Internet out of U.S. control Oct 1

[mojo]

Hardly a word was said?????? What will it mean?

xURIziY2vDA

[Sunny-side-up]

Intresting ti hear
Can this Globalist Nightmare be stoped

[Baby Steps]

So does this mean that a U.S. citizen exercising their free speech rights can be blocked by the Un because their control is legally beyond the reach of the constitution?

[LivioRazlo]

The United States military have failed to uphold the oaths they swore to protect by allowing these traitors to sell the 1st Amendment.

I, as a free citizen of the United States, will NEVER honor any agreements made with the UN or the antichrist in the Vatican - Pope Francis.

The Internet community has failed to voice their overwhelming support to stop this debacle.

Tyranny will now be ushered in to thunderous applause.

The war on Christianity will now commence.

God be with each and every one of you.

I will NEVER think twice about what I say or post here at Avalon, Facebook or Twitter. In fact, I will double down my efforts and pray to become a martyr, honoring God before any totalitarian government.

[genevieve]

Stefan Molyneux talks about the handoff to the UN.

This is what he said when urging people to take action to prevent it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-xu5p_nDcrg (22 mins.)

This is what he said a few hours before the October 1 deadline:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwRA-zAbx1k (10 mins.)


Peace Love Joy & Harmony,
genevieve

[Sueanne47]

I will NEVER think twice about what I say or post here at Avalon, Facebook or Twitter. In fact, I will double down my efforts and pray to become a martyr, honoring God before any totalitarian government.

How can we stop this madness..

34299

[Althena]

https://grrrgraphics.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/obama_internet_cartoon_ben_garrison.jpg?w=640&h=469

[OMG]

So does this mean that a U.S. citizen exercising their free speech rights can be blocked by the Un because their control is legally beyond the reach of the constitution?

YUP...and soon...

This is such a terrible thing no one can even grasp its ramifications..

Along with about every other nightmare you can possibly imagine regarding the internet, the UN, transhumanism and the GLOBOLIST agenda...unless they are stopped!

p.s. And Obumber is setting his sights on the position of UN secretary and beyond...the end is nigh...

:flame:

[bluestflame]

handing ANYTHING over to UN control not a good thing

[OMG]

What amazes me is the complete utter silence over it along with virtually no congressional input, etc...

We are sooooo screwed IF there is no divine intervention soon. No human forces on their own can stop these cabal...only in unity (critical mass) could we stand a chance but that's highly unlikely. The cabal let's us have just enough so we're constantly distracted and we won't revolt until it's utterly too late.

If there is no divine and alien based Alliance to counter and destroy the cabal then what chance do we have?

Look at our history...none of the people on here or those they know can do anything significant IN TIME that I'm aware. Same goes for all forums and movements for positive change. Wish it was otherwise but who can prove that it is?

[Michelle Marie]

Free Speech is one of those "certain unalienable rights" and we have free will choice.

We cannot be duped unless we allow it...

Does the U.N. Have power over us? No. Not unless we comply through buying into it. Awakened ones are leading the way to solutions...creating something new and better.

Those who try to control others in a free will universe must first deceive themselves. Those with ill-intent will create their own demise.

There are ingenious solutions to everything, and as necessity is the mother of invention, the solutions will emerge and we will rise victorious. Stay in love and out of fear and create miracles whenever necessary!

We can stay attuned to Divine wisdom as we are coordinated to evolve through these times.

Watch for miracles and victories.
A saying of one of my friends is that you will find what you are looking for.
I'll add, you will reap what you sow in your imagination.

I'm holding the highest vision.

Love all ways,
MM

[ghostrider]

The order of the day for earth human beings is simply one word-CONTROL ... The battle for freedom has begun ... Always use your own mind, own thinking , own words, own free will, own ideas , remain a sovereign individual, standing for freedom, freedom for all of humanity...

[ZooLife]

When at entity hands over it's power to another it is creating a scapegoat when really it was an illusion that power was transferred.

When a protest erupts over an aspect of the internet the government of a country will, in effect, say that it was not their fault......they were just following a directive of the UN counsel.

When people have done horrible things under the guise of war. You can bet that the bulk of them under prosecution will say they were just "following orders" and they are not to blame.

I swear, governments treat their citizens like children fully expecting to easily hoodwink them.

[ThePythonicCow]

I think that this "US hands over the Internet to the UN" meme is being over played.

The ICANN corporation, which handles some of the DNS name spaces, such as under .com and .net, goes from working for a US government contract, to working for some UN organization.

ICANN does not control content on the Internet. They do not control much at all, actually. The past, present, and future abuses of the Internet that threaten our freedom arise from other places, by other means, more useful to controlling and surveilling the Internet.

[Sueanne47]

This Canadian lady talks about the increasing censorship on youtube:

v00lSTCUcz4

[joeecho]

This Canadian lady talks about the increasing censorship on youtube:

v00lSTCUcz4

Thanks for posting this video, Sueanne47.

Regardless if this video addresses the OP, this video does address what a number of people are sensing on many places across the 'net. It's an interesting video for those of us that have not personally pushed YouTube's ever evolving boundaries.

Once one pushes up against the boundaries of 'free speech' one quickly, or at least eventually, realize there is no such thing. I would venture to say that those that have power over these boundaries would prefer we censor ourselves then the use of force. The use of force requires a revealing, at least in part, of the hidden hand.

Could video's like this be the proverbial canary in a coal mine?

[Cardillac]

Hi all,

this is all according to written reports about the US giving up the internet to the UN -

I don't know whether anyone else has experienced any difficulties so far but when I try to access previous links (like Jordan Maxwell on AmericanFreedomRadio.com) they are no longer available after Aug./Sept.; has anyone else experienced this on any level?-

please inform-

Larry

[Bill Ryan]

when I try to access previous links (like Jordan Maxwell on AmericanFreedomRadio.com) they are no longer available after Aug./Sept.; has anyone else experienced this on any level?-


Hi there, Larry: :waving:

I can see this page...
http://americanfreedomradio.com/Jordan_Maxwell_16.html

Was this what you couldn't seem to find?

[Cardillac]

@Bill

Hi Bill,

I just simply don't know; there's a lot of censorship going on here in Germany now (what, just NOW?!)-

I will definetely check out your provided link but I find it rather strange that when goes to the original source it seems to be blocked here in Germany- I have no explaination for this; it's a dilemma; yes, I'm computer "stoopid" but THAT stupid I am not- or it may have to do with my slow computer connection (I live in a village, not in a metropole)

please stay well Bill and all readers-

Larry :-)

[Sunny-side-up]

Make copies of what you think to be important while you can just incase.
Nothing wrong with a personal collection :)

[betoobig]

Free Speech is one of those "certain unalienable rights" and we have free will choice.

We cannot be duped unless we allow it...

Does the U.N. Have power over us? No. Not unless we comply through buying into it. Awakened ones are leading the way to solutions...creating something new and better.

Those who try to control others in a free will universe must first deceive themselves. Those with ill-intent will create their own demise.

There are ingenious solutions to everything, and as necessity is the mother of invention, the solutions will emerge and we will rise victorious. Stay in love and out of fear and create miracles whenever necessary!

We can stay attuned to Divine wisdom as we are coordinated to evolve through these times.

Watch for miracles and victories.
A saying of one of my friends is that you will find what you are looking for.
I'll add, you will reap what you sow in your imagination.

I'm holding the highest vision.

Love all ways,
MM
:thumbsup::bowing::sun::heart::blackwidow::clapping::inlove::flower::wizard:
much love

[gord]

I've been doing this for 20 years already.


Make copies of what you think to be important while you can just incase.
Nothing wrong with a personal collection :)

[ThePythonicCow]

I think that this "US hands over the Internet to the UN" meme is being over played.
James Corbett of the Corbett Report (https://www.corbettreport.com), and James Evan Pilato of MediaMonarchy.com (http://mediamonarchy.com), on their weekly podcast New World Next Week, agree with me.

Listen to the second of the three reports, between 5:11 and 11:05, in their report from a month ago, of 1 Sept 2016, in this video:
bkMVNq36oQs
James Evan Pilato makes the point that it's not "The Internet" that's being transferred, but just control over one piece of its infrastructure, the top level of and some key domains within, the DNS Domain Name System that maps website names to numeric IP addresses.

James Corbett makes the point that our real concern should not be where central control lies (the U.S. or the U.N. ... neither is trustworthy), but eliminating such points of central control as is already being done in the .bit top level domain, which uses blockchain technology instead of a central database to administer its domain name space. (I will confess to being less enthusiastic about .bit than Corbett is, however.)

[Atlas]

Who controls the Internet? Ask the 4.4 billion people around the world who still don’t have Internet.

Here’s where they live (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/10/02/4-4-billion-people-around-the-world-still-dont-have-internet-heres-where-they-live/):
https://img.washingtonpost.com/wp-apps/imrs.php?src=https://img.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/files/2014/10/Offline1.png&w=800

[ghostrider]

The UN could decide forums like this are dangerous and cyber warfare could be used against us ...

[Bob]

I think that this "US hands over the Internet to the UN" meme is being over played.
James Corbett of the Corbett Report (https://www.corbettreport.com), and James Evan Pilato of MediaMonarchy.com (http://mediamonarchy.com), on their weekly podcast New World Next Week, agree with me.

Listen to the second of the three reports, between 5:11 and 11:05, in their report from a month ago, of 1 Sept 2016, in this video:
bkMVNq36oQs
James Evan Pilato makes the point that it's not "The Internet" that's being transferred, but just control over one piece of its infrastructure, the top level of and some key domains within, the DNS Domain Name System that maps website names to numeric IP addresses.

James Corbett makes the point that our real concern should not be where central control lies (the U.S. or the U.N. ... neither is trustworthy), but eliminating such points of central control as is already being done in the .bit top level domain, which uses blockchain technology instead of a central database to administer its domain name space. (I will confess to being less enthusiastic about .bit than Corbett is, however.)

Good chuckle on this one, how many people understand that DNS (domain name servers) is what directs one to a particular webpage.. Control the DNS and what pages come up, either real or bogus (or other pages apparently appearing to be where one wanted to get to) are not guaranteed to be real.

:facepalm:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/contract-expiration-to-end-us-authority-over-internet-ip-addresses/2016/09/30/4610adbb-c039-4b92-8637-ebd15874cf12_story.html


The Internet, as technical experts have pointed out, is not owned by the United States and can’t be given away. Yet the symbolism of the moment is powerful. The network began as a Pentagon program during the Cold War, just months after the first moon landing in 1969. The United States is now retreating at a time when concerns over online crime and cyberwarfare are growing, and critics worry that rival nations such as China and Russia are posing a greater online threat to American national security interests.

ICANN’s executives and board of directors, who oversee the organization day to day, will now report to what the group calls the Internet’s “stakeholder community” — a lightly defined mix of corporate interests, government officials, activists and experts spread across four international bodies.

and


Forty-seven years of U.S. government authority over the Internet’s most basic functions is slated to end Saturday, not with a celebration or a wake but with the quiet expiration of a contract.

The agreement essentially gives a California-based nonprofit group the sole authority to organize cyberspace’s address book.

And though this entity, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), has played this vital role for years, the retreat of U.S. control has sparked charges that the Obama administration is abandoning the final vestiges of a crucial — if rarely exercised — oversight position.

so keeping the records of assignments, ICANN will be running the paperwork.

[JoePiscapo]

Donald trump!

[Baby Steps]

The UN could decide forums like this are dangerous and cyber warfare could be used against us ...

I could not open PA in Addis Ababba, it said it was an unapproved or dangerous site. There was not an 'open anyway' option

[Bob]

I wonder if your DNS ( the server that changes the name of a website, into an address ) is creating the block.

[TargeT]

I wonder if your DNS ( the server that changes the name of a website, into an address ) is creating the block.

that's generally how those blocks are done, they re-direct "black listed" domains or sites to a page with what ever message they want on it.

UNLESS you are behind a fire wall, then it's the fire wall that's doing it (I know china and a few other countries have "country" firewalls) that everything goes through. A screen shot of the blocked message could make it fairly easy to tell.

[Maia Gabrial]

The UN is a nest of vipers that can't be trusted. I won't honor any agreements made with them either....In fact, why bother honoring the USG for betraying Americans this way? Their crimes are mounting up, folks.
And they won't be able to talk their way out of it when justice catches up to them....

[Maia Gabrial]

James Evan Pilato makes the point that it's not "The Internet" that's being transferred, but just control over one piece of its infrastructure, the top level of and some key domains within, the DNS Domain Name System that maps website names to numeric IP addresses.

James Corbett makes the point that our real concern should not be where central control lies (the U.S. or the U.N. ... neither is trustworthy), but eliminating such points of central control as is already being done in the .bit top level domain, which uses blockchain technology instead of a central database to administer its domain name space. (I will confess to being less enthusiastic about .bit than Corbett is, however.)

Isn't this how it all starts? Piece by piece so it's not so obvious? Bit by bit, so no one notices until it's too late? Haven't we seen this being done already with our rights?

When it comes to the UN, that nest of vipers, I have no confidence in them whatsoever.... There needs to be a complete overhaul of them and then moved somewhere else, not living high off of our taxes while we don't....

[ThePythonicCow]

When it comes to the UN, that nest of vipers, I have no confidence in them whatsoever....
Neither do I have any confidence in them ... about the only nest of vipers I trust less is down the coastline a little bit, in the District of Columbia :).

[TargeT]

Pretty much entirely about this situation, from a china based perspective.

iNZlOl-hI-M

[ThePythonicCow]

Pretty much entirely about this situation, from a china based perspective.
Well ... from a "China is the bad guy" perspective :).

I agree with the video that the Elite Bastards and their agents, apparently China in this case, will seek out and likely acquire substantial control over the Internet in the West, just as they have already done in China, and just as those same Elite Bastards and their agents have sought out and acquired control of so many other major parts of human civilization.

The more complicated and obfuscated the technology gets, beneath the covers, the more difficult it becomes for ordinary people to defend their freedom.

The recent ICANN move, itself, may be but a small part of this multi-decade effort. The finger pointing at China may be "limited hangout", that is done to turn this ongoing struggle to enslave humanity, six ways from Sunday (the Church handles the 7th day) into another "good guys" vs "bad guys" drama. The struggle to bottle up humanity's freedom is ongoing and long standing.