View Full Version : New reverse speech analyses support a JFK assassination conspiracy
Rex
30th March 2016, 20:15
Latest research by David John Oates, discoverer of Reverse Speech:
<<snip>>
On November 22nd 1963, the United States of America was attacked and overthrown in a violent Coup d’état when President John F. Kennedy was brazenly assassinated in Dallas Texas. This, arguably the greatest crime of the 20th century, occurred in broad daylight before the eyes of 100’s of witnesses. The general public was conned to believe that the assassination was carried out by a crazed lone gunman named Lee Harvey Oswald while the real assassins covered their tracks and got away Scott free.
Using the technology of Reverse Speech and recently released audio, the pieces of this treasonous act have slowly been put together.
Presented below are speech reversals found on Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged assassin, Jack Ruby, who was ordered to kill Oswald, Lyndon Baines Johnson who ascended to the Presidency as a result of his cooperation with the Coup, and the real mastermind of the plot, FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover. Hoover was operating in conjunction with a consortium of high powered men in the Halls of Washington, as well as the Israeli government. Johnson was aware the coup was taking place, approved of it, but had little knowledge of the specific operational details.
etc...
<</snip>>
http://www.jfkassassinationsolved.com/
The Bush connection is no surprise...
moekatz
30th March 2016, 22:13
Excellent post! This stain on the USA needs as much light on it as possible. The overthrow of the elected government in 1963 shows us just how much a "presidential vote" really means. NOTHING. If we really believe we have the power to install an elected official in the corrupted system, we are dreaming. We haven't even been able to get the truth of the assassination out and its been 53 years.
Cardillac
31st March 2016, 00:07
one does not have to reference reverse speech in order to find a 'suspected' conspiracy behind the JFK assasination; the facts are out there proving it was most definitely a transnational plot and the published facts (obviously never in MSM) have been there for a long time in the alternative media/books-
please stay well all-
Larry
mojo
31st March 2016, 01:42
That's a neat avatar with the wiener sled dogs. In the past have posted on a number of reverse speech finds on the forum. Scott Peterson "hit her neck" (Lacey), the Pope's reversals were shocking, some of Jon Kelly's reversals on ufos were cool and others like Obama's evil nature were not too surprising. My first interest on the subject was when the Beatles used it in one of their songs, with the phrase, "I buried Paul," which were made up by them but others were not that easy to explain away.
Bill Ryan
1st April 2016, 00:29
one does not have to reference reverse speech in order to find a 'suspected' conspiracy behind the JFK assassination;
Exactly! :)
As an aside, my own personal experience of 'reverse speech' is that I have never once been able to make out anything intelligible, ever — unless I was being directed what to expect to hear.
Mark (Star Mariner)
1st April 2016, 13:09
I believe reverse speech analysis is little more than a kind of "pareidolia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia)" of the ears. It's natural for the human senses to latch onto meaningful patterns when confronted with randomness or chaos.
You could play back literally any piece of spoken audio relating to anything or nothing in particular, and if you listen long enough you will pick out something that sounds like 'Oswald', 'JFK', 'we killed him' etc or whatever other message the brain has a fancy to hear. The effect is pretty much the same I think when staring at patterns of rock strata on the surface of Mars.
Mike
1st April 2016, 15:50
one does not have to reference reverse speech in order to find a 'suspected' conspiracy behind the JFK assassination;
Exactly! :)
As an aside, my own personal experience of 'reverse speech' is that I have never once been able to make out anything intelligible, ever — unless I was being directed what to expect to hear.
I/m glad you said this Bill. Ive been saying it for eons, but folks are more likely to listen to you.
Anyone recall the old art bell episodes on reverse speech? Every time the guest "expert" played some garbled mess of a recording, Art would go practically giddy with excitement. I could never make left or right of it. funny thing: I don't think Art could either, but he acted as if it was *obvious* when the guest offered his translation:facepalm:
I believe reverse speech analysis is little more than a kind of "pareidolia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia)" of the ears. It's natural for the human senses to latch onto meaningful patterns when confronted with randomness or chaos.
You could play back literally any piece of spoken audio relating to anything or nothing in particular, and if you listen long enough you will pick out something that sounds like 'Oswald', 'JFK', 'we killed him' etc or whatever other message the brain has a fancy to hear. The effect is pretty much the same I think when staring at patterns of rock strata on the surface of Mars.
I/m glad you said this Bill. Ive been saying it for eons, but folks are more likely to listen to you.
Anyone recall the old art bell episodes on reverse speech? Every time the guest "expert" played some garbled mess of a recording, Art would go practically giddy with excitement. I could never make left or right of it. funny thing: I don't think Art could either, but he acted as if it was *obvious* when the guest offered his translation:facepalm:
I have to disagree with both of you that there isn't anything to this. I've been following Reverse Speech and David John Oates for at least 20 years, from before the feud that happened between him and Art Bell. I'd consider myself an almost-amateur RS analyst, having taken the free intro course and listened to hundreds of reversals.
One thing to keep in mind, something Jeff Rense mentioned, is that the more emotion in the forward speech, the clearer the reverse speech becomes.
I agree with Bill, it's hard to find reversals on your own. For some people it may be easier, that have a sort of natural talent/ear for it. That said, I occasionally attempt it anyway, and usually find some, but they have to be the super-clear ones. In fact I actually found one or two reversals in one of Bill's interviews from a few years back.
Observer1964
19th April 2016, 05:36
I have had experiences of my own with reverse speech that were very remarkable and leads me to believe it is real.
I was once interviewed for a local tv station in east of holland, I was asked a question about social security service changing their opening times. When I heard the question my inner response was (in dutch) Now I dont like that very much, however I answered a bit more politically correct and explained why i felt it was wrong jadajada etc.. when it was broadcasted i managed to record it on my PC and when i reversed it at the exact spot of my answer was in clear dutch exactly my first inner response (Nou, dat vind ik niet zo leuk) Now I dont like that very much
I was totally amazed as it was exactly how i heard it in my thoughts.
Another thing, in a video about a UFO contact from the '60s a designer who took the case serious was also interviewed, now i made english subs to that video so i was listening and looking very closely and at some point i had the thought like the crew was silently laughing at him. and just for fun I reversed that little part and at the point i had that feeling or thought or whatever it was, you could hear the guy in clear dutch Man, ze lachen je uit. (Man they laugh at you)
So I also am convinced that there is absolutely something to this reverse speech thing.
sigma6
19th April 2016, 06:50
the Pope's reversals were shocking,
wouldn't surprise me in the least... will check it out for that alone... the Vatican was definitely a big player... the big hand behind the mafia... and other assassins... it seems in this world of politics, war and commerce... assassins will never be out of work...
Observer1964
19th April 2016, 08:05
I also listened to some reversals from the pope and Donald Trump, The pope admirring he is evil and Trump seems to be more of a noble man then i was willing to give him credit for.
I believe reverse speech analysis is little more than a kind of "pareidolia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pareidolia)" of the ears. It's natural for the human senses to latch onto meaningful patterns when confronted with randomness or chaos.
You could play back literally any piece of spoken audio relating to anything or nothing in particular, and if you listen long enough you will pick out something that sounds like 'Oswald', 'JFK', 'we killed him' etc or whatever other message the brain has a fancy to hear. The effect is pretty much the same I think when staring at patterns of rock strata on the surface of Mars.
Can you give some examples?
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.