View Full Version : Simon Parkes Alerts
Ba-ba-Ra
31st October 2016, 17:44
For those who believe (trust) Simon's info here's the latest for USA -
And based on what's currently happening within US election process (meaning new revelations coming out about Hillary via Weiner's emails) this isn't surprising.
Simon's Alert:
A few US generals have held a secret meeting to discuss defending the American people and the constitution against Capitol Hill
and
Head-ups
42 US states have put their national guard on alert.
No further info as of yet...
shadowstalker
31st October 2016, 18:06
Considering what the BLM might have planned if Trump is elected then I am not surprised about any alert.
greybeard
31st October 2016, 18:14
With respect--one would not have to be an insider--whistle blower, to come up with that.
Its a logical possibility--may even be true or not as the case may be.
Until there is evidence of this its hypothetical.
Chris
Cidersomerset
31st October 2016, 18:16
No indication on the web I can see , I would of thought Veterans Today .
Info wars or one of Liberty sites would have some inkling if this were
about to happen. Secrecy or not ? but we will have to see certainly
if Hillary got arrested and the election postponed that may cause
unrest ?
http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/vt-logo2015b.jpg
http://www.veteranstoday.com/
INFO WARS....
http://www.infowars.com/
greybeard
31st October 2016, 18:19
I would rather listen to Cidersomerset than most as he researches and cross checks--he knows where to go to validate or otherwise.
Chris
dancing bear
31st October 2016, 18:34
This was posted on Icke site
https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2016/10/28/unprecedented-letter-from-chair-of-joint-chiefs-suggests-u-s-military-does-not-want-a-president-hillary/comment-page-1/
osted on October 28, 2016 by Dr. Eowyn | 19 Comments
Four days ago, on October 24, 2016, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joe Dunford sent a fascinating piece of communication, titled “Upholding Our Oath,” to every member of the U.S. Armed Services.
gen-joseph-dunford
Note: General Joseph Dunford Jr., 60, was the 36th Commandant of the U.S. Marine Corps. Nominated by Obama, Dunford became the 19th Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff on October 1, 2015.
This is what Gen. Dunford wrote:
“As the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff…as our country again prepares for a peaceful transfer of power to a new administration, I write to share my views regarding our mutual obligations as military professionals and rights as citizens during this election season.
Every service member swears “to support and defend the Constitution of the United States” and to “bear true faith and allegiance to the same.” This oath is embedded in our professional culture and underpins the values that shape and define our all-volunteer force. Beginning with General George Washington resigning his military commission, our deliberate and disciplined commitment to upholding the principle of civilian control of the military underpins not only our warrior ethos but also the expectations of how we conduct ourselves while in uniform.
While we must always safeguard our professional integrity, extra vigilance is required during any political transition. Our individual and collective obligation during this election season is twofold. First, we must recognize that we have one Commander in Chief, and until authority is transferred on January 20, 2017, the Joint Force must remain clearly focused on and responsive to the existing National Command Authority. Second, the Joint Force must conduct itself in such a way that the new administration has confidence that it will be served by a professional, competent, and apolitical military. This is especially important in the context of delivering the best military advice.
Every member of the Joint Force has the right to exercise his or her civic duty, including learning and discussing — even debating — the policy issues driving the election cycle and voting for his or her candidate of choice. Provided that we follow the guidance and regulations governing individual political participation, we should be proud of our civic engagement. What we must collectively guard against is allowing our institution to become politicized, or even perceived as being politicized, by how we conduct ourselves during engagements with the media, the public, or in open or social forums.
We are living in the most volatile and complex security environment since World War II. Whether confronting violent extremist organizations seeking to destroy our way of life or dealing with state actors threatening international order, threats to our national security require a Joint Force that is ready, capable, and trusted. To that end, I have a duty to protect the integrity and political neutrality of our military profession. But this obligation is not mine alone. It belongs to every Soldier, Marine, Sailor, Airman, and Coastguardsman. Thank you for joining me in honoring our history, our traditions, and the institutions of the U.S. Armed Forces by upholding the principle of political neutrality.”
Even without reading between the lines, General Dunford clearly has concerns about politicization of the military and its obligation and commitment to political neutrality and noninterference in politics. That the head of the Joint Chiefs of Staff must remind members of the Armed Forces that they must “uphold” their oath both suggests and implies that the opposite is going on, i.e., the military is politicized and there are fears that it will intervene in civilian politics.
If this pic (below) of a young U.S. Marine is any indication, Gen. Dunford has good reasons to issue the “Upholding Our Oath” communication.
marine-against-hillary
A year ago, a Rasmussen Reports national survey of active and retired military personnel found that only 15% had a favorable opinion of Hillary Clinton, with just 3% who viewed her very favorably. A staggering 81% had an unfavorable opinion of her, including 69% who had a very unfavorable view of her.
A similar survey today is sure to find even higher unfavorable ratings for Hillary among those whom she would command as their Commander in Chief.
Cidersomerset
31st October 2016, 18:45
Four days ago, on October 24, 2016, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joe Dunford sent a
fascinating piece of communication, titled “Upholding Our Oath,” to every member of the U.S. Armed Services.
I have heard this mentioned that Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joe Dunford is
concerned if the US invades Syria which Hillary has threatened to do more or
less......The neo/demo - cons have been trying to step up the pressure in Syria
and Gen Dunford pointed out to create a no - fly zone over Aleppo and further
afield would inevitably in his opinion lead to conflict with Russia and Assads forces.
Now whether this would lead to a coup in the US is a big leap imo....
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Syria No Fly Zone Means WAR With Russia, General Warns Congress
VY36P6Tyf98
Published on 26 Sep 2016
Four Star General Joseph Dunford, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Warns Congress Over
Syria No Fly Zone. He says it will trigger War Against Russia and Syria! Alex Jones explains how
this is all by the design from the Globalist alliance of George Soros/Obama/Hillary and that World
War III will erupt if we implement a Syria No Fly Zone! The real threat comes from Saudi Arabian
Wahhabist infiltrating Syrian population and funded by George Soros, and that Syria and Israel
would like to try and get along!
====================================================
====================================================
RickWells.US - McCain Steps On Gen Dunford To Protect Establishment Elite War
Option in Syria
iKiQmFJqZYg
Published on 25 Sep 2016
Senator Wicker (R-MS) seems hesitant and perhaps unfamiliar with the situation
the committee he's serving on, the Armed Services Committee, is dealing with in
Syria. He's also not being very specific, a factor that an angry little establishment
Senator from Arizona readily exploits in the interest of keeping their intervention
options intact.
Wicker noted that he and a Democrat Senator were discussing the possibility the
US imposing a no-fly zone in Syria to stop the barrel bombing by the Syrian
government. He first asks Defense Secretary Carter, who attempts to define the
question more specifically, saying, "There are a number of different proposals that
have been made." He decides to focus on the plan that Secretary of State Kerry is
currently promoting.
Carter describes it as "A no-fly zone for the Russians and the Syrians who are
attacking the Syrian people. If they're talking about a no-fly zone for American
aircraft fighting ISIL, needless to say, that's not going to get any enthusiasm and
get strong opposition."
Omni
31st October 2016, 18:59
Why enable Simon's disinformation?
Ba-ba-Ra
31st October 2016, 20:00
It's difficult to know where to post info about Hillary and what's happening in USA elections as there are so many threads going.
I'll post this here and on another. Reason for posting on this thread as Corbett's interview with Michel Chossudovsky of GlobalResearch.ca suggests looking at who's behind Comey's decision. Several scenarios are suggested one of which is Mr. Global no longer sees Hillary as viable candidate.
My thoughts: if that is the case, what might they have to prepare for to keep peace here?
https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1223-parsing-the-comey-letter-with-michel-chossudovsky/
provolon
3rd November 2016, 10:03
Let's all talk bad about Simon Parkes!! you are a good member of the forum if you do =D
Sequoia
3rd November 2016, 11:16
I cannot believe this continuous crazy..Do you even know who gen dun ford even is? he's background, track record, who he's with, his past, anything? don't "believe" everything do your homework and don't "believe" the hype that just sounds good without any merit.
Omni
3rd November 2016, 23:54
Let's all talk bad about Simon Parkes!! you are a good member of the forum if you do =D
How about this: Lets all continue allowing naive people be deceived by a proven manipulator. Which sounds better?
I have been debating Simon's info since the time when if you opposed him you got maybe 1 thanks, and anyone opposing you defending Simon got like 5-25 thanks. The power of group think I guess...
amor
4th November 2016, 09:08
Do the American People have any backing from the Military at all? If they walked into Congress and the White House and threw the "B's" out as the people of Iceland did to their set of sellouts, they would not even get past the door; and the beat goes on. If something is not done NOW, we are all going to be sorry as a result of have the TRAITORS walk all over us.
Ron Mauer Sr
6th October 2017, 14:12
Although I do not give Simon much attention any more, I found this and my intuition indicated he was probably correct.
Simon Parks mentioned on his 10/1/17 show. The disclosure card is being held back by the elite for use as a distraction when financial markets crash. The big $ crash that everybody freaks about.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.