Joseph Farrell - Talks To Dark Journalist - Antarctica Revealed

[norman]

FOR PART 2 - Go To This Post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?98723-Joseph-Farrell-Talks-To-Dark-Journalist-Antarctica-Revealed&p=1169669&viewfull=1#post1169669)PART 1

JOSEPH FARRELL - ANTARCTICA REVEALED! ADMIRAL BYRD JFK NAZIS & ATLANTIS - DARK JOURNALIST

DarkJournalist (https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqOdHprLVQnHhE8FmIY3Yzg)
34MD7v-W2x0
Published on 9 Jul 2017
Visit http://www.DarkJournalist.com

Antarctica Synchronicity with Deep Events!

In this fascinating Part 1 episode, Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt welcomes back Oxford Scholar Dr. Joseph Farrell to analyze the strange history and peculiar recent happenings around the mysterious icy wilderness of Antarctica. The last year has seen many high level figures visiting there as Farrell has written about extensively. From Former Secretary of State John Kerry to Apollo Astronaut Buzz Aldrin, the list of luminaries who are suddenly appearing at this remote location has grown quite unusual and extensive raising major questions.

Admiral Byrd JFK Connection Revealed Here for the First Time!

A major connection between Admiral Byrd and the JFK Assassination will be revealed here for the first time as Dark Journalist and Joseph Farrell reveal that D.H. Byrd, the Texas Oilman that was friends with LBJ and owned The Texas School Book Depository where the designated culprit Lee Harvey Oswald was framed for the shooting President Kennedy, was actually Admiral Byrd's cousin! In fact Admiral Byrd had one of the mountains of Antarctica named after him! This strange artifact of Deep State intrigue opens more doors to a huge underworld of military, intelligence, and oil interests that have conspired to control history.

Nazi Obsessions with the Mystical Aryan Fatherland

Farrell details how the Nazis actually enlisted Admiral Byrd previous to World War II to help guide them with details of what they could expect once their expeditions had reached Antarctica. The Nazi mythology entrusted a great deal of mystical interest in an Atlantis-like Fatherland that they believed lay somehwere in the Icy South Pole.

Flying Discs in Antarctica?

Byrd's strange comments to a Chilean journalist after his strangely brief Antarctica expedition in 1947 about the US needing to prepare to fight an enemy that could fly easily from pole to pole have led to dramatic conjecture about what he saw that led him to come back so soon and be rattled so deeply. Byrd never again discussed his powerful sightings in public.

[WhiteLove]

Is it possible they found the origin of the huge ice crack at Antarctica was leading them to an enormous secret multi trillion dollar nuclear powered data center they discovered under the ice that during the last decades has done so much data processing down there that the ice has started melting to cause world wide climate change. Maybe that data center is a joint ET program and the secret has leaked to people in power like Kerry that were not supposed to get that information and now royalty all over the world are preparing how to feed this news into society about the ETs and the source of the climate change since the public has a need to know.

[Cidersomerset]

Joseph is always a compelling listen....He has come to the conclusion there
maybe ancient ruins or something else down there. With the odd VIP visiting
and Lockheed Martin corps presence does suggest technology of some kind.

Some good vids/articles on link though some have timed out.
Europe’s 1933 UFO Crash, Hitler, Admiral Byrd, and the Antarctic BASE NEW BERLIN
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?81417-Europe--s-1933-UFO-Crash-Hitler-Admiral-Byrd-and-the-Antarctic-BASE-NEW-BERLIN&p=951019&viewfull=1#post951019

[Cardillac]

British archeaologist Graham Hancock has postulated Antartica used to be 2500 miles more northernly than it is now and was most probably Atlantis;

be well all-

Larry

[norman]

British archeaologist Graham Hancock has postulated Antartica used to be 2500 miles more northernly than it is now and was most probably Atlantis;

be well all-

Larry

I'm always open to the idea that there has been an axis shift but there are a few markers that need plotting.

It all depends how old the oldest of the ancient sites really are. So many of them show clear signs of having been aligned to the stars and true north etc. That indicates to my mind that there hasn't been the slightest shift in axis since they were constructed. The question remains, how long ago was that?

Many sites give hints that they were built by a single global civilisation, too. The easy general thinking that goes with that idea is that it was "Atlantis".

Yet, there is clear enough evidence that no axis shift has occurred since that time, which would mean the last great global civilisation was not ended by such a cataclysm, involving an axis shift.


Was Atlantis a much older civilisation, in Antarctica ?

[Foxie Loxie]

Norman, your comment made me think about the "Adam's Calendar" that Michael Tellinger showed. I believe Kerrie made a video about it. That, if true, shows that there was a shift in the earth's alignment at some point in the past. Who knows?! :confused:

[Fellow Aspirant]

I believe Hancock's theory is that the earth's crust experienced a shift in locations, sliding around to its present locations. The poles stayed put, in other words, while the crust shifted under them.

B.

[norman]

I believe Hancock's theory is that the earth's crust experienced a shift in locations, sliding around to its present locations. The poles stayed put, in other words, while the crust shifted under them.

B.

All the ancient sites are on the crust and would have moved with it.

[Fellow Aspirant]

I believe Hancock's theory is that the earth's crust experienced a shift in locations, sliding around to its present locations. The poles stayed put, in other words, while the crust shifted under them.

B.

All the ancient sites are on the crust and would have moved with it.

So, are you implying that Hancock's theory is correct? Or are you pointing to a perceived flaw? I'm confused as to your meaning. Please expand.

B.

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Joseph is always a compelling listen....He has come to the conclusion there
maybe ancient ruins or something else down there. With the odd VIP visiting
and Lockheed Martin corps presence does suggest technology of some kind.

Yes. And not only tech people but religious figures, politicians, and astronaut Buzz Aldrin. This only makes sense to me if these people are going to Antarctica as diplomats representing their respective interests, either to negotiate something or else to help create some kind of story to explain whatever the hell it is down there that they've found.

If it's a world-shaking discovery then it'd be natural to invite leaders from diverse fields to help you create a narrative to reduce the shock of revealing it to the world.

So then think of what it suggests that these areas would be relevant: Religion. Space. Technology. Politics. What would unite these interests in Antarctica?

[A Voice from the Mountains]

It all depends how old the oldest of the ancient sites really are. So many of them show clear signs of having been aligned to the stars and true north etc. That indicates to my mind that there hasn't been the slightest shift in axis since they were constructed. The question remains, how long ago was that?

Not as long as it seems but it'd take a while to explain why. By all accounts the big catastrophe (comet impact, flood, etc.) is associated with the end of the last glacial maximum. Mainstream scientists admit it was probably something catastrophic that ended the ice age, and people like Hancock say that the end of the ice age is what fits with their theories for the destruction of an ancient lost civilization as well. So these ideas are very natural fits to one another.

Now the real problem is how to absolutely date the end of the last glacial maximum. It's not so simple. Carbon 14 dating is a fraud and this has been demonstrated over and over. One of the developers of the C14 method even said himself that the method was extremely limited and must be used in conjunction with independent evidence. Instead C14 has become the standard in absolute dating, which is completely bass-ackwards from its original intended use.

One example of many: a lava flow from the 1950's was dated using C14 to millions of years ago. I could go on all day about how bad C14 dating is. The margin of error under the most ideal circumstances was estimated to have been 1000-2000 years, and this is ignoring regional variations in radioactive isotopes, variations in how different plants metabolize these substances, and other considerations.

Absolute dating from C14 and all the later methods based upon it and using it as a standard are out the window, but relative dating is still generally okay and reveals a very telling picture in North America.

There is no evidence of habitation on most of North America until after the catastrophe. Geologists and archaeologists note evidence that glaciers slowly receded up what is now the US and into Canada over a period of what is conventionally considered "thousands" of years but which the scarce archaeology would suggest was more like hundreds of years, if even that.

Remember we're talking about how long it would take glaciers to melt from temperatures that were either (a) instantly hotter from the impact itself and taking a very long time to cool, or (b) gradually raised to/sustained at a new, elevated temperature due to some unknown climatic effect or process initiated by the impact.

So like you guys are talking about, let's say that it was because of some shift so that now North America is in a more equatorial location and it's not nearly as cold anymore. There are supposed to have been glaciers over a mile thick over New York during the last glacial maximum, about 12,000 years ago by conventional (fraudulent C14-based) dating. How many years of the new warmer climate should it take for these glaciers to melt back into Canada? That's the first question to figure out, and there is no reason to assume that it would require as much as 6,000 years as some suggest. Archaeology of Paleo-Indians and natives of the early Archaic period (~12,000 to ~6,000 years ago by the same C14 datings) is sparse, and the technological development that happened over this supposedly 6,000-year period is virtually non-existent. In other words there is very, very little real evidence for 6,000 years of primitive Native American archaeology. Again I would suggest hundreds rather than thousands of years but it's a subjective call to make. The point is that these sites are admittedly few and remarkably uniform.

These same sites are important because they successively follow the line of receding glaciers up the North American continent. As the glaciers receded from an area, these earliest people moved in right behind it and began hunting in the new boreal forests. The maturation of these forests to be able to sustain enough wildlife to feed the natives could also take 100-200 years or so, but the beginnings of these forests were moving northward with the receding glaciers.

As the glaciers moved even further away, the boreal forests were replaced with deciduous forests of oak, chestnut, etc., which sustained deer, turkey, and other game, and this is when all kinds of bizarre "Native American" cultures start moving into places like the Ohio River Valley. These civilizations seem to have already existed along the Gulf Coast and probably pre-catastrophe in Central and South America, for example at the megalithic Peruvian sites and around Lake Titicaca. This area was apparently habitable before the catastrophe, whereas most of North America was not. So Peru is a likely candidate for the cradle of later civilizations that filled in the land behind the receding ice.

These bizarre cultures (like the kinds with elongated skulls, elite classes of 7-8 foot tall adults, etc.) are still attested to in early European accounts, though they were wiped out soon after. This again suggests a very recent dating for all of these thing. For these mound-building cultures to start popping up so quickly and then still be evidenced here at the first European arrivals does not suggest thousands of years of the rising and falling of civilizations, and neither does the relative paucity of archaeological sites for any given period.

[Bill Ryan]

Is it possible they found the origin of the huge ice crack at Antarctica was leading them to an enormous secret multi trillion dollar nuclear powered data center they discovered under the ice that during the last decades has done so much data processing down there that the ice has started melting to cause world wide climate change. Maybe that data center is a joint ET program and the secret has leaked to people in power like Kerry that were not supposed to get that information and now royalty all over the world are preparing how to feed this news into society about the ETs and the source of the climate change since the public has a need to know.

No, I don't think so! :)

(Where on earth — or anywhere else! — did that wild speculation come from?)

[thunder24]

It all depends how old the oldest of the ancient sites really are. So many of them show clear signs of having been aligned to the stars and true north etc. That indicates to my mind that there hasn't been the slightest shift in axis since they were constructed. The question remains, how long ago was that?

Many sites give hints that they were built by a single global civilisation, too. The easy general thinking that goes with that idea is that it was "Atlantis".

Yet, there is clear enough evidence that no axis shift has occurred since that time, which would mean the last great global civilisation was not ended by such a cataclysm, involving an axis shift.


Was Atlantis a much older civilisation, in Antarctica ?

Silvia Iwanova's research indicates that something happened to the land and those considered to be Atlantis and Atlantians in the not so distant past such as hundreds of years but not more then about 2000 from what i can tell. That they dispersed to different parts of the globe. She calls them the survivors... She postulates as did sir issac newton that 1000 years had been added to history as dates used to have an i or j before the year and was turned into a 1, along with a false history being added.
new chronology (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Chronology_(Fomenko))

Also that stories from many indigenous cultures around the world, according to her work, were contacted by technologically advanced, red head, white beings that came from earth and gave them civilization. Hence building these structures aligned with stars and appearing as if one civilization built them.

I figure this gives some more credence to your thoughts norman.

[leavesoftrees]

I believe Hancock's theory is that the earth's crust experienced a shift in locations, sliding around to its present locations. The poles stayed put, in other words, while the crust shifted under them.

B.

This is not Hancock's theory but that of Charles Hapgood and the contemporary researcher Rand Flem-Ath , who has written two books on Atlantis and the shifting crust of the earth

From GH's website:
".. I do very strongly believe that some cataclysmic agency must have been at work and I continue to believe that the mechanism advocated by the Flem-Aths, and by their predecessor and mentor Dr Charles Hapgood, namely a massive one-piece displacement of the earth’s crust, is a very plausible explanation of the worldwide cataclysm that did indeed occur. "

[leavesoftrees]

Clif High discusses Antarctica in this interview. from 34:25

He talks about the large number of personnel recently employed there, no direct mining company involvement, and much more

jzMonFzS0dw

[norman]

The big question remains. How long ago was Antarctica an ice free continent ?

The short answer is 15 million years ago.

Since then, it's been a complex story with fluctuations in ice coverage.

This video about the Andrill project is well worth a viewing to get a good mental picture of the last several millions of years. It starts off looking like it's going to be a waste of time but later gets into some interesting stuff.

LPEGzPv7quQ

Learn how Antarctica affects global climate through the University of Nebraska’s revolutionary drilling initiative, ANDRILL.

In 2002, an immense, 200-meter-thick ice shelf the size of Manhattan collapsed into the ocean off the Antarctic Peninsula, shocking scientists and raising the alarming possibility that we may be heading toward an ice-free Antarctica, last seen a million years ago. That would raise world sea levels so high that New York City would be flooded up to the level of the Statue of Liberty's shoulders. But could this really happen? Is Antarctica's surprising past a reliable guide to what may happen.

At the bottom of the Earth is a continent encased in ice, a place so remote and mysterious that it’s largely unknown to most people. Yet Antarctica holds secrets that affect our climate future. Antarctica’s secrets are not in the ice, but in the rocks beneath it.

ANDRILL (Antarctic Drilling Project) is a scientific drilling project in Antarctica gathering information about past periods of global warming and cooling. The project involves scientists from Germany, Italy, New Zealand, and the United States. At two sites in 2006 and 2007, ANDRILL team members drilled through ice, seawater, sediment and rock to a depth over more than 1,200 m and recovered a virtually continuous core record from the present to nearly 20 million years ago. The project is based at McMurdo Station in Antarctica

In studying the cores, ANDRILL scientists from various disciplines are gathering detailed information about past periods of global warming and cooling. A major goal of the project is to significantly improve the understanding of Antarctica's impact on the world's oceans currents and the atmosphere by reconstructing the behavior of Antarctic sea-ice, ice shelves, glaciers and sea currents over tens of millions of years. Initial results imply rapid changes and dramatically different climates at various times on the southernmost continent.

The $30 million project has achieved its operational goal of retrieving a continuous core record of the last 17 million years, filling crucial gaps left by previous drilling projects. Making use of knowledge gained through prior Antarctic drilling projects, ANDRILL employed novel techniques to reach record depths at its two drilling sites. Among the innovations deployed were a hot-water drilling system that allowed for easier ice-boring and a flexible drill pipe that could accommodate tidal oscillations and strong currents.

[Foxie Loxie]

Thanks everyone, for all the input....this has been a MOST interesting conversation!!! :highfive:

[WhiteLove]

Is it possible they found the origin of the huge ice crack at Antarctica was leading them to an enormous secret multi trillion dollar nuclear powered data center they discovered under the ice that during the last decades has done so much data processing down there that the ice has started melting to cause world wide climate change. Maybe that data center is a joint ET program and the secret has leaked to people in power like Kerry that were not supposed to get that information and now royalty all over the world are preparing how to feed this news into society about the ETs and the source of the climate change since the public has a need to know.

No, I don't think so! :)

(Where on earth — or anywhere else! — did that wild speculation come from?)

:bigsmile: I am thinking that since above ground in the white world they have already quite enormous data centers and if that is the case in the white world what do they have deployed in the black world for AI and where, nobody are talking about where those are located and few appear to point out they have seen huge data center facilities underground, which is kind of strange since they should be there. I am thinking that Antarctica gives them a pretty big area where they could hide it and get nice cooling features from the ice for both the power plants required as well as for the data centers and would not care so much about melting ice. But I guess this is also possible in huge underground bases. So it comes down to what type of benefits the ice would provide, which I am no expert at evaluating, I was just thinking you get quite a lot of "free" constant cooling - that is now melting, ha. I am also thinking that energy production combined with computing power is a quite logical thing to invest trillions of dollars into these days. Where on earth do you hide and efficiently maintain power cities at that scale... I am thinking that a hot Area 51 desert is maybe not the most logical location for something like that, makes more sense to store secret aircrafts underground there, reverse engineered crafts not from earth... After all it is cold at Antarctica, so whatever strange stuff that is going on there that is secret, must have something to do with taking advantage of the low temperature there... (https://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2013/12/10/antarctica-cold-record/3950019/) :bigsmile:

[Justplain]

Its funny that mainstream science will try to wedge the enigma of antarctica into their preconceived time slots. Because sites like giza and puma punku line up to true north, and show an understanding of the earth's wobble, as reflected in the procession of the equinoxes, its a fair certainty that their positionng has been stable for ten's of thousands of years. However, the Piris Reis map, which shows the underice geoloogy of the real antarctic coast, appears to show that antarctica proceeded east out of somewhere south of brazil, significantly farther north than its current position. Add to that, the fast frozen remains of siberian mammals, and you have two very peculiar oddities. Is it possble that a partial crust dsplacement occurred that shifted antarctica south and siberia north but didnt alter due north for the rest of the world?

The difficult thing about timing is that Hancock points out there is evidence of a rapid temperature rise around 10k bc. What datng methods used i dont know, but this coincides with datings of the giza construction and gobekle tepe. The water people who tried to invade pharonic Egypt happened well after this event, and these folks were of severely more primitive tech than ancient Atlantis. Their migration was most likely caused by some other catastrophe, possibly the submergence of a last splinter of ancient Atlantis, the same for the north american mound builders and the red haired elongated skull giants found all over the world.

[Bill Ryan]

After all it is cold at Antarctica, so whatever strange stuff that is going on there that is secret, must have something to do with taking advantage of the low temperature there... (https://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2013/12/10/antarctica-cold-record/3950019/) :bigsmile:... or simply that it's extremely hard to get anywhere close. Anyone hiding anything there doesn't even need motion sensors and armed guards. :)

[norman]

A crustal slip or axis tilt could possible have zero effect on the north south alignment of sites along a single narrow line around a circumpolar direction, but, all other sites not on that line would lose their north south alignment by the shift.

E.g. a specific shift could possible leave the Giza pyramids still as acurately aligned to north but would throw the South American pyramids out of kilter. Or visa versa.

If by partial, you mean that only a select region shifted, I'd expect to see quite dramatic geological signs of the folding and tearing it would have to have done.

[UfonautRadio]

Tonight 8PM PST Let's Talk Dolan!
http://www.psn-radio.com/thursdays/ufonautradio/

[Justplain]

A crustal slip or axis tilt could possible have zero effect on the north south alignment of sites along a single narrow line around a circumpolar direction, but, all other sites not on that line would lose their north south alignment by the shift.

E.g. a specific shift could possible leave the Giza pyramids still as acurately aligned to north but would throw the South American pyramids out of kilter. Or visa versa.

If by partial, you mean that only a select region shifted, I'd expect to see quite dramatic geological signs of the folding and tearing it would have to have done.

Norman, are you sure that some tectonic activity, say of one plate overriding another, couldnt occur that wouldnt affect the rest of the world?

That is a possible scenario, where a tectonic slip pushed antarctica south and the same event caused a huge temperature drop that fastfroze the siberian mammals. A coinciding comet/meteor strike, as postulated in some of hancock's work, might explain that. Perhaps the comet strike triggered a tectonic slip that slid antarctica south?

Regarding the OP vid, it appears that Farrell's conclusions of a finding down there of major geopolitical significance is sound.

[norman]

Farrell's conclusion that a "find" is the reason for all the visits, seems sound, to me. I just think that whatever it is has to be millions of years old.

My favorite theory for why the animals in Siberia were fast frozen is that a comet or something impacted the northern ice pack in America/Canada throwing a massive amount of water vapour high in the sky which promptly became a 'blizzard from hell' that buried the Siberian animals deep in snow almost instantly.

As I wrote that sentence, I wondered if the same could have happened to Antarctica but unless there was also an impact into ice in the south, I doubt it.

[uzn]

My favorite theory for why the animals in Siberia were fast frozen is that a comet or something impacted the northern ice pack in America/Canada throwing a massive amount of water vapour high in the sky which promptly became a 'blizzard from hell' that buried the Siberian animals deep in snow almost instantly.

Thats no theory it´s a solid fact, exept the part with the comet. The russians found Mammuts that where instantly frozen, they found several that had just bitten of fresh gras and had it still in the mouth. They had no time to even swallow the last bite of gras they ate from the green planes before they where frozen instantly. I doubt a comet can achive such a Thing.

[amor]

As previously said, Antarctica is the ideal place to conduct secret black operations, especially involving the space command, alien interaction and to discover the technologies of the past civilizations. Some of its members may be in stasis as well as flash frozen. Good insights as to what might be happening may be obtained by listening to the Project Camelot interviews of the Super Soldiers such as Duncan O'Finioan and others. Many Aliens may have Evil Agendas with respect to us and have their operations hidden there, undersea and on the Moon. It is also a good lookout for the Inner Earth folks relative to coming and goings of their UFO's.

[norman]

Farrell's conclusion that a "find" is the reason for all the visits, seems sound, to me. I just think that whatever it is has to be millions of years old.



Another possibility is that a "nest" of ETs has been found, and probably killed.

If a group of ETs burrowed down in the ice and made a camp for themselves down there, they would be vulnerable to being trapped and or gassed by human military.

[Justplain]

The Pirris Reis map is the smoking gun. The US geological service confirmed the map accurately depicted the land under the ice. This map displays a coastline free of ice. For humans to know this, likely from pre-deluvian times, this landmass must have been much farther north.

Assuming this ice free to frozen status can be explained best by a partial crustal displacement, in order for giza and puma punku to remain aligned to true north, then parts of the predeluvian civilization could be fast frozen, especially on higher ground. I believe magnetic anomalies have been identified, like those of large urban centres, at submerged Antarctican lakes. That would be a location the spooks would have drilled to with their nuclear powered drilling machines.

The alphabet soup spook agencies have been crawling around antarctica for generations, according to reports, therefore they've known about this since before ww2. Something big must have recently surfaced to attract the celebrities of late, though. It would be interesting to find out what.

[norman]

"The Pirris Reis map is the smoking gun".

In more ways than one.

Notice that the map shows Antarctica to be exactly where it is today. It doesn't show Antarctica high up in the sun warmed region.

The mystery is perplexing, but we must be careful to remain logical, and avoid forming contemporary fairy tales.

[Spiral]

"The Pirris Reis map is the smoking gun".

In more ways than one.

Notice that the map shows Antarctica to be exactly where it is today. It doesn't show Antarctica high up in the sun warmed region.

The mystery is perplexing, but we must be careful to remain logical, and avoid forming contemporary fairy tales.

It shows it relative to other landmasses, so what if the whole globe was turned ?

There is another possibility beyond an asteroid slamming into the planet, and that is the Moon.

Someone or something very carefully positioned our moon where it is, it couldn't have got there by chance, it's too big for this size planet....when it was put there it must have cause some massive changes here, could that include rotating the Earth ?

[norman]

"The Pirris Reis map is the smoking gun".

In more ways than one.

Notice that the map shows Antarctica to be exactly where it is today. It doesn't show Antarctica high up in the sun warmed region.

The mystery is perplexing, but we must be careful to remain logical, and avoid forming contemporary fairy tales.

It shows it relative to other landmasses, so what if the whole globe was turned ?

There is another possibility beyond an asteroid slamming into the planet, and that is the Moon.

Someone or something very carefully positioned our moon where it is, it couldn't have got there by chance, it's too big for this size planet....when it was put there it must have cause some massive changes here, could that include rotating the Earth ?

Have you read my previous posts about the alignment of various ancient sites around the world Spiral ?



British archeaologist Graham Hancock has postulated Antartica used to be 2500 miles more northernly than it is now and was most probably Atlantis;

be well all-

Larry

I'm always open to the idea that there has been an axis shift but there are a few markers that need plotting.

It all depends how old the oldest of the ancient sites really are. So many of them show clear signs of having been aligned to the stars and true north etc. That indicates to my mind that there hasn't been the slightest shift in axis since they were constructed. The question remains, how long ago was that?

Many sites give hints that they were built by a single global civilisation, too. The easy general thinking that goes with that idea is that it was "Atlantis".

Yet, there is clear enough evidence that no axis shift has occurred since that time, which would mean the last great global civilisation was not ended by such a cataclysm, involving an axis shift.


Was Atlantis a much older civilisation, in Antarctica ?



A crustal slip or axis tilt could possible have zero effect on the north south alignment of sites along a single narrow line around a circumpolar direction, but, all other sites not on that line would lose their north south alignment by the shift.

E.g. a specific shift could possible leave the Giza pyramids still as acurately aligned to north but would throw the South American pyramids out of kilter. Or visa versa.

If by partial, you mean that only a select region shifted, I'd expect to see quite dramatic geological signs of the folding and tearing it would have to have done.


There must still be something crucial that none of us have discovered or thought of that makes sense of all these things. As I've said already, I'm wide open to all possibilities, but I do mean possibilities.

[uzn]

Breaking News: Biggest recorded Iceberg just broke off from the Larsen C Iceshelf. It´s not so much an Iceberg more an Iceshelf but really big: 5800 square Kilometers, that´s a third of Whales.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d5/Moa_iceshelves.jpg
http://1.f.ix.de/scale/geometry/700/q75/tp/imgs/89/2/2/3/9/1/3/2/larsen_amo_2017193-84a5278868f205ee.png

Sorry, a bit off Topic.

[Foxie Loxie]

Thanks for going a bit off Topic! Now I can visualize better! :highfive:

[Justplain]

I believe the Piris Reis map shows Antarctica extending east at the same latitude as modern day uraguay. That is certainly not in its current day position.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Piri_Reis_map

[norman]

Ok, fair point, so that part of Antarctica may have been able to support a civilisation.

Is it that part where they are digging up God knows what ?

My inpression is that they are up to something near the south pole, but perhaps that's a deliberate diversion.

[alexius]

@Bill Ryan

I am very curious in your'e thoughts about what's going on there in Antarctica. Can you please share? :)

Blessings

[norman]

JOSEPH FARRELL: ANTARCTICA ATLANTIS! EDGAR CAYCE POSEIDIAN FIRE CRYSTAL - DARK JOURNALIST

80-gYbUgoss
Published on 28 Jul 2017
Visit: http://www.DarkJournalist.com

**ANTARCTICA ATLANTIS CONNECTION REVEALED!**

In this fascinating part 2 episode. Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt welcomes back Oxford Scholar Dr. Joseph Farrell to analyze the strange history and the recent peculiar happenings around the mysterious icy continent of Antarctica.

The possibility that Antarctica once formed a part of Atlantis in ancient times is explored, along with the idea that a pole shift took place 12,000 years ago and may be responsible for its current position on the globe. Edgar Cayce’s unique vision of the enigmatic Atlantean ‘Mighty, Terrible Fire Crystal’ or 'Tuaoi Stone’ which powered the lost civilization is theorized as being the cause for the destruction and inundation of Atlantis.

Cayce’s High Technology Version of Atlantis

While many esoteric traditions embrace the concept of a root culture that rose to great heights and destroyed itself, Cayce’s unique version of Atlantis had them located on the heart of the Atlantic Ocean and fully equipped with Advanced Technology, Flying Ships, Solar Power Stations, Laser Weapons, and Age Rejuvenation Centers. He saw two major groups vying for power: the Sons of the Law of One, a spiritually advanced race of psychic avatars, and the Sons of Belial, a powerful group of black magic sorcerers and shadowy engineers. The war between these two groups actually set off volcano activity due to misuse of the Fire Crystals and was responsible for splitting the continent into three islands between Florida on one side and Spain on the other.

Eventually the advanced members of the Law of One group survived founded the Ancient Egyptian and Mayan civilizations and were responsible for the cultural pyramid building as a way to preserve their ancestral memory. With the latest happenings and developments that Dr. Farrell has been tracking since last year, is it possible a small part of this Atlantean group also went to Antarctica?

[Cidersomerset]

( Edit ..... I thought I posted this on another thread )......:confused:


JOSEPH FARRELL - ANTARCTICA BOMBSHELL REVEALED! ADMIRAL BYRD JFK NAZIS & ATLANTIS - DARK JOURNALIST

34MD7v-W2x0

Published on 9 Jul 2017


Visit http://www.DarkJournalist.com

Antarctica Synchronicity with Deep Events!
In this fascinating Part 1 episode, Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt welcomes back Oxford Scholar Dr. Joseph Farrell to analyze the strange history and peculiar recent happenings around the mysterious icy wilderness of Antarctica. The last year has seen many high level figures visiting there as Farrell has written about extensively. From Former Secretary of State John Kerry to Apollo Astronaut Buzz Aldrin, the list of luminaries who are suddenly appearing at this remote location has grown quite unusual and eclectic raising major questions.

BOMBSHELL Admiral Byrd JFK Connection Revealed Here for the First Time!
A major connection between Admiral Byrd and the JFK Assassination will be revealed here for the first time as Dark Journalist and Joseph Farrell reveal that D.H. Byrd, the Texas Oilman that was friends with LBJ and owned The Texas School Book Depository where the designated culprit Lee Harvey Oswald was framed for the shooting President Kennedy, was actually Admiral Byrd's cousin! In fact Admiral Byrd had one of the mountains of Antarctica named after him! This strange artifact of Deep State intrigue opens more doors to a huge underworld of military, intelligence, and oil interests that have conspired to control history.

Nazi Obsessions with the Mystical Aryan Fatherland
Farrell details how the Nazis actually enlisted Admiral Byrd previous to World War II to help guide them with details of what they could expect once their expeditions had reached Antarctica. The Nazi mythology entrusted a great deal of mystical interest in an Atlantis-like Fatherland that they believed lay somehwere in the Icy South Pole.

Flying Discs in Antarctica?
Byrd's strange comments to a Chilean journalist after his strangely brief Antarctica expedition in 1947 about the US needing to prepare to fight an enemy that could fly easily from pole to pole with 'tremendous speed' have led to dramatic conjecture about what he saw that led him to come back so soon and be rattled so deeply. Byrd never again discussed his powerful sightings in public.

Informative, exciting, and power-packed with revelations you don't want to miss this fascinating Dark Journalist episode


==========================================================================
==========================================================================

JOSEPH FARRELL: ANTARCTICA ATLANTIS! EDGAR CAYCE POSEIDIAN FIRE CRYSTAL - DARK JOURNALIST

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80-gYbUgoss


Published on 28 Jul 2017


Visit: http://www.DarkJournalist.com

**ANTARCTICA ATLANTIS CONNECTION REVEALED!**
In this fascinating part 2 episode. Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt welcomes back Oxford Scholar Dr. Joseph Farrell to analyze the strange history and the recent peculiar happenings around the mysterious icy continent of Antarctica.

The possibility that Antarctica once formed a part of Atlantis in ancient times is explored, along with the idea that a pole shift took place 12,000 years ago and may be responsible for its current position on the globe. Edgar Cayce’s unique vision of the enigmatic Atlantean ‘Mighty, Terrible Fire Crystal’ or 'Tuaoi Stone’ which powered the lost civilization is theorized as being the cause for the destruction and inundation of Atlantis.

Cayce’s High Technology Version of Atlantis
While many esoteric traditions embrace the concept of a root culture that rose to great heights and destroyed itself, Cayce’s unique version of Atlantis had them located on the heart of the Atlantic Ocean and fully equipped with Advanced Technology, Flying Ships, Solar Power Stations, Laser Weapons, and Age Rejuvenation Centers. He saw two major groups vying for power: the Sons of the Law of One, a spiritually advanced race of psychic avatars, and the Sons of Belial, a powerful group of black magic sorcerers and shadowy engineers. The war between these two groups actually set off volcano activity due to misuse of the Fire Crystals and was responsible for splitting the continent into three islands between Florida on one side and Spain on the other.

Eventually the advanced members of the Law of One group survived founded the Ancient Egyptian and Mayan civilizations and were responsible for the cultural pyramid building as a way to preserve their ancestral memory. With the latest happenings and developments that Dr. Farrell has been tracking since last year, is it possible a small part of this Atlantean group also went to Antarctica?