Wikileaks exposes Hillary Clinton Selling Arms to ISIS

[DNA]

While the world and it's fascist media are discussing Donald Trump's locker room talk, Julian Assange just dropped a Hillary bombshell.
Wikileaks has just posted e-mails of Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State arming Muslim Brotherhood rebels in Libya and then ISIS rebels in Syria.
And no one is talking about it.
Trump and his controversial sexist attitude are bad, sure, but arming terrorists and being responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people I would hope and think should tip the scales and be considered a tad more important, and yet I'm seeing none of this on the mainstream news.


http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/wikileaks-confirms-hillary-sold-weapons-isis-drops-another-bombshell-breaking-news/




Wikileaks head Julian Assange says he has proof that Hillary Clinton lied under oath while giving a public testimony following the 2013 Benghazi terrorist attack. Assange says Wikileaks has 1,700 emails proving Clinton’s statements that she was not involved or aware of any sale of weapons to Syrian “rebels” were a lie. In fact, Assange notes that the former Secretary of State was fully aware of the United States’ involvement in arming rebels in Libya in a bid to help them overtake Qaddafi. Ultimately, it is alleged that those same weapons then made their way to the Islamic State in Syria.



In a Democracy Now interview, Wikileaks’ Julian Assange (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnWWgKxWvtY) claimed that the first batch of Hillary Clinton emails was only the beginning. Assange made the bold claims that his organization has more Clinton emails and that the next batch will be even more damning for the former Secretary of State and presidential hopeful. Wikileaks says that the emails contain proof that Hillary Clinton has lied under oath and that she was fully aware of weapons shipments to Al Qaeda and the Islamic State rebels.
The National Review points out that Wikileaks seems to be honing in on statements made by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (http://www.nationalreview.com/article/438605/hillary-clinton-wikileaks-benghazi-scandal-arm-syrian-rebels-al-qaeda-isis-libya-turkey) following the 2013 Benghazi terrorist attack. In a public testimony, Secretary Clinton claimed that she had no knowledge of weapons transfers to Libya, Turkey, or Syria in the months leading up to the terrorist attack. Clinton said “I don’t have any information on that” when pressed about her personal knowledge of the weapons transfers.

“She claimed to have no knowledge of any transfers of weapons from Libya to Turkey, Syria, or any other countries.”
It was Senator Rand Paul that asked Clinton the damning question when he pointed out that there were news reports of ships leaving Libya with weapons and asked Clinton if she was aware of these transfers. He specifically asked if she or the United States had been involved in “any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out of Libya.” In response to the question, Clinton tried to deflect by saying “nobody has ever raised that with me.” However, upon further pressing, Senator Paul asked directly if Clinton personally knew of any such transfers which she flatly denied.
http://www.inquisitr.com/3408741/wikileaks-says-they-have-1700-emails-proving-hillary-clinton-knew-about-u-s-military-weapons-shipments-to-al-qaeda-and-isis/

[TargeT]

Additionally:


Hillary In Leaked Email: Saudi Arabia And Qatar Are Funding ISIS


Clinton sent the email on August 17, 2014 to Podesta. It was an eight-point plan to defeat ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Clinton’s email said that the United States should support Kurdish forces on the ground with U.S. military advisers and avoid the use of a conventional ground operation.

“While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” Clinton wrote.

The former secretary of state added: “This effort will be enhanced by the stepped up commitment in the [Kurdish Regional Government]. The Qataris and Saudis will be put in a position of balancing policy between their ongoing competition to dominate the Sunni world and the consequences of serious U.S. pressure.”
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/10/hillary-in-leaked-email-saudi-arabia-and-qatar-are-funding-isis/

[Justplain]

What bastards the yankee gov is, as well as the snakes in Qatar and Arabia. It is well known that the saudi snakes bribed the iraqi army officers to disappear when isil invaded, leaving the iraqi army leaderless. What a charade.

[Flash]

Interesting, this explain why Turkey was helping ISIS in some ways - having the US supporting the Kurdish meant major problems for the Turks who have been fighting the Kurds for a century. It also would have been going towards a Kurdish recognized territory which would have meant major territorial losses for Turkey. Most probably Erdogan was against it and this would be why USA would have supported a Turkish government coup based on anything, here on religious organisations (Gulen). Yet, Turkey being Sunni most probably does not want the Qatari or Saudi domination either. Talk about being caught between the bark and the tree.

On the other hand, for America, I do not see the problems with this e-mail to John Podesta. Putting a stop to Qataris and Saudis hegemony in the Middle East is not a bad thing, is it? What is damaging in this e-mail from Clinton? I see it as quite sound for the USA. In other words, USA has problem with its undisciplined warlike allies and want to put a stop to their infighting amongts themselves.



Additionally:


Hillary In Leaked Email: Saudi Arabia And Qatar Are Funding ISIS


Clinton sent the email on August 17, 2014 to Podesta. It was an eight-point plan to defeat ISIS in Iraq and Syria. Clinton’s email said that the United States should support Kurdish forces on the ground with U.S. military advisers and avoid the use of a conventional ground operation.

“While this military/para-military operation is moving forward, we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL and other radical Sunni groups in the region,” Clinton wrote.

The former secretary of state added: “This effort will be enhanced by the stepped up commitment in the [Kurdish Regional Government]. The Qataris and Saudis will be put in a position of balancing policy between their ongoing competition to dominate the Sunni world and the consequences of serious U.S. pressure.”
http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/10/hillary-in-leaked-email-saudi-arabia-and-qatar-are-funding-isis/

[Flash]

In my views, and again, I do not like Clinton, however, while in a war, with allies that do not behave in consistent ways, and provide clandestine support to ISIL, when asked if she knew, in all honesty, she could not have said yes. This would have jeorpadized any attemps they US would have had to solve the clandestine arm supply in a manner that does not provoke more of it.

Although she lied to congress, I do think she did not have the choice, a bit as a spy would have to lie not to jeopardize the whole operation.



While the world and it's fascist media are discussing Donald Trump's locker room talk, Julian Assange just dropped a Hillary bombshell.
Wikileaks has just posted e-mails of Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State arming Muslim Brotherhood rebels in Libya and then ISIS rebels in Syria.
And no one is talking about it.
Trump and his controversial sexist attitude are bad, sure, but arming terrorists and being responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people I would hope and think should tip the scales and be considered a tad more important, and yet I'm seeing none of this on the mainstream news.


http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/wikileaks-confirms-hillary-sold-weapons-isis-drops-another-bombshell-breaking-news/




Wikileaks head Julian Assange says he has proof that Hillary Clinton lied under oath while giving a public testimony following the 2013 Benghazi terrorist attack. Assange says Wikileaks has 1,700 emails proving Clinton’s statements that she was not involved or aware of any sale of weapons to Syrian “rebels” were a lie. In fact, Assange notes that the former Secretary of State was fully aware of the United States’ involvement in arming rebels in Libya in a bid to help them overtake Qaddafi. Ultimately, it is alleged that those same weapons then made their way to the Islamic State in Syria.



In a Democracy Now interview, Wikileaks’ Julian Assange (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnWWgKxWvtY) claimed that the first batch of Hillary Clinton emails was only the beginning. Assange made the bold claims that his organization has more Clinton emails and that the next batch will be even more damning for the former Secretary of State and presidential hopeful. Wikileaks says that the emails contain proof that Hillary Clinton has lied under oath and that she was fully aware of weapons shipments to Al Qaeda and the Islamic State rebels.
The National Review points out that Wikileaks seems to be honing in on statements made by then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton (http://www.nationalreview.com/article/438605/hillary-clinton-wikileaks-benghazi-scandal-arm-syrian-rebels-al-qaeda-isis-libya-turkey) following the 2013 Benghazi terrorist attack. In a public testimony, Secretary Clinton claimed that she had no knowledge of weapons transfers to Libya, Turkey, or Syria in the months leading up to the terrorist attack. Clinton said “I don’t have any information on that” when pressed about her personal knowledge of the weapons transfers.

“She claimed to have no knowledge of any transfers of weapons from Libya to Turkey, Syria, or any other countries.”
It was Senator Rand Paul that asked Clinton the damning question when he pointed out that there were news reports of ships leaving Libya with weapons and asked Clinton if she was aware of these transfers. He specifically asked if she or the United States had been involved in “any procuring of weapons, transfer of weapons, buying, selling, anyhow transferring weapons to Turkey out of Libya.” In response to the question, Clinton tried to deflect by saying “nobody has ever raised that with me.” However, upon further pressing, Senator Paul asked directly if Clinton personally knew of any such transfers which she flatly denied.
http://www.inquisitr.com/3408741/wikileaks-says-they-have-1700-emails-proving-hillary-clinton-knew-about-u-s-military-weapons-shipments-to-al-qaeda-and-isis/

[Baby Steps]

What bastards the yankee gov is, as well as the snakes in Qatar and Arabia. It is well known that the saudi snakes bribed the iraqi army officers to disappear when isil invaded, leaving the iraqi army leaderless. What a charade.

why T makes a thing out of her not saying 'Islamic terror', my theory is that someone has forbidden it, not usa. probably Saudis. i believe that saudi has achieved near dictatorial control over uk and usa. maybe since 1973 when the petro dollar security agreement was made. maybe later.

regarding Rand Paul's question, she did not flatly deny. under pressure it sounded to me like an admission.

the question was did you know about arms shipments from libya to Turkey.
she answered ' to turkey? no'

implicit in her answer is that she DID know about the shipments!

[Matina]

Have you seen this? https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/1766
Sorry,OT but i was excited!

[Althena]

http://i.imgur.com/BKerFqP.jpg

[DNA]

In my views, and again, I do not like Clinton, however, while in a war, with allies that do not behave in consistent ways, and provide clandestine support to ISIL, when asked if she knew, in all honesty, she could not have said yes. This would have jeorpadized any attemps they US would have had to solve the clandestine arm supply in a manner that does not provoke more of it.

Although she lied to congress, I do think she did not have the choice, a bit as a spy would have to lie not to jeopardize the whole operation.


I don't fully understand what your saying Flash. We were never in a war. The US was destabilizing Libya and arming extremists in order to topple Gaddaffi, we all knew this excepting of course the morons who still listen and believe the main stream media.
Then Clinton took those weapons and armed Syrian extremists we later understood to be ISIS.
But here is the big deal.
We've been lied to at every opportunity and we have been told that ISIS is some boogeyman that we have to fight.
The US has been engaged in bombing and attacking Assad in Syria under the pretense of attacking ISIS.
Just a couple of weeks ago the US bombed one of Assad's battalions that really was fighting ISIS, and ISIS was getting their ass kicked, so in order to save ISIS the US bombed Assad's army battalion and then apologized and said it was an accident.
This kind of lying and BS is what our President and his Secretary of State have been up to.

[Flash]

If you are not in a war in syria, Irak and Afghanistan, and Lybia, I do not know what being is a war is. Of course you are at war. A proxy war. Yet, it is still lead by USA and probably Israel. Your description here says it too. USA is at war, by proxy in appearances. And not against ISIS, but against the transporting of gaz line from Qatar and Saudi Arabia through Syria for example (not far from the Irak's war and petroleum). Or for any other reasons we would not know.

If I were Clinton, I would have protected what I know because of being at war.



In my views, and again, I do not like Clinton, however, while in a war, with allies that do not behave in consistent ways, and provide clandestine support to ISIL, when asked if she knew, in all honesty, she could not have said yes. This would have jeorpadized any attemps they US would have had to solve the clandestine arm supply in a manner that does not provoke more of it.

Although she lied to congress, I do think she did not have the choice, a bit as a spy would have to lie not to jeopardize the whole operation.


I don't fully understand what your saying Flash. We were never in a war. The US was destabilizing Libya and arming extremists in order to topple Gaddaffi, we all knew this excepting of course the morons who still listen and believe the main stream media.
Then Clinton took those weapons and armed Syrian extremists we later understood to be ISIS.
But here is the big deal.
We've been lied to at every opportunity and we have been told that ISIS is some boogeyman that we have to fight.
The US has been engaged in bombing and attacking Assad in Syria under the pretense of attacking ISIS.
Just a couple of weeks ago the US bombed one of Assad's battalions that really was fighting ISIS, and ISIS was getting their ass kicked, so in order to save ISIS the US bombed Assad's army battalion and then apologized and said it was an accident.
This kind of lying and BS is what our President and his Secretary of State have been up to.

[TargeT]

If you are not in a war in syria, Irak and Afghanistan, and Lybia, I do not know what being is a war is. Of course you are at war. A proxy war.

Proxy wars are not legal in the US, we may actually be doing that; but it is not common public knowledge and it would be looked badly on if it were widely known.

The US is "suppose" to "declare war" via the Congress before it takes military action; but that's modernly changed to "they do what they want".


Yet, it is still lead by USA and probably Israel. Your description here says it too. USA is at war, by proxy in appearances. And not against ISIS, but against the transporting of gaz line from Qatar and Saudi Arabia through Syria for example (not far from the Irak's war and petroleum). Or for any other reasons we would not know.

Again, those are all "hidden" motivations that most people don't even suspect, she cannot openly support them for any reason legally. She lied out of a valid fear of persecution.

[DNA]

If you are not in a war in syria, Irak and Afghanistan, and Lybia, I do not know what being is a war is. Of course you are at war. A proxy war. Yet, it is still lead by USA and probably Israel. Your description here says it too. USA is at war, by proxy in appearances. And not against ISIS, but against the transporting of gaz line from Qatar and Saudi Arabia through Syria for example (not far from the Irak's war and petroleum). Or for any other reasons we would not know.

If I were Clinton, I would have protected what I know because of being at war.


If Clinton did in fact lie to Rand Paul who questioned her (bless Rand Paul's heart for putting her on the spot like he did :heart:), then Clinton is guilty of lying to congress and purging herself far worse than her husband ever did. :rofl: :party:
Not that I think congress will ever prosecute her over this.
It is becoming more and more apparent in the USA that if the MSM does not anoint something as "news" than surely it is not "news". :drama:

[Lifebringer]

Yes Hillary promised to get to the bottom of disclosure. She's been interested since the 80's. At 1st I thought it was a rouse to gain Bernie supporters and college nerds votes, but since Assange has peeped her e-mail cards, I think it was being used as a bargaining chip to back off or she'll go public before the election. Won't be long now, by my reconing.

[Lifebringer]

Clinton is playing that disclosure card in more ways than one. All those obsolete weapons sold, will never compare w/US military technology, repackaged ET discoveries and frequency. Howerver to balance the annialation scales, this tech was also given to Russia/China, while the bad ones gave tech to Jun Un of N. Korea.
A focus of cooler heads for peace, must hit the critical mass on this. If anyone's gonna destroy this world, or it's people in Karma, is one thing, but ill tempered psychos in it for the highest dollar as motivation, is quite another.
Choose wisely in 3 weeks.

[sunwings]

10 Things I trust more than Hillary Clinton:

Mexican tap water
Gas station sushi
A rattlesnake with a ‘pet me’ sign
OJ Simpson showing me his knife collection
Bill Cosby as a bartender
An e-mail from Nigeria
A prostate exam from Captain Hook
Brian Williams’ news reports
Prayers for peace from Al Sharpton
An elevator ride with Ray Rice

[Hervé]

ISIS Leader Calls for American Muslim Voters to Support Hillary Clinton (http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/isis-leader-calls-for-american-muslim-voters-to-support-hillary-clinton/)


http://worldnewsdailyreport.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/isis-hillary.jpg


Top ISIS leader now believed to be the number two behind the terrorist organization, Amadh Abu Makmud Al-alwani, put up a video this week following the second presidential debate asking American Muslim voters to support Hillary Clinton.

The controversial video that was taken down by YouTube only hours after it was uploaded showed top ISIS leader Amadh Abu Makmud Al-alwani threatening those who would decide to vote for Donald Trump and calling them “infidels” and “goat f—-ers”.
“ All Muslims who will show support for the dog-faced Trump are guilty of masiya (mortal sin) ”

– ISIS No.2 leader, Amadh Abu Makmud Al-alwani

He also claimed that even if Hillary was a woman and a “two face devil”, had the “charm of a pig” and was “treacherous as the snake”, that the Democratic presidential hopeful was at least in league with the “allied countries of the Islamic state” such as Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

Supporting the “dog-faced” Trump
Al-alwani also warned all Muslims not to take his warnings lightly and that supporters of Trump would be severely punished on earth and in Jannah (afterlife).

“Trump is a dog, he is the scum of the earth. He boasts that he will take our oil and join Russia, Syria and the Shia Iranians against us in our holy fight” he added, visibly angry.

“This (dog-faced) scumbag must not reach Washington. Although it is a sin to put an inferior being such as a woman into a position of power, it is the true plan of Satan to divide the Muslims of America. It would be dirty and danis (filthy) to vote for Trump,” he explained.

Amadh Abu Makmud Al-alwani has risen as a prominent ISIS leader figure since coalition forces carried out a “precision strike” last August, successfully targeting Abu Muhammad al-Adnani, number two of the terrorist organization at the time.

[Intuitive Fish]

I thought this was a great video by the U.S. Peace Council who interviewed independent sources showing that the war in Syria isn't a civil war but a proxy invasion by the U.S. It also explains the powerful propaganda fed to the U.S. public which they're working against.

c8JppJyVxYU

The operation is clearly much bigger than Hillary, but Hillary is clearly involved. Here are 10 convincing reasons the Clintons will likely take the U.S. into war within Hillary's first year as president, as well as her open push for expanding nuclear arms:

https://medium.com/@JeanetteJing/top-10-reasons-the-clintons-will-start-a-war-next-year-44e40595eb8c#.xo0cxd5u6