of hundreds of possible causes. This was no accident. This was the result of hard work by medical operatives on the ground. This was a network that fed off of Hollywood dollars. And it still does.

Big Hollywood and Big Medicine meet in an unholy embrace.

And here is the kicker. At the most basic level, all this is happening because the medical cartel considers celebrities “wild cards.” Who knows what these celebs will do or say? A stray remark from a world-famous actor could reveal a number of corrupt lies. He could torpedo miles and miles and miles of carefully laid PR groundwork that has taken decades to install.

Suppose, for example, a massively popular celeb told a gaggle of reporters, at a press conference, “Hey, guess what I just found out? The medical system in America kills 225,000 people a year (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2009/12/09/an-exclusive-interview-with-dr-barbara-starfield-medically-caused-death-in-america/).” And suppose he reached into his pocket and produced the study that proves it (http://www.drug-education.info/documents/iatrogenic.pdf)?

Celebrities are wild cards.

They have to learn the unspoken rules.

So we’re not just talking about Big Pharma and its allies taking a friendly interest in the industry that makes movies. No, this is an effort to control a territory, make it their own, dominate it, and keep the lid on.

The medical cartel keeps an electronic fence around Hollywood.

Ditto for the music business and big-time sports.

All the alternative news about predictive programming in Hollywood, and Satanic influences, and secret-society symbols flashed onscreen? Well, move over a few feet and you’ll bump into the medical control apparatus, a truly sinister force, when you know how much damage the medical system does.

This is what’s going on, and you should know it.

There is considerable fear that can be invoked in Hollywood stars, who believe their health depends on receiving “the very best medical treatment” when it’s needed. That belief is the target of mind control.

“Hey, Frank [movie star], do you remember last year when I treated you at four in the morning? You were in a panic. And now you’re going to turn against us in the press? Against your doctors? You’ve been ‘reading some studies’? What the hell is wrong with you?”

It doesn’t have to be said. The implication is there. The star wilts at the prospect of biting the hand he thinks is feeding him and even keeping him alive.

Twenty-five years ago, I watched career of a rising Hollywood actor turn sideways, stall, and then sink like a stone. I had a conversation with him. He told me many things. He had raised red flags with a few remarks he made about the FDA certifying dangerous medical drugs as safe. He had spoken about falsified medical research. He was looking over a script about corrupt research—a script that was, of course, never made into a movie. He was speaking with friends about unnecessary surgeries at a famous hospital. And then he was gone. It was as if he never existed. It wasn’t just his vanishing career that bothered him. People in the industry were afraid of being associated with him. Subtly, step by step, people around him were “seeing me in a different way.” That was the worst part, he said. It was war by gradual attrition. The ground under his feet wasn’t solid anymore.

Fortunately, he was a strong person. He was able to re-establish his life (outside of the film business and the acting business). But, he said, if he hadn’t been strong, if he hadn’t continued to “know what I know,” he would have had a very serious problem. He told me that even major stars could receive the kind of excommunication he was dealt—and the gradual drip-drip of shunning could wreck them personally.

“Very few actors,” he said, “have strength, regardless of the roles they play on the screen. They have a weakness. It can be played on.”

Insecurity, at various levels, is the name of the Hollywood game. Almost no one is immune.

Los Angeles is full of people hanging around on the fringes of the movie industry. Some of them, once employed, have been waiting for years, even decades, to land a new job. They barely stay afloat. They hope. They dream. They drink.

I met a producer who hadn’t worked on a film for 20 years. He was suffering from a number of physical conditions. I spoke with him about a script that laid out the launching of a phony epidemic that didn’t really exist, but was being promoted to the hilt by the CDC. It was as if I’d touched him with a cattle prod. After he recovered, he looked at me as if I were the devil incarnate, in his house to drag him down into Hell. He told me I was crazy, a film like that would never be made, and if he associated himself with a project like this he’d be blacklisted. I gently informed him that he hadn’t been active in the business for a long time. It doesn’t make any difference, he said. I’ll be laughed out of town. Nobody knows me anymore, but I’ll be the butt of jokes. My doctor will jump all over me. He went on for a quite a while. Was he just being paranoid? I asked him that. He shook his head. You don’t understand, he said. The medical establishment has its hooks into the movie industry. He told me he knew that, way back when he was active as a producer. For God’s sake, he said, his boss was on the board of a big hospital. He had given large sums to a university medical school. “The friggin’ guy think he’s a medical expert. He’s going to let me make a movie about big-time medical fraud? He’d run me over with his car first.”

A few years ago, I had a meeting with a fledgling producer. I showed him a story idea based on the premise of secret evidence in the medical arena: doctors in America were killing a few hundred thousand people every year with medicines and mistreatment in hospitals. (Of course, this evidence is real, and I’ve cited it many times in these pages.) The producer looked at me and said, “Yeah, you told me on the phone about this story. I just wanted to see what a crazy person looks like.” He was a congenial fellow, and we talked for an hour or so. He assured me that his career would be over if he ever got serious about raising money for the script I had in mind. “As soon as money comes into it,” he said, “the word gets out. People know what the movie is about. They disappear on you and don’t return your calls. They tell their friends, and then you’re toast.”

Finally, I spoke, not too long ago, with a man I’d call a medical fundraiser. He operates in and around the movie industry. He siphons $$ from famous people for medical causes. I wanted to see his reaction, so I told him I had a script about medically caused murder in America. Widespread murder. He looked at me and slowly smiled. He shook his head. He said, “You’re yanking my chain, right? I’ll put up my house against a dollar from you and bet the movie will never be made.” I played along and asked him why he was willing to make the bet. He said, “We and the movie people sleep in the same bed. We’re happily married for a long time. Now you’re going to come in and tell one of us the other has been cheating and you want to publicize that to the ****ing sky. How do you think we’re going to react?”

The medical cartel and Hollywood. An unholy embrace.

It’s very real and it isn’t an accident, any more than the CIA overthrowing a foreign leader is an accident. Like all major ops, the deep medical incursion into Hollywood has been planned and executed for a long time.

Revealed on no screens anywhere.

You can go higher and higher on the chain of power to see how this op works and who is running it, but at ground level, where the actors and agents and producers and directors live and work and hope, they are kept in check. They know it. They won’t talk about it publicly, but they know. They know where the electronic fence is and they can see the signs. They don’t go through the fence. They don’t climb it. They don’t go around it. They pretend it isn’t there, but they know it is.

They know how to be selectively blind.

Jon Rappoport

---------------------------------------------


The only widely known quote about medical institutions that survived:



"A Hospital is no place to be sick."


Samuel Goldwyn (http://www.quotationspage.com/quotes/Samuel_Goldwyn/) US (Polish-born) movie producer (1882 - 1974)

[onawah]

Note especially the list of deadly side effects of the MMR vaccine.

The vaccine in Vaxxed: so pure, angels sent it for your kiddies
3/29/16
by Jon Rappoport
The vaccine in Vaxxed: so pure, angels sent it for your kiddies


Whatever happens in a doctor’s office must be good, right?

Don’t worry, be happy, angels brought the MMR vaccine to Earth so doctors could shoot your kiddies with it.

The film, Vaxxed, which has been axed from the Tribeca Film Festival, is all about the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) vaccine.

Long-time CDC researcher, Bill Thompson, publicly admitted he and his colleagues committed gross fraud, to make the vaccine seem safe, to pretend it had no connection to autism, when it did. They lied. That’s what Vaxxed is about.

So pardon me, but I thought I’d offer some quotes about MMR. Just to keep you in the loop.

“In 1977, 34 new cases of measles were reported on the campus of UCLA, in a population that was supposedly 91% immune, according to careful serological testing. Another 20 cases of measles were reported in the Pecos, New Mexico, area within a period of a few months in 1981, and 75% of them had been fully immunized, some of them quite recently. A survey of sixth-graders in a well-immunized urban community revealed that about 15% of this age group are still susceptible to rubella, a figure essentially identical with that of the pre-vaccine era.” Richard Moskowitz, MD, The Case Against Immunizations, 1983, American Institute of Homeopathy.

At the excellent site, thinktwice.com, long-time vaccine investigator and author, Neil Z Miller, has assembled an impressive cache of information about the MMR vaccine. Here are a few highlights:

“The drug company that makes the MMR vaccine publishes an extensive list of warnings, contraindications, and adverse reactions associated with this triple shot. These may be found in the vaccine package insert available from any doctor giving MMR, and in the Physician’s Desk Reference (PDR) at the library. The following afflictions affecting nearly every body system — blood, lymphatic, digestive, cardiovascular, immune, nervous, respiratory, and sensory — have been reported following receipt of the MMR shot: encephalitis, encephalopathy, neurological disorders, seizure disorders, convulsions, learning disabilities, subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE), demyelination of the nerve sheaths, Guillain-Barre’ syndrome (paralysis), muscle incoordination, deafness, panniculitis, vasculitis, optic neuritis (including partial or total blindness), retinitis, otitis media, bronchial spasms, fever, headache, joint pain, arthritis (acute and chronic), transverse myelitis, thrombocytopenia (blood clotting disorders and spontaneous bleeding), anaphylaxis (severe allergic reactions), lymphadenopathy, leukocytosis, pneumonitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, erythema multiforme, urticaria, pancreatitis, parotitis, inflammatory bowel disease, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, meningitis, diabetes, autism, immune system disorders, and death.”

More from Neil Miller: “This section contains unsolicited adverse reaction reports associated with the MMR vaccine. They are typical of the daily emails received by the ThinkTwice Global Vaccine Institute:

[MMR114] My 12-month-old received his MMR shot on a Friday. The following Friday he had a 104 degree temperature and became violently ill. The doctor said it was a stomach virus. But on Monday morning he woke up with a rash all over. I took him to the doctor and was very upset to learn that this is very common.

[MMR128] Recently, my 13-month-old had his MMR. He now has constant high fevers and seizures, which he never had. He is a totally different boy. This is devastating.

[MMR176] My friend’s 15-month-old daughter received an MMR vaccine. Within eight days she was hospitalized with a 104 degree fever and a skin rash. My friend called to see what I could find out about Stevens-Johnson syndrome. They told her that her daughter may die as a result of this.

[MMR203] A dear friend lost her 15-month old daughter two weeks after her MMR. She was healthy and showed no signs of illness yet died suddenly in her sleep one afternoon. The post mortem revealed a viral infection and traces of pneumonia, but her mother and I find it very hard to believe that the vaccination wasn’t to blame.

[MMR216] Three days ago my friend’s 15-month-old daughter was hospitalized after experiencing a high fever and her first seizure. The hospital put the baby through a series of tests, including a CAT scan and CBC. My friend told me he thought it was a reaction to the MMR vaccine she recently received. However, the doctors were puzzled as to the cause and disallowed this explanation.

[MMR315] When my daughter was just over one year old, she received her MMR vaccination. Later that day she had a high fever, and I put her to bed. I was busy doing housework downstairs and got this “mother’s intuition” that something was wrong. I rushed upstairs to find her blue and not breathing. I called a nurse. My daughter seemed to be convulsing, so I was instructed to reach down her throat to open her air passage. She was rushed to the hospital and they immediately put her into a cool bath. She was in the hospital for almost a week. Had it not been for my gut feeling that something was wrong, my baby would not be with me today.

[MMR317] Our son developed seizures after his MMR vaccine at 14 months. Today, after two years of anti-epilepsy medications, he has totally regressed. We decided to stop all medications five weeks ago and his grand mal fits have stopped. We are now left with a child experiencing severe constipation and bowel problems.

[MMR321] One week after the MMR shot for my 16-month-old daughter, she had diarrhea. The next day she had three seizures. What steps should be taken once a reaction has occurred. I want to be sure it is documented and the government is made aware.

[MMR398] My daughter had a serious reaction to the MMR shot when she was 22 months. She developed brain damage after a fever of 106 degrees. She also has seizures which are unresponsive to medication, damage to the nerves of her eyes, and learning disabilities that she battles every day. We took her case to court and lost. The doctor who testified on their behalf stated that the government only called him in when they wanted a finding in their favor. What a setup! Of course they don’t have to live with the frustrations and expense of raising these vaccine-damaged children.

[MMR402] Three days after my daughter received her MMR vaccine, she started blinking her eyes and sniffling a lot. She’s been doing this for 2 1/2 months now. Is there a link between the MMR vaccine and facial tics?

[MMR436] My 12-year-old had a seizure within 10 minutes of his second MMR. His head rolled side to side and his arms jerked a couple of times. He was unaware of this, so he must have blanked out. Afterwards, he felt woozy, very tired, and had a headache at the bridge of his nose. Also, his arm that got the shot was numb. The feeling in it gradually returned over the course of an hour.

[MMR443] I have a 15-year-old daughter. I recently moved to the U.S. from the U.K. without her medical records. Upon arrival we were required to give her complete immunizations. I strongly objected, but felt pushed into re-immunization because of state laws to get her into school. After her second MMR she has been complaining of dizzy spells and continuous headaches. Is there a link between over-immunization of MMR and this sickness?

[MMR509] Today, shortly after I was inoculated with the MMR vaccine, I began feeling faint and short of breath. After ten minutes of holding my head between my knees in a dirty gas station bathroom, I decided I could drive the 20 miles home.

[MMR518] I had an MMR shot about three year ago and have suffered from many reactions to this vaccine since.

[MMR552] When I was a child I was given the MMR vaccine. Almost seven days to the hour I became ill: fever, sweats, throwing up even the slightest amount of fluid or food. This went on for a month or so. The doctors would not even consider that the shots caused the illness. Later, they wanted me to have the second MMR; my parents refused. The doctors went through the usual tantrums and said I wouldn’t be able to attend school. When my parents said ‘Fine, he won’t go,’ the doctors gave in. At about the age of 18, I had a blood screening and was told I didn’t have all of the MMR vaccine. Forgetting the episode as a child, I let them give me the shot. Seven days later I was sick again, but not as severe.

[MMR580] My college refused to admit me without an MMR vaccine. I had a terrible reaction and was rushed to the hospital with piercing screams, a high temperature and delirium. Now I have trouble focusing, and can be scattered and forgetful. I can’t stand change and don’t seem to have the energy and drive that I once had. My family thinks I developed obsessive-compulsive disorder. I am very bright, but nearly blew my scholarship after the shot.

[MMR588] I was told by the nursing school where I am enrolled, “No vaccine, no school.” Even though I had all the normal vaccines as a child, I was unable to show this. Five days after I received the MMR vaccine, I was so ill that I ended up in the emergency room. The doctor told me that the MMR did not cause my sickness, and my nursing school supervisor said it was a virus. Why does the medical establishment deny vaccine reactions? Why can’t they tell us this important information and let us make educated responsible decisions. The irony is that I got the vaccine and now I’m so sick that I can’t go to school.

—-But all the quotes I’m giving you in this article—they must be wrong. They must be. The authorities know what they’re doing. They always do. Of course. They would never feed us false information. Everything is good. How could it not be good?

Don’t worry, be happy.

Never listen to mothers of those children who end up with brain damage after getting a vaccine shot. All these mothers must be lying. Of course they are. They don’t actually care deeply about their own children. Right?

Sure. Keep dreaming. Keep dreaming. Keep dreaming.

[onawah]

Breaking: Vaxxed: the spell is broken: Angelika Theater will screen it in NYC!

https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/03/29/breaking-vaxxed-the-film-you-cant-see-will-be-screened-in-new-york/
Breaking…Vaxxed, the film you can’t see, will be screened in New York!
3/29/16
by Jon Rappoport

Breaking… I’ve just been informed that Vaxxed, the film about the vaccine-autism connection you can’t see…is now booked at the Angelika Film Center in New York.

It will start screening this Friday, April 1, and go through the next Thurs.

If you live anywhere near NY, get there and see it. Help pack the house. END THE CENSORSHIP.

Promo links:

* Angelika’s Vaxxed page https://www.angelikafilmcenter.com/nyc/film/vaxxed-from-cover-up-to-catastrophe/

[enfoldedblue]

The Healthy Home Economist suggests that this whole thing could have been a publicity stunt by DeNiro to promote a film that he knew would never be allowed to be screened at the festival.


The Tribeca Film Festival was in the news in a big way in recent days when festival co-founder and celebrity actor Robert De Niro caused a media firestorm with his controversial decision to screen the documentary VAXXED.

VAXXED is a film is about the Centers for Disease Control’s involvement and cover-up of research demonstrating a causal relationship between the Measles-Mumps-Rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism, most prominently in African-American boys.








Dr. William Thompson, the Senior CDC Scientist who led the agency’s 2004 study on the MMR vaccine and its link to autism revealed the cover-up to Environmental Biologist Brian Hooker PhD in a series of taped phone conversations.

Robert De Niro’s original defense of the film apparently occurred after a one-hour conversation with United States Congressman Bill Posey (R-FL), who has interacted directly and at length with Dr. Thompson and whose legal team has scrutinized the documents that prove fraud at the CDC.

De Niro stated the following in defense of his decision to award VAXXED a coveted spot on the Tribeca line-up:


Grace and I have a child with autism and we believe it is critical that all of the issues surrounding the causes of autism be openly discussed and examined. In the 15 years since the Tribeca Film Festival was founded, I have never asked for a film to be screened or gotten involved in the programming. However this is very personal to me and my family and I want there to be a discussion, which is why we will be screening VAXXED. I am not personally endorsing the film, nor am I anti-vaccination; I am only providing the opportunity for a conversation around the issue.



Then, abruptly, Mr. De Niro changed his mind, stating the following the very next day:


My intent in screening this film was to provide an opportunity for conversation around an issue that is deeply personal to me and my family. But after reviewing it over the past few days with the Tribeca Film Festival team and others from the scientific community, we do not believe it contributes to or furthers the discussion I had hoped for.





The Festival doesn’t seek to avoid or shy away from controversy. However, we have concerns with certain things in this film that we feel prevent us from presenting it in the Festival program. We have decided to remove it from our schedule.

While De Niro has been accused of being a flip flopper, I am not so sure.

De Niro is no dummy and as a celebrity for many decades, is clearly an expert at “working” the media to his advantage. He surely knew far in advance the huge brouhaha that would be caused by his decision to award VAXXED a coveted position on the Tribeca screening lineup and make a big announcement about it.
more (http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com/de-niro-pulls-vaxxed-from-tribeca-cop-out-or-brilliant-marketing/)

[Catsquotl]

So now that Vaxxed has received some love and is on the radar so to speak.
When will it be made available through respectable sources on the interweb?

Since a lot of people are now aware this movie exists. It should be streamed on some website so everyone can go see it and make up their minds one would think.

Anyway it will be shown at the Angelica film center in NYC on april 1st.
And there's a mailadres for non-consumer sales inquiry or screening options at
http://www.vaxxedthemovie.com/

With Love
Eelco

[Cidersomerset]

NYC Attorney Patricia Finn On Suing Vaccine Makers & Andy Wakefield's Film "Vaxxed!"

XJlLEj5w944

Published on 30 Mar 2016

Please Support The Show – http://richieallen.co.uk/

[Deega]

I don't know if the follow-up by the Producer of Vaxxed had been seen here, starting at 1,42 seconds, very interesting!

tvcdh7KlgPI

[onawah]

Dr. Wakefield was vindicated for that so-called "faulty" study that caused him to be stripped of his medical credential.
Funny how the lamestream media keeps on getting that wrong.

See:
http://www.naturalnews.com/048753_Wakefield_study_MMR_vaccine_autism.html
https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/04/14/dr-andrew-wakefield-not-guilty-says-bbc-general-medical-council-wrong/
http://www.ebcala.org/areas-of-law/vaccine-law/co-author-of-lancet-mmr-autism-study-exonerated-on-all-charges-of-professional-misconduct
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/03/26/dr-wakefield-vaccine-film.aspx

Hopefully now that will have to come out.
And perhaps that was part of DeNiro's strategy, if he actually planned for this brouhaha.

[Cidersomerset]

Big Pharma goes all-out with massive increase in lobbying
of U.S. lawmakers to protect drug price monopolies

By David on 31 March 2016 GMT

https://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/906322_10152351433698842_4412755217748094135_o-1-2.jpg


-------------------------------------------------------------------------

NATURAL NEWS......

Big Pharma goes all-out with massive increase in lobbying
of U.S. lawmakers to protect drug price monopolies

Thursday, March 31, 2016 by: Julie Wilson staff writer
Tags: Big Pharma, political lobbying, drug price monopolies


http://www.naturalnews.com/gallery/640/Government/Whitehouse.jpg

‘The long, drawn-out political circus that accompanies a presidential
election can be exhausting to say the least, especially when, as usual,
the candidates are far from representing the public’s needs and wants.

But thanks to social media and alternative news outlets, some genuinely
important matters have made their way to the surface and served as
talking points among this year’s 2016 presidential candidates, i.e.
unwarranted and unethical price hikes on pharmaceutical drugs.

Nearly all of the candidates have commented on Big Pharma’s ugly practice
of hiking up the price on important life-saving drugs, but regardless of
whether or not those statements are rhetorical in nature is a moot point,
because now, the issue is front and center.’

Read more: Big Pharma goes all-out with massive increase in lobbying of
U.S. lawmakers to protect drug price monopolies


http://www.naturalnews.com/053499_Big_Pharma_political_lobbying_drug_price_monopolies.html

[happyexpat]

And THIS is the exact type of thing that makes alternative media look stupid.

Who says Robert de Niro is the one who cancelled the screening ? He was one of the founders and he specifically said it is the first time he has ever specifically asked for a film to be screened.

There are other people involved, not just him.

[onawah]

A short video of Dr. Andrew Wakefield speaking here:
9YemrBxiap8
speaking at a conference here:
Vf3yXk4oJPs


Dr. Wakefield was vindicated for that so-called "faulty" study that caused him to be stripped of his medical credential.
Funny how the lamestream media keeps on getting that wrong.

See:
http://www.naturalnews.com/048753_Wakefield_study_MMR_vaccine_autism.html
https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/04/14/dr-andrew-wakefield-not-guilty-says-bbc-general-medical-council-wrong/
http://www.ebcala.org/areas-of-law/vaccine-law/co-author-of-lancet-mmr-autism-study-exonerated-on-all-charges-of-professional-misconduct
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/03/26/dr-wakefield-vaccine-film.aspx

Hopefully now that will have to come out.
And perhaps that was part of DeNiro's strategy, if he actually planned for this brouhaha.

[Hervé]

Why Vaxxed was shot down at Tribeca—up close and personal
(https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/why-vaxxed-was-shot-down-at-tribeca-up-close-and-personal/)
by (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/why-vaxxed-was-shot-down-at-tribeca-up-close-and-personal/)Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Apr8 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/04/08/why-vaxxed-was-shot-down-at-tribeca-up-close-and-personal/), 2016

The answer? Jane Rosenthal (https://twitter.com/janetribeca) and her (ex (http://pagesix.com/2016/03/22/tribeca-film-fest-founders-put-dakota-co-op-on-the-market-for-39m/)) husband, Craig Hatkoff (https://twitter.com/chatkoff).

That’s my opinion, my story, and I’m sticking to it.

Yes, there were other pressures on Robert De Niro. I know all about them. But Jane Rosenthal and her husband Craig are very, very tight with De Niro.

How tight?

From Crain’s New York Business 2007: “Jane Rosenthal is the business brains behind the wheel of New York’s most famous taxi driver: Robert De Niro. The duo, who founded Tribeca Productions in 1989, has produced 22 movies.

“Perhaps Ms. Rosenthal’s most important contribution to the city, however, came in the wake of the Sept. 11 attacks. She and Mr. De Niro, along with Ms. Rosenthal’s husband, real estate financier Craig Hatkoff, launched the Tribeca Film Festival to help revive downtown.”

Getting the picture?

Now, moving along: Jane Rosenthal’s husband, Craig Hatkoff, sits on the board of the NYU Child Study Center in New York—and that major, major Center is deeply involved in the research, study, and treatment of child psychiatric disorders. In case you’ve forgotten, autism is officially listed as a psychiatric disorder.

The NYU Center would never, ever, in a million years imagine that vaccines could cause autism. If they did imagine it, they’d shut up and march straight ahead with their brain imaging studies and other mainstream distractions.

The NYU Child Study Center is surrounded by important names. Among past Center honorees: Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg; Governor George E. Pataki; Whoopi Goldberg; Former Mayor Rudolph Giuliani; Senator Hillary Clinton.

Among the attendees at a 2008 Center awards dinner, which raised $8.8 million, and was hosted by CBS News anchor Katie Couric: New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine; real estate mogul Larry Silverstein; and of course, the Tribeca founders, Jane Rosenthal and Craig Hatkoff.

The Rosenthal-Hatkoff duo have been on the scene at a number of Center fundraisers and awards dinners. They’re active. They’re visible. They’re players.

Here is a statement from the NYU Child Center’s website:
“At the Child Study Center, the Center for Neurodevelopmental Disorders (CND) is committed to research in neurodevelopmental disorders, leveraging establish[ed] strengths in Autism Spectrum Disorder, ADHD and animal studies on early development, as well as collaborating closely with our clinical partners.” The Center has an Autism Spectrum Disorders Clinical and Research Program, where it carries out orthodox and “cutting edge” work on autism.

And the Center is expanding. This is a big-time operation:


“The NYU Child Study Center has three main affiliates: the Nathan S. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (NKI), Rockland Children’s Psychiatric Center (RCPC), and Bellevue Hospital Center.

“Through collaborative efforts, these organizations work with the NYU Child Study Center to integrate the highest level of clinical care, ground-breaking research, and training for the next generation of leaders in child and adolescent mental health. In addition, the diverse locations open the doors to treatment for families in Westchester, Rockland and Putnam Counties; as well as throughout New York City.

“With the partnerships among these world-class institutions, we are establishing a new multidisciplinary model for advancing the prevention, identification and treatment of child psychiatric disorders on a national scale.” A film that claims to show a link between the MMR vaccine and autism would be a hideous affront to the NYU Child Study Center, where Craig Hatkoff, co-founder of the Tribeca Film Festival, sits on the Board.

A plan to actually show Vaxxed at the Tribeca Festival, which Hatkoff and Rosenthal co-founded, would be a blow to the face of the NYU Center.

New York, like other big cities, operates across a level of wealth and influence that relies on social connections. Heavy connections.

In New York, money, real estate, Wall Street, politics, the arts, the medical hierarchy are all joined socially. At the hip.

Jane Rosenthal and her husband, Hatkoff, are definitely part of that mix. There was no way Rosenthal was going to let that film on the screen at Tribeca. It would have mangled many of her social relationships.

Then there is this: The NYU Child Study Center depends on a great deal of funding from the National Institute for Mental Health (NIMH).

So it could have gone this way. A player at NIMH calls the NYU Center; “I understand the Tribeca film Festival is going to show an insane film about vaccines causing autism. Craig Hatkoff, Jane Rosenthal’s husband, sits on your Board. Talk to the man. Straighten him out. Get him to come to his senses. What’s next? Is Tribeca going to sponsor a positive film about gun-toting militias taking over three Western states?”

That’s the way things happen.

Meanwhile, the CDC and the Sloan Foundation were making their pitches to shut down the film, but there is a strong probability those efforts were passing through Hatkoff or Rosenthal, too, because they’re very close to De Niro, and he was the one who needed to be convinced.

Have a look at this recent FOX 5 NY interview (http://www.fox5ny.com/news/118067920-video), where De Niro and Rosenthal sit side by side. She looks for all the world like a “minder,” as the British would say. A gatekeeper. A worried monitor, keeping tabs on De Niro. He mentions that he still thinks the film should be shown, but not at Tribeca. She makes sure to emphasize that the film is not going to be shown at Tribeca, in case anyone has misinterpreted De Niro’s remarks.

She looks exhausted, as if she’s had some sleepless nights, as if she’s thinking: “How many of my New York friends do I have to apologize to before this is over? I can’t blame Bob, he’s my friend and partner, so I just shrug and say, ‘Thank goodness we’re moving on.’ But will they look at me the same way after this disaster? Will things be the same? I never wanted to accept that goddamn film in the first place. I told Bob it was a mistake. And the people at the NYU Center. What am I supposed to do about them?”

The lesson for De Niro? Don’t mess with New York money.

Don’t try to stop the New York medical juggernaut.

Against this force, he was a bit player in a hurricane.

For a minute, he stood up for the film, and because he was famous, he almost landed a leading role in a production called, Exposing the Truth about Vaccines Causing Autism. But the project was quickly squashed.

It took an independent theater chain in the city, the Angelika, to step up to the plate and screen Vaxxed (trailer (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdCU2DfMBpU)). However, the Angelika doesn’t have a thousandth of the clout of the Tribeca Film Festival.

The upside? Jane Rosenthal and her husband, Craig Hatkoff, don’t sit on Angelika’s Board.

Jon Rappoport

[onawah]

See also my post here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?89919-VAXXED-shut-down-by-the-Mayor--s-Office-in-Houston&p=1059328&viewfull=1#post1059328

[Curious77]

Yes -- there's that -- but also the Tribecca Film Festival is sponsored by The Sloan Foundation --
and one of its Trustees is president of Merck.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

by the way, the Angelika Theater in New York did show the film VAXXED during that week to enthusiastic
crowds -- and I understand that it has been extended for another week.

There was also to be a showing at a Houston, Tx theater but that was cancelled by the Mayor of the town.

Of course, we need to see this film -- Netflix I think has it -- and I'd like to buy it.

We need to encourage other theaters across the states to show it.

[Linderlou]

My personal take on this? Mr. De Niro is a very smart man and media savvy. His canceling of the film (or allowing it to be canceled) without releasing details garnered national media attention... probably more so than if the film played quietly at the Tribeca Film festival. Well played!

[Cidersomerset]

There is one positive out of the doc being pulled , it certainly got a lot more
publicity than any of the other 100 odd docs screened during the festival....

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert De Niro denounces medical totalitarians: 'Let the people see VAXXED'
and decide for themselves what the evidence shows

By David on 14 April 2016 GMT Medical/Health

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NATURAL NEWS.....

Robert De Niro denounces medical totalitarians: 'Let the people see VAXXED'
and decide for themselves what the evidence shows

Thursday, April 14, 2016
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Tags: Robert De Niro, vaccine debate, VAXXED documentary

FJ7iPn39i08
Robert-DeNiro-Vaccines-Today-Show

‘Under fire for pulling the VAXXED documentary from the Tribeca Film Festival —
after being pressured by pharma-funded media trolls and the Nazi-linked Sloan
Foundation — Robert De Niro has taken a stand for public debate about vaccines
and autism. In a widely cited Today Show interview, De Niro exclaimed it’s time to
“find out the truth, let’s just find out the truth [about vaccines and autism].”

Robert De Niro was at first hailed by the autism community for his courage to show
the film, which tells the story of CDC whistleblower Dr. William Thompson, who
openly admitted to taking part in altering scientific data at the CDC to hide statistical
links between vaccines and autism.’

Read more: Robert De Niro denounces medical totalitarians: ‘Let the people see
VAXXED’ and decide for themselves what the evidence shows

http://www.naturalnews.com/053651_Robert_De_Niro_vaccine_debate_VAXXED_documentary.html

[onawah]

Vaccine damage, the hidden truth
4/17/16 by Jon Rappoport
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/04/17/vaccine-damage-the-hidden-truth/


Warning: Don’t read this article if you want to avoid feeling an unpleasant sensation in the pit of your stomach.

The issue here is: refusing to believe an uncomfortable fact.

An unpleasant fact.

A devastating fact.

There is a simple formula that describes how the public refuses to believe an uncomfortable fact.

It goes this way:

“Well, if that were true, then…”

It’s a statement that suggests a person is standing at the edge of a cliff. And if he accepted some particularly unpleasant fact, he’d suddenly fall off.

Another way to look at it: if he accepted this fact, it would lead, by contagion, to him admitting there were other very uncomfortable truths. And then, by extension, like branches quickly growing out of a tree, a whole host of multiplying shocks would become known.

So it is, in the area of vaccines.

The experts, like preening peacocks, assure us that the shots are amazingly safe. After all, they’ve done the studies. They’ve published the studies.

There is widespread fraud in those reports, because, for example, of the short follow-up period—as if adverse effects could only occur in a 72-hour window, or over the course of a few weeks. Who decided that? Who made that arbitrary rule?

And then, most importantly, studies are not real life. We have seen glowing assessments of medical drugs in print, but when they are (like Vioxx) released for public use, people start dropping like flies.

In the case of vaccines (in real life), the one system for reporting human damage is broken. Completely broken. It’s called VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. It’s run by the CDC and the FDA. (My readers are aware of how many crimes and lies I’ve laid at the door of those two august agencies.)

Who can make a report of an adverse vaccine-reaction? A parent, a doctor, a nurse, a nurse practitioner. You can see the problems right away.

How many parents even know the VAERS system exists? How many parents have the knowledge or the will to follow through and submit a report? How many parents will dare to suspect that a vaccine has injured their children? How many doctors or nurses who administer vaccinations are eager to report cases of children who incur obvious brain damage from the shot THEY GAVE?

So…for doctors and medical experts to claim vaccines are safe in the real world? They’re pretending they know what they don’t know. They’re faking it.

But if that were true, then…

That’s right. If that were true, we would have no proof that vaccines are safe.

Therefore, when the government advises and nudges and even demands that people line up for vaccinations, the government is in the dark about safety. Completely in the dark.

But if that were true…

Then the entire population is at risk.

That’s right.

Let’s go back to those pre-marketing studies, which are done on vaccines in order to gain FDA approval. Who conducts the studies? The vaccine manufacturers. And who stands to profit from the sale of the vaccines? Ever heard of conflict of interest?

And have any studies been done to assess the risks of giving multiple vaccines? After all, the CDC schedule keeps getting longer and longer. I can find no evidence of well-formed clinical trials assessing the safety of shooting people in the arm with multiple vaccines. Does that seem like an oversight? A horrendous hole in the “science” of vaccination?

But if that’s true, then…

We would, again, have no proof that vaccination is safe.

Correct.

Now, from the historical record, we do have many, many disturbing examples of what has happened to people after vaccines have been approved. Here are just a few:

What about this? “Accidents may, however, follow the use of this so-called killed (rabies) vaccine owing to inadequate processing. A very serious occurrence of this sort occurred at Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil, in 1960. No fewer than 18 out of 66 persons vaccinated with Fermi’s carbolized (rabies) vaccine suffered from encephalomyelitis and every one of the eighteen died.” Sir Graham Wilson, Hazards of Immunization.

What about this? “Administration of KMV (killed measles vaccine) apparently set in motion an aberrant immunologic response that not only failed to protect children against natural measles, but resulted in heightened susceptibility.” JAMA Aug. 22, 1980, vol. 244, p. 804, Vincent Fulginiti and Ray Helfer. The authors indicate that such falsely protected children can come down with “an often severe, atypical form of measles. Atypical measles is characterized by fever, headache… and a diverse rash (which)… may consist of a mixture of macules, papules, vesicles, and pustules… ”

What about this? “… Based on the only U.S. findings on adverse DPT reactions, an FDA-financed study at the University of California, Los Angeles, one out of every 350 children will have a convulsion; one in 180 children will experience high-pitched screaming; and one in 66 will have a fever of 105 degrees or more.” Jennifer Hyman, Democrat and Chronicle, Rochester, New York, special supplement on DPT, dated April, 1987.

What about this? “A study undertaken in 1979 at the University of California, Los Angeles, under the sponsorship of the Food and Drug Administration, and which has been confirmed by other studies, indicates that in the U.S.A. approximately 1,000 infants die annually as a direct result of DPT vaccinations, and these are classified as SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) deaths. These represent about 10 to 15% of the total number of SIDS deaths occurring annually in the U.S.A. (between 8,000 and 10,000 depending on which statistics are used).” Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company Limited, Saffron Walden, Essex, England, 1987.

What about this? “Up to half of family doctors do not want to be vaccinated against swine flu. GPs will be first in the line for the jabs when they become available but many will decline, even though they will be offering the vaccine to their patients. More than two thirds of those who will turn the jab down believe it has not been tested enough. Most also believe the flu has turned out to be so mild in the vast majority of cases that the vaccine is not needed. Last night Government experts criticised GPs who decide not to have the jab, saying they will put vulnerable patients needlessly at risk. A week ago, a poll of nurses showed that a third would turn down the opportunity of being vaccinated against swine flu. News that medics are unconvinced by the need for a vaccine will cause grave concern to patients who will be invited for the jab over the next few months. A poll of doctors for Pulse magazine found that 49 per cent would reject the vaccine with 9 per cent undecided.” Daily Mail, 8/25/2009.

These few references to vaccine disasters are but a drop in the bucket, of course.

If these and other such references are true (and they are), then…

Doctors and medical bureaucrats are telling massive lies about the safety of vaccines. They aren’t just ignorant about safety.

Correct.

And if that’s true, then…

How can we trust these people?

How can we trust the major media outlets that give overwhelming support to these people?

We can’t.

When mothers tell the world that their children, after a shot, are never the same again, they aren’t “providing anecdotes,” contrasted with “scientific studies.” The mothers are giving us a much more reliable account of what vaccines are doing than the fakery of the “science.”

But if the mothers are right (and they are)…

And if the experts are lying through their teeth about vaccine safety (and they are)…

Then Reality is not what we’re told it is.

It’s the opposite of what we’re told.

And this isn’t merely an intellectual glitch.

Every day, lives are on the line.

Every single day.

I’ll leave you with a fantastical piece of “science” from the government VAERS website — VAERS Data page. It centers on the use of the word “coincidence.” If this doesn’t convince you that truth has been hijacked, I don’t know what will:

“More than 10 million vaccines per year are given to children less than 1 year old, usually between 2 and 6 months of age. At this age, infants are at greatest risk for certain medical adverse events, including high fevers, seizures, and sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). Some infants will experience these medical events shortly after a vaccination by coincidence.

“These coincidences make it difficult to know whether a particular adverse event resulted from a medical condition or from a vaccination.”

Do you see the diabolical criminal sophistry?

“Some infants will experience these medical events [seizures, death, etc.] shortly after a vaccination by coincidence.”

By coincidence.


Yes, you see, an hour after the baby was given the vaccine, he also contracted a raging case of meningitis, or his parents also, coincidently, fed him a poison, or a bio-warfare germ floated in the window and settled on his tongue, or a flash of light from a distant galaxy struck him in the eyes and blinded him. Therefore, reputable scientists are unable to determine whether the vaccine caused the damage.

This is what government scientists and bureaucrats are selling terrified grief-stricken parents whose child’s life has just been destroyed by a shot in the arm.

This is policy.

This is what you shouldn’t question, because if you do, you might experience an unpleasant sensation in the pit of your stomach.

“Yes, Your Honor, the child was standing in the middle of the street, and a car did come over the hill and strike him, but it would be a grievous mistake to assume the car caused the damage the child incurred. Something else could have happened at the same instant, something of which we’re unaware. I’m prepared to give the court a list of 50 possible other events…”

They, the scientists and the doctors and medical bureaucrats, are, indeed, prepared.

They’re fully prepared, without a shred of conscience, to explain how their attack on your child’s life had absolutely nothing to do with them.

Jon Rappoport

[Curious77]

Think Netflix has it but haven't had a chance to order and watch as yet --
I'd prefer to buy it, however -- but not finding anything enabling that goal as yet.

[onawah]

From The Greater Good team today:
http://www.vaxxedthemovie.com/?inf_contact_key=b997a648eb7e848619b554dd9e47ee5575465f8c36613e231d8533261536388c


There is an important new documentary out called VaXxed: From Controversy to Catastrophe. We highly recommend you see this film. It details the vast web of corruption at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the federal agency charged with protecting the public health.

The film portrays how a senior scientist from CDC blew the whistle and admitted that he and senior officials at CDC fraudulently altered the data of their own study to conceal their findings that MMR vaccine was linked to autism. They even went so far as to destroy the files to cover their tracks.

You may have heard about VaXxed as the famous TriBeCa Film Festival announced it would screen the film and Robert De Niro, festival co-founder and father of a son with autism, stated “we believe it is critical that all of the issues surrounding the causes of autism be openly discussed and examined."

Within hours of the announcement, dozens and dozens of news outlets around the globe attacked De Niro and the festival for screening the film using suspiciously uniform talking points. There was no discussion of the content of the film - allegations of gross fraud and corruption at CDC - there was only an attack of the filmmaker, Dr. Andrew Wakefield.

Dr. Wakefield has been called disgraced, a fraud, and much more but the truth is he's not. When Professor John Walker-Smith, Wakefield's boss and co-author of a now retracted paper, sued the British General Medical Council (GMC) over essentially the same charges levied against Wakefield, the British High Court fully exonerated Walker-Smith, a world renowned pediatric gastro-enterologist, and severely rebuked the GMC for its abuse of power.

The 'retracted" paper was never reinstated but it should have been. Instead, it has been used as an excuse to vilify Wakefield and distract away from the true scientific concerns about the dangers of vaccines.

Overnight, after the spate of vicious articles attacking TriBeCa, the festival relented and banned the film. What is most disgraceful is that these media outlets all pilloried the film and the festival without ever having viewed the film. This amounts to nothing more than ad hominem attacks and calls for censorship.

But DeNiro was not to be kept down. He appeared angry and at odds with his festival co-founder Jane Rosenthal when he appeared on the Today Show and expressed his genuine concern that there is something to the vaccine-autism link and that we need to find the truth. The interview is well worth watching.

Unfortunately, TriBeCa was not alone in censoring VaXxed. The Worldfest-Houston Film Festival soon announced it was being forced by the Houston Mayor's office to withdraw the film or lose $100,000 of dollars of grant money.

Then the Village Voice in NYC cancelled ads and sent out an email retraction following a paid email blast.

You have to wonder what is so frightening about the movie VaXxed that media outlets and officials across the country are forcing festivals to ban the film. When those in positions of power are able to exert that power to censor information uncomfortable to the powers that be, we have to reconsider just how free our country truly is. .

.
Find a screening near you
http://www.vaxxedthemovie.com/?inf_contact_key=b997a648eb7e848619b554dd9e47ee5575465f8c36613e231d8533261536388c

[onawah]

Vaccine fraud continues: Uncensored discussion by those behind VAXXED reveals CDC plan to ‘rework’ MMR data, dispel safety concerns
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/mmr-vaccine-fraud-1823.html
5jxujaa0wDE


Spurred on by the growing popularity of the documentary Vaxxed: From Cover-Up to Catastrophe, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is said to be planning a major campaign to dispel growing skepticism over safety of the MMR vaccine.
Those closest to the documentary have shared that they have strong reason to believe the CDC will release ‘reworked’ MMR research data and that the agency has bought off whistleblower Dr. William Thompson, who remains with the agency.
The forecast of a CDC propaganda machine is likely related to the failure of vaccination zealots to effectively repress the documentary. Instead of being censored into obscurity, the film has garnered growing attention. This unanticipated turn of events has likely served as the catalyst for the agency’s next move, which will not only include “reanalyzed” data, but a PR strategy to spoon-feed the “new” findings to the mainstream media and the public.
Panel experts warn of CDC’s next move to cover up link between autism and the MMR vaccine
Dr. William Thompson, subject of the documentary film, was the CDC whistleblower who publicly confessed to being a part of a scientific fraud at CDC to alter data linking vaccines to autism in African-American boys. Rather than silence the documentary, attempts at censorship by vaccine stakeholders have served only to build awareness of the documentary’s significance.
Following the recent showing of Vaxxed at the Manhattan Film Festival, those closely involved in the film’s development held a panel discussion. (And, yes, I was there) Panel member and bioengineer Brian Hooker, Ph.D., revealed that in recent conversations with Dr. Thompson, he had learned that the CDC had provided Dr. Thompson with strong incentives in exchange for staying with CDC. Dr. Thompson’s continued employment at CDC is critical for the agency to roll out a “reanalysis” of the data, eliminating any link between autism and the MMR vaccine.
You can hear what Dr. Hooker and his fellow panel members had to say by watching this video of the panel discussion. Note: Comments and warnings by Dr. Hooker are from 22:55 to 25:35.
We MUST share this video with as many people as possible. Thanks!

We are witnessing the greatest medical fraud of our time
To summarize: “Unfortunately, Dr. Thompson is handled and will most likely submit a revised version of his analysis and try to absolve the MMR vaccine in May of 2016,” Dr. Hooker told those assembled. “This is typical of what we’ve seen of the CDC. The CDC analyzes data and when they see an effect that they don’t like, they reanalyze data and the effect goes away. The CDC has done this historically, from Agent Orange to thimerosal, now to the MMR vaccine.”
Dr. Hooker went on to say that while he did not want the day to come when the CDC released its new version of the same data, he also knew the writing was on the wall. “In exchange for what Dr. Thompson is doing, I believe – and this is a little bit shaky – I believe he will get his own autism research foundation and so there has been some very, very dubious activities that went on because he stayed in the CDC. He also got a major cash award from the CDC for maintaining his employment, he said, until he qualified for retirement. But there are a lot of things that have happened since the last conversation that I had with Dr. Thompson, which was in September of 2014,” explained Dr. Hooker.
He told those in attendance that he wanted to warn them and allow them to anticipate the CDC’s next move. “But again, it’s the same thing that we’ve heard and we’ve seen from an agency that’s been completely captured by the pharmaceutical industry, and is there not to tell the truth, but in order to manipulate the public in order to do what they think is the best thing to do for society.”
Searching for truth amid censorship, spin and malfeasance
Also speaking from the panel, respected vaccine safety advocate Mark Blaxill told those in attendance, “The medical-industrial complex cannot govern itself.” He went on to describe a world in which civil, polite people are put into position to do things that, “feed the interests of the bureaucracies and the corporations that they are a part of. It’s an economy of influence and everybody scratches everybody else’s back, and it is all around us.”
While censorship of Vaxxed undoubtedly has not gone as its detractors predicted, questioning so-called authoritative agencies and revealing the truth to the public about vaccine safety while going up against the wealthy pharmaceutical industry, is a formidable task. In describing the public’s lack of knowledge on the issue of vaccine safety, Blaxill said, “You ultimately get the news that your advertisers pay for in the long run. So, you have the revolving door from the agencies to the pharmaceutical companies. You have payoffs between the pharmaceutical companies and inventors and experts.”
He concluded by calling on the assembled to join in the fight. “This is destroying a generation of children. Half of American children have a chronic health condition.”

References:
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/vaxxed-vaccine-dangers-1817.html
http://www.naturalhealth365.com/mmr-vaccine-dangers-1792.html
http://www.naturalnews.com/053790_MMR_research_data_William_Thompson_vaccine_safety_science.html

[onawah]

California Vaccine Mandates and The Boiled Frog Effect
http://bolenreport.com/california-vaccine-mandates-boiled-frog-effect/#more-3099
Posted on May 2, 2016

The California mandate issue may need its own thread (maybe it already has?) but with VAXXED so much in the headlines now, I thought this would get more attention here, and it needs more attention! If the mandate succeeds in CA. it will probably be much harder to stop it from spreading, needless to say....



By Karri Lewis – AWAKE California



Do you remember that old “science” experiment where a frog immediately jumps out of a pot of boiling water when placed directly into that boiling water?

However, when the frog is placed in a pot of cold water and the temperature of the water is very slowly raised to a boil, the frog stays in the pot and boils to death?

At this point, you’re probably wondering what this has to do with California, vaccine mandates, and BOUGHT, Pharmaceutical-owned politicians?

Stay with me here.

Imagine now that the frog is the public at large, the boiling water represents vaccine mandates and the Pharmaceutical Industry; and the cold water represents the California State government.

This is ALL very good imagery to explain HOW the Pharmaceutical companies became so entangled and enmeshed within the California State government.

Like the frog being brought to a boil, slowly, the California public has been led to forced vaccination medical experimentation and mandates.

Vaccines and the mandates that followed, were very slowly foisted upon the gullible and unsuspecting public.

Interestingly enough, these vaccine mandates were all put into place WITHOUT ANY Prestigious, Scientific Medical Journal publishing a single, peer-reviewed scientific study that showed vaccinated children are healthier than unvaccinated children.

If a Peer-Reviewed Published Scientific study showed that vaccinated children were healthier than un-vaccinated children, THAT information would have showed up EVERYWHERE by now!

HOW can THAT possibly be?

Like the frog in the cold water, the California government and Big Pharma slowly turned up the heat, aka., adding more vaccines to the mandated schedule; while the frog (the public), happily sat there and allowed the water to get hotter and hotter, until it boiled to death (forced vaccination mandates; California senate bill 277 and senate bill 792).

HOW does one REVIVE a Boiled Frog, the California Public?

Fortunately, the Pharmaceutical companies and California government did not count on so many parents coming forward with their stories of vaccine-induced injuries and deaths.

The California government tried to sweep all of these horrific vaccine injury stories under the rug at the state committee hearings last year. The people of California did not get to tell their stories of vaccine injury and were shushed by the committee chairs when they over spoke their opposition to forced vaccination mandates.

I was there and saw it all.

You would think that the California legislature would be interested in hearing what their citizens, that they are supposed to be representing, had to say. But sadly, the majority of California legislatures’ minds were already made up ahead of time.

The Pharmaceutical lobby had been very generous with donations before and after these forced vaccination mandates were railroaded through.

California citizens’ freedom of speech rights were trampled by the California legislature when they were only allowed to state their name, their city and their opposition to any of the forced vaccination bills.

Microphones were immediately shut off, if a person said anything other than what they were allowed to say.

…so much for the First Amendment and freedom of speech!

Another problem for California citizens is that they had a hard time getting into appointments to see their representatives to convey their objections to forced vaccination mandates.

Many California State representatives claimed they were booked up during the months that forced vaccination mandates were being legislated and decided upon. Allegedly, only a handful of appointment slots were available per issue with some representatives. And those slots were gobbled up quickly, most likely, by Canary Party cronies with their “Safe and Effective” messaging.

I remember parents and activists being steered towards specific groups and people for “effective” messaging. These “thought leaders” were also quick to point out that you could not say that vaccines are dangerous and cause injury.

The focus could only be about personal rights. These people claimed that our representatives would never understand or “hear” a story about vaccines not being safe.

Hmmmm, just WHO was being lied to here?

The messaging was wrong from the get go. Instead of real Californians that experienced first hand, the true damage that vaccines had caused to their children and families, telling their stories to their California State representatives, we had so-called “thought leaders” telling people exactly what they should tell their representatives in closed door meetings.

Interestingly enough, these meetings had been scheduled weeks in advance and were sometimes the only meetings that California legislators would allow.

When I asked one of these “thought leaders” for a copy of the presentation that they were bringing into their representatives, this person refused to give me a copy or share any information as to what was being said or shared. I asked others in the group to share that information and I could not get anyone to share. They apparently were all sworn to secrecy.

Through the grapevine, I did hear that these “thought leaders” were pushing arbitrary statistics and numbers that put the legislators to sleep; glossy-eyed, dazed and confused, as to what the point of the meetings even were.

Without knowing their agenda, I refused to participate in their scheduled and highly-orchestrated meetings with California representatives. And this is just what I experienced locally last year!

truthwillsetyoufreeCan you imagine if real Californians with real vaccine injuries had shown up to confront their representatives about the damage being done to children? I seriously doubt the California legislature would have passed the forced vaccination mandates as easily, if at all.



Back to the Boiled Frog, the California Public…

Pharmaceutical companies and the highly BOUGHT California State legislature do not want the TRUTH about vaccines to get out to the public.

Real vaccine safety and efficacy data being given to the public is what Big Pharma and the California legislature FEAR the most. Can you imagine the Public Relations nightmare?

The longer that Big Pharma can keep up the charade that vaccines are “safe and effective” the longer they can hang their hats on these forced vaccination mandates.

The TRUTH is the only thing that can revive the boiled frog, the California public. Throw the California public into the boiling water and watch them jump out en- masse.

Vaccine Injured children and adults must get their stories out en-masse – and to their local, state and federal legislators. All of this needs to be recorded on public record.

These same folks need to be at every town hall, official public event, public outing in mass telling their stories in brightly colored t-shirts with VACCINE DAMAGED written across every shirt; as Tim Bolen has suggested in a previous article:



Doctors and healthcare workers need to be educated about the lack of vaccine safety testing and clear conflicts of interest at the CDC, and the BOUGHT California State government.

Scaring the public is how Big Pharma and the California State legislature passed these forced vaccination medical mandates in the first place.

It’s time they get a little dose of their own medicine, administered with a large dose of TRUTH!

By Karri Lewis – AWAKE California

Also see: