PDA

View Full Version : 9/11 - The New Pearl Harbor - by far the best 9/11 doc I have ever seen



Spellbound
21st August 2016, 03:57
I tried to see if this had been posted before but couldn't find anything so I wanted to offer up this little ditty. It is, by far, the best documentary on the subject of 9/11. They go over everything and go on to debunk the debunkers (Popular Mechanics). It's a tad long, but well worth the time. Better than Loose Change...better than Rich Man's Trick even.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M

Dave - Toronto

Dash
21st August 2016, 10:32
Keep this simple, don't get boged down and distracted by the minutiae..

Consider; if you drop a ball from that height it will take about 10 seconds to reach the ground unimpeded. When demolished all buildings suffer a so called pan cake effect which is the upper floor banging into the lower floor, this extends the total collapse time from around 40 seconds to 4 minutes.
The only way the building can fall in the absolute minimum time of 10 seconds is if all floor supporting walls disappeared at the same time, all 110 floors have to be in free fall simultanously otherwise the time will be significantly extended, after all, there is a huge supporting weight and many floors to impede the progress is there not?

Ergo, if the impossible is ruled out, i.e. the planes could somehow remove 110 stories of supporting walls in less than 1 second, then the only conclusion is some outside entity deliberately removed all structural supporting walls simultaneously otherwise the laws of physics will not be obeyed. This is confirmed by the video evidence that shows the building turning to dust before it fell, unlike other demolitions it is unclear when the building actually hits the ground, we are talking half a million tonnes of steal and concrete so why does it not hit with a thud breaking the bathtub and if the building fell from top down as the planes hit the upper stories then the floors must fall onto each other, yes?

Its a long time since I studied grade school physics but really whats to be debated? Work out who turned the building to dust and you have the people behind all the wars since at least 9/11 (IMO this goes back much further)

History is rewritten all the time, and the ignorance/gullibility of the masses never ceases to amaze me.
(don't want to appear arrogant but people need to educate themselves so they can draw more informed conclusions)

The list of discrepencies is long, Dr Judy Wood is a respected structural engineer of many years experience, she has written a detailed book with many equations, and is the hard physics based on observation and theory.
www.drjudywood.com/wtc/key.html

Anomalous to say the least,

The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain by a free fall speed "collapse."
They underwent mid-air pulverization and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.
The protective bathtub was not significantly damaged by the destruction of the Twin Towers.
The rail lines, the tunnels and most of the rail cars had only light damage, if any.
The WTC underground mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Bros. Road Runner and friends.
The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on a comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition.
The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not bottom up,
Evidence of molecular dissociation and transmutation, as demonstrated by the near-instant rusting of affected steel.
Weird fires. The appearance of fire, but without evidence of heating.
Lack of high heat. Witnesses reported that the initial dust cloud felt cooler than ambient temperatures. No evidence of burned bodies.
Columns were curled around a vertical axis like rolled-up carpets, where overloaded buckled beams should be bent around the horizontal axis.
Vertical round holes were cut into buildings 4, 5 and 6, and into Liberty street in front of Bankers Trust, and into Vesey Street in front of WTC6, plus a cylindrical arc was cut into Bankers Trust.
More damage was done to the bathtub by earth-moving equipment during the clean-up process than from the destruction of more than a million tons of buildings above it.
Uncanny similarities with the Hutchison Effect, where the Hutchison Effect exhibits all of the same phenomena listed above

Dash
21st August 2016, 10:46
Correction: the freefall is 9.2 seconds but you get the idea,

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/BBE/BBEpics/WTC-A4-150.jpg

WhiteLove
21st August 2016, 11:50
The reason why the cause of the 9/11 event and the reports on what happened that day are not fully true, is because there are too many too accurate and too important questions asked that have either no answers or answers that either do not fit when they are puzzled together or they are so low in rationale that they just lead to more questions or the answers have been made unavailable, for instance through security classification.

So there is a high level intervention that is part of why the mystery cannot be fully and easily resolved. This combined with the above and what we know, indicates the 9/11 event was some kind of inside job, that the enemy is within.

This documentary was incredibly good! It's like, the questions are so spot on that a baby can tell that the official 911 explanation is swimming in lies.

The fact that Silverstein bought the towers under such low rationale conditions, insuring the towers at such a vast amount of money with such costly issues to become owner of and was not present in the buildings when the 911 tragedy happened, indicates a possible insurance fraud and that Silverstein might somehow be connected to the gang that did this. It is a very odd circumstance and it is a very unlikely scenario that the leaseholder as well has his children and others were lucky all at the same time.

http://shoestring911.blogspot.se/2010/05/wtc-leaseholder-and-his-associates-that.html

BTW. Interesting that Silverstein in his history has has a trade related political connection/stake to the state of Israel. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Silverstein)

sigma6
22nd August 2016, 01:55
the building was designed to fall that way... right in the blueprint designs... that's how far back this was planned...

Mike Gorman
22nd August 2016, 06:32
If you look at the change in western politics, the flowering of 'Terror', the subsequent middle-east theater, the advent of ISIS (whatever names you wish to use) the fall of Libya & Gadaffi and the profound advent of increasingly repressive rules/regulation, the militarization of the Police forces throughout the west - post 9/11 developments it all points to a blueprint. Certainly the event of 9/11 is highly concerning, the details, the timing-this is the principal fulcrum on which the globalist push has used to unbalance us all. Obviously we are witnessing the execution of plans long drafted.