Bielekgate

[str8thinker]

I thought I might toss this around in the forum and see what you other guys think.

The Philadelphia Experiment, considered by many to be a hoax, has nevertheless attracted the interest of serious historians such as Richard Dolan. It and the Montauk Project rely for a lot of their authenticity on statements by Al Bielek.

His statements have been debunked so thoroughly on the Web that I am unable to form an opinion about his truthfulness or otherwise.

http://mirrors.wordsforgood.org/educate-yourself.org/ab/index.html
http://www.bielek-debunked.com/
http://www.bielek-debunked.com/Advocates.html
http://groups.google.com/group/Rise-and-Fall-of-Al-Bielek
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_experiment

Some years have elapsed. Was he truthful or a pathological liar? How much of what he claims can be supported?

[Carmody]

Well, my personal investigations into the science of dimensional realities.. and.. due to connectivity, the paranormal and thus..in the end, human evolution...those explorations came about due to being given the book 'The Philadelphia Experiment', written by Berlitz. That was 30 years ago.

The thing to contemplate is that debunking will naturally collide with real emergent sciences.

That's a given. The pair will always meet.

Such a condition may be considered to exist only in the presence of a truth, for the economy of nature as tied to reality dictates that, in all likelihood, nature would not waste itself disproving a non-question.

I never needed to look at anything else but the book. Enough is in there for a smart man to figure it out. But, that involves just the analysis of the basic project itself.