ramus
7th May 2017, 17:28
Climate Intervention: A Government Cover-Up Of Epic Proportions
http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/news-articles-42.shtml#PM
ARE THEY ADMITTING TO CHEM-TRAILS ? AFTER ALL THIS TIME.
Climate Intervention: A Government Cover-Up Of Epic Proportions
December 3 2016 | From: WND
I recently addressed how CIA Director John Brennan gave a historic speech (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBG81dXgM0Q) to the
Council on Foreign Relations, confessing something few thought they would ever
hear: the federal government’s explicit and intentional climate intervention via
operations like stratospheric aerosol spraying or injections, or SAI.
http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/images/chemtrails-geoengineering-space-2.jpg
What I didn’t explain is that SAI is a ginormous federal geo-engineering cover
up that is now being exposed, and yet not a single mainstream media outlet has
reported on it. Let me explain.
In April, the U.S. Senate directed (https://www.aip.org/fyi/2016/senate-moving-fast-doe-spending-bill-defunds-iter) the Department of Energy (DOE) “to review the
findings of the National Academy [of Sciences, or NAS] report, “Climate
Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth,” (http://www.nap.edu/catalog/18988/climate-intervention-reflecting-sunlight-to-cool-earth) and “to study the potential
impacts of albedo modification [or solar radiation management], a potential
method of geoengineering,” which included “smaller scale field trials” (http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/fight-global-warming-senate-calls-study-making-earth-reflect-more-light).
Science (http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/fight-global-warming-senate-calls-study-making-earth-reflect-more-light) magazine explained:
“Albedo modification would work by lacing the atmosphere with tiny particles or aerosols that would reflect sunlight and mimic natural processes.
For example, in 1991 the volcano Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines spewed 20 million tons of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, which spans altitudes from 10 to 50 kilometers.
There, the sulfur dioxide produced aerosols that reflected enough sunlight to reduce global temperature by an estimated 0.3°C for 3 years.
Albedo modification might also work by using aerosols to seed cloud formation in a lower atmospheric layer called the troposphere.”
The U.S. Senate pushed the DOE to pursue albedo modification action a couple
months before CIA Director Brennan (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBG81dXgM0Q) gave his blessing to stratospheric spraying
as a government operation that “potentially could help reverse the warming
effects of global climate change.”
What’s crazy about all that government endorsement is that the February 2015 NAS
report, on which the feds base their entire toxic rain operation;
“Warned explicitly that albedo modification shouldn’t be deployed now because the risks and benefits were far too uncertain.”
What are those risks? Here are just three grave consequences that we know about:
Drought (http://theantimedia.org/dangers-of-geoengineering-weather-modification): The team under Chien Wang, a co-author of the NAS study and a senior
research scientist at MIT’s Center for Global Change Science and the Department
of Earth, concluded that albedo modification would lead;
“To dangerous changes in global weather: Precipitation would also decline worldwide, and some parts of the world would be worse off. Europe, the Horn of Africa, and Pakistan may receive less rainfall than they have historically.”
Loss of blue sky (https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21873-geoengineering-would-turn-blue-skies-whiter): According to a report by the New Scientist (http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21873-geoengineering-would-turn-blue-skies-whiter.html), Ben Kravitz of the
Carnegie Institution for Science explained, “Releasing sulphate aerosols high in
the atmosphere should in theory reduce global temperatures by reflecting a small
percentage of the incoming sunlight away from the Earth.
http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/images/chemtrails-geoengineering-2.jpg
However, the extra particles would also scatter more of the remaining light into
the atmosphere. This would reduce by 20 per cent the amount of sunlight that
takes a direct route to the ground, and it would increase levels of softer,
diffuse scattered light,” making the sky appear hazier.
Hazards to human health and other earth life (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717532): The gravest of all consequences of
atmospheric aerosol spraying is that, simply put, what’s sprayed above us
settles down upon us and in us, as well as other life on earth.
The U.S. government’s own National Center for Biotechnology Information, or
NCBI, released a report in January 2016 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717532), the goal of which was “Assessing the
direct occupational and public health impacts of solar radiation management with
stratospheric aerosols.” The NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717532) concluded:
“Our analysis suggests that adverse public health impacts may reasonably be expected from SRM via deployment of stratospheric aerosols.
Little is known about the toxicity of some likely candidate aerosols, and there is no consensus regarding acceptable levels for public exposure to these materials.
There is also little infrastructure in place to evaluate potential public health impacts in the event that stratospheric aerosols are deployed for solar radiation management.”
No wonder the co-author of the study on “Climate Intervention,” Dr. James
Fleming (http://www.colby.edu/sts/JimFleming.html), called (http://www.thenation.com/article/197353/why-geoengineering-untested-and-untestable) geo-engineering like SAI: “untested and untestable, and
dangerous beyond belief.”
http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/images/chemtrails-new-zealand-1.jpg
Another colleague and co-author, Dr. Raymond T. Pierrehumbert, the Louis Block
professor in geophysical sciences at the University of Chicago, and Sweden’s
King Carl XVI Gustafn, chairman in environmental science at Stockholm’s
Universitet, took it one step further. He warned;
“The nearly two years’ worth of reading and animated discussions that went into
this study have convinced me more than ever that the idea of ‘fixing’ the
climate by hacking the Earth’s reflection of sunlight is wildly, utterly,
howlingly barking mad.”
(That is why Dr. Pierrehumbert prefers to call albedo modification by the name
“albedo hacking.”)
Dr. Pierrehumber added: “The report describes albedo modification frankly as
involving large and partly unknown risks. It states outright that albedo
modification ‘should not be deployed.'”
So, why are the U.S. Senate and CIA director disregarding the dire and
passionate warnings of scientists like Dr. Pierrehumbert and Dr. Fleming by
demanding that the Department of Energy proceed with trials on geo-engineering?
In the words of Dr. Pierrehumber, are they “wildly, utterly, howlingly barking
mad”? Answer: Yes!
Is it a mere coincidence that the very government agencies that are spraying our
stratosphere with toxic chemicals were the actual sponsors of the NAS report (http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=02102015)?
The NAS itself confessed:
“The study was sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, U.S. intelligence community, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and U.S. Department of Energy”.
Isn’t that like your right hand quoting your left hand so that your right hand
can grab what it’s already holding? Is the NAS report another government push and ploy to collaborate and cite “scientific proof” to justify its clandestine climate agenda?
Why else would the CIA and U.S. Senate be proceeding in climate aerosol spraying when the very scientists preparing the study warned, “Stop! Don’t do it! It’s crazy and dangerous!”
The most colossal and tragic of all government cover-ups is the fact that the
feds have been waging climate warfare for more than 30 years, lacing our clouds
and stratosphere with dangerous nano-particles, including environmental
sulfates, black carbon, metallic aluminum and aluminum oxide aerosols.
The truth is, for decades, the feds have been covertly and overtly running sky
criminal operations (http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/sky-criminals) behind (above!) our backs, leaving humans and the rest of
the planet life as lab rats of their toxic cocktail fallout.
Geoengineeringwatch.org (http://Geoengineeringwatch.org) reported that a 1978 750-page congressional report (http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/massive-us-senate-document-on-national-and-global-weather-modification) was
recently discovered with a mountain of information going back decades that
“confirms the ongoing extensive involvement of our government in climate
modification/weather warfare.
This document also confirms the involvement of foreign governments around the
globe, even governments that would otherwise have been considered ‘hostile to US
interests.'”
Why hasn’t a single mainstream media outlet reported on the CIA and DOE’s march
forward with SAI when the scientific community has explicitly and repeatedly
warned against it?
Why are geo-engineering researchers being stonewalled (http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/why-are-geo-engineering-researchers-being-stonewalled) by government and media?
And why in hell are watchdogs on both the left and right dodging the feds’
intentional and hazardous climate intervention, when they seek to uncover
government cover-ups and conspiracies with the most scant of evidence?
Dane Wigington (http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/massive-us-senate-document-on-national-and-global-weather-modification), the lead researcher for GeoengineeringWatch.org (http://Geoengineeringwatch.org) and a fierce
fighter for government geoengineering transparency, was absolutely right when he
wrote: “How big does the climate engineering elephant in the room need to be
before it can no longer be hidden in plain sight?
http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/images/chemtrails-geoengineering-real-crime.jpg
How much more historical proof do we need of the ongoing climate
engineering/weather warfare before the denial of the masses crumbles? When will
populations around the globe bring to justice all those responsible for the
ongoing and rapidly worsening worldwide weather warfare assault?”
Is it a mere coincidence that, in October 2015, the feds put a universal “gag
order” (http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/file/Peer_-_Weather_Service_Employees_Tethered_By_Illegal_Gag_Orders_-_2015-10-21.pdf) on agency employees in “The National Weather Service,” the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration” and the “U.S. Dept. of Commerce”?
Is it a mere coincidence that the Obama administration has spent more taxpayer
monies for legal prosecutions of government whistleblowers than all other U.S.
presidents combined, resulting in 31 times the jail sentences (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/05/obama-has-sentenced-whistleblowers-to-31-times-the-jail-time-of-all-prior-u-s-presidents-combined.html)?
It’s time to blow the lid off the government’s climate cover-up!
http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/images/chemtrails-Wellington-NZ.jpg
That is why my wife, Gena, and I encourage citizens everywhere to do their own
research on geo-engineering (http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/a-climate-engineering-introduction-to-media-and-the-uninformed) and then write their government representatives to
demand action. We also encourage the support of the Legal Alliance (http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/anti-geoengineering-legal-alliance-files-us-60-day-notice-of-legal-action) of pro-bono
lawyers now amassed as a united front to fight the geo-engineering government
cover-up in court.
To read or learn more immediately, I highly recommend the work and website of
Dane Wigington. GeoEngineeringWatch.org (http://Geoengineeringwatch.org) is loaded with great research on the
many facets of climate intervention.
http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/news-articles-42.shtml#PM
ARE THEY ADMITTING TO CHEM-TRAILS ? AFTER ALL THIS TIME.
Climate Intervention: A Government Cover-Up Of Epic Proportions
December 3 2016 | From: WND
I recently addressed how CIA Director John Brennan gave a historic speech (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBG81dXgM0Q) to the
Council on Foreign Relations, confessing something few thought they would ever
hear: the federal government’s explicit and intentional climate intervention via
operations like stratospheric aerosol spraying or injections, or SAI.
http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/images/chemtrails-geoengineering-space-2.jpg
What I didn’t explain is that SAI is a ginormous federal geo-engineering cover
up that is now being exposed, and yet not a single mainstream media outlet has
reported on it. Let me explain.
In April, the U.S. Senate directed (https://www.aip.org/fyi/2016/senate-moving-fast-doe-spending-bill-defunds-iter) the Department of Energy (DOE) “to review the
findings of the National Academy [of Sciences, or NAS] report, “Climate
Intervention: Reflecting Sunlight to Cool Earth,” (http://www.nap.edu/catalog/18988/climate-intervention-reflecting-sunlight-to-cool-earth) and “to study the potential
impacts of albedo modification [or solar radiation management], a potential
method of geoengineering,” which included “smaller scale field trials” (http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/fight-global-warming-senate-calls-study-making-earth-reflect-more-light).
Science (http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2016/04/fight-global-warming-senate-calls-study-making-earth-reflect-more-light) magazine explained:
“Albedo modification would work by lacing the atmosphere with tiny particles or aerosols that would reflect sunlight and mimic natural processes.
For example, in 1991 the volcano Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines spewed 20 million tons of sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere, which spans altitudes from 10 to 50 kilometers.
There, the sulfur dioxide produced aerosols that reflected enough sunlight to reduce global temperature by an estimated 0.3°C for 3 years.
Albedo modification might also work by using aerosols to seed cloud formation in a lower atmospheric layer called the troposphere.”
The U.S. Senate pushed the DOE to pursue albedo modification action a couple
months before CIA Director Brennan (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WBG81dXgM0Q) gave his blessing to stratospheric spraying
as a government operation that “potentially could help reverse the warming
effects of global climate change.”
What’s crazy about all that government endorsement is that the February 2015 NAS
report, on which the feds base their entire toxic rain operation;
“Warned explicitly that albedo modification shouldn’t be deployed now because the risks and benefits were far too uncertain.”
What are those risks? Here are just three grave consequences that we know about:
Drought (http://theantimedia.org/dangers-of-geoengineering-weather-modification): The team under Chien Wang, a co-author of the NAS study and a senior
research scientist at MIT’s Center for Global Change Science and the Department
of Earth, concluded that albedo modification would lead;
“To dangerous changes in global weather: Precipitation would also decline worldwide, and some parts of the world would be worse off. Europe, the Horn of Africa, and Pakistan may receive less rainfall than they have historically.”
Loss of blue sky (https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21873-geoengineering-would-turn-blue-skies-whiter): According to a report by the New Scientist (http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn21873-geoengineering-would-turn-blue-skies-whiter.html), Ben Kravitz of the
Carnegie Institution for Science explained, “Releasing sulphate aerosols high in
the atmosphere should in theory reduce global temperatures by reflecting a small
percentage of the incoming sunlight away from the Earth.
http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/images/chemtrails-geoengineering-2.jpg
However, the extra particles would also scatter more of the remaining light into
the atmosphere. This would reduce by 20 per cent the amount of sunlight that
takes a direct route to the ground, and it would increase levels of softer,
diffuse scattered light,” making the sky appear hazier.
Hazards to human health and other earth life (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717532): The gravest of all consequences of
atmospheric aerosol spraying is that, simply put, what’s sprayed above us
settles down upon us and in us, as well as other life on earth.
The U.S. government’s own National Center for Biotechnology Information, or
NCBI, released a report in January 2016 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717532), the goal of which was “Assessing the
direct occupational and public health impacts of solar radiation management with
stratospheric aerosols.” The NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4717532) concluded:
“Our analysis suggests that adverse public health impacts may reasonably be expected from SRM via deployment of stratospheric aerosols.
Little is known about the toxicity of some likely candidate aerosols, and there is no consensus regarding acceptable levels for public exposure to these materials.
There is also little infrastructure in place to evaluate potential public health impacts in the event that stratospheric aerosols are deployed for solar radiation management.”
No wonder the co-author of the study on “Climate Intervention,” Dr. James
Fleming (http://www.colby.edu/sts/JimFleming.html), called (http://www.thenation.com/article/197353/why-geoengineering-untested-and-untestable) geo-engineering like SAI: “untested and untestable, and
dangerous beyond belief.”
http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/images/chemtrails-new-zealand-1.jpg
Another colleague and co-author, Dr. Raymond T. Pierrehumbert, the Louis Block
professor in geophysical sciences at the University of Chicago, and Sweden’s
King Carl XVI Gustafn, chairman in environmental science at Stockholm’s
Universitet, took it one step further. He warned;
“The nearly two years’ worth of reading and animated discussions that went into
this study have convinced me more than ever that the idea of ‘fixing’ the
climate by hacking the Earth’s reflection of sunlight is wildly, utterly,
howlingly barking mad.”
(That is why Dr. Pierrehumbert prefers to call albedo modification by the name
“albedo hacking.”)
Dr. Pierrehumber added: “The report describes albedo modification frankly as
involving large and partly unknown risks. It states outright that albedo
modification ‘should not be deployed.'”
So, why are the U.S. Senate and CIA director disregarding the dire and
passionate warnings of scientists like Dr. Pierrehumbert and Dr. Fleming by
demanding that the Department of Energy proceed with trials on geo-engineering?
In the words of Dr. Pierrehumber, are they “wildly, utterly, howlingly barking
mad”? Answer: Yes!
Is it a mere coincidence that the very government agencies that are spraying our
stratosphere with toxic chemicals were the actual sponsors of the NAS report (http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?RecordID=02102015)?
The NAS itself confessed:
“The study was sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences, U.S. intelligence community, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and U.S. Department of Energy”.
Isn’t that like your right hand quoting your left hand so that your right hand
can grab what it’s already holding? Is the NAS report another government push and ploy to collaborate and cite “scientific proof” to justify its clandestine climate agenda?
Why else would the CIA and U.S. Senate be proceeding in climate aerosol spraying when the very scientists preparing the study warned, “Stop! Don’t do it! It’s crazy and dangerous!”
The most colossal and tragic of all government cover-ups is the fact that the
feds have been waging climate warfare for more than 30 years, lacing our clouds
and stratosphere with dangerous nano-particles, including environmental
sulfates, black carbon, metallic aluminum and aluminum oxide aerosols.
The truth is, for decades, the feds have been covertly and overtly running sky
criminal operations (http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/sky-criminals) behind (above!) our backs, leaving humans and the rest of
the planet life as lab rats of their toxic cocktail fallout.
Geoengineeringwatch.org (http://Geoengineeringwatch.org) reported that a 1978 750-page congressional report (http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/massive-us-senate-document-on-national-and-global-weather-modification) was
recently discovered with a mountain of information going back decades that
“confirms the ongoing extensive involvement of our government in climate
modification/weather warfare.
This document also confirms the involvement of foreign governments around the
globe, even governments that would otherwise have been considered ‘hostile to US
interests.'”
Why hasn’t a single mainstream media outlet reported on the CIA and DOE’s march
forward with SAI when the scientific community has explicitly and repeatedly
warned against it?
Why are geo-engineering researchers being stonewalled (http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/why-are-geo-engineering-researchers-being-stonewalled) by government and media?
And why in hell are watchdogs on both the left and right dodging the feds’
intentional and hazardous climate intervention, when they seek to uncover
government cover-ups and conspiracies with the most scant of evidence?
Dane Wigington (http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/massive-us-senate-document-on-national-and-global-weather-modification), the lead researcher for GeoengineeringWatch.org (http://Geoengineeringwatch.org) and a fierce
fighter for government geoengineering transparency, was absolutely right when he
wrote: “How big does the climate engineering elephant in the room need to be
before it can no longer be hidden in plain sight?
http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/images/chemtrails-geoengineering-real-crime.jpg
How much more historical proof do we need of the ongoing climate
engineering/weather warfare before the denial of the masses crumbles? When will
populations around the globe bring to justice all those responsible for the
ongoing and rapidly worsening worldwide weather warfare assault?”
Is it a mere coincidence that, in October 2015, the feds put a universal “gag
order” (http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/file/Peer_-_Weather_Service_Employees_Tethered_By_Illegal_Gag_Orders_-_2015-10-21.pdf) on agency employees in “The National Weather Service,” the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration” and the “U.S. Dept. of Commerce”?
Is it a mere coincidence that the Obama administration has spent more taxpayer
monies for legal prosecutions of government whistleblowers than all other U.S.
presidents combined, resulting in 31 times the jail sentences (http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/05/obama-has-sentenced-whistleblowers-to-31-times-the-jail-time-of-all-prior-u-s-presidents-combined.html)?
It’s time to blow the lid off the government’s climate cover-up!
http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/images/chemtrails-Wellington-NZ.jpg
That is why my wife, Gena, and I encourage citizens everywhere to do their own
research on geo-engineering (http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/a-climate-engineering-introduction-to-media-and-the-uninformed) and then write their government representatives to
demand action. We also encourage the support of the Legal Alliance (http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/anti-geoengineering-legal-alliance-files-us-60-day-notice-of-legal-action) of pro-bono
lawyers now amassed as a united front to fight the geo-engineering government
cover-up in court.
To read or learn more immediately, I highly recommend the work and website of
Dane Wigington. GeoEngineeringWatch.org (http://Geoengineeringwatch.org) is loaded with great research on the
many facets of climate intervention.