Alec Baldwin admits he's an alien and that they use TV to turn our brains to mush...

[Teakai]

I was listening to a David Icke interview and they mentioned this particular superbowl ad, so I went and looked it up.

Definitely one to share.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVcACKqnjBg

Many a truth is spoken in jest. I think Freud said that.

[xbusymom]

more preparation for disclosure??? and more fear mongering??

[truthseekerdan]

Creepy, I actually seen it on TV -- accidentally...;)

[MorningSong]

Wow! Now that truely is out in the open, isn't it?

[Teakai]

Check out this one. This is a Christmas commercial from 1998 (I think) This would really only have any relevance to those who understand the symbology.
So the average TV viewer likely wouldn't have understood it at all.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K5KDRBzUBJI

[Cate]

msg deleted

[Teakai]

Coincidence , Cate (I know, no such thing as coincidence :) )- I just came here from watching that on you tube.

[Beren]

Everything is on the open. But how many have eyes to see and ears to hear?

[bilko]

A mellon baller eh?
Every self respecting alien knows that a small portable suction device is the preferred method of removal lol.

[Celine]

a straw??

ok ok i know bad/obvious joke

[muxfolder]

Alec is so funny.;)

[shadowstalker]

Everything is on the open. But how many have eyes to see and ears to hear?
True how many good folks are still blind and deaf.

[pilotsimone]

deleted post

[Teakai]

Another alien confession. Sure, it's all fun and games - til somebody loses a ...brain :lol:

*gulp*


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qcc4QRRKns

a-a-a-a-a-and....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-jfrjXrOyc&feature=related

and third times the charm...


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYjnVE6ZXtU&feature=related

[MariaDine]

INDEED !!! :)............:cool::thumb::faint2::pound: so funny !!!

[MiguelQ]

funny but is this a message?

[Loki]

Ill think you will find these commercials as a slight nudge in jest at the growing conspiracy movement .... because they know ... this is exactly what will happen they will be posted up on these sights, you just did them a favor by advertising this to a few more thousand people that don't watch TV, this is not disclosure of anything it's just smart advertising.

OP i think thread title is a bit misleading ... you do know the difference between TV and real life yeah ?? especially with advertising.

They look at trends and panda to that market ... contrary to popular belief there are a lot of smart people in advertising.

[Teakai]

I came across a few very interesting sites yesterday regarding reptillians and reverse speech which led me to an interview yesterday with David Icke interviewing Arizona Wilder.

I was a bit iffy about the whole reptillian thing - but I'm really starting to rethink.

Arizona's story - what I've watched so far - very much resembles Svali's story about ritual abuse within Illuminati familes.

I see the ads as them laughing right in our faces - sort of like Alec Baldwin does in the ad. As Svali says, 'they' simply think that no-one will believe it.
And, for the most part, they'd be right.

Here's part 1 of the interview for anyone whose interested. There are 17 parts - I'm only up to part 6.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eKL12dFt1HI

If this is true - OMG - what a reality switch. It makes me want to laugh out loud in amazement.
Oh my...!!!

[Loki]

Why would advertisement executives have any knowledge of reptilians or anything of that nature ? I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have any type of top secret access what so ever .... You guys really need to think about what your actually saying, because what your implying doesn't make any sense at all. I'm almost 100% sure these guys would not have access to that knowledge in any way shape or form when not even the president of the USA has very much top secret clearance at all.

[Celine]

it is my belief...that more "regular" people, know, then most might realize.


Positions of power dont always sit at the head table...

[Loki]

Well i guess some people will just see a conspiracy in anything whether its there or not ... each to there own i guess.

[Teakai]

Why would advertisement executives have any knowledge of reptilians or anything of that nature ? I'm pretty sure they wouldn't have any type of top secret access what so ever .... You guys really need to think about what your actually saying, because what your implying doesn't make any sense at all. I'm almost 100% sure these guys would not have access to that knowledge in any way shape or form when not even the president of the USA has very much top secret clearance at all.

Hi Loki - maybe you haven't watched what I've watched. I must say - a very convincing argument by seemingly sane people has been put across in regard to reptillians being the underlying force that is manipulating the direction of society.

In regard to the advertising execs - isn't that the same as a media that doesn't give us the news - and we all know that's happening. Does that mean all the journalists are in the know?

And, if you think about it - the advertising execs don't even need to know anything particular to make the ads. They may just be told that the clients want the ad to have evil alien connotations.

Or, the ad making could have been given over to a 'family member'. 'They' have mind manipulated pawns/players all over the place at this stage of the game.

I think there is more than enough evidence now that makes it obvious that the way the world works isn't one bit like we were taught it was or how we thought it was.

"The popular princess (Diana) went so far as to publicly refer to the British House of Windsor as "lizards" and "reptiles." "They're not human," she said."

Source: http://www.rumormillnews.com/DIANA%20WAS%20THE%20TARGET%20REDMAN.htm

[Teakai]

Well i guess some people will just see a conspiracy in anything whether its there or not ... each to there own i guess.

Ah, glasshopper - as others will refuse to see what is right under their noses.
:)

[Loki]

Ah, glasshopper - as others will refuse to see what is right under their noses.
:)

lol its got nothing to do with refusing to see anything. There is definitely manipulation of society happening but I'm quite sure it has nothing to do with reptilian aliens.

I have seen just about everything possible on reptilians and all I see is a huge amount of speculation by a FEW people most of the community doesn't conform to the reptilian theories, what i don't see is one piece of actual evidence on the subject. If you can show me some be my guest. (and no ... posting up speculative documentaries and out of context statements is not evidence)

Have you ever considered the fact that there might not be anything of this nature right under our noses ? just because some one talks about it and makes a few doco's about it doesn't make it automatically true. There is enough actual evidence of other parties manipulating society and they need no help from scary outa space monsters.

If you want to continue with your theory ... provide some evidence that watching TV changes the consistency and molecular structure of brain tissue then some reports of masses of bodies showing up anywhere in the world with their brains removed ... then maybe it could be a plausible idea ... so far i have not witnessed or heard anything on either ?

[Teakai]

lol its got nothing to do with refusing to see anything. There is definitely manipulation of society happening but I'm quite sure it has nothing to do with reptilian aliens.
I have seen just about everything possible on reptilians and all I see is a huge amount of speculation by a FEW people most of the community doesn't conform to the reptilian theories, what i don't see is one piece of actual evidence on the subject. If you can show me some be my guest. (and no ... posting up speculative documentaries and out of context statements is not evidence)

Have you ever considered the fact that there might not be anything of this nature right under our noses ? just because some one talks about it and makes a few doco's about it doesn't make it automatically true. There is enough actual evidence of other parties manipulating society and they need no help from scary outa space monsters.


Yes, I've definitely considered that the reptillian theory might just be a far fetched idea - until I started looking into it.
Now, I’m thinking it’s not so far fetched at all.

Can’t say I’m much surprised that only a few people give the theory any credence – it certainly goes against all we’ve been led to think is real.

And I don't have anything solid to offer up by way of convincing anyone that they exist -only I wonder what evidence you have that makes you so sure they don't?



If you want to continue with your theory ... provide some evidence that watching TV changes the consistency and molecular structure of brain tissue then some reports of masses of bodies showing up anywhere in the world with their brains removed ... then maybe it could be a plausible idea ... so far i have not witnessed or heard anything on either ?

Huh?
I’m not saying the ads are literally factual, Loki.
I don’t think TV actually turns brains into a squishy pulp that you can suck up through a straw.

But TV is able to mass influence people - and lead people to think that the world they see viewed on their TV screen is the real world. Subliminal messaging is still used, which filters through to our subconscious mind having the effect of controlling us.


*According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. had 719558 missing people in 2009.

That's an awful lot of people missing in one country in one year.

[Loki]

But TV is able to mass influence people - and lead people to think that the world they see viewed on their TV screen is the real world. Subliminal messaging is still used, which filters through to our subconscious mind having the effect of controlling us.

Yes we know this, it was figured out in the 1930's possibly before.


And I don't have anything solid to offer up by way of convincing anyone that they exist -only I wonder what evidence you have that makes you so sure they don't?

You answered your own question read the first 17 words of your statement as it applies to everyone ever.


According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. had 719558 missing people in 2009.

That's an awful lot of people missing in one country in one year.

lol that was the amount of reports not the actual amount of people ... you edited the information from the site as it clearly states. (making stuff up or misrepresenting information to prove a point is not cool)

As of December 31, 2009, NCIC contained 96,192 ACTIVE missing person records. Juveniles under the age of 18 account for 44,349 (46.1 percent) of the records and 12,461 (13.0 percent) were for juveniles between the ages of 18 and 20.*

During 2009, 719,558 missing person records were ENTERED into NCIC, a decrease of 7.5 percent from the 778,161 records ENTERED in 2008. Missing Person records cleared or canceled during the same period totaled 726,130 (so there were actually more people removed from the existing system then were actually entered for the entire year). Reasons for these removals include: a law enforcement agency located the subject, the individual returned home, or the record had to be removed by the entering agency due to a determination that the record was invalid.

http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ncic/ncic-missing-person-and-unidentified-person-statistics-for-2009

ACTIVE ENTRIES AS OF 12/31/2009 96,192

TOTAL FILE TRANSACTIONS 1,759,860

ENTRIES 719,558

REMOVED 726,130

[Teakai]

Yes we know this, it was figured out in the 1930's possibly before.


Ye-e-e-e-s, but my reply was in response to your asking me to:


... provide some evidence that watching TV changes the consistency and molecular structure of brain tissue

I was explaining that while not literally turning the brain to mush – TV did impact the brain.



You answered your own question read the first 17 words of your statement as it applies to everyone ever.


How did I?

Surely it depends on what you accept as being evidence. You said you have looked at practically everything in regard to the reptillian theory and have concluded that you are 'sure' it's false.

You base the surety of your stance on a lack of what you deem to be evidence to support reptilian existence.

That is a faulty premise.

Evidence is evidence. Solid evidence is proof? I have no proof, but there is evidence in the testimony of others.




lol that was the amount of reports not the actual amount of people ... you edited the information from the site as it clearly states. (making stuff up or misrepresenting information to prove a point is not cool)


Ah, Glasshopper, what is not cool is to falsely accuse me of something I did not do :)

I just cut and pasted it from google listings and didn’t alter anything at all - though plead guilty to the charge of plagiarism:
http://www.google.com.au/#hl=en&biw=1007&bih=499&q=According+to+the+Federal+Bureau+of+Investigation%2C+the+U.S.+had+719558+missing+people+in+2009.&aq=&aqi=g7&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=&fp=42c33c885e5e233

Wasn’t intending to mislead. It was a passing point that I didn’t think required in depth analysis.
I apologise for the misunderstanding.
(I will explain in advance that I couldn't remember the exact words I used for the search engine the first time round - so just did a cut and past of the comment to locate it this time)

Ammended: According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. had 272 197 missing people in 2009.
That's an awful lot of people missing in one country in one year.

From: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ncic/ncic-missing-person-and-unidentified-person-statistics-for-2009#5

[Mutchie]

I was listening to a David Icke interview and they mentioned this particular superbowl ad, so I went and looked it up.

Definitely one to share.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVcACKqnjBg

Many a truth is spoken in jest. I think Freud said that.

This was a COOL VIDEO its a FACT that TV and the INTERNET is and was used as a tool to feed and soften up the masses to certain subjects !!!

KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK " Total Respect "

[Loki]

Ammended: According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. had 272 197 missing people in 2009.
That's an awful lot of people missing in one country in one year.

From: http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ncic/ncic-missing-person-and-unidentified-person-statistics-for-2009#5


LOL you did it again you doubled (almost tripled) the actual amount its one of the first lines on the exact page you linked and which I provided before As of December 31, 2009, NCIC contained 96,192 active missing person records. Your not even reading the article you posted your just copy and pasting excerpts that prove your point ... thats twice now ... if your not even going to research your own argument properly ... I dunno what else to do ?? Clearly the truth is not what your searching for ... your only searching for things that prove your point ... even if you have to make them up multiple times in a row.



You base the surety of your stance on a lack of what you deem to be evidence to support reptilian existence.

That is a faulty premise. Evidence is evidence. Solid evidence is proof? I have no proof, but there is evidence in the testimony of others.

Ok a premise is a proposition upon which an argument is based or from which a conclusion is drawn. So your trying to tell me that the absolute lack of evidence at all ... beside 1 or 2 people talking about second hand accounts is a faulty premise or a faulty proposition to base and argument upon ???? ... really ... wow I don't even know what to say to that I can only assume you don't actually know the meaning of the words you are using ?



Wasn’t intending to mislead.

What ?? if your not intending to mislead people wouldn't you have at least researched passed the first link on Google ? and cross referenced your information with another source ? it doesn't help your case that even your amended statistic is wrong also ... and the right answer is actually on the page you linked which conveniently skipped past the correct information which i have previously linked. Thats not falsely accusing you of doing something you didn't do thats plainly showing people that you have now done it twice in as many posts.

And also nowhere on the entire page is the sentence "According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. had 719558 missing people in 2009" so its definitely not a copy and past from the site as you also claimed.

[Teakai]

LOL you did it again you doubled (almost tripled) the actual amount its one of the first lines on the exact page you linked and which I provided before As of December 31, 2009, NCIC contained 96,192 active missing person records. Your not even reading the article you posted your just copy and pasting excerpts that prove your point ... thats twice now ... if your not even going to research your own argument properly ... I dunno what else to do ?? Clearly the truth is not what your searching for ... your only searching for things that prove your point ... even if you have to make them up multiple times in a row.
.

I just got the numbers from NCIC MISSING PERSON FILE—YEARLY TOTALS AND PERCENT CHANGE.
It reads:

Year – 1999 File trans – 1,733,691 Record entered 867,129 Record removed – 866,562

Clears – 816,195 Locates – 38,704 Modified – 272,197

It seems to me that the modified number of missing people is 272,197


I read the numbers you posted and they didn’t seem to tell me much at all by way of the final total.
But, you tell me how just how many missing people there were in 2009 and I will likely say – that’s a lot of people to go missing in one country in one year.



Ok a premise is a proposition upon which an argument is based or from which a conclusion is drawn. So your trying to tell me that the absolute lack of evidence at all ... beside 1 or 2 people talking about second hand accounts is a faulty premise or a faulty proposition to base and argument upon ???? ... really ... wow I don't even know what to say to that I can only assume you don't actually know the meaning of the words you are using ?
.

Basically, I’m asking you how you can be sure of your conclusion that reptillains don’t exist.

So... how can you be sure reptilians don’t exist?






And also nowhere on the entire page is the sentence "According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the U.S. had 719558 missing people in 2009" so its definitely not a copy and past from the site as you also claimed.

Yes it does. 6th down under the heading: Miss Indian USA/
Ask.com encyclopedia

Bit of a waste of time – but there you have it. By the way, just to beat you to it – the forward slash I put after USA is really a straight up and down stroke on google only I couldn’t replicate it with my keyboard :lol:




What ?? if your not intending to mislead people wouldn't you have at least researched passed the first link on Google ? and cross referenced your information with another source ? it doesn't help your case that even your amended statistic is wrong also ... and the right answer is actually on the page you linked which conveniently skipped past the correct information which i have previously linked. Thats not falsely accusing you of doing something you didn't do thats plainly showing people that you have now done it twice in as many posts.

Not at all.
I didn’t think for a minute that the number of missing people would prove or be evidence of anything, so didn’t bother too hard with it. It was just a passing point that may have some relevance – or may not.

I put it up as a matter of interest to you asking to be shown evidence of people turning up with their brain missing – well, these are people not showing up at all.

It seems to be you are focusing on something perfectly irrelevant to try and make some sort of point.

Believe me (if you will) I have absolutely no interest in twisting your arm or trying to convince you in any way about the existence of reptilians.
You have a brain, you know how to use it – I shall give you the credit of being capable of forming your own conclusion.

Though I am interested as to what you came across to make you so sure about that conclusion.

[Loki]

Yes it does. 6th down under the heading: Miss Indian USA/
Ask.com encyclopedia

Sorry my bad, forgive me for assuming you used the FBI website for FBI statistic's, i would have never imagined in a million years that some one would copy directly from the google search page under the title Miss Indian USA/Ask.com


I just got the numbers from NCIC MISSING PERSON FILE—YEARLY TOTALS AND PERCENT CHANGE.
It reads:

Year – 1999 File trans – 1,733,691 Record entered 867,129 Record removed – 866,562

Clears – 816,195 Locates – 38,704 Modified – 272,197

It seems to me that the modified number of missing people is 272,197


I read the numbers you posted and they didn’t seem to tell me much at all by way of the final total.
But, you tell me how just how many missing people there were in 2009 and I will likely say – that’s a lot of people to go missing in one country in one year.

Lol now your posting the info from 1999 not 2009 ... wow ... what can I say, lol if you read my numbers you would have know that that WAS the final total ... so how is it even remotely imaginable that you couldn't get the final total from the .... wait for it ....... final total ????????

at this point i would have to assume your trolling ?? no one could mess up this bad so many times in a row ???

the only thing fitting this response is my all time favorite quote

"What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

I never usually talk to people on forums like this ... but man my god ... I cant believe what I am reading here.

[Scott]

Loki your tactics are becoming obvious now ;p

[Teakai]

Sorry my bad, forgive me for assuming you used the FBI website for FBI statistic's, i would have never imagined in a million years that some one would copy directly from the google search page under the title Miss Indian USA/Ask.com


Forgiven.
Never gave it a second thought :)



Lol now your posting the info from 1999 not 2009 ... wow ... what can I say, lol if you read my numbers you would have know that that WAS the final total ... so how is it even remotely imaginable that you couldn't get the final total from the .... wait for it ....... final total ????????


:lol: Did I? Ok now I’ll beg your forgivness.
I found that site a total pain – it took ages for the page to move down, and then when it started it kept going.
Then when it did change direction – it kept going.

It was through sheer perseverance that I managed to post anything from it.

Seriously, though - just tell it to me straight, give me the number - what was the final total?



at this point i would have to assume your trolling ?? no one could mess up this bad so many times in a row ???

the only thing fitting this response is my all time favorite quote

"What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul."

I never usually talk to people on forums like this ... but man my god ... I cant believe what I am reading here.

And following on with your assumption – who would you assume I’m trolling, and for what purpose?
(P.S. - I stuff up way more than that - that's nothing. Are you a Libran by any chance?)




I never usually talk to people on forums like this ... but man my god ... I cant believe what I am reading here.

Well, while you’re privileging me with your responses, Loki – any chance of answering the question : So... how can you be sure reptilians don’t exist?

No pressure.
But, judging by some of your responses (but man my god ... I cant believe what I am reading here) - and that quote you found so appropriate, well, I’m guessing reptilian existence might rate wa-a-a-ay outside your credibility threshold.
;)

[Loki]

Forgiven.
Never gave it a second thought :)



:lol: Did I? Ok now I’ll beg your forgivness.
I found that site a total pain – it took ages for the page to move down, and then when it started it kept going.
Then when it did change direction – it kept going.

It was through sheer perseverance that I managed to post anything from it.

Seriously, though - just tell it to me straight, give me the number - what was the final total?

I have already written it in 2 posts and it is even underlined and bolded ... some of which you actually quoted ... are you actually reading this thread ??




And following on with your assumption – who would you assume I’m trolling, and for what purpose?
(P.S. - I stuff up way more than that - that's nothing. Are you a Libran by any chance?)


I would assume your trolling from your responses, you keep asking me for things I have posted, you keep linking the wrong information from a site that is easy to read, you keep asking the same questions over and over again that have have already previously answered, your making things up, your deliberately misquoting, excessive smiley faces for no reason, asking questions with no relevance to the actual debate, using words you do not understand and trying to base arguments off them, linking wrong information from nonsense sites without putting the slightest effort into researching your argument and not even reading the info on your own links ... need I go on ?




Well, while you’re privileging me with your responses, Loki – any chance of answering the question : So... how can you be sure reptilians don’t exist?

No pressure.

and you wonder why I think your trolling ?

I never said they didn't exist not even once. Please show me where I said this even once please. This is like the third time you have completely made something up in the argument and its getting intellectually frustrating.



But, judging by some of your responses (but man my god ... I cant believe what I am reading here) - and that quote you found so appropriate, well, I’m guessing reptilian existence might rate wa-a-a-ay outside your credibility threshold.
;)

Dude ... I am speechless how can you possibly fathom this from my responses, you quoted a statement I made twice in 2 different context one on top of the other ??? really ??? wow, I don't know what the point of this argument is if your not actually reading my responses and then replying with nonsense and gibberish and things you have made up, TBH I cant think of anything nice to say anymore. I think it will just be easier to steer clear of your posts and threads because if this is the caliber of your intellectual process I think I'm just going to walk away and wash my hands rather then argue against these kinds of responses. I'm quite sure my 4 year old niece would provide a more intellectually complex debate then this.

I would expect these kind of responses and level of research to come from some one maybe 12-14 ... that I could understand ... but you have been on earth for 46 years according to your profile (yeah I checked to make sure I wasn't debating against a young teenager) I cant even wrap my head around this ... How can these responses possibly be the culmination of 46 years of experiences and intellect.

[Beth]

Alright, back on topic. You two can continue the back and forth in PM, or I'll just close the thread.

[Teakai]

I never said they didn't exist not even once. Please show me where I said this even once please. This is like the third time you have completely made something up in the argument and its getting intellectually frustrating.




lol its got nothing to do with refusing to see anything. There is definitely manipulation of society happening but I'm quite sure it has nothing to do with reptilian aliens.

What makes you so sure?

[Teakai]

I have already written it in 2 posts and it is even underlined and bolded ... some of which you actually quoted ... are you actually reading this thread ??


Wouldn't it have just been easier to give me the number ?
I did read your posts - call me thick if you like, but I still didn't get a final total out of what you posted.

[Teakai]

I have already written it in 2 posts and it is even underlined and bolded ... some of which you actually quoted ... are you actually reading this thread ??


Wouldn't it have just been easier to give me the number ?
I did read your posts - call me thick if you like, but I still didn't get a final total out of what you posted.

Edit to ad

Ah, OK, I've done got it figured. The underlined total you've given is the grand total of missing persons up to and including 2009.

I was looking for just the figure for 2009.

Never fear, I shall not puff and blow about how intellectually defunct you are, these things happen. :lol:

BTW - the smileys and the laughs I put in are for a reason.

Our discussion reminds me somewhat of this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MsbvGmLaU4&feature=related

I'm thinking you probably won't see the humour.
:)