PDA

View Full Version : The Australian Emperor who has no clothes: Hutt River"s Prince Leonard 1



Justplain
27th September 2016, 23:13
I wonder if any of our Australian members have any opinions or fun facts about the principality of Hutt (any relation to Jabba?) River, ruled by one of Australia's first sovereign men, Prince Leonard 1.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Hutt_River

General Info:

The Principality of Hutt River was declared an independent province in 1970 by Leonard Casley, in response to a dispute with the government of Western Australia over what the Casley family considered draconian wheat production quotas. The Casley farm had around 4,000 hectares (9,900 acres) of wheat ready to harvest when the quotas were issued, which allowed Casley to sell only 1,647 bushels or approximately 40 hectares (99 acres). Initially, the five families who owned farms at Hutt River banded together to fight the quota, and Casley lodged a protest with the Governor of Western Australia, Sir Douglas Kendrew. The Governor replied "no rectification of our Quota would be allowed". Casley reasoned that as the Governor acts as the Queen's representative, this made Her Majesty liable, in tort, for applying an unlawful imposition as the quota had not yet been passed into law. Casley lodged a claim under the Law of Tort for A$52 million in the belief the claim would force a revision of the quota. Casley also resorted to the law of unjust enrichment and successfully seized government land surrounding his farm which he hoped would increase his quota. Two weeks later, the government introduced a bill into Parliament to "resume" their lands under compulsory acquisition. After approaches to the government to reconsider the acquisition bill failed, Casley and his associates resorted to International Law, which they felt allowed them to secede and declare their independence from the Commonwealth of Australia. Casley has said that he nonetheless remains loyal to Queen Elizabeth II.

Ellisa
28th September 2016, 01:38
It's considered as a joke! I think King Leonard died, or was that his wife (I think Queen Shirley). No-one got really angry with him- he issued his own stamps and made laws for his principality which everyone ignored. Now and then he would do something odd and be in the news for a day or two. It certainly led to no revolution as King Leonard always made sure everyone knew he was a loyal supporter of Queen Elizabeth (who is actually the Head of State of Australia, as Queen of Australia, and he only declared laws for his own property.

It has morphed into a bit of fun, and has actually done quite well as a tourist attraction. They like the stamps, currency, passports and visas etc (which are worthless off King Leonard's property). So he succeeded, but no-one else felt as he did--- well at least for as long as he did. He had fun with it. His children were declared to be Princes and Princesses and he gave out honours to people ! In short a great eccentric!

In fact I think it's sad and wrong about the quota. Farmers want to sell their produce--- though Leonard may not to have had such a problem in the 80s when the first of the huge droughts hit West Australia-- and also the rest of the country. We are only just really getting out of that dry cycle now.

amor
28th September 2016, 03:38
They said he could not sell his wheat. They did not say he could not sell his flour or the products made from it, all of which could have been sold as boxed goods! There are more ways to skin a cat than you can dream of.