View Full Version : Alleged FBI Insider Leaks All - Clinton Foundation Exposed - Involves Entire US Government
KiwiElf
9th July 2016, 20:36
FBI Insider Leaks All - Clinton Foundation Exposed - Involves Entire US Government
Thursday, July 7, 2016 15:49
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2016/07/fbi-insider-leaks-all-clinton-foundation-exposed-involves-entire-us-government-3381515.html?currentSplittedPage=0
(Before It's News)
(NOTE: This thread was from BEFORE the announcement by FBI Director Comey that there would not be any indictment and the recent False Flag Shootings in Dallas).
As with any "anonymous whistleblower" testimony, PLEASE USE YOUR DISCERNMENT!
A thread on 4chan with an FBI insider confirms everyone’s worst suspicions. The Hillary Clinton email server was merely a distraction from the Clinton Foundation and most of DC is in up to their necks in what could be the biggest scandal of all times. This inside info from someone claiming to be a high level FBI analyst whose job was to look at the records, with NOTES added to clarify some of the responses.
The smoking gun is about to arrive and there are “a lot of people involved”. To save everyone time, here are the choice bits with the link to the entire archive, where you can decide for yourself if this is for real or not. Looks like Trump and Putin hold some of the cards. This could be the most interesting election ever. (Language Warning):
You are welcome to copy this, please post a link to the original here at BIN.
This level of corruption is something expected in a developing country or a place like China, where they openly persecute good people and have industrial scale organ harvesting of Falun Gong and others. The Clinton Foundation is up to their neck with Jiang’s vile regime in China, but there is so much to see here…keep reading.
Original thread archived at: http://archive.is/RffAd#selection-33761.0-33761.121
Why Hillary was Not Indicted
>>79480356 (OP)
Will she be indicted?
(NOTE: This thread was from BEFORE the announcement by Comey that there would not be any indictment)
>>79481119
There is intense pressure for us not to do so. I am posting from a position of near anonymity and enough plausible deniability to evade prosecution, as we have all been given gag orders.
There is enough for her and the entire government to be brought down. People do not realize how enormous this whole situation actually is. Whether she will be or not depends on how much info about others involved gets out, and there are a lot of people involved.
Super Classified Materials on the Clinton Email Server
>>79481467
She had SAP (Special Access Program) level programs on her server, which if made public, would literally cause an uprising and possibly foreign declarations of war.
(NOTE: A Special Access Program (SAP) is an intelligence program classified above top-secret. They are held on closed servers at secret locations. The only way to get one is if you are specifically read on to a program, have a need to know, then you must physically go to a location and pass through several layers of security to even look at the program. A good example in non-classified terms would be the locations and operations of our intelligence operatives around the globe, or our missile silo locations.)
The Clinton Foundation is the Key
>>79481382
>>79481397
The real point of interest is the Clinton Foundation, not the e-mail server. We received the server from Benghazi, then from the server we found data on the CF. Then we realized the situation is much worse than previously thought.
(NOTE: This explains why the investigation took so many people and so long)
A Bigger Problem than Hillary
>>79481665
Killing HRC would not cause this problem to go away. The problem is with the Clinton Foundation as I mentioned, which you should just imagine as a massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people. Though I do not have a high opinion of Hillary, she is just a piece -albeit a big piece – of this massive sh*tstorm.
>>79481265
Legal is asking preliminary questions about whether or not she has been coached (she has) and setting up the general line of questioning. I am a high level analyst though, so my job is only to look at her records.
>>79482104
The DOJ is most likely looking to save itself. Find everyone involved in the Clinton Foundation, from its donors to its Board of Directors, and imagine they are all implicated.
The ENTIRE Government is Involved
>>79482245
My opinion is the entire government is guilty of treason, which is why HRC’s death would not cease the investigation or prevent further scandals. Many, many people are involved.
>>79482342
There already is enough to indict. Comey has been trying to stall because he does not want to face the Clinton Machine, as well as the rest of Washington D.C. But this case would explode into a million other cases if fully brought to light, and then we would be one agency competing against the entire government and a hoard of other interests. It is a very tense and uncomfortable position.
What Lynch is saying is she will accept whatever they do and make her determination as she will. Nothing about her responsibilities has changed, she is simply trying to keep her hide intact.
Foreign Powers Have Some of the Documents
Trump Has Some of the Documents
Russia Will Probably Leak All Info they Have
>>79483349
Foreign powers are in possession of some of the documents we have analyzed, because they were hacked from the Clinton server. Trump has some files as well, and likely plans to leak them and use them to his advantage soon.
The leaks will have to be made in a non-transparent fashion.
>>79483350
If we recommend, we literally hand over documentation implying the entire government is involved in treason at the highest levels and everyone is about to duck and cover, as well as some sensitive details of SAPs which would obliterate national security.
>>79483587
I am not sure, but some of my war strategy buddies are estimating a high probability that Russia will leak all of the info they have to the world, since Clinton wants to go to war with them and they have no desire to be in conflict with the US.
>>79483751
If we do not recommend, it will look like a cover-up and Trump will use the perception to bolster his message. I did work in PsyOps once, and Trump’s use of confirmation bias is legendary.
Bill Clinton Will Likely Die This Year
If Trump Wins, Hillary Goes to Jail
>>79484201
Bill Clinton will likely die this year.
Everything is Corrupt, Even Trump is Dirty
>>79484305
Impossible to say. The entire government is corrupt. No one is clean, not even Trump.
>>79484534
Trump has donated to the Clinton Foundation in the past, though for fairly innocuous things like building permits and such. He is smart, so his tracks are covered well. But if any prosecutor wants to go very in-depth Trump would be brought on bribery charges. He could easily get out of them, but he would be charged nonetheless.
>>79484664
We have our hands tied. My message to you and everyone on this board is do not get distracted by Clinton’s e-mails. Focus on the Foundation. All of the nightmarish truth is there. The e-mails will pale in comparison.
>>79484759
I do not know of Trump’s record, but from the case he definitely knew to limit his exposure and make it only look like a donation.
>>79484907
If Trump wins, HRC will be prosecuted. I have heard rumors Christie will be his AG, and Michael Flynn will be his VP pick.
A Multitude of Scandals
>>79485031
Saudi Arabia visits and donations to the CF. Russian Uranium fiasco. HRC and the Israel lobby, the Council on Foreign Relations. AIPAC. The list is endless.
Three Choices – Could Crash Everything
>>79485572
I will put it to you this way: You have three choices,
A) turn over all of the information to the DOJ, make public a recommendation, the truth comes out, the entire world realizes how much the US is meddling in foreign affairs and we go to war, the civilian population realizes how much foreign money influences our government, and a civil war begins.
B) You cherry-pick the data to implicate the people already in the eye of public opinion, so the chips fall on the heads of a select few and the whole system does not crash.
C) you do nothing and watch the unstable political climate to gauge how you will respond.
I am confident if Trump wins she will be going to jail.
The Problem is the Entire Government
>>79485629
Comey will likely resign in any case. FBI is being very quiet for a reason, most of us want to keep our jobs.
>>79485655
Snowden has nothing to do with any of this.
>>79485706
Possibly. I don’t know for sure.
>>79485756
Obama and HRC do hate each other. HRC hates black people and Obama dislikes recklessness. As far as the investigation, some details are correct. As to the outcome, no one knows.
>>79485779
Truthfully, not many. The FBI is rather fond of /pol/. We study more than we investigate.
>>79485920
The problem is with the entire government. HRC is one component of that government.
Hillary Sold SAP’s to Overseas “Donors”
>>79486178
All I can tell you about the SAPs is HRC had them, and she did not have proper authority to have any of them. They were leaked to her by someone, and she did sell them to overseas donors. Possessing them alone makes her guilty of treason.
Obama is loosely tied to the CF, but much more tied in with the same people who donate to the CF.
>>79486240
Russian borders, Ukraine, everywhere NATO is, the South China Sea, the Phillipines, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Africa.
Soros is at the heart of all of this.
>>79486254
If it comes down to it, I would fight. But most of us are of the opinion that HRC will not be president, and having Trump in office makes our job that much easier. But right now we have to carefully wade through the mud.
>>79486263
As I stated before, BC likely wanted LL to focus on the e-mail server and shy away from prosecuting the foundation.
>>79486289
We will go to war with Russia and possibly China if she wins.
Obama Wanted to Postpone the Case Until 2018
>>79483056
Didn’t Obama push to have the case postponed until 2018 as well?
>>79486562
There is talk of it. I do not know where the order came from.
A Difficult Position for FBI Insiders
>>79487155
If leaking data en mass destroys my country, we betray the country. If we do nothing, we betray the country. I am not disagreeing with you. I am saying the situation is more complicated when you are inside, and you do not have the breadth of info that I have that would make your eyes fall out of your skull if you knew what all was going on.
>>79487691
It benefits her because her donors have paid for it. I do not want to post any information about me or where I am, because if any hint got out that I posted anything, I would be fired and blacklisted. Possibly killed.
Soros Guiding Everything – Global Government
>>79488021
Soros funds, instructs, and influences every layer of US government. right down to the tax code.
Correct theories: Huge Jewish influence, Soros as a puppet master, red team planner. You would have to ask specifically.
>>79490049
The goal (of Soros, since I assume that is what you are asking) is to create a global government where all people intermingle and breed and become on people ruled by a racially pure Jewish race. They sincerely believe under their rule all human conflict will cease because there will be no more cause for division. This desire is born out of a fear of the horrors of WWII. The Holocaust is a lie, but the death toll was still massive nonetheless. And many people were brutalized by it.
Russia Hacked the Clinton Email Server 100%
do russia (or others) have enough info to bring down clinton if they leaked it? would they be more likely to leak it or use it for blackmail?
>>79490064
They have enough to take her down. I am not sure of the totality of what they have. I can tell you that they 100% hacked her server.
Orlando and LA Gay Parade Attacks were Inside Jobs
>>79490062
are the incidents manufactured with the intent of harsher gun control laws?
>>79490153
Yes. They gay bar attacks were inside jobs.
If Everything is Exposed, Human Trafficking and all the Payoffs
>>79490632
>In regards to the Clinton Foundation, what would happen if all of this information ended up being released to the general public?
I said in the last thread, total chaos. The government would be exposed at every layer, who pays who, who buys what, and no one has yet asked about the human trafficking bits I have been laying out.
>What if you, you personally, leaked all the documents to the darkweb or some other online outlet. What would happen?
Silencing and/or death. Some places are trying to leak but we censor them too fast.
>Would the countries that would be named in the documentation declare war if there was a large change in government?
No, they would declare war because all of our secret operations in their countries would be exposed.
>Couldn’t you have the AGs of some of the right aligned states indict her? If they were given enough information and documentation?
We have thought about this. It is on the table.
9/11 Was a Mossad Inside Job
>>79489525 (OP)
What do you know about 9/11? Was it an inside job?
>>79490791
9/11 was Mossad.
Get Smarter About Civil War (The FBI’s Main Concern)
>>79490926
If a civil war broke out, 100% certainty China and Russia would get involved.
>Also, what fears would need to be resolved in order for the FBI to be willing to go nuclear on this bitch and the foundation?
This would be like launching a nuke at NYC. We would hit the target, but we would then be at war with the whole US.
The FBI is facing the entire federal government in this case. It is why we are so quiet.
Sex Rings in All Governments
>>79493354
Sex rings are popular in all governments, but pedophilia is primarily in British parliament & Saudi Arabia, and that’s why HRC and BC love foreign donors so much. They get paid in children as well as money. Dig deep and you can find it. It will sicken you.
https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/79480356/ama-about-the-clinton-case#p79480356
THE EVENT IS COMING SOON!
:Angel:
I give it up Kiwi, this stuff sounds intriguing. I find myself shaking my head in affirmation.
KiwiElf
10th July 2016, 01:23
I was sitting on this story before Dallas happened DNA and quite hesitant to post it, so please forgive my strong belief/assertion that Dallas was a False Flag early into that thread. I realise you were justifiably very upset (I was upset and damned angry having read this). Of course, there's no way to verify it, but a case of the "theory seems to fit the facts". It's all over the net now so thought I'd post it with the addition of "Alleged" on the title and the red discernment warning at the top.
The numbers are included for cross referencing to the questions being asked at original link at 4chan - the "whistle blower's" comments/answers are tagged in brown with the ID: bTgVpkEd
This very much relates to the Clinton FBI investigation, Organ Harvesting & the Dallas shootings threads (and a whole lot more).
Craig
10th July 2016, 01:35
wow - I mean ****. May we live in interesting times indeed.
KiwiElf
10th July 2016, 02:04
FOX was getting in on it way before this, and now Hillary IS going to be re-investigated (see Cider's thread for updates) - I think Paul may have been correct in asserting that the Dallas FF could be the capstone event...
FBI's Clinton probe expands to public corruption track (video at link)
Catherine Herridge
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/01/11/fbis-clinton-probe-expands-to-public-corruption-track.html
By Catherine Herridge, Pamela K. Browne Published January 11, 2016 FoxNews.com
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of private email as secretary of state has expanded to look at whether the possible “intersection” of Clinton Foundation work and State Department business may have violated public corruption laws, three intelligence sources not authorized to speak on the record told Fox News.
This new investigative track is in addition to the focus on classified material found on Clinton’s personal server.
"The agents are investigating the possible intersection of Clinton Foundation donations, the dispensation of State Department contracts and whether regular processes were followed," one source said.
Clinton, speaking to the Des Moines Register, on Monday pushed back on the details of a second investigative track. According to reporter Jennifer Jacobs, Clinton said Monday she has heard nothing from the FBI.
"No, there’s nothing like that that is happening," Clinton said, according to a tweet from Jacobs.
Experts including a former senior FBI agent said the bureau does not have to notify the subject of an investigation.
The development follows press reports over the past year about the potential overlap of State Department and Clinton Foundation work, and questions over whether donors benefited from their contacts inside the administration.
The Clinton Foundation is a public charity, known as a 501(c)(3). It had grants and contributions in excess of $144 million in 2013, the most current available data.
Inside the FBI, pressure is growing to pursue the case.
One intelligence source told Fox News that FBI agents would be “screaming” if a prosecution is not pursued because “many previous public corruption cases have been made and successfully prosecuted with much less evidence than what is emerging in this investigation.”
The FBI is particularly on edge in the wake of how the case of former CIA Director David Petraeus was handled.
One of the three sources said some FBI agents felt Petraeus was given a slap on the wrist for sharing highly classified information with his mistress and biographer Paula Broadwell, as well as lying to FBI agents about his actions. Petraeus pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor in March 2015 after a two-plus-year federal investigation in which Attorney General Eric Holder initially declined to prosecute.
In the Petraeus case, the exposure of classified information was assessed to be limited.
By contrast, in the Clinton case, the number of classified emails has risen to at least 1,340. A 2015 appeal by the State Department to challenge the “Top Secret” classification of at least two emails failed and, as Fox News first reported, is now considered a settled matter.
It is unclear which of the two lines of inquiry was opened first by the FBI and whether they eventually will be combined and presented before a special grand jury. One intelligence source said the public corruption angle dates back to at least April 2015. On their official website, the FBI lists "public corruption as the FBI's top criminal priority."
Fox News is told that about 100 special agents assigned to the investigations also were asked to sign non-disclosure agreements, with as many as 50 additional agents on “temporary duty assignment,” or TDY. The request to sign a new NDA could reflect that agents are handling the highly classified material in the emails, or serve as a reminder not to leak about the case, or both.
"The pressure on the lead agents is brutal," a second source said. "Think of it like a military operation, you might need tanks called in along with infantry."
Separately, a former high-ranking State Department official emphasized to Fox News that Clinton’s deliberate non-use of her government email address may be increasingly “significant.”
“It is virtually automatic when one comes on board at the State Department to be assigned an email address,” the source said.
“It would have taken an affirmative act not to have one assigned ... and it would also mean it was all planned out before she took office. This certainly raises questions about the so-called legal advice she claimed to have received from inside the State Department that what she was doing was proper."
On Sunday, when asked about her email practices while secretary of state, Clinton insisted to CBS News’ "Face The Nation," "there is no there, there."
Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence, the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent.
Pamela K. Browne is Senior Executive Producer at the FOX News Channel (FNC) and is Director of Long-Form Series and Specials. Her journalism has been recognized with several awards. Browne first joined FOX in 1997 to launch the news magazine “Fox Files” and later, “War Stories.”
I was sitting on this story before Dallas happened DNA and quite hesitant to post it, so please forgive my strong belief/assertion that Dallas was a False Flag early into that thread. I realise you were justifiably very upset (I was upset and damned angry having read this). Of course, there's no way to verify it, but a case of the "theory seems to fit the facts". It's all over the net now so thought I'd post it with the addition of "Alleged" on the title and the red discernment warning at the top.
The numbers are included for cross referencing to the questions being asked at original link at 4chan - the "whistle blower's" comments/answers are tagged in brown with the ID: bTgVpkEd
This very much relates to the Clinton FBI investigation, Organ Harvesting & the Dallas shootings threads (and a whole lot more).
Did you post it on GLP before posting it here on PA? http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message3225639/pg1
KiwiElf
10th July 2016, 04:08
I only posted it here OMG, but as I said, it's all over the net. This version - as is quite clear in the OP - came from Before It's News with some minor editing as mentioned above. (It was only on BIN at the time - and originally extracted from the second link at 4chan - as far as I know...)
EDIT - clicking your link OMG just got me onto a page of rules on GLP - as I don't belong to them as a member could you please elaborate?
shaberon
10th July 2016, 04:14
I would estimate that at any point in time, an audit of any part of the establishment would dredge up similar material. Actually prosecuting it would be a surprise, but that's what RICO is for.
KiwiElf
10th July 2016, 04:18
The problem is Shaberon, that the US govt are unlikely to prosecute themselves as "they" are implicated - but who knows?. It will most likely be debunked ;)
I speculate there will soon be further (and worse) False Flag events; there will be some hype over "US tensions increasing with Russia"... just tick off the bullet points from the OP ;)
Star Tsar
10th July 2016, 16:00
THE EVENT IS COMING SOON!
What exactly is "The Event"?
Apologies if this is off topic.
KiwiElf
10th July 2016, 16:20
THE EVENT IS COMING SOON!
What exactly is "The Event"?
Apologies if this is off topic.
No probs,... Yes, OMG's comment was off topic, (depending on your POV. ;)) - a thread is devoted to it here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?90877-THE-EVENT-Why-it-could-be-real
shaberon
10th July 2016, 19:02
I can just imagine the power vacuum if everyone in the "Continuity of Government" scheme was suddenly unavailable.
It looks like the Foundation investigation was running the whole time and that the e-mail thing was a cover for it. It would be better than nothing if they "cherry-picked" the findings and took out the biggest/worst offenders; that itself would be unprecedented and would certainly shock everyone who was remotely close to it.
In order to get the Attorney General to go along with any part of it, there will indeed have to be a mountain of solid, irrefutable evidence, not "gross incompetence" that lets them squirm out of it.
KiwiElf
10th July 2016, 19:05
For those researching the original documents at 4chan, the 2nd page is here:
https://archive.is/Gdbkz
The "whistleblower's" Tag changes to bright green and ID: vMmUnwCH (see top of that page & scroll down to the questions)
KiwiElf
10th July 2016, 19:21
I can just imagine the power vacuum if everyone in the "Continuity of Government" scheme was suddenly unavailable.
It looks like the Foundation investigation was running the whole time and that the e-mail thing was a cover for it. It would be better than nothing if they "cherry-picked" the findings and took out the biggest/worst offenders; that itself would be unprecedented and would certainly shock everyone who was remotely close to it.
In order to get the Attorney General to go along with any part of it, there will indeed have to be a mountain of solid, irrefutable evidence, not "gross incompetence" that lets them squirm out of it.
Yes, the original pages at 4chan reveal that the FBI are [allegedly] aiming for Option B - to cherry pick the data out (not in the transcript at the OP)
----------------------------
I note on other sites that "they" are trying to delay the larger investigation into the Clinton Foundation for 27 months
http://operationdisclosure.blogspot.co.nz/
----------------------------
Obama has [allegedly] introduced Executive Order 13603 while we were all being distracted with Dallas....
33779
http://beforeitsnews.com/new-world-order/2016/07/while-you-were-being-distracted-by-the-dallas-hoax-new-e-o-national-defense-resources-preparedness-bill-obamas-plan-to-seize-control-of-our-economy-and-our-lives-6353.html
Friday July 8 2016 @ 15H00, Obama passed a new bill of Executive Order: National Defense Resources Preparedness Bill. Hidden from the mainstream media. This bill will give the president absolute power over all natural resources during both times of peace and or war/national civil unrest. Stop all distribution of the nation’s resources to the population.
-Water
-Food & Live Stock
-Plants
-Health Resources
-Gas/Hydrogen
-Construction Materials
----------------------------
And rumours are surfacing regarding another possible false flag attack (UNlikely we will know in advance - be cautious of this one! - KE)
Dallas-Style False Flag Warning Issued for Shreveport, LA
Sunday, July 10, 2016 7:18
Red List News reporting false flag warning for Shreveport, LA.
http://beforeitsnews.com/conspiracy-theories/2016/07/dallas-style-false-flag-warning-issued-for-shreveport-la-2476197.html
EDIT: Also see Paul's post just a short while ago regarding media manipulation
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91820-An-example-of--alternative-media--news-analysis-manipulation&p=1080804#post1080804
----------------------------
And as I speculated earlier, the MSM is now upping the rhetoric about "Tensions with Russia".
----------------------------
There's a few more bullet points that may be ticked off. The goal seems fairly obvious IMO - create complete civil unrest (war) and introduce martial law delaying the Clinton Foundation investigation indefinitely
AGAIN,... USE YOUR DISCERNMENT for all of this ;)
PathWalker
11th July 2016, 21:32
Friday July 8 2016 @ 15H00, Obama passed a new bill of Executive Order: National Defense Resources Preparedness Bill. Hidden from the mainstream media. This bill will give the president absolute power over all natural resources during both times of peace and or war/national civil unrest. Stop all distribution of the nation’s resources to the population.
-Water
-Food & Live Stock
-Plants
-Health Resources
-Gas/Hydrogen
-Construction Materials
I do not believe this for the simple logic.
The USG is above the law and US constitution. Since they do not respect the laws they do not care to create them.
They do not need laws to confiscate property, jail people and terrorize the people.
The USG is not special in that respect. All governments are using the technique above.
KiwiElf
11th July 2016, 22:09
Whistle blower - The Clinton Foundation Is Rotten To The Core (Stew Webb) - video @ Link
http://www.stewwebb.com/2016/07/11/whistleblower-clinton-foundation-rotten-to-core/
HillaryClinton-Foundation
Submitted by IWB, on July 10th, 2016
by Baxter Dmitry
The Clinton Foundation is part of an international charity fraud network worth over $100 billion since 1997, according to a Foundation whistle blower, as claims the Foundation is rotten to the core begin to emerge from various state departments, insiders and Bernie Sanders himself.
The mainstream media has been attempting to paint the Clinton email scandal as the only scandal, however those in the know have been encouraging us to ‘focus on the Foundation,’ claiming that the corruption runs deep and wide, involving not just the Clinton’s but most of government, including Barack Obama.
The Clinton Foundation is a “massive spider web of connections and money laundering implicating hundreds of high-level people,” according to an FBI insider. When asked how deeply Obama was involved, the FBI insider said “Impeachment-level deep.”
Bernie Sanders weighed in, but only when pushed in an interview with CNN’s Jake Tapper. Hot Air reports that Sanders has remained silent on Hillary’s shady issues. Sanders has endeavored to run a clean, issue-driven campaign. He has refrained from muckraking even when there is muck to rake. When finally asked directly, though, Bernie responded frankly.
“You asked me about the Clinton Foundation. Do I have a problem when a sitting secretary of state and a foundation run by her husband collects many millions of dollars from foreign governments, governments which are dictatorships? You don’t have a lot of civil liberties, democratic rights in Saudi Arabia. You don’t have a lot of respect there for divergent, opposition points of view, for gay rights, for women’s rights. Yeah — do I have a problem.”
The Clinton Foundation, it seems, now has at least one major whistle blower ready to speak out.
Inquisitr.com reports:
Charles Ortel, the whistleblower that blew the lid off the General Electric financial discrepancies in 2008, has been quoted on the Free Beacon. He explains how he became suspicious of the charitable organization after a more or less routine check of their numbers.
“I decided it would be fun to cross-check what their donors thought they did when they donated to the Clinton Foundation, and that’s when I got really irritated, There are massive discrepancies between what some of the major donors say they gave to the Clinton Foundation to do, and what the Clinton Foundation said what they got from the donors and what they did with it.”
Clinton Foundation’s Global Initiative
Hillary Clinton has accepted donations on the part of this organization, but Mr. Ortel said that the charity is not in compliance with state fund-raising registration laws, auditing rules, or disclosure requirements. Bill and Hillary started the foundation in 1997 but neglected to take the legal steps necessary to found a charity, including the ability to solicit funds as a public charity.
Mr. Ortel further alleges that the money collected was not used for the same purposes donors claim they donated it for. Even small charities and churches are held to the principle that if money is donated specifically for one purpose, it cannot be used for another.
http://www.charleortel.com
HillaryClinton-Foundation (2)
The Clinton Foundation is definitely a huge priority to Charles Ortel. On Charles Ortel’s website, he displays his “Third Follow-up Letter to Donors, Charity Regulators, Investigative Journalists and Citizens World Wide.” The letter is an open warning that unabashedly labels the charity a fraud.
“Your help and encouragement in recent weeks is already bringing overdue attention upon the largest unprosecuted charity fraud ever attempted– that being the network of illegal activities worldwide, whose heart is the Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea Clinton Foundation.”
Clinton-Foundation
Hillary Clinton’s involvement cannot be denied. She is named in the foundation’s title. She collects money in their name and has collected from foreign dignitaries while working as Secretary of State.
Charles Ortel continues to write about Bill, Hillary, and Chelsea’s charitable organization in his third follow-up open letter to donors, journalists, and world citizens.
“The Clinton Foundation…has been part of an international charity fraud network whose entire cumulative scale (counting inflows and outflows) approaches and may even exceed $100 billion measured from 1997 forward. Yet state, federal and foreign government authorities, that should be keenly aware of this massive set of criminal frauds, so far, move at a snail’s pace, perhaps waiting for the Federal Bureau of Investigation to reveal the scope of its work and the nature of any findings.”
shaberon
12th July 2016, 00:14
That Executive Order is one that has made the rounds before. It was, in fact, issued in 2012, and is just a minor tweaking of policies that have been in force for decades, which, as you might imagine, are somewhat exaggerated in the claims about it. So far, I've yet to find any Emergency/Executive Order hyped by reactionary literature, that was what they claimed. None.
Foundations and "charitable trusts" are one of the main levers for control of medicine, education, foreign agitation, and always have been.
KiwiElf
12th July 2016, 00:24
Thanks for the tip Shaberon & PathWalker - hadn't seen it before but is why I added "alleged" to the post. PathWalker is right tho, "they" [will] do it anyway ;). (Thought the pic/poster is a good reminder of this :))
bluestflame
12th July 2016, 01:09
"Soros is at the heart of all of this. " BINGO !!!
.. though many more pies than this one are his fingers in
also known to fund various online protest movements to keep well intentioned firmly pointed in the wrong direction
KiwiElf
12th July 2016, 01:27
"Soros is at the heart of all of this. " BINGO !!!
.. though many more pies than this one are his fingers in
also known to fund various online protest movements to keep well intentioned firmly pointed in the wrong direction
Yup, I don't think Soros is even human - see Turiya's latest posts #159 & 160
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?90590-Transition-into-Trump&p=1081129#post1081129
KiwiElf
12th July 2016, 05:00
How the Clinton Foundation operates Illegally and the dirty Hillary money trail - what that means to America.
Y7Lo9wh-kyU
Published on Jul 9, 2016
bluestflame
12th July 2016, 14:09
https://fbcdn-photos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xat1/v/t1.0-0/s526x395/13620371_10157039632120447_1095136427725307790_n.jpg?oh=2396f12bd19aaaab6b87dba45f52b8f5&oe=582925AA&__gda__=1475817643_3f6cda6dc14ac2a7110bc4d3eb317afb
Flash
12th July 2016, 14:23
https://fbcdn-photos-a-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-xat1/v/t1.0-0/s526x395/13620371_10157039632120447_1095136427725307790_n.jpg?oh=2396f12bd19aaaab6b87dba45f52b8f5&oe=582925AA&__gda__=1475817643_3f6cda6dc14ac2a7110bc4d3eb317afb
Exactly, and it will seem to be getting much uglier before it seems to get better. I wish it will all be uncovered, no more hiding, which kills civilisations and twart human beings psyche.
bluestflame
12th July 2016, 22:56
yes is what we need to remember , part of the psychological warfare that has become part and parcel of the overall "assault" has been designed to accentuate the perception of an overwhelmingly overpowering aggressor , main aim being to demoralise mentally and emotionally disarm the intended target
reducing the will to fight/resist and the ability
just more clever marketing , part of the intended effect of the appearingly amateurish false flags of late , giving the impression they are in control of just about everything
they are mistaken
WhiteFeather
12th July 2016, 23:28
"Soros is at the heart of all of this. " BINGO !!!
.. though many more pies than this one are his fingers in
also known to fund various online protest movements to keep well intentioned firmly pointed in the wrong direction
Yup, I don't think Soros is even human - see Turiya's latest posts #159 & 160
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?90590-Transition-into-Trump&p=1081129#post1081129
Some say the top of the free mason organization, is actually the 36th mason not 33. And the 36th degree is not human. So I do agree with your statement about Soros. He may not be human, possibly a reptilian in disguise I assume.
bluestflame
13th July 2016, 00:06
the eyes have it
Ines
23rd July 2016, 20:29
I would not say: "Everything is possible".
I say " All of it is probably true".
:flower:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaV6mmauuf8
DaV6mmauuf8
So part of this initial post by the OP states that Russia has everything that was on Hillary's server, and now Hillary is saying "hey Russia is responsible for the 20,000 doc drop by wikileaks, so Russia is against me so you should be for me".
I find it remarkable that this initial post by the OP has a statement where Russia is stated to in fact have all of the docs that were left to be exploited by Hillary.
My take in all of this?
I think Hillary must have a shread of dignity left in her.
Her subconscious seems to be sabotaging her, because it knows how f**king evil she is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyYqueiMZ1I
fyYqueiMZ1I
Yetti
25th July 2016, 23:44
Thanks KiwiELF< The main problem I see here is : the lies are far biger than the regular folk can digest. And in some level the people who hate or dislike very much Trump cant see HRC as a thread " even if all this is presented in a more official way" they are conditioned and in some way blinded to onle accept 2 options no matter what. I think than we have a chance of a third option , even if the participants are involved in all this , the good side will be : They do not have the gross corrupt masses of the two parties maffia, and could be more manageable for the people, don't you think?
KiwiElf
29th July 2016, 06:18
As foretold in the OP transcript, Wikileaks have now begun leaking the emails (more to come)
Hillary is blaming Russia (it won't matter as both Wikileaks, the NSA AND Russia have the "stash" of incriminating emails ;))
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?92045-Major-Wikileaks-leak-released-22-July-2016
Direct link to the first lot of Wikileaks emails here:
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/
KiwiElf
1st August 2016, 02:03
NSA Whistleblower: Agency Has All of Clinton’s Deleted Emails
by Aaron Klein, 31 Jul 2016
http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2016/07/31/exclusive-nsa-architect-agency-clintons-deleted-emails/
PHILADELPHIA – The National Security Agency (NSA) has “all” of Hillary Clinton’s deleted emails and the FBI could gain access to them if they so desired, William Binney, a former highly placed NSA official, declared in a radio interview broadcast on Sunday.
William Binney, former intelligence official of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) turned whistleblower, arrives to testify at the Bundestag commission investigating the role of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) in Germany on July 3, 2014 in Berlin, Germany. The commission convened following revelations last year that the NSA had for years eavesdropped on the mobile phone of German Chancellor Angela Merkel and other leading German and European politicians. Recent documents released by former NSA employee Edward Snowden show strong activity by the NSA in Germany as well as cooperation between the NSA and the German intelligence service.
Speaking as an analyst, Binney raised the possibility that the hack of the Democratic National Committee’s server was done not by Russia but by a disgruntled U.S. intelligence worker concerned about Clinton’s compromise of national security secrets via her personal email use.
Binney was an architect of the NSA’s surveillance program. He became a famed whistleblower when he resigned on October 31, 2001, after spending more than 30 years with the agency.
He was speaking on this reporter’s Sunday radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” broadcast on New York’s AM 970 The Answer and Philadelphia’s NewsTalk 990 AM.
Binney referenced testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee in March 2011 by then-FBI Director Robert S. Mueller in which Meuller spoke of the FBI’s ability to access various secretive databases “to track down known and suspected terrorists.”
Stated Binney: “Now what he (Mueller) is talking about is going into the NSA database, which is shown of course in the (Edward) Snowden material released, which shows a direct access into the NSA database by the FBI and the CIA. Which there is no oversight of by the way. So that means that NSA and a number of agencies in the U.S. government also have those emails.”
“So if the FBI really wanted them they can go into that database and get them right now,” he stated of Clinton’s emails as well as DNC emails.
Asked point blank if he believed the NSA has copies of “all” of Clinton’s emails, including the deleted correspondence, Binney replied in the affirmative.
“Yes,” he responded. “That would be my point. They have them all and the FBI can get them right there.”
Binney surmised that the hack of the DNC could have been coordinated by someone inside the U.S. intelligence community angry over Clinton’s compromise of national security data with her email use.
And the other point is that Hillary, according to an article published by the Observer in March of this year, has a problem with NSA because she compromised Gamma material. Now that is the most sensitive material at NSA. And so there were a number of NSA officials complaining to the press or to the people who wrote the article that she did that. She lifted the material that was in her emails directly out of Gamma reporting. That is a direct compromise of the most sensitive material at the NSA. So she’s got a real problem there. So there are many people who have problems with what she has done in the past. So I don’t necessarily look at the Russians as the only one(s) who got into those emails.
The Observer defined the GAMMA classification:
GAMMA compartment, which is an NSA handling caveat that is applied to extraordinarily sensitive information (for instance, decrypted conversations between top foreign leadership, as this was).
KiwiElf
2nd August 2016, 11:51
Julian Assange just did it: WikiLeaks Dispenses 23,000 Hillary Emails Marked “C” for Confidential (Classified)
http://openmindmagazine.com/julian-assange-just-wikileaks-dispenses-23000-hillary-emails-marked-c-confidential-classified/
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange told us a month ago that the next batch of leaked Hillary Clinton emails could lead to an indictment.
Now, over 23,000 cables were just put out for the world to see.
Info, images, related links & videos at link
PurpleLama
2nd August 2016, 12:34
https://wikileaks.org/plusd/?qproject[]=cg&q=&qfdestination=Secretary+of+State&qfoclass=CONFIDENTIAL&qtfrom=2009-01-10&qsort=tdesc#result
Here is the link to what is referenced in the above article.
Frankie Pancakes
3rd August 2016, 16:58
- FBI Insider on 4chan /pol/ : "Ask Me Anything About the Clinton Case" - George Soros Is the Kingpin - Follow the Rothschild Thread - Clinton Foundation Uses People as Currency - Jeffrey Epstein's Child Sex Trafficking Network - Bill & Hillary Clinton Get Paid in Money & Children - Hammer HRC's E-mails, Dig Into the CF: Post Everywhere You Can
I found this to be very long but interesting Q & A. Is it all truth? Not sure but lots of information.
http://www.abeldanger.net/2016/08/explosive-q-on-clinton-foundation-fbi.html#more
KiwiElf
3rd August 2016, 17:02
Hi Frankie - there is already a thread on this including the original links to the 4chan page - would you like to merge? :)
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91807-Alleged-FBI-Insider-Leaks-All-Clinton-Foundation-Exposed-Involves-Entire-US-Government
Frankie Pancakes
3rd August 2016, 17:11
Might as well. I ran the headline but no therads came up.
KiwiElf
3rd August 2016, 17:29
Mods - please merge our threads as above.
No worries Frankie - we've all done that before! ;) Your's is good backup in case it gets lost from 4chan :)
KiwiElf
9th August 2016, 18:51
Hackers Set To Release PRIVATE VIDEOS OF CLINTON: “The World Will See The Real Hillary”
Tuesday, August 9, 2016 11:17
http://beforeitsnews.com/survival/2016/08/shock-claim-hackers-set-to-release-private-videos-of-clinton-the-world-will-see-the-real-hillary-2631810.html
With Wikileak’s Julian Assange announcing this week that a new trove of hacked Hillary Clinton documents will be released to the public, it has been claimed that this latest leak of sensitive campaign material may be the death knell for the former Secretary of State.
But this next round of leaks may not just include damning emails that tie Clinton to pay-to-play schemes through her family’s Clinton Global Initiative fund.
According to a 4chan post from an anonymous source who appears to have inside knowledge of the coming leaks, hackers have obtained personal videos of Hillary Clinton that will reveal “the real Hillary.” The source of the leak is reportedly Clinton’s closest aide, Huma Abedin.
Via Red Flag News:
* The 4chan user, posting anonymously, said “SHTF (sh*t will hit the fan) in 48-hours.
* Huma Abedin is the leak.
* Private videos of Hillary shot by her to be released,” the post reads.
* The post alleges they were videos of Hillary Clinton in meetings that “prove treason.”
* The post claims Russia Today has the videos — given to them by "J.A." (likely Julian Assange) — and will air them likely Saturday.
The original 4Chan post (please note: more readable if downloaded and enlarged)
33938
Chip
10th August 2016, 16:19
Julian Assange now claiming that recently murdered Seth Rich was the "leak".
My guess a more likely scenario than blaiming the Russians.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2016/08/wow-breaking-video-julian-assange-suggests-seth-rich-wikileaks-dnc-source-shot-dead-dc/
WOW! BREAKING=> Julian Assange Suggests Seth Rich – Who Was MURDERED in DC – Was Wikileaks DNC Source!
Jim Hoft Aug 9th, 2016 8:15 pm 3020 Comments
On July 8, 2016, 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich was murdered in Washington DC. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.
Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.
Seth Rich’s father Joel told reporters, “If it was a robbery — it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money — he still has his credit cards, still had his phone so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life.”
WOW! BREAKING=> Julian Assange Suggests Seth Rich – Who Was MURDERED in DC – Was Wikileaks DNC Source!
Jim Hoft Aug 9th, 2016 8:15 pm 3020 Comments
On July 8, 2016, 27 year-old Democratic staffer Seth Conrad Rich was murdered in Washington DC. The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.
Shortly after the killing, Redditors and social media users were pursuing a “lead” saying that Rich was en route to the FBI the morning of his murder, apparently intending to speak to special agents about an “ongoing court case” possibly involving the Clinton family.
Seth Rich’s father Joel told reporters, “If it was a robbery — it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money — he still has his credit cards, still had his phone so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life.”
The Metropolitan police posted a reward for information on Rich’s murder.
Seth Rich Bloomingdale2
On Tuesday Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of DNC staffer Seth rich.
Now this…
Julian Assange suggested on Tuesday that Seth Rich was a Wikileaks informant.
Via Mike Cernovich:
Hervé
15th August 2016, 13:05
WikiLeaks, Hillary-Gulen Intimate Ties & How the Clintons Gave Birth to Mullah Gulen’s Terrorist Network (http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/2016/08/12/wikileaks-hillary-gulen-intimate-ties-how-the-clintons-gave-birth-to-mullah-gulens-terrorist-network/)
Sibel Edmonds (http://www.boilingfrogspost.com/author/sibeldenizalt/) | August 12, 2016
tctl8FNasFo
In this episode of Spotlight with Sibel and Spiro we discuss the notorious USA-based Mullah Fethullah Gulen and Operation Gladio B in light of Wikileaks’ recent announcement that they plan to release a new batch of e-mails exposing the intimate ties between Hillary Clinton and Gulen’s 25+ Billion shady network.
Sibel Edmonds explains how Fethullah Gulen was brought into the United States during the Clinton Administration, and how Bill Clinton’s White House, the State Department and the Justice Department’s Janet Reno provided the infamous mullah and his terrorism-heroin operations with blanket immunity and protection.
We also take a look at Clinton’s hand-picked handlers, Graham Fuller and Mark Grossman, selected to manage and direct Gulen’s cells in the U.S. and abroad.
KiwiElf
15th August 2016, 13:15
Hacker Exposes George Soros, Thousands of Open Society Foundations Files Dumped
More than 2,500 files from the organizations run by billionaire George Soros have been leaked by hackers on the DC Leaks webpage just waiting to be combed through.
On Saturday, DC Leaks published hundreds of internal documents from the multiple departments of Soros controlled organizations, primarily from the Open Society Foundation, making available for the first time to the public the inner-workings of the mysterious world of the Hungarian billionaire who is often accused of manipulating elections and sewing dissent in order to reap profit on the markets.
Details & links at Hervé's thread here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?92568-Hacker-Exposes-George-Soros
Full leaked data here:
http://dcleaks.com/index.php/srs_reserves/
KiwiElf
3rd November 2016, 10:23
In light of what's "come out" in the last week (and still to come...), time to give this a BUMP - start with the first post on this thread :)
TEOTWAIKI
3rd November 2016, 13:27
Thanks, KiwiElf for bumping this; I missed it when first posted.
All the rumors surfacing now are in alignment with the OP back in July so the "insider" must really be an insider.
Really makes me wonder why the recent, sudden "about face" by the bureau.
Hervé
3rd November 2016, 14:38
What does it take to bring Hillary Clinton to justice? - Pepe Escobar (https://www.rt.com/op-edge/365204-clinton-us-investigation-justice/)
By Pepe Escobar
Published time: 3 Nov, 2016 11:35
Edited time: 3 Nov, 2016 11:36
Get short URL (http://on.rt.com/7tsk)
https://img.rt.com/files/2016.11/original/581b15a7c36188c2198b460a.JPG
U.S. Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton speaks at a campaign rally in Sanford, Florida, U.S. November 1, 2016. © Brian Snyder / Reuters
Virtually the whole planet holds its collective breath at the prospect of Hillary Clinton possibly becoming the next President of the United States (POTUS).
How’s that humanly possible, as the (daily) Bonfire of The Scandals – relentlessly fed by WikiLeaks revelations and now converging FBI investigations - can now be seen from interstellar space?
It’s possible because Hillary Clinton, slouching through a paroxysm of manufactured hysteria, is supported by virtually the whole US establishment, a consensual neocon/neoliberalcon War Party/Wall Street/corporate media axis.
But History has a tendency to show us there’s always a straw that breaks the camel’s back.
This could be it – as revealed by WikiLeaks (https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/41841); March 2, 2015, the day when John Podesta wrote, “we are going to have to dump all those emails.”
That happened to be the exact same day it was revealed (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/03/us/politics/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html?_r=1) Hillary Clinton had used a personal email server as Secretary of State.
Yet this reveals only part of the puzzle. There’s got to be a response to Podesta’s email – which WikiLeaks may, or may not, leak in the next few days before the election. If the back and forth clearly shows intent (to mislead), then we’ve got a 100 percent smoking gun: the whole Clinton (cash) machine narrative – according to which Hillary just deleted "personal" emails – crumbles like the ultimate House of Cards.
Moreover, that would unveil what was from the start the privileged Clinton machine strategy: to thwart the subsequent internal State Dept. and FBI investigations.
As far as the Clinton machine is concerned, an interlocking influence peddling pile up is the norm. John Podesta also happens to be the founder of the Center for American Progress – a George Soros operation and prime recruiting ground for Obama administration officials, including US Treasury operatives who decided which elite Too Big To Fail (TBTF) financial giants would be spared after the 2008 crisis. DCLeaks.com (http://dcleaks.com/), for its part, has connected Soros Open Society foundations to global funding rackets directly leading to subversion of governments and outright regime change (obviously sparing Clinton Foundation donors.)
Exceptional bananas, anyone?
The perfectly timed slow drip of WikiLeaks revelations, for the Clinton machine, feels like a sophisticated form of Chinese torture. To alleviate the pain, the relentless standard spin has been to change the subject, blame the messenger, and attribute it all to “evil” Russian hacking when the real source for the leaks might have come straight from (https://www.rt.com/news/365164-assange-interview-wikileaks-russia/) the belly of the (Washington) beast.
At the Valdai discussion club last week, it took President Putin (http://valdaiclub.com/events/posts/articles/vladimir-putin-took-part-in-the-valdai-discussion-club-s-plenary-session/) only a few sentences to debunk the whole Clinton machine narrative with a bang:
“Another mythical and imaginary problem is what I can only call the hysteria the USA has whipped up over supposed Russian meddling in the American presidential election. The United States has plenty of genuinely urgent problems, it would seem, from the colossal public debt to the increase in firearms violence and cases of arbitrary action by the police. You would think that the election debates would concentrate on these and other unresolved problems, but the elite has nothing with which to reassure society, it seems, and therefore attempt to distract public attention by pointing instead to supposed Russian hackers, spies, agents of influence and so forth.
I have to ask myself and ask you too: Does anyone seriously imagine that Russia can somehow influence the American people’s choice? America is not some kind of ‘banana republic’, after all, but is a great power. Do correct me if I am wrong.”
Reality, though, continues to insist on offering multiple, overlapping banana republic instances, configuring a giant black hole of transparency.
Anthropologist Janine Wedel has been one of the few in Clinton-linked US mainstream media acknowledging (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/clintons-latest-email-scandal-why-it-deserves-scrutiny_us_58177d54e4b08301d33e0cdb?24hp9z9vxqa6y9zfr) how Bill Clinton, while Hillary was Secretary of State, perfected his version of “philantro-capitalism” (actually a money laundering “pay to play” racket), a practice “by no means confined to the Clintons”.
And the racket prospered with inbuilt nuggets, such as Hillary being perfectly aware (http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/hillary-clinton-wikileaks-email-isis-saudi-arabia-qatar-us-allies-funding-barack-obama-knew-all-a7362071.html) that prime Clinton Foundation donors Qatar and Saudi Arabia were also financing ISIS/ISIL/Daesh.
Huma, the Fall Princess
Now, less than a week before the election, we have come to the crucial juncture where the WikiLeaks revelations are merging with the FBI investigations - all three of them.
Exhibit A is this WikiLeaks bombshell (https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43150#efmABWAB8ACiACqACvADUADXAIF); Peter Kadzik, who’s now in charge of the Department of Justice (DOJ) probe into the 650,000 emails found on the laptop shared by Clinton’s right-hand woman Huma Abedin and her estranged, pervert husband Anthony Wiener, is a Clinton asset.
Not only Kadzik was an attorney for Marc Rich when he was pardoned by Bill Clinton; Podesta – as also revealed by WikiLeaks - thanked Kadzik for keeping him “out of jail”; and it was Kadzik who gave Podesta a secret heads up (https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/43150#efmABWAB8ACiACqACvADUADXAIF) on the Clinton email investigation.
The Clinton machine, starring a self-described virtuous Madonna, is actually a pretty nasty business. Huma and her family’s close connections to Saudi Arabia – and the Muslim Brotherhood – are legendary (that includes her brother Hassan, who works for Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi). Podesta, by the way, is a handsomely remunerated lobbyist for Saudi Arabia in Washington; that’s part of the Clinton Foundation connection.
Yet now, with Huma in the spotlight – still maintaining she didn’t know all those emails were in her and Wiener’s laptop - it’s no wonder Hillary has instantly downgraded her, publicly, to “one of my aides”. She used to be (http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/01/huma-abedin-hillary-clinton-adviser) Hillary’s ersatz “daughter”; now she’s being framed as The Fall Princess.
And that brings us to the intersection of those three FBI investigations; on Hillary’s Subterranean Email Server (in theory closed by FBI’s Comey last summer); on the Clinton Foundation; and on Wiener’s sexting of minors. The FBI has been investigating the Clinton Foundation for over a year now. Let’s try to cut a long story short.
Follow the evidence
Last July, the DOJ – under Clinton/Obama asset Loretta Lynch - decided not to prosecute anyone on Emailgate. And yet FBI director Comey – who nonetheless stressed Hillary’s “extreme carelessness” – turbo-charged his no-denial mode on another investigation, as in the FBI “sought to refocus the Clinton Foundation probe.”
Soon we had Clinton Foundation FBI investigators trying to get access to all the emails turned over in the Emailgate investigation. The East District of New York refused it. Very important point; up to 2015, guess who was the US attorney at the East District; Clinton/Obama asset Lynch.
Enter an extra layer of legalese. Less than two months ago, the Clinton Foundation FBI investigators discovered they could not have access to any Emailgate material that was connected to immunity agreements.
But then, roughly a month ago, another FBI team captured the by now famous laptop shared by Huma and Wiener - using a warrant allowing only a probe on Weiner’s sexting of a 15-year-old girl. Subsequently they found Huma Abedin emails at all her accounts – from Humaabedin@yahoo.com to the crucial huma@clintonemail.com. This meant not only that Huma was forwarding State Dept. emails to her private accounts, but also that Hillary was sending emails from the “secret” clintonemail.com to Huma at yahoo.com.
No one knew for sure, but some of these emails might be duplicates of those the Clinton Foundation FBI investigators could not access because of the pesky immunity agreements.
What’s established by now is that the metadata in the Huma/Wiener laptop was duly examined. Now picture both teams of FBI investigators – Clinton Foundation and pervert Wiener – comparing notes. And then they decide Huma’s emails are “relevant”.
Key questions apply; and the most pressing is how the emails were deemed “relevant” if the investigators could only examine the metadata. What matters is that Comey certainly was made aware of the content of the emails – a potential game-changer. That’s why one of my sources insists (https://sputniknews.com/columnists/201610311046920348-clinton-fbi-november-surprise/) his decision to go public came from above.
The other key question now is whether the DOJ – via Kadzik? - will once again thwart another investigation, this time on the Clinton Foundation. Senior, serious FBI agents won’t take that – massive euphemism – kindly.
The FBI has been on the Clinton Foundation for over a year. Now, arguably, they are loaded with evidence – and they won’t quit. Winning the presidency now seems to be the least of Hillary Clinton’s Bonfire of Scandals’ problems.
=====================================================
http://i1262.photobucket.com/albums/ii610/WhiteCrowBlackDeer/help3_zpsoupbz7fo.gif
"Driver: Guantanamo flight!"
(rectified Miranda (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning)): "We have the right to make you spill the beans..."
:blushing:... sorry... day-dreaming about karma...
Hervé
5th November 2016, 15:56
Looking for a particular piece in Sue Arrigo's whistle-blowing articles (http://pauljackson.us/sue_arrigo/) submitted to Chairman Waxman (Committee on Oversight and Government Reform at http://oversight.house.gov/contact/), I ran into this one I had forgotten about and which gives an indication that Hillary will be walking handcuffs-free past Nov. 8th whereas her "enemies" will face prosecutions and/or attend their funerals from the viewpoint of their recent and permanent, bullet/poison induced, OBEs...
Introduction
Dear Chairman Waxman;
Thank you so much for your integrity and work exposing corruption.
I collected intelligence in Iraq and Afghanistan for the CIA until Aug. 2004 when I was outed by Cheney for refusing to make propaganda that Iran was developing nuclear weapons. My official title within the CIA was Special Operations Advisor to the Director of Central Intelligence. Since I set up the Remote Viewing Defense protocols for the Pentagon, I was given a title of Remote Viewing Advisor to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and a rank of a 2-star general in the US military. That rank was largely a bogus ploy by the Pentagon to get more of my time from the CIA and force me to attend a Joint Chiefs of Staff Meeting once a month. I did so from Oct. 2003 to July 2004.
On orders of my boss, DCI George Tenet, on Aug. 2001 I collected a moving van full of Pentagon documents showing Defense Contractor kickbacks to Pentagon officials. I removed them from the Pentagon and they were driven to the CIA. It took me about 10 days of time to get the Pentagon people to turn those documents over to me en masse. The ethical intelligence methods I used to do so are beyond the scope of this text. Alas, the CIA's intention turned out not to be to expose and correct the corruption, but to cover it up---as judged by later events.
Clearly I did not have time to read all of those documents in one week. My job was not to evaluate those documents and address the corruption, it was to run a "counter-intelligence" type of op to collect them. However, I did become aware of the depth of corruption during the course of the week and did read some of them. It is amazing what ended up in print because people in the Pentagon felt so immune from prosecution, esp. under Bush in the White House.
The main reason for collecting those documents, I believe in retrospect, was to allow CIA analysts to evaluate how to take business away from other US Defense Contractors and give it to Halliburton and Carlyle-related contractors. The mood at the CIA and Pentagon was "war is coming" because the Bush Family stands to make billions from it--so get ready. I did come across reports later which confirmed that the documents had been used in that fashion. That is, they were used to blackmail Pentagon officials into 'working on' the Halliburton-Carlyle team, or to judge how much to bribe them to switch to that team. So, on later reflection, I am afraid that my actions led to worse, not less, corruption. Certainly that corruption was not in the interests of the US public nor our country's national security interests.
[...]
Submitted to the Committee on Saturday May 17th, 2008:
Case 5: Was Rumsfeld Criminally Negligent in Protecting US Troops and National Security?
This is another case that grew out of my moving documents from the Pentagon to the CIA on DCI Tenet's orders in Aug. 2001. The cases that I am giving you are not a complete set of those that I was involved in. But I am selecting them to give you as complete an understanding as this overview format can. This was a case that I started addressing while collecting the documents in Aug. 2001. It was brought to my attention by a Colonel at the Pentagon who handed me a stack of documents ON THE CONDITION THAT I WOULD READ THEM THAT NIGHT. It was a pretty big stack, over an inch high. It took me until 4 am in the morning before a had a firm grasp on the case he had handed me.
Since I was in an office at the Pentagon, it was easy for me to immediately start investigating it. The hour was late, but that was a good time to look for and collect the computer files and other documents that I wanted to go with the Colonel's documents.
By morning, I had had no sleep, but I had collected much evidence and laid it in the inbox the desk of the Pentagon's Criminal Investigation Unit's Head. The amount of evidence was over 2 inches high of documents and 4 computer discs, one of which was from the accounting office.
The Colonel who had handed me that case then spent all morning in that office giving that Head his eye-witness testimony on the case. That testimony covered only one fourth of the case, and I sent in another 3 Pentagon officials in the afternoon to flesh the rest of the case out. Having the rank of a 2-star general was essential to that effort. It would not have happened had I not out ranked the Head of the Criminal Investigation Unit at the Pentagon as he was loath to investigate. It would also not have happened had I not personally breathed down his neck repeatedly during the day by going in person to check how he was doing. Each time I came by I insisted that he give me a full briefing on his investigations so far. I did that 4 times over the course of the day.
I did not dictate the content of his investigation, but I did insist that he be vigorous in it. I mention this practical framework of the case because I am mainly interested in the larger issue that these cases were not getting resolved. Thus I have so far in this case given none of the specifics of the case to avoid distraction by them. The Colonel giving me the case had been to that Criminal Investigation Unit several times previously to file complaints. He was never satisfied that they were investigated. I was able to confirm that. Each time the investigations were dead ended. It was clear to me by the end of the day that the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Pentagon was professionally dedicated to covering up corruption, not investigating or correcting it. I later took some steps to make sure that that was not due to Russian, Chinese, or foreign interventions to harm US National Security.
That I did have a mandate to do from the CIA wherever I went on assignment. That mandate had been put in place by an executive order of President Clinton. It could not be over-ridden except by a duly elected President. Thus, I had some discretion to act outside of the direct orders of the Director of CIA, Tenet, or the Chief of the JCS. But I could not press that beyond the limits at which it would break due to political practices. In the process of that investigation of possible foreign influence behind the corruption, I ran across a wide-reaching high-level conspiracy to defraud the US taxpayer. I will be delineating that further in this series of about 12 cases.
The documents that the Colonel had handed me were on the development and purchasing of a new free-standing artillery unit. If you have not already seen the painfully funny movie/documentary, Pentagon Wars (1989) on the Pentagon's approval of the Bradley troop carrier, I recommend that you watch it. This case was remarkably similar. The weapon, a piece of artillery, did not work as well as an older brand and it was dangerous to use. Two men had died in the testing of it. But the Pentagon kept on ordering it. The Colonel knew that the problem had to be kickbacks as there was no other rational explanation of it. But without that proof the case had been repeatedly closed as 'unfounded'. He did not have the espionage background needed to to able to collect that evidence. As a result he was stymied.
By morning I had been able to lay financial transactions on the top of the inbox. They showed that at least 2 generals had accepted kickbacks straight into their US bank accounts from that company. Those transactions occurred in the week after they voted to buy more of those artillery pieces. The amounts of the transactions were large relative to their salaries which is how the CIA gages the effectiveness of bribes. Any amount greater that 15% of a person's monthly salary is almost certain to have swayed their decision making processes. In each case, the amount of the transaction was more than the general made in a month!
A CIA officer accepting that amount of money from the KGB or a foreign source would likely have had a bullet put through his body by the CIA, or been tried for treason. Yet, at the Pentagon these kinds of actions were largely tolerated, as if they did not undermine National Security. That was not at all the case. In order to fight a war effectively the equipment has to work and be safe to use. Selling a secret to a foreign power might or might not make a difference in the outcome of a war; not having good equipment was sure to make a difference. In this case, the company making the artillery was a foreign one and the generals had been paid from a foreign bank. It certainly should have raised a red flag in anyone's mind. The CIA should have immediately been called in to investigate. But they had not been. Some months previously the Colonel had put in a complaint to Rumsfeld about the lack of investigation by the Pentagon's Criminal Investigation Unit on this case. In it he had cited the fact that the company making the artillery was a foreign one and raised the issue as to whether it was a deliberate attempt to sabotage US National Security by selling them 'worthless junk'. He had asked Rumsfeld refer the matter to the CIA. That had not happened.
By afternoon, I had the financial records to show that 5 generals had gotten large kickbacks from that foreign company in the week after the vote. In addition, I had the signed confession of one of those men. I did not use threats or torture to get it. I did use friendly persuasion. Not only did he confess, but he admitted in writing that there was a conspiracy to ensure that that group of generals got the kickbacks.
They had met not just once, but at least twice to conspire on how to ensure that the order went through. Rumsfeld had cancelled a competing meeting that dealt with National Security issues without explanation. That allowed 2 further generals to attend the second meeting. There were 6 generals at that second meeting, if I remember correctly. The next day they quietly resigned in the face of the investigation. One of them told me privately but refused to put it in writing that Rumsfeld had cancelled the competing meeting 'in order for us to organize and get that artillery approved' for Pentagon purchasing.
The next day, that Colonel brought me 10 similar cases, since I had solved that one to his satisfaction. It was my last day at the Pentagon on the assignment to pick up the documents Tenet ordered I collect. I did not have time while at the Pentagon to solve them, so I undertook to mentor the Colonel in how to collect the evidence of bribes. During the course of that day he managed to collect evidence well enough to resolve one of those ten cases ad hoc. The guilty party also quietly resigned. He had also been bribed by a foreign company. At least in that case the product worked. It was not a case of the Pentagon ordering the product. It was a case of the guilty party selling them on the black market from his office inside the Pentagon to other Pentagon officials.
The product was a foreign lap-top computer. Military secrets were almost sure to be put on them given the location that they were sold on. They had not been vetted by the Pentagon to ensure that they did not have a back door on them to transmit information back to that country. They were popular at the Pentagon for their advanced conference video call capacities. I took one of them back to the CIA with me where it was verified that the laptop did have the function of acting like an advanced bug to steal files, audio, and photographic images. The optics on it were advanced enough to read documents off the desk of and wall behind the user! It automatically turned itself on and focused on text. Even before I verified that the laptop had been designed to steal military secrets, it was clear from the outer circumstances that that was likely to be the case. Otherwise, why not sell it in some other location? The laptop cost a lot more with those advanced spy systems on it than a regular user could afford. That was why it was only offered for sale inside the Pentagon--the foreign country was paying so that it could be sold very cheaply and out compete other laptops at the Pentagon. About 500 of those laptops had already been sold at the Pentagon. The Colonel had pressed the Criminal Investigation Unit to investigate those black market sales. They had not, nor had the matter been referred to the CIA for investigation.
The Criminal Investigation Unit was not willing to press charges even after being presented with the evidence that the Pentagon official had taken a foreign bribe! I could not press the issue any further because Rumsfeld had over ruled me. He had already sent the Head of the JCS down to the Criminal Investigation Unit's Head to tell him not to prosecute the 6 Generals. I had called Rumseld while he was in his office to protest that--he refused to take my call. Rumsfeld nixed prosecution of our cases but we still managed to get the resignations. Rumsfeld blocking the prosecutions gave an ongoing green light to corruption at the Pentagon.
I did collect the evidence that Rumsfeld sent General Shelton, Chief of the JCS down to prevent the prosecution of the 6 generals. I collected a copy of Rumsfeld's phone call to Shelton. In addition, I collected the security camera evidence that General Shelton promptly went down and talked to the Head of the Criminal Investigation Unit. Alas, the audio on it was not useable. However, the action that the Head took in not prosecuting the 6 generals or the laptop selling official speaks for itself as the evidence.
In addition, I collected evidence that that Head of Criminal Investigations had not prosecuted a number of other corruption cases in which the evidence of guilt was abundant and solid. Furthermore, I had collected a van load of corruption related documents which proved that corruption was wide spread at the Pentagon. My orders from Tenet were to deliver those documents to the CIA. There was nothing in those orders that prevented me from xeroxing as many of them as I could without delaying that delivery past the time that Tenet had requested delivery.
I had been in the espionage business collecting documents for over thirty years. When doing so will aid National Security, one has a duty to collect them and try to deal with them in a way that accomplishes that goal. It should therefore not surprise anyone, that I had ALL of them xeroxed during the course of the 10 days that they were collected. That is, although it was clear to me that I could not get the corruption appropriately dealt with at the Pentagon, I still had hopes to one day be able to somehow succeed.
There were a number of moving vans removing documents from the Pentagon on that day. I had already stated that this was only one of three categories that Tenet ordered me to collect. I thus had the cover to load one van full of the copies of the corruption documents. The question was where to send it to get the corruption cases prosecuted. I did not have a good answer to that. I sent it to an Army base where I trusted the integrity of the commander to secure it, until I did have a good answer. I believe it is still intact at that Army base.
The cases, many of them, have grown old. But as I looked into the matter of how to get them prosecuted, the facts were not encouraging. The White House was against it. My boss Tenet was against it. Rumsfeld was against it. The Head of the JCS was against it and the later replacement not for it either. The Justice Dept. had not investigated the obvious Halliburton corruption and put them out of business and some of their personnel in prison, as it should have on the evidence. In short, there was no mechanism by which to get them prosecuted because the corruption was being protected from the top.
That dismal state of affairs is barely better today than it was in Aug. 2001. So, why bring any of these cases to your attention at all? I believe that that state of affairs will change soon. I have hope that the US will regain its claim to be a civilized nation and require its leaders and officials to be honest and free of corruption.
I have no doubt that when the legal system starts to prosecute corruption appropriately, that the Commander of that US military base will turn over that van load of documents to it. Until then there is no reason to do so given the risk that they could be shredded or burned. It was my duty to my country to protect the evidence of the corruption to the best of my ability until said time that it could be appropriately acted upon. It is a sad chapter of history that it has been almost 7 years in which it was not reasonably likely that would happen.
Because I wanted to make progress towards a day in which those cases would be handled appropriately, I handed the evidence over on Rumsfeld blocking the investigations. Before I left the Pentagon I sent that evidence by courier to the Director of the FBI. Rumsfeld's corruption was happening in the United States and it was within the jurisdiction of the FBI, not the CIA to follow through on it. When the FBI did not act to enforce the law appropriately, that was more evidence of a conspiracy at levels above Rumseld to allow corruption.
[...]
Up to this point in this case, I have omitted all the defining details of those two combined cases in which it was clear that Rumsfeld should have referred to the CIA for investigation and should have been prosecuted for corruption. Now I will fill in some of those details.
The maker of the artillery was part of the Carlyle Group. That was a clear conflict of interest for a sitting President to be making money off of weapons that were being sold to the Pentagon.
[...]
The artillery was manufactured by a Saudi Arabian company with close business ties to the Bush Family. They were having financial trouble because they could not find a market for their products. Their products had a bad reputation in the Defense Industry. A video clip I watched at the CIA which showed their table set up at an outdoor Defense Contractor's Weapon Expo in Saudi Arabia showed that people purposely avoided stopping to look at their table. It was not a subtle finding. The table next to theirs was doing a brisk business....
[...]
As to the laptop case, the company making it was Japanese. I believe that the motivation was not to undermine US National Security but for the purposes of industrial espionage--to best position them to sell computer and electronic products to the Pentagon. But I can not prove that. The case is quite troubling in light of the violation of US National Security. Rumsfeld, by not investigating and prosecuting corruption cases, left the Pentagon open to any agent of a foreign power with money in their pocket. Thus his actions which disabled US National Security in practice had both active and passive components.
Nations fall easily due to corruption from within. Without corruption from within, they are hard to defeat even in battle. With corruption within, often no battle is needed to take them over. Corruption is an extremely serious violation of National Security as this combined case shows.
I did brief my boss DCI Tenet on my findings above after I had determined their National Security implications. He showed no great interest in my presentation and rushed off in the middle of it. He twice declined my invitation to reschedule that briefing. It was clear that he had no intention of seriously trying to correct the problems even as related to the foreign penetration problems at the Pentagon.
End of Case 5
Full article: Case 1-17 at http://pauljackson.us/sue_arrigo/
ThePythonicCow
28th December 2018, 00:30
This same material arose again, over on the Qanon thread, in late December 2018. See for example this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?100318-The-Qanon-posts-and-a-Very-Bad-Day-Scenario-for-some-elite-swamp-critters&p=1266214&viewfull=1#post1266214), in which norman remembered that we had discussed this material over two years earlier, on the above thread.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.