The Inside-Out Universe - The Biggest Secret?

[Adam Greenland]

I was just looking through the recent flat earth psyop thread, and while I haven't looked into it much or given the topic much credence, there is a nagging feeling that if you believe in a "simulated" universe, surely there would be a slim possibility the matrix is running like an "open world" computer game which could fit into the whole flat earth scenario?

But it's been a decade or so since I first came across the hollow earth theories, which led me to the inverted earth ideas.

If you type "inverted earth theory" into Google it takes you to a list of hollow earth topics, but no real specific matches to the term. The ideas do pop up on a few websites, but it seems to be the same pages I visited over a decade ago.

Maybe this is simply because the theory is ridiculous?

The basics (of the more recent form of the theories) for those who are not aware is that the whole universe is on the inside of a sphere.
We are walking on the inside wall of the universe.
Basic maths are the same except inverted so everything gets smaller as you approach the middle. The moon and sun are much closer and smaller.
Gravity is actually centrifugal force.
Light travels in circles instead of straight lines and while my physics is not up to speed, this apparently goes a long way to explaining how we perceive the world around us.
There is no real answer to what's outside the sphere, but maybe this is where brane cosmology and the multiverse come into play? Or would this be what it's like if we are the ones on the inside, not outside, of a hollow earth?

Is this a topic that is discussed much and would it change the ideas that we have about being "insignificant" if we were indeed a part of a more Copernican-like cosmos and not a minor speck in someone else's Hubble?

A better explanation of the topic.

https://www.lhup.edu/~dsimanek/hollow/morrow.htm

[CurEus]

Why not? ...we can add it to the "amusing theory" collection

I like the notion that our solar system is just a molecule in a larger collections of molecules of some super enormous organism. Kinda like fractals going smaller or larger.

I hope we don't turn out to be dandruff on some titan's head. :)

[Inversion]

According to The Lost Book of Enki Earth is the bottom half of Tiamat, the planet that was in the orbit of the asteroid belt. If that's the case would Mars or Ceres be the top half? If the story is true maybe the Earth didn't compress back into a sphere via gravity.

[amor]

If we extend from the thought of God, then the Universe is his extrapolation and interpolation. We are a part of his thought process and therefore, the universe is also OUR extrapolation and interpretation.

[CurEus]

According to The Lost Book of Enki Earth is the bottom half of Tiamat, the planet that was in the orbit of the asteroid belt. If that's the case would Mars or Ceres be the top half? If the story is true maybe the Earth didn't compress back into a sphere via gravity.

Would that not be the Kuiper or asteroid belts? The hammered "Bracelet" I believe it was called in the Akkadian texts...
My understanding is that planets and moons generally tend to assume a spherical shape but not from gravity but from electrical interplay with "spin" and torsion. ( Electric universe) But that may only occur when not in a "solid" state??

Phobos, and perhaps others, is an oddball in this respect. I heard, but don't recall where, that earth is not spherical or even remotely round when water is removed. But then again others say the moon was born of the Earth...




¤=[Post Update]=¤

Someone is thinking

34871

[Inversion]

I image a molten object would form into a sphere, but not a cold solidified one. I've heard the Earth being referred to as an oblong oblique. That's an invalid attachment.

http://www.space.com/17638-how-big-is-earth.html

The mean radius of Earth is 3,959 miles (6,371 kilometers). However, Earth is not quite a sphere. The planet's rotation causes it to bulge at the equator. Earth's equatorial diameter is 7,926 miles (12,756 km), but from pole to pole, the diameter is 7,898 miles (12,714 km) — a difference of only 28 miles (42 km).

[Bill Ryan]

I image a molten object would form into a sphere, but not a cold solidified one. I've heard the Earth being referred to as an oblong oblique. That's an invalid attachment.

http://www.space.com/17638-how-big-is-earth.html

The mean radius of Earth is 3,959 miles (6,371 kilometers). However, Earth is not quite a sphere. The planet's rotation causes it to bulge at the equator. Earth's equatorial diameter is 7,926 miles (12,756 km), but from pole to pole, the diameter is 7,898 miles (12,714 km) — a difference of only 28 miles (42 km).

You mean an oblate spheroid. (Please look these things up before you post something nonsensical!)

That's a fancy term for saying it's not exactly spherical. And yes, the difference is 28 miles in 7,926... that's a 'flattening' (OMG, shouldn't use that word! :bigsmile: ) of less than 0.4%.

[waves]

Why not? ...we can add it to the "amusing theory" collection

I like the notion that our solar system is just a molecule in a larger collections of molecules of some super enormous organism. Kinda like fractals going smaller or larger.....

Both directions. I asked a retired 80 year old physicist in my jazz class pretty much that question, whether it was possible that every particle is part of something that can be infinitely unfolded larger or smaller, and his answer was yes. This is the only thing that makes sense to me, I don't see how there could be a last 'smaller' or 'larger' state of a particle given the laws that got them there.

[conk]

Why not? ...we can add it to the "amusing theory" collection

I like the notion that our solar system is just a molecule in a larger collections of molecules of some super enormous organism. Kinda like fractals going smaller or larger.

I hope we don't turn out to be dandruff on some titan's head. :)Or worse, a dingle berry!

[eaglespirit]

If we extend from the thought of God, then the Universe is his extrapolation and interpolation. We are a part of his thought process and therefore, the universe is also OUR extrapolation and interpretation.

Hi Amor, good day to you : ) This one grabbed me!

We are actively, selflessly re-learning to BEcome the extrapolation and interpolation energies as one...flowing through them!

Higher co-creating angels enabling earth metamorphosis out of and from the current chaos upon us...chaos that energizes these personal creative spirit modus operandi!

Humility and gratitude and giving freely are the fuels of unconditional loving changes!