Dr. Leroy Hulsey testifies regarding structural analysis of WTC 7 collapse

[iceni tribe]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mf1ewgbq4fY&feature=youtu.be

Worth a watch and isn't that Daniel p sheehan 2012 disclosure witness asking questions at around 10.00 ?

I like the bit When asked by the panel of attorneys, “On a scale of 1 to 100, how probable do you think it is that this building could have collapsed simply because of the fire?” Dr. Hulsey stated categorically, “Zero.” Asked if he would flunk one of his Ph.D. students for turning in the kind of analysis that NIST did, he replied emphatically, “Yes.”

WTC 7 Final Report Due in August

final report of the WTC 7 computer modeling study, which is being conducted by Dr. Leroy Hulsey at the University of Alaska Fairbanks (UAF), is set to be released in August of this year, shortly before the September 11th anniversary.

This report will be the culmination of more than two years of intensive modeling of WTC 7’s complex structural system, leading to an unbiased and transparent evaluation of whether fire or any other natural scenario could have caused the total, near-symmetrical, free-fall destruction of the building, as witnessed on 9/11.

Unlike the studies conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and by firms working on behalf of Silverstein Properties and Con Edison, all of the data associated with the UAF study will be made public so that it can fully be scrutinized.

Earlier this year, Dr. Hulsey and his team entered the final stage of their research, in which they are analyzing the structural response of the building to the failure of one or more columns and determining the kind of failures needed to reproduce the observed structural behavior.

Before this stage, the team was evaluating the effects of fire on the structural members of Floor 13 near Column 79, where the collapse of WTC 7 is alleged to have initiated. The results of that analysis led Dr. Hulsey’s team to conclude in no uncertain terms that fires could not have triggered a global progressive collapse.

http://action.ae911truth.org/o/50694/t/0/blastContent.jsp?email_blast_KEY=1369693

[Cidersomerset]

Good vid Iceni , and I'm glad to hear he is continuing his work to find out
what might of brought down the building.

http://peugeot-refiauto.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Nol-percent.jpg chance of building 7 collapsing due to fire.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Grenfell Tower fire has brought building 7 back to attention for some
though I'm sure there are many differences.....

https://media0.giphy.com/media/4B0WsfHQ5LyAE/200.gif#107-grid1
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?98330-Huge-fire-in-London-tower-block&p=1162874&viewfull=1#post1162874

[Flash]

Hi Iceni Tribe,

In the title, I did not know who Dr Husley is nor what the panel of attorney is or is for. I almost did not look a the thread, while I am interested in it.

By the way thanks for bringing in the information.

Is it possible next time to try to be a bit more explicit in the title - like adding Twin tower, or building 7, or any common reference point. although I know title are often difficult to come by to be succinct and explicit at the same time.

Thanks anyhow

And mostly thank you many times for having taken the time to make a resumé

[7alon]

Just for some clarity, perhaps we could add wtc 7 to the thread title. Excellent article, though. Many thanks. Hopefully we can get some justice. I hope these people know how deep this goes, and what is willing to be done to keep people from finding the truth.

[ThePythonicCow]

Just for some clarity, perhaps we could add wtc 7 to the thread title.
Good idea - done.

[Cardillac]

I figure there are only two plausible possibilities as to what brought down the twin towers (tower 7 is something else):

A. Dr. Judy Woods' "Where Did the Towers Go?"

OR:

B: the explanation presented by Dr. Joseph Farrell in his book "Hidden Finance, Rogue Networks and Secret Sorcery"

read both then draw your opinion-

be well all-

Larry

[Latti]

I appreciate Dr. Hulsey's refusal to state an opinion as to the cause of WTC7's collapse and to science. On the other hand, if you investigate all building collapses since 1885, you will find only earth quakes, floods, tsunamis, storms, bombs and controlled demolitions.

There were no earth quakes, floods, tsunamis or storms in NYC on 9/11/2001.

[onawah]

BBC interviews AE911Truth's Roland Angle
AE911Truth
Published on Feb 16, 2018
sR9YVXEyh-I

BBC Journalism 101:
They’re Just ‘Conspiracy Theorists’
in Need of an Explanation
Two weeks ago, the BBC published a vapid iteration of its unrivaled brand of anti-journalism on all things 9/11, which it unironically titled: “The people who think 9/11 may have been an ‘inside job.’”

Unlike the hate-mongering Gizmodo article of two weeks before that, the BBC piece adopted a softer tone, trotting out the familiar trope of suggesting that people believe in “conspiracy theories” because of their supposed “need for an explanation that’s proportional to the event itself.”

We’re told there’s a “dissonance that results when people hear that a relatively small group of men using low-tech weapons caused such cataclysmic carnage.” It’s as if the author, Chris Bell, and the expert he quotes never considered that cognitive dissonance is the very reason so many people cling to the official narrative despite being faced with the overwhelming evidence of its falsity.

Featured in Bell’s piece are, among others, British 9/11 family member Matt Campbell and AE911Truth’s newest board member, Roland Angle, PE, a civil engineer of 50 years. Bell writes of Angle:

“Any apparent discrepancy [regarding the BBC’s reporting of WTC 7’s total destruction 23 minutes before it actually occurred] was cleared up by a 2008 report by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) which found that WTC7 collapsed after fires on multiple floors ‘caused a critical support column to fail, initiating a fire-induced progressive collapse that brought the building down’.

“But that did not change the minds of the conspiracy theorists.

“AE911 Truth board member Roland Angle alleges there are significant errors in the NIST report. His organisation has raised hundreds of thousands of dollars to fund additional research at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. The conclusions of that study will be published in 2018.

“‘We're trying to clear up the reputation of our own profession,’ Roland tells me. ‘We can say what didn't happen that day, no matter what the government report says.’

“‘We think there's a serious issue here.’”

Fortunately, anticipating that there would be a disconnect between the article and what actually transpired in the interview with Chris Bell, Roland Angle decided to tape it.

Today, we released the video on Facebook and YouTube. We invite you to watch the interview, meet Roland Angle (who also appeared in 9/11: Explosive Evidence — Experts Speak Out), and see for yourself whether he’s a “conspiracy theorist” in need of an explanation.