just gaz
24th June 2017, 11:23
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aYy-Rdd5_Ic
Bill Ryan
24th June 2017, 13:47
Yes, it's a natural formation.
Occam's Razor (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor). Drop a mobile camera (like the Mars Rover) randomly, anywhere on Earth, where the landscape isn't covered in ice, water, city, farmland, or a forest. You'd NEVER see all these 'artifacts' that people claim to make out. Not even on our own planet, which is full of life.
I've been to many rocky, wilderness places. There's nothing there. And anatomically modern humans have been living here, everywhere, for hundreds of thousands of years.
As a counterpart, I bet you could post a blurry picture of any rocky desert (Gobi, Atacama, Sahara, Mohave, or even the moon) and 'see' skulls, statues, 'animals' — and even buildings, if you didn't know what the scale was.
As long as the photos are blurry enough, and your imagination and desire to see something were both strong enough.
Of course, I'm convinced that there really are artifacts on Mars. Some very large ones, too. There's nothing living that's large and indigenous there now; but there sure once was.
The videos of 'ISS Ufo Watch' don't help real Mars research at all, in my opinion: they tend to dilute and distract from the important issues, and the same is happening in ufology at the moment, as many of us are very aware.
indigopete
24th June 2017, 13:48
It's just the way the shadows are interpreted.
You could take a 1000 photographs of the rocky countryside on Earth and find exactly the same thing.
enigma3
24th June 2017, 18:01
Agree. If one wants to see real anomalies on Mars just look at the pics in "Dark Mission". The pics of Cydonia are truly boggling. And to think that city was nuked. My oh my.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.