PDA

View Full Version : (David Hodges, from 4 sources): NWO plan for EMP response to Trump



amor
28th September 2016, 03:21
https://youtu.be/C4qkwalMS1M

According to this Video, information obtained through confidential sources states that if TRUMP wins the election, the NWO plans to pull an EMP on this country, which would set off Fukushimas(?) times the number of working nuclear plants we have. They plan to set off germ warfare and stop food from getting to the people. Who are the NWO? The Bankers, in my opinion, who it is said have Russians and Chinese in Alaska awaiting the event to swoop in on US citizens. Elsewhere, it is said the Chinese soldiers are also in Mexico awaiting the signal. If that is not bad enough, the UN soldiers who are Russian and Polish, etc. are said to be in the country and are here to run the FEMA camps and are only awaiting the signal. In the video, it is stated that Obama is involved in getting the Russians and Chinese into Alaska. Would that not make him a traitor?

As an interesting aside, Alaska belonged to Czar Alexander III of Russia and ONLY LEASED IT TO THE USA, WHICH LEASE EXPIRED AROUND 1998. It legally belongs to the ROMANOV FAMILY, ALEXANDER III'S HEIRS, AND NOT TO RUSSIA. THAT FAMILY IS LIVING IN THE USA, ENGLAND AND EUROPE.

SHARE THIS

Bill Ryan
28th September 2016, 11:40
.
I just changed the title to more accurately reflect that maybe this isn't totally crazy. Such a thing may seem unlikely, and extreme by any definition, but it's not a zero possibility.

Dave Hodges (who is also extreme by any definition, but also sane and articulate, and arguably well-connected), here talks to Lisa Haven in what is a very easy interview to listen to.

He has 4 independent senior sources for this information, 3 reporting within 48 hours of each other, with a 90% overlap in detail. One of his sources, Hodges notes, has never yet been wrong.

The core warning seems to be that some of the US power grid could come down (not necessarily a totally catastrophic event), but enough to create a state of emergency -- and, just possibly, a crisis in some of the nuclear power stations, that need power to maintain their cooling: a real scenario that has been discussed many times by many well-informed people.

I'm not convinced a report like this can be dismissed. I've spent quite a few of the last several years gathering information about possible ways the cornered tiger of the elite controlling faction may push their big red button to create a great deal of chaos that would add needed new life to their agenda. So, I still listen to this kind of material. These threats have not gone away.

Summary of the warning: the widespread power outage would halt the election... and 'if they want WWIII out of it, they blame the damn Russians' (a quote from one of his sources).

The section of interest starts at 1:40, and continues to a short break at 18:00. (That's the key part, although the conversation does continue after that.) I'm not endorsing this information, but I'd suggest it is worth listening to for 15 mins or so.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4qkwalMS1M

Bill Ryan
28th September 2016, 11:57
.
A little more, just as an additional summary comment. This is what I wrote to the mods just now:





I was kind of rolling my eyes at this new thread -- and then started to pay attention as I listened to the video. I 'moderated' the OP with a slightly more balanced (maybe!) post of my own that followed, and also tweaked the title. The interview is worth listening to for a few minutes.

I've always noted what Dave Hodges says: much of the problem with warnings of dire events from him, Steve Quayle, Alex Jones and others is that it's a Wolf, Wolf thing. We all become blasé and numbed because nothing really terrible ever seems to happen. That may all be part of the plan... to create disillusionment and conflict in the alternative media, and then hit everyone with a sucker punch when everyone's asleep again.

Rex
28th September 2016, 15:53
There are quite a number of top republicans that are going to vote for Hillary. This shows the divisiveness caused by the Trump candidacy. I know this is a little weak to be considered on topic, but imho it adds some weight to the possibility of something happening to Trump or the US (or both) if he gets elected. This behavior seems unprecedented to me. One of them, not confirmed, is George HW Bush:

Michael Bloomberg
Meg Whitman
Richard Armitage
Richard Hanna
Tony Fratta
Christine Todd Whitman
Scott Evertz
Frank Lavin
David Neirenberg
Chris Shays
Rosario Marin
William Ruckelhaus
Mark Salter
Craig Snyder
Larry Pressler
Lezlee Westine
William Reilly
Harry Sloan
Brent Scowcroft
Kori Schake
Mike Fernandez
Carla A. Hills
Henry Paulson
Robert Kagan
Hamid Moghadam
Connie Morella
Robert Blackwill
Chuck Robbins
Doug Elmets
William Milliken
Marc Andreesen

Source: http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Top-Republicans-voting-Hillary-Clinton-Trump-9284182.php