PDA

View Full Version : The Link Between BREXIT & the Death Penalty



boja
17th July 2016, 06:42
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-36803544

"If you look at attitudes to questions such as, 'Do you think criminals should be publicly whipped?' or 'Are you in favour of the death penalty?' - those things are much better predictors, and you get over 70% accuracy," he says.

The above from today's BBC website.

happyuk
17th July 2016, 07:11
That's the biased statist BBC up to its usual tricks the fact is that Brexit meant different things to different people. What the BBC is doing is trying to smear Leave supporters as a bunch of reactionary dinosaurs with no regard for life

Snoweagle
17th July 2016, 07:33
Do we think that those in high office should be hanged for treason then the overwhelming answer I believe would be "Yes".

Do we think the co-conspirators perpetrating mentoring of treason should be hanged would also be "Yes".

England now (as is most of the Western world) is a Jewish conclave of the Jewish Economic Empire and the Gentiles will now be conditioned, as that is what the Semitic BBC's role is, to butcher and maim one another. Whether in the community or judicial punishment.

Torture is now the favourite topic in Media broadcasting and Political congress. Debasement of society is the only thing the BBC has to offer the world.

The very first thing I did after my stroke, eight years ago, was to pick up my television and take it to the dump. I cancelled my television subscription and have never looked back.

Only retards and people with the intellect of donkey poo watch television. If that comment offends you, I will simply ask "what did you do today?". Watching television is not "doing" anything.

So torture requires separation within society, difference and hardship enforcing denial for swathes of the community from basic necessities for life. Mankind (the Gentiles) will rebel. Then they will be punished by which ever chosen method from whichever religious faction holds court.

Personally, I will only agree sanction to the death penalty, if and only if, Tony Blair and Lord Levy are the first to hang in public and their heads removed and stuck on spikes. I want a seat at the front. If necessary I will volunteer personally to conduct the execution free of charge.

Otherwise I will not sanction any form of physical harm on any criminal or rather any person deemed by this corrupt government to have committed a crime when it is they that should form at the front on any queue for punishment.
__________________________________________________________

When I voted for Brexit I knew this was coming. I want to see the looks on the English faces when they realise how their country has been taken over by weakness and greed of the "nodders" in Freemasonry and Civil Service. Both protected and assured longish lives for doing as they are told.

Everyone else will suffer and suffer unimaginable hardship and pain.

TWATS - Those Whom Are Taught Sytematically

Religious bigots, Main stream Media and Golden Pensions. The new modern age Gestapo.

If you wondered why Theresa May is now Prime Minister, she was the one that destroyed privacy here in the UK. She was mentored by the dark hand of the acolytes of Goldman Sachs.

The Devolution Act appears to have been passed so a range of cities are now Privately Owned Community Prisons and can imagineer there own solutions to their perceived problems.

These devolved cities have been sold to offshore corporations which will drive there growth by economic reference. If you can pay, you can stay. If you can't, you die. Now you know why these biowaste incinerators have been built across the country INSIDE military establishments.

How's the telly working for you? (rhetorical)

sheme
17th July 2016, 07:57
For me it was about common courtesy or rather the lack of deference shown to individual countries representatives - in our diversity lies our strength, the orders from above- to melt us all down, do as we are told or lump it- I voted to lump it.

Europe is a body each part of the body is designed to have an individual function, the lungs are filled with air, the stomach is filled with food, the heart is filled with blood etc. We are not the same, no amount of forced integration will change this, it can only destroy that which stands each individual country in good stead.

If other countries of the world flock to Europe because they appreciate our freedoms they should stay in their own countries and change their own societies and create their own freedoms, not run from the tyrants that would enslave them, but stay and reject them, it starts with respect for women children and animals, without these basics no country can be free and decent.

Sunny-side-up
17th July 2016, 10:51
Snoweagle I only read down your post as far as below quote.
It's quite mad how the general population reacts and responds,
they very dangerous!
if they believe it's the status-quo way to be , then they will be that way (Sheeple)
To be like us, we are mad because we are not in the flock or wan't to be, as is 0.o


Do we think that those in high office should be hanged for treason then the overwhelming answer I believe would be "Yes".

Do we think the co-conspirators perpetrating mentoring of treason should be hanged would also be "Yes".



"Do we think that those in high office should be hanged for treason then the overwhelming answer I believe would be "Yes".
Well they should face very hi and long penalty's for such acts while in positions of trust and power, yes (Death no)


"Do we think the co-conspirators perpetrating mentoring of treason should be hanged would also be "Yes".
No, we have to be very careful what you ask for, only the other day I saw 'David Icke' being sited for 'treason' because of his views, views like many here in Avalon, those in power (PTW) will see such people in that way, so no to 'death Penalty'

They would bring back the Coliseum if they could (And really enjoy it)
Just think how that would make mony and power for the likes of the BBC
They could parade out their new made genetic monsters to deal out the entertainment/torture etc
They must be stopped!

Bump

sheme
For me it was about common courtesy or rather the lack of deference shown to individual countries representatives - in our diversity lies our strength, the orders from above- to melt us all down, do as we are told or lump it- I voted to lump it.

Europe is a body each part of the body is designed to have an individual function, the lungs are filled with air, the stomach is filled with food, the heart is filled with blood etc. We are not the same, no amount of forced integration will change this, it can only destroy that which stands each individual country in good stead.

If other countries of the world flock to Europe because they appreciate our freedoms they should stay in their own countries and change their own societies and create their own freedoms, not run from the tyrants that would enslave them, but stay and reject them, it starts with respect for women children and animals, without these basics no country can be free and decent.

It is good to have individual cultures for different countries, it all helps the color of the painting. It all helps to stop one rule madness.

We could have a one unity as governed by sane and kind people, non of whom would use death penalty.

Those who voted for Brexit are no more mad or hurtful those those who voted stay in, Dang PTB BBC's of the world

Snoweagle
17th July 2016, 12:43
@ Sunny-side up Actually Tony Blair removed the very mechanisms of the death penalty for treason before he made his legal changes at the guidance of his Zionist mentors. So I disagree with your tenet that the perpetrators should be treated with kid gloves and do a short spell in prison. The death penalty which had stood for centuries for just this reason prevented the coups d'état of of England until Blair and his cronies arrived.

Bring back the death penalty for treason. This law should be on the statute books for every country in the world.

Your comparison with David Icke is wholly invalid or the open and free speech of the population. You attempt to muddy the waters by labelling everybody with complaints against the Scum that set themselves above the rights of the average person in the street. This is a common and typical ploy of Zionist arguments. Blair and his consorts deliberately with prior intent removed the peoples protection before forcing through legislation on the back of threats to Society members.

England and it's language is a bastard in virtually every sense of the word. It has been populated from virtually every country in the world before Blair activated the changes. It is probably the most diverse mix of people on the planet but one group above all others have taken his weakness and driven his ego to violate the natural and common law values this country had and destroyed them under the prospective genocide of economics.

You quote:
1. It is good to have individual cultures for different countries, it all helps the color of the painting. It all helps to stop one rule madness. Really, tell that to Israel. Tell that to Switzerland. Both are harbingers of the European desolation invoked by the drive and determination of these economic policies. Millions are dying as result, cultures are being destroyed yet those two countries allied to those city states of the Vatican, Washington and the City of London are instrumental in this Zionist madness.

2. We could have a one unity as governed by sane and kind people, non of whom would use death penalty. Such hypocrisy. In a nation of sane and kind people which England once was the death penalty protected them and kept the order which satisfied the nation. There were very few problems that the populace couldn't resolve amongst themselves. So this comment of yours actually endorses the return of the death penalty. Thank you.

3. They have already brought back the Coliseum in it's current digital form by MSM globally and in particular the BBC. The BBC is entirely run by Zionist directives to debase the intellectuality of the population and in some ways it has worked and others not. Many people, like me, have given up television and see it for what it is, a criminal cartel behaving like a bully preacher dumbing everybody down. It isn't fit for purpose. There was a time when the BBC used the broadcast dead time to present University course modules for the Open University but that was stopped for groundless economic reasons. The Zionists did not and do not want an educated nation. They failed.

So Sunny-side up, I stand alone in my views in that I seek no mantra from others to state the wrongs of this world and I do not use pathetic comparisons, singling out isolated defamations to drive my arguments. I leave that to Zion.

Ernie Nemeth
17th July 2016, 17:27
To be absolutely fair, there should be only two verdicts possible for any supposed transgression: freedom or death. This way people would really have to want to punish someone, and the uneven terms in prison would be abolished. No one should have to spend six months in court just to satisfy the system's penchant for abuse, only to have the charges dropped. The legal system should be revamped. It is not morally correct to use so-called justice as a means for revenge because revenge is not justice.

By removing all forms of punishment except for the death penalty we would be forced to seek for the root causes of transgressions against society and eradicate them instead of punishing those placed in a position where they must choose between right action or following the law. Any fine hurts but any fine hurts some much more than others. Is that fair? For example, I personally have had well over thirty thousand dollars in fines in this society. I can't recover from that, and haven't.

So, you wanna punish the bastards that made this world a sack of crap? Fine. Kill them all! Or leave them be and remember that we each have a part in this mess and none of us are innocent.

Only forgiveness will solve the true problems of this world. All its problems can be summed up in five words: the savage lust for revenge. What stops a family feud? Forgiveness. Nothing else, aside from the eradication of all family members on both sides. Get it?

Snoweagle
17th July 2016, 18:54
To be absolutely fair, there should be only two verdicts possible for any supposed transgression: freedom or death. This way people would really have to want to punish someone, and the uneven terms in prison would be abolished. No one should have to spend six months in court just to satisfy the system's penchant for abuse, only to have the charges dropped. The legal system should be revamped. It is not morally correct to use so-called justice as a means for revenge because revenge is not justice.

By removing all forms of punishment except for the death penalty we would be forced to seek for the root causes of transgressions against society and eradicate them instead of punishing those placed in a position where they must choose between right action or following the law. Any fine hurts but any fine hurts some much more than others. Is that fair? For example, I personally have had well over thirty thousand dollars in fines in this society. I can't recover from that, and haven't.

So, you wanna punish the bastards that made this world a sack of crap? Fine. Kill them all! Or leave them be and remember that we each have a part in this mess and none of us are innocent.

Only forgiveness will solve the true problems of this world. All its problems can be summed up in five words: the savage lust for revenge. What stops a family feud? Forgiveness. Nothing else, aside from the eradication of all family members on both sides. Get it?

Taken as said and I do agree with your sentiments.

However, I strongly believe that the death penalty for treason at government level for our elected officials should be reinstated. Not for societal misbehaviours but for those elected whom have conditioned our trust. Without that protection we would be fools to elect anybody to the position of custodianship of our culture and heritage.

You spew "forgiveness" for Tony Blair by whose actions is directly responsible for millions of dead! And you argue peace and love by forgiveness as he wanders the world creaming a fortune educating others in the mechanisms of his slaughter.

Sorry Ernie, we are sort of on the same page, I too draw a line at the use of corporal punishment but unlike you I have a threshold that Blair and others in his world of dominion should pay for their abuse.

Sunny-side-up
17th July 2016, 20:44
I personally say the death penalty is to kind and quick for such people, a life of hard labor better suite.

Die/killed reborn, do it again, in other words they will get away.
While you have them identified keep um locked up and suffering!

There is far too much death on this planet, we don't need more even if it is thought of as a just reason :(

Ernie Nemeth
17th July 2016, 23:41
I don't spew anything, my friend. I was merely stating a fact as I see it. That said, I am for corporal punishment for some, of course. Read between the lines. Right now, a third of the populace goes to work each day with one intent: to define a sub-group, their transgression, and the subsequent fines and penalties to be associated with its infraction. Either that or they concoct new regulations, licenses and fees to round everyone into one house. These are the people who sit next to us on the bus, the army of governmental bureaucrats whose only function is to implement regulations, follow the book and to single out offending citizens to fleece.

Almost all of today's rules apply and were invented because of some inequity in the system that for whatever reason cannot be addressed directly. The rule and regulation enforces a stance that allows inequities to continue to exist, and the unfair system to continue business as usual, no one the wiser to yet another problem that has been swept under the rug.

If suffering is the intent of any recompense then the suffering in our world will continue, simple as that.

End it with a bullet and few words.

Then get on with important matters and let the healing begin.

Flash
18th July 2016, 00:38
you must be living in Ottawa - or Quebec City!!! the arny of bureaucrast sitting on the bus every morning.... (of course, I am teasing, although I think that what you write is pretty accurate for many cities)


I don't spew anything, my friend. I was merely stating a fact as I see it. That said, I am for corporal punishment for some, of course. Read between the lines. Right now, a third of the populace goes to work each day with one intent: to define a sub-group, their transgression, and the subsequent fines and penalties to be associated with its infraction. Either that or they concoct new regulations, licenses and fees to round everyone into one house. These are the people who sit next to us on the bus, the army of governmental bureaucrats whose only function is to implement regulations, follow the book and to single out offending citizens to fleece.

Almost all of today's rules apply and were invented because of some inequity in the system that for whatever reason cannot be addressed directly. The rule and regulation enforces a stance that allows inequities to continue to exist, and the unfair system to continue business as usual, no one the wiser to yet another problem that has been swept under the rug.

If suffering is the intent of any recompense then the suffering in our world will continue, simple as that.

End it with a bullet and few words.

Then get on with important matters and let the healing begin.

rgray222
18th July 2016, 00:50
The media will continue to denigrate those that voted to leave for quite a bit longer. Calling them working class, death penalty advocates and any other demeaning term they can think of. In the mean time Britain's exit has made the EU do a major rethink on immigration and it's purpose and role in the world. Something that was very much needed. Also other leaders around the world such as Obama will attempt to punish Britain for a while longer but at the end of the day England will have the last laugh. Britain is no longer hamstrung by archaic rules and regulation that hamper life in general.

In an increasingly networked and interdependent world, the more successful societies are those that allow more decentralized decision making, by harnessing and balancing opposing forces. Britain’s refusal to be reconciled into the EU is not ultimately anything to do with flags or anthems. The EU was meant to be an engine for economic development, it was never never meant to driving force behind politics. The EU was a power grab by the European elites and thank goodness the "working class" in Britain saw it for what it was.

As the Brits economic engine begins to pick up steam, I suspect we will begin to see other countries who will soon be demanding the freedom to opt out.

Ernie Nemeth
18th July 2016, 13:04
you must be living in Ottawa - or Quebec City!!! the arny of bureaucrast sitting on the bus every morning

Well it could be any city. And it could be the person in the car in front of you in the traffic jam. Or the one eating lunch next to you. Their job is to constrain, confine, restrict, and harass - otherwise innocent civilians. No group is safe, no majority secure. They'll come for you eventually...

Callista
18th July 2016, 14:29
http://images.dailykos.com/images/272403/story_image/BrexitCat.jpg?1468188550

Sunny-side-up
18th July 2016, 15:41
Callista thx for your above post, luv it :sun:

and so full of wisdom aswell!