PDA

View Full Version : Significant Recent Schumann Resonance Amp Up? (8 May, 2017)



Alpha141
10th May 2017, 05:53
Hi all,

Just an offering of a recent event and potential for other things of a similar nature increasing going forth. This is offered as a chance to reflect upon how you have been and how others around you may have too.

lGslNumkyaw

Welcome Consciousness Explorer.

If this is the first time hearing Andrew also, Welcome.

The Schumann Resonance is a frequency which has the potential to influence human consciousness. Individually and humanity as a whole. It is a component that contributes to the experience on Earth at this time. And, it is an ally to humanity. As another expression of it is known as the Heartbeat of Earth Mother. Have you felt it yet?

There has been a significant event related to it of recent times. Highlighted by May 8th 2017 measurements displayed in the images within this video. It offers Andrew an opportunity to explore this subject with recent events as context. It also offers you a chance to reflect how you have been over this period and help recognise such experiences for you going forth also. There is a potential for that to indeed be the case. In combination with other similar scale events such as Solar Flares as mentioned.

If you wish to keep an eye on such things. The below link is very useful for proactive vigilance:
https://www.heartmath.org/research/global-coherence/gcms-live-data/

Andrew Bartzis Website:
http://galactichistorian.com/

Enjoy

Olaf
10th May 2017, 06:09
No, it is not.

We must not confuse amplitude with frequency.

What we do see, is spikes in amplitudes (Амплитуды). No change in frequency can be derived from this graph.
Such a change in amplitude would even result from having a thunderstorm somewhere in not so far distance, because the resonances would be fed by discharging lightnings...


Recordings of the Schumann-frequencies are published here:
Frequencies of the Schumann resonance recorded at Tomsk Space Observing System (http://sosrff.tsu.ru/?page_id=9)

Частоты = frequencies
White = first harmonic 8...8,5 Hz
yellow = second harmonic (17 Hz)
red = third harmonic (19 Hz)
green = fourth harmonic (25 Hz)

As we see: no changes in Schumann frequencies visible

The graph that is shown in above video is about amplitudes of Schumann frequencies, also seen here (http://sosrff.tsu.ru/?page_id=12) in a different representation.

Bill Ryan
10th May 2017, 06:26
That's correct. The Schumann Resonance frequency doesn't change.

araucaria
10th May 2017, 07:23
That's correct. The Schumann Resonance frequency doesn't change.
And a very good thing too; See this post: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?72808-The-Utter-Necessity-of-Staying-Positive&p=852507&viewfull=1#post852507

Nick Matkin
10th May 2017, 14:14
Yes, Olaf is completely correct. The Schumann signal and its harmonics are the parallel lines in the top image. Some local interference (could be thunderstorms or low-energy lighting or other electronic equipment) is creating the wide-band noise as shown by the white stripes.

The bottom image is indicating the overall *amplitude* (can't read the units, but possibly pico-Teslas) of all the signals, including the interference.

As Bill says, the frequency cannot change (well only slight diurnal variations of up to about 0.5 Hz) because it is the EM resonance of the void between the earth and the ionosphere - of which the size of neither can change!

Why does this keep coming up? It's another example of one of those subjects that just won't go away. Like so much technical information, it gets repeatedly misinterpreted and misused by those who don't understand it because their interpretation of it seems to fit in with their beliefs and/or New Age agenda.

The video's commentary is a brilliant example of a pseudo-scientific word salad! (i.e. total bollox.) I think I might use it when explaining the woo that the internet if full of.

kirolak
10th May 2017, 17:07
It seems this same post alleging that the Schumann resonance has "increased" has made its way across various forums on the net. . . I wonder why?

Nick Matkin
10th May 2017, 18:25
Maybe it's appeared on some influential alternative-media website or book, and uncritical wannabe-believers pick it up without understanding the science.

Didn't the Flat Earth meme get kick-started like that after some book was published three or four years ago?

Can you say where else it's cropped up? Maybe I could help "clear up any confusion"... :bigsmile:

Joe Akulis
11th May 2017, 19:26
It's another example of one of those subjects that just won't go away. Like so much technical information, it gets repeatedly misinterpreted and misused by those who don't understand it because their interpretation of it seems to fit in with their beliefs and/or New Age agenda.


Trying to decide if this is the modern equivalent of a priest telling someone, "This is God's will." :-)

TargeT
12th May 2017, 16:57
So...

I made a video on this topic, Modwiz explained the Schumann resonance very eloquently in a recent video and I decided to use that to help clarify this topic (as well as highlight some of the silliness surrounding this topic).

EFKLx_E-eXc

Fairy Friend
14th May 2017, 18:35
Although it took me a bit to muster through the op video. Doesn't even do a fair job of explaining anything much. That said. You are wrong about no changes associated with Schumann resonance and earthquakes.

https://www.google.com/search?q=publication+schumman+resonance+and+earthquakes&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en-us&client=safari

http://www.ann-geophys.net/23/1335/2005/angeo-23-1335-2005.pdf

I hesitate to even mention much about this because so many take this and twist it to their own theories of all kinds of things and lack perspective on it. There is a minor connection between disruption of a local area and an earthquake occurring nearby right afterward. This research hasn't panned out much because it's like a minor piece of the puzzle but neglects the more important 95% of the whole picture. Which is understanding which Coronal holes, flares and filament eruptions mean something and which don't. This has lead to a more fine tuned predictive model but I consider it collaborating evidence of the sun/earth electromagnetic circuit/connection.

To use a metaphor it's like tapping a balloon. Most of the shape is unaffected, it bows where an impact occurs and bounces right back. I found that suspiciousobservers puts a visual on this at the end their videos which is good and more inclusive of the bigger picture. Don't be mislead about the connections traveling in a straight line though. It also feeds the lightning and triggers hurricane formation.

That also said, I give literary license when it comes to trying to describe something and lacking the words to do so. Been there and I struggle describing things myself. Whether it's this or DNA activation or a new app got downloaded in my brain, it's a way to try to explain changes or things happening. So if people want to refer to it as the "heartbeat of the earth" they are entitled too. But don't get stuck thinking it has to be a certain way. That stops progression when you need to let the truth reveal itself. And accept the answers science gives you.

TargeT
14th May 2017, 18:39
I posted this in response to a comment on the Schumann video; seemed like a good metaphor:


I'm not a musician so resonance and harmonics aren't the most solid concepts in my mind; but here's my take on clarifying it a bit more:

The base resonance of 7.8 (and the strongest) the one that actually demonstrably effects humans (or rather, the lack of the resonance effects them) is the 7.8hz resonance; which is also the the strongest. Other harmonics of 7.8 will also exist at the same time.. it's like dropping a rock in a pond, the first wave is defiantly prominent, in fact if you were to describe the event at a low enough resolution perhaps all you would see is that first wave, but there are other waves behind it at generally predictable intervals and decreasing in intensity as they go farther from the initial impact wave The first wave is the spike in amplitude, it distorts a bit too because its so strong, the other waves show the "frequency" (the distance between the waves) and it's a set number for the most part (this is also sort of what happens when lighting strikes.. the amplitude spike is huge, but very loclized.. then the earth/ionosphere cavity resonates, where you measure is really important).

it also should be mentioned that these spikes in amplitude are very short in duration, by far the most common, easily measurable wave is at 7.8ish... and that, has not changed; nor will it until either the size of the earth changes or the size of the atmosphere (or both, as long as it's not proportional) .

Bill Ryan
16th May 2017, 12:17
Folks, I've moved all the posts about the possible expanding earth to this new thread.
(http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?97720-Is-the-Earth-expanding)

Is the Earth expanding? (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?97720-Is-the-Earth-expanding)