Galactic Connection Show 19th July 2016 - Simon Parkes Responds To The Community

[Star Tsar]

Galactic Connection

Simon Parkes Responds To The Community

Published 19th July 2016

Simon Parkes responds to the community namely regarding concerns made on this fine forum

DS16bA91qi4

[Bill Ryan]

.
Did he mention this? (A genuine question: I won't have to listen to the video. Bulletpoint summary appreciated.)

http://projectavalon.net/Simon_Parkes_public_apology_6_June_2016_sm.jpg

[EWO]

Yes i believe he did.

[RunningDeer]

.
Did he mention this? (A genuine question: I won't have to listen to the video. Bulletpoint summary appreciated.)

I haven’t listened to the above video, but it’s covered in this one @ 4:18 (https://youtu.be/SOg0mp0AkVI?t=4m18s) and goes on for about 10 minutes. No bullet points and I'm not sure if the topic comes up again during the Q&A.

UPDATE: see post #14 (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91971-Galactic-Connection-Show-19th-July-2016-Simon-Parkes-Responds-To-The-Community&p=1082999&viewfull=1#post1082999) for transcript.


2016-07-17 Simon Parkes Q&AII
SOg0mp0AkVI

[onawah]

I would highly recommend that anyone who really wants to understand what's been going on with Simon listen to the interview with Alexandra.
DS16bA91qi4
:bump:
It will no doubt stir up some more controversy and disagreement, but I think it will also help to affect something of a positive "reset" for a good part of the community.

[Sierra]

Too soft. I'm deaf. Going to be very lazy and wait for RunningDeer's :heart: bullet point summary...
:cantina:

[onawah]

There are two different interviews. The bullet point will be for the interview with Jay Pee, much of which is Simon answering callers' questions. The other one, with Alexandra, goes into a lot of detail about Simon's breaking with Anu, but is also a discussion of recent events on Avalon.

[RunningDeer]

Too soft. I'm deaf. Going to be very lazy and wait for RunningDeer's :heart: bullet point summary...
:cantina:
http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Recovered/bench-newspaper_zpskuf4gz34.GIF
Noooooo! http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Recovered/moonwalk1_zpsneeacnmj.GIFhttp://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Recovered/moonwalk2_zpsq9tar6s1.GIF RunningDeer slips out the back.

No plan for bullet points. This one is really, really loud and I provided a quick link (https://youtu.be/SOg0mp0AkVI?t=4m18s) that takes you right to where Simon explains the gist of it in 10 minutes. Note I haven't gotten much further in the video because I'm flipping from one to the other.

@ 4:18 (https://youtu.be/SOg0mp0AkVI?t=4m18s) for about 10 minutes.

UPDATE: see post #14 (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91971-Galactic-Connection-Show-19th-July-2016-Simon-Parkes-Responds-To-The-Community&p=1082999&viewfull=1#post1082999) for transcript.


2016-07-17 Simon Parkes Q&AII
SOg0mp0AkVI

[onawah]

He also talks about the many cyber attacks on him, the cell tower mast next to his house ( Win Keech measured the microwaves which were off the charts), what psychic readings and deprogramming involve as opposed to mainstream therapy/counseling, etc. and much more.

There are two different interviews. The bullet point will be for the interview with Jay Pee, much of which is Simon answering callers' questions. The other one, with Alexandra, goes into a lot of detail about Simon's breaking with Anu, but is also a discussion of recent events on Avalon.

[Sierra]

Too soft. I'm deaf. Going to be very lazy and wait for RunningDeer's :heart: bullet point summary...
:cantina:
http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Recovered/bench-newspaper_zpskuf4gz34.GIF
Noooooo! http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Recovered/moonwalk1_zpsneeacnmj.GIFhttp://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Recovered/moonwalk2_zpsq9tar6s1.GIF RunningDeer stealthily slips out the back.

No plan for bullet points. This one is really, really loud and I provided a quick link (https://youtu.be/SOg0mp0AkVI?t=4m18s) that takes you right to where Simon explains the gist of it in 10 minutes. Note I haven't gotten much further in the video because I'm flipping from one to the other.

@ 4:18 (https://youtu.be/SOg0mp0AkVI?t=4m18s) for about 10 minutes.


2016-07-17 Simon Parkes Q&AII
SOg0mp0AkVI


That's okay! I didn't mean to stress you out! Ignore me! :heart: :bearhug: :heart:

[RunningDeer]

That's okay! I didn't mean to stress you out! Ignore me! :heart: :bearhug: :heart:
http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Recovered/smileys-smiley-with-sign-071744_zpszlbmiquj.GIFSierra http://avalonlibrary.net/paula/Recovered/smileys-hugs-765537_zpso1eaenyy.gif

[Innocent Warrior]

I've come to see clearly the arrogance and ignorance of anyone (including myself) judging any other human being. A human personality alone is complex, without taking in to account other dynamic factors. It seems those who are fit to judge with any accuracy never do, and those who do are not even close to being fit to. So, please know that I do not judge Simon or anyone else, despite what may arise in my mind, which I have come to accept as natural while being a human in the condition of these times, but have promised myself not to honour anymore. There's too much judgement around and too much fear of being judged, and it holds us back from being as honest as we could be. I hope this changes.

I am frustrated and disappointed by what I heard in the interview in the OP and stopped listening about half way through. Simon has contradicted himself again.

Simon wrote (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88999-Our-experience-with-Simon-Parkes-as-a-counselor&p=1048562&viewfull=1#post1048562) -


It's such a shame that I've not even had the time to visit Avalon as I would like.

Now he says he is not a part of Avalon for other reasons. Well everyone is entitled to their opinion, each individual will have their own experience and make whatever they do of it, Simon's opinion itself is not the issue here, the issue is that he has contradicted himself again.

Why do I care? Because experiencers like me who don't have an advanced psychic sight as people like Simon claim to have, are encouraged when we come across someone who appears to have much more access to the truth of what's going on. Perhaps we'll find a gem that answers a question we have, perhaps an insight may inch us a little closer to the truth of what the hell is going on here. We're not stupid, not gullible, just searching and hoping and trusting to whatever extent we see fit, which does vary of course.

Contradictions are frustrating for me because we're never going to see the bottom of this through muddy waters and muddy waters are never going to be purified by people who contradict themselves, or by people's reasons for past actions/non actions shifting due to a current climate. This is very disappointing, I had found some of Simon's information helpful, now it's not reliable, for me.

I hope I've expressed myself clearly enough, I don't feel I have, I'm trying to offer an example of why it's important that people in the spotlight become more responsible with the truth, to have more respect for the truth.

Please consider the effects of these muddy waters, we don't have time to keep purifying them.

I mean no harm. I hope the people who have been hurt by such situations can move on as being stronger and wiser for it, including Simon. Much love.

[onawah]

I think that Simon may have meant that he regrets he didn't have more time to spend on Avalon before--from his perspective--the energies changed here.
It seems to me that recently if we don't use EXACTLY the right words to express ourselves, we are invariably misunderstood, and most often with very negative results.
The instinct to attack and find fault has been growing, at a time when I think we need above all to be more understanding and forgiving.
I think if you listen to the rest of the OP, Innocent Warrior, you will be pleasantly surprised at Simon's sincerity.
This doesn't mean that he hasn't made mistakes, just as we all do, but he's admitting to them, trying to make peace and to go on from there, though not taking the blame for things he doesn't feel responsible for.
Which is certainly a lot wiser than remaining stuck in anger, judgement, self-flagellation, etc.
There's enough of all that kind of negativity already to go around.
We all have a lot of healing to do.
Best to get on with it.


I've come to see clearly the arrogance and ignorance of anyone (including myself) judging any other human being. A human personality alone is complex, without taking in to account other dynamic factors. It seems those who are fit to judge with any accuracy never do, and those who do are not even close to being fit to. So, please know that I do not judge Simon or anyone else, despite what may arise in my mind, which I have come to accept as natural while being a human in the condition of these times, but have promised myself not to honour anymore. There's too much judgement around and too much fear of being judged, and it holds us back from being as honest as we could be. I hope this changes.

I am frustrated and disappointed by what I heard in the interview in the OP and stopped listening about half way through. Simon has contradicted himself again.

Simon wrote (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88999-Our-experience-with-Simon-Parkes-as-a-counselor&p=1048562&viewfull=1#post1048562) -


It's such a shame that I've not even had the time to visit Avalon as I would like.

Now he says he stopped coming because the energy here is vicious. Well everyone is entitled to their opinion, each individual will have their own experience and make whatever they do of it, Simon's opinion itself is not the issue here, the issue is that he has contradicted himself again.

Why do I care? Because experiencers like me who don't have an advanced psychic sight as people like Simon claim to have, are encouraged when we come across someone who appears to have much more access to the truth of what's going on. Perhaps we'll find a gem that answers a question we have, perhaps an insight may inch us a little closer to the truth of what the hell is going on here. We're not stupid, not gullible, just searching and hoping and trusting to whatever extent we see fit, which does vary of course.

Contradictions are frustrating for me because we're never going to see the bottom of this through muddy waters and muddy waters are never going to be purified by people who contradict themselves, or by people's reasons for past actions/non actions shifting due to a current climate. This is very disappointing, I had found some of Simon's information helpful, now it's not reliable, for me.

I hope I've expressed myself clearly enough, I don't feel I have, I'm trying to offer an example of why it's important that people in the spotlight become more responsible with the truth, to have more respect for the truth.

Please consider the effects of these muddy waters, we don't have time to keep purifying them.

I mean no harm. I hope the people who have been hurt by such situations can move on as being stronger and wiser for it, including Simon. Much love.

[RunningDeer]

Too soft. I'm deaf. Going to be very lazy and wait for RunningDeer's :heart: bullet point summary...
:cantina:

Here's the transcript, Sierra. There are some awkward bits, but for the most part I've typed what Simon said for about 10 minutes beginning @ 4:18 (https://youtu.be/SOg0mp0AkVI?t=4m18s).


2016-07-17 Simon Parkes Q&AII
SOg0mp0AkVI



Simon: It’s been a very interesting few weeks. The entity that I’ve always called “dad”, I finally removed him from my life.

He then references a video that is an hour and half long coming out. (the one in the OP)

Simon continues: I’ve answered them as honestly and openly and sincerely as I could. But briefly here, about just over a year ago a member of my family that lives 200 miles away sent me a message saying, “There’s a shadow that’s come into the room and I thought it was you. It felt like you. Had the same energy signature as you. But when I looked, it was just a shadow and it’s not you.”

So, what I realized was the thing was masquerading as me or pretending to be me. But that’s all the information I had. Now, there were a couple of other people that said similar things but they had different agendas as well. So these were people that I’d not invite back to the house for a cup of tea. All I had really was this member of the family that said something.

And then at the conference in Manchester, a dear old friend, and quite a cohort of light workers who had been working on a separate topic to do with the dracos, um that night, she said that she felt that..she knew it wasn’t me..something like me had tried to get into the bedroom where she was in the hotel.

When she told me that, that was the final piece of the jigsaw puzzle and I was able to put two and two together. And what I worked out was that when I was between the ages of three years old and six years old, the entity that I refer to as “dad”, that’s the white draconus (sp?) Anu, put some sort of energy hook, that’s the best way I can describe it, the auric field of my body. And he was using that not solely go to visit women but also men as well to either try to sexually excite them or frighten them or what ever agenda he had.

And when I realized that he had betrayed me, the audience has to realize is that this being had never hurt me. I had no reason to never mistrust him. But when I realized and I think it had to be Fran to tell me because I worked very closely with Fran for over a year. And we set up 'Connecting Conscious' together. I trusted her and I knew that she wouldn’t spin any yarn and this is very true.

And as soon as I scanned myself, knowing what I was looking for, sure enough I found what I can only describe was an energy hook. And I didn’t even think about lying, cuz I could have said to Fran, “Oh, no. That’s not true. That’s not the case.” Or I could have said, “Do you know what? I’m far too spiritual for anything like that to happen,” and denied it.

But that’s not what I’m about and as soon as I discovered it, I felt totally betrayed. Because some wher between the ages of three, as a small boy and six, this entity had done that to me without my permission. That’s why actually it was easy to get rid of, because there was no contract with it. It had been done without my knowledge.

And so I removed that with the help of others. And I banished him from my life, removed any contact, any um..there were no grievance as such, but any chance of it coming back. And I took his picture off the website, and replaced it with the human side which is the Agatha network, Mt. Shasta. And got Fran to put a little statement out as well that basically apologized to people. And saying that you need to understand that this is a manipulation that’s taking place.

And some people said to me, “Why didn’t you spot it earlier?” The fact of the matter is that I did regularly scan myself for anything. But because I know no different, this is done between the ages of three or six, every time I looked this thing which I would just describe as this sort of hook thing, I thought it was part of my body, and it wasn’t alien. But when I also did this full scan, I found three energy implants around my head: one to the left of my ear, one above the crown chakra as it were, and one to the right. These were energy and I dissolve those.

And the amazing thing is that people, that’s quite a good idea, people said to me, “You look younger.” (Simon chuckled) So it’s taken a weight off me because probably my higher self always knew that something was wrong, something was being manipulated, something wasn’t right. And um, that’s a great relief.

So my first inkling was, right..let’s get this out to every body and explain what’s happened.

Now, those people who are spiritual will say, “Well, Simon’s gone on his own journey. And he’s seen this deception and he’s acted in a way that we always hope he would have.”

But there will be some people of course who will say, “No, I told you he was with bad.” And you know they can go on their own journey and do what they want. I’m sure I’ll loose some people. But I will gain far more. Gain people who will really understand what’s going on. And hopefully will see that I’m sure I’m not the first and sadly I suppose, will not [be] the last. But it is the game they play. And this entity will never play that game with me again.

So that’s been a really, really exciting development in terms of my own evolution, my own way of developing. That’s my news on that one.

:heart:

[Biff]

when I was between the ages of three years old and six years old, the entity that I refer to as “dad”, that’s the white draconus Annu, put some sort of energy hook, that’s the best way I can describe it, the auric field of my body. And he was using that not solely go to visit women but also men as well to either try to sexually excite them or frighten them or what ever agenda he had.

That seems like odd behaviour for such an ancient being as the mythical Anu. I'd say if Simon's dad was a real being, it was never Anu (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anu)but an imposter. But, I don't believe a word that comes from Simon's mouth, personally.

[Innocent Warrior]

I think that Simon may have meant that he regrets he didn't have more time to spend on Avalon before--from his perspective--the energies changed here.
It seems to me that recently if we don't use EXACTLY the right words to express themselves, we are invariably misunderstood, and most often with very negative results.
The instinct to attack and find fault has been growing, at a time when I think we need above all to be more understanding and forgiving.
I think if you listen to the rest of the OP, Innocent Warrior, you will be pleasantly surprised at Simon's sincerity.
This doesn't mean that he hasn't made mistakes, just as we all do, but he's admitting to them, trying to make peace and to go on from there, though not taking the blame for things he doesn't feel responsible for.
Which is certainly a lot wiser than remaining stuck in anger, judgement, self-flagellation, etc.
There's enough of all that kind of negativity already to go around.
We all have a lot of healing to do.
Best to get on with it.

This is what Simon said -


S - This individual is working with several others on Avalon and I absolutely stand by what I say. There are people who have archontic energy, there are people that have a very different soul to a soul that's created by divine consciousness. It doesn’t mean those people are bad. You know I did a talk recently and I said, “you take a guys who’s done 25 years in the state penitentiary for murder and comes out, he might be one of the best people on the planet. You take someone comes out the Vatican, the establishment tell us he’ll be the best person on the planet, but he might not be". So we don’t judge or shouldn’t judge on the make-up of a person, but what we should judge is whether they are being genuine with us, and in this particular individual’s case, this person was working with a group of other people who really decided that they didn’t like me and they were going to have a go at me.

I used to be on Avalon about three years ago, four years ago, and I had a regular slot and then I noticed that the number of attacks were building and growing and the moderators weren’t doing what they were supposed to be doing. So I realised that there was something very untoward and what’s quite interesting is that Bill Ryan who runs Avalon, and I’ve always had the highest regard for Bill…

Interviewer - Yeah he’s a good guy, I like...

S - and I won’t say anything bad about him. You know Bill had a private one-on-one on Skype. We talked about a lot of issues he was facing and, very oddly, two days later Christine, who was associated with Bill up until that point, also then decided that she wanted to have a talk to me and tell me what was going on on Avalon. Now I didn’t solicit those. Now you know those two individuals are key members of Avalon and both of them Skyped me to have a private and confidential conversation and they’re private and confidential, and I won’t say, but what I will say is not everything was rosey and happy in the Avalon family and I’m not part of Avalon now because it’s vicious energy. It was the most wonderful site but isn’t so good now, there are lots of good people who are just keeping their head down and not posting, they just read the posts and it’s lost a lot of people and all I would say is this happens.

This is not about Simon neglecting to use exact words, I, of course, paid attention to the context in which Simon was saying this. Onawah, what was it that he said that caused you to think, "Simon may have meant that he regrets he didn't have more time to spend on Avalon before--from his perspective--the energies changed here.". Before when? Before he realised there was something very untoward or before the energy turned vicious? Some unspoken time in between? He neglected to mention the reason he gave in his post and chose to give those reasons.

Given what he said, what has transpired, and the fact that a report of Avalon such as his encourages people not to listen to posters at Avalon, which is where the complaints came from, who's interpretation is biased here?

Although I don't think what I wrote was inaccurate, I will change what I wrote to, "gave other reasons", so as to make sure it is not taken as a misquote. I will concede and admit there is a little room for interpretation, although for me to adopt yours would be too much of a stretch for me.

[Andre]

... I am frustrated and disappointed by what I heard in the interview in the OP and stopped listening about half way through. Simon has contradicted himself again ... Simon's opinion itself is not the issue here, the issue is that he has contradicted himself again.

I'm sure that if I took several interviews of any Light-worker, I would find what appears to be contradictions in their words. And it would be easy for me if I am focused on finding those contradictions.

Personally, I don't see the point in looking for contradictions that in the end are really not that significant. I would rather focus on the message.

[Buzzie]

The first three minute intro to this video is a bit much. Otherwise great interview with a lot of new information.

[giovonni]

For those in the Alternative media who knock forums (such as Avalon) ... If it wasn't for such free outlets -
You wouldn't be collecting any revenues from your personal websites & youtube podcasts ...

Just saying ... wink/wink

[Innocent Warrior]

Simon wrote -


It's such a shame that I've not even had the time to visit Avalon as I would like. My commitment to Bill who is without question an outstandingly good person, will always remain strong and my lack of presence here should not be interpreted in any way as a negative stance.

Simon said -


S - This individual is working with several others on Avalon and I absolutely stand by what I say. There are people who have archontic energy, there are people that have a very different soul to a soul that's created by divine consciousness. It doesn’t mean those people are bad. You know I did a talk recently and I said, “you take a guys who’s done 25 years in the state penitentiary for murder and comes out, he might be one of the best people on the planet. You take someone comes out the Vatican, the establishment tell us he’ll be the best person on the planet, but he might not be. So we don’t judge or shouldn’t judge on the make-up of a person, but what we should judge is whether they are being genuine with us, and in this particular individual’s case, this person was working with a group of other people who really decided that they didn’t like me and they were going to have a go at me.

I used to be on Avalon about three years ago, four years ago, and I had a regular slot and then I noticed that the number of attacks were building and growing and the moderators weren’t doing what they were supposed to be doing. So I realised that there was something very untoward and what’s quite interesting is that Bill Ryan who runs Avalon, and I’ve always had the highest regard for Bill…

Interviewer - Yeah he’s a good guy, I like...

S - and I won’t say anything bad about him. You know Bill had a private one-on-one on Skype. We talked about a lot of issues he was facing and, very oddly, two days later Christine, who was associated with Bill up until that point, also then decided that she wanted to have a talk to me and tell me what was going on on Avalon. Now I didn’t solicit those. Now you know those two individuals are key members of Avalon and both of them Skyped me to have a private and confidential conversation and they’re private and confidential, and I won’t say, but what I will say is not everything was rosey and happy in the Avalon family and I’m not part of Avalon now because it’s vicious energy. It was the most wonderful site but isn’t so good now, there are lots of good people who are just keeping their head down and not posting, they just read the posts and it’s lost a lot of people and all I would say is this happens.


I'm sure that if I took several interviews of any Light-worker, I would find what appears to be contradictions in their words. And it would be easy for me if I am focused on finding those contradictions.

Personally, I don't see the point in looking for contradictions that in the end are really not that significant. I would rather focus on the message.

Right. Not significant at all, it’s barely noticeable, and clearly no other factors were considered before I wrote my initial post. And silly me for seeing significance in the relationship between the level of integrity demonstrated throughout this saga by the messenger and the integrity of the message.

OK, I’m already resorting to sarcasm, time for me to move on. Enjoy the message.

[onawah]

Very good point from Gio and I totally agree.
Though Simon reportedly isn't making all that much money and apparently has had to borrow a friend's laptop until he is able to buy another, and he does give a lot of free sessions, as well as help people financially who need it when he can.
But I would say without a doubt that Avalon helped him to become more known internationally, and it would be nice if he would acknowledge that.
What is also significant for me, however, is that Simon has become aware that he was being used by a dark entity and he is taking steps now to repair the damage done.
We've seen a lot of whistleblowers whose work was initially helpful but who have apparently eventually been taken over by opposing forces until it becomes difficult to say whose side they are really on.
So for me, though I don't think Simon is at all done with the work he has to do on himself, or done with making amends to those who were harmed, he is at least on the right track, and I think that's encouraging.
For anyone who has experienced an invasion of the kind that Simon was dealing with since he was a small child, you will understand that this is huge.
Though it will no doubt be a struggle to understand for those who are fortunate enough to have had no such experiences.
But I can see the difference in his appearance and his demeanor seems much more natural, so I think something has definitely changed.
What is also very noteworthy, and which seems to have gone unnoticed on this forum for the most part, is the fact that Simon has been dealing with attacks on all of his communication devices for a long time and that he has been so targeted as to have a cell tower mast blasting unprecedented amounts of microwaves from only 90 feet away from his house, as verified by his friend Win Keech, who is a scientist and a credible witness.
So that should tell us something about how much the elite would like to shut him up and stop him altogether.
What I would like to point out to Simon is that he was operating under that Reptilian influence the whole time he was an active member on Avalon (and before), and that I'm sure many of us here sensitive enough to intuit that something was not right were very hesitant to trust him, and so continued to question his credibility.
I certainly count myself among that number, but at the same time, I appreciate that he has taken on the responsibilities of a whistleblower and obviously he has had some effect or he wouldn't be attacked the way he has been by those who want to silence him.
For that reason, I think he deserves some credit and support, while at the same time, needs to take a much deeper look at how he has been used and how much work there is still to be done.
That kind of damage doesn't just go away overnight, no matter what kind of positively oriented allies he may have, not just to himself, but to those who have been targeted.
And though the invasion may have happened when he was three and so gone unnoticed until recently, I think there must have been signs that others were noting that something was off, and I hope he will be much more attentive now to feedback.
His human side has an opportunity now to begin manifesting more strongly, and I hope that he will allow that to happen.
Though it will mean that he will become more sensitive himself, and that will no doubt involve more pain as well as more joy.


For those in the Alternative media who knock forums (such as Avalon) ... If it wasn't for such free outlets -
You wouldn't be collecting any revenues from your personal websites & youtube podcasts ...

Just saying ... wink/wink

[Sierra]

Are you sure you covered all the bases Onawah?

I think I'm skipping a lot of what you say because I've learned the constant justification on your part interferes with my coming to my own interpretation of the situation. Also you say you know this, you know that, here is another extenuating circumstance, and I also find that distracting from the real issue, using people for sex.

I found most of what you said to be future oriented, how you would like Simon to behave in the future. Expectations, hmmmm... You have a LOT of expectations of how you want Simon to behave.

Now we're supposed to believe it wasn't Simon screwing these people, it was his daddy.

Oh.

I'm not sure this relates to anything else I've read about experiencers, that one must screw to "help" people. Usually the experiencers are the violated ones.

As well, the vast majority of people using people for sex, do so because they want to have sex. I'm having a hard time removing Simon from this category.

Bottom line: I think if Simon had been honest(er) he would have asked ya wanna screw, rather than you need to screw me so I can get rid of entities, and of which behavior I truly think is more likely to give you entities, not remove them.

If what I say is considered vicious, well, sometimes hearing the truth is truly painful, especially when one did not expect to get busted by people comparing notes.

[marique3652]

... I am frustrated and disappointed by what I heard in the interview in the OP and stopped listening about half way through. Simon has contradicted himself again ... Simon's opinion itself is not the issue here, the issue is that he has contradicted himself again.

I'm sure that if I took several interviews of any Light-worker, I would find what appears to be contradictions in their words. And it would be easy for me if I am focused on finding those contradictions.

Personally, I don't see the point in looking for contradictions that in the end are really not that significant. I would rather focus on the message.

I tend to pay attention to contradictions, even if small ones. I raised 11 sons and it was most important to notice "contradictions" in what they told me, because it was those contradictions (usually because my son could not keep his "story" straight) that alerted me to look into things further. Even if it was only a small inconsistency, it was something that always alerted me that something was more than it seemed...With 11 boys to raise, I had to be ever vigilant to what was being said to me in order to keep track of so many, and as growing boys will do, sometimes they told me untruths. Sometimes those tiny inconsistencies made a difference in my keeping my sons safe from dangerous situations or people, and kept them from getting into trouble, or at least it hinted to me that there may be trouble I did not know about. My sons ratted each other out a lot, such is a trait of sibling rivalry. It was my job to figure out, by seeing contradictions, what my sons were REALLY up to and the motives for them telling me the things they did. I also had to really hone my senses to who was lying, what the lies, and what was the motive. So that habit of noticing when someone says one thing, and then says something completely different sets my inner alarm system off every time, and makes me wonder why the difference. I am not able to separate and accept a message as truth, when things are contradictive, nor am I able to believe something simply because I want to believe it and it fits in with my philosophy. I have not commented on Simon previously, as I would feel like I am talking about someone behind their back (even though in front of their face to read, lol), and I am shy about sharing here.

So I will instead address my concerns about anyone ignoring inconsistencies, even if tiny. Usually there is a backstory about why something is different...For me, saying that they don't like the energies on this site, is inconsistent with wishing that they had more time to be on this site...a big difference. When I see something like that, that does it for me, and I don't think it is an overlookable inconsistency. Many times people have come here with some very fascinating stories and I always process what is being said impartially, but sometimes if you listen to someone for a long time, eventually you can sense if something just seems off, so noticing inconsistencies is not a bad thing in my estimation. I also feel like the larger and more complex a story is, the more there is to keep track of for the teller of the story, but it is not difficult to keep track of the truth, because the truth is the truth no matter what. Differences and inconsistencies are more apt to happen where there is a stretch of the truth or a telling of a whopper in my experience. On that I will end my comment. Sorry for the ramble. I truly enjoy reading all of the wonderful discussions here and figured I would get brave and say how I feel.

[Flash]

Wow, you should post a bit more -- 11 boys, lots of work! Me who thought I had a lot with my only daughter because of disabilities!!!

Yes, I agree with looking at inconsistencies, this is a must.

However, I may add that sometimes people are inconsistent and they do not even realize it - they are soooo mixed up inside that they do not realise they are inconsistent, or manipulating, or hurting others.

I have met many hard core manipulators who thought they were totally alright and justified. They believed themselves, their own lies or manipulations.

As long as it is not full fledge psychopathy/sociopathy, as long as there is some heart somewhere in their life (ex: drug addicts ), there is an evolution potential and I will keep away, but I may have a tendency to help if they show a tiny bit of will to be helped.

In this case I would prudently give a hand which may sometimes even be a kick in the buttock (psychologically).

I am talking general here, not specifics, not targetting anyone.

Now, when I now listen to anyone on conspiracy or fringe forums, my "manipulation potential" filters are on (was not always the case in the past) and I listen or read with a grain of salt. Times shows me the writer's evolution, thinking, truth or falshood, integrity, etc. In life too by the way.

Nonetheless, I see human nature as it is and I see that we all have our hang ups which may look bad in other's views, and in this, I extend an understanding and sometimes forgiving hand.






... I am frustrated and disappointed by what I heard in the interview in the OP and stopped listening about half way through. Simon has contradicted himself again ... Simon's opinion itself is not the issue here, the issue is that he has contradicted himself again.

I'm sure that if I took several interviews of any Light-worker, I would find what appears to be contradictions in their words. And it would be easy for me if I am focused on finding those contradictions.

Personally, I don't see the point in looking for contradictions that in the end are really not that significant. I would rather focus on the message.

I tend to pay attention to contradictions, even if small ones. I raised 11 sons and it was most important to notice "contradictions" in what they told me, because it was those contradictions (usually because my son could not keep his "story" straight) that alerted me to look into things further. Even if it was only a small inconsistency, it was something that always alerted me that something was more than it seemed...With 11 boys to raise, I had to be ever vigilant to what was being said to me in order to keep track of so many, and as growing boys will do, sometimes they told me untruths. Sometimes those tiny inconsistencies made a difference in my keeping my sons safe from dangerous situations or people, and kept them from getting into trouble, or at least it hinted to me that there may be trouble I did not know about. My sons ratted each other out a lot, such is a trait of sibling rivalry. It was my job to figure out, by seeing contradictions, what my sons were REALLY up to and the motives for them telling me the things they did. I also had to really hone my senses to who was lying, what the lies, and what was the motive. So that habit of noticing when someone says one thing, and then says something completely different sets my inner alarm system off every time, and makes me wonder why the difference. I am not able to separate and accept a message as truth, when things are contradictive, nor am I able to believe something simply because I want to believe it and it fits in with my philosophy. I have not commented on Simon previously, as I would feel like I am talking about someone behind their back (even though in front of their face to read, lol), and I am shy about sharing here.

So I will instead address my concerns about anyone ignoring inconsistencies, even if tiny. Usually there is a backstory about why something is different...For me, saying that they don't like the energies on this site, is inconsistent with wishing that they had more time to be on this site...a big difference. When I see something like that, that does it for me, and I don't think it is an overlookable inconsistency. Many times people have come here with some very fascinating stories and I always process what is being said impartially, but sometimes if you listen to someone for a long time, eventually you can sense if something just seems off, so noticing inconsistencies is not a bad thing in my estimation. I also feel like the larger and more complex a story is, the more there is to keep track of for the teller of the story, but it is not difficult to keep track of the truth, because the truth is the truth no matter what. Differences and inconsistencies are more apt to happen where there is a stretch of the truth or a telling of a whopper in my experience. On that I will end my comment. Sorry for the ramble. I truly enjoy reading all of the wonderful discussions here and figured I would get brave and say how I feel.

[giovonni]

For those in the Alternative media who knock forums (such as Avalon) ... If it wasn't for such free outlets -
You wouldn't be collecting any revenues from your personal websites & youtube podcasts ...

Just saying ... wink/wink

This statement stands as a general acknowledgement of this forums importance to the entire community's lifeline ... The proof being in the ever continuing visits of guests who come here everyday in search of its latest.

[Flash]

Well, if you put Anu as the ultimate negative being, like none on earth is able to imagine, well, in this case, it would not be odd at all.



when I was between the ages of three years old and six years old, the entity that I refer to as “dad”, that’s the white draconus Annu, put some sort of energy hook, that’s the best way I can describe it, the auric field of my body. And he was using that not solely go to visit women but also men as well to either try to sexually excite them or frighten them or what ever agenda he had.

That seems like odd behaviour for such an ancient being as the mythical Anu. I'd say if Simon's dad was a real being, it was never Anu (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anu)but an imposter. But, I don't believe a word that comes from Simon's mouth, personally.

[marique3652]

Wow, you should post a bit more -- 11 boys, lots of work! Me who thought I had a lot with my only daughter because of disabilities!!!

Yes, I agree with looking at inconsistencies, this is a must.

However, I may add that sometimes people are inconsistent and they do not even realize it - they are soooo mixed up inside that they do not realise they are inconsistent, or manipulating, or hurting others.

I have met many hard core manipulators who thought they were totally alright and justified. They believed themselves, their own lies or manipulations.

As long as it is not full fledge psychopathy/sociopathy, as long as there is some heart somewhere in their life (ex: drug addicts ), there is an evolution potential and I will keep away, but I may have a tendency to help if they show a tiny bit of will to be helped.

In this case I would prudently give a hand which may sometimes even be a kick in the buttock (psychologically).

I am talking general here, not specifics, not targetting anyone.

Now, when I now listen to anyone on conspiracy or fringe forums, my "manipulation potential" filters are on (was not always the case in the past) and I listen or read with a grain of salt. Times shows me the writer's evolution, thinking, truth or falshood, integrity, etc. In life too by the way.

Nonetheless, I see human nature as it is and I see that we all have our hang ups which may look bad in other's views, and in this, I extend an understanding and sometimes forgiving hand."

I would like to add to my previous comment that when I judge a story, I am judging the story and running it through my analytical mind and decide whether I believe it or not (and also rely on "Mommy Senses") when forming my opinion. I feel free to judge a story, but am hesitant on the other hand to judge the person telling the story, because as you pointed out, sometimes the person is in turmoil, or maybe even believes the story wholeheartedly, and are not sometimes trying to hurt anyone (however sometimes they are trying to deceive for whatever reason). I try not to pass judgment on the story teller as a person. If I had held it against any of my kids when they told me tales, then it would have been bad for the family and for me as a mother. I have to say that my "tribe" were very creative with reality when it seemed to serve their agenda, lol....I heard some real whoppers in my stretch at being mother. I was more interested in learning why they lied, it gave me valuable insights believe me.

I have listened to some people who have shared here who have at first seemed to be genuine to me, but later it became apparent that they were less than up front. I have always tried to give anyone the benefit of the doubt. I have found some of these "story tellers" quite charming and charismatic, and I do not necessarily dislike the person, just judge whether what they share rings true for me personally. I keep my feelings about them to myself for the most part, that is why I do not comment often, lol. Have been a fly on the wall here for a few years. There have been times however, when I felt like commenting "come on people, do you actually believe this?", but kept my mouth shut, and believe me sometimes it has been tough to do so, lol. Being an experiencer of "strange things" in my own life, I do not pass judgment on other experiencers of truly bizarre or incredible things. I have shared my own experiences and have run into people who wished to tear me to shreds because they did not believe what happened to me, so I try to treat people the same way I would like to be treated. However, that does not stop me from sometimes disbelieving incredible claims. NA communities are full of extraordinary stories, claims, and agendas, so I just try to wade through it all and form my own opinion on the truths I see, as well as the untruths. I do try not to judge others though, we each have our areas of struggle. It is very possible to love and care about someone even if you think they are complete liars, this much I have learned. Some of the people who have turned out to be full of tripe I would still love to sit down and talk to anyway, and get to know them. Just wanted to say that.

[giovonni]

I am talking general here, not specifics, not targetting anyone.

Now, when I now listen to anyone on conspiracy or fringe forums, my "manipulation potential" filters are on (was not always the case in the past) and I listen or read with a grain of salt. Times shows me the writer's evolution, thinking, truth or falshood, integrity, etc. In life too by the way.

Nonetheless, I see human nature as it is and I see that we all have our hang ups which may look bad in other's views, and in this, I extend an understanding and sometimes forgiving hand.



:bump: ... Well said !

[Sean]

.
Did he mention this? (A genuine question: I won't have to listen to the video. Bulletpoint summary appreciated.)

http://projectavalon.net/Simon_Parkes_public_apology_6_June_2016_sm.jpg

So, Simon's excuse is basically, "The devil made me do it"?!

PLEASE tell me no one is gullible enough to buy that..

[onawah]

I'm not sure I quite followed your reasoning here, Sierra, but I think I understand what you are saying, basically.
If you had not skipped a lot of what I've said, you might have noticed that I wasn't justifying Simon's behavior, but explaining it from the point of view of someone (me) who also experienced as a child an other-dimensional being who was trying to control me against my will.
It wasn't because I was a bad person, it was because I was a source of light, but it caused problems that I'm sure I wasn't aware of, and couldn't have done anything about, in any case, until I had help in getting rid of it.
Until you have walked in someone's shoes who has had that kind of experience, I don't think you can really understand what's that's like, or what it's like to be unable to find someone who knows how to help with that kind of problem.
Did you listen to Alexandra's interview with Simon where they talked about what it's like for a deprogrammer to try to help someone with that kind of problem?
Did you hear them say that very few people are able or willing to do that kind of work, and that regular therapists don't have a clue when it comes to dealing with discarnate entities?
That's all a part of the discussion too, as far as I'm concerned.
And I have also pointed out repeatedly that I don't think it was a good idea for Simon to get into those one on one sessions, whether you call them counseling or deprogramming or whatever, until he had done more work on himself, but I don't think he was aware of that necessity until recently.
He could have denied or tried to cover it up or just ignored the reports of abuse, but he is trying to deal with it, and I think he deserves some credit for that.
And maybe we should give him a chance to deal with all that himself before we make judgments.
He's barely had time to process all the ramifications himself.
My main point about Simon's future was that he still needs to do a lot of work to be healed and clear of that experience, though I think he's on the right track.
And one more time: no one seems to recognize that Simon wouldn't be targeted with the kind of attacks that he has been targeted with if the elite didn't think he was causing problems with their agenda.
Here is some more of his whistleblower work, where he is adding more pieces to the puzzle that a lot of people were probably not aware of.
WVcxFaa99wI
I don't think I would be brave enough to do that, and so I am grateful for whistleblowers.
I wouldn't know half of what I know if they weren't out there risking their lives, and I don't think many others would, either.
Do you know of a perfect whistleblower, a perfect deprogrammer?
If you find one, please let me know!


Are you sure you covered all the bases Onawah?

I think I'm skipping a lot of what you say because I've learned the constant justification on your part interferes with my coming to my own interpretation of the situation. Also you say you know this, you know that, here is another extenuating circumstance, and I also find that distracting from the real issue, using people for sex.

I found most of what you said to be future oriented, how you would like Simon to behave in the future. Expectations, hmmmm... You have a LOT of expectations of how you want Simon to behave.

Now we're supposed to believe it wasn't Simon screwing these people, it was his daddy.

Oh.

I'm not sure this relates to anything else I've read about experiencers, that one must screw to "help" people. Usually the experiencers are the violated ones.

As well, the vast majority of people using people for sex, do so because they want to have sex. I'm having a hard time removing Simon from this category.

Bottom line: I think if Simon had been honest(er) he would have asked ya wanna screw, rather than you need to screw me so I can get rid of entities, and of which behavior I truly think is more likely to give you entities, not remove them.

If what I say is considered vicious, well, sometimes hearing the truth is truly painful, especially when one did not expect to get busted by people comparing notes.

[Chester]

I've come to see clearly the arrogance and ignorance of anyone (including myself) judging any other human being. A human personality alone is complex, without taking in to account other dynamic factors. It seems those who are fit to judge with any accuracy never do, and those who do are not even close to being fit to. So, please know that I do not judge Simon or anyone else, despite what may arise in my mind, which I have come to accept as natural while being a human in the condition of these times, but have promised myself not to honour anymore. There's too much judgement around and too much fear of being judged, and it holds us back from being as honest as we could be. I hope this changes.

I am frustrated and disappointed by what I heard in the interview in the OP and stopped listening about half way through. Simon has contradicted himself again.

Simon wrote (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88999-Our-experience-with-Simon-Parkes-as-a-counselor&p=1048562&viewfull=1#post1048562) -


It's such a shame that I've not even had the time to visit Avalon as I would like.

Now he says he is not a part of Avalon for other reasons. Well everyone is entitled to their opinion, each individual will have their own experience and make whatever they do of it, Simon's opinion itself is not the issue here, the issue is that he has contradicted himself again.

Why do I care? Because experiencers like me who don't have an advanced psychic sight as people like Simon claim to have, are encouraged when we come across someone who appears to have much more access to the truth of what's going on. Perhaps we'll find a gem that answers a question we have, perhaps an insight may inch us a little closer to the truth of what the hell is going on here. We're not stupid, not gullible, just searching and hoping and trusting to whatever extent we see fit, which does vary of course.

Contradictions are frustrating for me because we're never going to see the bottom of this through muddy waters and muddy waters are never going to be purified by people who contradict themselves, or by people's reasons for past actions/non actions shifting due to a current climate. This is very disappointing, I had found some of Simon's information helpful, now it's not reliable, for me.

I hope I've expressed myself clearly enough, I don't feel I have, I'm trying to offer an example of why it's important that people in the spotlight become more responsible with the truth, to have more respect for the truth.

Please consider the effects of these muddy waters, we don't have time to keep purifying them.

I mean no harm. I hope the people who have been hurt by such situations can move on as being stronger and wiser for it, including Simon. Much love.

This is truly (for me) one of the very best posts I ever read. Thanks, Innocent Warrior.

[Flash]

I think I truly like old big family mommies!!!:highfive: re: Marique 3652

[onawah]

This may resonate with you, and it may not.
If not, blessings, and please continue doing what you feel you have to do.
If it does resonate, it may be very helpful but if nothing else, at least pleasant to listen to, as Jay Pee is a very nice guy.
Jay Pee, who has been interviewing Simon on Wolf Spirit Radio, and it's related to that.
Z_xegaOnWgE

[Chester]

Are you sure you covered all the bases Onawah?

I think I'm skipping a lot of what you say because I've learned the constant justification on your part interferes with my coming to my own interpretation of the situation. Also you say you know this, you know that, here is another extenuating circumstance, and I also find that distracting from the real issue, using people for sex.

I found most of what you said to be future oriented, how you would like Simon to behave in the future. Expectations, hmmmm... You have a LOT of expectations of how you want Simon to behave.

Now we're supposed to believe it wasn't Simon screwing these people, it was his daddy.

Oh.

I'm not sure this relates to anything else I've read about experiencers, that one must screw to "help" people. Usually the experiencers are the violated ones.

As well, the vast majority of people using people for sex, do so because they want to have sex. I'm having a hard time removing Simon from this category.

Bottom line: I think if Simon had been honest(er) he would have asked ya wanna screw, rather than you need to screw me so I can get rid of entities, and of which behavior I truly think is more likely to give you entities, not remove them.

If what I say is considered vicious, well, sometimes hearing the truth is truly painful, especially when one did not expect to get busted by people comparing notes.

Thank You, Sierra... I have been waiting for this post for almost 19 months.

Finally...

[greybeard]

Im a little surprised that what Simon says is still taking up so much space on Avalon--after all he has distanced himself from this place---the energies have changed--does that mean the energy has risen and he no longer feels comfortable here?
Can we not let him go? He does not want to interact with Avalon.
There are other places where what Simon says can be debated.

Some will never see through him regardless of evidence presented by members here.

Bill has been very clear on this subject.

Chris

[Flash]

When there is disbalance in someone, I mean spiritual or otherwise, and that the heart is not sufficiently opened, disbalance coupled with some public recognition or some form of power, meaning ego trip, it will generally fall in the second chakra and people will have all sort of weird sexual needs and behaviors. Exploitation of others will take this form as well. And they will also have existence insecurities and therfore amass lots of material goods, up to a point of being really sick and obsessive about it. All in a disbalance being, living on a crooked second chakra.

As long as we are not pretty much fully developed spiritually, we may fall for this. Hence the huge amount of sexual misconduct or sexually weird or plainly disgusting behavior amongst the cabal/"false elite" (because they are nothing as an elite, spiritually talking) members (including pedophilia). For them the heart chakra and spiritual development is pretty much at a total stop, if existing at all.

Therefore, up to now, there is very very few people that would not fall for sex, and/or any of its deviations, if they were given power over others allowing their ego to inflate subtantially.

I will not throw the stone without looking at my own ego. But I will take the lesson to develop myself and become a better person.

Simon and others should to.

And Chris, you are right, we should just let it go.

I previously wrote someting directly to Simon, on this thread since I no more have any mean of communication with him, and twice my computer stopped. So I presumed I should not write it, it would not be useful.

But in a few sentences, it was saying that I am sending back the elevator for the help Simon has freely given me, with no service in sex lol :

One must own everything he/she is. Everything. The light, the dark, the sh it, everything. No excuses, NO VICTIMS HERE.

See what you did, positive AND negative, acknowledge it, accept it, and learn about yourself from all sides. Finally love yourself with and despite what you are and what you did. Shadow is negative as long as it remains shadow and it is not acknowledge, and filled with light.

We are all positive and negative. It is truth and love for oneself and others that makes the change.

And the will of helping others is the very first ever step towards inner evolution. The intent is the first direction towards light. But it may takes many lifes before the heart opens first and greater evolution follows (has nothing to do with genetics and making hybrids by the way - greys and dracs are unable to understand this truly - and let me laugh at soul catching, they do not understand it).

Ok, I am done with this thread, Chris is right Onawah.

--------------









Are you sure you covered all the bases Onawah?

I think I'm skipping a lot of what you say because I've learned the constant justification on your part interferes with my coming to my own interpretation of the situation. Also you say you know this, you know that, here is another extenuating circumstance, and I also find that distracting from the real issue, using people for sex.

I found most of what you said to be future oriented, how you would like Simon to behave in the future. Expectations, hmmmm... You have a LOT of expectations of how you want Simon to behave.

Now we're supposed to believe it wasn't Simon screwing these people, it was his daddy.

Oh.

I'm not sure this relates to anything else I've read about experiencers, that one must screw to "help" people. Usually the experiencers are the violated ones.

As well, the vast majority of people using people for sex, do so because they want to have sex. I'm having a hard time removing Simon from this category.

Bottom line: I think if Simon had been honest(er) he would have asked ya wanna screw, rather than you need to screw me so I can get rid of entities, and of which behavior I truly think is more likely to give you entities, not remove them.

If what I say is considered vicious, well, sometimes hearing the truth is truly painful, especially when one did not expect to get busted by people comparing notes.

Thank You, Sierra... I have been waiting for this post for almost 19 months.

Finally...

[Tangri]

White (light) children can get grey and later dark if they play long enough with mug.



2g5Hz17C4is

[Andre]

Here we go. The old "let's shoot the messenger" game.

This small minded game plays right into the hands of trolls when we divert our attention from the message and attack the messenger. If you are not focused on the message and are giving all your energy to attacking the messenger, you need to ask yourself if you are being manipulated here.

Yes, we have to ask our Higher Self if the messenger is genuine and if so, then we need to listen to the message. If we're playing mind games, we'll be trapped in the matrix.

Why can't we focus on the key messages put forward in these interviews instead of attacking Simon?

There are messages in Simon's interviews that really need our attention, such as the potential plans to use HAARP on the San Andreas Fault before or after the U.S. Presidential elections. What's more important, the cabal's plans to create more havoc or a discussion of whether or not Simon behaviored correctly?

It's time we all upped our game and stop small minded attacks on each other. We're here to work together to create a better world.

Simon, Bill you and me - none of us are perfect. We all screw-up at times. We can indulge in who screwed up when and how or we can dust ourselves off, stand up and get back in the game of creating the world we want.

Your choice (and mine).

[Sean]

Here we go. The old "let's shoot the messenger" game.

This small minded game plays right into the hands of trolls when we divert our attention from the message and attack the messenger. If you are not focused on the message and are giving all your energy to attacking the messenger, you need to ask yourself if you are being manipulated here.

Yes, we have to ask our Higher Self if the messenger is genuine and if so, then we need to listen to the message. If we're playing mind games, we'll be trapped in the matrix.

Why can't we focus on the key messages put forward in these interviews instead of attacking Simon?

There are messages in Simon's interviews that really need our attention, such as the potential plans to use HAARP on the San Andreas Fault before or after the U.S. Presidential elections. What's more important, the cabal's plans to create more havoc or a discussion of whether or not Simon behaviored correctly?

It's time we all upped our game and stop small minded attacks on each other. We're here to work together to create a better world.

Simon, Bill you and me - none of us are perfect. We all screw-up at times. We can indulge in who screwed up when and how or we can dust ourselves off, stand up and get back in the game of creating the world we want.

Your choice (and mine).


The integrity of the messenger matters.

If he conducts himself this way..why would anyone listen to ANYTHING he says?

[HaveBlue]

Eurythmics song Sweet Dreams sums this saga up pretty good!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeMFqkcPYcg

[bojancan]

As somebody who had to experience in my life multiple misunderstandings, wrong accusations, negative judgments,... - like probably did most of you - I can fully understand and accept Simon's explanations, and see his sincerity.

Grateful for his enormous continuous contributions to our awakening! :bowing:

[DNA]

Are you sure you covered all the bases Onawah?

I think I'm skipping a lot of what you say because I've learned the constant justification on your part interferes with my coming to my own interpretation of the situation. Also you say you know this, you know that, here is another extenuating circumstance, and I also find that distracting from the real issue, using people for sex.

I found most of what you said to be future oriented, how you would like Simon to behave in the future. Expectations, hmmmm... You have a LOT of expectations of how you want Simon to behave.

Now we're supposed to believe it wasn't Simon screwing these people, it was his daddy.

Oh.

I'm not sure this relates to anything else I've read about experiencers, that one must screw to "help" people. Usually the experiencers are the violated ones.

As well, the vast majority of people using people for sex, do so because they want to have sex. I'm having a hard time removing Simon from this category.

Bottom line: I think if Simon had been honest(er) he would have asked ya wanna screw, rather than you need to screw me so I can get rid of entities, and of which behavior I truly think is more likely to give you entities, not remove them.

If what I say is considered vicious, well, sometimes hearing the truth is truly painful, especially when one did not expect to get busted by people comparing notes.


Sierra your post encapsulates everything I want to say so damn well, I feel like I'm at a religious revival and I'm yelling hallelujah sister and I'm dancing in the aisle and waiting for my turn so you can smack me on the head and heal me of all the damage that may have occurred due to my contemplation as to wither Simon had any validity and or positive intentions. I thank you sister Sierra :happy dog: :flower:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fDx628jn1YI
fDx628jn1YI

[Andre]

I tend to pay attention to contradictions, even if small ones. I raised 11 sons and it was most important to notice "contradictions" in what they told me, because it was those contradictions (usually because my son could not keep his "story" straight) that alerted me to look into things further.................................................................

As you would probably agree in your experience with your sons, let's wait and see if these minor contradictions lead to something? Personally, I doubt there is enough there to lead to anything. But until someone puts something a bit more substantial on the table than accusations that revolve around when Simon lost confidence in this forum, I would suggest that this thread is turning into a witch hunt by people who seem to be claiming some kind of moral high ground.

If someone doesn't believe what Simon has to offer, fine, but why do so many feel the need to go out of their way to put him down and judge him so readily? Remember that Christian saying "let he who is without sin caste the first stone"?

Simon is not perfect and I don't get that he tries to pretend to be. He has done amazing work and continues to do so.

[Andre]

When I was between the ages of three years old and six years old, the entity that I refer to as “dad”, that’s the white draconus Annu, put some sort of energy hook, that’s the best way I can describe it, the auric field of my body. And he was using that not solely go to visit women but also men as well to either try to sexually excite them or frighten them or what ever agenda he had.

That seems like odd behaviour for such an ancient being as the mythical Anu. I'd say if Simon's dad was a real being, it was never Anu but an imposter.

Good question Flash! In fact, apart from all the other near meaningless accusations in this thread, you have asked one of the most critically interesting questions of all. It certainly doesn't sound like the behavior of the great Anu. Why would he need to act that way? Doesn't make a lot of sense, I agree.

[Andre]

Are you sure you covered all the bases Onawah?

I think I'm skipping a lot of what you say because I've learned the constant justification on your part interferes with my coming to my own interpretation of the situation. Also you say you know this, you know that, here is another extenuating circumstance, and I also find that distracting from the real issue, using people for sex. I found most of what you said to be future oriented, how you would like Simon to behave in the future. Expectations, hmmmm... You have a LOT of expectations of how you want Simon to behave. Now we're supposed to believe it wasn't Simon screwing these people, it was his daddy. Oh. I'm not sure this relates to anything else I've read about experiencers, that one must screw to "help" people. Usually the experiencers are the violated ones. As well, the vast majority of people using people for sex, do so because they want to have sex. I'm having a hard time removing Simon from this category. Bottom line: I think if Simon had been honest(er) he would have asked ya wanna screw, rather than you need to screw me so I can get rid of entities, and of which behavior I truly think is more likely to give you entities, not remove them.
If what I say is considered vicious, well, sometimes hearing the truth is truly painful, especially when one did not expect to get busted by people comparing notes.

Sierra, next to your Avatar, it indicates you are an "Administrator". Does that mean you are a forum moderator or what? I ask because it would seem totally inappropriate for a moderator to posting in this way. I'm confused. Please clarify. Thanks.

[DNA]

I've come to see clearly the arrogance and ignorance of anyone (including myself) judging any other human being. A human personality alone is complex, without taking in to account other dynamic factors. It seems those who are fit to judge with any accuracy never do, and those who do are not even close to being fit to. So, please know that I do not judge Simon or anyone else, despite what may arise in my mind, which I have come to accept as natural while being a human in the condition of these times, but have promised myself not to honour anymore. There's too much judgement around and too much fear of being judged, and it holds us back from being as honest as we could be. I hope this changes.

I am frustrated and disappointed by what I heard in the interview in the OP and stopped listening about half way through. Simon has contradicted himself again.

Simon wrote (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88999-Our-experience-with-Simon-Parkes-as-a-counselor&p=1048562&viewfull=1#post1048562) -


It's such a shame that I've not even had the time to visit Avalon as I would like.Now he says he is not a part of Avalon for other reasons. Well everyone is entitled to their opinion, each individual will have their own experience and make whatever they do of it, Simon's opinion itself is not the issue here, the issue is that he has contradicted himself again.

Why do I care? Because experiencers like me who don't have an advanced psychic sight as people like Simon claim to have, are encouraged when we come across someone who appears to have much more access to the truth of what's going on. Perhaps we'll find a gem that answers a question we have, perhaps an insight may inch us a little closer to the truth of what the hell is going on here. We're not stupid, not gullible, just searching and hoping and trusting to whatever extent we see fit, which does vary of course.

Contradictions are frustrating for me because we're never going to see the bottom of this through muddy waters and muddy waters are never going to be purified by people who contradict themselves, or by people's reasons for past actions/non actions shifting due to a current climate. This is very disappointing, I had found some of Simon's information helpful, now it's not reliable, for me.

I hope I've expressed myself clearly enough, I don't feel I have, I'm trying to offer an example of why it's important that people in the spotlight become more responsible with the truth, to have more respect for the truth.

Please consider the effects of these muddy waters, we don't have time to keep purifying them.

I mean no harm. I hope the people who have been hurt by such situations can move on as being stronger and wiser for it, including Simon. Much love.


Wrong and right are fairly simple in terms of human interaction.
Are you taking the energy from the human energy fields of those you come in contact with or are you enhancing them.
This is what empathic people are capable of doing, we are feeling the interaction on our energy field. And with enough time, you are able to feel the intentions of others in so far as their designs concerning this matter.
This is all you have to do. You do not have to get into the story and try to figure out if Simon's story has any validity to it, just figure out his intentions.
I will always reserve the right to judge people. And I will do so harshly.
We need to exercise discernment more than ever before.
I appreciate your posts Innocent Warrior, but on this matter there really should be no standing on the fence.
This guy is a menace to the community you and I hold dear.
I understand folks in this community feel it is not kosher to call folks out, but when we find out folks are using a position as a spiritual advisor to further ingratiate and satisfy their own sexual needs. Come on, this is the old guru card and we can not stand for this.
And further more, it is spiritual parasitism. I don't think for a moment Simon Parks is lying about his child hood abductions, which make his couplings that much more creepier and damaging if you ask me.
This all screams of the Horus Ra as the Archontic Parasite thread in terms of the infection to the base chalkra by a dark shadow alien parasite.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit



Ra is a dark entity coming from another Universe, a universe archetypally situated behind our universe. There is dark out there, no physical bodies, no light, no love, no souls. This Ra entity places implants on the tailbone, below the sacrum, from where he hangs on to the abductee’s body, parasiting the persona and performing a perverse type of mind control. Ra may come and go to his liking.

[greybeard]

If we get opinions and assumptions out of the way ---what are we left with?

An apology of abuse ---which was withdrawn from Simon's web site.
It was pointed out to him that he had abused, then he admitted as part of that, that he abused women.
It was blamed on his father.

Can it ever be appropriate to abuse?-
Have to be told by a friend that you did --blame it on your father--ban your father from your life--then the apology etc disappears.

People have been un-subscribed for less on Avalon--the forum had been a platform for Simon and he has been shown respect by most.
He has not respected several members who claim inappropriate counseling.

However spiritual one may be and forgiveness may be appropriate, any form of abuse can never be justified or accepted. thats my opinion.

Mistakes I have made and owned up to them without reservation or justification--blame shifting.

I hope I follow my own thoughts and let this be as it is.

Chris
Ps
In the interest of accuracy
I used the word abuse---On the apology Simon used the word attack

[Andre]

If we get opinions and assumptions out of the way ---what are we left with? An apology of abuse ---which was withdrawn from Simon's web site. Chris

Can anyone post a copy of the apology that Simon removed from his website? I have only heard Simon's explanation that it was his father using him so I am particularly interested in seeing any evidence that contradicts this admission.

[Sierra]

Onawah,

I'm up to speed, and so is the mod team. There have been several threads on the subject of Simon Parkes, and IMO, it's rehashing now. Again. I cannot immerse myself, go to the level of detail on a personality that you wish me to. I have no motivation to give me the energy.

Like you, I don't know anyone who is perfect. I'm not expecting perfection from anyone. I'm saying look at the whole person, know what there is to know, and act accordingly.

If you find someone is speaking dishonestly, keeping stuff hidden, using people for sex, justifying mixed or ambiguous communication to the detriment of others, then that is something to be taken. Into consideration. Not glossed over with high flown rhetoric.

Innocent Warrior hit the nail on the head, respect for truth is so important. Otherwise conversation is sort of pointless, it's just a story. Usually with an agenda.

It's okay to be whatever one is, as long as one is honest about it. If one wants to be married, AND engaged to another woman, it's cool, as long as one doesn't have wives/lovers expecting monogamy. If someone says to me, I'm in an open marriage and I'd love to screw you, I'd say, nah, my husband is the one and only, and we made promises to each other. It's not rocket science.

I think judgement has its place when directed inward, and at best is a tool for self examination of one's own behaviors.

I disagree with your (personal opinion) agenda, I don't think it is necessary, Simon is a big boy, and he can start being honest tomorrow if he wants to. No more confusion, no muddy waters, no dashed expectations, Simon is in an open marriage but maybe he needs to let his wife know this so she can have fun too. Or leave if the revealed situation is not what she wants. But the have cake and eat it too (under the table) routine, tch, tch, I click in Mantid...

How easy everything would be without subterfuge. Lies are high maintenance, take lots of energy, and hurt those being lied to. Not necessary in this day and age, as long as it is with full knowledge and consent, between adults.

Onawah, I see you can't see what I describe, that must be upsetting. I'll leave you in possession of the field since you are not hearing what I say, and I am not willing to put out the effort you are. It's a gale force wind in my face, lol. Political parties use inundation tactics too, and that is what this feels like. I leave you the field, and bow out.

:bowing:


Adios.

[Sierra]

Are you sure you covered all the bases Onawah?

I think I'm skipping a lot of what you say because I've learned the constant justification on your part interferes with my coming to my own interpretation of the situation. Also you say you know this, you know that, here is another extenuating circumstance, and I also find that distracting from the real issue, using people for sex. I found most of what you said to be future oriented, how you would like Simon to behave in the future. Expectations, hmmmm... You have a LOT of expectations of how you want Simon to behave. Now we're supposed to believe it wasn't Simon screwing these people, it was his daddy. Oh. I'm not sure this relates to anything else I've read about experiencers, that one must screw to "help" people. Usually the experiencers are the violated ones. As well, the vast majority of people using people for sex, do so because they want to have sex. I'm having a hard time removing Simon from this category. Bottom line: I think if Simon had been honest(er) he would have asked ya wanna screw, rather than you need to screw me so I can get rid of entities, and of which behavior I truly think is more likely to give you entities, not remove them.
If what I say is considered vicious, well, sometimes hearing the truth is truly painful, especially when one did not expect to get busted by people comparing notes.

Sierra, next to your Avatar, it indicates you are an "Administrator". Does that mean you are a forum moderator or what? I ask because it would seem totally inappropriate for a moderator to posting in this way. I'm confused. Please clarify. Thanks.

Sure. I'm not wearing my mod hat. If I were, I'd preface my statements with:

== Mod Hat On ==

Otherwise, I'm speaking as a regular member.

If you find my post inappropriate, you can report it to the mod team. Mods have been reported in the past, and no one turned into an ogre about it... :)

[greybeard]

If we get opinions and assumptions out of the way ---what are we left with? An apology of abuse ---which was withdrawn from Simon's web site. Chris

Can anyone post a copy of the apology that Simon removed from his website? I have only heard Simon's explanation that it was his father using him so I am particularly interested in seeing any evidence that contradicts this admission.

Here you go its on this thread--via this link
Chris

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91971-Galactic-Connection-Show-19th-July-2016-Simon-Parkes-Responds-To-The-Community&p=1083183&viewfull=1#post1083183

[Innocent Warrior]

Wrong and right are fairly simple in terms of human interaction.
Are you taking the energy from the human energy fields of those you come in contact with or are you enhancing them.
This is what empathic people are capable of doing, we are feeling the interaction on our energy field. And with enough time, you are able to feel the intentions of others in so far as their designs concerning this matter.
This is all you have to do. You do not have to get into the story and try to figure out if Simon's story has any validity to it, just figure out his intentions.
I will always reserve the right to judge people. And I will do so harshly.
We need to exercise discernment more than ever before.
I appreciate your posts Innocent Warrior, but on this matter there really should be no standing on the fence.
This guy is a menace to the community you and I hold dear.
I understand folks in this community feel it is not kosher to call folks out, but when we find out folks are using a position as a spiritual advisor to further ingratiate and satisfy their own sexual needs. Come on, this is the old guru card and we can not stand for this.
And further more, it is spiritual parasitism. I don't think for a moment Simon Parks is lying about his child hood abductions, which make his couplings that much more creepier and damaging if you ask me.
This all screams of the Horus Ra as the Archontic Parasite thread in terms of the infection to the base chalkra by a dark shadow alien parasite.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?40941-Horus-Ra-as-the-Archontic-Alien-Parasite-A-follow-up-interview-with-Maarit



Ra is a dark entity coming from another Universe, a universe archetypally situated behind our universe. There is dark out there, no physical bodies, no light, no love, no souls. This Ra entity places implants on the tailbone, below the sacrum, from where he hangs on to the abductee’s body, parasiting the persona and performing a perverse type of mind control. Ra may come and go to his liking.

All solid points, DNA.

One point though, because I don't think I'm sitting on the fence - Truth without love and compassion feels baron to me, it feels more like a weapon then. Whether I call you out and say, "you are contradicting yourself" or "you are contradicting yourself and that's really bad", I have still said that you are contradicting yourself. If I choose the first option, and it can be shown to be true, then people will still have been offered the suggestion to question what you are saying. The result is still effective but without the negative charge and the fear (helpful to keep the extra dimensional effects in mind too).

I do see benefits in not judging but it is a personal choice, so you challenging my post seems fair to me.

I can discern things well in some ways, but in other ways I'm not so good at it, so thanks for the suggestions and info, appreciate it.

[Bill Ryan]

Can anyone post a copy of the apology that Simon removed from his website?

http://projectavalon.net/Simon_Parkes_public_apology_6_June_2016_sm.jpg

[Chester]

EDITED:

I cannot imagine a single poster that would in any way defend someone who clearly behaved in a way that it appears they mined this site for reasons other than to simply help others..

I cannot imagine anyone who would try to diminish the warnings from those who have far more information than they speak about regarding anyone that behaves in ways that could be clearly seen as harmful to others.

I hope my toning down of my original post does not take away the point.

[provolon]

Hi everybody, I am a hyper-sensitive person, and you can see my previous posts, I almost never post here, and I have some ideas to share:




1. I know Bill Ryan is a good person doing great service or humanity with this forum, his previous interviews, and much more.
2. I also believe Simon is a good person.
3. I do feel bad energies in this thread, I am also getting a headache on the left side of my head.



I could type more, since I had more ideas but yes.. my headache doesn't let me continue, so I would like to wish the best of the best to each and everyone of you.
I really hope we identify and kick dark influences from here, even if it's me! lol..

Big hug to everyone.

[onawah]

I am going to follow Provolon's fine example and bow out of this thread, which has turned into a veritable s---storm.

[3(C)+me]

This whole thread is really, from where i am sitting, about our beliefs about Simon. We will never know the actual person so we are struggling with our collective beliefs about who he is as a person and a pulblic figure/counselor.

We humans don't like changing our minds, once we have a idea about a person, we don't like to change it.

Simon may have helped many people but now we can't really ignore the fact that he may also be a
sick puppy too.

So sick that he should not be doing any counseling at all cuz it appears that some of these counseling sessions may have turned into
sexual hookup sessions and some of the details I have read are very disturbing.

The messenger counts, do you believe everything that comes out of the mouths of the Clinton's, Bush family, even if they actually told the truth, it comes from them, it's suspect.

Some brave radio show host should ask him about his sexual behavior toward his clients. There are probably more than we think.

Sierra, your posts as mentioned above were right on the mark.

There is a difference between judging someone and being discerning about same. We can be discerning without judgement. We can see what is going on without making said person into a all good all bad guy.

[Andre]

.
http://projectavalon.net/Simon_Parkes_public_apology_6_June_2016_sm.jpg

So, Simon's excuse is basically, "The devil made me do it"?! PLEASE tell me no one is gullible enough to buy that..

If you listen to Simon's explanation in the Galactic Connections video interview, he was asked point blank a series of questions around this very issue and he provided upfront, concise and truthful answers in which he clearly states that he did not manipulate anyone at any point. Simon works with energies and entities from dimensions other than 3D and he is dealing with very sinister forces on a daily basis. He explained how these forces have been interfering and masquerading as him. Basically, he was set-up. Is that so hard to believe, given the incredible light work he is doing?

[Andre]

Some brave radio show host should ask him about his sexual behavior toward his clients. There are probably more than we think. Sierra, your posts as mentioned above were right on the mark.

cccme, in reference to your suggestion "some brave radio show host should ask him about his sexual behavior towards clients" that is exactly what Alexandra did in the Galactic Connections interview.

On the basis of your remark alone, I can only conclude that you have not bothered to listen to that interview but are perhaps guilty, as some others appear to be, of joining a lynch mob.

If you had listened to the interview, you would not have made that particular remark, even if you agree or disagree with Simon or his opponents.

Alexandra is very pointed in her questioning of Simon in that interview. After stumbling on this thread, I decided to listen very carefully to the interview and investigate the accusations for myself. I came away convinced that Simon was sincere and honest in his answers and I now suspect that he has been set-up as a sexual predator in an effort to discredit him. Remember, setting-up someone as a sexual predator is exactly the kind of campaign the dark forces are experts at and they would most definitely target Simon.

[Flash]

André, this was not my comment but it was Biff comments from a previous post to which I answered. I can't believe someone post something positvie about Anu, I answer something about his total darkness, and you retake this positive post but attribute it to me.

This reaaaaallly looks dishonest. Please explain because....

I personnally think Annu stink darkness and malevolence. Always passing beside the glimmer of hope that might be presented to him, this is my point.

for the sake of understanding, here are the posts



Well, if you put Anu as the ultimate negative being, like none on earth is able to imagine, well, in this case, it would not be odd at all.




Quote Posted by Biff (here)



Quote when I was between the ages of three years old and six years old, the entity that I refer to as “dad”, that’s the white draconus Annu, put some sort of energy hook, that’s the best way I can describe it, the auric field of my body. And he was using that not solely go to visit women but also men as well to either try to sexually excite them or frighten them or what ever agenda he had.
That seems like odd behaviour for such an ancient being as the mythical Anu. I'd say if Simon's dad was a real being, it was never Anu but an imposter. But, I don't believe a word that comes from Simon's mouth, personally.









When I was between the ages of three years old and six years old, the entity that I refer to as “dad”, that’s the white draconus Annu, put some sort of energy hook, that’s the best way I can describe it, the auric field of my body. And he was using that not solely go to visit women but also men as well to either try to sexually excite them or frighten them or what ever agenda he had.

That seems like odd behaviour for such an ancient being as the mythical Anu. I'd say if Simon's dad was a real being, it was never Anu but an imposter.

Good question Flash! In fact, apart from all the other near meaningless accusations in this thread, you have asked one of the most critically interesting questions of all. It certainly doesn't sound like the behavior of the great Anu. Why would he need to act that way? Doesn't make a lot of sense, I agree.

[Andre]

André, this was not my comment but it was your ours from a previous post to which I answered. I can't believe you post something positvie about Anu, I answer something about his total darkness, and you retake your own positive post but attribute it to me.

This reaaaaallly looks dishonest. Please explain because.... I personally think Annu stink darkness and malevolence. Always passing beside the glimmer of hope that might be presented to him, this is my point.







When I was between the ages of three years old and six years old, the entity that I refer to as “dad”, that’s the white draconus Annu, put some sort of energy hook, that’s the best way I can describe it, the auric field of my body. And he was using that not solely go to visit women but also men as well to either try to sexually excite them or frighten them or what ever agenda he had.

That seems like odd behaviour for such an ancient being as the mythical Anu. I'd say if Simon's dad was a real being, it was never Anu but an imposter.

Good question Flash! In fact, apart from all the other near meaningless accusations in this thread, you have asked one of the most critically interesting questions of all. It certainly doesn't sound like the behavior of the great Anu. Why would he need to act that way? Doesn't make a lot of sense, I agree.

Flash, you may have simply assumed something inaccurate about my use of the word "great" Anu because I can't see any other part of my post that indicates I think highly of Anu. Hitler was "great" but it doesn't mean he was benevolent. Ghengis Khan was "great" but it doesn't mean he was benevolent. By great, I mean Anu has been around for hundreds of thousands of years and is the leader of the Annunaki. That is all I meant.

Who knows, perhaps in Simon's case it was Anu who decided to set-up his son because he was displeased with him. I do know that in the world of the Annunaki, that would be very, very consistent with their draconian mentality. Just a guess but not implausible. None of use really know what went on.

[Flash]

Now that I am finished with basically with this thread, I would like to add:

We are, through our imagination, will and intent, as a human collective, creating all that we live in and around. No dark thinking from us = Annu or any other dark specie/force cannot exist around us, period. We, by our thinking are sustaining their existence. WE ARE THE CREATORS OF IT ALL, we are not the victims, but the creators or all the role plays.

Just say NO to the darkness, a firm, without hesitation or equivocation, totally centered big huge fat NO. And action will naturally unfold - no victims, just centered beings.

Why not just change ourselves? why not just change our thinking?

The best example of it I saw it yesterday in a video: minute 5:37, the man tells he wants to hear nothing, nothing gently but firmly to a man admonishing an autistic kid and his parents, while other clients of the restaurant are comforting the mom, the child and the family. Firm NO, then taking care of our brothers/sisters. Intersting video which will show you at the same time what it is to have a high functioning autistic child.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ombfnpa75E

¤=[Post Update]=¤

I corrected my post below, your too fast :bigsmile:, it was Biff comment



André, this was not my comment but it was your ours from a previous post to which I answered. I can't believe you post something positvie about Anu, I answer something about his total darkness, and you retake your own positive post but attribute it to me.

This reaaaaallly looks dishonest. Please explain because.... I personally think Annu stink darkness and malevolence. Always passing beside the glimmer of hope that might be presented to him, this is my point.







When I was between the ages of three years old and six years old, the entity that I refer to as “dad”, that’s the white draconus Annu, put some sort of energy hook, that’s the best way I can describe it, the auric field of my body. And he was using that not solely go to visit women but also men as well to either try to sexually excite them or frighten them or what ever agenda he had.

That seems like odd behaviour for such an ancient being as the mythical Anu. I'd say if Simon's dad was a real being, it was never Anu but an imposter.

Good question Flash! In fact, apart from all the other near meaningless accusations in this thread, you have asked one of the most critically interesting questions of all. It certainly doesn't sound like the behavior of the great Anu. Why would he need to act that way? Doesn't make a lot of sense, I agree.

Flash, you may have simply assumed something inaccurate about my use of the word "great" Anu because I can't see any other part of my post that indicates I think highly of Anu. Hitler was "great" but it doesn't mean he was benevolent. Ghengis Khan was "great" but it doesn't mean he was benevolent. By great, I mean Anu has been around for hundreds of thousands of years and is the leader of the Annunaki. That is all I meant.

Who knows, perhaps in Simon's case it was Anu who decided to set-up his son because he was displeased with him. I do know that in the world of the Annunaki, that would be very, very consistent with their draconian mentality. Just a guess but not implausible. None of use really know what went on.

[3(C)+me]

I have listened to the interview and this is what he said, verbatim

"I have not gone and done this to people someone used me to go and upset and disturb them or whatever else"
"I want people to know that is not me"
"I was betrayed" Or he is a victim and innocent.

He claims he had no conscious knowledge that he was behaving in this way to others. No idea.

Really.

I am sorry but I just don't buy it.

His remarks about Avalon was a low blow. He attacks when people has concerns about him.
hum, ok.

And I don't want to lynch him or string him up.
Actually I wish him all the best.

[Innocent Warrior]

Some brave radio show host should ask him about his sexual behavior toward his clients. There are probably more than we think. Sierra, your posts as mentioned above were right on the mark.

cccme, in reference to your suggestion "some brave radio show host should ask him about his sexual behavior towards clients" that is exactly what Alexandra did in the Galactic Connections interview.

On the basis of your remark alone, I can only conclude that you have not bothered to listen to that interview but are perhaps guilty, as some others appear to be, of joining a lynch mob.

Here we go again, the ol' "lynch mob" catch phrase. Please allow me to remind you of the definition -


verb (used with object)
1.
to put to death, especially by hanging, by mob action and without legal authority.

An overly dramatic term to use in this situation isn't it?

Speaking of appearances, why do you even care so much about other people's opinions about this? You've said your piece, others have said their piece, but the members who buy into Simon's excuses appear to feel an unnaturally strong need to challenge others' views. Generally speaking, others are content to express their view and allow others their views, whether they agree or not. A lot of this thread is people defending themselves, and you want to pull out the lynch mob card? Why is that?

That just seems like some strange white elephant in the room to me.

[Sean]

Look, PA:

I love this site..but some of you need a SERIOUS reality check.

Simon used his status as a "galactic insider"to sexually exploit gullible women, and men also, by his own admission. And he's trying to blame an effin' spirit, or interdimensional being, or what the **** ever. And some of you are trying to EXPLAIN THAT AWAY. Simon is a sexual predator. Period. I no longer(well, lets be honest, I never did)believe anything he's said. He used his position to have sex..as I understand it, he led them to believe it would help with their "problem"..what is this dude, a "sexual scientologist"? "hey, I'll **** that demon right out of you. right this way".

PLEASE, some of you need to stop defending this nonsense. No one having the alien contact that Simon claims to have would behave this way..and they CERTAINLY wouldn't try to blame one of the interdimensionals he's supposedly in contact for it. In my best brooklynese.."get DA **** outta here'...

[lunaflare]

I never resonated with the mythology of Anu, Enki and co.

[greybeard]

.
http://projectavalon.net/Simon_Parkes_public_apology_6_June_2016_sm.jpg

So, Simon's excuse is basically, "The devil made me do it"?! PLEASE tell me no one is gullible enough to buy that..

If you listen to Simon's explanation in the Galactic Connections video interview, he was asked point blank a series of questions around this very issue and he provided upfront, concise and truthful answers in which he clearly states that he did not manipulate anyone at any point. Simon works with energies and entities from dimensions other than 3D and he is dealing with very sinister forces on a daily basis. He explained how these forces have been interfering and masquerading as him. Basically, he was set-up. Is that so hard to believe, given the incredible light work he is doing?

Andre

may be use full to look at the thread linked to get a background to why it seems that some members are anti Simon.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88999-Our-experience-with-Simon-Parkes-as-a-counselor&p=1047999&viewfull=1#post1047999

For myself I can not see that Simon brings anything new or of use to a genuine spiritual seeker.
Spiritual Truth has been spoken of for thousand of years and Is also to be found on this forum.
If you are interested in ultimate Truth perhaps a look at this thread will be helpful.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?43027-Enlightenment-A-direct-succinct-account-of-what-occurs...&p=456904&viewfull=1#post456904

Chris

[Agape]

Look, PA:

I love this site..but some of you need a SERIOUS reality check.

Simon used his status as a "galactic insider"to sexually exploit gullible women, and men also, by his own admission. And he's trying to blame an effin' spirit, or interdimensional being, or what the **** ever. And some of you are trying to EXPLAIN THAT AWAY. Simon is a sexual predator. Period. I no longer(well, lets be honest, I never did)believe anything he's said. He used his position to have sex..as I understand it, he led them to believe it would help with their "problem"..what is this dude, a "sexual scientologist"? "hey, I'll **** that demon right out of you. right this way".

PLEASE, some of you need to stop defending this nonsense. No one having the alien contact that Simon claims to have would behave this way..and they CERTAINLY wouldn't try to blame one of the interdimensionals he's supposedly in contact for it. In my best brooklynese.."get DA **** outta here'...



Yes they do . But as long as they ( no matter whom, includes the very foundation of this project ) are dealing with extra-dimensional entities , black magic ( anything from Alester Crowley to voodoo pretty goes with some people ..) , unsafe 'ET communications' , spirits and more spirits and these people rarely have had a good guidance and years of tutoring on how to recognise or relate to non-human entities generally,
there'll be a problem .

As long as I can tell , Simon keeps very cool and calm and even tries to apologise himself from the situation which is something only Englishman is capable of
but your audience here are completely a mixed bunch .
It's 2016 and being polite, well meant and cultured no longer works . Well meant and polite people keep retreating to countryside , mountains and generally run away from the urban levels of human society and its indiscriminate aggression towards each other.
Every such 'dense' human society is basically infested with spirits .

It would require much bigger power to tame them all.

The 'monster' taking over and threatening vulnerable people and sexual predators are all over net .

The situation with 'dark power space attacks' is something I've experienced couple of times in 2006 and before I quit being active on the ufocasebooks forum which was big group at that time and included quite few ET/Contact individuals and most of us were friends .
The attacks ( usually came through night ) did not origin from any 'active member' I know of . They were more likely coming from those who 'only read' but seen some of us with extreme criticism , mockery and hatred .
It would be completely futile to blame them on any known force or individual and once the blame game starts it has no end.

The moment I left there and was member of small private forum where all knew each other but postings were not exposed to public view , the attacks naturally stopped .

I was clairvoyant enough to know when some of my statements caused someones 'hatred' . Such could be religious in nature , sometimes it's 'racial' ( or ethnic ), sometimes philosophical .
Those who experience those 'dark spirits' in themselves seldom come out in open in fact and if they do, they can't control the power , they have to express how much they despise 'A or B' .
Sometimes they are recognised as 'trolls' and disposed off very fast, sometimes they keep lurking around for ages . But my point is , they're seldom too obvious .

I agree with people 'should do a reality check' and stop flying off handle spiritually when something goes wrong but the dangers of exposure and public 'consent' are too serious to overlook.
As prominent 'media personality' you're basically asking or relying on public 'consent' to continue your work and influence . That's not 'for free' . It's only for free if you do what you do , offer a guidance and stop taking care about how famous and important you're.
No One person are meant to be the most important person, forever and ever and ever .
If some are trying to maintain such status for too long it's usually done on behalf on everyone else and by manipulating them to giving you consent .

It's especially done through forums who collect people like those 'moth flying to light' ( as Carmody said another place ).

This is , very nasty 'war for souls' between some people high up in the hierarchy going on and effort to chess any major , powerful influence out.

Allegations of being 'sexual predator' are taken very seriously, especially nowadays and one of the nastiest things to throw on someone .

I'm also extremely sensitive and to be honest , I do not feel the energy comes from Simon or is associated with him , he may feel very confused about himself and what's going on , blame himself ( or his 'ET' ) and that all to utter pleasure of whoever are behind this.

I don't think there IS a fair way out of here actually, as long as there are very ignorant people/spirits behind their desks who will keep destroying every piece of well meant effort .
And as I said earlier, no exposure of this kind is meant forever or your life time .

The only option at the end is usually cutting all associations with public groups because having 'some fans' means we get about 10 times more 'enemies' ( stupids and mockers , generally ).
So if you want to do your work for others , not being a part of a group is the safest way to carry on .

Organisation of all kinds always fall on the same accord, disputes, corruptions , sexual scandals and what else .

Ask 'who did it' and you'd find perhaps there was about 100 ladies trying to have sex with Simon all at the solstice night ?

You know .. if it's me and people try to take advantage of me ..energetically and I don't like it , I do beat them out of it with 'hammer'.
And if I do it wrong they sometimes get their life lessons . Because some people don't respond to 'gentle'.
Some are 'power obsessed' , they want to 'experience' the power . They're 'experience freaks' . They do love controversies and arguments and they do love themselves a lot as long as they can subjugate about everyone else .


:happy dog:

[Andre]

May be useful to look at the threads linked to get a background to why it seems that some members are anti Simon.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88999-Our-experience-with-Simon-Parkes-as-a-counselor&p=1047999&viewfull=1#post1047999

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?43027-Enlightenment-A-direct-succinct-account-of-what-occurs...&p=456904&viewfull=1#post456904

Chris

Thanks greybeard. I was wanting to track down the source of all these venomous attacks made on Simon because I want to know the truth of the matter. If Simon is not the Lightworker I believe him to be, I would like to know the facts. Unfortunately, I cannot find a link to the original accusations about sexual misconduct, so thank you for providing the links you did. (I have tried to do my own searches but i was not very successful).

I went through every page of the threads you provided and others searching for the term "sex" in relation to Simon (that search term will also show "sexual"). Alberto and Daniela's entire thread is about counseling ethics, not about any sexual behavior.

I am searching for the sexual related posts because it goes to the core of the many accusations made against Simon in this thread, so there must be other posts somewhere?

Another reason I am being so persistent here is because I am suspicious when someone is labelled a "sexual predator" because it is one of the favorite techniques used by the dark forces to malign someone.

There is nothing about "sex" or "sexual" in the following threads about Simon so does anyone know where these posts are located please?


Our Experience With Simon Parkes as a contactee (split from "Our experience with Simon Parkes as a counselor" thread)
Re: Our experience with Simon Parkes as a counselor
Re: Galactic Connection Show 19th July 2016 - Simon Parkes Responds To The Community

[Andre]

.... Simon used his status as a "galactic insider"to sexually exploit gullible women, and men also, by his own admission. And he's trying to blame an effin' spirit, or interdimensional being, or what the **** ever. And some of you are trying to EXPLAIN THAT AWAY. Simon is a sexual predator. Period. I no longer (well, lets be honest, I never did) believe anything he's said. He used his position to have sex..as I understand it, he led them to believe it would help with their "problem"..what is this dude, a "sexual Scientologist"? "hey, I'll **** that demon right out of you. right this way". PLEASE, some of you need to stop defending this nonsense. No one having the alien contact that Simon claims to have would behave this way and they CERTAINLY wouldn't try to blame one of the interdimensionals he's supposedly in contact for it.

Workingactor, would you be so kind as to provide the source of your information that Simon is a sexual predator who exploited gullible women by his own admission, etc. I'm not sure that anyone has provided these links. I can't find anything other than the posts that relate to Simon's counseling skills. I have listened to Simon's interviews, and it certainly isn't in there and I have tried to search for posts that relate to this issue, but no luck. I seem to be the only one that hasn't read them and like most truth seekers I consider it important to go to the source in these matters!

Many thanks.

[greybeard]

Andre all respect for you.

I tend not to take others word for any thing--I like to cross check as many sources as I can--the truth can be elusive.
There does seem to be a weight of evidence that Simon is not the best bet for counseling.

As for the rest I have not investigated except his advice not to go into the light after the death of the body--that is totally "alien" to all that I have read--studied for over thirty years. My interest being the " path" of enlightenment--Self realization--which is well documented and In my opinion that is the Ultimate Truth.

Chris

[Agape]

Workingactor, would you be so kind as to provide the source of your information that Simon is a sexual predator who exploited gullible women by his own admission, etc. I'm not sure that anyone has provided these links. I can't find anything other than the posts that relate to Simon's counseling skills. I have listened to Simon's interviews, and it certainly isn't in there and I have tried to search for posts that relate to this issue, but no luck. I seem to be the only one that hasn't read them and like most truth seekers I consider it important to go to the source in these matters!

Many thanks.

Andre: it's not been discussed in explicit manner but it's been responded to ..

( Bills reply to you on previous page and quote from Simons website )

and Simon himself explains his idea about what's really happened in the interview with Alexandra ( OP ).


There's ( fortunately ) no 'source material' of that kind in existence , so far it's 'stories' ( aka private testimonies of several experiencers who happened to be mistreated - in their own words - through consulting with him ).

Now how much does any such 'experiencer' consider their frustration and perception as factual is extremely difficult to asses because ..
you know .. many people do keep having both good and bad psychic experiences all life,
and of them .. and in reality, vast number of such 'experiences' aren't a true or guiding moment in the still vaster web of life neither can be those people called in for presumed 'objective credibility' as psychics .

So this truly is ''only'' ( big caveat ) war for souls. And souls are better pure and free and fearless .

[The Royal Wizard]

Just wonder....these sexual alligations...are they real? Does someone KNOW, or is there some person somewhere claiming Simon actually took sexual advantage of them?

I have listened to the intervju, but cannot find anywhere Simon admitting to such actions.

All the best

TRW

[Sierra]

Yes. It is known. I'm not going to name names.

[Chester]

Just wonder....these sexual alligations...are they real? Does someone KNOW, or is there some person somewhere claiming Simon actually took sexual advantage of them?

I have listened to the intervju, but cannot find anywhere Simon admitting to such actions.

All the best

TRW

Simon probably prefers as best he can to avoid lawsuits.

[The Royal Wizard]

What kind of proof? How meny names?

All the best

TRW

[greybeard]

Oh well make what you will of this.

This Morning (TV Program)
Labour councillor claims he 'had his first sexual experience with an alien when he was six' on This Morning

A Labour councillor who claimed on a Channel 4 documentary that he had fathered a child with an alien today said he was six years-old when he had his first extra-terrestrial sexual experience.

Simon Parkes, a representative for Stakesby in Whitby, showed ITV’s This Morning hosts Philip Schofield and Holly Willoughby a picture he'd drawn of the first alien he ever met, describing it as “a green creature, about 7ft tall, wearing a purple robe”.

Claiming that the alien had big eyes and body like an insect, he explained: “The creature reached into the cot that I was in, lifted me up and I was tilted over to look straight into its face.”

Asked whether the aliens had been concerned about their sexual partner’s young age, the now 52-year-old replied: “No because, it’s about experience and your soul.”

He added that alien technology differed from the Hollywood stereotype of a flying saucer in that the other-worldly being travelled in a “teardrop shaped craft with the blunt end going forward and the pointy end at the back.”


Labour councillor claims he 'had his first sexual experience with an alien when he was six' on This Morning

16:15, 25 Jun 2013
Updated 16:36, 25 Jun 2013
By Natalie Evans

Simon Parkes, representative for Stakesby in Whitby, previously claimed on a Channel 4 documentary that he has 'fathered a child with an alien called the Cat Queen'

ITV Simon Parkes
First alien Simon Parkes met was "a green creature, about 7ft tall, wearing a purple robe"

A Labour councillor who claimed on a Channel 4 documentary that he had fathered a child with an alien today said he was six years-old when he had his first extra-terrestrial sexual experience.

Simon Parkes, a representative for Stakesby in Whitby, showed ITV’s This Morning hosts Philip Schofield and Holly Willoughby a picture he'd drawn of the first alien he ever met, describing it as “a green creature, about 7ft tall, wearing a purple robe”.

Claiming that the alien had big eyes and body like an insect, he explained: “The creature reached into the cot that I was in, lifted me up and I was tilted over to look straight into its face.”

Asked whether the aliens had been concerned about their sexual partner’s young age, the now 52-year-old replied: “No because, it’s about experience and your soul.”

He added that alien technology differed from the Hollywood stereotype of a flying saucer in that the other-worldly being travelled in a “teardrop shaped craft with the blunt end going forward and the pointy end at the back.”

ITV Simon Parkes
"The creature reached into the cot that I was in, lifted me up and I was tilted over to look straight into its face"

And according to the father of three (humans), his last encounter with beings came six weeks ago when one visited to give him a “health check”.

Previously, Simon has said that has relations with an alien referred to as the Cat Queen four times a year.

The driving instructor even claims to have fathered an extra terrestrial lovechild called Zarka and says having sex with the alien has caused tension in his marriage.

He is reported to have told the Northern Echo: “What will happen is that we will hold hands and I will say ‘I’m ready’ and then the technology I don’t understand will take us up to a craft orbiting the earth.

“My wife found out about it and was very unhappy, clearly. That caused a few problems, but it is not on a human level, so I don’t see it as wrong.”

http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/labour-councillor-claims-had-first-1964321

[marique3652]

I think I truly like old big family mommies!!!:highfive: re: Marique 3652

Thank you so much Flash! I am mother to two biological sons and raised nine foster sons as well from the time they were little until grown. (I now have many grandchildren, such a nice benefit)! I was foster mom to children that the State could not place due to many of them being psychologically troubled or physically handicapped and simply put, no one wanted them. Children deserve to have loving parents and a safe environment to grow and prosper, and it was the joy of my life to be able to help these wonderful children to have a loving home and people who love them and keep them from harm. The joy I had being mother to so many is immeasurable. Also it was quite challenging as well as each child had special needs one way or the other, but worth every moment. My sons used to call me "Mari, mother of millions", which always made me laugh. Mother's Day is a joyous event for me as you can imagine, lol. I have to say I had my hands full, but now life seems so dull in comparison.

[Sierra]

What kind of proof? How meny names?

All the best

TRW

You have got to be kidding me.

[Chester]

What kind of proof? How meny names?

All the best

TRW

You have got to be kidding me.

This is why I am one step away from giving up on this community.

You are right - "You have got to be kidding me"

You have got to be kidding me that anyone can avoid their own personal responsibility in the making of their own serious mistakes. "Daddy made me do it, but everyone is safe now because I kicked Daddy out of my life."

How can anyone not see how ludicrous this is? What sort of world will we have if all anyone has to say is that their 4th dimensional 'father figure' was actually using their 3rd dimensional physical body vehicle to perpetrate self admitted abuses of several others for the supposed satisfaction of this 4D being and that now they finally see that (thanks to a friend pointing it out) and that no one has to worry anymore as the 4D real bad guy (certainly not the 3D 'me') has been removed from the opportunity to harm others.

You have got to be kidding me is exactly right.

[The Royal Wizard]

I am not discussing his excuses, I am asking about the proof for very serious allegations; "sexual predator". If thats kidding someone....

All the best

TRW

[marique3652]

I tend to pay attention to contradictions, even if small ones. I raised 11 sons and it was most important to notice "contradictions" in what they told me, because it was those contradictions (usually because my son could not keep his "story" straight) that alerted me to look into things further.................................................................

As you would probably agree in your experience with your sons, let's wait and see if these minor contradictions lead to something? Personally, I doubt there is enough there to lead to anything. But until someone puts something a bit more substantial on the table than accusations that revolve around when Simon lost confidence in this forum, I would suggest that this thread is turning into a witch hunt by people who seem to be claiming some kind of moral high ground.

If someone doesn't believe what Simon has to offer, fine, but why do so many feel the need to go out of their way to put him down and judge him so readily? Remember that Christian saying "let he who is without sin caste the first stone"?

Simon is not perfect and I don't get that he tries to pretend to be. He has done amazing work and continues to do so.

Just to clarify because I think you misinterpreted what I was trying to say, I was not finding fault with Simon, was simply pointing out that inconsistencies can sometimes indicate there is a problem so they are worth questioning in general. I was not trying to discredit anything that Simon might have shared here, just saying that one should always be aware of inconsistencies and not ignore them. I am not advocating throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Just saying that it is good to "check the temperature of the water before one submerges oneself, lest one might get burned, which applies to life and well as just bathwater." :emptybath:

[RunningDeer]

This is why I am one step away from giving up on this community.

Sam, if you mean this community as in Avalon, know that I am one of many. Speaking for myself, please don’t compare me to those few that for whatever reason post to: charge-up, be noticed, incite, or fill in the blank(s) _________.

As for myself? If and when that day comes, I'll leave because it's time.

Thanks,
RunningDeer

:offtopic: Mods, you are welcome to remove.

[greybeard]

This is why I am one step away from giving up on this community.

Sam, if you mean this community as in Avalon, know that I am one of many. Speaking for myself, please don’t compare me to those few that for whatever reason post to: charge-up, be noticed, incite, or fill in the blank(s) _________.

As for myself? If and when that day comes, I'll leave because it's time.

Thanks,
RunningDeer

:offtopic: Mods, you are welcome to remove.

Paula--I agree --the main body of Avalon would not even entertain this thread far less be contentious.
Its a good place to be.

Chris

[Sierra]

I am not discussing his excuses, I am asking about the proof for very serious allegations; "sexual predator". If thats kidding someone....

All the best

TRW

Right. Ask the sixty women Mr. Cosby says he did not drug and rape. Ask the ten women who stepped forward after Gretchen Carlsen, and Megyn Kelly came forward about Ailes.

I suspect, gosh I just don't know why honey, but I suspect there would never be enough "proof".

[ThePythonicCow]

I am not discussing his excuses, I am asking about the proof for very serious allegations; "sexual predator". If thats kidding someone....

All the best

TRW
You've got to be kidding me. I can only conclude that it is patently obvious to you that such proof, to the standards you apparently would accept, will not be forthcoming here, for dang good reasons, and that your real intention in persisting in your "asking" is likely not an intention that most of the rest of us would support.

[Bluegreen]

... (deleted) ...

[Alberto e Daniela]

We came to know about the accusations of sexual "visits" received by women after consulting with Simon, when we were part of the Connecting Consciousness Facebook group (*).

One day a member of the group revealed he had heard the same story over and over from several women of the C.C. group, and he could no longer believe this was a coincidence. Despite formerly being, like most of us there, a supporter of Simon's, this person clearly stated his opinion that there was a sexual abuse scheme going on. Simon rejected such allegations and showed being offended.

Back then, he did not even mention the possibility of being used by some entity
[ NOTE - how can we trust his ability to see inside us, if he clearly could not see inside himself ? ]

When visiting personally this member of the group, we met his partner, who is one of those women, and confirmed receiving the unwanted visit after a skype session with Simon.

Graybeard reminded us that Simon regularly receives a "Health Check" from his Mantid family or group. This adds another inconsistency, because such a (supposedly) advanced race (technologically and psychically) never told him he had a huge reptile attached, who was using him as a puppet.


(*) Note: Connecting Consciousness was a private fb group set up by Simon, where he invited those who had had skype sessions with him. Lately this group was disbanded by Simon, but most members have been invited to a similar group, run by his aide Fran.

[Chester]

This is why I am one step away from giving up on this community.

Sam, if you mean this community as in Avalon, know that I am one of many. Speaking for myself, please don’t compare me to those few that for whatever reason post to: charge-up, be noticed, incite, or fill in the blank(s) _________.

As for myself? If and when that day comes, I'll leave because it's time.

Thanks,
RunningDeer

:offtopic: Mods, you are welcome to remove.

Thanks for the direct question, Running Deer -

No - not Avalon... the alternative community is what I referenced and I should have been better about what I meant and specific. I have noticed an uncomfortable trend across much of the alternative community where they "love/light" over clearly unacceptable behavior. Where anyone who raises concerns (so that some among the vulnerable might avoid what they would prefer to avoid) is attacked when that information comes from multiple, credible sources who have track records of reason and sound mindedness. Where those with fantastical stories too often are raised to rock star status where those who have had real experiences and most importantly very sound and well considered reflections on those experiences are largely ignored. Don't think I am not also pointing the finger at myself albeit earlier in my experiences in this community. I just wish the community as a whole would mature such that real, truthful information might be featured and where thoughtful and well balanced considerations about other worldly experiences are expressed and discussed and where the vulnerable are less exploited. Sadly probably just wishful thinking on my part.

The asking for proof at this point is best responded to by suggesting the individual do their own research and then make acquaintances with those they can discern have reasonably sound mind and judgment and then they will probably get up to speed.

If anything, that Avalon is allowing careful discussion of the matter (me being probably one of the riskier ones and so I am doing my best not to go to far) says a great deal about Avalon (and I mean that in a positive way).

In fact, I will soon be making a post on my blog which I am certain will not be liked by many folks out there but I predict none of those who will take exception to my upcoming post will be members of Avalon.

[Alberto e Daniela]

After watching the interview where Simon addresses this "Anu" or "Dad" issue with Alexandra Meadors, some interesting comments are in order:

- Whan Fran tells him about receiving a visit of someone posing as Simon, he says that in order to do that, someone should have an energetic connection, or his DNA, and this triggered his Eureka moment; but when several people reported being visited by him at night, he dismissed that as "someone posing as him". Such incoherence certainly deserves being pondered.

- Alexandra does not ask the necessary questions (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88999-Our-experience-with-Simon-Parkes-as-a-counselor&p=1079870&viewfull=1#post1079870), which most victims of "Anu's mischiefs" would like to see asked and answered.

First of all we wonder how anyone could accept Simon's very vague description of what was done to the people who trusted him for a session.
His mild words to describe what the "attacks" perpetrated by his Dad actually did to the victims, are like "upset, disturbed or something else".

Hey, a powerful negative entity has been acting through him for years on his "patients", and neither Simon nor Alexandra take a minute to inquire about:

1) which techniques his "Dad" has used onto the subjects that Simon was counseling
2) which consequences this has left inside of them
3) why did he never do a full scan of himself before working on others?

There is plenty of praise for Simon, but nobody defends the interests of the weak, who have been abused.

Is this to be considered a fair interview?

Another question is a must, since both Alexandra and Simon mention a raising in consciousness happening on Earth: what level of self awareness Simon believes he has, which let him act under a massive and harmful alien control, while claiming to be able to help others get rid of that same problem he would not see in himself?

After all the manipulations that he has suffered since childhood, and we feel for him, the list of such tragic discoveries could go on and on.

[Sean]

We came to know about the accusations of sexual "visits" received by women after consulting with Simon, when we were part of the Connecting Consciousness Facebook group (*).

One day a member of the group revealed he had heard the same story over and over from several women of the C.C. group, and he could no longer believe this was a coincidence. Despite formerly being, like most of us there, a supporter of Simon's, this person clearly stated his opinion that there was a sexual abuse scheme going on. Simon rejected such allegations and showed being offended.

Back then, he did not even mention the possibility of being used by some entity
[ NOTE - how can we trust his ability to see inside us, if he clearly could not see inside himself ? ]

When visiting personally this member of the group, we met his partner, who is one of those women, and confirmed receiving the unwanted visit after a skype session with Simon.

Graybeard reminded us that Simon regularly receives a "Health Check" from his Mantid family or group. This adds another inconsistency, because such a (supposedly) advanced race (technologically and psychically) never told him he had a huge reptile attached, who was using him as a puppet.


(*) Note: Connecting Consciousness was a private fb group set up by Simon, where he invited those who had had skype sessions with him. Lately this group was disbanded by Simon, but most members have been invited to a similar group, run by his aide Fran.

The bolded bit blows Simon out of the water.

I'm fairly certain "being controlled by a hostile alien intelligence who wants to make his "host" sexually assault people qualifies as a "health issue" to the Mantids :)

C'mon guys. This is just another "Shane"-type deal. I've said it before: We are ALL capable of the things Simon "claims" he can do. Stop looking for Superman. Save yourself.

[greybeard]

In the interest of accuracy I did not say that "Graybeard reminded us that Simon regularly receives a "Health Check" from his Mantid family or group."

It is is in the newspaper article that I posted which reminded Alberto and his partner as per the bit highlighted in Working actors post

Link to what I posted here

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91971-Galactic-Connection-Show-19th-July-2016-Simon-Parkes-Responds-To-The-Community&p=1083685&viewfull=1#post1083685

[Andre]

Workingactor, would you be so kind as to provide the source of your information that Simon is a sexual predator who exploited gullible women by his own admission, etc. I'm not sure that anyone has provided these links. Many thanks.

Andre: it's not been discussed in explicit manner but it's been responded to .. Bills reply to you on previous page and quote from Simons website ... and Simon himself explains his idea about what's really happened in the interview with Alexandra (OP). There's ( fortunately ) no 'source material' of that kind in existence , so far it's 'stories' ( aka private testimonies of several experiencers who happened to be mistreated - in their own words - through consulting with him ).

Thanks for you reply Agape as I am trying to find-out if this thread was anything more than a witch hunt.

You refer me to Bill's reply but that makes no reference to Simon being a sexual predator and nor does Simon's website.

If, as you say, the subject of Simon's so-called "sexual predator" behavior has not been "discussed in an explicit manner" and there is "no source material" then where have these toxic accusations come from?????

You refer to "private testimonies of several experiencers who have been mistreated". May I inquire where are these "private testimonies" that you have read other than Alberta and Daniela who make no mention of sexual behavior?

Many thanks.

[Andre]

I have not investigated except his [Simon's] advice not to go into the light after the death of the body--that is totally "alien" to all that I have read--studied for over thirty years. Chris

Hi again Chris. I also recall Simon talking about this but my interpretation of what Simon is trying to say is a bit different to your's. I believe he is suggesting not to follow the light in the tunnel that so many encounter in near death experiences (the ones that are sent back to complete unfinished business). There are many different forms of Light in higher dimensions, and I think Simon is merely suggesting that we try to discern which Light we gravitate towards and which Light we follow. It makes sense to me that 4th dimensional/astral entities with ulterior motives would endeavor to trap human souls when they leave their bodies, so I have taken Simon's warning in that context.

[greybeard]

Not wishing to labor a point but the soul can not be captured according to all that I have learned over many years single minded study of the path tp enlightenment.

Best wishes
Chris

[Agape]

Not wishing to labor a point but the soul can not be captured according to all that I have learned over many years single minded study of the path tp enlightenment.

Best wishes
Chris


Chris ( good morning to you ), neither I wish to .. but with respect to you and the advaita ( non-duality ) teachings ,
there's also 'nothing to be discussed here' . I know you understand.

But those most precious teachings are intended for people capable of such mighty understanding beyond-understanding ,
they can not withstand any argument in debate .

Soul 'can not be captured' but it can becomes seriously deluded . It's merely a matter of terms .

Not all are set on the path to knowledge as their main task and direction , they don't make such awareness the measure of their own path .

Non-duality is deep and mysterious and beyond everything .

But it can't stand the argument people pose and live as 'human life'.

You know :pray:

[Andre]

Not wishing to labor a point but the soul cannot be captured according to all that I have learned over many years single minded study of the path to enlightenment. Best wishes, Chris

Sorry. Bad use of the word "soul" in my post. I agree. The soul cannot be captured. I should have been more accurate and used the word "dis-incarnate human" or perhaps the "astral body".

[Agape]

If, as you say, the subject of Simon's so-called "sexual predator" behavior has not been "discussed in an explicit manner" and there is "no source material" then where have these toxic accusations come from?????

You refer to "private testimonies of several experiencers who have been mistreated". May I inquire where are these "private testimonies" that you have read other than Alberta and Daniela who make no mention of sexual behavior?

Many thanks.



I've seen few and read few over the years, there are snippets of them in some peoples private 'experiencer' type videos on youtube ,

Daniella and Alberto are merely two people who rose the alarms - naturally - and came to complain to Bill Ryan.

I strongly disagree with much what's been going on in past decade around this subject in broad terms and for me personally ,

I chose the path of truth and love and learning in life . And I happened to be so privileged to have quite few ET contact experiences during my life ,
my testimony was also recorded for the PA/PC Project .
Though , I feel like total odd ball not only here , just anywhere I go , for not willing to step down to the level where other 'experiencers' go and start 'telling fancy stories' .

From my side of overview and larger perspective that is based both on many worthy philosophical teachings and years of practice AND personal experience of 'communion' , communication through the ET contact,
ET contact is rare , it's completely distinguishable from everything else - the whole array of human psychic experiences , 99,99% of what people attribute to ET contact 'experiences' are in fact psychic /spiritual experiences
that fall under one or another category but are all 'mighty human'.

Like Chris said , I'm not going to earn another brownie point for saying so repeatedly and I have warned people about this since 10 years ago when I came out with my data and on to internet .


From social and spiritual point of view , telling people worldwide that you consider yourself someone very special is very risky avenue and literally selling your 'soul' to the mass trends , is what Simon did.

As workingactor said well, we all are capable of the same thing , good and bad. Each person have their depths they seldom share , they could create their own religion if they wanted to , they could claim themselves the only child of God ( their name ) and the descended Master . Because this is who human kind is and well meant to be.
Simon is but one Being on his path , living his story .

Right from the days back when this forum was still supporting his claims and the discussion went on .. I found very difficult to comment.

For me the debate about ETs is fine with people who are genuine enough, subtle and gentle enough , intelligent enough to be able to hold the energy levels ,
there 'talking or not' , all has some albeit limited meaning .

Give the information to 3D humans and they'll drag the energy down to their level of gross experiences, desire , anger , ignorance.
They'll get nightmares of monsters and sex with aliens .

I have said so repeatedly and in previous thread as well though couple of my posts happened to be deleted that I disagree with turning ET contact to gnostic teachings and vice versa.


.

If I did not explain myself explicitly enough : I don't think/see/agree that any ET entity ( Simons ET Dad ) are responsible for peoples psychic experiences .
It may be or may not be but from what I know, those Beings are too subtle to go this low . They're not around 'in scout ships' ( though some 'contactees' seem to allude to it ) to visit your clients and friends frequently .

Anyone can do this, predator spirit who are member of his group or even distantly related . It's not easy to find out and 'source' the energy/entity and get rid of them but ultimately, you probably could - if you worked together and had that knowledge.

It would be easier to invite unbiased 'shaman' from another unrelated spiritual circle working through other methods , someone who is strictly speaking , not biased towards or against Simon or anyone in the group ,
so it can't be Bill Ryan or me or anyone even distantly related to this collective because we all have had our 'share' here ,
and help to get rid of the trouble.

If you can't do that and trying to resolve issues from 'within the group' it's as Andre said , not more than witch hunt and claims of experience against claims.


The best I could come up with on Sunday ,

:angel:

[Andre]

I am not discussing his excuses, I am asking about the proof for very serious allegations; "sexual predator". If that's kidding someone....All the bestTRW
Right. Ask the sixty women Mr. Cosby says he did not drug and rape. Ask the ten women who stepped forward after Gretchen Carlsen, and Megyn Kelly came forward about Ailes. I suspect, gosh I just don't know why honey, but I suspect there would never be enough "proof".

I'm with The Royal Wizard, I have studied this thread over and over and the level of the toxic accusations against Simon are totally disproportionate to the facts that have so far been presented. I'm not saying Simon is innocent, but you and several others have found him guilty based on very little hard core evidence. And does this Ailes have anything to do with Simon? It is very unclear to me why they are relevant?

[araucaria]

The term ‘witch-hunt’ describes one negative way in which the community deals with its psychiatric and/or criminal fringe of ‘deviant’ individuals. It is negative because instead of restricting the fringe, it helps it to become mainstream, by producing many false positives notably among the creative fringe, who are exploring some advanced area ahead of the rest. If there is any type of witch-hunt going on, then some of the hunted would appear to be... among the hunters.

Disclaimer: the following are the comment of a concerned but unqualified poster. The issue here indeed is whether anyone at all is qualified to speak on certain matters. There are two sorts of somewhat qualified professions who would need consulting, in mental health and the legal system. But they are never involved until a mental health case or crime is reported to them. And when this does happen, they are not fully qualified to handle certain cases. Since both professions are called upon to respond to the causes of disruption to social harmony, the current state of human society is indication enough that they are underperforming, both through too many undetected cases and underqualification to deal with what comes to them – which are basically two ways of saying the same thing: too much is passing under the radar.

One area of underqualification is the ET picture of old souls having an experience as (initially) young humans. The soul contract is in contradiction with the mainstream view of a child having an immature brain/mind. For the first time Simon Parkes has admitted that from the age of 3 something started happening to him to which he did not consent. From a human mental health and legal standpoint, at barely half the age of reason, he could not consent to anything; in fact he could not do so until much later when he reached the legal age of consent. Sometimes, a 15-year-old girl will seem to run off consentingly with an older man. Her consent counts for nothing, and there is a legal case to be answered. The soul contract is one very handy way for getting round the law undetected.

However, it is even easier to cause trouble by bypassing even more stringent mental health recommendations. It is not illegal for a parent to walk out on their family, even though broken families do not provide the ideal start in life for any child. Note how Simon was fatherless, and practically motherless as well even before his mother was murdered. Worse still, the male presence in the household was provided by secret service agents. These may be government personnel, but they don’t even need to ‘get round the law’: they are above the law. I am sure a psychiatrist (but none has been consulted) would have plenty to say about a young child’s unusual experiences of ‘Mummy’ and Daddy’, filling the blanks with entities from elsewhere, and would take a very dim view of the associated soul contract fine print. He would also very much categorize this person as a patient, and definitely not a colleague. As it happens, psychiatry has its own category of whistle-blowers, dissatisfied ‘service users’, ‘consumers’, ‘survivors’ – they have several names for themselves – who organize themselves in advocacy groups that are an extremely helpful part of the mental health care system (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychiatric_survivors_movement). But they do not claim to supplant the professional or copy the professional’s relationship with a client/patient. That would make no sense, for if, instead of alleviating a problem, psychiatry is just another process that has to be survived, you cannot change that by continuing with provenly inadequate techniques. We are groping for fresh approaches, and these groups offer more evidence that group interaction with fellow-sufferers empathizing can often do more good than an asymmetrical one-on-one sufferer-curer relationship.

Since a forum such as Avalon operates on the lines of an advocacy group, another handy way these days to disrupt social harmony is irresponsible (or simply careless or insufficiently informed) talk on the Internet, especially when aimed at such sites. So Agape’s remark may very well be true:

It's especially done through forums who collect people like those 'moth flying to light' ( as Carmody said another place ). http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91971-Galactic-Connection-Show-19th-July-2016-Simon-Parkes-Responds-To-The-Community&p=1083596&viewfull=1#post1083596 However, in the case of Simon it comes fifty years too late to explain how we arrived at this point. The irresponsible talk back then was coming from those secret service agents, both through their presence and in particular by allowing a small boy to explore secret German UFO documents, which has got to be child abuse by any standards. The end result is the same whether it was just opportunistic or careless (pointless) child abuse (MI5/6 careless??), or grooming with an eye to later exploitation, i.e. now, when Simon, a third-generation asset at least, has come out as an ET whistle-blower. In such circumstances, how this material has been processed is far too doubtful to serve as evidence of anything.

The fact that needs to be taken into account in the two sides to Simon Parkes is that there are two kinds of mental health sufferers: on the one hand you have the bona fide type (hopefully the vast majority) accepting they have a problem and in order to overcome it and relieve their symptoms cooperating with carers, which includes possibly objecting to their cruder methods. But on the other hand, that reaction is already a form of mental healthiness; others may be beyond this and actually actively undermining the process. Full-blown mental illness would respond to treatment in this negative way, making it virtually incurable. The same situation is clearer in regard to crime: most crime is done by people straying outside of the law somewhat inadvertently, but you also find hardened criminals who know very well what they are about – and may even join the police to divert attention.

Again, we basically have two ways of saying the same thing: crime and mental illness both cause social disharmony; in their extreme forms, both try to keep one step ahead in being undetectable, if detected unreportable, and if reported downplayable, i.e. guilty but not responsible; e.g. bona fide – just doing one’s best; or mental illness as an excuse for crime; or victimhood – having been abused as a mitigating circumstance of abuse – X made me do it, ISIS made me do it. With no claim to originality, I would suggest that the ET phenomenon is today an important part of that arsenal of escaping personal responsibility. It is not of course the only part of that arsenal, and I hasten to add, nor is it the only part of the ET phenomenon. I am not saying that benevolent ETs do not exist. However, they would have no part in the issue of non-humanity as the ultimate excuse for inhumanity; on the contrary, they would be on the side of humanity, and very possibly greater humanity than we generally find on this planet. To find such benevolent ET presence, the best place to look is not the testimony of Simon Parkes, mostly recounting the nightmares/ravings of a mentally abused immature mind. My point is that you don’t need to go off-planet to find this type of cultural clash: it can be found within a single terrestrial human individual. See this post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91692-Soft-underbellies&p=1079892&viewfull=1#post1079892) describing the case of a woman in Europe of African descent where both a court of law and its psychiatric reports are seen to be floundering to explain how she came to kill her child.

[Agape]

Excellent post Araucaria (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91971-Galactic-Connection-Show-19th-July-2016-Simon-Parkes-Responds-To-The-Community&p=1084125&viewfull=1#post1084125) , I think that those who read your post above and are willing to give a second thought to whatever has been discussed and alluded to in past by Simon himself get a chance to realise how very complicated if not impossible cases like this turn up once 'fallen' to the diverse and dispersed continuum of human psychoanalysis.

Something I'd like to add here on side note : in my life long experience and I'm merely being honest here,
the ET contact 'experience' is easy to 'read' either with children or adults who are not mental health sufferers at the same time .

It does not mean that you may be prone to psychic discomfort or disorder in other time of your life or struggle with psychic experiences of human category the next year or 10 years later , or never , the link between the two would be too complicated to outline here but it's a human link mostly .

The reason why I say so is that while during ET contact , the very pinnacle of your intellectual, exploratory and emotional capacity is utilised which in itself requires at least 3 mental factors to work in unison ,
that is you need to be undisturbed ( mentally ) , open - whether it's called unbiased or fearless towards the experience and , able to function on your personal 'top level' at that time so that some kind of clear processing and memory retention could happen to you towards 'what' had you experienced ,

if you're experiencing serious breakdown at the same time , it's not impossible but it's quite improbable that you'd recall anything or be able to communicate to intelligences beyond human capacity etc.

It does happen of course and partial - if not full - reason for the mayhem prevalent among the ET contact 'experiencers' community that people , and older they're in our type of cultures, more worried and more conditioned they sometimes become , more cautious towards any kind of 'new contact' in general ( think of old people and how they don't want to meet new people anymore ) ,
it's almost rare that people would not experience 'mental fog' or carry few levels of their disturbed human psyche to the 'ET encounter' if such occurs and the result can be whole mixture of things,

amnesia of the event is most common, followed by many categories of mixed dream scenarios , snippets of impressions and so on.

Strangely enough, I don't think that regressions and digging to what's really happened help a lot because ad a/ most regression therapists/sessions don't or even can't go straight to the point , they instead keep accessing one or another layer of your psyche , each with different 'experiencer paradigm',
ad b/ offering more information to individuals and collective who are already bathing in breakdowns and paradigms tends to just 'add to the mess'.

Ad c/ there are no definitive answers any worldly authority is going to provide to you ,
big caveat.
For those who DO remember their ET contact or piece of clearly enough, you then knew how unique that was and knew no one in the human world will have better answers about ETs.
A biologist may claim to know 'all' about ants , it's still the ants who understand themselves best .
Moreover , advanced ET civilisation are not 'an ant' of my example and they don't wait and sit somewhere to be dissected by you , your milabs, your university departments whom some expect to have 'full data'. No, they don't.

So this is one price you are inevitably going to pay for the rest of your life for this 'boon'.
While you may meet few others with 'similar experience' , no one with 'yours' and many people with opinion on the matter including some well meant individuals and some not-so-well-meant individuals ,
there are aspects of the problematics we are bound NOT to understand for the rest of our natural human life times.

Anything beyond the research category is , in my humble opinion, going to end up in debacle or controversy at the end ..

[Agape]

Quoting Araucaria :



One area of underqualification is the ET picture of old souls having an experience as (initially) young humans. The soul contract is in contradiction with the mainstream view of a child having an immature brain/mind. For the first time Simon Parkes has admitted that from the age of 3 something started happening to him to which he did not consent. From a human mental health and legal standpoint, at barely half the age of reason, he could not consent to anything; in fact he could not do so until much later when he reached the legal age of consent. Sometimes, a 15-year-old girl will seem to run off consentingly with an older man. Her consent counts for nothing, and there is a legal case to be answered. The soul contract is one very handy way for getting round the law undetected.


This point itself is debatable , depending on circumstances of both individual and social development and maturity and there's possibly no legal or health care system that can successfully answer the question of 'how mature you were in that age to take such&such decision'.

Civilised human groups and societies tend to adopt set of laws that best fit and correspond - even approximately- to their social dynamics and psychological and physiognomical development of its members .

Practically and under circumstances , it does not exist 'the same way' .


I won't go to lengthy deliberations here as I fear people still do not respect my input a lot,
yes I fear stupid human beings -
and blame me mentally for whatever to which I'm sensitive and it's something I don't do to others so why should I deserve it from some troll sitting on the other side of the globe who know nothing about me , I don't .




Back to the topic. Under critical circumstances, wars for example , children as young as 5 or 6 years of age - that's hardly an age of 'maturity' or 'legal consent' were seen to be able to take up critical and sometimes selfless decisions,
in order to save their or others lives .
Conscience develops in children in various capacity in tiny age, some do experience themselves as 'being born with it' , others don't and experience it as something 'taught' and imposed upon them .

So whether Simon gave a 'consent' to his early age experience depends in my opinion on whether it was benevolent or malevolent type of experience /encounter .
It's all that pays with very young person usually because your body is too tiny and your human 'personality' almost non-existent and while you may have powerful brain/mind,
what really plays life role is the difference between good/bad and pleasure/pain. I'd object to disqualifying small kids automatically from the capacity of 'pure discernment' .
In many ancient cultures the elders chose small kids exactly for their pure capacity of discernment to resolve difficult questions, intuitively , not saying it's the way and probably far from your culture norm as we can get but such children do exist.

What the toddler inevitably misses - in any such parallel - is complicated thinking, critical thinking and long term vision .

Can tell you small and solid example from my own life .

My mum who was diabetic since I was 2 and half year old needed some level of supervision in case she would fall to either hypo- or hyperglycaemia ,
her and father both had backgrounds in medicine so there were no major fears but everyone had to be informed and ready to help , so was I , from when I was 4 or so .
I was also much oriented towards medicine and science ( shifted from wanting to be a veterinary towards human medicine ) , read my first anatomy book when I was 6.
After my parents divorced which was kind-of tragedy for the family I had and left mum helpless , I knew I had to look after her because the 'big guy' was selfish enough to leave. Mum suffered nervous breakdown , for couple of years that no one attended to in fact than I did ,
talking through it with her for evenings , she cried a lot .. one of her 'emotional threats' towards me was 'you are like dad , you'll get married and run away soon as you can' . It was threat, mum did turn abusive over the next couple of years, very emotional and hard to deal with .
I said 'no mum, you know I will take care of you for you till the end of your life , i will never get married' . I said that when I was 7.
Later, there were times , many times that I hoped I didn't . But I did and the point was critical enough, strong enough to make me follow the timeline .
I felt guilty and responsible for what father did and as anyone with conscience would realise, leaving a sick and vulnerable person alone to tend for themselves , with kid in care is sort-of a crime.
If I said a word , the legal services would take me away from her , put me to home or fathers care who had all the money and things that generally attract kids.
I won't tell you all the story now .. not my thread topic ( again ) but yes , we are sometimes capable of decisions that may not be fully mature decisions and change all .



:raining:

[araucaria]

Thank you Agape. Just one small comment however: when you say

A biologist may claim to know 'all' about ants , it's still the ants who understand themselves best .
Moreover , advanced ET civilisation are not 'an ant' of my example and they don't wait and sit somewhere to be dissected by you , your milabs, your university departments whom some expect to have 'full data'.
I think many, from a human standpoint, would say you have totally reversed the emphasis there. From their point of view, it is more germane and urgent to dispel fears of themselves being the ants under the biological microscope of ETs. Everything from sample collection, seed banks, cattle mutilation, human abduction and experiments to channelled wisdom from ET sources suggests that the balance of power through knowledge is weighted very heavily the other way. It does seem as though a tiny anthill Earth has been trodden on, whether inadvertently or otherwise, by some large ET boot, demonstrating, as you say a large dose of ignorance amid the study and partial knowledge and pseudo-superiority.

So, while I don’t think there is any danger any time soon of humans thinking they know all about ET, the opposite might not be true, or at any rate might not be perceived to be true. What needs to be established is a bit of balance between any two different species – synergy as opposed to parasitism of one sort or another. Between humans and cats, no one (except perhaps your biologist) knows or cares who’s in charge (many say it’s the cats:)): we happily cohabit and follow our different agendas which diverge and converge in various ways. When painful baggage is collected or released, we don’t necessarily diverge or converge any more or less, we are simply more or less comfortable together. For example, my daughter’s new cat was abandoned then kept for a year in a room with 20 other felines. When my daughter took her home, she was very scared and shy, but eventually, with an open door and the freedom of the planet, she evolved into a happy and grateful cat, doing if anything more catlike things and as well as more humanlike things such as enjoying the sights and smells of nature or a comfortable sofa.

Dogs are rather different; they only seem to thrive when they have a master able to train them. That is another form of synergy; a dog can live with a cat owner, but only if it is not treated like a cat. I guess any two species can sniff around each other for a while and come to some kind of working arrangement, if they can avoid being scary (with or without predation) and being scared. So yes, an ant knows best what it is to be an ant, but it gains that self-knowledge partly from contact with non-ants – which means it can evolve. For ant, read human; then for human, read ET.

[Agape]

I think many, from a human standpoint, would say you have totally reversed the emphasis there. From their point of view, it is more germane and urgent to dispel fears of themselves being the ants under the biological microscope of ETs. Everything from sample collection, seed banks, cattle mutilation, human abduction and experiments to channelled wisdom from ET sources suggests that the balance of power through knowledge is weighted very heavily the other way. It does seem as though a tiny anthill Earth has been trodden on, whether inadvertently or otherwise, by some large ET boot, demonstrating, as you say a large dose of ignorance amid the study and partial knowledge and pseudo-superiority.

Well, ( thank you Araucaria for the expansion of your thought here ),

I don't think I have , actually reversed an existing and frequently quoted emphasis on our human situation 'down here' which is more than obviously ,
far more similar to a situation of large anthill - tempting possible space explorer to step in and sample ( with gloves and masks , I suggest ) - than it may ever be otherwise in the humanly predictable future ,

and even then the parallel remains gross and incomplete , the one with the life of fruit flies I attempted in another thread not so long ago was far more fitting ,

Hybrid humans and their blood type (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?91944-Hybrid-humans-and-their-blood-type-O-negative&p=1083015&viewfull=1#post1083015)



If you're human biologist and test whether some kind of immunity response develops in fruit flies or not , the way you do it is by watching few tens of generations of them carrying the same gene and whether the 'factor' you've challenged is preserved, becomes dominant or recessive and what kind of consequences does it produce , over generations.
From the drosophila view point , he/she the fruit fly have no idea or way to find out even . They live few days is 'whole life' .

If the same is true for this accelerated human evolution and with life spans we currently enjoy
while being watched by some million years old advanced space civilisations

the chances that we find out and will be able to speak-to-them in human physical bodies are low - from this particular biological perspective - unless we can perhaps, live much longer )



and that's not the end of the metaphor of course but sums it up for me somewhat better .

So of course you're right about the 'emphasis reversal' that's hardly my creation, it was produced by many peoples claims about their governments and military 'in the know' and in possession of all from EBEs to ET technologies ,

and some of their statements could allude to the idea that there's a human or a superman on the planet who knows about 'everything' ,

I see curved logic behind that timeline of statements , logic that directly or not supports conflicts, building up of strategic war arsenals , threatening the other parties with 'we have much more in our pockets than you'd dream of' ,
then the other claiming or alluding to the same so there we're again,

the beginning of 21st century and someones dirty war, political and espionage games that grew over everyones head
so they do not hesitate to use the 'disclosure movement' and people of their own country to press the government down to 'give in' the secrets they perhaps,
even do not have ;

I mean well, probably they do but really not the way people are imagining it

and they hope the other people in other countries to do the same and creating a Troy horse, a monster , to trick people into believing something that is usable ,
and misusable

and guess what ?

The amount of real and realistic information that is actually ET sourced and could be verified actually exists but is minute and due to the presence of this monster-war machine ,
people who are professionals, scientists and generally those better equipped to investigate are fearing this monster more than anything,
more than any 'E.T.' since this humanly composited monster was seen to be responsible for the worst massacres and damage done to the human culture in past ..

like a group of crickets descending on a field ( or something like that ).


:bearhug:

[ThePythonicCow]

I'm not saying Simon is innocent, but you and several others have found him guilty based on very little hard core evidence.

Some have found Simon guilty, based on evidence not fully presented here. Neither you nor The Royal Wizard know entirely on what evidence they based their determination. We've not been told all that evidence here, and likely we won't be.

In other words, I would suggest it would be more accurate if you had written:

I'm not saying Simon is innocent, but you and several others have found him guilty, without presenting sufficient evidence on this tread to enable me to reach the same conclusion.

Fine - it's your choice what to think of this.

If I were sitting on a jury hearing a case against Simon on these matters, and no more evidence was presented to me than what has been posted here, I'd probably vote "Not Guilty", for I would likely find that the case has not been proven, by just the evidence posted here, beyond the legal meaning of "a reasonable doubt."

We are not however a legal sitting jury. We have no such standing, authority, jurisdiction or powers. Rather, some of those posting on this thread, or whose private comments are summarized by others posting on this thread are, from what I can tell, intending to serve a socially valuable function of alerting others to a potential risk.

In part as a result of this thread, Simon has recently said of himself:

And what I worked out was that when I was between the ages of three years old and six years old, the entity that I refer to as dad, thats the white draconus Annu, put some sort of energy hook, thats the best way I can describe it, the auric field of my body. And he was using that not solely go to visit women but also men as well to either try to sexually excite them or frighten them or what ever agenda he had.

Those words reaffirm to me the value of this thread. My thanks go out to those who have come forth to raise their concerns and raise a note of caution to others.

Furthermore, I share a concern better expressed by others that just saying (my paraphrasing):
that wasn't me, rather it was an entity that I have now rejected from my life, so all is well now, and besides you really can't hold me responsible for "what ever" happened before... just saying that doesn't cut the mustard in my book.

Both (1) Simon's responsibility for whatever might be his prior actions, and (2) the appropriate cautions to those engaging in the future with Simon in such potentially harmful endeavors, remain.

[araucaria]

I said 'no mum, you know I will take care of you for you till the end of your life , i will never get married' . I said that when I was 7.
Later, there were times , many times that I hoped I didn't . But I did and the point was critical [...]
I won't tell you all the story now .. not my thread topic ( again ) but yes , we are sometimes capable of decisions that may not be fully mature decisions and change all .
If we stay on the subject of childhood, we do not stray off-topic, as Simon’s childhood is critical to who and what he has become. At the same time, we move into general territory that is hugely more important than the single case of any one individual. So, far from straying off-topic, we are exploring the topicality of Simon Parkes in the broader scheme of things.

The big issue, in my view, is that we take children as being dependent (the legal term), and adults by implication as independent. Raising children therefore involves giving them as much independence as possible as early as possible. When this process breaks down, you have dysfunctional families of dependent children becoming dependent adults and the whole thing becomes a nightmare. There has been a great deal said about the dysfunctional family, of which royalty and other elites are the most egregious example. If you are born to rule, then that is actually, and paradoxically, the ultimate straitjacket: your life is more or less set in stone before you are born; your family, the nation, the whole world depends upon you fulfilling your destiny. You are infinitely less free than the lowliest of your subjects. That’s what needs to be changed.

Basically we are raising kittens as if they were puppies. The problem is that dogs cannot raise puppies to be like dogs: they end up reverting to being like wolves. At first they will look for their master, or another master. When they find none their predatory instincts previously held in check take over again, and maybe turn on the sheep they used to guard. Man has gone through several masters, the gods, God, now ET for some; perhaps he is beginning to understand that he is on his own (but not alone).

If this change is going to happen, we need to look at the closer-to-ideal situation where independent adults raise children to be independent. Independence for a child includes the irresponsibility of living in a fantasy world where nothing is for real and any decisions are reversible. He has the time to think things through. When you arrive from a relatively timeless place you have to learn that time is on your side, it does not have to be your enemy. Here is an example to show how a child can get ahead of himself. When he was small, my son used to say at night, ‘I don’t want to go to school’, and I’d say, ‘That’s great, because there’s no school right now; it’s time for bed!’ Then he wanted to be a car mechanic, because he wouldn’t have to wash his hands. Since he ended up a surgeon, washing his hands at all hours of the day and night, I tend to think he was getting ahead of himself again; by the time he was washing his hands, it was no longer an issue, because human vehicle maintenance had the advantage of running his brain through the gears as well. So his original childish idea was not wrong; it had simply grown so much bigger. And it did so in a secret place undisturbed by any outside, especially parental influence. All in his own good time and left to his own devices: when the time came to choose a direction, he made his unexpected choice unprompted.

So independence means presence without interference. Simon Parkes’s childhood seems to have been the exact opposite: a web of dependence with minimal outside presence and maximum interference; interference notably with respect to time: not just exposure to things beyond his years, but exposure to nonhuman concepts of time. Time is planet-based, meaning that you learn to adjust to the planet in order to lead a life of harmony right here and now, or you try to impose your exotic settings and expect the planet and its inhabitants to adjust: they won’t. If Earth time is constant, the perception of it accelerates from childhood to old age; in other words we are experiencing the exact opposite of your fruit fly aspiring to become an ‘advanced’ biologist since a human life is one of devolution from near-eternal being to ephemeron. Life is slow when you have a whole lifetime ahead of you (and when paradoxically you are growing/changing fastest), but extremely fleeting by the time you only have a day more to live (and set in your ways, often to the point of total sclerosis). Hence if we are to see the human experience as a valid one – and of course it is as valid as any other – then we have to be able to reverse our logic. In other words, while aspiring to the stars and to become higher beings, we need to accept that we are also on this opposite trajectory where the higher beings who have longer to live are like children compared with the ancient may-flies they will become.

So which way are we evolving? From a non-dualistic viewpoint, we are evolving both ways. From a non-dualistic viewpoint, we are trying to evolve without devolving and discovering that the reverse is also happening. From the standpoint of eternity, it makes not the slightest difference where you find yourself since you have ‘all the time in the world’ to travel in both directions right round this circle. From the standpoint of finite time, it makes not the slightest difference how long you have left to live if you live in the present instant, as flies do naturally and certain long-lived races have great trouble trying to get their heads round. The best way forward for humans is still to study humans: ‘know thyself’ being where the information is to be found in a form comprehensible to humans.


If you're human biologist and test whether some kind of immunity response develops in fruit flies or not , the way you do it is by watching few tens of generations of them carrying the same gene and whether the 'factor' you've challenged is preserved, becomes dominant or recessive and what kind of consequences does it produce , over generations.
From the drosophila view point , he/she the fruit fly have no idea or way to find out even . They live few days is 'whole life' .

If the same is true for this accelerated human evolution and with life spans we currently enjoy
while being watched by some million years old advanced space civilisations

the chances that we find out and will be able to speak-to-them in human physical bodies are low - from this particular biological perspective - unless we can perhaps, live much longer )

[greybeard]

Regarding what Paul and others on the thread and other threads have said

The bottom line for me is.
Would I consult Simon and would I feel concern for those who did or might in the future?

Truth is long before this and similar threads occurred I was wary of Simon, my view/opinion has not changed.

I dont think Simon has done anything illegal.

Chris

[Agape]

Araucaria, thanks again for your input , I can but try to offer you some of my perspective bellow though , we're coming to this problematics each from completely different conceptual environment and on either side that's not easy to fix at once .
Thinking you can ( or I can ) in brief article would be like thinking we can fix all the human paradigm as it stands and fix the 'rift' between polarities that predate evolution of modern humankind and version of evolutionary psychology as presented to us today by millions ( and millions of years ),
the gap - rift between male and female brain , gap between Eastern and Western philosophical approaches ,
generally a rift that is very real despite being overlooked and suppressed ,
rift between human civilisations and learning paths that evolved in deep past, continents apart , were isolated from each other for thousands of years before they came together again,
and it's fairly possible that there's no meaning in trying to do 'heal the gap' and that it can not be done , from purely evolutionary perspective ,
they have to coexist together and connect intuitively , like right and left hand spirals each turning in opposite direction , like left and right hemisphere of the brain .

It's hardly a first time I'm observing this phenomenon.

Using an example - a metaphor or parallel gives each of your 'brain halves' entirely separate option for interpretation.
An example offered to or by Vedic scholar is usually interpreted quite differently by Western based psychologist and philosopher , each based in their own cultural environment and logical pathways that evolved over very long time.

In short , cohesion in this case is not an option that can be forced , it can only evolve .



So which way are we evolving? From a non-dualistic viewpoint, we are evolving both ways.

This question itself troubles the brain of many evolutionary biologists some of whom feel quite firm about their presumed opinion .
The question would have to be further specified by you and whether you limit your understanding to specific human lineage who evolve supposedly, well and linearly forwards or whether you refer to mankind as a whole ,
which entails both evolution and devolution trajectory being present at all times .

Even from individual perspective , it's been observed that development of human intelligence is specific and compartmentalised in its 'selectivity' while sacrificing organic or psychological functions we don't use or need , temporarily or in our life times anymore .
There's more capacity 'stuffed' in your DNA , humanly speaking over the millions of years humans lived on Earth than we can ever discuss, explore or disclose ( =make obvious ).


Lets try not to override our competencies and psychological limitations incurred by the circumstances of this communication alone though .






If we stay on the subject of childhood, we do not stray off-topic, as Simon’s childhood is critical to who and what he has become. At the same time, we move into general territory that is hugely more important than the single case of any one individual. So, far from straying off-topic, we are exploring the topicality of Simon Parkes in the broader scheme of things.

The big issue, in my view, is that we take children as being dependent (the legal term), and adults by implication as independent. Raising children therefore involves giving them as much independence as possible as early as possible. When this process breaks down, you have dysfunctional families of dependent children becoming dependent adults and the whole thing becomes a nightmare. There has been a great deal said about the dysfunctional family, of which royalty and other elites are the most egregious example. If you are born to rule, then that is actually, and paradoxically, the ultimate straitjacket: your life is more or less set in stone before you are born; your family, the nation, the whole world depends upon you fulfilling your destiny. You are infinitely less free than the lowliest of your subjects. That’s what needs to be changed.



I fear I'd have to be blunt here ( not just with respect to your comments , generally ) to say what I see but it's proved more important over long time to maintain stability and good level of discussion among all those many people involved in the debate
than increasing our 'sharpness' .

As Lao'tze says in his last advice to the dying Empire .. ( looking from the 20th century perspectives of course ) and the book about Tao and the Way was allegedly compiled by him under coercion by border patrol when he ( the sage ) in beggars disguise tried to cross the border to Tibet , heading for more peaceful life .. :ROFL:

..decreasing ones own sharpness ,
dimming ones own blazing glow ,
organising own chaos
and identifying with own dust
is the only way of Heavenly Tao. ..


From any sort of psychological perspective however , I don't feel that regressing Simon Parkes to his toddler age , over and over again, either helps him to resolve issues or that it brings you /or us together closer to the source and 'true contact with ET' that would be genuinely reliable information.

From a point of view of adult psychologist and far as I'm aware of , and even from the trained Eastern oriented philosophical and practical school of thought ,
regressing yourself to toddler age can be done with certain marginal objectives and outcomes and no solid based psychoanalysis or regression should dwell on the process as sole footing of investigation and therapy or re-animate clients /patients/practitioners experiences of that age in prolonged manner and ad nauseam.

The dangers of doing so repeatedly and forcibly rest in tempering with early development of personality that is in that age - no matter what it bears - shrouded in safe cocoon of unconscious mind ,
unlike our adult mind , the shielding is there to allow healthy evolution of human personality later on without being bombarded by myriads of reflections and self-reflections any adult mind engages in and what we call 'being aware of too much',
all the information, all the parallels, all the pros and cons.

In short , I can't see how such a process would be really healthy and substantial source of information and self awareness for 50 plus year old human male or otherwise .

...

You may want to object how this is not the case here and Simon is actually connecting to his 'ET personality' through those regressions.

But what has happened to his organic human brain over the 50 years , can guess ? It's evolved and it's experiencing many developmental hiccups over years,
it's nevertheless and irreversibly a brain of human adult with systemic neuro-circuits evolved enough so they keep function as an adult, 50 year old town councillor Simon Parkes , father of family etc.

Where was his 'ET mind' all those years ?

We don't know.

But reconnecting fully developed human brain and rewiring it essentially to different pathways , of ET nature , be it a specific ET race or even several of them is not easy .

Most naturally and under circumstances the brain wave and its function gravitates towards the environment he's exposed to the most, the human environment .
The space for 'free fluctuation' of that brain wave that would be also functionally capable also decreases with its specialisation,
i.e, the brain gravitates to developing 'strong stand' rather than having the luxury of 'free think' at all times,
and proportionally - to compare child and adult brain functionality .

So going back to Simons regressions with Joanne Summerscales , it seems to me that the work remained unfinished and perhaps also,
Joanne as therapist was not able to either 'close the tear' as every regression therapist should be able to do in order to prevent damage after retriggering personal trauma and left him in 'loop' psychologically ,
or could not continue and guide him any further beyond that age .

When this happens , the part of the brain that connects to Simons ET contact is predominantly his 'children brain' , the immature residuum of that under normal circumstances is present in all of us but not used a lot
unless.. you reach an age of mental decline and retardation under which circumstances this part of brain keeps you alive and preserves your basic instincts .



The way I came to my awakening in this matter was possibly analogous but very different from Simons and I was about 28 at time of the big encounter in Bodhgaya which was very adult experience .
And although it had automatically 'rewired' me completely and connected to the circuits and experiences reaching far back to my childhood as well ,
the reason for how and why I came forwards at all was having fully mature recall at that time period that was not shrouded in the waters of subconscious mind ,
I did not get into this by meditating or regressing even if the years of meditation were complimentary to the process , I never developed or had to develop any sort of conscious effort in order to 'be the ET'.

Which all does not mean I'm not prone or sensitive to the human environment, if I lived in isolation from it or with others like me, I'd be more , being alone is the only way to settle in peace and resettle to be me at times,
when I have to function in the human world , I since also adopt the 'wave function' commonly shared among humans or , am coerced to it and I don't like it,
my brain does not like it and it protests , shuts down or anything similar.



I'll better finish this resume or pause at least but would like to ask everyone present to this debate for extreme sensitivity whatever it means to you.

Thanks forwards :bearhug:

[Agape]

Portraying Simon it the way that he was as an important whistle blower etc to my mind, brings the alternative comunity--conspiracy theorists into disrepute.
That is a shame.
Lets face it, believing a man who says he fathered a child with an alien beggars belief.
Its not biologically possible--i suspect.

All thanks to Albert e Daniela for starting this thread and other who fell foul of Simon's counseling --contributing here.
Also thanks to those who contacted Bill --privately.

The truth will out, I think it has beyond all reasonable doubt.




According to various ufology surveys and many independent reports including those from times long gone,
there are more than few hundreds of people , both males and females , around the globe who have experienced or claim to have experienced close contact with ETs and some who claim to have mothered or fathered hybrid babies .

I understand how intriguing that sounds to some , we can't make any good claims here of how that is 'biologically possible or not' ,
the one interesting facet of such reports is that they have surfaced from all kinds of cultures and places on the globe ,
long before the internet connected the broad public and information became so readily available .
Most participants /witnesses/ abductees are not well known individuals or pursuing name&fame with their claims .

To someone with no instance of experience of close ET Contact in their life and it may include some 'skeptical researchers' as well ,
all of the content of this board may sound ludicrous .

Unless that ever happened to you , speaking of ET contact in general, you can't make any sense of this I suppose .

But looking to ( remembering ) old fairytales and legends and I do think each of them may contain at least the proverbial golden seed of truth ,
cases like that were reported since mankind existed . Sometimes it was 'gods' marrying humans , fairies falling love with humans , dragons abducting princesses ,
sometimes either of them had children together who were 'special' and carried unique characteristics of both kinds .
Quite often the experiment failed as naturally as it started or did not have a good ending , there are many classical fairytale examples of that hailing from many different cultures too.

Once again and unless you've experienced close ET contact your self I am aware how this does not make great sense to you the reader and fairytales for you will remain in the fairytale land .

There's not much that any of us can do about it .

It's also quite hard and once you find yourself in 'magical trap' with off-worlders to 'cross the line' and seek human help , for the simple fact that 'normal humans' probably won't trust you and help you
unless they're somehow very old, wise and experienced humans .


Concerning the letter posted here (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?88999-Our-experience-with-Simon-Parkes-as-a-counselor&p=1084425&viewfull=1#post1084425), I don't see how this would be more 'intelligent , well composed or informatory' one compared to the thousands of similar letters
''Dear Sally'' receives every week.

Tell me of one person including the very founders of this project and anyone present who are free of relationship problems ,
or anyone who does not portray themselves as 'bright and honest' individual in their resume , tell me of any 'brave male or female ' who would admit guilt at divorce court or otherwise after leaving their partner in trouble or someone who did not experience 'betrayal' in their life .


This includes your teachers, doctors, parents , politicians ... , also dogs :dog: and cats :cat:. :ROFL:


I hope that everyone can have some laugh at what they did with their 'human life' when it's over and that the lady 'so concerned' is happier now for not entering to relationship with Simon.

The letter also contains some confounding clues about the writer and their intents which do not explain anything to anyone, at all.



:cocktail:

[Agape]

Quite like in the great story about Urashima Taro and his journey to the Kingdom of Dragon King ..and back ..

like usually , he returned home penniless , forgot the princess and aged in 3 days and was then buried ceremonially in his native village , in a conch shell

http://i290.photobucket.com/albums/ll256/PaldenLhamo/Urashima_Taro-1916_zpszp19segs.jpg (http://s290.photobucket.com/user/PaldenLhamo/media/Urashima_Taro-1916_zpszp19segs.jpg.html)

Japanese fairytale

Here you can read the whole story and listen to the audio , depending on your choice ..

THE STORY OF URASHIMA TARO, THE FISHER LAD (http://etc.usf.edu/lit2go/72/japanese-fairy-tales/4881/the-story-of-urashima-taro-the-fisher-lad/)


http://i290.photobucket.com/albums/ll256/PaldenLhamo/Taro_zpsmvecxisd.jpg (http://s290.photobucket.com/user/PaldenLhamo/media/Taro_zpsmvecxisd.jpg.html)



There's no greater story than I'm telling you :heart:





The emphasis and the wisdom of the story is of course , in the human point of view ..


in the Kingdom of Dragon King in between time passes slowly , each grain of sand
counting the tides of our civilisations rise and fall,
silent witness to the mystery ..



Don't fall from the back of golden turtle little Urashima waves can be treacherous


:star:

[Chester]

OJ got off the criminal charges but he was successfully sued in civil court.

Yet those who went after them were strong folks and certainly not vulnerable like the folks that go to MK Ultra / Satanic Ritual Abuse "counselors."

Regardless - if this were a licensed therapist, the license would have been revoked based on the complaints received by the credible folks in this community.

We (in this community) do not have that sort of protection and the biggest reason why is because "we (at least most of us) don't trust those types of authorities." And so with this in mind, this is why this situation has been handled as it has. The folks here at Avalon stepped up.

If I were compromised as such:

1.) I would immediately stop all "counseling."

2.) I would remove myself from any further public appearances that in any way continue the promotion of my "material."

3.) I would seek both conventional and "other" therapy and work seriously upon myself.

4.) I would never be "Mr. Mantid / Daddy Drac Messenger / Savior / Whistle Blower / Insider guy" again and instead find a way to be myself as that should really be good enough.

[greybeard]

Integrity Sam---If one does not have that, what then!!!

Chris

[greybeard]

Lets assume it is possible for a "human" to father or be mother to an alien/hybrid child.
If the human is already in a marriage to another human--think of the hurt cause to spouse by going out and declaring on national TV that not only did you have intercourse with an alien but you produced a child by that union.
Letters to Dear Sally tend to be anonymous--seeking help--not an identifiable person.
Accepting that the majority of humans have had relationship problems.

Chris

[lightpotential]

To Sam and Greybeard,

Your points Sam were all good. Simon’s reputation as a psychic reader/healer lies in ruins.

In terms of his explanation that another entity somehow psychically raped/assaulted those he had sessions with, and that it was not him… I can only say, sadly, that on the face of it, this explanation is totally pathetic. I do not mean this in any crude way as such, and I hope that it is not understood in that way. I simply mean as a statement of fact, that his explanation is pathetic.

I could almost think that if he were not British, but an American Televangelist, he would have said: “I have Sinned,” Jimmy Swaggart style.

How could anyone have confidence in him now? My understanding is that he intends and has kept the appointments of the many dozens of individuals signed up to his 30 minute sessions who have paid.

His basic story as I understand it, is that he had a ‘psychic contamination’ since about 3 years old. He has just become aware of it, has done some sort of ‘deep scan,’ solved the problem, and now it is full steam ahead. He posted a brief statement about it and then took it down after only 2 hours.

This is hardly comforting.

And this brings me to your point Greybeard. Integrity. That truly is the word to consider here.

Simon knows he has done wrong, and he wants to cover this up, or cover over it. And that we can see this, means that he is exposed.

Only a few weeks ago I was seriously thinking of booking a soul reading session with Simon. And then, after not coming into the Avalon Forum for ages, even though I signed up years ago and do not post that often; that this story emerges now, I am inclined to think that this was divine providence acting to prevent me from booking a session with him.

Everything I have ever heard Simon say, I now question its veracity. And this makes me sad. I wish it were not so.


Sincerely

Keith

[ThePythonicCow]

This includes your teachers, doctors, parents , politicians ... , also dogs :dog: and cats :cat:. :ROFL:
Just because my cat can never get her fur perfectly clean, doesn't mean she doesn't keep cleaning it.

Just because we are all imperfect beings, doesn't mean that we should abide by all manner of imperfections.

[Chester]

Integrity Sam---If one does not have that, what then!!!

Chris

That's it frankly... if you can't trust someone, how can you possibly trust their renditions of their other-worldy, unprovable "stories?"

How can you trust the validations (by citing testimony from others who do not also show impeccable integrity as often turns out to be the case).

How can anyone bite on the attempts not just by the experiencers but the presenters (which are obvious opportunists who know they are new age snake oil salesmen selling false hope) to validate these supposed insider's missions, conclusions, predictions and messages to humanity by using the lines like "s/he corraborates my other insider sources." These "stars" are just like the successful "reality TV actors" who "get it" and play along by joining in with the "mutual verifier's club.

And perhaps most important of all, how can anyone consider the paradigms these story tellers suggest as not just true for that experiencer (or perhaps the group [club] they belong to) but true for everyone. - As just one example - "The Light Trap" paradigm.

This is nothing but mind control via meme implantation. I fell for it for years but no more folks. I hope each individual wakes up and considers the likelihood that they won't ever have it all figured out but accepting this may be far, far better than thinking we do when we are actually living in Alice's Wonderland with risks to our dignity (imagine how some of those "counseled folk" feel today) much less to our wasted time and money.

extending from my previous post -

5.) Give back all the money held for pre-paid appointments that have not occurred.

6.) Make a plan on providing restitution for those harmed and/or defrauded.

Bottom line - Do the right thing. And this should go for everyone who has emerged in this community to become a public figure looked up to by the rest - do the right thing.

If your story is mostly (or all BS) - come clean.

If you see you have maybe fallen for an overactive imagination and/or a desire to be "heard" and/or you have a drive within you to make a difference but have compromised the truth for the sake of gaining greater attention... come clean, do the right thing.

If this happened, community wide, we could then go to the next level of community maturation where perhaps we can get back to truths instead of fantasy. We might find that much of the things we thought were "true" in the current accepted definition of "truth" (something set in 3D stone) is perhaps nothing of the sort. We might (for example) discover that though many other-worldly experiences greatly differ, especially with 3D linear thinking that seems to invalidate all sorts of competing paradigms - we just might discover something common to them all that lies beneath them all... something beyond all previous theories that may be the actual truths of what is behind much of these phenomena.