WhiteLove
5th June 2016, 13:42
Earlier this year all of a sudden a number of YouTube channels started appearing making predictions of an economic collapse to occur in May 28 2016. I found this to be complete utter rubbish, partly because I could not see any clear such signs in my own analysis and partly because I found no substantial arguments for it either. But what I did find was that it seemed unlikely that the dollar would collapse on a Saturday.
But when you closely watch what is common about all of these videos, is that they target various persons that make predictions along this theme. I have been open to the fact that some kind of collapse could occur, but that leading to this event will be some signs of it ahead in the markets. I also find that many times some of the people predicting weak times ahead have some good fundamentals in their arguments but that it is difficult to pin point the exact date. Therefore I can understand these views being presented. But what seems to occur is that some force out there is trying to take advantage of all of these persons by attaching false information to them, for instance that they hint at a collapse coming in May 28. Now that this has not occurred, new channels are popping up and content is deleted on existing sites and replaced by content saying that the dollar collapse is coming on 27 September.
Here are some of the names that have had this kind of content attached to them by this unknown force:
Putin, Alex Jones, Peter Schiff, "Russian General", Ron Paul, Vatican, Lindsey Williams, "Anonymous", "Russia", Sheikh Imran Hosein...
Peter Schiff is listed very frequently to these videos, so it might be that Peter knows something and that they try to discredit him by attaching false predictions to his comments. So it is some kind of propaganda taking place on YouTube...
The combination of these names seem to suggest they are maybe not Cabal's best friends. Can anybody here hint at what information it might be that makes Peter one of the chosen ones? Can you find any particular YouTube video with "dynamite" content presented by him that might be behind it?
Maybe this:
07fTsF5BiSM
On a side note. It's interesting how pretty much every person (on the left wing) that was asked responded that some kind of limit on corporate profits would be a good idea.
But when you closely watch what is common about all of these videos, is that they target various persons that make predictions along this theme. I have been open to the fact that some kind of collapse could occur, but that leading to this event will be some signs of it ahead in the markets. I also find that many times some of the people predicting weak times ahead have some good fundamentals in their arguments but that it is difficult to pin point the exact date. Therefore I can understand these views being presented. But what seems to occur is that some force out there is trying to take advantage of all of these persons by attaching false information to them, for instance that they hint at a collapse coming in May 28. Now that this has not occurred, new channels are popping up and content is deleted on existing sites and replaced by content saying that the dollar collapse is coming on 27 September.
Here are some of the names that have had this kind of content attached to them by this unknown force:
Putin, Alex Jones, Peter Schiff, "Russian General", Ron Paul, Vatican, Lindsey Williams, "Anonymous", "Russia", Sheikh Imran Hosein...
Peter Schiff is listed very frequently to these videos, so it might be that Peter knows something and that they try to discredit him by attaching false predictions to his comments. So it is some kind of propaganda taking place on YouTube...
The combination of these names seem to suggest they are maybe not Cabal's best friends. Can anybody here hint at what information it might be that makes Peter one of the chosen ones? Can you find any particular YouTube video with "dynamite" content presented by him that might be behind it?
Maybe this:
07fTsF5BiSM
On a side note. It's interesting how pretty much every person (on the left wing) that was asked responded that some kind of limit on corporate profits would be a good idea.