Symbolism present during inauguration speech?

[WhiteLove]

Joseph P. Farrell published an interesting speculation article today about the possibility that there was some background symbolism present during a part of the speech.

What happened was that a group of soldiers walked up behind Trump prior to him mentioning that this is a moment when the power is transferred back to the people, which btw. in my opinion was some pretty democratic words.

When I saw this my own interpretation was that the soldiers wanted to stand behind Trump's words when he mentioned the power now shifts back to the people. When he then mentioned that the power had been in the hands of a few in Washington at the cost of the people, the soldiers left which could be understood as them walking away from those and that past.

But another possible interpretation of this, the polarity of this, could be that the soldiers made themselves ready so that when Trump would mention those few powerful persons in Washington acting out their own agendas at the cost of the people, they walked away to indicate that they are not behind him on that and want to confuse that message, some form of psychological/hypnothizing act to weaken his words/impact in that moment by causing some distraction in the background.

The question is why they did not stand still and calm during that whole episode a bit longer, if it was to show full support then they would have stood there a bit longer you could argue... So was this some form of pinpointed psychological distraction or was it more an act of showing support...

To me they all appeared totally confident the whole time, especially the leader. Therefore I think it was not an accident. I think they had probably been ordered to behave like this. Possible symbolism is that the military is sending the message that the people behind them are powerful enough to mess with both Trump's speech and Trump's plans. So you could from that perspective understand this as a demonstration of who is in charge. But you can also understand it like they were only trying to reach alignment during a short period and then once that had been achieved they just left and it happened to coincide with some rather important things Trump was still talking about.

But something like this by default turns incredibly psychological, the fact that it is difficult to be able to fully understand the thing, results in some degree of confusion and where there is confusion the false is often present.

Another possibility is that they should not have been there, but because Trump has certain military people behind him maybe he had ordered those soldiers to behave like this, while the media is desperately trying to confuse the underlying meaning by saying it was an accident.

So maybe it was on purpose, directed by Trump, for him to get some additional power behind the words at that moment...

https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/01/strange-moment-mr-trumps-inauguration-speech/

[BMJ]

Considering his appointment of Flynn and Mattis and support for the miltary I would agree with Joseph P Farrell.

Quote "Conversely, the message could be very different: same scene, different interpretation: the military walks up behind Mr. Trump and flanks him, in clear view of the assembled presidential neo-cons and neo-libs: message? We've got his back, don't try anything stupid. And in the context of pre-election campaign chatter of countercoups and so on, it seems to fit more closely."

Edit: This was a perfectly timed event. To symbolise the support of the armed forces for "The Don" in front of the likes of the Clintons, Obama's and Bush to name a few.

[Satori]

To me this is nothing more than a miscue by that Honor Troupe of soldiers. Did they return later at the correct appointed time? Even if not, it's still a miscue.

[Cardillac]

as I have posted on the Farrell website (see published video): has anyone not noticed the military man directly behind Trump echoes Trumps words in complete synchronicity with him as Trump speaks them?

check it out-

Larry in Germany

[WhiteLove]

as I have posted on the Farrell website (see published video): has anyone not noticed the military man directly behind Trump echoes Trumps words in complete synchronicity with him as Trump speaks them?

check it out-

Larry in Germany

I have not seen that. Are you able to link to it?

[Matt P]

Larry, wish you'd include a time to see that. I can't find it.
We need a lip reader to know what the one officer said to the others to indicate for them to leave.
I also believe there was some meaning to the military members being there for that specific time in the speech but i didn't think of it when i first watched the speech Friday night. I do remember turning to my wife in amazement because he just called out the criminals sitting directly behind him like no other inauguration speech ever. I couldn't believe it.
Weren't each of the armed force divisions all represented by the men behind him? Perhaps a show of having his back. After watching Trump's speech we watched the inauguration speeches of Obama, Bush 2 and JFK. No military came to stand behind them that i remember.
I doubt this was a stage accident. These things are scripted and secret service would probably not let a group of any people walk right down to the back of the president during such a moment unless it was expected. And Trump didn't flinch, which i think he would have at least paused or looked behind him if it was unexpected.
Matt

sRBsJNdK1t0

[Satori]

Well, if there was any message in this, and I do not believe there is or was, they merely proved themselves to be bumbling stooges. If they were a threat to Trump, he could breath easier. If they were there to support him, he should have been worried.

[Kryztian]

Here are the words Trump uttered while members of U.S. Navy, Airforce, Marines, etc. flanked his back:



“Today’s ceremonial however, has very special meaning. Because today, we are not merely transferring power from one administration to another, or from one party to another, but we are transferring power from Washington D.C. and giving it back to you, the people. For too long, a small group in our nation’s capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost. ”

By themselves, these words are incredible and should make one ask "what is he talking about." The fact that this coincides perfect with the appearance of these military personnel, makes it even stranger.

[Karma Ninja]

I went back over the past 8 inauguration speeches and didn't find one where the military came up behind the President and stood behind him while he was speaking. I highly doubt this was simply a miscue as I would suspect the military would have been well briefed and familiar with their duty on this important day. Additionally I would suspect there would be a few people running things in the background who would have arranged when they were to arrive and exit. The timing of their arrival and the words being spoken are significant. It's an interesting observation and appears to be an anomaly.

Can anyone tell if it is a representative (or two) from all the different forces? I imagine this would have been quite an honour. But strange how they come and go so quickly. Again, I think of the words being spoken as they make their appearance.

It could also simply be that Trump asked them to come out and stand on stage with him at some point and they did it for the first time for Trump. Perhaps he wanted to make a symbolic point or perhaps he made an ego filled request which was originally fulfilled but then pulled off the stage on higher orders? I love to speculate but I guess we'll have to leave it at speculation.

[Flash]

The military are all dressed with a different uniform: marines, army, airforce, etc. This is a show of backing up the president and which military group does.

It is a soft coup that was done papa Bush and followed by Clinton and definitely by Bush II, and now it is a reverse coup it seems. What bothers me is that all Trump cabinet (we call it cabinet in Canada) is mainly Jewish. Does that mean that the military are in cohout with Israel for this? What kind of dealings took place beforehand? With the military, no way Russia was involved in skewing the election. The military were making sure it was not stolen, I bet.

We will see, no other choice for the moment than wait.

And no, Russia has nothing to do with it, the Russia jeopardized our elections lies are just a distraction.


I went back over the past 8 inauguration speeches and didn't find one where the military came up behind the President and stood behind him while he was speaking. I highly doubt this was simply a miscue as I would suspect the military would have been well briefed and familiar with their duty on this important day. Additionally I would suspect there would be a few people running things in the background who would have arranged when they were to arrive and exit. The timing of their arrival and the words being spoken are significant. It's an interesting observation and appears to be an anomaly.

Can anyone tell if it is a representative (or two) from all the different forces? I imagine this would have been quite an honour. But strange how they come and go so quickly. Again, I think of the words being spoken as they make their appearance.

It could also simply be that Trump asked them to come out and stand on stage with him at some point and they did it for the first time for Trump. Perhaps he wanted to make a symbolic point or perhaps he made an ego filled request which was originally fulfilled but then pulled off the stage on higher orders? I love to speculate but I guess we'll have to leave it at speculation.

[Cardillac]

@WhiteLove/mpennery

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4142324/Moment-soldiers-stand-Trump-inaugural-speech.html

stay well!

Larry

[Rhah]

Here are the words Trump uttered while members of U.S. Navy, Airforce, Marines, etc. flanked his back:



“Today’s ceremonial however, has very special meaning. Because today, we are not merely transferring power from one administration to another, or from one party to another, but we are transferring power from Washington D.C. and giving it back to you, the people. For too long, a small group in our nation’s capital has reaped the rewards of government while the people have borne the cost. ”

By themselves, these words are incredible and should make one ask "what is he talking about." The fact that this coincides perfect with the appearance of these military personnel, makes it even stranger.
I agree. And I certainly see some logic behind both Farrell's and WhiteLove's reasoning for this occurrence.

Also, what I immediately noticed happening for me, personally, the first time that I watched it, was that the military men were simply a distraction from the speech, if nothing else. I noticed that I was paying attention more to them than to what Trump was actually saying, and found me having to rewind to video and watch it a second time in order to catch the part of his speech that I had just missed. So if this was aired on live television, I therefore wouldn't doubt that a great number of viewers just "happened to" miss this part of his speech because they were distracted by the strange and unexpected appearance and behavior of this group of military men. And since, like you pointed out, the appearance of the military men coincided with quite an incredible part of his speech, I personally doubt that it was just a mistake.

[Morbid]

never seen previous inauguration before but ive noticed the timing too - found it as not so out of place. i got a feeling that usa have been destined to become more aggressive in terms of military and a certain destiny is selected for its role.. or perhaps its just a strong message from one arm of power to another.

[BMJ]

Considering his appointment of Flynn and Mattis and support for the miltary I would agree with Joseph P Farrell.

Quote "Conversely, the message could be very different: same scene, different interpretation: the military walks up behind Mr. Trump and flanks him, in clear view of the assembled presidential neo-cons and neo-libs: message? We've got his back, don't try anything stupid. And in the context of pre-election campaign chatter of countercoups and so on, it seems to fit more closely."

Edit: This was a perfectly timed event. To symbolise the support of the armed forces for "The Don" in front of the likes of the Clintons, Obama's and Bush to name a few.

The Don wrote on his twitter account, quote:
"I promise that our administration will ALWAYS have your back. We will ALWAYS be with you!"
Link: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump

I think that statement clarifies this issue of symbolism during the inauguration.