Biological type UFOs

[mojo]

Remember this episode from Star Trek? About an empath that meets a living ship and where he gains new meaning in life...There are so many intriguing things about the Tin Man episode...

Oa7iYA0rX7A


James Gilliland also believes their craft are highly intelligent biological beings.

...a few thoughts about biological types... some personal observations as well.
1.The craft are able to pass through dimensions and solid objects.
2. The craft is somewhat symbiotic with the crew.
3.The biologic ships are sentient beings.
4. (observed here) Colorful interiors with no known source of light other than it emanates from the craft itself. Their interior is comprised of colors that change and flow over the interior walls and ceilings.
5. (observed) The outside surface is opaque or transparent with vascular plant leaf structure for water transport. The surface is comprised of small pores like the stomata of a leaf that change in diameter. These holes appear to let colored light to escape to the outside environment. There appear to be additional solid like structures ie seat, light holders, and patterns surrounding lights windows.

A recent video breakdown showing separate frame shots and the variety of size & color changes.
vtjAtOhDqWs
screen shots from Oregon sighting showing clues to the surface structure

[Rex]

Absolutely remember that episode, it was one of the ones I've remembered to this day.

[KiwiElf]

Also the very first two episodes of STAR TREK TNG - "Encounter at Farpoint" - the enormous jellyfish-looking sentient beings are remarkably like those portrayed in the later MATRIX books by Valdemar Valerian (pseudonym) as OUR true (human) forms?.
These earlier ST TNG episodes were still under the control of Gene Roddenberry at the time.

There are (or were) quite a few YouTube videos floating around a few years ago of what were [allegedly] clearly "living things" in Earth's orbit, changing colours, some translucent, changing shape and of immense size.

Here are a couple of examples: While I don't agree with the "absolutist theory" in the second video, the phenomenon is quite real...

Lo3hsb65Blc

wRZLt9W6GZM

[DeDukshyn]

My favourite episode!

I have always imagined that the ultimate technology would be living. I often thought we might at one point in the future dwell in living houses - sort of like trees, but engineered to be more advanced, collect and store energy surpluses, supply lighting and heat. It's energy and building blocks would be acquired from sunlight/photosynthesis, waste product, maybe even wind power somehow (wind blows through branches, leaves, etc. and the kinetic energy is turned into storable energy).

Of course, at this point in time, men are still using the powers of genetics for pathetic and selfish reasons ...

[ghostrider]

Ive read information that says these objects are from another dimension...

[DNA]

Lo3hsb65Blc



Speaking of which, this is supposed to be a real photo taken by a photographer hired by Wilhelm Riech while one of Riech's apprentice's held an orgone type tube up in the air.
This didn't just show up on film, it was said to have appeared and vanished when the apprentice began running and screaming.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/f8/47/b0/f847b056e5a53ee7e6c9d0ea3b5937bd.jpg

It is my opinion that the old adage of an aether in the upper atmosphere and in space is probably true. This popular belief began to dwindle with the on set of theoretical physics, but I'm of the opinion that what we are taught is often a smoke screen to cover up what is real.

I think it is this aether that the orgone machines of Reich are affecting.

There is an author by the name of Trevor James Constable. He wrote a couple of books under the name of Trevor James: "They Live In The Sky" 1959 and "Sky Creatures-Living Ufo's" 1978. Here is an excellent web page covering Trevor's work in these two books. The SkyCritters by Trevor James Constable (http://www.tarrdaniel.com/documents/Ufology/skycritters.html)
Trevor used the Orgone machines built by Welheim Reich to draw these creatures over the Mojave desert and then photographed them with infared photography. It was stated that you needed film that took pictures outside of the spectrum humans could see in. I find this a little disturbing.
Isn't it a little odd that these things just happen to be capable of being photographed just outside of our visual capability? Doesn't it seem like these things are purposefully staying out of our visual capabilities? What does that say?

Here is a photo of one of these Sky Critters next to an organite machine.

http://www.tarrdaniel.com/documents/Ufology/images/skycritters/amoeba1.jpg

[amor]

What we think of as space is chock-a-block filled with intertwining frequencies of which all matter is formed. Therefore, it is foolish to think that "space" is either a vacuum or empty.

[onawah]

See Jean Luc Bozzoli's artistic renditions of biological underwater UFOs here:
http://jeanlucbozzoli.com/Paintings.html
He lives in Hawaii and dives with groups of people who seek such encounters.
http://jeanlucbozzoli.com/1980/sing1AA.JPG
http://jeanlucbozzoli.com/1980/ETvortexA.JPG

[EFO]

On topic:I don't want to offend somebody on this thread and please accept my apologize if someone feel offended about my following question:Which one of you,excepting mojo,saw with his own naked eyes an UFO?I'm asking this because almost every UFO has its own "behavior".From my experience some of them react to my/others laser beams,some not.

Considering those who react to laser beams these could have or not "crew or pilots" on board or could be a biological type of UFO.

Off topic:I've read a book or see an youtube video,I don't remember,about an alleged captured EBE which explain that his craft is a sort of symbioses between he and his craft.

[DNA]

In my previous post there is a picture by Trevor James Constable, the one with the orgone rods in the lower right hand side.
I think it is worth pointing out that in the "tether" incident, the tether was in fact a long cable being used in an energy gathering experiment by NASA.


I find it intriguing to no end that in both of these instances, these "sky critters" have been filmed while an energy experiment was going on.
Also, Trevor James Constable states that NASA filmed these critters in the unltraviolet, Trevor himself states that when he photos these things it is in the infrared and or the ultraviolet.


Trevor James Constable below is doing a Granada investigation.
He goes over the NASA tether incident. And he talks about taking pictures of these sky critters. He states that he would go to the desert and after a while he started to notice a pulsing in certain areas of the sky. When he would point his camera at the pulsing he would get pics of these sky critters. It's a good watch and I recommend it for folks interested in this topic.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eBck494b4Pg


eBck494b4Pg

[mojo]

Hi,
The biological skyfish are a little different than the bigger symbiotic craft of the Star Trek, "Tin Man". There are great examples of the skyfish type, but hardly any info on this other type. There's only observational data that helped to form an hypothesis and some data is open to debate. Such as why claiming a biological type craft that is sentient and that is possibly symbiotic with the crew. If a correlation on other sightings can be used as a collage there are some interesting inferences that can be made. The Oregon sightings are how the idea of a tin-man type craft is visiting along with observation over time.
1. How is it the crew can manifest in a form that is energy like "light" yet also be in solid form other times? The same as the craft can do to pass through solid objects like trees.
2. Light balls/smaller shapes in past video show very rapid movement, faster than humanly possible. Heard their footsteps on the roof, also observed through binoculars the solid form ETs could still move faster than what our science tells us.
3. The intelligence behind the craft wanted to be seen/or filmed by the videographer. Why? So much stealth yet why show themselves?
4. Spotlight type of light ball that can change in diameter, intensity, color, size and also be directed as a beam. Other beautiful colored lights on the interior that can move and create different colored zones.

here is a short clip to help identify the surface of the craft. Picture an orange peel type skin that is transparent and that has a vascular plant like structure running throughout such as in water transport use for plants.
lpqnwQyLgJ0

The snapshots below helps show small portions of the transparent surface

[DNA]

Hi Mojo

In the NASA tether incident, the crafts can be measured because the length of the Tether is a known factor. As such you are looking at quite a few ships that are 2+ miles in diameter. If we were to park one of those over a major metropolitan city like Los Angelos are New York City it would block out the sky, just like in the movie Independence Day.

Also, 2 miles was conservative. Many people think that the craft were at a much greater distance behind the Tether, which would put their size in the 50 mile diameter range.

[shaberon]

Trevor Constable suggested that the physical bodies of the "critters" were just a few calcium ions. Their entire mass is only a handful of atoms. They, like the "tether" creatures, appear interested in energy (the tether itself was, of course, a success). This type of thinking states that these biological forms don't really have material bodies that they cloak or dematerialize; they are simply made of almost nothing, and are more noticeable when interacting with energy.

[DNA]

Trevor Constable suggested that the physical bodies of the "critters" were just a few calcium ions. Their entire mass is only a handful of atoms. They, like the "tether" creatures, appear interested in energy (the tether itself was, of course, a success). This type of thinking states that these biological forms don't really have material bodies that they cloak or dematerialize; they are simply made of almost nothing, and are more noticeable when interacting with energy.

Hey Shaberon
I would love to see that one post you actually thanked.
It must have been a doozy. :)

[conk]

I have an older video on an even older PC (that needs a power supply). There are interviews with early astronauts, prior to Apollo. One of them states excitedly, "I'm not so sure there aren't living critters out there". In the context of the discussion he meant biological critters.

[mojo]

hope you can upload the video...

[KiwiElf]

On topic:I don't want to offend somebody on this thread and please accept my apologize if someone feel offended about my following question:Which one of you,excepting mojo,saw with his own naked eyes an UFO?I'm asking this because almost every UFO has its own "behavior".From my experience some of them react to my/others laser beams,some not.

Considering those who react to laser beams these could have or not "crew or pilots" on board or could be a biological type of UFO.

Off topic:I've read a book or see an youtube video,I don't remember,about an alleged captured EBE which explain that his craft is a sort of symbioses between he and his craft.

I've seen dozens of UFO's over many years EFO, but none I'd necessarily say were biological. However, one night, just mucking around with my camera, I snapped a couple of pics just to test the range of the flash. When I looked at these and brightened them up in Photoshop (ie really banged up the brightness & contrast), dozens of globular "things" showed up in the pics, overlapping and everywhere to be seen - looking very much like DNA's "Skycritter" pic above, or you could say a very large paramecium) - they were transclucent and all different. Photographic artifacts? Quite likely, but I'd expect those to be perfectly round?

That same night, a typical UFO/ORB flew over so I snapped it. As could be expected, it came out as a pinpoint of light, just like a star, as it looked to the naked eye. Again, blowing out the contrast/brightness of the "UFO", I got an enormous ball of light with a triangular artifact in the center, but this didn't happen to the surrounding stars.???

Other UFO's have "reacted" to my thoughts, stopping, wiggling & changing direction, even in front of witnesses (many UFO reporters have claimed similar behaviour?). I have no idea what's happening here...

[mojo]

seen dozens of UFO's over many years EFO, but none I'd necessarily say were biological

That is a unique thing about them, that they are rare to see. There's nothing nuts and bolts about them. At least from personal observation and reviewing video and even the light energies in the spectrum of colors and how the light changes in size color or intensity. Even where the light is positioned there doesnt seem to be metallic connections to hold the light source.

Below is the original video of 2011 and now armed with personal insight we can watch how special the lights themselves are...

kwJY3i1Vzl4

[KiwiElf]

I'm wondering if anyone else can duplicate what I did above? ie, take a photo outside at night, aim it across the street somewhere, with the flash ON, (you should essentially end up with a black image and just nearby areas lit), then download it into Photoshop or similar and adjust the levels up to really burn the photo out? That particular time, I just used a standard Kodak cheapie point-&-shoot digital camera (KODAK EasyShare C433 to be exact, auto settings)?

[DNA]

I'm wondering if anyone else can duplicate what I did above? ie, take a photo outside at night, aim it across the street somewhere, with the flash ON, (you should essentially end up with a black image and just nearby areas lit), then download it into Photoshop or similar and adjust the levels up to really burn the photo out? That particular time, I just used a standard Kodak cheapie point-&-shoot digital camera (KODAK EasyShare C433 to be exact, auto settings)?


Hi KewiElf I had brought up Jane Tripp on another thread and Araucaria guided me to a thread here on Avalon where Jane Tripp actually showed up to participate in the thread about her, which was pretty cool.
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?84692-Proof-of-time-travel-by-Jane-Tripp&p=992038&viewfull=1#post992038
I mention Jane Tripp because she is really into photoshop and contrast to bring things out of pictures she feels are something associated with Time Travel. I don't know if it is time travel, but she she does seem to be bringing things out of her pictures, images of bodies, faces, it just appears to be people a lot of times.


Jane Tripp stated this.

You might like to try using ACDSee photo-editor Sunpaw. They always have a month's free trial for the full version. It's all I use at the moment.

http://www.acdsee.com/en/products/acdsee-pro-8 (http://www.acdsee.com/en/products/acdsee-pro-8 )


And this



About the software allowing for continual magnification - I don't know myself exactly what happens, but here is my take on it. I'm writing an article (I write quite a few at a time) called 'Beyond the Pixel' A pixel is supposedly the smallest addressable component in a digital image, and there are sub-pixels, but there is no present explanation for the results I get, and although I've discovered how to do this, I'm not actually technically that knowledgeable about digital imaging.

Pixelation occurs when an image is over-enlarged to the point where the little colored squares of the bitmap is revealed. Usually, this ruins an image, so who would normally start cropping and enlarging, looking further? Some anomalies discovered in this way are almost microscopic, yet they retain all their detail and color.

When I suspect or see evidence of photographic anomalies, I just keep cropping and enlarging images, sometimes dozens of times or more, and new color images - entire scenes often - just keep appearing through the layers, so I just keep on editing them.

To me, this just means that we do not yet properly and fully understand the nature of certain photographic images. Clearly there is more to some of them than a flat 2D picture. In fact, these special photos have layers which can be travelled through, giving them quite literally an extra dimension.

As I travel through them, cropping and enlarging as I see different imagery come forward, I find that some of the pictures are themed - miniature scenes connected by subjects, i.e. hospital imagery, restaurant-related themes, religious images, or more exciting to find, images from the past, sometimes seemingly hundreds of years old.

I discover things because I'm completely dissatisfied with the amount of real information available, and I decide to know more, and go after more with insatiable curiosity. My research and experimentation begins at the point where most people who investigate paranormal images stop.


Also, Trevor James Constable stated that when he was photographing the "sky critters" he always attempted to do so outside of the visual range. He mostly took photos with infra-red film, which he stated strangely enough got super expensive "after" he had released his book on the subject. He stated he also had luck photographing using "ultra violet" film I'm pretty sure.


While reading Jane Tripps stuff, she had mentioned a source that had influenced her, this source stated that they had more luck using a quartz lens because it allowed more ultraviolet light in.


I've checked on ebay and the once ultra expensive quartz crystal lenses can be had for pennies on the dollar now.

[DNA]

Here is a really good video of some skyfish seemingly floating to the ground on video.
It's only 3 minutes long. Pretty trippy.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7TONwh_A94

[KiwiElf]

VERY Trippy... but WHAT ARE they????

[DNA]

VERY Trippy... but WHAT ARE they????


This was debated a few years ago on a thread here on Avalon. Lots of good input from some old posters like Rahkyt and Modwiz.
SKY FISH OF NASA TETHER INCIDENT DON JUAN'S MUDSHADOWS? (http://www.unicusmagazine.com/skyfish.htm)


There is a guy who uses the information left in Carlos Castaneda's books and combines that with some other stuff. He is of the opinion that the skyfish are the mudshadows of Castaneda's books, which would also be the Archons of Gnosticism. Here is his article. MEET OUR COVERT CONTROLLERS: THE ARCHONS http://www.unicusmagazine.com/skyfish.htm


Also, the authors name is Robert Stanley
Here is an interview with the same Robert Stanley who wrote the article above.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frIhzLHHryA
frIhzLHHryA

[EFO]

On topic:I don't want to offend somebody on this thread and please accept my apologize if someone feel offended about my following question:Which one of you,excepting mojo,saw with his own naked eyes an UFO?I'm asking this because almost every UFO has its own "behavior".From my experience some of them react to my/others laser beams,some not.

Considering those who react to laser beams these could have or not "crew or pilots" on board or could be a biological type of UFO.

Off topic:I've read a book or see an youtube video,I don't remember,about an alleged captured EBE which explain that his craft is a sort of symbioses between he and his craft.

I've seen dozens of UFO's over many years EFO, but none I'd necessarily say were biological. However, one night, just mucking around with my camera, I snapped a couple of pics just to test the range of the flash. When I looked at these and brightened them up in Photoshop (ie really banged up the brightness & contrast), dozens of globular "things" showed up in the pics, overlapping and everywhere to be seen - looking very much like DNA's "Skycritter" pic above, or you could say a very large paramecium) - they were transclucent and all different. Photographic artifacts? Quite likely, but I'd expect those to be perfectly round?

That same night, a typical UFO/ORB flew over so I snapped it. As could be expected, it came out as a pinpoint of light, just like a star, as it looked to the naked eye. Again, blowing out the contrast/brightness of the "UFO", I got an enormous ball of light with a triangular artifact in the center, but this didn't happen to the surrounding stars.???

Other UFO's have "reacted" to my thoughts, stopping, wiggling & changing direction, even in front of witnesses (many UFO reporters have claimed similar behaviour?). I have no idea what's happening here...

Sorry for late reply.I'm agree with you and until now I did't think that could be also biological EFOs and who knows what other kinds of EFOs could exists.I'm glad that you experienced many sightings because you have an argument into this kind of discussion.I also altered my photos to find out more and sometimes these procedures gave more than I expected.

I don't know how you have take the photo of that EFO which came out as a pinpoint of light,because as I saw these occurrences they,as you said, came out as bright point of light 3-4 times bigger than a star and in a matter of a few millisecond is diminishing its light to a size of a star and continue its flight path until it disappear from my sight or simply disappear as it appear.But is also possible that for you to be other kind of behavior of EFOs.You know better than us what you saw.

What you described in the third paragraph is also happened to me and my wife.The reason what they stopped,changing direction,signaling back,sending luminous "drones/probes" or slowing down their speed,I don't know - possible reaction to thoughts,laser bean or taking our marks (DNA,energetic footprint or something else).

This discussion remain open,perhaps on this forum,perhaps in private.

[EFO]

Here is a really good video of some skyfish seemingly floating to the ground on video.
It's only 3 minutes long. Pretty trippy.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7TONwh_A94

I don't know how much real is this video,but presuming that is real I can tell you the "flying spheres" are orbs,for the rest I can only presume.

Well,the orbs are harmful and usually precede plasma entities,as I call them,but in most of the cases they came together or are produced by plasma entities. I have opened a thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?90770-Plasma-entities) on this subject.All what I encountered with orbs,plasma entities and other,let's call them energy/etic forms,was only in a good way and orbs especially are very playful.In the last post of my thread I described how plasma entities look like because I wasn't able to upload any photo yet.

[DNA]

Here is a really good video of some skyfish seemingly floating to the ground on video.
It's only 3 minutes long. Pretty trippy.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7TONwh_A94

I don't know how much real is this video,but presuming that is real I can tell you the "flying spheres" are orbs,for the rest I can only presume.

Well,the orbs are harmful and usually precede plasma entities,as I call them,but in most of the cases they came together or are produced by plasma entities. I have opened a thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?90770-Plasma-entities) on this subject.All what I encountered with orbs,plasma entities and other,let's call them energy/etic forms,was only in a good way and orbs especially are very playful.In the last post of my thread I described how plasma entities look like because I wasn't able to upload any photo yet.


These ARE NOT simply orbs. Look closer. I've seen plenty of orb videos in my life, and these things look distinctly different.