UFO Destroys Israeli Weaponised Satellite on the Launchpad.

[lucidity]

What i particularly like about this story...
is that there are actually pics of the rocket and the UFO.. in the same frame.

There is some precedent for UFO intervention of this kind:
The disarming of nuclear warheads, whilst still in their launch bunkers,
in the USA and USSR
(See Steve Greer's Press Conference for witness testimony on that)

Then there's the story of a UFO using laser beams to destroy a rocket after being
launched at Vandenberg
(see this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONsrx67le4Q )

So, perhaps it's not so far fetched to imagine that a UFO
might destroy a "weaponised" rocket on the launch pad.

For your reading pleasure:
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/09/02/ufo-destroys-israeli-weaponised-satellite-on-the-launch-pad/

be happy

lucidity :-)

[ninorc]

Thanks for that, but elsewhere on Veterans Today:

EXCLUSIVE: Why did the Israeli satellite blow up on the launchpad
(http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/09/03/exclusive-why-did-the-israeli-satellite-blow-up-on-the-launchpad/)
By Ian Greenhalgh on September 3, 2016

'Because someone fired an x-ray laser at it... this was a strictly terrestrial, explainable event where no aspect requires an esoteric, alien or other-worldly theory to explain away.'

[lucidity]

Thanks for that, but elsewhere on Veterans Today:

EXCLUSIVE: Why did the Israeli satellite blow up on the launchpad
(http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/09/03/exclusive-why-did-the-israeli-satellite-blow-up-on-the-launchpad/)
By Ian Greenhalgh on September 3, 2016

'Because someone fired an x-ray laser at it... this was a strictly terrestrial, explainable event where no aspect requires an esoteric, alien or other-worldly theory to explain away.'

Oh really ? So who fired the x-ray laser ?

So you're saying.... the UFO just happened to be a few hundred yards away.. Purely circumstantial... ?

Of-course, i don't know the truth. ... And neither do you. ;-)

[bluestflame]

perhaps this was a bigger threat than nukes , wonder what tech was on that rocket

[lucidity]

perhaps this was a bigger threat than nukes , wonder what tech was on that rocket

Yes.. i keep wondering what might have been on that rocket.
Some very powerful laser ?
Something to kill other satellites ?
Something to kill UFOs ?

Someone, somewhere, thought it would be better if this tech didn't reach orbit.
(Always assuming, of-course, that this wasn't an accident)

[Eram]

I am not familiar with lenses, focus and recording devices, but is it not possible that this alleged UFO was just an insect or bird that passed the view of the camera at close range?

arIc1NlHvV0

[Baby Steps]

If it was non terrestrial, it would be an act taken only after full ethical evaluation, subject to rules we may not even be able to imagine.

A device capable of beaming broadband, and receiving, from space would have to be very powerful, and contain its own AI. I would start there, we know that signals can act as carrier waves for something else, and certain frequencies can impact on the brain. So it easily could be a machine designed to do one task, that could easily be re-tasked, even the designers might not understand

I think there's a clue in the Kingsmen movie

[Citizen No2]

Deleted by me.

R

[Streamy]

Video put out by Dante Santori claiming to know who did this with the reason being that it was not a communications satellite, but instead a "chemtrail activator" for a future "final solution".

I8IOM6Whelg

[ninorc]

Oh really ? So who fired the x-ray laser ?

So you're saying.... the UFO just happened to be a few hundred yards away.. Purely circumstantial... ?

Of-course, i don't know the truth. ... And neither do you. ;-)

m8, I'm saying nothing. I merely pointed out that an alternative opinion to the one you posted is being expressed at the same source.

[DNA]

Thanks for that, but elsewhere on Veterans Today:

EXCLUSIVE: Why did the Israeli satellite blow up on the launchpad
(http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/09/03/exclusive-why-did-the-israeli-satellite-blow-up-on-the-launchpad/)
By Ian Greenhalgh on September 3, 2016

'Because someone fired an x-ray laser at it... this was a strictly terrestrial, explainable event where no aspect requires an esoteric, alien or other-worldly theory to explain away.'

Oh really ? So who fired the x-ray laser ?

So you're saying.... the UFO just happened to be a few hundred yards away.. Purely circumstantial... ?

Of-course, i don't know the truth. ... And neither do you. ;-)


I will state this, that UFO could have been a terrestrial UFO. The countries of Russia, the USA, China at the very least have antigravity in my opinion.
I suppose they may have gotten to the point of using drone type spheres.
But, just for the record, drone type spheres have been used by non-human parties in the past in so far as what I've been exposed to.
When I think of drone type spheres, I think of Skinwalker ranch and the spheres that killed the dogs on the ranch. Granted those spheres were the size of softballs, but if a softball sized sphere can melt a dog into a pile of grease then a ten foot sphere should be able to blow things up. Right?

¤=[Post Update]=¤


Video put out by Dante Santori claiming to know who did this with the reason being that it was not a communications satellite, but instead a "chemtrail activator" for a future "final solution".

I8IOM6Whelg


This Dante dude cares a little too much about presentation and playing songs during the tales he is telling.
Ruines any chance of me taking his messag for real.

[shadowstalker]

If it was non terrestrial, it would be an act taken only after full ethical evaluation, subject to rules we may not even be able to imagine.

I am sorry but i have to state this.
According to who???
As aliens are no different from humans you have you good guys and bad guys and so on.
And of-course the bad guys don't pay attention to ethics.

I truly don't know who or what did this, or the real reasons why at this point, but i do ask that any good remote viewers should take a look into this.

[Frankie Pancakes]

I'm no good at cut and paste so here is a link to a similar UFO explanation for this. You will have to scroll past the Hillary info "Do not underestimate the power of corruption" (which BTW is interesting) to get to the article.

http://82.221.129.208/basepagea8.html

I'm getting hungry. Think I'll order a digital dinner.

[ThePythonicCow]

I'm no good at cut and paste so here is a link (put it into the address bar) to a similar UFO explanation for this. You will have to scroll past the Hillary info (which BTW is interesting) to get to the article.

file:///home/jim/Pictures/kmaa5.html
That link is to a file on your own computer ... it is impossible for anyone, on any other computer, to see that file, using that link.

If you were hungry, and I offered you food, over the Internet, stating that "The food is right there, in the back right corner of the second shelf of the (my) refrigerator. Have some!" ... would that satisfy your hunger? Only if you happened to be where I am, and could also access my refrigerator, would my offer be useful.

[Baby Steps]

If it was non terrestrial, it would be an act taken only after full ethical evaluation, subject to rules we may not even be able to imagine.

I am sorry but i have to state this.
According to who???
As aliens are no different from humans you have you good guys and bad guys and so on.
And of-course the bad guys don't pay attention to ethics.

I truly don't know who or what did this, or the real reasons why at this point, but i do ask that any good remote viewers should take a look into this.


I am thinking that bad guys would not interfere with a dodgy action by our own ptb. That may be naive, as its not a good versus bad thing always, there are so many factions etc. the general view is however that the self serving types of et try to keep their presence as secret as possible, so I would suspect this was the benign guys behaving in accordance with their own ethics.

[Builder]

Israeli Weaponised Satellite??? Do you have any information about that? I thought the satellite was from Facebook.

[Andre]

I am not familiar with lenses, focus and recording devices, but is it not possible that this alleged UFO was just an insect or bird that passed the view of the camera at close range?

When i examined the first frames of the explosion, the flying object to the right appeared to have a very definite and clear spherical shape so I can't see how it would an insect. There are no wings evident on the sphere.

[ThePythonicCow]

Israeli Weaponised Satellite??? Do you have any information about that? I thought the satellite was from Facebook.

From Destroys Satellite for Facebook Project (Bloomberg) (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-01/spacex-falcon-9-rocket-explodes-on-launch-pad-at-cape-canaveral):



A SpaceX rocket blew up on a launchpad in Florida, marking the second loss of a spacecraft by Elon Musk’s venture in a little more than a year and hobbling a Facebook Inc. initiative to spread internet access across Africa.

The accident occurred Thursday at Cape Canaveral’s Launch Complex 40 as SpaceX held a dress rehearsal for Saturday’s planned launch of an Israeli communications satellite. Both the Falcon 9 rocket and its payload were incinerated as fireballs scorched the structure.
From Communication Satellite Lost in SpaceX Rocket Explosion Was Co-Leased by Facebook (Space.com) (http://www.space.com/33937-facebook-satellite-lost-in-spacex-rocket-explosion.html):



The launch of AMOS-6 was a collaboration between Facebook and French-based satellite provider Eutelsat Communications, and would have been part of Internet.org, a "Facebook-led initiative with the goal of bringing internet access and the benefits of connectivity to the two-thirds of the world that doesn't have them," according to the Internet.org website. Six other communications companies helped co-found the initiative.

"Over the last year Facebook has been exploring ways to use aircraft and satellites to beam internet access down into communities from the sky," Zuckerberg wrote in his AMOS-6 announcement. "To connect people living in remote regions, traditional connectivity infrastructure is often difficult and inefficient, so we need to invent new technologies."

Eutelsat reported that the satellite capacity was "optimised for community and Direct-to-User Internet access using affordable, off-the-shelf customer equipment."

The AMOS-6 satellite was owned by the Israeli-based satellite operator Space Communications (Spacecom) and was built in collaboration with Israeli Space Industries. The satellite was estimated to cost $195 million when the plan to build it was first announced.

Facebook and Eutelsat had a contract to lease the AMOS-6 satellite for $95 million over 5 years, according to SpaceNews. That article also reported that the contract required Spacecom to purchase an insurance policy "covering project-related risks that would not otherwise be covered by Spacecom's own insurance policy covering the satellite's launch and first year in orbit."

[Ewan]

The satellite was estimated to cost $195 million when the plan to build it was first announced.



That figure just popped out at me there, as I thought 'How Much!?'

How can something around the size of a car cost that much to make? Is it the size of a car, half that size, I don't know. I'm sure it has all the latest technology and components that cost a bomb, but still?

[MorningFox]

No offence intended but I'm not sure the size of something has any relevance at all to how much it costs to make...

[KiwiElf]

Nop, size has nothing to do with the cost... ;)

B2 Stealth Bomber (Batwing), Length 69 ft, Wingspan 172 ft. COST = US$2.3 Billion each

Lockheed Martin F-35C, Length 50.5 ft, Wingspan 35 ft. COST = US$337 - 618 million+ each
(the price keeps going up on this one; the entire F-35 program has so far cost US$1.5 Trillion+)

Queen Mary II, Length 1,132 ft, Beam 132 ft. COST = US$900 Million

[Carmody]

The satellite was estimated to cost $195 million when the plan to build it was first announced.



That figure just popped out at me there, as I thought 'How Much!?'

How can something around the size of a car cost that much to make? Is it the size of a car, half that size, I don't know. I'm sure it has all the latest technology and components that cost a bomb, but still?

Space is an exceedingly unfriendly place for high speed electronics. also, I've handled some of the components for such devices and they are hand built, one offs, one of a kind,and they have redundancy x3 even x4, as a minimum, depending on the criticality of the given aspect.

If it is to service an entire continent, a data deprived continent that is expanding, with modern technology behind that expansion.....then it is well overbuilt, way over the top -- in data handling capacity.

$195 million for such a satellite is not unusual.

And, to add, nor would it even be remotely implausible (ie, highly likely) that OTHER unstated and undocumented capacities are built into the given satellite.

My reason for posting in the thread is this: The UFO comment aspect has now reached even Elon Musk's twitter channel. (https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/774257337221517312)

[lucidity]

It seems that Elon Musk thinks it might have a UFO... that caused the Space X explosion.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/09/10/elon-musk-we-have-not-ruled-out-that-ufo-caused-space-x-explosion/

(but clearly.. they've got all the information and video capture they need...
... someone in that control room knows who or what was responsible for that explosion)

the full story is _sure_ to come out.
Keep your eyes on this one... details will start to leak out. I just know it.

[lucidity]

Interestingly... it seems that Kerry Cassidy was trying to warn Elon Musk about
something bad happening to Space X. This was based on some premonition
about Space X from a remote viewer: Dick Allgire.

http://projectcamelotportal.com/2016/09/01/my-space-x-elon-musk-warning-based-on-the-remote-viewing-by-dick-allgire/

[EFO]

En Francais,mais...
Do the math

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUaLqvdWVNA