Trump: 911 bombs used

[OMG]

Rt-ldMj9y9w

[Justplain]

So why doesnt he re-open the 9/11 investigation?

[Flowerpunkchip]

So why doesnt he re-open the 9/11 investigation?

He might one day. It could take years though. Look simply at the JFK assassination. BBC here in the UK will still say it was Oswald.

Speaking of which, I won't rule out exotic energy weapons being used. ( but I'm straying off the subject a little ) but that theory which I'm open to could delay an investigation.

[KiwiElf]

So why doesnt he re-open the 9/11 investigation?

How do you know that he hasn't? Seems to me, from your similar comments on another thread and here, that your expectations of what he should be doing - after just one month in office - are pretty unrealistic. Why don't you send him a tweet and ask him? In any case, I guess he's running to his schedule, not anyone elses :)

[onawah]

It doesn't need to be re-opened. The Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth have already compiled reams of evidence.
http://www.ae911truth.org/

[Satori]

It doesn't need to be re-opened. The Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth have already complied reams of evidence.
http://www.ae911truth.org/

http://www.journalof911studies.com/resources/2015LooneyVol40Mar.pdf

Right on point, is an article I wrote 2 years ago and which is published in the Journal of 911 Studies. The article posits that the official conspiracy theory vis-a-vis the explanation of the cause of the destruction of WTC 1, 2 and 7 would not be admissible into evidence because it is not scientifically reliable and thus it is irrelevant. Whereas some of the explosive alternative theories explaining the cause(s) of the destruction of these buildings would be admissible into evidence because they are both relevant and scientifically reliable.

[Justplain]

So why doesnt he re-open the 9/11 investigation?

How do you know that he hasn't? Seems to me, from your similar comments on another thread and here, that your expectations of what he should be doing - after just one month in office - are pretty unrealistic. Why don't you send him a tweet and ask him? In any case, I guess he's running to his schedule, not anyone elses :)

Hi Kiwi, you may say that i'm too impatient with trump, but just based upon his administrations stated objectives of financial deregulation and tax cuts, i am already cynical of this guy's true intentions. He hasnt shown much sign of being a true reformer.

[KiwiElf]

So why doesnt he re-open the 9/11 investigation?

How do you know that he hasn't? Seems to me, from your similar comments on another thread and here, that your expectations of what he should be doing - after just one month in office - are pretty unrealistic. Why don't you send him a tweet and ask him? In any case, I guess he's running to his schedule, not anyone elses :)

Hi Kiwi, you may say that i'm too impatient with trump, but just based upon his administrations stated objectives of financial deregulation and tax cuts, i am already cynical of this guy's true intentions. He hasnt shown much sign of being a true reformer.

Yes, you are. (impatient). ;)

His administration has stated many objectives/goals and from where I'm sitting over the ditch, he's systematically dealing with them in an extraordinary fast & efficient manner. It's called PRIORITIES:
What's Urgent,
What's Important,
What's BOTH &
What's Neither?
...over a given & realistic time frame?

(Considering the as*holes he's up against who are ready to take him down at every breath, it's a miracle he's achieved anything at all,... especially within a single month... IMO). :)

Tell me, what did Obama achieve in 8 years? (...Playing golf and screwing America, aside)? :facepalm:

I do believe at some point, he will go after the real perpetrators of 9-11 (and a lot more), but that's way down the TO DO list.

If you think he could do better, I'm inclined to say "put your money where your mouth is". What's your plan? (priorities and realistic deadlines for achieving it?) :clapping: -

(...perhaps on another thread as we're derailing OMG's original topic)

:focus:

[KiwiElf]

For an indication of what those "higher priorities" might be, check out Posts #11-13 here:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?96335-Trump-going-after-pedophile-rings-Pizzagate&p=1136972#post1136972

... particularly this video (at the 30 min mark)

"Deep State - Robert David Steele on The Hagmann Report Updated 2/25/17"

AgqKs1UudRc

...& succinctly summarised, in highest priority order, by RunningDeer

Ten high level threats to humanity by LtGen Dr. Brent Scowcroft, National Security Advisor.

1 Poverty
2 Infectious Disease
3 Environmental Degradation (including losing ground water for our crops)
4 Inter-State Conflict
5 Civil War (which we now have in the United States)
6 Genocide
7 Other Atrocities (including pedophilia and killing kids when you are done with them)
8 Proliferation
9 Terrorism
10 Transnational Crime

Robert Steele’s list also here for which is added:

"Our current information sharing and policy making capabilities are severely skewed toward threats 4 and 5, while neglecting all the others, particularly in relation to true costs over time and returns on investment. No one anywhere is focusing on integrated open source everything engineering."

[Atlas]

ULTIMATE 9/11 PREDICTION.Sean Connery(1982)
J34-mtBGhxQ

[Whiskey_Mystic]

So why doesn't he re-open the 9/11 investigation?

Well, from what I have seen of him, his only motivation is self-aggrandizement and enhancing his own wealth and that of his associates. Despite what some here deeply believe, I have seen zero evidence that he cares about anything else. Certainly not the welfare of the people. Certainly not the truth.

I've never met him, but I know people who have, especially during the 2005-2010 period. The reports I have received about him are consistent. He is not fighting the deep state. He is not the least bit clever enough to do so and he is easily manipulated.

[awakeningmom]

And then there's this:

http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/trump_signs_tremendous_deals_with_saudi_arabia_20170520

Which doesn't seem to jive with this:

https://theintercept.com/2017/05/18/donald-trump-said-saudi-arabia-was-behind-911-now-hes-going-there-on-his-first-foreign-trip/


So what's going on?