Bob
3rd November 2016, 23:36
And Hillary says she doesn't want presidential candidate Donald Trump to have access to nuclear weapons, meanwhile one can look at the smoking gun of the Clinton administration's practices, wink wink, turn the other way activity, during the 1990's which virtually gave China a pass (under pay for play doctrine) to have special miniaturized nuclear weapons secrets, allows China to have access to special US satellite technology.. and to let secrets to be stolen out of the US national research Labs.
From a NY Times report getting into those Clinton years, http://www.nytimes.com/1999/03/06/world/breach-los-alamos-special-report-china-stole-nuclear-secrets-for-bombs-us-aides.html
(for a moment digressing back into another thread, dealing with Vince Foster's death, here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?94231-The-Murder----of-Clinton-s-friend-Vince-Foster&p=1110066&viewfull=1#post1110066 , Ms. Clinton makes it pretty clear, that SHE is running the Presidency, not Bill... )
Hillary had long relied on Foster as a confidant, telling him before Bill's inauguration that, despite being an unelected spouse, she was going to "take command" and be "involved in this presidency" - a conversation he recorded in a journal. In turn, he idolised her.
Keep that firmly in mind, that "Hillary was going to take command [of the presidency]" when reading the nuclear theft and policy allowing nuclear secrets to be openly transferred, and covertly stolen by China during this Clinton Administration period..
From the article:
At the [Clinton Administration's] Energy Department, officials waited more than a year to act on the F.B.I.'s 1997 recommendations to improve security at the weapons laboratories and restrict the suspect's access to classified information, officials said.
The department's chief of intelligence, who raised the first alarm about the case in 1995, was ordered last year by senior officials not to tell Congress about his findings because critics might use them to attack the Administration's China policies, officials said.
And at the White House, senior aides to Mr. Clinton fostered a skeptical view of the evidence of Chinese espionage and its significance.
White House officials, for example, said they determined on learning of it [the theft of critical nuclear miniature nuclear bomb making secrets] that the Chinese spying would have no bearing on the Administration's dealings with China.
(note: reader, put that in perspective for a moment, technology was stolen allowing nuclear weapons to be installed in small packages, allowing for easy deployment in land based rocket launchers, submarines, even satellites.. and paraphrasing what may have been said behind closed doors "no problem bro.. " (remember pay for play)...)
The Clinton Administration controlled by Bill and obviously Hillary (her remarks to Vince Foster) included the increased exports of satellites and other militarily [dual use] items.
They continued to advocate looser controls over sales of supercomputers and other equipment, even as intelligence analysts documented the scope of China's espionage.
by the mid-1990's, China had built and tested such small bombs, a breakthrough that officials say was accelerated by the theft of American nuclear secrets from Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
The espionage is believed to have occurred in the mid-1980's, officials said. But it was not detected until 1995, when Americans analyzing Chinese nuclear test results found similarities to America's most advanced miniature warhead, the W-88. (Clinton did nothing to stop this).
By the next year, Government investigators had identified a suspect, an American scientist at Los Alamos laboratory, where the atomic bomb was developed. The investigators also concluded that Beijing was continuing to steal secrets from the Government's major nuclear weapons laboratories, which had been increasingly opened to foreign visitors since the end of the cold war.
In 1997, as Mr. Clinton prepared to meet with President Jiang Zemin of China, Mr. Samore asked the Central Intelligence Agency for a quick alternative analysis of the issue. The agency found that China had stolen secrets from Los Alamos but differed with the Energy Department over the significance of the spying.
China's technical advance allows it to make small warheads for use in submarines, mobile missiles and long-range missiles with multiple warheads -- the main elements of a modern nuclear force.
While White House officials question whether China will actually deploy a more advanced nuclear force soon, they acknowledge that Beijing has made plans to do so at some point.
(note - keep in mind the Chinese sabre rattling and deployment in the South China Sea, these days in 2015/2016 now that they have sufficient supercomputers, nuclear designs from the US, as allowed by the Clinton Administration)
Los Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories, in New Mexico, had in 1994 (under a policy setup by the Clinton Administration) been granted waivers from an Energy Department policy that prohibited foreign scientists visiting for purposes of scientific reasons to exchange data, that be exempted from background checks. (this is tantamount to treason in nuclear weapons laboratories)
Lab officials resented the intrusions caused by counterintelligence measures, arguing that restrictions on foreign visitors would clash with the labs' new mandate to help Russia and other nations safeguard their nuclear stockpiles. (huh, letting foreign scientists into nuclear development labs in the US conflicts with other nations' nuclear stockpile safeguards? What type of double-speak is that?)
The Clinton Administration was also using increased access to the laboratories to support its policy of engagement with China. (who was objecting to this potentially treasonous policy? and WHO claimed that they were RUNNING the administration?)
By April 1996, the Energy Department decided to brief the White House. A group of senior officials including Mr. Trulock sat down with Mr. Berger, then President Clinton's deputy national security adviser, to tell him that China appeared to have acquired the W-88 and that a spy for China might still be at Los Alamos.
''I was first made aware of this in 1996,'' Mr. Berger, now national security adviser, said in an interview.
Energy officials were being stymied in their efforts to address security problems at the laboratories.
After Federico Pena (former Denver Mayor, then Transportation secretary) became Energy Secretary in early 1997, a previously approved counterintelligence program was quietly placed on the back burner for more than a year, officials said. Pena was also responsible for pushing Denver International Airport (http://www.hcn.org/issues/27/780) (a major hub for conspiratorial conjecture). From Mayor of Denver, to Transportation Secretary, to Energy Secretary - hmmm... about that "technical experience" needed (or not)..
''In July 1997 Sandy was briefed fully by the D.O.E. on China's full access to nuclear weapons designs, a much broader pattern,'' one White House official said.
Officials said Mr. Berger was told that there was evidence of several other Chinese espionage operations that were still under way inside the weapons labs.
Term 2 of Bill Clinton - Congress was examining the role of foreign money in the 1996 campaign, as charges emerged that Beijing had secretly funneled money into Democratic coffers.
Bill and Hillary's Presidential Administration was moving to strengthen its strategic and commercial links with China in 1997. President Clinton had already eased the commercial sale of supercomputers and satellite technology, and he wanted to cement a nuclear cooperation accord at the upcoming summit meeting, enabling American companies to sell China commercial nuclear reactors.
Nuclear reactors are needed to make weapons grade nuclear material for nuclear weapons. Keep that in mind. see http://www.ccnr.org/plute.html conversion of a commercial reactor to upgrade plutonium section - how fuel rods are quickly removed and plutonium extracted.. power reactors leave the rods in longer..
Don't let doublespeak pull the wool over one's eyes that 'special uranium or weapons grade plutonium' is needed for a nuclear bomb - see http://www.ccnr.org/plute_bomb.html "1962 an underground nuclear test at the Nevada Test Site used reactor-grade plutonium in the nuclear explosive." Also, it is very possible to UPGRADE "reactor grade nuclear material" to weapons grade. If the powered up uranium/plutonium reactor is there that is the start - the end result or the material produced by the reactor CAN become a nuclear weapon. Please keep that in mind.
As an American official described it: ''The areas of agreement between D.O.E. (Department of Energy) and C.I.A. [investigations] were that China definitely benefited from access to U.S. nuclear weapons information that was obtained from open sources (provided by the Clinton Administration and published in numerous places), conversations with D.O.E. scientists in the United States and China, and espionage conducted by China.
In July 1998, the House Intelligence Committee requested an update on the case, officials said. Mr. Trulock forwarded the request in a memo to and in conversations with Elizabeth Moler, then Acting Energy Secretary. Ms. Moler ordered him not to brief the House panel for fear that the information would be used to attack the President's China policy, according to an account he later gave Congressional investigators.
Ms. Moler, now a Washington lawyer, says she does not remember the request to allow Mr. Trulock to brief Congress and denies delaying the process. (Remember Vince Foster, deputy council being found suicided in 1993..)
Clinton's wink wink policy in "pay for play" (http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/18/judicial-watch-uncovers-hillary-clinton-emails-pay-play-revelations/) - As the F.B.I. investigation intensified, the Cox commitee completed a 700-page secret report in which it found that China's theft had harmed American national security, saving the Chinese untold time and money in nuclear weapons research.
-- the full article here : http://www.nytimes.com/1999/03/06/world/breach-los-alamos-special-report-china-stole-nuclear-secrets-for-bombs-us-aides.html
AND Hillary says we should not let Donald Trump restrict NAFTA (http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/11/01/trump-camp-clinton-trade-policies-destroy-lives-new-mexico/) (China allowed favorite nation status), and that Hillary says Donald Trump should not be allowed access to the military chain of command in determining first strike or retaliatory strike ability.. History apparently shows something very revealing about the "nuclear" issue, just who let whom have access in "pay for play"..
Does the world really want Hillary as the US Commander in Chief? Do the American people?
ref: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-twitter-presidential-evidence-republican-should-not-get-debate-nuclear-a7332966.html - "Presidential debate: Hillary Clinton says Donald Trump’s tweets are evidence he should stay away from nuclear codes"
re: NAFTA - December 17, 1992. Bill Clinton was already the new 'president elect' but not sworn in just yet.. NAFTA was negotiated and signed by President George H.W. Bush in December 1992, after he had lost the election to Clinton.
The day after George H.W. Bush, - the president who LOST to at that time president-elect Bll Clinton Clinton reiterated his campaign assertion that there would have to be new job and environmental protections, and safeguards against sudden trade surges, but they could be settled without renegotiating the entire treaty with Mexico and Canada before he submitted implementing legislation. In a statement, still Arkansas Governor Clinton said, “I will pursue those other things that I think need to be done in the public interest, then I will prepare implementing legislation and try to pass it in Congress.” Those job protections, like job protections today, never materialized in Congress because of Republicans the Clinton's say.
Hillary and Bill Clinton both attack presidential candidate Donald Trump when Trump says Clinton was president during the "SIGNING" (although not sworn in under oath later). Bush had lost the election when he had signed NAFTA. In the details, the people (electoral college) said Clinton was the winner, Trump apparently felt, Clinton was ALL NAFTA. And quite possibly Donald Trump remembers Bill Clinton pushing China into Most Favored Nation Status.
reference - Clinton reverses campaign pledge, grants China Most Favored Nation (MFN) status - http://tech.mit.edu/V114/N27/china.27w.html
From a NY Times report getting into those Clinton years, http://www.nytimes.com/1999/03/06/world/breach-los-alamos-special-report-china-stole-nuclear-secrets-for-bombs-us-aides.html
(for a moment digressing back into another thread, dealing with Vince Foster's death, here: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?94231-The-Murder----of-Clinton-s-friend-Vince-Foster&p=1110066&viewfull=1#post1110066 , Ms. Clinton makes it pretty clear, that SHE is running the Presidency, not Bill... )
Hillary had long relied on Foster as a confidant, telling him before Bill's inauguration that, despite being an unelected spouse, she was going to "take command" and be "involved in this presidency" - a conversation he recorded in a journal. In turn, he idolised her.
Keep that firmly in mind, that "Hillary was going to take command [of the presidency]" when reading the nuclear theft and policy allowing nuclear secrets to be openly transferred, and covertly stolen by China during this Clinton Administration period..
From the article:
At the [Clinton Administration's] Energy Department, officials waited more than a year to act on the F.B.I.'s 1997 recommendations to improve security at the weapons laboratories and restrict the suspect's access to classified information, officials said.
The department's chief of intelligence, who raised the first alarm about the case in 1995, was ordered last year by senior officials not to tell Congress about his findings because critics might use them to attack the Administration's China policies, officials said.
And at the White House, senior aides to Mr. Clinton fostered a skeptical view of the evidence of Chinese espionage and its significance.
White House officials, for example, said they determined on learning of it [the theft of critical nuclear miniature nuclear bomb making secrets] that the Chinese spying would have no bearing on the Administration's dealings with China.
(note: reader, put that in perspective for a moment, technology was stolen allowing nuclear weapons to be installed in small packages, allowing for easy deployment in land based rocket launchers, submarines, even satellites.. and paraphrasing what may have been said behind closed doors "no problem bro.. " (remember pay for play)...)
The Clinton Administration controlled by Bill and obviously Hillary (her remarks to Vince Foster) included the increased exports of satellites and other militarily [dual use] items.
They continued to advocate looser controls over sales of supercomputers and other equipment, even as intelligence analysts documented the scope of China's espionage.
by the mid-1990's, China had built and tested such small bombs, a breakthrough that officials say was accelerated by the theft of American nuclear secrets from Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
The espionage is believed to have occurred in the mid-1980's, officials said. But it was not detected until 1995, when Americans analyzing Chinese nuclear test results found similarities to America's most advanced miniature warhead, the W-88. (Clinton did nothing to stop this).
By the next year, Government investigators had identified a suspect, an American scientist at Los Alamos laboratory, where the atomic bomb was developed. The investigators also concluded that Beijing was continuing to steal secrets from the Government's major nuclear weapons laboratories, which had been increasingly opened to foreign visitors since the end of the cold war.
In 1997, as Mr. Clinton prepared to meet with President Jiang Zemin of China, Mr. Samore asked the Central Intelligence Agency for a quick alternative analysis of the issue. The agency found that China had stolen secrets from Los Alamos but differed with the Energy Department over the significance of the spying.
China's technical advance allows it to make small warheads for use in submarines, mobile missiles and long-range missiles with multiple warheads -- the main elements of a modern nuclear force.
While White House officials question whether China will actually deploy a more advanced nuclear force soon, they acknowledge that Beijing has made plans to do so at some point.
(note - keep in mind the Chinese sabre rattling and deployment in the South China Sea, these days in 2015/2016 now that they have sufficient supercomputers, nuclear designs from the US, as allowed by the Clinton Administration)
Los Alamos and Sandia National Laboratories, in New Mexico, had in 1994 (under a policy setup by the Clinton Administration) been granted waivers from an Energy Department policy that prohibited foreign scientists visiting for purposes of scientific reasons to exchange data, that be exempted from background checks. (this is tantamount to treason in nuclear weapons laboratories)
Lab officials resented the intrusions caused by counterintelligence measures, arguing that restrictions on foreign visitors would clash with the labs' new mandate to help Russia and other nations safeguard their nuclear stockpiles. (huh, letting foreign scientists into nuclear development labs in the US conflicts with other nations' nuclear stockpile safeguards? What type of double-speak is that?)
The Clinton Administration was also using increased access to the laboratories to support its policy of engagement with China. (who was objecting to this potentially treasonous policy? and WHO claimed that they were RUNNING the administration?)
By April 1996, the Energy Department decided to brief the White House. A group of senior officials including Mr. Trulock sat down with Mr. Berger, then President Clinton's deputy national security adviser, to tell him that China appeared to have acquired the W-88 and that a spy for China might still be at Los Alamos.
''I was first made aware of this in 1996,'' Mr. Berger, now national security adviser, said in an interview.
Energy officials were being stymied in their efforts to address security problems at the laboratories.
After Federico Pena (former Denver Mayor, then Transportation secretary) became Energy Secretary in early 1997, a previously approved counterintelligence program was quietly placed on the back burner for more than a year, officials said. Pena was also responsible for pushing Denver International Airport (http://www.hcn.org/issues/27/780) (a major hub for conspiratorial conjecture). From Mayor of Denver, to Transportation Secretary, to Energy Secretary - hmmm... about that "technical experience" needed (or not)..
''In July 1997 Sandy was briefed fully by the D.O.E. on China's full access to nuclear weapons designs, a much broader pattern,'' one White House official said.
Officials said Mr. Berger was told that there was evidence of several other Chinese espionage operations that were still under way inside the weapons labs.
Term 2 of Bill Clinton - Congress was examining the role of foreign money in the 1996 campaign, as charges emerged that Beijing had secretly funneled money into Democratic coffers.
Bill and Hillary's Presidential Administration was moving to strengthen its strategic and commercial links with China in 1997. President Clinton had already eased the commercial sale of supercomputers and satellite technology, and he wanted to cement a nuclear cooperation accord at the upcoming summit meeting, enabling American companies to sell China commercial nuclear reactors.
Nuclear reactors are needed to make weapons grade nuclear material for nuclear weapons. Keep that in mind. see http://www.ccnr.org/plute.html conversion of a commercial reactor to upgrade plutonium section - how fuel rods are quickly removed and plutonium extracted.. power reactors leave the rods in longer..
Don't let doublespeak pull the wool over one's eyes that 'special uranium or weapons grade plutonium' is needed for a nuclear bomb - see http://www.ccnr.org/plute_bomb.html "1962 an underground nuclear test at the Nevada Test Site used reactor-grade plutonium in the nuclear explosive." Also, it is very possible to UPGRADE "reactor grade nuclear material" to weapons grade. If the powered up uranium/plutonium reactor is there that is the start - the end result or the material produced by the reactor CAN become a nuclear weapon. Please keep that in mind.
As an American official described it: ''The areas of agreement between D.O.E. (Department of Energy) and C.I.A. [investigations] were that China definitely benefited from access to U.S. nuclear weapons information that was obtained from open sources (provided by the Clinton Administration and published in numerous places), conversations with D.O.E. scientists in the United States and China, and espionage conducted by China.
In July 1998, the House Intelligence Committee requested an update on the case, officials said. Mr. Trulock forwarded the request in a memo to and in conversations with Elizabeth Moler, then Acting Energy Secretary. Ms. Moler ordered him not to brief the House panel for fear that the information would be used to attack the President's China policy, according to an account he later gave Congressional investigators.
Ms. Moler, now a Washington lawyer, says she does not remember the request to allow Mr. Trulock to brief Congress and denies delaying the process. (Remember Vince Foster, deputy council being found suicided in 1993..)
Clinton's wink wink policy in "pay for play" (http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/08/18/judicial-watch-uncovers-hillary-clinton-emails-pay-play-revelations/) - As the F.B.I. investigation intensified, the Cox commitee completed a 700-page secret report in which it found that China's theft had harmed American national security, saving the Chinese untold time and money in nuclear weapons research.
-- the full article here : http://www.nytimes.com/1999/03/06/world/breach-los-alamos-special-report-china-stole-nuclear-secrets-for-bombs-us-aides.html
AND Hillary says we should not let Donald Trump restrict NAFTA (http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/11/01/trump-camp-clinton-trade-policies-destroy-lives-new-mexico/) (China allowed favorite nation status), and that Hillary says Donald Trump should not be allowed access to the military chain of command in determining first strike or retaliatory strike ability.. History apparently shows something very revealing about the "nuclear" issue, just who let whom have access in "pay for play"..
Does the world really want Hillary as the US Commander in Chief? Do the American people?
ref: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-twitter-presidential-evidence-republican-should-not-get-debate-nuclear-a7332966.html - "Presidential debate: Hillary Clinton says Donald Trump’s tweets are evidence he should stay away from nuclear codes"
re: NAFTA - December 17, 1992. Bill Clinton was already the new 'president elect' but not sworn in just yet.. NAFTA was negotiated and signed by President George H.W. Bush in December 1992, after he had lost the election to Clinton.
The day after George H.W. Bush, - the president who LOST to at that time president-elect Bll Clinton Clinton reiterated his campaign assertion that there would have to be new job and environmental protections, and safeguards against sudden trade surges, but they could be settled without renegotiating the entire treaty with Mexico and Canada before he submitted implementing legislation. In a statement, still Arkansas Governor Clinton said, “I will pursue those other things that I think need to be done in the public interest, then I will prepare implementing legislation and try to pass it in Congress.” Those job protections, like job protections today, never materialized in Congress because of Republicans the Clinton's say.
Hillary and Bill Clinton both attack presidential candidate Donald Trump when Trump says Clinton was president during the "SIGNING" (although not sworn in under oath later). Bush had lost the election when he had signed NAFTA. In the details, the people (electoral college) said Clinton was the winner, Trump apparently felt, Clinton was ALL NAFTA. And quite possibly Donald Trump remembers Bill Clinton pushing China into Most Favored Nation Status.
reference - Clinton reverses campaign pledge, grants China Most Favored Nation (MFN) status - http://tech.mit.edu/V114/N27/china.27w.html