Study reveals substantial evidence of holographic universe

[Clear Light]

PHYS.ORG (January 30, 2017) : Study reveals substantial evidence of holographic universe (https://phys.org/news/2017-01-reveals-substantial-evidence-holographic-universe.html)


https://3c1703fe8d.site.internapcdn.net/newman/csz/news/800/2017/4-studyreveals.jpg
[A sketch of the timeline of the holographic Universe. Time runs from left to right. The far left denotes the holographic phase and the image is blurry because space and time are not yet well defined. At the end of this phase (denoted by the black fluctuating ellipse) the Universe enters a geometric phase, which can now be described by Einstein's equations. The cosmic microwave background was emitted about 375,000 years later. Patterns imprinted in it carry information about the very early Universe and seed the development of structures of stars and galaxies in the late time Universe (far right). Credit: Paul McFadden]


A UK, Canadian and Italian study has provided what researchers believe is the first observational evidence that our universe could be a vast and complex hologram.

Theoretical physicists and astrophysicists, investigating irregularities in the cosmic microwave background (the 'afterglow' of the Big Bang), have found there is substantial evidence supporting a holographic explanation of the universe—in fact, as much as there is for the traditional explanation of these irregularities using the theory of cosmic inflation.

The researchers, from the University of Southampton (UK), University of Waterloo (Canada), Perimeter Institute (Canada), INFN, Lecce (Italy) and the University of Salento (Italy), have published findings in the journal Physical Review Letters.

A holographic universe, an idea first suggested in the 1990s, is one where all the information that makes up our 3-D 'reality' (plus time) is contained in a 2-D surface on its boundaries.

Professor Kostas Skenderis of Mathematical Sciences at the University of Southampton explains: "Imagine that everything you see, feel and hear in three dimensions (and your perception of time) in fact emanates from a flat two-dimensional field. The idea is similar to that of ordinary holograms where a three-dimensional image is encoded in a two-dimensional surface, such as in the hologram on a credit card. However, this time, the entire universe is encoded."

Although not an example with holographic properties, it could be thought of as rather like watching a 3-D film in a cinema. We see the pictures as having height, width and crucially, depth—when in fact it all originates from a flat 2-D screen. The difference, in our 3-D universe, is that we can touch objects and the 'projection' is 'real' from our perspective.

In recent decades, advances in telescopes and sensing equipment have allowed scientists to detect a vast amount of data hidden in the 'white noise' or microwaves (partly responsible for the random black and white dots you see on an un-tuned TV) left over from the moment the universe was created. Using this information, the team were able to make complex comparisons between networks of features in the data and quantum field theory. They found that some of the simplest quantum field theories could explain nearly all cosmological observations of the early universe.

Professor Skenderis comments: "Holography is a huge leap forward in the way we think about the structure and creation of the universe. Einstein's theory of general relativity explains almost everything large scale in the universe very well, but starts to unravel when examining its origins and mechanisms at quantum level. Scientists have been working for decades to combine Einstein's theory of gravity and quantum theory. Some believe the concept of a holographic universe has the potential to reconcile the two. I hope our research takes us another step towards this."

The scientists now hope their study will open the door to further our understanding of the early universe and explain how space and time emerged.

An open access copy of the paper can be found here (January 4, 2017) : From Planck data to Planck era:
Observational tests of Holographic Cosmology (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1607.04878v2.pdf)


We test a class of holographic models for the very early universe against cosmological observations and find that they are competitive to the standard ΛCDM model of cosmology. These models are based on three dimensional perturbative super-renormalizable Quantum Field Theory (QFT), and while they predict a different power spectrum from the standard power-law used in ΛCDM, they still provide an excellent fit to data (within their regime of validity)

[OMG]

This book trilogy offered compelling evidence of this idea http://www.my-big-toe.com

https://m.youtube.com/user/twcjr44

[joeecho]

Can a holograph discover it's a hologram without that also being a hologram?

http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa65/EvilSexyE/rabbit_hole.jpg

Holographic principles are a modern scientific interpretation of what mystical writings have eluded to long ago.

[boutreality]

Physical reality has running through it several overlapping effects -some of which are holographic- each delivered by its own set of weapons, one source for a class of these weapon's holographic effects (that yield results in physical space-time) is in a second void-space dimension that houses emanating/hologram projecting objects.

Source objects are also well hidden on this planet (deep-sea; deep underground; out of phase), effect delivery components are each resonant to their corresponding source structures and can be out-of-phase or inter-dimensional. Many of these structures work together to form a conduit for delivery and different stages of the same array are in deep space. Specifically, in terms of these weapons, Dark Matter galaxies are "supply stores".

Holographic "encouragement" of physical space time, where holograms are projected to represent the next position of molecules in a physical structure, wherein each molecule of the object then assumes this holographic imprint in space-time is a process used for propulsion and locomotion for some of the technologies at play.

All these many, many overlapping systems contain and attack every individual, this is the reality of an ongoing war that has lasted for eons, -before this solar system existed.
Scientists are subjected to these same constructs, and its always in place, even while they work up their arguments and make supporting observations.

More than anything, I see the "Holographic Universe is valid science" meme gaining ground to encourage the conclusion, on some level of unspoken inner processing, that moral relativism can "justify" acts of outright evil, like pedophilia.

I go into detail on what these structures are and how their attacks are delivered in many of my threads, a decent overview with an introductory conceptual frame is here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?92604-NAZIS-NWO-the-NEW-AGE

Or, for an example of a few of these systems:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?95534-Weaponized-Interdimensional-Space-Time-Chakras-Kundalini-Etc.

"Well nothin' ever went quite exactly as we'd planned, our ideas held no water but we used 'em like a dam." -"Missed the Boat" by Modest Mouse

[Clear Light]

Can a holograph discover it's a hologram without that also being a hologram?

http://i203.photobucket.com/albums/aa65/EvilSexyE/rabbit_hole.jpg

Holographic principles are a modern scientific interpretation of what mystical writings have eluded to long ago.

Oh, yes, and on that note (Mystics / the light of consciousness) I don't see any reason why we can't extrapolate and infer that those "beings" that have realised the "Body of Light" have indeed discovered their "true condition" is so-called "Light" eh ? :)



http://soonyata.home.xs4all.nl/Soruba%20samadhi/achuk-rainbow-body-2.jpg

http://soonyata.home.xs4all.nl/Soruba%20samadhi/16thkarmapa_rainbowbody.jpg

The above two images from : Rainbow Body (http://soonyata.home.xs4all.nl/sorubasamadhi.htm)

[Justplain]

All matter is energy, all energy is sourced from light. Therefore the universe is a light show. If you wanna call it haulographic, thats just a description.

I also once read a research paper (which i cant find now) that indicated patterns in the cosmic background radiation show a repeating sequence that display a recurring big bang. This might support the expansion followed by contraction theory of cosmology. One thing is for sure, this process is more complex and involved then is dreamt of in current philosophies in science.

[boutreality]

A photon is the unit of light, which is a piece of matter, not in itself the source of matter; a photon is but one wave/particle/unit emanated by a star that bounces off physical mass, though our beings do resonate at a frequency that is about (not exactly) half of light, this is not the level of the physical body and is not to be assumed as "the source", in and of itself, of our being or all matter

Justplain, I agree the answer is not "dreamt of in current philosophies in science" and this post is not meant as opposition to yours (post 6), just an added consideration, since a statement that starts with "All matter..." has far reaching implications in terms of physics.

[Justplain]

Hi Boutreality, the photonic nature of light is part of the grand paradox of matter/energy. As you know, all matter is a wavicle, all are a wave, and Einstein's energy equation e=mc2 has a great kernel of truth, though i understand its incomplete. Light forms a fundamental component in matter/energy in this universe. So, i believe its not bereft of truth to say it is a light show. At higher levels of vibration, our bodies are described as being composed of various layers of light. I have heard it said that love is the light that binds us to the Source. I have also heard that if you could hear this light show it would sound like a mother singing a love song to her child.

[boutreality]

Correct, I never stated an issue with the term "light show", there are damaging light shows- like all iterations of New Age that include any notion of light.
If you have seen my other threads it might become clear why what I am seeking to avoid is more New Age victims.

I wrote up my interpretation of Einstein's "flaw" in the Science forum here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?90925-The-Unified-Field

-What it boils down to in the end is the sort of intellectual arrogance required for a physicist to attempt to unify the field without regarding his/her role as part of it.

It is likely of value to note last year's interview between KC and Richard Alan Miller and his claim that upwards of 30% of what are called legitimate scientific findings are "bought and paid for" and because of this they are given preferential treatment (popularized), even if they serve as alternates to accepted norms.

[Clear Light]

Correct, I never stated an issue with the term "light show", there are damaging light shows- like all iterations of New Age that include any notion of light.
If you have seen my other threads it might become clear why what I am seeking to avoid is more New Age victims.

I wrote up my interpretation of Einstein's "flaw" in the Science forum here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?90925-The-Unified-Field

-What it boils down to in the end is the sort of intellectual arrogance required for a physicist to attempt to unify the field without regarding his/her role as part of it.

It is likely of value to note last year's interview between KC and Richard Alan Miller and his claim that upwards of 30% of what are called legitimate scientific findings are "bought and paid for" and because of this they are given preferential treatment (popularized), even if they serve as alternates to accepted norms.

Ah, yes exactly that ! Because, IMHO, the "nature of the Observer" (of the Physicist) is taken as a "Given Fact" (in Traditional Physics) whereas in Quantum Theory even the "Reality" of the "Observer" itself is brought into question too eh ? :wink:

And as such I doubt it is possible for some sort of "Unification Theory" because the two "systems of thought" are like worlds apart in their fundamental assumptions (position) !

[Cidersomerset]

http://news.sky.com/images/sky-news-logo.png


The universe could be a 'vast and complex hologram', scientists say

Researchers investigating the Big Bang's "afterglow" say evidence of a holographic
universe matches other theories in strength.

http://e3.365dm.com/17/01/206x116/b7348d1cf46872c89abedb12f3d0e0d1492b34e4aa3ff7445cdb0d677a88e4e4_3880940.jpg
Slovakia's High Tatras mountains. Are they real, or a hologram?

‘The universe could turn out to be a “vast and complex hologram”, meaning that life in
3D is an illusion, astrophysicists have said.Researchers from the University of
Southampton, working with colleagues from Canada and Italy, say they have found
substantial evidence of a holographic universe – an idea first suggested in the 1990s.
They reached their conclusion after investigating irregularities in the cosmic microwave
background – otherwise known as the “afterglow” of the Big Bang.Evidence for the
theory matches more traditional explanations in strength, they have said. Thus, what
we think of as our 3D world may be an illusion.’Professor of mathematical sciences at
Southampton, Kostas Skenderis, said it was similar to watching a 3D film in the cinema.
While we perceive the pictures as having height, width and depth, they do in fact come
from a flat screen.
http://e3.365dm.com/17/01/206x155/da4b98563d21bf2fec06524cb07d14dfd66ec4316809454313be50c82c446cf9_3880983.jpg
Are these stargazers looking at a 2D image, or one in 3D?

In a 3D universe, Professor Skenderis said, the difference is that we are able to touch
objects, and the "projection" appears to be "real", even though it could be an illusion.
He also compared the idea to the "hologram on a credit card ... however, this time, the
entire universe is encoded".

"Holography is a huge leap forward in the way we think about the structure and creation
of the universe," Professor Skenderis added.

"Einstein's theory of general relativity explains almost everything large scale in the
universe very well, but starts to unravel when examining its origins and mechanisms at
quantum level.

"Scientists have been working for decades to combine Einstein's theory of gravity and
quantum theory.

"Some believe the concept of a holographic universe has the potential to reconcile the two.

"I hope our research takes us another step towards this."


http://news.sky.com/story/the-universe-could-be-a-vast-and-complex-hologram-scientists-say-10749010


====================================================
====================================================

David Icke is mad, right? Scientists say universe could be a hologram - just like he has long said it is

David Icke – The Holographic Illusion of Reality – speaking more than a decade ago

QvR-sgL70l8

====================================================
====================================================

https://www.sciencedaily.com/images/sd-logo.png


Substantial evidence of holographic universe

Date:January 30, 2017

Source:University of Southampton

Summary:A UK, Canadian and Italian study has provided what researchers believe is
the first observational evidence that our universe could be a vast and complex
hologram. Theoretical physicists and astrophysicists, investigating irregularities in the
cosmic microwave background (the 'afterglow' of the Big Bang), have found there is
substantial evidence supporting a holographic explanation of the universe -- in fact, as
much as there is for the traditional explanation of these irregularities using the theory of
cosmic inflation.


https://images.sciencedaily.com/2017/01/170130083231_1_540x360.jpg

A sketch of the timeline of the holographic Universe. Time runs from left to right. The
far left denotes the holographic phase and the image is blurry because space and time
are not yet well defined. At the end of this phase (denoted by the black fluctuating
ellipse) the Universe enters a geometric phase, which can now be described by
Einstein's equations. The cosmic microwave background was emitted about 375,000
years later. Patterns imprinted in it carry information about the very early Universe and
seed the development of structures of stars and galaxies in the late time Universe (far right).

Credit: Paul McFadden


https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170130083231.htm

==================================================
==================================================

David Icke-Decoding the matrix, the body computer and the holographic universe.

xzRUJIpPufs

[Cidersomerset]

NASA Scientist "The Universe Is A Digital Hologram &
May Have Been Designed By Extraterrestrials!"

58m4bcYLmWE

Published on 7 Dec 2016


Richard Terrile – The Universe as a Simulation

tOLlroyYxRg

Published on 23 Sep 2015


====================================================
====================================================
====================================================

RT NEWS.....

Stardust melody: Humans are undeniably made up of cosmic dust, new study confirms

Published time: 16 Jan, 2017 03:24

Stardust melody: Humans are undeniably made up of cosmic dust, new study confirms

https://www.davidicke.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/587c25c8c36188a5188b45aa.jpg
New research has confirmed what scientists have been saying for years: humans
are undeniably made of stardust.

A team of astronomers from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey in New Mexico enlisted
the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) which uses
infrared wavelengths to see through the galaxy's dust and analyze the composition
of 150,000 stars across the Milky Way.With that data, the group then cataloged the
abundance of ‘CHNOPS’ (carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorous and
sulfur) elements in each of the stars, which they say represent the “building blocks”
of the world around us, and found humans and their galaxy have about 97 percent
of the same kind of atoms.

"This instrument collects light in the near-infrared part of the electromagnetic
spectrum and disperses it, like a prism, to reveal signatures of different elements in
the atmospheres of stars," a Sloan spokesperson said in a statement.

https://img.rt.com/files/2017.01/original/587c263ec461881e3e8b4624.jpg
Dana Berry/SkyWorks Digital Inc.; SDSS collaboration © sdss.org

The team used a spectroscopy method to evaluate each element and determine
what it was made of, discovering a distinct wavelength of light from within each star.

Researchers found a stronger concentration of the elements of life in the Milky
Way’s center and discovered that while we share most elements with stars,
humans’ mass is 65 percent oxygen, in contrast to the less than 1 percent
measured in space.

https://www.rt.com/viral/373781-star-dust-humans-study/?utm_source=browser&utm_medium=aplication_chrome&utm_campaign=chrome

====================================================
====================================================
====================================================

Recent article ....

http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/3.20.5/orb/4/img/bbc-blocks-dark.png

Scientists find 'oldest human ancestor'

By Pallab Ghosh
Science correspondent, BBC News
30 January 2017

http://ichef.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/30EF/production/_93872521_pic.jpg
Artist’s reconstruction of Saccorhytus coronarius, based on the original fossil finds.
The actual creature was probably no more than a millimetre in size

Researchers have discovered the earliest known ancestor of humans - along with a
vast range of other species. They say that fossilised traces of the 540-million-year-
old creature are "exquisitely well preserved".The microscopic sea animal is the
earliest known step on the evolutionary path that led to fish and - eventually - to humans.

Read more...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-38800987

[Cidersomerset]

Holographic Reality Do we live in a Computer Simulation? Evidence Says Yes!

mQyHEDtV3BQ

Published on 20 May 2016


Is there such a thing as Free Will? What is Simulated Reality? Does God see things
as Good and Evil? What is the purpose of Life?What is consciousness? Where is it?
What is the Soul? Alternative Realities, Multiple Universe Theory, Quantum Physics,
Quantum Entanglement, String Theory, M-Theory, Time Travel, Glitches in the matrix.
Rewriting the code and going full Neo. Transhumanism, Much


====================================================
====================================================

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/sitelogos/logo_mol.gif


Are we living in a HOLOGRAM? Physicists say they have 'substantial
evidence' our universe is an illusion
Holographic principle claims gravity comes from thin, vibrating strings
These strings are holograms of events that take place in a flatter cosmos
Everything we experience can be described as events in this flatter location
The researchers from the University of Southampton claim there is as much
evidence for this theory as for traditional explanations for these irregularities

By Ellie Zolfagharifard for MailOnline and Pa

Published: 14:19, 30 January 2017 | Updated: 08:39, 31 January 2017


The universe could be a 'vast and complex hologram' and our perception of life
in 3D may only be an illusion.That's according to a group of theoretical physicists
who have been investigating irregularities in the 'afterglow' of the Big Bang.
They say they have found 'substantial evidence' to support the idea of a
holographic universe that will transform our knowledge of the entire universe.


http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2013/12/12/article-2522482-1A0DD7E200000578-604_634x467.jpg

The holographic model suggests gravity in the universe comes from thin, vibrating
strings. These strings are holograms of events that take place in a simpler, flatter cosmos

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4171700/Are-living-HOLOGRAM.html#ixzz4XMNmccvv
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



=================================================
=================================================
=================================================

[boutreality]

The title of my thread is The "Unified" Field -in quotes.

[Cidersomerset]

You are a Simulation & Physics Can Prove It: George Smoot at TEDxSalford

Chfoo9NBEow

Published on 11 Feb 2014

Astrophysicist, cosmologist and Nobel Prize winner George Smoot studies the
cosmic microwave background radiation — the afterglow of the Big Bang. His
pioneering research into deep space and time is uncovering the structure of
the universe itself. He has also made a cameo appearance (as himself) in an
episode of the 'Big Bang Theory.'

George Smoot looks into the farthest reaches of space to the oldest objects in
the known universe: fluctuations in the remnants of creation. Using data
collected from satellites such as COBE and WMAP, scanning the cosmic microwave
background radiation (a relic of the heat unleashed after the Big Bang), he probes
the shape of the universe. In 1992 he and his Berkeley team discovered that the
universe, once thought to be smooth and uniform at the largest scale, is actually
anisotropic — or varied and lumpy. Smoot continues to investigate of the structure
of the universe at the University of California at Berkeley, mapping billions of galaxies
and filaments of dark matter in hope of uncovering the secrets of the universe's origins.

[Justplain]

Hi Clearlight and Boutreality, since you both seem more dialed into to physics theory than i, do either/both of you have any opinions on Brandenburg's G.E.M. theory?:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875389211005876

Apparently Dr. Brandenburg introduces a quantum component to the relativity model with promising results.

[Cidersomerset]

Q.Psience Project: Jill Hanson with Tom Campbell and Jim Elvidge

NSnD0AEpXgM

Published on 14 Jan 2017
In this excellent and enlightening interview, Jill Hanson talks with Tom Campbell
and Jim Eldridge on the concept of virtual reality and the momentum it is gaining
in the science community!

Tom also discusses his new physics experiments that will further demonstrate we
live in a virtual reality.

http://www.mybigtoe.com Tom Campbell's website
http://www.mbtevents.com Tom's appearances in 2017 on the future events page.
The Cultural Connection Tour 2017.

[Clear Light]

Hi Clearlight and Boutreality, since you both seem more dialed into to physics theory than i, do either/both of you have any opinions on Brandenburg's G.E.M. theory?:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875389211005876

Apparently Dr. Brandenburg introduces a quantum component to the relativity model with promising results.

Oh, no, sorry I don't know anything about that !

My interest with Quantum Physics vs Traditional Physics, to tell a story lol, began some years ago after what I can only describe as a series of Mystical experiences which led me to question (explore) who I was, the nature of consciousness, God, Buddha and various other Esoteric Traditions and Mysteries.

Who I believed I was turned out to be nothing more than a mental construction (the false self) because I found at my heart, so to speak, my real condition or true nature.

Thus even though it seems I am physically embodied in some way, this is far from the whole picture !

Now as I highlighted above, the reason why I doubt there will ever be a reconciliation between the two fields of physics is because the latter still regards everything it observes (and measures) from the position of an individual, that is, the physicist believes he / she is a separate entity within the Universe but, I would suggest, that model excludes the possibility that the nature of conscious awareness itself is involved, a prioi, and thus colours all of their Conclusions and Theories.

Perhaps you've heard of Non Duality ? Well, if you care to look, you'll find the ongoing Enlightenment and Related Matters (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?860-Enlightenment-and-related-matters) thread, explains from many different angles, how the assumption of Individuality is itself questionable, and that it can be broken down with techniques such as self-inquiry and meditation (of various flavours) to deconstruct our notions of separateness and self-identity ...

Therefore while seemingly valid in day-to-day life, Traditional Physics is missing the point that the Observer itself is not as Permanent as some would like to believe !!! :)

[Justplain]

Hi Clearlight and Boutreality, since you both seem more dialed into to physics theory than i, do either/both of you have any opinions on Brandenburg's G.E.M. theory?:

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1875389211005876

Apparently Dr. Brandenburg introduces a quantum component to the relativity model with promising results.

Oh, no, sorry I don't know anything about that !

My interest with Quantum Physics vs Traditional Physics, to tell a story lol, began some years ago after what I can only describe as a series of Mystical experiences which led me to question (explore) who I was, the nature of consciousness, God, Buddha and various other Esoteric Traditions and Mysteries.

Who I believed I was turned out to be nothing more than a mental construction (the false self) because I found at my heart, so to speak, my real condition or true nature.

Thus even though it seems I am physically embodied in some way, this is far from the whole picture !

Now as I highlighted above, the reason why I doubt there will ever be a reconciliation between the two fields of physics is because the latter still regards everything it observes (and measures) from the position of an individual, that is, the physicist believes he / she is a separate entity within the Universe but, I would suggest, that model excludes the possibility that the nature of conscious awareness itself is involved, a prioi, and thus colours all of their Conclusions and Theories.

Perhaps you've heard of Non Duality ? Well, if you care to look, you'll find the ongoing Enlightenment and Related Matters (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?860-Enlightenment-and-related-matters) thread, explains from many different angles, how the assumption of Individuality is itself questionable, and that it can be broken down with techniques such as self-inquiry and meditation (of various flavours) to deconstruct our notions of separateness and self-identity ...

Therefore while seemingly valid in day-to-day life, Traditional Physics is missing the point that the Observer itself is not as Permanent as some would like to believe !!! :)

Hi Clearlight, i agree wholeheartedly that classical physics lacks the objectivity it claims. Wayne Wirs has a good take on this:

There is a common assumption that the brain generates consciousness. But there is no evidence of this. The idea that the brain creates consciousness is a belief . It's an assumption. Indeed, the evidence points to just the opposite. That the brain requires consciousness in order to function. Some of the world's most respected neuroscientists and physicists have said as much. That the brain is only a "temporary physical expression" of a consciousness. That consciousness doesn't need a body to function. Among them: Wilder Penfield, one of the pioneers of neurosurgery. He is best known for mapping the functions of the various regions of the brain. Nobel prize winner Sir John Eccles, an Australian neurophysiologist andphilosopher. Neurophysiologist and pathologist Sir Charles Sherrington, another Nobel prize winner. Brian Josephson, Nobel laureate and professor emeritus of physics at the University of Cambridge These aren't conspiracy theorists. They aren't crackpots. Most are Nobel prize winners. These are some seriously smart people. Granted, the idea that consciousness can exist without a brain is hard to grasp, but it has been proven repeatedly. Simply put, consciousness does not need matter to exist, but matter needs consciousness. The famous two-slit experiment demonstrates this quite clearly. In the experiment, a "photon gun" shoots a single photon toward a barrier with two slits cut into it. Behind the slits is a wall of sensors. These sensors tell the researchers where the photon strikes—where it ends up. You would expect the photon, being a single light particle, to act like a bullet. You would expect it to pass through only one of the slits. But that's not what happens. The single photon somehow passes through both slits, but then only strikes the wall in one spot. Repeated firings of photons creates an interference pattern on the back wall. This pattern is identical to the pattern a wave passing through both slits would create. Strange but true. A single photon is fired from the gun. It de-manifests from physical reality and becomes a disembodied wave. It then passes through both slits simultaneously and interferes with itself . Finally, it reanimates as a single particle again as it strikes the back wall. Okay, that's weird, but how does it prove matter requires consciousness?
If detectors watch the slits, the photon acts like a particle. These detectors don't interfere with the photon, they just watch the slits. If a photon passes through their slit, the detector tell the researchers about it. "Hey guys! I just saw a photon shoot through slit A." If there is some form of consciousness (i.e.: a detector) watching the slits, the photons manifest as matter and only passes through one slit. If no one is watching, the photons don't manifest as matter and pass through both slits as a "disembodied" wave. Consciousness manifests matter.
Consciousness comes before matter. Is the detector causing the photon to manifest? To eliminate this possibility, scientists repeated the experiment with only one detector. They observed one slit, but not the other. If the detector was messing with the photon, they should have seen a distinct pattern on the back wall. A wave interference pattern behind the no-detector slit, and a particle pattern behind the detector slit. That's not what happened. What they got were particle patterns behind both slits. When only one slit had a detector observing it, the photon acted as a particle. It acted as a particle even if it doesn't pass through the slit with the detector . In other words, nothing physically affected the photon . The photon manifested as matter because someone could determine which slit it passed though. It didn't pass through slit A, so it must have passed through slit B. Consciousness—intelligence—caused the photon to become matter. The result of this "observing nothing" variation of the two slit experiment, led physicist Richard Conn Henry, Professor of Physics and Astronomy at Johns Hopkins University, to conclude, "The Universe is entirely mental." Variations on the two slit experiment have been performed time and time again. The results are always the same. When left alone, matter assumes a disembodied wave state. When consciousness gets involved, the wave collapses into a physical object. Consciousness causes matter to manifest. Consciousness comes before matter. Max Planck is one of the founders of quantum theory. The two-slit experiment left him to conclude, “I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness.” Matter derives from consciousness. Matter comes from consciousness.

[joeecho]

Holographic Universe is evidence of extreme programming/ advanced brainwashing

This is not brainwashing 101, take everything that is humanly known about brainwashing and then take it to a level beyond that.

Imaging if one's entire perception of everything was the product of advanced brainwashing. Not a comfortable feeling for those who feel they are impervious to brainwashing, no?


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3sXQoGcMN1U

24 & 42

[Justplain]

We know that matter is mainly, hugely, filled with empty space. An atom is 99.9999% empty, only the nucleus has any density. The nucleus is surrounded by 'empty' space filled with electron wavicles. The protons and neutrons (and other components) in the nucleus itself are also wavicles with spin and lots of empty space. When these details are regarded one can see that the universe is a big empty light show, since the energy within the wavicles is a function of light (ie. E=mc2)..

Now, since our physical bodies and its five senses are made up of these empty space components, it is little wonder that our senses follow the rules of this illusion. This does not diminish the possbility that this illusion has a very good purpose. One can call the illusion 'brainwashng' or if one doesnt take it too 'personally' one can see the illusion could be a very good educational tool.

I personally believe that we have immortal souls. Our souls are brought to this illusion to experience separation, likely in part to grow to understand how special beng alive really is. The illusion, like a dream, is evetually awoken from.

I know there are many cruel and odd thngs about our reality here, such as malelovent aliens, evil astral beings that are parasites, etc., however it seems that we're are only given as much as we can handle. I know that if we as a species fail to evolve we will be flushed like atlantis was, however i dont think that we have yet fallen to the immoral depths that the poseids had fallen to, so we are still salvagable.

I dont see reality as a manifestation of a unrepentant demiurge. I see it as a school of learning. There is lots of research that shows that, such as Dr. Michael Newton's work. I suppose one can have another viewpoint, but does it give you anything constructive to work with?

[ponda]

Here's another interesting video on the VR/Simulation theory.

Published on Oct 6, 2015
Are we living in a virtual reality? Is the universe emerging from an information processing system? And if so, could we ever tell? Is it possible to 'hack' the system and change reality? Take a look at the evidence and decide for yourself!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqULEE7eY8M&t=1s

[joeecho]

I dont see reality as a manifestation of a unrepentant demiurge. I see it as a school of learning. There is lots of research that shows that, such as Dr. Michael Newton's work. I suppose one can have another viewpoint, but does it give you anything constructive to work with?

Doesn't have to be a 'unrepentand demiurge', it could be a trickster archetype, for example. Establishing motive is not required. A school of learning is also very much a part of role-playing/ video games. Instead of diplomas, certificates, credentials the player is awarded experience points. There are a number of corporations that award points to the customer/ employee for displaying the type of behavior it wants to foster in the same.

[boutreality]

Justplain/joeecho/Clearlight-

My "Article" -as one PA member called it- at the OP of the previously linked to "Unifed"..." thread basically builds on interpretations written about by Amit Goswami (author of "Physics of the Soul" and "The Self Aware Universe); Gary Zukav (author of "the Dancing Wu Li Masters); and to some extent Fred Alan Wolf (author of "Yoga of Time Travel") though it is entirely founded in my own experience and interpreted for purposes of communication after years at my discipline.

I too am unaware of Bradenburg's work, thanks for the heads up.

Justplain/Clearlight-
The above linked thread specifically assigns the observer a place in terms of the field itself and accounts for the field responding to that place to some degree, it builds upon work put forth by the above authors in that it incorporates consciousness as part of the space-time field. Another good source for this take, since you've mentioned Buddhism is "Time, Space, and Knowledge" by Tarthang Tulku.

[boutreality]

-I take it that GEM theory is a take on "quantum gravity" -a key point in the relativity-quantum theory disconnect- that assigns gravity to a characterization of the field owing to an EM-driven gyroscopic "resonance" effect, and I take no issue to that component.

I'd say it fits with my take that the "Space-Consciousness-Time" field "builds" into matter in accordance to what I call the Law of Probabilistic Propagation and the Law of Probabilistic Collapse and macro-scale gravity (Relativity) is then the continually propagated effect of the collapse characterized in GEM theory which itself gives eventual rise to a gravitational force sufficient to form atoms into molecules.

I cannot say I have the background to officially sign off on that theory since I have absolutely no interest in math and it can only serve to explain a piece of the puzzle that is the unified field if the role sentience plays is considered.

[Justplain]

I dont see reality as a manifestation of a unrepentant demiurge. I see it as a school of learning. There is lots of research that shows that, such as Dr. Michael Newton's work. I suppose one can have another viewpoint, but does it give you anything constructive to work with?

Doesn't have to be a 'unrepentand demiurge', it could be a trickster archetype, for example. Establishing motive is not required. A school of learning is also very much a part of role-playing/ video games. Instead of diplomas, certificates, credentials the player is awarded experience points. There are a number of corporations that award points to the customer/ employee for displaying the type of behavior it wants to foster in the same.

Hi Joeecho, i believe don Juan made the point to Castenada that his mentorship could just be a trick. This is a risk, of being spiritually tricked, that we all need to recognize. Taking personal respnsibility for one's life means that one accepts that risk. This being said, i have to point you to Dr. Michael Newton's work. It appears our souls come from a much more mature realm than ours, where the purpose is spiritual growth that is collectively shared. Tricksterism may exist at the lower astral levels, but in a mature realm closer to the Source it doesnt exist. This light show is for a very serious purpose, the growth of the Source. It is an extremely arduous path, but if one appreciates the beauty in life, it is well worth the cost. And, we really dont have a lot of choice. Like don Juan told Castenada, you have the choice to stay crazy or being less so. One can choose to stay asleep, but after a while one gets tired with reincarnating into the same **** repeatedly.

[boutreality]

"Universe is a Hologram as valid science" psyop, part of the 30% of Scientific Findings that are falsified and well funded, in terms of publication and attention, which Richard Alan Miller spoke about when interviewed by KC last year.
He may have been tipping us off that this was coming.
-And now that I've looked for the interview it may have not been last year and it may have not been posted on PA, but I remember the interview where he levelled the claim.

The subject of this thread is covered in another pre-dating thread where I and a few others have already posted and a merge may be in order:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?95735-Study-reveals-substantial-evidence-of-holographic-universe

[OMG]

Shouldn't this thread be merged with this one? Can't figure out why mods merge some threads and not others.

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?95735-Study-reveals-substantial-evidence-of-holographic-universe

[joeecho]

I dont see reality as a manifestation of a unrepentant demiurge. I see it as a school of learning. There is lots of research that shows that, such as Dr. Michael Newton's work. I suppose one can have another viewpoint, but does it give you anything constructive to work with?

Doesn't have to be a 'unrepentand demiurge', it could be a trickster archetype, for example. Establishing motive is not required. A school of learning is also very much a part of role-playing/ video games. Instead of diplomas, certificates, credentials the player is awarded experience points. There are a number of corporations that award points to the customer/ employee for displaying the type of behavior it wants to foster in the same.

Hi Joeecho, i believe don Juan made the point to Castenada that his mentorship could just be a trick. This is a risk, of being spiritually tricked, that we all need to recognize. Taking personal respnsibility for one's life means that one accepts that risk. This being said, i have to point you to Dr. Michael Newton's work. It appears our souls come from a much more mature realm than ours, where the purpose is spiritual growth that is collectively shared. Tricksterism may exist at the lower astral levels, but in a mature realm closer to the Source it doesnt exist. This light show is for a very serious purpose, the growth of the Source. It is an extremely arduous path, but if one appreciates the beauty in life, it is well worth the cost. And, we really dont have a lot of choice. Like don Juan told Castenada, you have the choice to stay crazy or being less so. One can choose to stay asleep, but after a while one gets tired with reincarnating into the same **** repeatedly.

The parts of your post I highlighted are excellent thoughts to keep in mind. The middle part not so much as Source and growth are not synonymous. Source is complete in and of itself, the light show/ apparent growth is merely an illusory shell game.

[Cidersomerset]

Is The Universe A Hologram?

iNgIl-qIklU

Published on 4 Aug 2015
According to Leonard Susskind ("Bad Boy of Physics"), our reality is much stranger
than it appears to be and life, the universe, EVERYTHING, might just be a holographic
projection! Is the universe a hologram? Is reality an illusion?? Will we ever comprehend
the vastness of outer space?

Special Thanks to:
Books by Leonard Susskind
http://www.amazon.com/Leonard-Susskin...

[Clear Light]

Holographic Universe is evidence of extreme programming/ advanced brainwashing

This is not brainwashing 101, take everything that is humanly known about brainwashing and then take it to a level beyond that.

Imaging if one's entire perception of everything was the product of advanced brainwashing. Not a comfortable feeling for those who feel they are impervious to brainwashing, no?

Oh, LOL, well I'm damn sure the Theoretical Physicists and Astrophysicists in the OP article I posted above won't thank you for this comment Joeecho eh ? :bigsmile:

By the way if anyone is interested there's a 1996 book called "The Holographic Universe", written by Michael Talbot, PDF here (http://users.unitz.ca/napalm/The_Holographic_Universe_Michael_Talbot.pdf) :


Put another way, there is evidence to suggest that our world and everything in it — from snowflakes to maple trees to falling stars and spinning electrons — are also only ghostly images, projections from a level of reality so beyond our own it is literally beyond both space and time.

The main architects of this astonishing idea are two of the world's most eminent thinkers: University of London physicist David Bohm, a protégé of Einstein's and one of the world's most respected quantum physicists; and Karl Pribram, a neurophysiologist at Stanford University and author of the classic neuropsychological textbook Languages of the Brain. Intriguingly, Bohm and Pribram arrived at their conclusions independently and while working from two very different directions.

Bohm became convinced of the universe's holographic nature only after years of dissatisfaction with standard theories inability to explain all of the phenomena encountered in quantum physics. Pribram became convinced because of the failure of standard theories of the brain to explain various neurophysiological puzzles.

However, after arriving at their views, Bohm and Pribram quickly realized the holographic model explained a number of other mysteries as well, including the apparent inability of any theory, no matter how comprehensive, ever to account for all the phenomena encountered in nature; the ability of individuals with hearing in only one ear to determine the direction from which a sound originates; and our ability to recognize the face of someone we have not seen for many years even if that person has changed considerably in the interim.

But the most staggering thing about the holographic model was that it suddenly made sense of a wide range of phenomena so elusive they generally have been categorized outside the province of scientific understanding. These include telepathy, precognition, mystical feelings of oneness with the universe, and even psychokinesis, or the ability of the mind to move physical objects without anyone touching them.

Indeed, it quickly became apparent to the ever growing number of scientists who came to embrace the holographic model that it helped explain virtually all paranormal and mystical experiences, and in the last half-dozen years or so it has continued to galvanize researchers and shed light on an increasing number of previously inexplicable phenomena

[Cidersomerset]

The vid below lasts for approx 1hr 30 mins , the last 30mins is a repeat....


Black Holes And The Holographic Universe (#Mind Blowing Documentary)

Compared by Actor Alan Alda .....

DglZhbTwPYI

Published on 28 Mar 2016
In this Black Hole Facts video, we are going to present you the two most famous
phenomenons of the Modern world i.e., Black holes and the Holographic .

In this Black Hole Facts video, we are going to present you the black hole in the
universe. If you haven't heard about black holes before, watching this real black .

Black Holes And The Holographic Universe (#Mind Blowing Documentary) Black
Holes And The Holographic Universe (#Mind Blowing Documentary) Black .

In this Black Hole Facts video, we are going to take you through a journey across
our universe where you can learn about the cosmic monsters i.e., black holes .

[uzn]

Without proof it´s just a whistle in the wind (Holographic, Computer Sim, Multiverse, etc ....). One could also say the Universe is a giant bowl of Soup. Without proof it´s just as good as any other Theory. Oh and "scientists say", now I will definitly believe it ;)

@Cidersomerset:
Here is the actual Fossil they found:
http://1.f.ix.de/scale/geometry/700/q75/tp/imgs/89/2/1/3/3/0/3/0/reduced_inset-2dbb706dcee149e5.jpg

Thats an Artist rendition (a lot of Fantasy when into this one ;) Like the coloring:
http://1.f.ix.de/scale/geometry/700/q75/tp/imgs/89/2/1/3/3/0/3/0/sac-274569b124ad8e67.jpeg

By the way: If we are the decendents of the Apes, why are they still around ? ;)

[Yuki]

yes I believe so. I have studied physics, quantum especially... and everywhere you turn, this truth becomes more evident. Just the idea of the black hole itself... leaves one questing the reality of all... Everything seems to be a code... We live in a program of our own making... as per the theory of the Observer...
Energy... is the only constant... Through advances in science we are coming to terms with these notions, reaching towards Singularity... To meet ourselves... And become Whole again...

[Justplain]

I dont see reality as a manifestation of a unrepentant demiurge. I see it as a school of learning. There is lots of research that shows that, such as Dr. Michael Newton's work. I suppose one can have another viewpoint, but does it give you anything constructive to work with?

Doesn't have to be a 'unrepentand demiurge', it could be a trickster archetype, for example. Establishing motive is not required. A school of learning is also very much a part of role-playing/ video games. Instead of diplomas, certificates, credentials the player is awarded experience points. There are a number of corporations that award points to the customer/ employee for displaying the type of behavior it wants to foster in the same.

Hi Joeecho, i believe don Juan made the point to Castenada that his mentorship could just be a trick. This is a risk, of being spiritually tricked, that we all need to recognize. Taking personal respnsibility for one's life means that one accepts that risk. This being said, i have to point you to Dr. Michael Newton's work. It appears our souls come from a much more mature realm than ours, where the purpose is spiritual growth that is collectively shared. Tricksterism may exist at the lower astral levels, but in a mature realm closer to the Source it doesnt exist. This light show is for a very serious purpose, the growth of the Source. It is an extremely arduous path, but if one appreciates the beauty in life, it is well worth the cost. And, we really dont have a lot of choice. Like don Juan told Castenada, you have the choice to stay crazy or being less so. One can choose to stay asleep, but after a while one gets tired with reincarnating into the same **** repeatedly.

The parts of your post I highlighted are excellent thoughts to keep in mind. The middle part not so much as Source and growth are not synonymous. Source is complete in and of itself, the light show/ apparent growth is merely an illusory shell game.

Hi Joeecho, this is where we differ. You, and perhaps most gnostics, believe that reality is just a trap, a 'shell game'. This i disagree with.

Firstly, how do we know that even if the Source is complete (and perfect) that It wouldnt want to grow (whatever that entails)?

Secondly, evidence shows that mystics who get closer to the Source experience numerous revelations, such as 'we are all One', blissful joy, boundless love and cosmic consciousness. This demonstrates that journeying through the illusion brings greater enlightenment. A lesson from the school of life (in the hollographic illusion).

Thirdly, there is lots of evidence that existence in all the realms we experience (3d, astral, spirit, etc.) that genuine purpose is involved (some sources are posted above). It appears to be a very long and drawn out process, but it seems to have a goal. For our meek linear minds to comprehend this, it comes down to an oversimplification. The 'law of One' teachings indicate that as we grow in consciousness we come closer to the Source and somehow the Source (and we) benefits from this process. The incredible intelligence that created the multiverse left nothing much to chance, except perhaps enough randomness to give us the illusion/paradox of free choice. The design is too intelligent to be a wasteful shellgame, imho.

[boolacalaca]

Firstly, how do we know that even if the Source is complete (and perfect) that It wouldnt want to grow (whatever that entails)?

Secondly, evidence shows that mystics who get closer to the Source experience numerous revelations, such as 'we are all One', blissful joy, boundless love and cosmic consciousness. This demonstrates that journeying through the illusion brings greater enlightenment. A lesson from the school of life (in the hollographic illusion).

Thirdly, there is lots of evidence that existence in all the realms we experience (3d, astral, spirit, etc.) that genuine purpose is involved (some sources are posted above). It appears to be a very long and drawn out process, but it seems to have a goal. For our meek linear minds to comprehend this, it comes down to an oversimplification. The 'law of One' teachings indicate that as we grow in consciousness we come closer to the Source and somehow the Source (and we) benefits from this process. The incredible intelligence that created the multiverse left nothing much to chance, except perhaps enough randomness to give us the illusion/paradox of free choice. The design is too intelligent to be a wasteful shellgame, imho.

I definitely agree with you Justplain.
A couple more points --

It's possible that Source IS growth and growth IS perfect - the natural order of things.
What we call growth is just the natural unfolding of an infinite creative essence - the shining void that contains all.
From my experiences, the messages from Source are about removing our concepts -- of what Source is, of what we are, of what it all means -- all of which limits.
Ironically, greater enlightenment seems to be the result of shedding the stuff we've heaped on the perfection of being.
It's the old Zen story about the greatest lesson is that there is no lesson -- we're complete.
It's not so much about growing in consciousness -- instead, it's nothing more than getting out of our own way to be the full consciousness we already are.
Holograms are a great metaphor for one aspect of it but that is all.
Likewise, we are also not lotus flowers that literally open our petals when the light of wisdom hits us - another useful metaphor.
There once was a time when science discovered evidence of the existence of atoms too,
but we know how the virtual particle entangled soup of subatomic physics subsequently showed how immaterial that was.
In an infinite creation where anything is possible we can chase explanations forever - but there will always be more.
I'm not sure the point of all of it is a goal -- a goal sounds too much like a reductionist project with bullet points, critical path stages, resource schedules, etc.
From my experience so far, it's much simpler, immediate, and wondrous.

[Innocent Warrior]

Theoretical physicist, Sylvester James Gates discovered a computer code in proposed equations used to describe the cosmos (string theory, supersymmetric). Gates summarises what he's discovered in the clip below (12 minutes).

cvMlUepVgbA

The code itself is worth noting, it's an error correcting code (http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Error-CorrectingCode.html), invented by Claude Shannon (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Shannon) in the 1940s. How bizarre. I haven't looked much into it yet but Shannon was an extaordinary and brilliant man, he is known as the father of information theory (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_theory).

The video below is the 2016 Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate, Gates was a participant and they discussed the universe as a simulation (two hours).

wgSZA3NPpBs

Update -

The code (Doubly-even self-dual linear binary error-correcting block code) explained by Gates (eight minutes) -

q1LCVknKUJ4

The Physics World article, "Symbols Of Power" mentioned by Gates in the above video => http://www.bottomlayer.com/PWJun10gates.pdf

Gates' paper => https://arxiv.org/pdf/0806.0051v1.pdf

[Noelle]

If this universe is simulated, what are some of the more serious theories for the simulation, besides a learning experience? Could our 3D reality be a training program to prepare us for removing the real veil from humanity living on the real planet Earth? A video game that are way-in-the-future selves play for education and/or fun? Not long ago I watched a Dolores Cannon lecture in which she talks about backdrop or background people. I believe this has been covered in the forum before. It was one of the first things that flashed in my mind while reading the articles and watching the videos in the thread.

[joeecho]

If this universe is simulated, what are some of the more serious theories for the simulation, besides a learning experience? Could our 3D reality be a training program to prepare us for removing the real veil from humanity living on the real planet Earth? A video game that are way-in-the-future selves play for education and/or fun? Not long ago I watched a Dolores Cannon lecture in which she talks about backdrop or background people. I believe this has been covered in the forum before. It was one of the first things that flashed in my mind while reading the articles and watching the videos in the the thread.

The Allegory of the Cave hints of this LadyM


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=69F7GhASOdM

[Cidersomerset]

This is part of a bigger interview and Alex starts off about how more scientists
are realising the universe is holographic......

ZFIn708ssFg

[Cidersomerset]

http://static.bbci.co.uk/frameworks/barlesque/3.20.5/orb/4/img/bbc-blocks-dark.png

Galactic X-rays could point to dark matter proof

By Edwin Cartlidge
Science writer


http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news/660/cpsprodpb/1C2C/production/_93921270_c0224699-sagittarius_and_scorpius-spl.jpg
Like other galaxies, the Milky Way is thought to be enveloped in a bubble of dark matter

A small but distinctive signal in X-rays from the Milky Way could be key to proving the
existence of dark matter.


read more.....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-38841577

[Cidersomerset]

The entire universe could be a hologram

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eydp9zh6PvE

Published on 30 Jan 2017
A new study by an international team has found, based on observational evidence,
that the universe could be a hologram.

================================================

Michael Talbot Holographic Universe - FULL Science Documentary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OQ9AETC8HM
Michael Talbot Holographic Universe