We just got slammed (M5.2 earthquake, SoCal)

[Rocky_Shorz]

Anyone feel that?

[cursichella1]

Near San Diego? Friends did. I'm too far North...

[Hervé]

Southern California rocked by 5.2 earthquake
(http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2016/06/10/southern-california-rocked-earthquake/85684852/)
http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/dd8b1baf67130a1edc52e1868cb7f1ece5f42a54/r=26&c=26x26/local/-/media/USATODAY/staff/images/writer_autos-woodyard_chris.png Chris Woodyard (http://www.usatoday.com/staff/716/chris-woodyard/), USA TODAY 8:43 a.m. EDT June 10, 2016

http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/c4acb0f621b3dbbe8e8a667b1675808fbe7031ca/c=72-0-540-624&r=537&c=0-0-534-712/local/-/media/2016/06/10/USATODAY/USATODAY/636011306670922544-quake.JPG
(Photo: USGS, EPA)



LOS ANGELES — An earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 5.2 rocked Southern California, rousing residents out of bed at about 1:05 a.m. PT on Friday.

The quake was centered about 13 miles north-northwest near Borrego Springs in the desert east of Los Angeles, the U.S. Geological Service reported. It was initially rated at 5.1, but was upgraded to 5.2 within an hour afterward.

On the west side of Los Angeles, about 100 miles from the epicenter, the quake produced a long shaking motion lasting about 30 seconds. There was no hard jolt.

In USA TODAY's news bureau on the ninth floor of an office tower near Los Angeles International Airport, window blinds shook and the building structure rolled in steady waves.

The quake was also felt in San Diego.


http://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/eaad4e557c461e8e08be17a5c03e4d16e5323458/c=0-15-582-453&r=x408&c=540x405/local/-/media/2016/06/10/USATODAY/USATODAY/636011312227522163-Capture.JPG
A tweet from Los Angeles television station KNBC shows how the quake looked on a seismograph (Photo: Twitter)


Seismologist Lucy Jones tweeted that quake struck on the San Jacinto fault, one of the most active in the region. She says the same fault produced a magnitude-6 earthquake in 1937 and a 5.3 quake in 1980.


http://www.gannett-cdn.com/usatoday/editorial/graphics/2016/06/061016-CA-earthquake.jpg

[Inversion]

At 1:04 in the video it shows the unusual straight line and right angle pattern to the quakes.

www.youtube.com/channel/UCFjOi1ZpZVErr8EYxg8t1dQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I00j_XiYXbM

[Hervé]

Re: the Dahboo77 video ^^^ Inversion's comment

The graphic software answer:



Guys, have another look at Quakewatch. I wrote a post previously about the quakes all being lined up!! My daughter and I compared other sites round the world where there have been multiple earthquakes. Christchurch for one and also Porta Rico. These places also experience daily quakes. Not as many as the Canaries, but still, many earthquakes. Non of these other places show earthquakes in lines like they do in the Canary Islands!!! Its still odd to me. Amzer So, your explanation seemed quite feasible, but when comparing the Canaries with other places round the world, the lineups of earthquakes seem to be only in the Canaries.

What's happening with the display of the earthquake positions for El Hierro is that they are so close to each other that the programs they (Google, Quakewatch, RSOE EDIS, etc...) use for displaying these positions are not accurate enough.

Therefore they round up the coordinates to the next higher order decimal available. The problem resides with the zoom capabilities of the program they use, it doesn't go beyond a fixed amount and they adjusted the coordinates computation and display to that maximum zooming.

That doesn't mean the EQs themselves are occurring on a grid pattern. To verify, this check the positioning of the EQs here: http://www.01.ign.es/ign/resources/volcanologia/HIERRO.html, there are 8000+ EQs concentrated within a 0.10 x 0.10 square...

No grid pattern there, as their plotting program is far more accurate, down a few more decimals than on Google Earth and the likes.

You can go to this page: http://www.01.ign.es/ign/layoutIn/volcaListadoTerremotos.do?zona=2&cantidad_dias=10 and try to plot the Longitudes and Latitudes given on a diagram and see for yourself for fun...:p

Good observation otherwise. :thumb:

PS: These are real earthquakes (check above diagrams) delineating the progression of a real magma chamber over a known hotspot/plume.


... in other words, the graphic display of earthquake locations are "Snapped to (graphic) grid." (you know, like desktop icons... all perfectly aligned rather than falling all over the place :))

[Snoweagle]

Re: the Dahboo77 video ^^^ Inversion's comment

The graphic software answer:



... in other words, the graphic display of earthquake locations are "Snapped to (graphic) grid." (you know, like desktop icons... all perfectly aligned rather than falling all over the place :))Here are 10 ways that space weapons, satellites, can be used to conduct warfare. Or methods of transferring huge amounts of catastrophic energy into tiny spaces on top of and underneath the mantle of the globe.

The following is listed at:
http://www.space.com/19-top-10-space-weapons.html

Missile
The ability to destroy man-made satellites in orbit around Earth has already been demonstrated by China, who used an anti-satellite (ASAT) device against one of their own weather satellites. The US likewise shot down a crippled spy satellite in 2008 with a sea-based missile. India has said they wish to develop similar capabilities. The problem: Huge swarms of space debris generated by blowing up objects remain in orbit, and threaten manned spacecraft.
- See more at: http://www.space.com/19-top-10-space-weapons.html#sthash.5nnlyhfs.dpuf

Darpa
Does a device that uses electromagnets to shoot a stream of molten metal at incredible speed toward enemy targets sound far-fetched? The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is already working on one, with the appropriately aggressive-sounding name of "MAHEM" (Magneto Hydrodynamic Explosive Munition). Pictured is Earthlight, an Arthur C. Clarke novel that presaged exactly this device.
- See more at: http://www.space.com/19-top-10-space-weapons.html#sthash.5nnlyhfs.dpuf

THEL
Directed-energy weapons utilize lasers, high-powered microwaves, and particle beams. Projects in development by the US have names like Airborne Laser, the Active Denial System, and the Tactical High Energy Laser (THEL). However, before these weapons can "stun" or "kill" like a Star Trek phaser, engineers need to do much work to weaponize the various forms of energy under consideration.
Cosmic Satellites
Soviet Union’s Almaz Space Station
MOL
ICBM
X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle (OTV)

High-altitude Weapons
Manipulating an orbiting asteroid

- See more at: http://www.space.com/19-top-10-space-weapons.html#sthash.5nnlyhfs.dpuf

Cosmic Satellites
Home-grown microsatellite and nanosatellite technologies are being proliferated by a number of nations, hinting at some military uses. In one U.S, Department of Defense report, military officials took at face value a Hong Kong newspaper account in January 2001 that claimed China had developed and tested an ASAT system using a "parasitic microsatellite." Apparently this device could have been a small satellite designed to attach itself to other satellites to destroy or damage them. This sexy but unsubstantiated assertion quietly vanished from further DoD reports.
- See more at: http://www.space.com/19-top-10-space-weapons.html#sthash.5nnlyhfs.dpuf

Soviet Union’s Almaz Space Station
Weapons in space need not be so exotic. Take the former Soviet Union's Almaz Space Station of the 1960s and '70s. The military space station reportedly carried a cannon to destroy satellites or incoming spacecraft. It was even reportedly tested (while no one was aboard the spacecraft) to demonstrate its feasibility. Other space-based conventional weapons could include more exotic packages of destruction, such as radio-frequency or high-power-microwave munitions.
- See more at: http://www.space.com/19-top-10-space-weapons.html#sthash.5nnlyhfs.dpuf

MOL
In the USAF's Manned Orbital Laboratory (MOL) program of 1965, two astronauts would launch atop a Titan 3 rocket in a spacecraft similar to NASA's Gemini capsules, then conduct reconnaissance missions from orbit using ultra high-resolution telescopes. The project was scuttled in 1969, and unmanned spy satellites proved a better option later.
- See more at:http://www.space.com/19-top-10-space-weapons.html#sthash.5nnlyhfs.dpuf

MOL
In the USAF's Manned Orbital Laboratory (MOL) program of 1965, two astronauts would launch atop a Titan 3 rocket in a spacecraft similar to NASA's Gemini capsules, then conduct reconnaissance missions from orbit using ultra high-resolution telescopes. The project was scuttled in 1969, and unmanned spy satellites proved a better option later.
- See more at: http://www.space.com/19-top-10-space-weapons.html#sthash.5nnlyhfs.dpuf

X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle (OTV)

Credit: NASA/Boeing
Scheduled for a test flight on April 20, 2010, the reusable robotic X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle (OTV) is a small space shuttle-like craft developed by the US Air Force. If such a reusable space plane becomes feasible, it will offer unheard-of capabilities for launch on-demand, surprise, and flexibility. If those benefits aren't enough, the space plane may be outfitted with a weapon to drop tungsten rods on Earth targets from outer space, the so-called "Rods from God."
High-altitude Weapons
Manipulating an orbiting asteroid
- See more at: http://www.space.com/19-top-10-space-weapons.html#sthash.5nnlyhfs.dpuf

High-altitude Weapons
High-altitude weapons using electromagnetic energy may destroy and disrupt electronic and electrical devices, causing a burst of electromagnetic radiation (electromagnetic pulse, or EMP) to produce current and voltage surges. These bursts are commonly associated with nuclear explosions, but scientists have produced non-nuclear EMP's. The construction of small "e-bombs" poses a significant terrorist threat against airplanes.
- See more at: http://www.space.com/19-top-10-space-weapons.html#sthash.5nnlyhfs.dpuf

Manipulating an orbiting asteroid
Could an orbiting asteroid be manipulated to smash down on an enemy target on Earth? It's possible, but doesn't seem like an efficient way of doing battle, according to a RAND think-tank report. More effort would be required to achieve such a result than was employed to develop the first A-bomb during the Manhattan Project in WWII, says RAND.
- See more at: http://www.space.com/19-top-10-space-weapons.html#sthash.5nnlyhfs.dpuf
______________________________

Google: satellite weaponry, anti-satellite weaponry

Be a little imaginative with your searches: Where are . . .? Who owns . . . ? Which ones . . . ? etc

This is overwhelming evidence of the cause of that grid pattern portrayed in DABOO7s video.

I would suggest the grid pattern are "strikes" by satellite bursts, scoping the area for weak geological points in the mountain mantle. The grid suggests one point above all others produced a valuable target for further exploitation at a later date. I also believe this pattern will be re-produced at other locations through this mountain range so eventually all the weak points could be targeted as one satellite mega strike.

The magnitude of which might potentially separate California from the mantle of the USA. Even put California of some sort of peninsula in some way.

Satellite technology proponents claimed in the 1970s (1960s?) they could read the newspaper being read by a man in the street or see the brand of the cigarette pack discarded by someone under investigation.

Weather events world wide are behaving abnormally, forests are being targeted, volcanoes rekindled, crops spoiled and of course Dr Woods excellent discourse on the use of satellite weapons during the 9/11 event.

DABOO7 also makes a point to query the depth of the quakes which is abnormal. These are evidences for the use of satellite weapons, creating the conditions for earthquakes and liquefaction.

This explanation is far more credible than that of software graphics iconography. - though it did raise a wry smile, thanks :-)

[Hervé]

[...]
This explanation is far more credible than that of software graphics iconography. - though it did raise a wry smile, thanks :-)

Well, here is an exercise for any non-lazy skeptic: Hunt down the accurate Long/Lat coordinates of these "aligned" earthquakes, plot them down on a map and see for yourself if they "snap-to-grid" in spite of their various coordinate decimals.

[Snoweagle]

We clearly disagree.

Your preposition is to advise people to take your word for it and ignore all else.

My preposition is to advise check out both and see which one you believe:-)

You infer my explanation is that of a lazy sceptic and those that subscribe to the interest I raise as being lazy, when in fact they have to work rather hard to uncover some of the truths which my links allude.

Yet, your explanation requires nothing more than to refer to a "managed software platform" to infuse a false paradigm, perpetrating succour to those that may feel fearful.

The USA is under attack is the emphasis of my post. That is significantly more truthful than the alternative you propose and should be the topic of this discussion here on this thread.

[Hervé]

I did that exercise for the El Hierro case where there were far more EQs and the resolution was even finer... check it and see for yourself is all I suggested.

[Bill Ryan]

The USA is under attack is the emphasis of my post [ ... ] and should be the topic of this discussion here on this thread.

Well, no — Rocky started the thread to ask if anyone else felt it. :)

Do by all means open another thread on the subject of earthquake wars, or whatever you'd like to call it. I'd be pretty sure that human-induced (or -assisted) earthquakes happen. (And if they don't, there's surely someone in the Pentagon who wants a budget for it. :) )

:focus:

[ghostrider]

Stay at the ready, that area is overdue for a big quake , just north of you a massive sea quake is predicted, a 9.0 lasting five minutes creating a ring shaped tsunami ...

[tessfreq]

This guy Dutchsinse predicted the east of San Diego quake(s) in his most recent video. I haven't been watching him that long, but his model for prediction seems to be getting results.

oSmjcZLYtQ0

[skyflower]

I felt it, but I was dozing on and off at about that time, so I thought it was a dream. :o

[Rocky_Shorz]

A 3.5 quake just hit by Mexicali where the 7.2 Easter quake hit 5 or 10 years ago.

As for the earthquake weapon, Russia had a politician go off about making the world shake just last year.

[Rocky_Shorz]

A 3.6 just hit north east of here, been years since this many hit so close together...

[Rocky_Shorz]

While looking to see if dutchsinse has any more videos out I ran across one he did with Kerry

Our quakes started right after what they shared in this video...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Bqmlj6__UA


Edited to add they are talking pre 2012 in this video though it was published 2 weeks ago...

As Kerry says there are no coincidences...

Talking of Nuke plants all being built on fault lines, which would instantly change the atmosphere of our planet. ET plot for when they are prepared to take it to eliminate humans...

[Rocky_Shorz]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XHUqw-F3ZrM

Swarm of quakes in northern California has Dutchsinse worried...

He said to expect quakes off Oregon's coast...

[Rocky_Shorz]

5.0 Northern California...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DtxAp-AfPcc

[Bob]

Here are the official reports - " It " didn't happen today, was reported as of 8-9-2016 as detailed below (for accuracy).

There is nothing out of the ordinary for California - it appears according to the reports out of USGS and CalTech its all normal stuff. http://scedc.caltech.edu/recent/Maps/123-39.html -

From the website: "Maps are updated within about 5 minutes of an earthquake or once an hour."

There was no today quake of 5.1 - (thread title misnomer) Nothing out of the ordinary, one 5.1 in the last 168 hiours. Nor the day before. The biggest were 3's and most are lower (see the recent quake list). Nada, zip..


http://scedc.caltech.edu/recent/Maps/123-39.gif

MAP 5.1 2016/08/09 19:57:17 39.329N 122.802W 14.4 21 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA

http://scedc.caltech.edu/recent/Quakes/nc72672610.html


U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California
U.C. Berkeley Seismological Laboratory, Berkeley, California


Version #11: This report supersedes any earlier reports of this event. This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.

A moderate earthquake occurred at 7:57:17 PM (PDT) on Tuesday, August 9, 2016. (this doesn't constitute being "slammed")
The magnitude 5.1 event occurred 21 km (13 miles) NNE (27 degrees) of Upper Lake, CA.
The hypocentral depth is 14 km ( 9 miles).



Magnitude 5.1 - moment magnitude (Mw)
Time Tuesday, August 9, 2016 at 7:57:17 PM (PDT)
Wednesday, August 10, 2016 at 2:57:17 (UTC)
Distance from Upper Lake, CA - 21 km (13 miles) NNE (27 degrees)
Nice, CA - 23 km (14 miles) N (10 degrees)
North Lakeport, CA - 28 km (18 miles) NNE (18 degrees)
Lakeport, CA - 33 km (21 miles) NNE (17 degrees)
Redwood Valley, CA - 35 km (22 miles) ENE (78 degrees)
Coordinates 39 deg. 19.8 min. N (39.329N), 122 deg. 48.1 min. W (122.802W)
Depth 14.45 km (9.0 miles)
Quality Good
Location Quality Parameters Nst=120, Nph=121, Dmin=17.2 km, Rmss=0.15 sec, Erho=0.12 km, Erzz=0.21 km, Gp=32 degrees
Event ID# nc72672610
Additional Information map || waveforms
Did You Feel It?
First Motion Focal Mechanism
Moment Tensor Solutions
NCSN First Motion Mechanism 1
NCSS Moment Tensor Solution

http://scedc.caltech.edu/recent/Quakes/quakes0.html


Recent earthquakes

EXTRACT centered on the 5.1 (days before and after) California-Nevada - this is the historical

3.8 2016/08/10 06:12:28 39.960N 122.785W 8.0 33 km (21 mi) W of Rancho Tehama Reserve, CA
1.0 2016/08/10 04:51:44 38.813N 122.821W 1.9 7 km ( 4 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
2.1 2016/08/10 04:19:52 39.344N 122.797W 9.6 22 km (14 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
0.3 2016/08/10 04:15:02 38.787N 122.772W 3.1 2 km ( 1 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
0.6 2016/08/10 02:46:29 38.825N 122.842W 0.9 9 km ( 6 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
2.0 2016/08/10 02:36:30 39.327N 122.803W 5.2 20 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
2.1 2016/08/10 02:01:03 38.824N 122.842W 0.3 9 km ( 6 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
0.6 2016/08/10 01:47:18 38.779N 122.716W 2.2 4 km ( 2 mi) E of The Geysers, CA
1.8 2016/08/10 01:30:47 39.315N 122.780W 11.2 20 km (12 mi) NE of Upper Lake, CA
1.1 2016/08/10 01:24:41 38.786N 122.773W -1.0 2 km ( 1 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
1.1 2016/08/10 01:10:09 38.827N 122.840W 0.8 9 km ( 6 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
1.2 2016/08/10 00:48:27 38.825N 122.842W 0.1 9 km ( 6 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
1.1 2016/08/10 00:48:11 38.826N 122.842W 1.4 9 km ( 6 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
1.9 2016/08/10 00:47:43 38.824N 122.840W 0.9 9 km ( 6 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
2.7 2016/08/10 00:47:15 38.824N 122.840W 0.4 9 km ( 6 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
1.9 2016/08/10 00:26:36 39.318N 122.794W 9.7 20 km (12 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.1 2016/08/09 23:58:38 38.825N 122.806W 2.3 7 km ( 4 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
2.3 2016/08/09 23:25:12 39.329N 122.800W 1.6 21 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
2.2 2016/08/09 23:23:47 39.322N 122.804W 4.5 20 km (12 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.8 2016/08/09 23:08:43 38.813N 122.818W 2.5 7 km ( 4 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
2.1 2016/08/09 22:57:09 39.358N 122.780W 5.5 24 km (15 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.9 2016/08/09 22:30:50 39.309N 122.785W 9.5 19 km (12 mi) NE of Upper Lake, CA
2.1 2016/08/09 22:27:59 39.315N 122.785W 14.4 20 km (12 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
2.2 2016/08/09 22:26:53 39.318N 122.788W 10.5 20 km (12 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.6 2016/08/09 22:20:04 39.324N 122.801W 7.3 20 km (12 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
0.9 2016/08/09 22:14:09 38.805N 122.764W -0.2 3 km ( 2 mi) NNW of The Geysers, CA
2.0 2016/08/09 22:13:00 39.310N 122.784W 10.1 20 km (12 mi) NE of Upper Lake, CA
2.2 2016/08/09 21:32:17 39.326N 122.789W 12.4 21 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.6 2016/08/09 21:30:00 39.329N 122.796W 14.2 21 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
0.5 2016/08/09 21:26:26 38.808N 122.819W 2.9 6 km ( 4 mi) WNW of The Geysers, CA
1.7 2016/08/09 21:24:52 39.316N 122.787W 11.5 20 km (12 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.7 2016/08/09 21:23:48 39.319N 122.786W 11.3 20 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.6 2016/08/09 21:06:38 39.314N 122.783W 11.5 20 km (12 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.7 2016/08/09 20:57:43 39.319N 122.794W 7.7 20 km (12 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.8 2016/08/09 20:43:36 39.330N 122.797W 11.1 21 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.8 2016/08/09 20:28:26 39.334N 122.803W 9.2 21 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
3.0 2016/08/09 20:24:19 39.329N 122.795W 16.3 21 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
2.2 2016/08/09 20:20:07 39.315N 122.785W 10.3 20 km (12 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.9 2016/08/09 20:16:37 39.340N 122.800W 10.8 22 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.8 2016/08/09 20:15:14 39.331N 122.793W 13.2 21 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
1.7 2016/08/09 20:13:42 39.314N 122.781W 11.8 20 km (12 mi) NE of Upper Lake, CA
1.6 2016/08/09 20:13:28 39.310N 122.783W 10.0 20 km (12 mi) NE of Upper Lake, CA
1.9 2016/08/09 20:09:18 39.321N 122.783W 11.9 21 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
2.6 2016/08/09 20:08:26 39.309N 122.784W 11.2 19 km (12 mi) NE of Upper Lake, CA
1.8 2016/08/09 20:07:38 39.332N 122.799W 11.6 21 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
5.1 2016/08/09 19:57:17 39.329N 122.802W 14.4 21 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
0.9 2016/08/09 18:32:45 38.842N 122.829W 1.0 9 km ( 6 mi) WNW of Cobb, CA
0.9 2016/08/09 18:16:42 38.792N 122.744W 1.3 2 km ( 1 mi) NNE of The Geysers, CA
1.0 2016/08/09 17:14:46 38.810N 122.800W 3.3 5 km ( 3 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
0.6 2016/08/09 17:13:36 38.835N 122.800W 1.9 7 km ( 4 mi) WNW of Cobb, CA
1.1 2016/08/09 16:41:13 38.836N 122.799W 2.4 7 km ( 4 mi) WNW of Cobb, CA
1.7 2016/08/09 16:33:08 38.834N 122.799W 2.3 7 km ( 4 mi) WNW of Cobb, CA
2.1 2016/08/09 14:19:33 39.327N 122.807W 1.2 20 km (13 mi) NNE of Upper Lake, CA
0.9 2016/08/09 11:51:11 38.832N 122.809W 1.6 8 km ( 5 mi) W of Cobb, CA
2.6 2016/08/09 09:26:36 38.943N 122.247W -0.4 18 km (11 mi) WSW of Arbuckle, CA
0.6 2016/08/09 07:33:19 38.836N 122.812W 5.2 8 km ( 5 mi) WNW of Cobb, CA
1.6 2016/08/09 05:43:37 38.787N 122.772W 2.3 2 km ( 1 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
1.1 2016/08/09 05:37:40 38.823N 122.784W 1.8 5 km ( 3 mi) W of Cobb, CA
0.9 2016/08/09 02:21:24 38.816N 122.764W 2.0 4 km ( 2 mi) W of Cobb, CA
1.6 2016/08/09 00:19:22 38.817N 122.810W 2.6 6 km ( 4 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
0.5 2016/08/08 23:56:08 38.786N 122.738W 1.3 2 km ( 1 mi) ENE of The Geysers, CA
0.6 2016/08/08 21:18:20 38.805N 122.828W 5.5 7 km ( 4 mi) WNW of The Geysers, CA
0.9 2016/08/08 20:18:11 38.821N 122.785W 1.4 5 km ( 3 mi) W of Cobb, CA
1.1 2016/08/08 19:28:59 38.812N 122.823W 2.6 7 km ( 4 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
0.6 2016/08/08 16:26:16 38.827N 122.844W 1.8 9 km ( 6 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
0.6 2016/08/08 15:38:45 38.788N 122.746W 1.2 1 km ( 1 mi) NE of The Geysers, CA
0.3 2016/08/08 14:10:09 38.839N 122.829W 1.9 9 km ( 6 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
1.4 2016/08/08 11:43:15 38.651N 122.725W 6.0 13 km ( 8 mi) ENE of Healdsburg, CA
1.1 2016/08/08 09:45:15 38.822N 122.843W 1.7 9 km ( 6 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
0.5 2016/08/08 08:00:15 38.790N 122.776W 1.3 2 km ( 1 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
1.1 2016/08/08 06:32:10 38.805N 122.797W 3.6 5 km ( 3 mi) NW of The Geysers, CA
0.7 2016/08/08 01:40:33 38.813N 122.828W 1.8 7 km ( 5 mi) WNW of The Geysers, CA
1.1 2016/08/07 22:58:29 38.786N 122.761W 1.8 1 km ( 1 mi) NNW of The Geysers, CA
1.1 2016/08/07 22:21:54 38.842N 122.766W 1.2 4 km ( 3 mi) WNW of Cobb, CA
1.2 2016/08/07 19:47:35 38.773N 122.721W 1.3 3 km ( 2 mi) E of The Geysers, CA
0.6 2016/08/07 19:42:46 38.798N 122.814W 5.0 5 km ( 3 mi) WNW of The Geysers, CA


(list shortened due to PA post limitations)

Click on the full page HERE (http://scedc.caltech.edu/recent/Maps/123-39.html) for recent quakes - nothing out of the ordinary happening..

http://scedc.caltech.edu/recent/Maps/123-39.html

[Curiosity]

"The idea of using technology to trigger of earthquakes and other weather weapons seems inconceivable to those who are not paying attention or are ill informed. But look closer at who benefits from chaos and destruction, and who has been conducting the research and you will see a pattern emerging and a mechanism at work."

"Dahboo reports on a series of bizarre earthquakes happening in a controlled grid pattern, typically at a shallow depth and at a relatively low magnitude:"

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/is-someone-trying-to-start-a-megatsunami-strange-earthquakes-go-off-in-precise-grid-pattern_08122016

[Hervé]

[...]
"Dahboo reports on a series of bizarre earthquakes happening in a controlled grid pattern, ...."
[...]

... makes me seriously wonder about the quality of the guy's research abilities, see this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91247-We-just-got-slammed--M5.2-earthquake-SoCal-&p=1074041&viewfull=1#post1074041) (<---) as well as this one (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91247-We-just-got-slammed--M5.2-earthquake-SoCal-&p=1074180&viewfull=1#post1074180) (<---).

[Curiosity]

Thanks Herve Mods can you move this to the above mentioned thread?

[Mod-edit: Done, Hervé]

[ghostrider]

Sadly here in Oklahom quakes are so common, we have one and I react like the porch lightbulb went out ... the floor rumbles like standing next to an out of balance washing machine ...

[Rocky_Shorz]

While looking to see if dutchsinse has any more videos out I ran across one he did with Kerry

Our quakes started right after what they shared in this video...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Bqmlj6__UA


Edited to add they are talking pre 2012 in this video though it was published 2 weeks ago...

As Kerry says there are no coincidences...

Talking of Nuke plants all being built on fault lines, which would instantly change the atmosphere of our planet. ET plot for when they are prepared to take it to eliminate humans...

Dutchsinse shows massive fracking operations in this video on strong points that would connect let lines on the nuke plant map...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3eB1_Fu3LLw

Following Italy's quake, Yellowstone super volcanoes had a 4.8 hit a near by fracking operation

[Rocky_Shorz]

This 6.8 hit right where Sorcha's report mentioned Russia had warned of a high energy field...

http://m.emsc.eu/Images/EVID/52/527/527102/527102.global.thumb.jpg

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/hhdd3.jpg

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2098.htm


.....According to this bulletin, MoT experts have identified an Atlantic Ocean “disturbance”, known as Invest 99L, that is being “severely and abnormally” affected by what is called the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) that stretches across most of South America to the Southern part of Africa..

[KiwiElf]

USGS showing it as a massive 7.1M!

[Rocky_Shorz]

Is it coincidence, this energy anomaly, which sparked this storm and an earthquake,path perfect up the east coast as a Tropical Storm is kicking up to a hurricane and turning inward directly at DC... Monday, mid day

https://icons.wunderground.com/data/images/at201609.gif

The strange part is, the storm hits DC right at the end of the G20.

From this week's Fulford report

"The Chinese, for their part, have given up on Hillary and, since they also have no love for Republican Candidate Donald Trump, are now considering a more radical move. They have invited...

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to visit China before the big September 4-5 G20 meeting the Chinese are hosting. Sources in Asian secret societies say the Chinese will ask Trudeau if he would be interested in leading a Mexican/American/Canadian North American alliance. "

[KiwiElf]

South Korea is reporting a reasonably strong Earthquake near their southern-most coast near Busan (but reports are varied as to the Magnitude; Japanese Media are reporting it as a 5.1M followed by a 5.8M. - all at approx 10 km depth).

USGS was initially reporting a 4.9M and now a 5.4M. Photos indicate there has been some damage.

This is a bit strange - This site is saying a 5.3?

http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/national/2016/09/12/69/0302000000AEN20160912011351315F.html

https://www.google.co.nz/#q=south+korea+earthquake

[Rocky_Shorz]

After the hit last night off the northern California cost, we have a quake swarm, first time since hearing the prophecy an event matched what happened that fills the warning what to watch for, 2 large quakes... good thing I'm from California, a 5.0 isn't what I concider a big quake


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-jTVTlwivrI.

An earthquake insurance commercial just came on...

Coincidence?

at the end of the video he mentions Yellowstone is in the forecast but shouldn't be larger than a 5.0