PDA

View Full Version : I attended the architects and engineers 9/11 conference nyc



thepainterdoug
12th September 2016, 14:26
hey all. i met a researcher while there on the only day Saturday that I could attend, said hello but not much time to speak. so i wrote him today regarding his thoughts and wanted to share the letter with you all for anyone interested./

This is Doug Auld the artist that spoke to you over the weekend.
see the project i would like to include you in www.dougauld.com/whistleblowers

I wanted to know your take on the event over the weekend? I could only make the Saturday but imagine it was more of the same.

I am a big admirer of Danny Sheehan and all he presents and can listen to him for hours. . However there is a lot of conflict for me regarding the info presented. And it seems to me that there is their own narrative , and they want to stick with it.

I cannot discount the DR Judy Wood contribution who was missing from this discussion. The cars at great distances with the oddest burns and damages , melted engine blocks, missing door handles and just a wide range of things that are unrelated to a collapse. The unreported hurricane of the coast and so on. Does she not have a place in this discussion? Nor the V. Today Gordon camp regarding nukes. No mention?

I also don’t feel the plane theory works according to known physics. I don’t understand how a plane can enter the building like a knife through butter, wing tips, engines and so on then freeze frame inside the building and explode when completely inside. And no vortex trail from the wind following that can be seen in the smoke from the explosion.

How did these numbskull idiot “terrorists” learn to fly with marked precision that pilot John Lear among many pilots say, impossible. The air drag alone at sea level would stall break apart and or compromise these planes if real ,and yet nothing went wrong with their plan?

Same for the pentagon. Camon, no plane, no parts, no bodies, luggage and only after, the lawn somehow starts to be littered with debris. But the early scene shows a pristine lawn and a small hole. No plane.
Btw/ I was at the waters edge in Hoboken NJ right after the first “plane” hit. Then I looked south and noticed the second plane coming into view and remember clearly saying, ohh here comes a military plane to check out the seen. IT WAS DARK GRAY.

Well, you know all this, I’m just trying to figure for myself and out and ask your take. I’m not a researcher but I am a very awake person.

Lastly, that hall should have been packed if this message is truly hitting the mark after 15 years . But it isn’t, and it isn’t because the message is fractured and non inclusive and the camps are divided. Perhaps truth is not what they are after?

Where are the young people, the college students, the average joe on the street needs to have a reason to get involved. The Italian judge had important info but presented poorly at the wrong forum. No one could understand a thing he said. And the questions following to him were time mismanaged. This was boring as there were fifty questions not gotten to.
The panel should have had Gordon, You ,Jim F, Dr Wood, Morgan Renolyds Andrew Johnson ,Chris Bollyn and a host of others and so on. What about the Mossad? The Israelis, and so on.?

Is this about truth or controlling the narrative?

There are too many questions about thermite for me to accept this. And where is the rubble pile? How did fireman survive in stairwell b in a gravity collapse?

Lots don’t add up, and if they loose a person like me, they will be loosing a real foot soldier .

doug

Cidersomerset
12th September 2016, 14:50
Very good letter Doug.....I have a couple 9/11 related threads going on and in one I posted
I re watched a couple of Judy Woods vids. You cannot fault her logic imo which is as far as
I can go, as the technical side needs more practical knowledge in these subjects.

I also posted Joseph Farrell's trilogy of 9/11 related vids and of course he likes Judy's work
but also goes into the secret space programme and what exotic energy weapons that involves.
Judy does not speculate what may of caused the 'dustification' but knows the official and
thermite does not explain it . We all know that Saudi patsies did not pull this off , and to
cover their tracks and confuse JFK like researchers they made this like a Russian doll
layers within layers. The problem with this is that most researchers know if you start
talking about exotic weapons and possible space fleets ,they know the mainstream
will have a field day. Unless a significant 'whistleblower' or real undisputed proof can
be found. Still you never know , who thought the Soviet Union would collapse so quick ??



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

nice paintings.............

http://66.media.tumblr.com/7912e637075929091a9e690cbdd08d75/tumblr_muhlitHhGY1skn9vxo1_400.jpg
====================================================

http://67.media.tumblr.com/fcfd01c53f6efb7abfa9abc3e6bf32ed/tumblr_mugxsffhXf1skn9vxo1_1280.jpg
“first reponders” oil, a painting made in honor of Larry Holloway a 9/11 first
responder who went unrecognized and unsupported for his sacrifice .a print of this
image is available in his support. contact doug@dougauld.com

Jantje
12th September 2016, 14:57
It seems to be the case to me, that it was exotic technology not in the public domain that was used to carry out these attacks.
Architects and engineers are not gonna explain this using conventional technology as only source of inspiration. just my 2 cents

Fanna
12th September 2016, 15:35
Ya, funny, this happens to be the very same week that all of the millennials gather in a secret meeting to discuss our plans of world domination. Most of us were on this train by the time Bin Laden died.

Once the truth has been accepted, the healing has to occur. A lot harder than figuring out the truth.

Cidersomerset
12th September 2016, 16:07
Post from thread by WinstonSmith.....

Re: ZERO CHANCE WTC7 was brought down by fire
Attorneys Are Told: "Possibility of WTC 7 Collapsing Due to Fire is ZERO"

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?93291-ZERO-CHANCE-WTC7-was-brought-down-by-fire&p=1097951#post1097951

====================================================
==================================================

Attorneys Are Told: "Possibility of WTC 7 Collapsing Due to Fire is ZERO"

QxG4lYyitsI


Published on 11 Sep 2016


Explosions before the Collapse of WTC 7: https://youtu.be/qReJQCsIpKw
**************************************************************************
After a short introduction from Richard Gage AIA, founder of Architects and Engineers for
9/11 Truth, Forensic Structural Engineer Dr. Leroy Hulsey presents the findings and conclusion
of his WTC 7 Evaluation study to a panel of attorneys at the Justice in Focus 9/11 Symposium
in New York on Sep 11, 2016. Using finite element modelling, Dr. Hulsey and his team found
that the official explanation by NIST for the collapse of WTC 7, which is that ordinary office
fires brought the building down, is wrong.

After his presentation, when asked by Public Interest Attorney Daniel Sheehan, "On a scale of
1 to 100, what is the possibility that WTC 7 could have collapsed simply because of fires?" Dr.
Hulsey replied "Zero". He also said that if any of his Ph.D. students had submitted the explanation
for the collapse of WTC 7 that NIST gave us, he would have failed them.

The attorneys on the panel - who sat alongside guest panelists Daniel Sheehan, Barbara Honegger
and Judge Ferdinando Imposimato, the Honorary President of the Supreme Court of Italy - were
Mick Harrison, David Meiswinkle, Mustapha Ndanusa, Andrew Kreig and Bill Veale.

For more information about The Justice in Focus 9/11 Symposium:
http://911justiceinfocus.org

For more information about Dr. Leroy Hulsey's WTC Evaluation Study:
http://www.wtc7evaluation.org

thepainterdoug
12th September 2016, 17:19
yes this was good news. they are looking for legal ground to bring up a new case. so in all fairness to the organization, they need to keep on topic to what they can prove in court. this is not necessarily what the truth is, but what is legally actionable.
btw/ anything you can hear from Danny Sheehan including his gary null interviews, do listen !

ghostrider
13th September 2016, 01:21
Its all a roadmap for agenda of total control of every person on earth... the how and the who must take a backseat to the WHY ...The events of 911 led to -the creation of another HUGE government agency The dept of Homeland security...the other three should have been done away with, they were incompitent and of no use to protect Americans ...Next enter the patriot act, loss of freedoms for citizens who did nothing to warrant tyranny ... most of the highjackes were from Saudia Arabia, and we go to Afghanistan, then we invade Iraq ??? Next the drone program ramps up, and new technology of cloaked soldiers is leaked out ...then they saber rattle to march on SYRIA... NEVER looking at the Saudis ... who benefits most by a super power making war with muslims ??? Israel ... the goal - get rid of middlle east leaders, drive up oil prices, destabalize the arab nations, to set up one puppet to control it all and make war ith the infidels , so America can test technolog on live targets, while the public is on board from fear, never seeing the paper dollar is doomed and is the root of the hole thing ...