PDA

View Full Version : Illuminati programming - The Rolling Stones



Bluegreen
22nd March 2017, 04:36
Mick Jagger - Illuminati member in good standing
Keith Richards - Personally responsible for our current heroin crisis
Bill Wyman - Pedophile
Now they're respected in Society

ptDz5BwAgXQ
http://golnazak.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/guystones_1227118292_resize_460x400.jpg

"The easiest lay on the White House lawn"

Jantje
22nd March 2017, 14:07
I still think drug abuse is a personal responsibility.
Besides the "see eye aye" being more influentual in any "current" heroin crisis than Keith Richards ever has been.

I would like to see Mick's illuminati clubcard as well.

I understand where you are coming from though.

Mankind has always been manipulated by popular culture.

The fear of being left alone is used to guide the flock to the slaughterhouse.

Cardillac
22nd March 2017, 17:36
all I can say to this video is any serious musician who would trash/destroy their instrument(s) is a rogue element and not to be taken seriously;

it never ceases to amaze me how the scum/at best the most mediocre aspect of society but with the loudest mouths/instruments has the most attention in the MSM and popularity in record sales; like start with the incredibly loud/fan-faring but talentless Rolling Stones;

this group never, ever contributed anything musically new except smashing their instruments after they spewed their volumninous acidity (at least in my book);

this group never, ever contributed anything of beauty whatsoever to mankind-

Larry

Mike
22nd March 2017, 18:16
hmmm.....

Not sure where to start.

Is Keith also personally responsible for world hunger?;)

Bill Wyman is a pedophile? Maybe you could provide a link or 2? Thats a pretty heavy accusation. I can see where youre coming from here. I really can. But it wasnt uncommon for rock stars back then to mix with 15, 16 year old girls. Even our fun loving Beatles did that. Doesnt make it any better, of course....but if we're gonna pick on ol Bill here we gotta pick on everyone I spose.

Mick in the illuminati? Well, illuminatti is a loose and nebulous word, with definitions ranging from errand boy to satanic master of cermonies. When you rise to the level of a Mick Jagger, contact with any of these types is inevitable. So how much contact makes one a member? What sort of activities would qualify one as a bonafide illuminatus? I could envision Mick attending a sex party or 2...but I cant see him chopping up newborn babies or anything like that. So assuming im right, what does that make him? An illuminatus or just a horny old bastard?

I just dont know what to think when I hear stuff like this. I dont entirely write it off. There may be some truth in there. But id guess most of it is exaggeration

Noelle
22nd March 2017, 18:20
While I like some of the Stones' songs, it would not be at all surprising. The Moody Blues, on the other hand, have used their own label to create and promote their music. I've been a big fan of the Moodys since high school (even a fan club member at one time). If someone were to tell me they are not what they seem, I would be blown away.

Curt
22nd March 2017, 18:29
I don't know, Larry...Exile on Main Street is a pretty solid album. :thumbsup:

norman
22nd March 2017, 18:39
While I like some of the Stones' songs, it would not be at all surprising. The Moody Blues, on the other hand, have used their own label to create and promote their music. I've been a big fan of the Moodys since high school (even a fan club member at one time). If someone were to tell me they are not what they seem, I would be blown away.

Like with most fields, there are roles to play ( even if innocently ). There's Mr Nasty and there's Mr Nice. Mr Nasty's job is to shock and scare away a young person's parents or guardians. Mr Nice's job is to seduce you while your parents, elders, guardians etc are still in negative reactionary turmoil and effectively disabled from their proper function.

Well, that's how things look from here. I was pretty sweet on the moodies too.

jake gittes
22nd March 2017, 18:42
this group never, ever contributed anything musically new except smashing their instruments after they spewed their volumninous acidity (at least in my book);
this group never, ever contributed anything of beauty whatsoever to mankind-

I think these are ridiculous comments but you are obviously welcome to your opinion. I've derived endless hours of enjoyment from the Stones' music through the years. Same with the Who, who in their early days had the temerity to smash instruments on stage. This was a short-lived practice for shock value. Sorry, but I don't recall any instances of the Stones smashing instruments.

It's only rock-n-roll. (But I like it.)

Jantje
22nd March 2017, 18:48
Same Album. I find this quite pretty. Hate me for it all you want. Besides that, this song really reminds of something beautiful inside my head. Music is just what it is.
In your head it becomes something that is yours personally. Something that is really impossible to put to words anyway...

vnqH7W4me9o

Also the song Before they make me run is on the same album which is Keith's farewell to heroin song. Not that I want to defend drug abuse in any way.

If you read this and you do heroin you are an idiot by the way.

jake gittes
22nd March 2017, 21:34
Mick Jagger - Illuminati member in good standing
Keith Richards - Personally responsible for our current heroin crisis
Bill Wyman - Pedophile
Now they're respected in Society
-- Bluegreen

I don't know that the Rolling Stones are any more "respected in society" than they were in the 1960s, when they were the "bad boys" of rock-n-roll.

Is Keith Richards more "responsible for our heroin crisis" than William S. Burroughs, the "beat" writer in your profile photo who famously and extensively wrote about his own heroin use -- before the Stones were ever even on the scene? Did any of the Stones ever accidentally kill someone playing "William Tell" like Burroughs did?

norman
22nd March 2017, 21:48
The one thing that points towards Jagger being high up in the filth is that very odd death of his girlfriend 2 or 3 years ago.

That death had all the hallmarks of a warning to Jagger. Or perhaps a make-your-mind-up point of no return.

Kristin
22nd March 2017, 21:59
I always enjoyed "Give Me Shelter" more than the average song. There are a number of threads on Pop Culture and it's influences and connections to the Illuminati. The album "Goat's Head Soup" may have had a nasty underlying message on the cover, for example. But I stand guilty as many others. I do enjoy listening to their music.

enfoldedblue
22nd March 2017, 22:49
Coincidently I just watched Cross Fire Hurricane last night. When the band started to become popular an associate of Brian Epstein stepped in and began 'guiding' them. They were told the were to be the black hats...because the Beatles had already taken the white hat position. They talked a lot about playing their roles. I suspect there was an agenda that they were funneled into. I think they were talented kids loved music. ..who took advantage of opportunities presented to them. They definitely explored some dark regions and got involved in the occult. They tend not to talk about this much...so it is unclear how much was part of the overall performance and how much was real. As always the question is how much were they consciously aware of the wider agenda that I believe was designed to coopt the wild awakening energy of the 60s and direct it into it to dark dysfunctional places.

Bluegreen
22nd March 2017, 23:58
Thank you for some interesting reading. I like the music of the Rolling Stones. At one point in the eighties I had to buy a second copy of Exile because the first one finally refused to play.

I have been rethinking many things that I have always kind of just took for granted without really thinking about it such as politics and religion and so forth and I may be preaching to the converted here as I think most reading these words are in a boat that I figure to be similar to mine, and for that I thank every member.

I think of Mick Jagger as being a card-carrying member of the (insert your favoriteword here) the same way as I see Dennis Leary, the talented cigarette-smoking comedian who hit it big as the commercial voice of the car company. The internal combustion engine has been obsolete for 100 years and in that whole time up to and including yesterday the Rockefeller money machine has kept the planet dependent on fossil fuels by all means possible, and there is a book's worth of history on that whole thing available on this very website. Wittingly or not, both celebrities have been paid very well to keep things going as they are.

Mick Jagger is fabulously wealthy and could probably feed the state of Ohio for the next year if the fancy struck him. He has been approached on more than one occasion to go into politics, which tells me something. I don't think the donors would be lining up for Keith.

Keith Richards has been playing the 'hard-drinking' guitar slinger for a long time, over 50 years, and has led a lot of people down the wrong road and this I have seen with my eyes. How does he stay out of jail? I am told his music continues to be popular with young junkies.

Bill Wyman? Definitely.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2301867/Bill-Wyman-Police-interested-Rolling-Stones-affair-13-year-old-Mandy-Smith-claims-slept-14.html
www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/music/rockandpopfeatures/11395848/We-agree-Seventies-rock-stars-a-license-to-behave-badly.html
www.oncefallen.com/retroactivity
www.thepensivequill.am/2014/09/sex-drugs-rocknroll_24.html

Deborah (ahamkara)
23rd March 2017, 04:11
For many of us the Rolling Stones provided a backdrop to the drama that was our young lives. They were one of the most amazing live rock bands on the '69 tour and still one of the best on the '72 tour. They were fabulous musicians and Mick was skillful at evoking and maintaining crowd energy. Keith was a natural rhythm guitarist and understood that instrument as a tool to amplify emotion.

That said, at their creative apex - Beggar's Banquet and Let it Bleed, one could see that they had indeed shifted to align with a powerful dark energy "Sympathy for the Devil" sort of lays it out, doesn't it? ....Nazis? pedophilia? The English aristocracy and their debaunched sexuality....).The songs on"Let it Bled"(!) were a plaintive cry "Gimmie Shelter", "You Can't Always Get What You Want", "Love in Vain") to a lost innocence, and sad acceptance of the real price of fame.The dark, chaotic "Exile" was the beginning of the end for the Stones -creatively and personally. The Villa in France where it was recorded belonged to the Nazi elite during WWI. Keith mentions in his memoir that their were swaztikas on the heater vents. I believe Keith had a baby with Anita that died in mysterious circumstances around that time. Given Anita's infatuation with the occult, who knows? Mick Taylor became addicted to heroin, etc.

Now they are just a sad reminder of the picture of Dorian Gray taken down from the attic. I loved the Stones, their early music had an emotional power, but if I am honest, I would say that in retrospect they served the Dark forces. My own opinion is that Keith's choice of heroin was a numbing/coping strategy in response the his increasingly dark reality.

DNA
23rd March 2017, 07:34
Mick Jagger - Illuminati member in good standing
Keith Richards - Personally responsible for our current heroin crisis
Bill Wyman - Pedophile
Now they're respected in Society
-- Bluegreen

I don't know that the Rolling Stones are any more "respected in society" than they were in the 1960s, when they were the "bad boys" of rock-n-roll.

Is Keith Richards more "responsible for our heroin crisis" than William S. Burroughs, the "beat" writer in your profile photo who famously and extensively wrote about his own heroin use -- before the Stones were ever even on the scene? Did any of the Stones ever accidentally kill someone playing "William Tell" like Burroughs did?


D@mn Jake, you just took a brother to school.
Hell, I just looked up the William Burroughs deal with him shooting his wife in the face, and then I had to look up the deal with "William Tell". I knew none of this.
And William Burrough's son "Billy Williams" lived a short life due to drug and alcohol addiction no doubt in part due to his mother being shot in the face by his father while he was 5. William Burroughs never helped much, he never had anything to do in his son's life, unless you count a one year stint at the age of 13 when young Billy came to live with Burroughs in Tangiers where he was in constant danger of being raped by the "beatnik" associates of William Burroughs.
I've always harbored a kind of respect for Burroughs for years, but not anymore.
After reading this stuff I've come to the conclusion that Burroughs was a piece of sh!t.

Carmody
23rd March 2017, 17:04
Burroughs was pretty far from perfect. But he was a good sounding board regarding his voice on how he saw things. Monoculture is a dead culture, kinda thing.

Move the ship about, let it roll, killing off or supporting given bits is both good and bad, and so on. Judgement only kills one's own future into a circular downturn of turning to dust. A million ways to say it.

There is no reason to assume that the members of the Stones have mythic levels of intelligence and psychological reach. That they can somehow navigate some sort of elevated and complex two faced satanism and a known norm. Reality and experience says otherwise. That if manipulation exists in such areas, that it is more unconscious and subliminal than that of direct knowing and involvement. Anything else would be projection.

Experience and a healthy realism (adjust to norms) teaches otherwise (than the projection). My mistake generally centers around my mistaking that people have the reach required to get some of the more complex stuff I write about or am concerned with. Or, for example, failing to understand that I might have just seemed to insult a few with that sentence. Or, that I meant no such thing and others might misinterpret. And so on.

BMJ
23rd March 2017, 18:42
Bono (U2) with Mick Jagger - Recording JOY

n_HJrWsUhiQ

Mick keeps good company with another sell out, Bono. It looks like Bono at 1.10 minutes is picking Mick's brain about how he churned out so many songs in the 1960's. Poor Bono without a cause and without a clue about how to connect with the people, I suppose that what happens when you convert and become an elite.

Bluegreen
25th March 2017, 15:39
Thank you for posting Jake :)

The Rolling Stones have made and continue to make enormous sums of money. Our current generation is marked by a grotesque and sinful inequality of wealth that has never been seen before. We the 99% were hammered into accepting this social change (and that's what it is) by the "greed is good" movie and it has worked like a charm because now when we learn that 8 individuals control half the planet's wealth we just yawn and reach for another potato chip. The so-called illuminati's plan to steal the planet and its resources unfortunately is proceeding as scheduled right under our noses.


I don't know that the Rolling Stones are any more "respected in society" than they were in the 1960s, when they were the "bad boys" of rock-n-roll.

I would suggest, certainly with the money involved, they are much more respected in society today.


Is Keith Richards more "responsible for our heroin crisis" than William S. Burroughs, the "beat" writer in your profile photo who famously and extensively wrote about his own heroin use -- before the Stones were ever even on the scene?

Not any more or less. While neither is exclusively responsible for our current heroin crisis, both are personally responsible for the life, deeds, and actions taken to the grave. Let's throw in the drug-abusing painter Jean-Michel Basquiat and make the case that all three celebrities produced, for whatever reason, art that many consider to be worthwhile. Of course our friend Larry is not alone in expressing another opinion.


Did any of the Stones ever accidentally kill someone playing "William Tell" like Burroughs did?

Brian Jones' demise was ruled "death by misadventure". I don't know if he was playing "William Tell" but he might've been playing "Spin The Bottle".

Bluegreen
25th March 2017, 23:08
In 1971, Princess Margaret convinced her friend Mick Jagger to build a home near her residence on the island of Mustique.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/07/17/article-2174622-140A4416000005DC-416_634x431.jpg
Go go go little queenie

"Mick always wanted to be like them - he aspired to be an aristo from the very start," said his friend and long-time publicist Keith Altham.
___

Recommended by illuminati bigwig Tony Blair multiple times, Sir Mick Jagger was knighted by even bigger illuminati bigwig The Queen of England in 2003, although Prince Charles graciously stepped in for his mother to do the actual dirty deed, er, honours.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/05/23/article-2148912-13418174000005DC-664_634x424.jpg
Go Little Queenie Go

Bluegreen
26th March 2017, 03:45
In 1966, a mysterious figure appeared in Keith Richards' entourage due to his seemingly endless suitcase full of illegal substances. Pioneering investigative journalist Mae Brussell wrote about how the relatively sober and ambitious Jagger (he refused to take LSD) was affected by drugs:

"Chrissie Shrimpton described how Jagger's mind was affected after taking acid. (He) had a nervous breakdown in the United States, June 1966 ..."

"Henry or David Schneiderman, a sinister American or Canadian ... he had so many passports no one was certain of his origins, brought to Richards' home a suitcase ... which contained several pounds of heroin, cannabis, pills, every herb and chemical to stab or stroke the mind ... along with choice LSD from San Francisco. Schniederman had let believe he was really bending the law all over the world, he was on a James Bond thing, like CIA or something ..."
Tony Scaduto Mick Jagger

This 'or something' has been reported by sources in the US and Britain as being an assignment from MI5 and the FBI.

www.aangirfan.blogspot.com/2014/03/mick-jagger-satanism-and-cia.html

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/09/30/article-2210932-1548D2CD000005DC-785_634x431.jpg
'Snyderman' and Richards

Within a year Richards would be spending a lot of time in Laurel Canyon, California, with his new BFF, musician Gram Parsons.

Bluegreen
26th March 2017, 06:48
Ingram Cecil Connor III aka Gram Parsons was from Winterhaven, Florida, and grew up in privilege as the grandson of a citrus fruit magnate. He developed an interest in country music while attending the illuminati breeding ground known as Harvard University.

In 1966, Parsons was leading a struggling combo called the International Submarine Band. Using his trust fund, he moved the group to California and purchased a house for the band in Laurel Canyon, home at the time to the largest covert CIA facility in the country.

http://www.desertusa.com/dusablog/wp-content/uploads/tumblr_ly53u1b7yF1qfrytdo1_1280.jpg
We love LA. We love it.

FACT: Keith Richards was heavily involved with the Laurel Canyon music scene

Dave McGowan's Inside the LC: The Strange But Mostly True Story of Laurel Canyon (pdf)
http://www.conspirazzi.com/e-books/inside-the-lc.pdf

Bluegreen
26th March 2017, 07:36
Next up for the Stones was the concert at Altamont Speedway in 1969, an event which turned out to be a social and cultural turning point for many and for many different reasons. This is a scared bunch of musicians right here.

vRQaqmP7QGY

Bluegreen
26th March 2017, 13:17
The one thing that points towards Jagger being high up in the filth is that very odd death of his girlfriend 2 or 3 years ago.

That death had all the hallmarks of a warning to Jagger. Or perhaps a make-your-mind-up point of no return.

Fashion designer L'Wren Scott (born Laura "Luann" Bambrough in Salt Lake City, Utah) was Jagger's companion for over a decade. In 2014, her body was found in her Manhattan apartment in what was determined a suicide.

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/10/19/article-2220419-1595343B000005DC-102_634x764.jpg

6'3" L'Wren and Nat "Tiny" Rothschild

Bluegreen
26th March 2017, 18:19
There is a contingent of informed citizens that have come to the conclusion that the Altamont concert was, in fact, a staged satanic ritual done for the benefit of the illuminati. I do see this event as the one that ushered Death through the doorway of popular music. Before this, there was no death metal, Dead Kennedys, or Dead Can Dance, and then of course there's the whole equally death-obssessed Goth thing ... The Stones hammered this satanic stuff into the public consciousness for a long time. Were they playing around? Or playing around?

1965-66

http://dangerousminds.net/content/uploads/images/made/content/uploads/images/jumpingjackFLASH_465_456_int.jpg

1967-68

http://dangerousminds.net/content/uploads/images/made/content/uploads/images/satanic-mrtyhajesties-request-cover_thumb_465_469_int.jpg

1973

p88zKscGpYs
2016

N1VrLOyYiFI

Bluegreen
27th March 2017, 21:09
1972

http://i.pinimg.com/236x/b8/d5/a8/b8d5a8e080d7e39168077199db835cc2--drug-free-patience.jpg

2019

http://www.alt-tshirts.com/files/class_2/images/large/2_20697_765582_1345509332.png

2014

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/11/12/1415805520646_wps_4_opium_graph_jpg.jpg

Bluegreen
28th March 2017, 12:31
www.bibliotecapleyades.net/bloodlines/index.htm

13 Satanic Bloodlines of the Illuminati Checklist

ROTHSCHILD X
WINDSOR X
KENNEDY X

http://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/f7/96/73/f79673fbabbc6cccd29911b1d414d891.jpg

http://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/d5/25/33/d525335a192f607777f786ccf1374664.jpg

http://www.tagesspiegel.de/images/heprodimagesfotos88120140716schirn_presse_papparazi_pigozzi_jagger_schwarzenegger_1990-jpg/10210068/12format6001.jpg

Bluegreen
28th March 2017, 12:45
All secrecy
No privacy
Right now somebody is
Listening
To you

6dLa2l1tyx0