PDA

View Full Version : First Texas, now Virginia – UN Troops seen mobilizing across America… is it happening?



thunder24
30th September 2016, 17:17
http://viralliberty.com/breaking-first-texas-now-virginia-un-troops-mobilizing-across-america-happening/


ELDER PATRIOT – Last September Joe Biden and Loretta Lynch announced that the Obama administration would be “working” with the United Nations to form a global law enforcement agency that would have policing authority inside of the United States.

Two years earlier the Obama administration signed the United Nations Small Arms Treaty in an attempt to “backdoor” the nullification of the Second Amendment.

The mainstream media ignored the unconstitutional aspect of these Obama actions choosing to ignore almost all of both stories while providing only a highly biased limited slice of coverage to the small arms treaty. When others in the alternative media covered Obama’s illegal overreach of American law they were labeled as conspiracy theorists and their reports were dismissed as untruthful or unnecessary scaremonering.

But nowhere does the Constitution give the president authority to quarter foreign troops on U.S. soil. If anything, the presence of foreign military personnel within our borders qualifies as an act of war requiring the president to be responsible for their immediate removal.

Still, with the aid of a compliant Republican legislature, Obama went ahead with plans for a pact with the U.N. calling it the Strong Cities Network.

Fast-forward nine months and this was the scene on US Interstate 81 in Virginia last Friday:

http://patriotcrier.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/UN-vehicle-1.jpg


I don't really know what to say about this....

Daozen
30th September 2016, 17:32
This article is fairly old, came out in June this year.

Tineye reverse image search shows these photos have been around since June. No doubt the White House is underhanded, but conspiracy sites have been saying "It's happening" for at least 15 years.

https://www.tineye.com/search/9d8065570a8a8b1549c51a7ba5237b0364c985e4/?page=1&sort=crawl_date&order=asc

thunder24
30th September 2016, 18:13
thanks for that daozen guess its a bit of sensationalism... my apologies still find it funny more people interested in this then clean drinking water... :o

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?93274-Dakota-Pipeline-Protests...Who-s-gonna-participate

TargeT
30th September 2016, 18:13
we ARE the UN... it was started here in California.. (http://www.un.org/en/sections/history/history-united-nations/) That's how we get away with ignoring all their rules and rulings :ROFL:

joeecho
30th September 2016, 19:16
UN

Un- 'not'

'Not" what many of the populous think it is?

http://allnewspipeline.com/images/islam-diversity-greyenigma.png

wondering
30th September 2016, 22:53
What point are you making with the pic and how does it relate to the UN? Just wondering!

A Voice from the Mountains
1st October 2016, 02:02
The UN is globalist. The globalists want to erase national sovereignty and rule countries via an international/global government (like the UN). One of the techniques for destroying national sovereignty is by running a country over with immigrants from other cultures who do not share the traditional values of that country and will eventually vote to destroy them.

See California for an example. Illegal Mexican immigrants can vote in elections there.

Also see Germany for another example of the great accomplishments of globalism and its immigration agendas.

Inversion
1st October 2016, 03:44
This video posted on the 28th of September on DAHBOO77. The Google image is dated 2016.

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.6433113,-77.7880927,252m/data=!3m1!1e3

A big shout out to Travis B, The person that took the images!
As you can see in the photos, there is a bunch of UN Equipment being staged at this Kellog's Factory In Williamsport, MD. There is not only armored vehicles, but there are containers and fuel tankers marked with UN as well. This goes along with other activity we have seen recently across the country.
If you have any info you want me to break and get out, let me know at dahboo7@yahoo.com.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QHopVtF_B-U

Althena
1st October 2016, 17:57
They're getting ready for when the shtf after the elections if Trump wins, buckle up folks...

TargeT
1st October 2016, 17:59
They're getting ready for when the shtf after the elections if Trump wins, buckle up folks...

why if trump wins?

Satori
1st October 2016, 18:13
The S[may]HTF if Killary wins. It depends on whether enough Americans have the courage to call them on their [s]election theft. Truth be told, as it is not in the MSM, Trump has a commanding lead in the popular vote. He would win a fair and honest election. If/when we are told the criminal Clinton "won" it will be more than interesting to see what transpires thereafter. In my view, if the UN is ramping up its presence in the USA it's for a what they expect will happen when the selection is thrown to another member of the Bush/Clinton et al. crime family.

Althena
1st October 2016, 18:15
They're getting ready for when the shtf after the elections if Trump wins, buckle up folks...

why if trump wins?

A lot of people will be really upset and take to the streets I think, mostly the colored folk and mexicans, I see riots and looting in the near future.
MY PERSONAL OPINION.

Let's hope I'm wrong.

Althena
1st October 2016, 18:26
The S[may]HTF if Killary wins. It depends on whether enough Americans have the courage to call them on their [s]election theft. Truth be told, as it is not in the MSM, Trump has a commanding lead in the popular vote. He would win a fair and honest election. If/when we are told the criminal Clinton "won" it will be more than interesting to see what transpires thereafter. In my view, if the UN is ramping up its presence in the USA it's for a what they expect will happen when the selection is grown to another member of the Bush/Clinton et al. crime family.

Do you think the powers that be will allow Trump to win? Doubtful. The selection really is rigged.

wnlight
1st October 2016, 18:37
UN means ONE where I live. It stands for one world government.

bluestflame
1st October 2016, 18:53
i think there has been enough calculated polarisation to ensure the stuff will hit the fan EITHER WAY , that's the real agenda behind the current election campaign ,

UN , " what is yet is not " i read some line in prophecy about that

Althena
1st October 2016, 19:05
The S[may]HTF if Killary wins. It depends on whether enough Americans have the courage to call them on their [s]election theft. Truth be told, as it is not in the MSM, Trump has a commanding lead in the popular vote. He would win a fair and honest election. If/when we are told the criminal Clinton "won" it will be more than interesting to see what transpires thereafter. In my view, if the UN is ramping up its presence in the USA it's for a what they expect will happen when the selection is grown to another member of the Bush/Clinton et al. crime family.

Do you think the powers that be will allow Trump to win? Doubtful. The selection really is rigged.

There's a Nostradamus prophecy about the one who's elected but never gets to reign. Trump?

C8:Q20

The false message about the rigged election
to run through the city stopping the broken pact;
voices bought, chapel stained with blood,
the empire contracted to another one.

A Voice from the Mountains
2nd October 2016, 02:24
C8:Q20

The false message about the rigged election
to run through the city stopping the broken pact;
voices bought, chapel stained with blood,
the empire contracted to another one.

Nostradamus writing about a "rigged election" in the 1500's? Sounds like pretty anachronistic terminology to me. I would love to see the original French/Latin.

For the record, I haven't checked this verse in particular, but there are fake Nostradamus predictions floating around. Quotes in general are some of the most erroneous things going around on the Internet.

That's why my favorite quote is by Abraham Lincoln, when he said, "Don't believe everything you read on the Internet."

Althena
2nd October 2016, 12:27
C8:Q20

The false message about the rigged election
to run through the city stopping the broken pact;
voices bought, chapel stained with blood,
the empire contracted to another one.

Nostradamus writing about a "rigged election" in the 1500's? Sounds like pretty anachronistic terminology to me. I would love to see the original French/Latin.

For the record, I haven't checked this verse in particular, but there are fake Nostradamus predictions floating around. Quotes in general are some of the most erroneous things going around on the Internet.

That's why my favorite quote is by Abraham Lincoln, when he said, "Don't believe everything you read on the Internet."

Here you go:

C8 Q20
Original Verse in English plus French (Benoit Ed.)

The false message about the rigged election
to run through the city stopping the broken pact;
voices bought, chapel stained with blood,
the empire contracted to another one.

Le faux me$$aige par election fainte
Courir par vrben rompu pache arre$te
Voix acheptees de $ang chappelle tainte
Et a vn autre l'empire contraicte,

Sueanne47
2nd October 2016, 16:32
Here is a video about the UN takeover of the US ~ they are using food as a weapon.

mW3s0ggu-wE

Here's a link for food you'll need to last you for a while....God Bless.

http://foodforliberty.com/leahz

A Voice from the Mountains
3rd October 2016, 06:25
Here you go:

C8 Q20
Original Verse in English plus French (Benoit Ed.)

The false message about the rigged election
to run through the city stopping the broken pact;
voices bought, chapel stained with blood,
the empire contracted to another one.

Le faux me$$aige par election fainte
Courir par vrben rompu pache arre$te
Voix acheptees de $ang chappelle tainte
Et a vn autre l'empire contraicte,

Yes, so the English translation is poor and misleading. The word "rigged" is an anachronism with modern connotations used without any justification. The word "fainte" in French (an archaic spelling of "feinte") means "fake" or "mocked." The only reason to translate it as "rigged" is to make it fit in with modern verbage and look more like it's speaking to right now.

The third line looks to me more like this: "Voices purchased of (ie with) blood chapel color(ed)."

There is a problem because whoever made the website you're copying and pasting from didn't include the accents over the letters, and those help determine grammatical function in French. With the word "acheptees," which is an archaic form of the word "achetées," I can still tell by the accent-less spelling that it's the plural feminine adjective describing the noun "voix." But with the word "tainte," it could be "tainté" and we wouldn't know it, and that actually makes a big difference grammatically. It's the difference of whether this is a noun ("color") or adjective ("colored") modifying the previous noun.

Whoever translated the passage above also totally ignored the word "de" which linked "voix acheptees" with the rest of the line, but instead they inserted a comma and imply that "voices bought" is separated from "blood chapel color(ed)" when in the French it's not.

bluestflame
3rd October 2016, 06:36
According to some, the death of one known as "Mabus" will herald some cataclysmic event. The actual mention of Mabus is restricted to C2, Q62 where we see Mabus described:

'Mabus' then will soon die, there will come
Of people and beasts a horrible rout:
Then suddenly one will see vengeance,
Hundred, hand, thirst, hunger when the comet will run.
So who is Mabus? Well nobody knows, but that hasn't stopped people guessing! As you might expect various Mabus candidates come and go. Once they've "gone" and nothing bad happens they pretty much rule themselves out of the running. So here are some of the candidates that have been suggested over the years.

http://www4.pictures.zimbio.com/gi/Hillary+Clinton+Ray+Mabus+War+Ship+Made+World+q2lLzowjiNrl.jpgIn This Photo: Hillary Clinton, Ray Mabus
(L-R) Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton is seated as secretary of the Navy, Ray Mabus addresses attendees during the commissioning of the USS New York on November 7, 2009 at Piers 86 and 88 in New York City. The ship was built with 7.5 tons of steel from the World Trade Center in its bow.

Sueanne47
4th October 2016, 15:43
Its not just UN vehicles in Texas:

yDrHUhOAAug

(pub. 2nd oct)

A Voice from the Mountains
4th October 2016, 21:16
Before people get too hyped up, the US military may very well be on the side of the American people. Our soldiers are drawn from among our friends and neighbors and I do not believe it would go over well with either them or their officers to be ordered to turn on the American people without good reason.

Also remember that Obama has been sacking scores, maybe even hundreds of high-ranking US military by this point. He probably isn't firing his good friends. He must be trying to suppress something in the military, like opposition to what he stands for, and this conflict extends over to Syria where the Pentagon (US military) and CIA-backed forces have been fighting each other directly in a proxy war.

There are globalist agendas going up against nationalist agendas all over the west right now, just as Britain rejected EU membership for national interests. I believe this is exactly what is going on in the US. Globalist interests are being rejected both popularly and by people within our government and military, in favor of a return to national interests. If we don't reject globalism then our country will be destroyed. If you wait until it's obvious then it will be too late. We are at an important turning point right now and our military knows it, and I feel much more comfortable with them than I do the Obama administration.

In other words I think a military coup against an Obama/Hitlery regime would be more likely than turning on the people themselves, though of course any strike against the fascist/communist Obama regime would probably cause rioting from the zombies anyway.

shaberon
4th October 2016, 22:17
The military is not *supposed* to be a national police force, and to have some Congressional checks on the President's "commander" status.

What kind of resources does the Executive have? FBI, CIA, Fema, Marshalls.

States have State Police and a governor-controlled section of the National Guard. So depending on who's on what side and who listens to whose orders, it could go different ways. Certainly, at least some amount of the military would be against domestic action.

A Voice from the Mountains
5th October 2016, 00:03
Our military is sworn to uphold the Constitution and defend it against "all enemies foreign and domestic." That's their ultimate oath and responsibility and a lot of soldiers and officers take that very seriously. I really think this is probably why Obama has been firing so many high-ranking officers. The same was also taking place under Bush if I remember correctly.

In the case of a military coup against the globalist regime, the National Guard in each state probably would play a large role. Hopefully it never comes to that. It's never had to before, but you never know.