UFO Destroys Chemtrail, Alien Technology? UFOs protecting Earth? Sept 2016

[ExomatrixTV]

~if true ... this would or could be a game-changer in chemtrail-activism vs nwo agenda! fIMy5Q0BXEE

quote uploader:

"09/28/16 - 19:41 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fIMy5Q0BXEE&feature=youtu.be#) I caught an extraordinary UFO sighting. I was watching an odd looking light crossing the sky at variable speeds around my house, during the sunset. To me it was just some sort of helicopter, or maybe a drone. But after 5 or 10 minutes, I began suspecting the object not to be man-made. It was performing weird maneuvers, accelerating and decelerating randomly. When the light started to accelerate towards a huge Chemtrail, I took my camcorder and tried to find it in the distance.

The object stopped in front of the Chemtrail, and slowly destroyed it. Indeed, the trail was being "consumed" progressively. I was simply speechless. I still can't believe what I caught. The Chemtrail got literally perforated! I can't be 100% sure it's due to the object itself, but I'm sure there's a link between it and the Chemtrail. Such a huge trail can't just disappear like that, for no reason! And only a small portion of the trail gets erased, justly around the object!

After the UFO attacked the trail, it moved backwards and flied West, in my opposite direction. It disappeared pretty quickly.

Sorry for zooming out a little bit too early, my camcorder screen is really small, and doesn't have that much pixels... The object got so far away at the end, I simply thought it was not there anymore.

What was that object? Man-made prototype to delete Chemtrails? Some extra-terrestrial technology made to protect us? (maybe a bit far-fetched, but seriously, have you ever seen that before?) I just don't have a clue of what this is.

Feel free to tell me your opinion in the comments below. :)

► Camera settings:

ISO: Auto
Shutter speed: Auto
Aperture: Auto
WB: Auto
Filmed with ➫ Canon M52

Type ➫ Light interacting with its environment
Scale ➫ Unknown
Duration ➫ ~ 45 seconds
Color(s) ➫ White
Light(s) ➫ Yes
Speed ➫ Variable"


Filmed near Paris, France, 28-09-2016.

unquote!

[Cidersomerset]

What I like is aprox 1.11 mins in you see a plane with a normal contrail
fly past the chemtrails .....Regarding the UFO as always we need more
info , if it is genuine ? Is it destroying a chemtrail , if so it is not that
efficient by the looks of it . Or is it having an effect on the bit it is in
the vicinity of ?.....Always more questions than answers , but if genuine
a very interesting vid.....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

https://1.bp.blogspot.com/-0EaiPfKMsDE/V_H3ehSTs4I/AAAAAAAAQeY/veUA5wy8ae8obEGF52CaJXcRFxQNRWTPwCLcB/s640/ufo%2Bchemtrail.jpg

http://www.starseeds.net/forum/topics/amazing-ufo-destroys-chemtrail-alien-technology-ufos-protecting

http://www.ufosightingsdaily.com/2016/10/amazing-ufo-destroys-chemtrail-alien.html

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/fIMy5Q0BXEE/maxresdefault.jpg

[Axman]

I need one of those around my house nice catch my friend.


The Axman

[mojo]

amazing capture and hope others watch...

[CurEus]

Perhaps some friendly types are testing some remedies and solutions! :)

[OMG]

If this is real and that light ship or UFO is actually dissolving or getting rid of part of a chemtrail then that's fantastic!

But it also me makes me wonder...

For example, if a low technology plane can deliver a very long stream of chemtrail then why is a UFO only able to get rid of a very small section? What's going on here?

[matissathepissa]

That's awesome. As soon as I saw the Chemtrails start to disappear i said Thank you thank you. I don't believe it that is man-made because regular people the masses of people aren't allowed to put stuff in the sky like that especially to eat chemtrails. My gut tells me and always has that chemtrails population control. They want us to be sick and want us to be controlled and they want less of us in order to do that. Humans are meant to be free is so many laws and taxes and government. Sorry for my small rant here but it makes me so angry that we are not free as this life was intended to be here on Earth and not other humans wold poison us. If on the other hand they're not poisoning us and they're manipulating the weather somehow hide something we have a right to know what the hell that is. Freedom and Truth

[TelosianEmbrace]

I would like to believe that our group awareness of chemtrails has reached such a level that now allows the benevolent ET's to act on our behalf.

[Nick Matkin]

If you look very carefully at how the vapour/chem trail dissolves...

[Cardillac]

"stoopid" question: why would benevolent aliens choose to only disolve one chemtrail and not all of them?

[Cidersomerset]

"stoopid" question: why would benevolent aliens choose to only disolve one chemtrail and not all of them?



That's what I was referring to , if the footage is genuine and not doctored or CGI ?
It would be an excellent UFO sighting in itself. It looks to me that the trail was
dispersed local to it by whatever field , is created by the object as is stated by
many ufologists.

Another alternative is it is a demonstration of some kind, say " hi we can clear this
up if we want ". Now that brings in a whole load of other questions who ? why ? where ?
etc and seems an odd thing to do even if the message is not for us , but the TPTB.

If real it is probably just coincidence as there are so many trails but who knows.....:ufo:


===================================================

Years ago we had the odd bit of footage , now there are hundreds of them
but what is real is more of a problem than ever it seems.


t6dmvsRzPD0


b6r6jdG-5kQ

[Althena]

"stoopid" question: why would benevolent aliens choose to only disolve one chemtrail and not all of them?

That thing what ever it is, man made or otherwise is obviously taking "small" samples.

[Michelle Marie]

Perhaps some friendly types are testing some remedies and solutions! :)

That was my intuitive sense of it...

Great news!

Love,
MM

[Ewan]

If you look very carefully at how the vapour/chem trail dissolves...

Please continue...

I was watching and I knew that could be done in PhotoShop. I don't know that it was. I guess we'd need to find out more about the uploader?

[Nick Matkin]

If you look very carefully at how the vapour/chem trail dissolves...

Please continue...

I was watching and I knew that could be done in Photo Shop. I don't know that it was. I guess we'd need to find out more about the uploader?

I'm no video-effects expert, and neither do I know if it was done in PhotoShop or similar, but the vapour did seem to disappear in small 'chunks' when examined closely.

Looks to me like someone might be 'avvin a laff posting this sort of stuff, knowing it'll have a receptive audience and revelling in watching references to it multiply through the internet!

Sometimes I think we underestimate the mischief and nefarious pleasure hoaxers get out of watching people get taken in by their activities. For example, if anyone looks back to this forum thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?66161-Link-to-best-UK-evidence-case-account-closed-), it can be seen how gullible people are. Even by his own admission Ken Parsons (founder and chairman of BEAMS (http://www.beamsinvestigations.org/about.html)) was taken in by the hoax - a rather crude one by all accounts.

Then there were 105 forum posts about all that fake snow nonsense in Feb 2014.

Not everything that doesn't make sense is hoaxed. Just much of it!

[Cidersomerset]

Sometimes I think we underestimate the mischief and nefarious pleasure hoaxers
get out of watching people get taken in by their activities.

That's a major problem , we did have the odd member who could distinguish
some of them and I think they got a bit fed up with some of the posts.

[Cidersomerset]

A couple articles I found on the BBC from a couple years ago I just posted
on the main chemtrail thread.....
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?74872-Undeniable-Footage-Of-Jet-Aircraft-Spraying-The-Midwest-Respiratory-Crisis----Infected-Chemtrail-Beta-Test&p=1104271&viewfull=1#post1104271

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For anyone who does not think geo - engineering exits , here's an article
from the BBC web pages showing some of the methods proposed , and have
already and still being used in many researchers and whistle blowers opinions.....

No 2 atmospheric aerosols ......uhm ! Chemtrails any one ?

http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/3.20.5/orb/4/img/bbc-blocks-dark.png


Tackling climate change with technology

Scientists have been looking for ways of modifying the Earth's environment to
control global warming - it's known as geo-engineering.One way to do this is simply
to reflect more of the sun's light, changing the Earth's reflectivity, or albedo.
This could be attempted using vast, flexible space reflectors (1) placed in orbit
around the Earth. Alternatively, various types of "stratospheric aerosols" could be
released in the upper atmosphere (2) to scatter some light back out into space.
Earth-bound reflectors (3) could do the same.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/09/climate_change_geo/img/temperat_mit_inf466.gif

carbon image
Another approach is to directly reduce the atmospheric carbon that, among other
things, leads to temperature rises. This could be done by "fertilising" the ocean ,
stimulating the uptake of carbon by surface algae that would eventually sink to the
ocean floor. Exposing the surfaces of carbonate and silicate rocks in "enhanced
weathering" could provide a place for carbon to be absorbed.

Another frequently mentioned proposal is the capture of carbon dioxide from the air
using "artificial trees", followed by liquefaction and storage, probably in
underground reservoirs.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/09/climate_change_geo/img/carbon_mit_inf466.gif

geo engineer image
There is no single geo-engineering "silver bullet" that should be pursued as an all-
encompassing solution to climate change, says the UK's Royal Society in its
analysis of the cost of a range of proposals compared with their efficacy.
Stratospheric aerosols seem to offer the most effect for the least investment, and
could be deployed soon, but present an unknown risk to the environment.
Changes to desert surface albedo are projected to be more effective than ocean
fertilisation, but both could change delicate ecosystems in unexpected ways.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/spl/hi/sci_nat/09/climate_change_geo/img/geoengineer2_gra466.gif

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/8338853.stm


==================================================
==================================================
==================================================


http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/3.20.5/orb/4/img/bbc-blocks-dark.png

Geo-engineering: Climate fixes 'could harm billions'

By David Shukman
Science editor, BBC News
26 November 2014
From the section Science & Environment

http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/660/media/images/79264000/jpg/_79264064_107278009.jpg
Using aerosols to block solar radiation represents one approach to geo-engineering

Schemes to tackle climate change could prove disastrous for billions of people, but might be
required for the good of the planet, scientists say.

That is the conclusion of a new set of studies into what's become known as geo-engineering.

This is the so far unproven science of intervening in the climate to bring down temperatures.

These projects work by, for example, shading the Earth from the Sun or soaking up carbon dioxide.

Ideas include aircraft spraying out sulphur particles at high altitude to mimic the cooling effect of
volcanoes or using artificial "trees" to absorb CO2. Long regarded as the most bizarre of all solutions
for global warming, ideas for geo-engineering have come in for more scrutiny in recent years as
international efforts to limit carbon emissions have failed. Now three combined research projects,
led by teams from the universities of Leeds, Bristol and Oxford, have explored the implications in
more detail.The central conclusion, according to Dr Matt Watson of Bristol University, is that the
issues surrounding geo-engineering - how it might work, the effects it might have and the potential
downsides - are "really really complicated".

Sun block

http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/624/media/images/79264000/jpg/_79264670_69c9ae9f-6c4e-413a-ab0f-a47e2628a872.jpg

Injecting aerosols into the stratosphere mimics the cooling effects of volcanoes

Read More.......

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-30197085

[Nick Matkin]

Indeed, geo-engineering probably takes place. But that's not the same as saying every aircraft with a vapour trail is spewing out this stuff everyday. That would be a massive undertaking that would presumably employ thousands of people procuring the raw ingredients, processing them, transporting them (without accident ever - apparently), servicing the special aircraft (you can't just sling extra tanks on a civilian plane without all sorts of consequences regarding fuel, weight and cargo trim, etc.), finding somewhere for them all to take off and land without anyone noticing in a crowded continent like Europe...

I think we need some serious amateur meteorologists and atmospheric physicist to come here and explain in easy words what causes vapour trails, why some days there are more than others, why they sometimes appear to 'switch on and off', why some persist and spread while others don't, why seemingly identical aircraft at similar heights don't produce identical trails, and most of all, why after a 'heavy spraying day' we're not all brushing the stuff off our cars afterwards.

Maybe all this should be asked on an amateur meteorological forum. Oh it has? Thought so...

[Cidersomerset]

Indeed, geo-engineering probably takes place. But that's not the same as saying
every aircraft with a vapour trail is spewing out this stuff everyday

Of course not there are still days and even weeks that only contrail planes fly over
head that's why they stand out for me. Some say its due to weather /temp
change at different altitudes if so that does not explain the sudden mass appearance
of planes flying in different directions , changing a blue sky to milky white within
an hour that lasts all day which I have witnessed well into the hundreds times
over the last decade. Its a bit like the UFO photos are they real or are we
individually interpreting things in this reality differently ?

I know that's going left field but I just watched and posted this article and
will have all fact based researchers pulling out your hair ( if you have any left)..LOL
We all like to quote facts and figures , I do it but they can be manipulated as
we all know.


http://www.vegsource.com/news09/moneybuysscience.jpg


Secret Billionaires Think We’re Trapped Inside a Video Game - as I have
been contending all these years. But what is THEIR agenda for saying so?

By David on 7 October 2016 GMT

https://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Untitled-62.jpg

Are We All Trapped Inside a Video Game?

4ZVeC1gXYNE

Published on 6 Oct 2016
Two billionaires think we're all living inside a video game simulation and are
secretly working with scientists in a desperate attempt to help humanity break out.

[DeDukshyn]

If you look very carefully at how the vapour/chem trail dissolves...

Please continue...

I was watching and I knew that could be done in Photo Shop. I don't know that it was. I guess we'd need to find out more about the uploader?

I'm no video-effects expert, and neither do I know if it was done in PhotoShop or similar, but the vapour did seem to disappear in small 'chunks' when examined closely.

Looks to me like someone might be 'avvin a laff posting this sort of stuff, knowing it'll have a receptive audience and revelling in watching references to it multiply through the internet!

Sometimes I think we underestimate the mischief and nefarious pleasure hoaxers get out of watching people get taken in by their activities. For example, if anyone looks back to this forum thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?66161-Link-to-best-UK-evidence-case-account-closed-), it can be seen how gullible people are. Even by his own admission Ken Parsons (founder and chairman of BEAMS (http://www.beamsinvestigations.org/about.html)) was taken in by the hoax - a rather crude one by all accounts.

Then there were 105 forum posts about all that fake snow nonsense in Feb 2014.

Not everything that doesn't make sense is hoaxed. Just much of it!

I noticed it too ... however, I think it may not be impossible to consider that may be an artifact from video compression. subtitles were added, and the chances that the video right from the camera was RAW are slim so that likely already have initial compression, then adding the subtitles and re-render would be likely another compression. Youtube also recompresses, but not a whole lot. I would like to see the original raw video from the camera to be sure.

It does seem like a hoax, but I just have that nagging thought that compression can sometimes also cause artifacts like that. Compression seeks to reduce changes in pixel colouration over an amount of time (while maintaining image continuity as much as possible) which results in <when threshold of pixel change vs current displayed pixel colour reaches X, recalculate pixel color for the next segment of time> - this is pretty much the sole task of video compressors.

[Tangri]

"stoopid" question: why would benevolent aliens choose to only disolve one chemtrail and not all of them?


Good question :thumbsup:

It seems to me, like a refueling from the source, not destroying it